Unassociated Document
United
States
Securities
and Exchange Commission
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-K
x
|
ANNUAL
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
OR
o
|
TRANSITIONAL
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from _______________to_________________
Commission
File Number 001-12000
YASHENG
ECO-TRADE CORPORATION
(Name of
issuer as specified in its charter)
VORTEX
RESOURCES CORP.
(Former
name of issuer as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3696015
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
1061 ½ N
Spaulding, Los Angeles, CA 90046
(Address
of principal executive offices)
Issuer’s
telephone number, including area code: (323) 822-1750
Issuer’s
facsimile number, including area code: (323) 822-1784
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: |
|
Common
Stock, par value $0.001 per share |
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes | | No |X|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act. Yes | | No |X|
Check
whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15
(d) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will be contained, to the best of
the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer or smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated
filer ¨ Non-accelerated
filer ¨
Smaller Reporting Company x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x
The
aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock (the only class of
voting stock) held by non-affiliates of the Company as of December
31, 2009 was about $1,206,310, based on the closing price of the registrant’s
common stock on such date of $0.023 as reported by the Over the Counter Bulletin
Board.
At April
15, 2010, 179,709,795 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
Page
|
PART
I
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
|
BUSINESS
|
|
1
|
ITEM
1A.
|
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
|
3
|
ITEM
1B.
|
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
|
3
|
ITEM
2.
|
|
PROPERTIES
|
|
|
ITEM
3.
|
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
|
4
|
ITEM
4.
|
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
5.
|
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
6
|
ITEM
6.
|
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
13
|
ITEM
7.
|
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
ITEM
7A.
|
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
|
16
|
ITEM
8.
|
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
|
|
ITEM
9.
|
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
9A
|
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
|
17
|
ITEM
9B
|
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
III
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
10.
|
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
|
19
|
ITEM
11.
|
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
|
22
|
ITEM
12.
|
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
|
27
|
ITEM
13.
|
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
|
28
|
ITEM
14.
|
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
|
29
|
ITEM
15.
|
|
EXHIBITS
|
|
29
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
34
|
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
History
of Business
Yasheng
Eco-Trade Corporation (formerly known as (“f/k/a”) Vortex Resources Corp,,
Euroweb International Corp. and Emvelco Corp.) (“we”, “us”, “YASH”, “Vortex” or
the “Company”), is a Delaware corporation and was organized on November 9, 1992.
We were a development stage company through December 1993. On January 8, 2007,
the Company changed its name from “Euroweb International Corp.” to “Emvelco
Corp.”. On August 19, 2008, the Company changed its name from
“Emvelco Corp.” to “Vortex Resources Corp”. On July 15, 2009 the Company changed
its name from “Vortex Resources Corp.” to its current name.
The
Company’s holdings in its subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 were as
follows:
100% of
DCG – discontinued operations
100% of
Vortex Ocean One, LLC (See Commitment and contingencies)
Approximately
7% of Micrologic, (held by EA Emerging Ventures Corp, a 100% owned subsidiary of
the Company, which was sold on April 15, 2010 to a third party)
The above
subsidiaries are presently dormant and the Company is presently conducting its
business, the development of the logistics center, through Yasheng Eco-Trade
Corporation. The Company board re-visits the mineral industry – see discussion
below. The Company’s interest with Micrologic been divested – see
below.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K include an opinion from Robinson, Hill & Co., the Company’s
independent auditors, that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to
continue as a going concern. The financing of the Company’s projects is
dependent on the future effect of the so called sub-prime mortgage crisis on
financial institutions. This sub-prime crisis may affect the
availability and terms of financing available to the Company for the completion
of its projects, and the availability and terms of financing may affect the
Company’s ability to obtain relevant financing for its ongoing operations as
well. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Business
Strategy
Our
business plan since 1993 has been identifying, developing and operating
companies within emerging industries for the purpose of consolidation and sale
if favorable market conditions exist. Although the Company primarily focuses on
the operation and development of its core businesses, the Company pursues
consolidations and sale opportunities in a variety of different industries, as
such opportunities may present themselves, in order to develop its core
businesses as well as outside of its core business. The Company may
invest in other unidentified industries that the Company deems profitable. If
the opportunity presents itself, the Company will consider implementing its
consolidation strategy with its subsidiaries and any other business that it
enters into a transaction. In January 2009, the Company commenced the
business of development of a logistics center.
Our mission is to develop an Asian Pacific Cooperation
Zone in Southern California to enhance and enable increased trade between the
United States and China
(See details under Item 7 of this report). The facility will provide a “Gateway to
China” through a centralized location for the marketing, sales, customer
service, product completion for “Made in the USA” products and distribution of
goods imported from China. It will also promote Joint Ventures and exporting
opportunities for US companies. The importing or sourcing materials from
China has been the solution for creating significant margins for goods sold in
the United States. While many large multi-national companies have
been able to navigate and capitalize on the opportunities the Chinese industrial
complex has created, most US companies simply do not have the resources to
manage the complexities of working with companies in China. Some of
the complexities for US companies importing from China include selecting the
right manufacturer or vendor for your company, addressing transportation, tax
and customs issues and quality control and delivery issues..
