Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 28, 2008

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 28, 2008

or

For the transition period from                    to                   .

Commission file number 001-32316

B&G FOODS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (973) 401-6500

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x

As of June 28, 2008, the registrant had 36,796,988 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding, 16,764,277 of which were held in the form of Enhanced Income Securities (EISs) and 20,032,711 of which were held separate from EISs.  Each EIS represents one share of Class A common stock and $7.15 principal amount of 12% senior subordinated notes due 2016.  As of June 28, 2008, the registrant had no shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued or outstanding.

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Index

i

Table of Contents

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements (Unaudited)

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(1)                                 Nature of Operations

B&G Foods, Inc. is a holding company, the principal assets of which are the capital stock of its subsidiaries.  Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “B&G Foods,” “our company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to B&G Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries.  We operate in one industry segment and manufacture, sell and distribute a diverse portfolio of high-quality shelf-stable foods across the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico.  Our products include hot cereals, fruit spreads, canned meats and beans, spices, seasonings, marinades, hot sauces, wine vinegar, maple syrup, molasses, salad dressings, Mexican-style sauces, taco shells and kits, salsas, pickles, peppers and other specialty food products.  We compete in the retail grocery, food service, specialty, private label, club and mass merchandiser channels of distribution.  We distribute our products throughout the United States through a nationwide network of independent brokers and distributors to supermarket chains, food service outlets, mass merchants, warehouse clubs, non-food outlets and specialty food distributors.  We distribute several of our brands in the greater New York metropolitan area primarily through direct-store-delivery.

Recent Acquisition

Effective February 25, 2007, we completed the acquisition of the Cream of Wheat and Cream of Rice business from Kraft Foods Global, Inc.  The final purchase price, including transaction costs, was $200.5 million.  We refer to the Cream of Wheat and Cream of Rice acquisition as the “Cream of Wheat acquisition” and the Cream of Wheat and Cream of Rice businesses collectively as the “Cream of Wheat business.”

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets acquired and results of operations are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition.  The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired represents goodwill.  Trademarks are deemed to have an indefinite useful life and are not amortized.  Customer relationship intangibles are amortized over 20 years.  Goodwill, customer relationship intangibles and trademarks amortization are deductible for income tax purposes.

Class A Common Stock Offering

On May 29, 2007, we completed a public offering of 15,985,000 shares of our Class A common stock as a separately traded security, which includes 2,085,000 shares issued pursuant to the fully exercised underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, at $13.00 per share.  The shares of our separately traded Class A common stock trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “BGS” and trade separately from our Enhanced Income Securities (EISs), which trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “BGF.”  Each EIS represents one share of our Class A common stock and $7.15 principal amount of our senior subordinated notes.

The proceeds of the Class A common stock offering were $193.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other expenses.  In connection with the offering, we repurchased 6,762,455 outstanding shares of our Class B common stock for $82.4 million, and the remaining 793,988 shares of our outstanding Class B common stock were exchanged for an equal number of shares of Class A common stock.  See note 9, “Related-Party Transactions.”  We also prepaid $100.0 million of our term loan borrowings under our senior secured credit facility.  The remaining funds were allocated for general corporate purposes.

The holders of our EISs may separate each EIS into one share of Class A common stock and $7.15 principal amount of senior subordinated notes at any time.  Upon the occurrence of certain events (including redemption of the senior subordinated notes or upon maturity of the senior subordinated notes), EISs will automatically separate.  Conversely, subject to limitations, a holder of separate shares of Class A common stock and senior subordinated notes can combine such securities to form EISs.  Separation and combination of

4

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(1)                                 Nature of Operations (Continued)

EISs will automatically result in increases and decreases, respectively, in the number of shares of Class A common stock not held in the form of EISs.  As of June 28, 2008, we had 36,796,988 shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding, 16,764,277 of which were held in the form of EISs and 20,032,711 of which were held separate from EISs.  As of June 30, 2007, we had 36,778,988 shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding, 18,895,867 of which were held in the form of EISs and 17,883,121 of which were held separate from EISs.

(2)                                 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fiscal Year

Our financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis.  Typically, our fiscal quarters and fiscal year consist of 13 and 52 weeks, respectively, ending on the Saturday closest to December 31 in the case of our fiscal year and fourth fiscal quarter, and on the Saturday closest to the end of the corresponding calendar quarter in the case of our fiscal quarters.  As a result, a 53rd week is added to our fiscal year every five or six years.  In a 53-week fiscal year our fourth fiscal quarter contains 14 weeks.  Our fiscal year ending January 3, 2009 (fiscal 2008) contains 53 weeks and our fiscal year ended December 29, 2007 (fiscal 2007) contains 52 weeks.  Each quarter of fiscal 2008 and 2007 contains 13 weeks, except the fourth quarter of 2008 which will contain 14 weeks.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended June 28, 2008 (second quarter of 2008 and first two quarters of 2008) and June 30, 2007 (second quarter of 2007 and first two quarters of 2007) have been prepared by our company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and include the accounts of B&G Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.  However, our management believes, to the best of their knowledge, that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.  The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position as of June 28, 2008, the results of our operations for the second quarter and first two quarters of 2008 and 2007, and cash flows for the first two quarters of 2008 and 2007.  Our results of operations for the second quarter and first two quarters of 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.  The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes for fiscal 2007 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2007 filed with the SEC on March 6, 2008.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires our management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions made by management involve trade and consumer promotion expenses; allowances for excess, obsolete and unsaleable inventories; pension benefits; purchase accounting

