|
|
OMB APPROVAL | ||
|
|
OMB Number: |
3235-0578 | |
|
|
Expires: |
April 30, 2013 | |
|
UNITED STATES |
Estimated average burden hours per response. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.6 | ||
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| ||
|
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
| ||
FORM N-Q
QUARTERLY SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY
Investment Company Act file number |
811-22328 | |||||||
| ||||||||
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. | ||||||||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
50606 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN |
|
55474 | ||||||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) | ||||||
| ||||||||
Scott R. Plummer 5228 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474 | ||||||||
(Name and address of agent for service) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Registrants telephone number, including area code: |
1-612-671-1947 |
| ||||||
| ||||||||
Date of fiscal year end: |
December 31 |
| ||||||
| ||||||||
Date of reporting period: |
September 30, 2012 |
| ||||||
Item 1. Schedule of Investments.
Portfolio of Investments
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
(Percentages represent value of investments compared to net assets)
Issuer |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common Stocks 98.4% |
|
|
|
|
| |
HEALTH CARE 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Stryker Corp. |
|
46,800 |
|
$ |
2,604,888 |
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Agilent Technologies, Inc. |
|
26,300 |
|
1,011,235 |
| |
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
|
8,576 |
|
504,526 |
| |
Total |
|
|
|
1,515,761 |
| |
TOTAL HEALTH CARE |
|
|
|
4,120,649 |
| |
INDUSTRIALS 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Commercial Services & Supplies 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Performant Financial Corp. (a) |
|
43,464 |
|
463,761 |
| |
TOTAL INDUSTRIALS |
|
|
|
463,761 |
| |
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 96.5% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Communications Equipment 6.5% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
|
327,200 |
|
6,246,248 |
| |
QUALCOMM, Inc. |
|
137,145 |
|
8,570,191 |
| |
Radware, Ltd. (a) |
|
30,610 |
|
1,102,572 |
| |
Total |
|
|
|
15,919,011 |
| |
Computers & Peripherals 17.1% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Apple, Inc. |
|
32,200 |
|
21,485,772 |
| |
Dell, Inc. |
|
170,500 |
|
1,681,130 |
| |
EMC Corp. (a) |
|
300,000 |
|
8,181,000 |
| |
NCR Corp. (a) |
|
117,700 |
|
2,743,587 |
| |
NetApp, Inc. (a) |
|
217,200 |
|
7,141,536 |
| |
SanDisk Corp. (a) |
|
14,400 |
|
625,392 |
| |
Total |
|
|
|
41,858,417 |
| |
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components 4.2% |
|
|
| |||
Arrow Electronics, Inc. (a) |
|
44,400 |
|
1,496,724 |
| |
Avnet, Inc. (a) |
|
177,000 |
|
5,148,930 |
| |
Fabrinet (a) |
|
52,700 |
|
610,793 |
| |
Flextronics International Ltd. (a) |
|
304,900 |
|
1,829,400 |
| |
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. |
|
12,100 |
|
644,162 |
| |
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (a) |
|
64,100 |
|
630,103 |
| |
Total |
|
|
|
10,360,112 |
| |
Internet Software & Services 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Dena Co., Ltd. |
|
8,700 |
|
288,604 |
| |
IT Services 4.8% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Amdocs Ltd. |
|
106,945 |
|
3,528,116 |
| |
Global Payments, Inc. |
|
32,900 |
|
1,376,207 |
| |
Issuer |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common Stocks (continued) |
|
|
|
|
| |
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (CONTINUED) |
|
|
| |||
IT Services (continued) |
|
|
|
|
| |
hiSoft Technology International Ltd., ADR (a) |
|
108,384 |
|
$ |
1,119,607 |
|
VeriFone Systems, Inc. (a) |
|
36,100 |
|
1,005,385 |
| |
Visa, Inc., Class A |
|
19,800 |
|
2,658,744 |
| |
WNS Holdings Ltd., ADR (a) |
|
213,889 |
|
2,190,223 |
| |
Total |
|
|
|
11,878,282 |
| |
Office Electronics 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Xerox Corp. |
|
541,300 |
|
3,973,142 |
| |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment 24.4% |
|
|
| |||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (a) |
|
2,904,655 |
|
9,788,687 |
| |
Avago Technologies Ltd. |
|
36,600 |
|
1,276,059 |
| |
Broadcom Corp., Class A |
|
155,900 |
|
5,391,022 |
| |
KLA-Tencor Corp. |
|
198,212 |
|
9,455,704 |
| |
Lam Research Corp. (a) |
|
302,137 |
|
9,603,425 |
| |
LSI Corp. (a) |
|
140,500 |
|
970,855 |
| |
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. |
|
316,596 |
|
2,896,853 |
| |
Microchip Technology, Inc. |
|
56,800 |
|
1,859,632 |
| |
Microsemi Corp. (a) |
|
187,600 |
|
3,765,132 |
| |
NXP Semiconductor NV (a) |
|
123,500 |
|
3,088,735 |
| |
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. |
|
1,200 |
|
1,446,118 |
| |
Semtech Corp. (a) |
|
61,500 |
|
1,546,725 |
| |
Spansion, Inc., Class A (a) |
|
152,273 |
|
1,815,094 |
| |
Teradyne, Inc. (a) |
|
492,800 |
|
7,007,616 |
| |
Total |
|
|
|
59,911,657 |
| |
Software 37.8% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (a) |
|
150,800 |
|
1,940,042 |
| |
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (a) |
|
140,500 |
|
6,766,480 |
| |
Citrix Systems, Inc. (a) |
|
41,000 |
|
3,139,370 |
| |
Mentor Graphics Corp. (a) |
|
15,778 |
|
244,243 |
| |