Due to the complexities and
uncertainties US companies have found trying to import goods and services from
China, our goal is to establish a centralized US based trade center. The goal is
to create a “Gateway to China” with warehouse and office space. The warehouse
will be centrally located in Southern California with easy access to the ports
of Long Beach and Los Angeles, and railways. The warehouse will have the ability
to handle both 20 and 40 foot containers including wet, dry and cold storage.
The office space will be designed to provide US headquarters for the Chinese
companies involved. One of the keys to success for the Asian Pacific Cooperation Zone is the
ability to leverage a common infrastructure of technology, administration and
transportation to sell goods and services in the United States. We anticipate
the Cooperative zone will be utilized for distribution, sales, marketing,
warehousing, administration, customer service, showroom display, pick and pack
services as well as other value added services that prepares products for
delivery to customers.
The business model is to facilitate the
importing and exporting of goods and services. Revenue will be generated through
a number of offerings including the lease of office space, storage space,
distribution services, and administration services along with other value added
services.
Our
successful development of the logistics center includes many risks including
raising adequate funds to pay for the lease of the facility and development of
the facility of which there is no guarantee that such funds will be available,
the general state of the economy in both the United States and China and
concerns over whether the recession will continue or even possibly
deepen.
Yasheng
Group
Logistics
Center and Potential Acquisition
During
2009, the Company entered into series of agreements with Yasheng Group, Inc., a
California corporation (“Yasheng”). Yasheng is an agriculture
conglomerate which has subsidiaries located in the Peoples Republic of China who
are engaged in the production and distribution of agricultural, chemical and
biotechnological products to the United States, Canada, Australia, Pakistan and
various European Union countries as well as in China. Pursuant to
these series of agreements Yasheng agreed to transfer certain assets and
know-how for the development of a logistics center and eco-trade cooperation
zone (the “Project”) as well as sale to the company control over
Yasheng.
As
part of the Company due diligence and closing procedure, the Company requested
that Yasheng-BVI (allegedly Yasheng’s parent company) provide a current legal
opinion from a reputable Chinese law firm attesting to the fact that no further
regulatory approval from the Chinese government is required as well as other
closing conditions to close the transaction. On November
3, 2009, the Company sent Yasheng and Yasheng-BVI a formal letter demanding
various closing items. Yasheng and Yasheng-BVI did not deliver the
requested items and, on November 9, 2009 Yasheng and Yasheng-BVI sent a
termination notice to the Company advising that the definitive Agreement has
been terminated. The Company is presently evaluating its options in moving
forward with respect to Group based on various letters of intent and
agreements with Group regarding various matters and is presently determining
whether it should cease all activities with Group.
As
Yasheng failed to enter into a definitive agreement with the Company, we may
lose a significant source of our potential clients for the logistics
center. As such, we would be required to develop additional sources
of clients and develop a significant sales force to achieve favorable
results.
Real
Estate Development and Financial Services Industries
Until
December 31, 2007, the Company’s primary focus was on the business of real
estate development and financial services industries through its wholly-owned
subsidiaries in the United States and Europe. In 2008, the Company
took the decision to discontinue its real estate operations. During 2008,
the Company sold all its real estate
properties
Mineral
Resources Industry
In 2008,
the Company’s primary focus shifted from real estate development and financial
services industries to the mineral resources industry, specifically within the
gas and oil sub-industry. On May 1, 2008, the Company entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Exchange (the “DCG Agreement”) with Davy Crockett Gas Company, LLC
(“DCG”) and its members (“DCG Members”). Pursuant to the DCG Agreement, the
Company acquired and the DCG Members sold, 100% of the outstanding membership in
DCG in exchange for 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock of the Company. The
sales price was $50 million, as calculated by the 50 million shares at an agreed
price of $1.00. On June 30, 2008, the Company formed Vortex Ocean One
LLC (“Vortex One”) with third party -, an individual ("TI"). In addition, we
assigned the four leases in Crockett County, Texas to Vortex One. As
a condition precedent to TI contributing the required funding, Vortex One
pledged all of its assets to TI including the leases. On
October 29, 2008, the Company entered into a settlement arrangement with TI,
whereby the Company agreed to transfer the 5,250 common shares previously owned
by Vortex One to TI. On November 2009 the Company and TI agreed to dissolve
all their joint venture and or partnership agreement, and TI waved any equity
interest per conversion of his equity position into a debt
holder.
Further,
in February 28, 2009, TI, as the secured lender to Vortex One, directed Vortex
One to sell the term assignments with 80% of the proceeds being delivered to TI,
as secured lender, and 20% of the proceeds being delivered to the Company – as
per the original agreement. The transaction closed on February 28,
2009 in consideration of a cash payment in the amount of $225,000, a 12 month
promissory note in the amount of $600,000 and a 60 month promissory note in the
amount of $1,500,000 (the “Notes”). TI paid $25,000 fee, and from the
net consideration of $200,000 TI paid the Company its 20% portion of $40,000 on
March 3, 2009. No relationship exists between TI, the assignee of the leases and
the Company and/or its affiliates, directors, officers or any associate of
an officer or director. As TI agreed with the Company to wave any equity
interest, the Company is the beneficiary owner of the Notes.