5

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(2)                                 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

allocations; the recoverability of goodwill, trademarks, customer relationship intangibles, property, plant and equipment and deferred tax assets; the accounting for our enhanced income securities (EISs); the accounting for earnings per share and the accounting for stock-based compensation expense.  Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year, with the exception of certain provisions deferred until the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year.  In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, until January 1, 2009.  The impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities was not material to our consolidated interim financial statements.  The expanded disclosures about fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities are presented in note 6.  We have not yet determined the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our non-financial assets and liabilities which are not recognized on a recurring basis; however we do not anticipate it to materially impact our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (SFAS No. 141R), and SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (SFAS No. 160).  SFAS No. 141R requires an acquirer to measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair values on the acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over the net identifiable assets acquired.  SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements.  SFAS No. 141R and SFAS No. 160 are effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year.  We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 141R and SFAS No. 160 on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.”  This statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities.  SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  SFAS No. 161 is effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 161 on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (FSP No. FAS 142-3).  FSP No. FAS 142-3 requires companies estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset to consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the absence of historical experience, to consider assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or extension as adjusted for entity-specific factors.  FSP No. FAS 142-3 is effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year.  We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP No. FAS 142-3 on our consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(3)                                 Inventories

Inventories consist of the following, as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

(4)                                 Goodwill, Trademarks and Customer Relationship Intangibles

There has been no change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the period from December 29, 2007 to June 28, 2008.

There has been no change in the carrying amount of trademarks for the period from December 29, 2007 to June 28, 2008.

Customer relationship intangibles are presented at cost, net of accumulated amortization, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 20 years.

Amortization expense associated with customer relationship intangibles for the second quarter and first two quarters of 2008 was $1.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively, and $1.6 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for the second quarter and first two quarters of 2007, and is recorded in operating expenses.  We expect to recognize an additional $3.3 million of amortization expense associated with our current customer relationship intangibles during the remainder of fiscal 2008, and thereafter $6.5 million per year for each of the next four succeeding fiscal years.

7

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(5)                                 Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following, as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

As of June 28, 2008, the aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Senior Secured Credit Facility.  In October 2004, we entered into a $30.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility.  In order to finance the Grandma’s molasses acquisition, we amended the credit facility in January 2006 to provide for, among other things, a new $25.0 million term loan and a reduction in the revolving credit facility commitments from $30.0 million to $25.0 million.  In order to finance the Cream of Wheat acquisition, our credit facility was amended and restated in February 2007 to provide for, among other things, an additional $205.0 million of term loan borrowings.  On May 29, 2007, we prepaid $100.0 million of term loan borrowings.  Our $25.0 million revolving credit facility matures on January 10, 2011 and the remaining $130.0 million of term loan borrowings matures on February 26, 2013.

Interest under the revolving credit facility, including any outstanding letters of credit, is determined based on alternative rates that we may choose in accordance with the revolving credit facility, including the base lending rate per annum plus an applicable margin, and LIBOR plus an applicable margin.  We pay a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility.  Interest under the term loan facility is determined based on alternative rates that we may choose in accordance with the credit facility, including the base lending rate per annum plus an applicable margin of 1.00%, and LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 2.00%.

Effective as of February 26, 2007, we entered into a six-year interest rate swap agreement in order to effectively fix at 7.0925% the interest rate payable for $130.0 million of term loan borrowings.  The swap is designated as a cash flow hedge under the guidelines of SFAS No. 133.  The swap is in place through the life of the term loan, ending on February 26, 2013.  Changes in fair value of the swap are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax on our consolidated balance sheet.

8

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(5)                                 Long-term Debt (Continued)

Our obligations under the credit facility are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by all of our existing and certain future domestic subsidiaries.  The credit facility is secured by substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets except our and our subsidiaries’ real property.  The credit facility provides for mandatory prepayment based on asset dispositions and certain issuances of securities, as defined.  The credit facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends and create certain liens.  The credit facility also contains certain financial maintenance covenants, which, among other things, specify maximum capital expenditure limits, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum senior and total leverage ratio, each ratio as defined.  As of June 28, 2008, we were in compliance with all of the covenants in the credit facility.  Proceeds of the revolving credit facility are restricted to funding our working capital requirements, capital expenditures and acquisitions of companies in the same line of business as our company, subject to specified criteria.  The revolving credit facility was undrawn on the date of its commencement in October 2004 and remained undrawn through June 28, 2008.  The available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, net of outstanding letters of credit of $2.5 million, was $22.5 million at June 28, 2008.  The maximum letter of credit capacity under the revolving credit facility is $10.0 million, with a fronting fee of 3.0% per annum for all outstanding letters of credit.