Microsoft Corp. |
|
373,500 |
|
11,122,830 |
| |
Nuance Communications, Inc. (a) |
|
469,300 |
|
11,680,877 |
| |
Oracle Corp. |
|
194,400 |
|
6,121,656 |
| |
Parametric Technology Corp. (a) |
|
399,368 |
|
8,706,222 |
| |
Qualys, Inc. (a) |
|
14,783 |
|
212,284 |
| |
Rovi Corp. (a) |
|
163,800 |
|
2,376,738 |
| |
Symantec Corp. (a) |
|
862,300 |
|
15,521,400 |
| |
Synopsys, Inc. (a) |
|
636,784 |
|
21,026,608 |
| |
VMware, Inc., Class A (a) |
|
41,400 |
|
4,005,036 |
| |
Total |
|
|
|
92,863,786 |
| |
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY |
|
|
|
237,053,011 |
| |
Total Common Stocks |
|
|
|
$ |
241,637,421 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Value |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Money Market Funds 4.3% |
|
|
|
|
| |
Columbia Short-Term Cash Fund, 0.151% (b)(c)(d) |
|
10,598,956 |
|
$ |
10,598,956 |
|
Total Money Market Funds |
|
|
|
$ |
10,598,956 |
|
Total Investments |
|
|
|
$ |
252,236,377(f) |
|
Other Assets & Liabilities, Net |
|
|
|
(6,666,970) |
| |
Net Assets |
|
|
|
$ |
245,569,407 |
|
Investments in Derivatives |
|
Open Options Contracts Written at September 30, 2012 |
|
Issuer |
|
Puts/Calls |
|
Number of Contracts |
|
Exercise |
|
Premium |
|
Expiration Date |
|
Value ($) |
|
NASDAQ 100 Index |
|
Call |
|
219 |
|
2,900.00 |
|
444,060 |
|
October 2012 |
|
114,975 |
|
Notes to Portfolio of Investments |
| |
(a) |
Non-income producing. | |
(b) |
The rate shown is the seven-day current annualized yield at September 30, 2012. | |
(c) |
As defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, an affiliated company is one in which the Fund owns 5% or more of its outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common ownership or control with the Fund. Holdings and transactions in these affiliated companies during the period ended September 30, 2012, are as follows: [Insert S26] | |
Issuer |
|
Beginning |
|
Purchase |
|
Sales Cost/ |
|
Realized |
|
Ending Cost ($) |
|
Dividends |
|
Value ($) |
|
Columbia Short-Term Cash Fund |
|
7,300,551 |
|
120,070,338 |
|
(116,771,933 |
) |
|
|
10,598,956 |
|
|
|
10,598,956 |
|
(d) |
At September 30, 2012, cash or short-term securities were designated to cover open put and/or call options written. |
(e) |
At September 30, 2012, the cost of securities for federal income tax purposes was approximately $ 244,036,000 and the approximate aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation based on that cost was: |
Unrealized Appreciation |
|
$ |
31,067,000 |
|
Unrealized Depreciation |
|
(22,867,000 |
) | |
Net Unrealized Appreciation |
|
$ |
8,200,000 |
|
(f) |
Investments are valued using policies described in the notes to financial statements in the most recent shareholder report. |
Abbreviation Legend |
|
ADR |
American Depositary Receipt |
Fair Value Measurements |
|
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require disclosure regarding the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value and any changes in valuation inputs or techniques. In addition, investments shall be disclosed by major category.
The Fund categorizes its fair value measurements according to a three-level hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by prioritizing that the most observable input be used when available. Observable inputs are those that market participants would use in pricing an investment based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are those that reflect the Funds assumptions about the information market participants would use in pricing an investment. An investments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is deemed significant to the asset or liabilitys fair value measurement. The input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with investments at that level. For example, certain U.S. government securities are generally high quality and liquid, however, they are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
Fair value inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
· Level 1 - Valuations based on quoted prices for investments in active markets that the Fund has the ability to access at the measurement date (including NAV for open-end mutual funds). Valuation adjustments are not applied to Level 1 investments.
· Level 2 Valuations based on other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.).
· Level 3 Valuations based on significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions and judgment in determining the fair value of investments).
Inputs that are used in determining fair value of an investment may include price information, credit data, volatility statistics, and other factors. These inputs can be either observable or unobservable. The availability of observable inputs can vary between investments, and is affected by various factors such as the type of investment, and the volume and level of activity for that investment or similar investments in the marketplace. The inputs will be considered by the Investment Manager, along with any other relevant factors in the calculation of an investments fair value. The Fund uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, which may include periods of market dislocations. During these periods, the availability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many investments. This condition could cause an investment to be reclassified between the various levels within the hierarchy.