Due to
economic and business issues in the development of the oil and gas project in
Crockett County, Texas, the board obtained additional reserve report
for the Company’s interest in DCG and Vortex One, which report indicated that
the DCG properties as being negative in value. As a result of such report, the
world and US recessions and the depressed oil and gas prices, the board of
directors elected to dispose of the DCG property and/or desert the project in
its entirety. The Buyer of the term assignments is not performing under the
Notes, and in essence is in default. As the Notes are secured with encumbrances
on the wells, the Company did not make a reserve for doubtful debt. The Company
is presently evaluating its options in moving forward with respect to
potentially foreclose on the Notes, or negotiate terms with the Buyer, or revive
its operation in the Mineral industry.
Micrologic,
Inc.
Micrologic,
Inc. (“Micrologic”), is in the business of design and production of EDA
applications and Integrated Circuit (“IC”) design processes; specifically, the
development and production of the NanoToolBox TM tools suite which shortens
the time to market factor. NanoToolBox TM is a smart platform that is designed
to accelerate IC’s design time and shrink time to market factor. The Company own
100,000 shares of Micrologic - vested via EA Emerging Ventures Inc. (“EVC”)
represented less than ten percent (10%) equity ownership in Micrologic, prior to
further dilution.. Micrologic subsequently issued additional
securities to third parties diluting our interest to approximately 7% of the
issued and outstanding of Micrologic, Inc.
On April
15, 2010 the Company sold all its holdings in Micrologic for consideration of
$20,000.
Employees
As of
April 15, 2010, the Company employed a total of three full-time employees and
one part-time employee, all of whom are in executive and administrative
functions. We believe that our relationships with our employees are
good.
As a
smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are
not required to provide the information required by this Item.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
As a
smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are
not required to provide the information required by this Item.
On June
2006, we entered into a lease for approximately 1,500 square feet of office
space located at 1061 ½ North Spaulding Ave., West Hollywood, CA 90046
which we rent for $2,500 per month. Future minimum payments for the
years ending December 31, 2010 and 2011 are $30,000 and $15,000 (6 months in
2011), respectively. Our lease terminates June 2011 and we have not as yet
determined whether we will renew the lease for the existing space or seek new
space. The Company is utilizing this space for operational and
accounting services. On September 2008 the Company’s principal executive
offices were relocated from 10990 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1220, Los Angeles, CA to
9107 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 450, Beverly Hills, CA 90210. This
office space was operating as executive suites space and services which we rent
for $219 per month as base rent, plus charges of actual spaces
uses. In order to minimize cost and being more efficient, the Company
vacate said offices and operate in 2009 from its West Hollywood
offices.
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
From time
to time, we are a party to litigation or other legal proceedings that we
consider to be a part of the ordinary course of our business. We are not
involved currently in legal proceedings other than detailed below that could
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business,
prospects, financial condition or results of operations. We may become involved
in material legal proceedings in the future.
Navigator
– Registration Rights - The Company entered into a registration rights agreement
dated July 21, 2005, whereby it agreed to file a registration statement
registering the 441,566 shares of Company common stock issued in connection with
the Navigator acquisition within 75 days of the closing of the transaction. The
Company also agreed to have such registration statement declared effective
within 150 days from the filing thereof. In the event that Company failed to
meet its obligations to register the shares, it may have been required to pay a
penalty equal to 1% of the value of the shares per month. The Company obtained a
written waiver from the seller stating that the seller would not raise any
claims in connection with the filing of registration statement through May 30,
2006. The Company since received another waiver extending the registration
deadline through May 30, 2007 without penalty. As of June 30, 2008 (effective
March 31, 2008), the Company was in default of the Registration Rights Agreement
and therefore made a provision for compensation for $150,000 to represent agreed
final compensation (the "Penalty"). The holder of the Penalty subsequently
assigned the Penalty to three unaffiliated parties (the "Penalty Holders"). On
December 26, 2008, the Company closed agreements with the Penalty Holders
pursuant to which the Penalty Holders agreed to cancel any rights to the Penalty
in consideration of the issuance 66,667 shares of common stock to each of the
Penalty Holders. The shares of common stock were issued in connection with this
transaction in a private placement transaction made in reliance upon exemptions
from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933 and
Rule 506 promulgated there under. Each of the Penalty Holders is an accredited
investor as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities
Act of 1933.
Trafalgar
Capital Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg - The Company via series of
agreements (directly or via affiliates) with European based alternative
investment fund - Trafalgar Capital Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg
(“Trafalgar”) established a financial relationship which should create a source
of funding to the Company and its subsidiaries (see detailed description of said
series of agreements in the Company filing). The Company position is that the
DCG transactions (among others) would not have been closed by the Company unless
Trafalgar had provided the needed financing needed for the drilling
program. On April 14, 2009, the Company filed a complaint in Superior
Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and Case No. BC 411768 against
Trafalgar Capital Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg and its affiliates
(which was served on June 5, 2009 via registered mail and on September 10, 2009
in personal service), alleging breach of contract and fraud and alleged damages
in the amount of $30,000,000. On or about August 2008, Trafalgar
obtained a default judgment against the Company in a lawsuit brought by it (but
never served on the Company) in Florida (Case No. 09-60980) for $2,434,196.06.