Subsidiary Guarantees.  We have no assets or operations independent of our direct and indirect subsidiaries.  All of our present domestic subsidiaries jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guarantee our senior subordinated notes and our senior notes, and management has determined that our subsidiaries that are not guarantors of our senior subordinated notes and senior notes are, individually and in the aggregate, “minor subsidiaries” as that term is used in Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC.  There are no significant restrictions on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to obtain funds from our respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan.  Consequently, separate financial statements have not been presented for our subsidiaries because management has determined that they would not be material to investors.

Deferred Debt Issuance Costs.  In connection with the issuance of our senior subordinated notes and our senior notes in October, 2004, we capitalized approximately $23.1 million of financing costs, which will be amortized over their respective terms.  In connection with the issuance of our term loan in January 2006, we capitalized approximately $0.4 million of additional financing costs, which will be amortized over the term of the loan.  In connection with the issuance of additional term loan borrowings of $205.0 million in February 2007 we capitalized approximately $4.0 million of additional debt issuance costs.  During the second quarter of 2007 we wrote-off and expensed $1.8 million of deferred debt issuance costs in connection with our May 2007 prepayment of $100.0 million of term loan borrowings.  As of June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007 we had net deferred debt issuance costs of $14.8 million and $16.4 million, respectively.

At June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007 accrued interest of $8.9 million is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(6)                                 Financial Instruments

We adopted SFAS No. 157 on December 30, 2007, the first day of our 2008 fiscal year.  SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The standard outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures. Under generally accepted accounting principles, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, and SFAS No. 157 details the disclosures that are required for items measured at fair value.

9

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(6)                                 Financial Instruments (Continued)

Financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the SFAS No. 157 fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

 In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of our interest rate swap as of June 28, 2008, which is included in “Other long-term liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheet (dollars in thousands):

We use our interest rate swap to manage variable interest rate exposure on our $130.0 million of term loan borrowings.  Our objective for holding this derivative is to decrease the volatility of future cash flows associated with interest payments on our variable rate debt.

Cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, income tax receivable, trade accounts payable, accrued expenses and dividends payable are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at carrying value, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The carrying values and fair values of our senior notes and senior subordinated notes as of June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

(1)          Fair values are estimated based on quoted market prices, except as otherwise noted in footnotes (2) and (3) below.

(2)          Solely for purposes of this presentation, we have assumed that the fair value of each senior subordinated note at June 28, 2008 was $7.61, based upon the $9.10 per share closing price of our separately traded Class A common stock and the $16.71 per EIS closing price of our EISs on the New York Stock Exchange on June 27, 2008 (the last business day of the second quarter of 2008).  Each EIS represents one share of Class A common stock and $7.15 principal amount of our senior subordinated notes.

(3)          Solely for purposes of this presentation, we have assumed that the fair value of each senior subordinated note at December 29, 2007 was $7.60, based upon the $10.07 per share closing price of our separately traded Class A common stock and the

10

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(6)                                 Financial Instruments (Continued)

$17.67 per EIS closing price of our EISs on the New York Stock Exchange on December 28, 2007 (the last business day of fiscal 2007).

The carrying value of our term loan borrowings approximates fair value because interest rates under the term loan borrowings are variable, based on prevailing market rates.  Our term loan borrowings are subject to the interest rate swap discussed above.

(7)                                 Comprehensive Income Recognition

Comprehensive income includes net income, foreign currency translation adjustments relating to assets and liabilities located in our foreign subsidiaries, amortization of unrecognized prior service cost and pension deferrals, net of tax and mark to market adjustments of our cash flow hedge, net of tax.  The components of comprehensive income are as follows (dollars in thousands):

(8)                                 Pension Benefits

Net periodic costs for the second quarter and first two quarters of 2008 and 2007 include the following components (dollars in thousands):

During the second quarter and first two quarters of 2008, we did not make any contributions to our defined benefit pension plans.  We have subsequently made a $0.5 million contribution during the third quarter of 2008 and we do not anticipate making any further contributions during the remainder of fiscal 2008 to fund our defined benefit pension plan obligations.

11

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(9)                                 Related-Party Transactions

Roseland Lease.  We lease a manufacturing and warehouse facility from a former chairman of our board of directors under an operating lease, which expires in April 2009.  Total rent expense associated with this lease was $0.4 million for the first two quarters of 2008 and 2007.