Foreign equity securities actively traded in markets where there is a significant delay in the local close relative to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) are classified as Level 2. The values of these securities may include an adjustment to reflect the impact of significant market movements following the close of local trading, as described in Note 2 to the financial statements Security Valuation in the most recent Semiannual Report dated June 30, 2012.
Investments falling into the Level 3 category are primarily supported by quoted prices from brokers and dealers participating in the market for those investments. However, these may be classified as Level 3 investments due to lack of market transparency and corroboration to support these quoted prices. Additionally, valuation models may be used as the pricing source for any remaining investments classified as Level 3. These models rely on one or more significant unobservable inputs and/or significant assumptions by the Investment Manager. Inputs used in valuations may include, but are not limited to, financial statement analysis, capital account balances, discount rates and estimated cash flows, and comparable company data.
Under the direction of the Funds Board of Trustees (the Board), the Investment Managers Valuation Committee (the Committee) is responsible for carrying out the valuation procedures approved by the Board. The Committee consists of voting and non-voting members from various groups within the Investment Managers organization, including operations and accounting, trading and investments, compliance, risk management and legal.
The Committee meets at least monthly to review and approve valuation matters, which may include a description of specific valuation determinations, data regarding pricing information received from approved pricing vendors and brokers and the results of Board-approved valuation control policies and procedures (the Policies). The Policies address, among other things, instances when market quotations are readily available, including recommendations of third party pricing vendors and a determination of appropriate pricing methodologies; events that require specific valuation determinations and assessment of fair value techniques; securities with a potential for stale pricing, including those that are illiquid, restricted, or in default; and the effectiveness of third- party pricing vendors, including periodic reviews of vendors. The Committee meets more frequently, as needed, to discuss additional valuation matters, which may include the need to review back-testing results, review time-sensitive information or approve related valuation actions. The Committee reports to the Board, with members of the Committee meeting with the Board at each of its regularly scheduled meetings to discuss valuation matters and actions during the period, similar to those described earlier.
For investments categorized as Level 3, the Committee monitors information similar to that described above, which may include: (i) data specific to the issuer or comparable issuers, (ii) general market or specific sector news and (iii) quoted prices and specific or similar security transactions. The Committee considers this data and any changes from prior periods in order to assess the reasonableness of observable and unobservable inputs, any assumptions or internal models used to value those securities and changes in fair value. This data is also used to corroborate, when available, information received from approved pricing vendors and brokers. Various factors impact the frequency of monitoring this information (which may occur as often as daily). However, the Committee may determine that changes to inputs, assumptions and models are not required as a result of the monitoring procedures performed.
The following table is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds investments at September 30, 2012:
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Other Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets ($) |
|
|
Inputs ($) |
|
|
Inputs ($) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common Stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Health Care |
|
4,120,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,120,649 |
| ||||
Industrials |
|
463,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
463,761 |
| ||||
Information Technology |
|
234,674,127 |
|
2,378,884 |
|
|
|
237,053,011 |
| ||||
Total Equity Securities |
|
239,258,537 |
|
2,378,884 |
|
|
|
241,637,421 |
| ||||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Money Market Funds |
|
10,598,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,598,956 |
| ||||
Total Other |
|
10,598,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,598,956 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Investments in Securities |
|
249,857,493 |
|
2,378,884 |
|
|
|
252,236,377 |
| ||||
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Options Contracts Written |
|
(114,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(114,975 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
249,742,518 |
|
2,378,884 |
|
|
|
252,121,402 |
|
See the Portfolio of Investments for all investment classifications not indicated in the table.
The Funds assets assigned to the Level 2 input category are generally valued using the market approach, in which a securitys value is determined through reference to prices and information from market transactions for similar or identical assets. These assets include certain foreign securities for which a third party statistical pricing service may be employed for purposes of fair market valuation. The models utilized by the third party statistical pricing service take into account a securitys correlation to available market data including, but not limited to, intraday index, ADR, and ETF movements.
There were no transfers of financial assets between Levels 1 and 2 during the period.
Item 2. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officers, based on their evaluation of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report, have concluded that such controls and procedures are adequately designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in Form N-Q is accumulated and communicated to the registrants management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There was no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 3. Exhibits.
Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(registrant) |
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund, Inc. |
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
By (Signature and Title) |
|
/s/ J. Kevin Connaughton |
| ||
|
J. Kevin Connaughton, President and Principal Executive Officer |
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
Date |
|
November 20, 2012 |
| ||
|
|
| |||
| |||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. | |||||
| |||||
|
|
| |||
By (Signature and Title) |
|
/s/ J. Kevin Connaughton |
| ||
|
J. Kevin Connaughton, President and Principal Executive Officer |
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
Date |
|
November 20, 2012 |
| ||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
By (Signature and Title) |
|
/s/ Michael G. Clarke |
| ||
|
Michael G. Clarke, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
| |||
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
Date |
|
November 20, 2012 |
| ||