The Company appealed said judgment, based on non-service and its appeal was
granted on April 9, 2010 so this judgment been vacated. On April 15, 2010
effective December 31, 2009 the company and Trafalgar settled all outstanding
disputes. The parties agreed that the debts owe to Trafalgar will be set as
$3,000,000 with maturity of 30 months from date of issuing carry a 7% annual
interest. Under the terms of the settlement, Trafalgar will be issued Preferred
Stock of the Company, which is convertible to common shares at the option of the
holders, into 600,000,000 common shares of the Company, at any time upon written
notice to the company; this is more than the total authorized shares of the
Company. In the event of conversion of the note, the Company will authorize more
shares to be issued at that point (The parties acknowledged that the Company has
not sufficient authorized shares to affect said issuance) Trafalgar will appoint
4 directors to the Company’s Board of Directors. Under the terms of the
settlement, Trafalgar agreed to continue and pursue the core business of the
Company.
Verge
Bankruptcy & Rusk Litigation - On January 23, 2009, Verge Living
Corporation (the “Debtor”), a former wholly owned subsidiary of Atia
Group Limited (“AGL), a former subsidiary of the Company, filed a voluntary petition (the “Chapter
11 Petitions”) for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code
(the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District
of California (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Chapter 11 Petitions are
being administered under the caption In re: verge Living Corporation,
et al., Chapter 11 Case No. ND 09-10177 (the “Chapter 11
Proceedings”). The Bankruptcy Court assumed jurisdiction over the
assets of the Debtors as of the date of the filing of the Chapter 11
Petitions. . On April 28, 2009, Chapter 11 Proceedings changed venue
to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada, Chapter 11 Case No BK-S-09-16295-BAM. As
Debtor as well as its parent AGL were subsidiaries of the Company at time when
material agreements where executed between the parties, the Company may become
part of the proceeding. In August 2008, Dennis E. Rusk Architect LLC and
Dennis E. Rusk, (“Rusk”) were terminated by a former affiliate of the Company.
Rusk filed a lawsuit against the Debtor, the Company and multiple other parties
in Clark County, Nevada, Case No. A-564309. The Rusk parties seek monetary
damages for breach of contract. The Company has taken the position that the
Company will have no liability in this matter as it never entered an agreement
with Rusk. The court handling the Verge bankruptcy entered an automatic stay for
this matter. On or about October 28, 2009 the parties settled said complaint,
where the other parties agreed to pay the Rusk parties the sum of $400,000. The
amount of $37,500 was advanced by the other parties to the Rusk parties. The
Company’s Board of Directors agreed to issue to the other parties 4 million
shares of the Company, as the Company participation in said settlement, which
was done on October 2008. The shares of common stock were issued in connection
with this transaction in a private placement transaction made in reliance upon
exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act
of 1933 and Rule 506 promulgated there under. Each of the Penalty Holders is an
accredited investor as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933.
Yalon
Hecht - On February 14, 2007, the Company filed a complaint in the Superior
Court of California, County of Los Angeles against Yalon Hecht, a foreign
attorney alleging fraud and seeking the return of funds held in escrow, and
sought damages in the amount of approximately 250,000 Euros (approximately
$316,000 as of the date of actual transferring the funds), plus interest, costs
and fees. On April 2007, Mr. Hecht returned $92,694 (70,000 Euros on the date of
transfer) to the Company which netted $72,694. On June 2007, the
Company filed a claim seeking a default judgment against Yalon
Hecht. On October 25, 2007, the Company obtained a default judgment against
Yalon Hecht for the sum of $249,340.65. As of today, the Company has not
commenced procedures to collect on the default judgment.
Vortex
One - The Company via Vortex One commended its DCG’s drilling program, where
Vortex One via its former member, was the first cash investor. Since said cash
investment was done in July 2008, the Company defaulted on terms, period and
presentations (based on third parties presentations). Based on series of
defaults of third parties, Vortex One entered into a sale agreement with third
parties regarding specific 4 wells assignments. Per the terms of the sale,
Vortex One and the Company should be paid commencing May 1, 2009. Vortex One and
the Company agreed to give the Buyer a one-time 60 days extension, and put them
on notice for being in default on said notes. To date the operator of the wells
paid Vortex One (on behalf of the Buyer) per the terms of the agreement 3
payments (for the months of April, May and July 2009 – Operator did not pay for
the month of June 2009) amounting to $13,093.12. Vortex One position is that the
Buyer as well as the operator is under breach of the Sale agreement and the
Note’s terms, and notice has been issued for default. In lieu of the non
material amount, no provision was made to income of $2,617 (20% the Company
share per the operating agreement) until the Company finishes its investigation
of the subject.