Repurchase and Exchange of Class B Common Stock.  We used a portion of the proceeds of the Class A common stock offering to repurchase 6,762,455 shares of our Class B common stock, which were held by, among others, Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co., L.P. (BRS), Stephen C. Sherrill, the chairman of our board of directors, and certain of our current and former executive officers, at a per share repurchase price equal to the offering price of our Class A common stock, or $13.00 per share, less discounts and commissions.  BRS was our majority owner prior to our EIS offering in October 2004 and remained a majority owner of our Class B common stock prior to our Class A common stock offering in May 2007.  Mr. Sherrill is a managing director of Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co., Inc., the manager of BRS.  We also exchanged the remaining 793,988 shares of our Class B common stock, which were held by certain of our current and former executive officers, for an equal numbers of shares of our Class A common stock in order to eliminate all of our outstanding Class B common stock.  Our board of directors established a special committee comprised solely of our independent directors to recommend to our board of directors the repurchase price and exchange ratio for our Class B common stock, to negotiate with the holders of the Class B common stock, and to recommend to our board of directors if the transaction was in our best interests and fair to the holders of our Class A common stock.  The special committee retained a financial advisor to provide information, advice and analysis to assist the special committee in its review of the proposed transaction.  The special committee also engaged its own legal counsel to advise the special committee on its duties and responsibilities.  The financial advisor delivered to the special committee an opinion that the proposed consideration to be paid by us to the holders of the Class B common stock was fair to us and the holders of the Class A common stock from a financial point of view.  After considering all of the information it had gathered, the special committee recommended to our board of directors that from a valuation standpoint, the purchase price for the Class B common stock to be repurchased should be the offering price of the Class A common stock in the offering, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, and that each share of our Class B common stock to be exchanged should be exchanged for one share of our Class A common stock.  The special committee also recommended to our board of directors that based on the repurchase price and Class A and Class B exchange ratio and other material terms of the transaction, the transaction was advisable and in our best interests and fair to the holders of our Class A common stock.

(10)                          Commitments and Contingencies

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations in the normal course of business.  Based on our experience to date, management believes that the future cost of compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations (and liability for any known environmental conditions) will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.  However, we cannot predict what environmental or health and safety legislation or regulations will be enacted in the future or how existing or future laws or regulations will be enforced, administered or interpreted, nor can we predict the amount of future expenditures that may be required in order to comply with such environmental or health and safety laws or regulations or to respond to such environmental claims.

During an environmental compliance audit of our Hurlock, Maryland facility conducted by a third-party consultant, we became aware of reporting violations of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) and other environmental regulations.  We voluntarily self-disclosed these potential violations to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pursuant to the EPA’s self-disclosure policy.  At the current time, we cannot reasonably estimate the penalty, if any, that may be imposed, but are working closely with the EPA to resolve this matter.  If a penalty is imposed, we do not expect that it will have a material adverse affect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

12

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(10)                          Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

We are from time to time involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings involving product liability claims, worker’s compensation and other employee claims, and tort and other general liability claims, as well as trademark, copyright, patent infringement and related claims and legal actions.  In the opinion of our management, the ultimate disposition of any currently pending claims or actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

We have employment agreements with our executive officers.  The agreements generally continue until terminated by the executive or by us, and provide for severance payments under certain circumstances, including termination by us without cause (as defined) or as a result of the employees’ disability, or termination by us or a deemed termination upon a change of control (as defined).  Severance benefits include payments for salary continuation, continuation of health care and insurance benefits, present value of additional pension credits, accelerated vesting under compensation plans and, in the case of a change of control, potential excise tax liability and gross-up payments.

(11)                          Earnings per Share

We currently have one class of common stock issued and outstanding, designated as Class A common stock.  Prior to May 29, 2007, we had two classes of common stock issued and outstanding, designated as Class A common stock and Class B common stock.   For periods in which we had shares of both Class A and Class B common stock issued and outstanding, we present earnings per share using the two-class method.  The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings or losses.  Net income is allocated between the two classes of common stock based upon the two-class method.  Basic and diluted earnings per share for the Class A common stock and Class B common stock is calculated by dividing allocated net income by the weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock outstanding.

13

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(11)                          Earnings per Share (Continued)

Since May 29, 2007, we no longer have any shares of Class B common stock issued or outstanding.  In addition, no dividends on our Class B common stock were ever declared prior to such date.  Therefore, for purposes of the earnings per share calculation, all distributed earnings are included in Class A common stock earnings per share.  Diluted earnings per share for each of the periods presented is equal to basic earnings per share as no dilutive securities were outstanding during either period.

(12)                          Business and Credit Concentrations and Geographic Information

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of non-payment of accounts receivable by customers is estimated in the amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts.  We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial conditions.  As of June 28, 2008, we do not believe we have any significant concentration of credit risk with respect to our trade accounts receivable.  Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 46.1% and 44.6% of consolidated net sales for the first two quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively.  Other than Wal-Mart, which accounted for 13.3% and 11.8% of our consolidated net sales for the first two quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively, no single customer accounted for more than 10.0% of our consolidated net sales for the first two quarters of 2008 or 2007.

During the second quarter of 2008 and 2007 and the first two quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively, our sales to foreign countries represented less than 1.0% of net sales, respectively.  Our foreign sales are primarily to customers in Canada.

14

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(13)                          Income Taxes

As of June 28, 2008 and December 29, 2007, we have approximately $0.2 million of total unrecognized tax benefits, which includes interest and penalties, that if recognized would have a favorable impact on our tax expense.  We continue to classify interest and penalties related to income tax uncertainties as income tax expense.

(14)                          Insurance Recovery

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we learned of an alleged theft of approximately $0.8 million over several years at our Roseland, New Jersey manufacturing facility resulting from overpayments allegedly authorized by a former supervisor to direct-store-delivery independent contractor truck drivers.  While the cumulative amount of the alleged theft may have been substantial, the related losses were reported in each respective period and discovery of this alleged theft did not result in changes to any previously reported results.  During the second quarter of 2007, we received insurance proceeds for the entire amount of the loss, which is recorded as an offset to general and administrative expenses.

(15)                          Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Upon the recommendation of our compensation committee, our board of directors on March 10, 2008 adopted the B&G Foods, Inc. 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the 2008 Omnibus Plan, subject to stockholder approval.  Our stockholders approved the 2008 Omnibus Plan at our annual meeting on May 6, 2008.

The 2008 Omnibus Plan authorizes the grant of performance share awards, restricted stock, options, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock, stock units and cash-based awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants.  Subject to adjustment as provided in the plan, the total number of shares of Class A common stock available for awards under the plan is 2,000,000.

Performance Share Awards.  On March 10, 2008, the compensation committee granted the following performance share long-term incentive awards (LTIAs) under the 2008 Omnibus Plan.  These awards were granted subject to stockholder approval of the 2008 Omnibus Plan, which was received on May 6, 2008.

Each of our named executive officers and certain other members of senior management were awarded performance share LTIAs that entitle the participant to earn shares of Class A common stock upon the attainment of certain performance goals over the applicable performance period.  The 2008 LTIAs have a one year performance period, fiscal 2008.  The 2008 to 2009 LTIAs have a two-year cumulative performance period, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009.  The 2008 to 2010 LTIAs have a three-year cumulative performance period, fiscal 2008 through fiscal 2010.

The 2008 LTIAs, 2008 to 2009 LTIAs and the 2008 to 2010 LTIAs, each have a threshold, target and maximum payout.  The awards will be settled based upon our performance over the one, two and three year cumulative performance periods, as applicable, with respect to “excess cash” (as defined in the award agreements), the applicable performance metric.  If our performance fails to meet the performance threshold, then the awards will not vest and no shares will be issued pursuant to the awards.  If our performance meets or exceeds the performance threshold, then a varying amount of shares from the threshold amount (0% of the target amount) up to the maximum amount (300% of the target amount) may be earned.  Shares of Class A common stock in respect of the 2008 LTIAs, 2008 to 2009 LTIAs and 2008 to 2010 LTIAs will be issued in March 2009, March 2010 and March 2011, respectively, in each case subject to the performance goals for the applicable performance period being certified in writing by our compensation committee as having been achieved.

The recognition of compensation expense for the performance share LTIAs is initially based on the probable outcome of the performance condition based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant and

15

Table of Contents

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Unaudited)

(15)                          Stock-based Compensation Expense (Continued)

the anticipated number of shares to be awarded on a straight-line basis over the applicable performance period.  Our company’s performance against the defined performance goal will be re-evaluated on a quarterly basis throughout the applicable performance period and the recognition of compensation expense will be adjusted for subsequent changes in the estimated or actual outcome.  The cumulative effect on current and prior periods of a change in the estimated number of performance share awards is recognized as an adjustment to earnings in the period of the revision.

During the second quarter of 2008, we recognized $0.2 million of compensation expense related to the performance share LTIAs, which is reflected in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.  As of June 28, 2008, there was $1.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to performance share LTIAs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.67 years.

The following table details the activity in our performance share LTIAs for the first two quarters of 2008 as follows:

(1)          The number of unvested performance shares is based on the participants earning their target number of performance shares at 100%.

(2)          The fair value of the awards was determined based upon the closing price of our Class A common stock on the applicable measurement dates (i.e., the deemed grant dates for accounting purposes) reduced by the present value of expected dividends using the risk-free interest-rate as the award holders are not entitled to dividends or dividend equivalents during the vesting period.

Non-Employee Director Stock Grants.  Commencing in fiscal 2008, each of our non-employee directors receives an annual equity grant of $35,000 of Class A Common Stock as part of his or her non-employee director compensation.  These shares fully vest when issued.  On June 2, 2008, 18,000 shares of Class A common stock were issued to all non-employee directors based upon the closing price of our Class A common stock on May 30, 2008 (the business day immediately prior to the date of grant) of $9.72 per share.  Total compensation expense of $0.2 million is reflected in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.

16

Table of Contents

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements” below and elsewhere in this report.  The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and related notes for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 28, 2008 (second quarter of 2008 and first two quarters of 2008) included elsewhere in this report and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007 (fiscal 2007) included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 6, 2008 (which we refer to as our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

General

We manufacture, sell and distribute a diverse portfolio of branded, high quality, shelf-stable food products, many of which have leading regional or national market shares.  In general, we position our branded products to appeal to the consumer desiring a high quality and reasonably priced product.  We complement our branded product retail sales with growing institutional and food service sales and limited private label sales.

Our goal is to continue to increase sales, profitability and cash flows by enhancing our existing portfolio of branded shelf-stable products and by capitalizing on our competitive strengths.  We intend to implement our growth strategy through the following initiatives: expanding our brand portfolio with acquisitions of complementary branded businesses, continuing to develop innovative new products and delivering them to market quickly, leveraging our unique multiple channel sales and distribution system and continuing to focus on higher growth customers and distribution channels.