On July
1, 2008, DCG entered into a Drilling Contract (Model Turnkey Contract)
("Drilling Contract") with Ozona Natural Gas Company LLC ("Ozona"). Pursuant to
the Drilling Contract, Ozona has been engaged to drill four wells in Crockett
County, Texas. The drilling of the first well commenced immediately at the cost
of $525,000 and the drilling of the subsequent three wells scheduled for as
later phase, by Ozona and Mr. Mustafoglu, as well as the wells locations. Based
on Mr. Mustafoglu negligence and executed un-authorized agreements with third
parties, the Company may have hold Ozona and others responsible for damages to
the Company with regards to surface rights, wells locations and further charges
of Ozona which are not acceptable to the Company. The Company did not commence
legal acts yet, and evaluate its rights with its legal consultants.
Wang - On August 4, 2009, the Company filed a
Form 8-K Current Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission advising
that Eric Ian Wang (“Wang”)
was appointed as a director
of the Company on August 3, 2009. Mr. Yang was nominated as a director at the
suggestion of Yasheng which approved the filing of the initial Form 8-K. On
August 5, 2009, Mr. Wang contacted the Company advising that he has not
consented to such appointment. Accordingly, Mr. Wang has been nominated as a
director of the Company but has not accepted such nomination and is not
considered a director of the Company. Mr. Wang's nomination was subsequently
withdrawn. Furthermore, although no longer relevant, Mr. Wang's work history as
disclosed on the initial Form 8K was derived from a resume provided by Mr. Wang.
Subsequent to the filing of the Form 8-K, Mr. Wang advised that the disclosure
regarding his work history was inaccurate. As a result, the disclosure relating
to Mr. Wang's work history should be completely disregarded. The Company believe that at the time that these willful,
malicious, false and fraudulent representations were made by Wang to the
company, Wang knew that the representations were false and that he never
intended to be appointed to the board. The company informed and believe the
delivery of the resumes, and the later demand for a retraction of the resumes,
were part of a scheme (with others) to injure the business reputation of the
company to otherwise damages its credibility such that the Company would have a
lesser bargaining position in the finalization of
the documents relating to the Yasheng transaction. As such the Company filled on
September 2009 a complaint against Wang in California Superior Court – San
Bernardino County – Case No.: CIVRS909705. On or about January 4, 2010 the
parties settled all their adversaries. Under said settlement, Wang represents, warrants, and agrees that
the information about him that was contained in the 8K Filing and other
disclosure documents was supplied by him. Any alleged inaccuracies,
misrepresentations, and/or misstatements in the 8K Filing and other disclosure
documents, regarding his resume, background and/or qualifications, if any exist,
were based upon the information he provided to the Company.
Sharp -
On October 20, 2009, an alleged former shareholder of the Company (Mr. Sharp),
has filed a lawsuit against the Company and Mr. Attia in San Diego County,
California (case number SC105331). Mr. Sharp subsequently attempted to settle
the matter for a nominal fee, which the Company refused to accept. The Company
disputes all of Mr. Sharp’s claims as meritless, frivolous and unsubstantiated
and believes that it has substantial and meritorious legal and factual defenses,
which the Company intends to pursue vigorously. The Court on January 10, 2010
imposed sanctions upon Sharp to be paid to Defendants no later than February 8
in the amount of $1,250.00. The Order was entered January 25, 2010.
Despite several requests, Sharp has not paid the sanctions. As such the case is
being transferred to Los Angeles. On April 5, 2010 the Company filed a motion to court to
reclassified the Sharp complaint as limited scope or as a small court claim
case
Item
4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved).
|
PART
II
Item
5.
|
Market
For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Market
Information
On
November 1, 2007, the Company received a NASDAQ Staff Determination (the
“Determination”) indicating that the Company has failed to comply with the
requirement for continued listing set forth in Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(4)
requiring the Company to maintain a minimum bid price of $0.80 and that its
securities are, therefore, subject to delisting from the NASDAQ Capital Market
if it does not regain compliance by April 29, 2008. If the bid price of the
Company’s common stock closes at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of 10
consecutive business days any time prior to April 29, 2008, then the NASDAQ
Staff will provide written notification that it complies with the
Rule. On February 11, 2008, the Company received a decision letter
from NASDAQ informing the Company that it has regained compliance with
Marketplace Rule 5310(c)(4). The Staff letter noted that the closing bid price
of the Company’s common stock has been at $1.00 per share or greater for at
least 10 consecutive business days.
During
2008 The Company elected to move from The NASDAQ Stock Market to the OTCBB to
reduce, and more effectively manage, its regulatory and administrative costs,
and to enable Company’s management to better focus on its business. The Company
is traded on the OTCBB under the symbol VXRC (on February 24, 2009 the Company
symbol was changed from VTEX into VXRC). Before that, the Company’s common stock
was traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “EMVL”. On
July 15, 2009 the Company changed its name from “Vortex Resources Corp.” to its
current name, which subsequently changed the Company symbol into
“YASH”.