Since 1996, we have successfully acquired and integrated 18 separate brands into our operations.  We completed the acquisition of the Cream of Wheat and Cream of Rice brands from Kraft Foods Global, Inc. effective February 25, 2007, which we refer to in this report as the “Cream of Wheat acquisition.”  The Cream of Wheat acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets acquired and results of operations of the acquired business is included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.  The Cream of Wheat acquisition and the application of the purchase method of accounting for the acquisition affect comparability between periods.

We are subject to a number of challenges that may adversely affect our businesses.  These challenges, which are discussed below and under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements,” include:

Fluctuations in Commodity Prices and Production and Distribution Costs.  We purchase raw materials, including agricultural products, meat, poultry, other raw materials, ingredients and packaging materials from growers, commodity processors, other food companies and packaging manufacturers.  Raw materials, ingredients and packaging materials are subject to fluctuations in price attributable to a number of factors.  Fluctuations in commodity prices can lead to retail price volatility and intensive price competition, and can influence consumer and trade buying patterns.  In the second quarter and first two quarters of 2008, our commodity prices for wheat, maple syrup, beans and corn sweeteners were higher than those incurred during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2007 (second quarter of 2007 and first two quarters of 2007).

Maple syrup production in Canada, which represents the vast majority of global production, was significantly below industry projections due to poor crop yields and global demand in 2008.  As a result, the price we pay for maple syrup has increased significantly and we will likely face a shortfall in supply as compared to our needs, which will negatively impact our sales volume of maple syrup products.

17

Table of Contents

In addition, the cost of labor, manufacturing, energy, fuel, packaging materials and other costs related to the production and distribution of our food products have risen significantly in recent years and at an increasing rate in recent months.  We expect that many of these costs will continue to rise for the foreseeable future.  We manage these risks by entering into short-term supply contracts and advance commodities purchase agreements from time to time, implementing cost saving measures and, if necessary, by raising sales prices.  We cannot assure you that any cost saving measures or sales price increases by us will offset increases to our raw material, ingredient, packaging and distribution costs.  To the extent we are unable to offset these cost increases, our operating results will be significantly negatively impacted during the remainder of fiscal 2008.

Consolidation in the Retail Trade and Consequent Inventory Reductions.  As the retail grocery trade continues to consolidate and our retail customers grow larger and become more sophisticated, our retail customers may demand lower pricing and increased promotional programs.  These customers are also reducing their inventories and increasing their emphasis on private label products.

Changing Customer Preferences.  Consumers in the market categories in which we compete frequently change their taste preferences, dietary habits and product packaging preferences.

Consumer Concern Regarding Food Safety, Quality and Health.  The food industry is subject to consumer concerns regarding the safety and quality of certain food products, including the health implications of genetically modified organisms and obesity.

A Weakening of the U.S. Dollar in Relation to the Canadian Dollar.  We purchase the majority of our maple syrup requirements from suppliers located in Québec, Canada.  Over the past several years the U.S. dollar has weakened against the Canadian dollar, which has in turn significantly increased our costs relating to the production of our maple syrup products.

To confront these challenges, we continue to take steps to build the value of our brands, to improve our existing portfolio of products with new product and marketing initiatives, to reduce costs through improved productivity and to address consumer concerns about food safety, quality and health.

Critical Accounting Policies; Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires our management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions made by management involve trade and consumer promotion expenses; allowances for excess, obsolete and unsaleable inventories; pension benefits; purchase accounting allocations; the recoverability of goodwill, trademarks, customer relationship intangibles, property, plant and equipment, and deferred tax assets; the accounting for our EISs; the accounting for earnings per share and the accounting for stock-based compensation expense.  Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Our significant accounting policies are described more fully in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We believe the following critical accounting policies involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Trade and Consumer Promotion Expenses

We offer various sales incentive programs to customers and consumers, such as price discounts, in-store display incentives, slotting fees and coupons.  The recognition of expense for these programs involves the use of judgment related to performance and redemption estimates.  Estimates are made based on historical

18

Table of Contents

experience and other factors.  Actual expenses may differ if the level of redemption rates and performance vary from our estimates.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.  Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out and average cost methods.  Inventories have been reduced by an allowance for excess, obsolete and unsaleable inventories.  The allowance is an estimate based on our management’s review of inventories on hand compared to estimated future usage and sales.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment, and intangibles with estimated useful lives are depreciated or amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.  If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.  Recoverability of assets held for sale is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to their fair value less estimated cost to sell.  Estimating future cash flows and calculating fair value of assets requires significant estimates and assumptions by management.

Goodwill and Trademarks

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives (trademarks) are tested for impairment at least annually and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill or indefinite life intangibles might be impaired.

We perform the annual impairment tests as of the last day of each fiscal year.  The annual goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process.  The first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair value of our company with our company’s carrying value, including goodwill.  If the carrying value of our company exceeds our fair value, we perform the second step of the impairment test to determine the amount of the impairment loss.  The second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill and recognizing a loss for the difference.  Calculating our fair value requires significant estimates and assumptions by management.  We estimate our fair value by applying third party market value indicators to our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).  We test indefinite life intangible assets for impairment by comparing their carrying value to their fair value that is determined using a cash flow method and recognize a loss to the extent the carrying value is greater.

We completed our annual impairment tests for fiscal 2007 with no adjustments to the carrying values of goodwill and indefinite life intangibles.  We did not note any events or circumstances during the first two quarters of 2008 that would indicate that goodwill or indefinite life intangibles might be impaired.

Accounting Treatment for EISs

Our EISs include Class A common stock and senior subordinated notes.  Upon completion of our 2004 EIS offering (including the exercise of the over-allotment option), we allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the EISs, based upon relative fair value at the issuance date, to the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes.  We have assumed that the price paid in the EIS offering was equivalent to the combined fair value of the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes, and the price paid in the offering for the senior subordinated notes sold separately (not in the form of EISs) was equivalent to their

19

Table of Contents

initial stated principal amount.  We have concluded there are no embedded derivative features related to the EIS that require bifurcation under FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended (SFAS No. 133).  We have determined the fair value of the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes with reference to a number of factors, including the sale of the senior subordinated notes sold separately from the EISs that have the same terms as the senior subordinated notes included in the EISs.  Therefore, we have allocated the entire proceeds of the EIS offering to the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes, and the allocation of the EIS proceeds to the senior subordinated notes did not result in a premium or discount.

We have concluded that the call option and the change in control put option in the senior subordinated notes do not warrant separate accounting under SFAS No. 133 because they are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host debt instrument.  Therefore, we have allocated the entire proceeds of the offering to the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes.  Upon subsequent issuances of senior subordinated notes, if any, we will evaluate whether the call option and the change in control put option in the senior subordinated notes require separate accounting under SFAS No. 133.  We expect that if there is a substantial discount or premium upon a subsequent issuance of senior subordinated notes, we may need to separately account for the call option and the change in control put option features as embedded derivatives for such subsequent issuance.  If we determine that the embedded derivatives, if any, require separate accounting from the debt host contract under SFAS No. 133, the call option and the change in control put option associated with the senior subordinated notes will be recorded as derivative liabilities at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded as other non-operating income or expense.  Any discount on the senior subordinated notes resulting from the allocation of proceeds to an embedded derivative will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the senior subordinated notes.

The Class A common stock portion of each EIS is included in stockholders’ equity, net of the related portion of the EIS transaction costs allocated to Class A common stock.  Dividends paid on our Class A common stock portion of each EIS are recorded as a decrease to additional paid-in capital when declared by us.  The senior subordinated note portion of each EIS is included in long-term debt, and the related portion of the EIS transaction costs allocated to the senior subordinated notes was capitalized as deferred debt issuance costs and is being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method.  Interest on the senior subordinated notes is charged to interest expense as accrued by us and deducted for income tax purposes.

Income Tax Expense Estimates and Policies

As part of the income tax provision process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes.  This process involves estimating our current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes.  These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities.  We then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe the recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance.  Further, to the extent that we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a financial accounting period, we include such charge in our tax provision, or reduce our tax benefits in our consolidated statement of operations.  We use our judgment to determine our provision or benefit for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets.

There are various factors that may cause these tax assumptions to change in the near term, and we may have to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.  We cannot predict whether future U.S. federal and state income tax laws and regulations might be passed that could have a material effect on our results of operations.  We assess the impact of significant changes to the U.S. federal and state income tax laws and regulations on a regular basis and update the assumptions and estimates used to prepare our consolidated financial statements when new regulations and legislation are enacted.  We recognize the benefit of an uncertain tax position that we have taken or expect to take on the income tax returns we file if it is “more likely than not” that such tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits.

20

Table of Contents

Earnings Per Share

We currently have one class of common stock issued and outstanding, designated as Class A common stock.  Prior to May 29, 2007, we had two classes of common stock issued and outstanding, designated as Class A common stock and Class B common stock.  For periods in which we had shares of both Class A and Class B common stock issued and outstanding, we present earnings per share using the two-class method.  The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings or losses.

For periods in which we had shares of both Class A and Class B common stock issued and outstanding, net income is allocated between the two classes of common stock based upon the two-class method.  Basic and diluted earnings per share for the Class A common stock and Class B common stock is calculated by dividing allocated net income by the weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock outstanding.

Pension Expense

We have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of our employees.  Our funding policy is to contribute annually the amount recommended by our actuaries.  The funded status of our pension plans is dependent upon many factors, including returns on invested assets and the level of certain market interest rates.  We review pension assumptions regularly and we may from time to time make voluntary contributions to our pension plans, which exceed the amounts required by statute.  During the second quarter of 2008 we did not make any contribution to our defined benefit pension plans as compared to $1.3 million of contributions during the second quarter of 2007.  During the third quarter of 2008, we have subsequently made contributions of $0.5 million to fund our defined benefit pension plan obligations and we do not anticipate making any further contributions during the remainder of fiscal 2008.  Changes in interest rates and the market value of the securities held by the plans could materially change, positively or negatively, the funded status of the plans and affect the level of pension expense and required contributions during the remainder of fiscal 2008 and beyond.