The
following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for the Company’s common
stock during the periods indicated as reported by NASDAQ or OTCBB.
|
|
High
($)
|
|
|
Low
($)
|
|
Quarter
Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2008
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
June
30, 2008
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
June
30, 2009
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
0.693
|
September
30, 2009
|
|
|
0.175
|
|
|
0.1505
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
0.0284
|
|
|
0.0172
|
On
February 24, 2009, the Company affected a reverse split of its issued and
outstanding shares of common stock on a 100 for 1
basis. As a result of the reverse split, the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock were reduced on a basis of one share for
every 100 shares outstanding. The shareholders holding a majority of the issued
and outstanding shares of common stock and the board of directors approved the
reverse split on November 24, 2008. As part of the reverse that
became effective on February 24, 2009 the Company was quoted on the
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol VXRC.OB. During
2009, the Company was quoted on the Frankfurt exchange, under the symbol HTE2.
The Company did not initiate this quotation nor has it filed any reports with
the Frankfurt Exchange.
On April
14, 2010 the closing bid price on the OTCBB for the Company’s common stock was
$0.012.
Holders
of Common Stock
As of
March 5, 2010, the Company had 153,909,795 shares of common stock outstanding
and 119 shareholders of record. The Company was advised by its transfer agent,
the American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, that according to a search made
by Broadridge Financial Solutions, the Company has on March 3, 2010
approximately 5,995 beneficial owners who hold their shares in street
names.
Dividends
It has
been the policy of the Company to retain earnings, if any, to finance the
development and growth of its business.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
2004 Stock Incentive Plan - As
of December 31, 2009, there were 330,000 options outstanding with a weighted
average exercise price of $3.77. No options were exercised during the year ended
December 31, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008.
The
following table summarizes information about shares subject to outstanding
options as of December 31, 2009, which was issued to current or former
employees, consultants or directors pursuant to the 2004 Incentive Plan and
grants to Directors:
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
Range
of
Exercise Prices
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Life in Years
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
100,000
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
30,000
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
200,000
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
|
3.31
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
$
|
3.40-$4.78
|
|
$
|
3.77
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
$
|
3.84
|
|
As part
of some Private Placement Memorandums the Company issued warrants that can be
summarized in the following table:
Name
|
Date
|
Terms
|
No.
of Warrants
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
Party
1
|
3/30/2008
|
2
years from Issuing
|
200,000
|
$1.50
|
Party
1
|
3/30/2008
|
2
years from Issuing
|
200,000
|
$2.00
|
Party
2
|
6/05/2008
|
2
years from Issuing
|
300,000
|
$1.50
|
Party
3
|
6/30/2008
|
2
years from Issuing
|
200,000
|
$1.50
|
Party
4
|
9/5/2008
|
2
years from Issuing
|
200,000
|
$1.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of
the warrants were exercised to the date of this filling.
Cashless
Warrants - On September 5, 2008 the Company entered a short term loan
memorandum, with Mehmet Haluk Undes a third party, for a short term loan
(“bridge”) of up to $275,000 to bridge the drilling program of the Company. As a
consideration for said facility, the Company grants the investor with 100%
cashless warrants coverage for two years at exercise price of 1.50 per share.
The investor made a loan of $220,000 to the company on September 15, 2008, that
was paid in full on October 8, 2008. Accordingly the investor is entitled to
200,000 cashless warrants as from September 15, 2008 at exercise price of $1.50
for a period of 2 years. The Company contests the validity of said
warrants.
Shares -
On May 6, 2008 the Company issued 5,000 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par
value per share, to Stephen Martin Durante in accordance with the instructions
provided by the Company pursuant to the 2004 Employee Stock Incentive Plan
registered on Form S-8 Registration.
On June
11, 2008, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Mehmet Haluk Undes
(the "Undes Services Agreement") pursuant to which the Company engaged Mr. Undes
for purposes of assisting the Company in identifying, evaluating and structuring
mergers, consolidations, acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances in
Southeast Europe, Middle East and the Turkic Republics of Central Asia. Pursuant
to the Undes Services Agreement, Mr. Undes has agreed to provide us services
related to the identification, evaluation, structuring, negotiating and closing
of business acquisitions, identification of strategic partners as well as the
provision of legal services. The term of the agreement is for five years and the
Company has agreed to issue Mr. Undes 5,250 shares of common stock that shall be
registered on a Form S8 no later than July 1, 2008.
On August
13, 2008, the Company issued 160 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value
per share, to Robin Ann Gorelick, the Company Secretary, in accordance with the
instructions provided by the Company pursuant to the 2004 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8 Registration.
Following
the above securities issuance, the 2004 Plan was closed, and no more securities
can be issued under this plan.
2008 Stock Incentive Plan - On July
28, 2008 - the Company held a special meeting of the shareholders for four
initiatives, consisting of approval of a new board of directors, approval of the
conversion of preferred shares to common shares, an increase in the authorized
shares and a stock incentive plan. All initiatives were approved by the majority
of shareholders. The 2008 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the "2008
Incentive Plan") authorized the board to issue up to 50,000 shares of Common
Stock under the plan.