Our discount rate assumption increased from 5.90% at December 30, 2006 to 6.50% at December 29, 2007 for our pension plans.  This increase in the discount rate, coupled with the amortization of deferred gains and losses will result in a decrease in fiscal 2008 pre-tax pension expense of approximately $0.5 million.  While we do not currently anticipate a change in our fiscal 2008 assumptions, as a sensitivity measure, a 0.25% decline or increase in our discount rate would increase or decrease our pension expense by approximately $0.1 million.  Similarly, a 0.25% decrease or increase in the expected return on pension plan assets would increase or decrease our pension expense by approximately $0.1 million.

In August 2006, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 was signed into law.  The major provisions of the statute became effective on January 1, 2008.  Among other things, the statute is designed to ensure timely and adequate funding of qualified pension plans by shortening the time period within which employers must fully fund pension benefits.  Due to the fully funded status of our defined benefit pension plans as of December 29, 2007, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 is not currently expected to have a significant impact on our future pension funding requirements.

Acquisition Accounting

We account for acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting, which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values.  Our consolidated financial statements and results of operations reflect an acquired business after the completion of the acquisition.  The cost to acquire a business, including transaction costs, is allocated to the underlying net assets of the acquired business in proportion to their respective fair values.  Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

21

Table of Contents

The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can materially impact our results of operations.  Accordingly, for significant items, we typically obtain assistance from third party valuation specialists.

Determining the useful life of an intangible asset also requires judgment as different types of intangible assets will have different useful lives and certain assets may even be considered to have indefinite useful lives.

All of these judgments and estimates can materially impact our results of operations.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the percentages of net sales represented by selected items for the second quarter of 2008 and 2007 and the first two quarters of 2008 and 2007 reflected in our consolidated statements of operations.  The comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results:

As used in this section the terms listed below have the following meanings:

Net Sales.  Our net sales represents gross sales of products shipped to customers plus amounts charged to customers for shipping and handling, less cash discounts, coupon redemptions, slotting fees and trade promotional spending.

Gross Profit.  Our gross profit is equal to our net sales less cost of goods sold.  The primary components of our cost of goods sold are cost of internally manufactured products, purchases of finished goods from co-packers plus freight costs to our distribution centers and to our customers.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution Expenses.  Our sales, marketing and distribution expenses include costs for marketing personnel, consumer advertising programs, internal sales forces, brokerage costs and warehouse facilities.

General and Administrative Expenses.  Our general and administrative expenses include administrative employee compensation and benefit costs, as well as information technology infrastructure and communication costs, office rent and supplies, professional services and other general corporate expenses.  For the second quarter and first two quarters of 2007, general and administrative expenses is net of insurance proceeds relating to a previously reported employee theft.

22

Table of Contents

Amortization Expense—Customer Relationships. Amortization expense—customer relationships includes the amortization expense associated with customer relationship intangibles, which are amortized over their useful lives of 20 years.

Net Interest Expense.  Net interest expense includes interest relating to our outstanding indebtedness and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs, net of interest income.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Certain disclosures in this report include “non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) financial measures.”  A non-GAAP financial measure is defined as a numerical measure of our financial performance that excludes or includes amounts so as to be different than the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in our consolidated balance sheets and related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows.

EBITDA is a measure used by management to measure operating performance.  EBITDA is defined as net income before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Management believes that it is useful to eliminate net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization because it allows management to focus on what it deems to be a more reliable indicator of ongoing operating performance and our ability to generate cash flow from operations. We use EBITDA in our business operations, among other things, to evaluate our operating performance, develop budgets and measure our performance against those budgets, determine employee bonuses and evaluate our cash flows in terms of cash needs. We also present EBITDA because we believe it is a useful indicator of our historical debt capacity and ability to service debt and because covenants in our credit facility, our senior notes indenture and our senior subordinated notes indenture contain ratios based on this measure.  As a result, internal management reports used during monthly operating reviews feature the EBITDA metric. However, management uses this metric in conjunction with traditional GAAP operating performance and liquidity measures as part of its overall assessment of company performance and liquidity and therefore does not place undue reliance on this measure as its only measure of operating performance and liquidity.

EBITDA is not a recognized term under GAAP and does not purport to be an alternative to operating income or net income as an indicator of operating performance or any other GAAP measure. EBITDA is not a complete net cash flow measure because EBITDA is a measure of liquidity that does not include reductions for cash payments for an entity’s obligation to service its debt, fund its working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions, if any, and pay its income taxes and dividends. Rather, EBITDA is a potential indicator of an entity’s ability to fund these cash requirements. EBITDA is not a complete measure of an entity’s profitability because it does not include costs and expenses for depreciation and amortization, interest and related expenses and income taxes. Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. However, EBITDA can still be useful in evaluating our performance against our peer companies because management believes this measure provides users with valuable insight into key components of GAAP amounts.

A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income and to net cash provided by operating activities for the second quarter and first two quarters of 2008 and 2007 along with the components of EBITDA follows:

23

Table of Contents