On August
23 the Company issued 1,000 shares of its common stock 0.001 par value per
share, to Robert M. Yaspan, the Company lawyer, in accordance with the
instructions provided by the Company pursuant to the 2008 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8 Registration.
On
November 4, 2008, the Company issued 2,540 shares of its common stock 0.001 par
value per share, to one consultant (2,000 shares) and two employees (540
shares), in accordance with the instructions provided by the Company pursuant to
the 2008 Employee Stock Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8
Registration.
On July
23, 2009 - , the Company issued 46,460 shares of its common stock 0.001 par
value per share, to Stephen M. Fleming, the Company’s securities counsel
pursuant to the 2008 Employee Stock Incentive Plan.
Following
the above securities issuance, the 2008 Plan was closed, and no more securities
can be issued under this plan.
Sale
of Securities that were not registered Under the Securities Act of
1933
Common
Stock:
On
February 14, 2008, the Company raised Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000)
in connection with a private offering to various accredited investors. The
offering is for Company common stock which was issued as "restricted securities"
at $1.00 per share. The money raised was used for working capital and business
operations of the Company. The private offering was done pursuant to Rule 506. A
Form D has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in compliance
with Rule 506 for each Private Placement.
On March
30, 2008, the Company raised $200,000 from a private offering. The private
placement was for Company common stock which shall be "restricted securities",
which was sold at $1.00 per share. The offering included 200,000 warrants to be
exercised at $1.50 for two years, and additional 200,000 warrants to be
exercised at $2.00 for four years. The money raised from the sale of the
Company’s securities was used for working capital and business operations of the
Company. The sale of the securities was done pursuant to Rule 506. A Form D has
been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in compliance with Rule
506 for the sale of securities. The investor is D’vora Greenwood (Attia), the
sister of Mr. Yossi Attia. Mr. Attia did not participate in the board meeting
which approved this transaction.
On May 6,
2008 the Company issued 5,000 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value per
share, to Stephen Martin Durante in accordance with the instructions provided by
the Company pursuant to the 2004 Employee Stock Incentive Plan registered on
Form S-8 Registration.
On June
6, 2008, the Company raised $300,000 from the private offering pursuant to a
Private Placement Memorandum ("PPM"). The private placement was for Company
common stock which shall be "restricted securities" and were sold at $1.00 per
share. The money raised from the private placement of the Company’s shares was
used for working capital and business operations of the Company. The PPM was
done pursuant to Rule 506. A Form D has been filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in compliance with Rule 506 for each Private Placement.
Based on information presented to the Company, and in lieu of the Company
position which was sent to the investor on June 18, 2008 the investor is in
default for not complying with his commitment to invest an additional $225,000
and the Company vested said 3,000 shares under a trustee.
On June
11, 2008, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Mehmet Haluk Undes
(the "Undes Services Agreement") pursuant to which the Company engaged Mr. Undes
for purposes of assisting the Company in identifying, evaluating and structuring
mergers, consolidations, acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances in
Southeast Europe, Middle East and the Turkic Republics of Central Asia. Pursuant
to the Undes Services Agreement, Mr. Undes has agreed to provide the Company
services related to the identification, evaluation, structuring, negotiating and
closing of business acquisitions, identification of strategic partners as well
as the provision of legal services. The term of the agreement is for five years
and the Company has agreed to issue Mr. Undes 5,250 shares of common stock that
was issued on August 15, 2008.
On June
30, 2008 and concurrent with the formation and organization of Vortex One,
whereby the Company contributed 5,250 shares of common stock (the "Vortex One
Shares"), a common stock purchase warrant purchasing 2,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share (the "Vortex One
Warrant")..
In July
2008, the Company issued 160 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value per
share, to Robin Ann Gorelick, the Company Secretary, in accordance with the
instructions provided by the Company pursuant to the 2004 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8 Registration.
On July
28, 2008, the Company held a special meeting of the shareholders for four
initiatives, consisting of approval of a new board of directors, approval of the
conversion of preferred shares to common shares, an increase in the authorized
shares and a stock incentive plan. All initiatives were approved by the majority
of shareholders. The 2008 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the "2008
Incentive Plan") authorized the board to issue up to 50,000 shares of Common
Stock under the plan.
On August
23, 2008, the Company issued 1,000 shares of its common stock 0.001 par value
per share, to Robert M. Yaspan, the Company lawyer, in accordance with the
instructions provided by the Company pursuant to the 2008 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8 Registration.
On August
8, 2008, assigned holders of the Undes Convertible Note gave notices to the
Company of their intention to convert their original note dated June 5, 2007
into 250,000 common shares of the Company. The portion of the accrued interest
from inception of the note in the amount of $171,565 was not converted into
shares. The Company accepted these notices and issued the said
shares.
On August
1, 2008, all holders of the Company’s preferred stock notified the Company about
converting said 100,000 preferred stock into 500,000 common shares of the
Company. The conversion of preferred shares to common shares marks the
completion of the acquisition of Davy Crockett Gas Company, LLC. The Company
accepted such notice and instructed the Company’s transfer agent on August 15,
2008 to issue said 500,000 common shares to the former members of DCG, as
reported and detailed on the Company’s 14A filings.
In
connection of selling a convertible note to Trafalgar (see further disclosures
in this report ), the Company issued on September 25, 2008 the amount of 547
common shares at $0.001 par value per share to Trafalgar as a fee. As part of
collateral to said note, the Company issued to Trafalgar 45,000 common stock
0.001 par values per shares, as security for the Note. Said shares consider
being escrow shares, and accordingly are not included in the outstanding common
shares of the company.
On
November 4, 2008, the Company issued 2,540 shares of its common stock 0.001 par
value per share, to one consultant (2,000 shares) and two employees (540
shares), in accordance with the instructions provided by the Company pursuant to
the 2008 Employee Stock Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8
Registration.
On
December 5, 2008 the Company cancelled 150,000 of its common shares held by
certain shareholder, per comprehensive agreement detailed in this report under
Preferred Stock section. Said shares were surrendered to the Company secretary
for cancellation.
On
December 26, 2008, the Company closed agreements with the Penalty Holders
pursuant to which the Penalty Holders agreed to cancel any rights to the Penalty
in consideration of the issuance 66,667 shares of common stock to each of the
Penalty Holders, totaling in issuing 200,000 of the Company common shares. The
shares of common stock were issued in connection with this transaction in a
private placement transaction made in reliance upon exemptions from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506
promulgated there under. Each of the Penalty Holders is an accredited investor
as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of
1933.
On
January 23, 2009, the Company completed the sale of 50,000 shares of the
Company's common stock to one accredited investor for net proceeds of $75,000
(or $0.015 per common share). The shares of common stock were issued in
connection with this transaction in a private placement transaction made in
reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the
Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 promulgated there under. The investor is an
accredited investor as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933.
As
reported by the Company on its Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2008, Star Equity
Investments, LLC (“Star”) entered, on September 1, 2008, into that certain
Irrevocable Assignment of Promissory Note, which resulted in Star being a
creditor of the Company with a loan payable by the Company in the amount of
$1,000,000 (the “Debt”). No relationship exists between Star and the Company
and/or its affiliates, directors, officers or any associate of an officer or
director. On March 11, 2009, the Company entered and closed an
agreement with Star pursuant to which Star agreed to convert all principal and
interest associated with the Debt into 8,500,000 shares of common stock and
released the Company from any further claims.
On March
5, 2009, the Company and Yasheng implemented an amendment to the Term Sheet
pursuant to which the parties agreed to explore further business opportunities
including the business of logistic centers, and/or alliance with other major
groups complimenting and/or synergetic to the Vortex/Yasheng JV as approved by
the board of directors on March 9, 2009. Further, in accordance with the
amendment, the Company issued 50,000,000 shares to Yasheng and 38,461,538 shares
to Capitol Properties (which was acting as agent for Yasheng) as consideration
for exploring the business opportunities, based on the pro-ration set in the
January Term Sheet. The shares of common stock were issued based on the Board
consent on March 9, 2009, in connection with this transaction in a private
transaction made in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Rule 506 promulgated there
under. Yasheng and Capitol are accredited investors as defined in Rule 501 of
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. As the Yasheng
transaction did not close, the Company recorded direct transaction-related
expenses of $348,240, which represented the Company’s direct expenses associated
with said transaction. On April 5, 2010 the Company issued a formal request to
Yasheng demanding that they surrender the 50,000,000 shares that were issued to
them, as well as reimburse the Company for its expenses associated with the
transaction in the amount of $348.240.
On
October 1, 2008, the Company entered into a short term note payable (6 month
maturity) with AP – a foreign Company controlled by Shalom Attia (the brother of
Yossi Attia, the Company CEO – the “Holder”), a third party, for $330,000. The
note bears 12% interest commencing October 1, 2008 and can be converted
(including interest) into common shares of the Company at an established
conversion price of $0.015 per share. Holder has advised that it has no desire
to convert the AP Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.50 per
share at this time as the Company’s current bid and ask is $0.23 and $0.72,
respectively, and there is virtually no liquidity in the Company’s common stock.
The Company is in default on the AP Note, and Holder has threatened to commence
litigation if it not paid in full. The Company does not have the cash resources
to pay off the AP Note due to current capital constraints. Holder has agreed
that it is willing to convert the AP Note if the conversion price is reset to
$0.04376 resulting in the issuance of 8,000,000 shares of common stock (the
“Shares”) of the Company or 7.56% of the Company assuming 105,884,347 shares of
common stock outstanding (97,884,347 as of May 7, 2009 plus 8,000,000 shares
issued to Holder). The parties entered a settlement agreement in May
2009. The agreement with AP was approved by the Board of Directors
where Mr. Yossi Attia has abstained from voting due to a potential conflict of
interest.
On July
15, 2009 TAS which owned Series B preferred shares, converted the Series B
Preferred Shares to 7,500,000 common stock 0.001 par values per
share.
On July
23, 2009, the Company issued 46,460 shares of its common stock 0.001 par value
per share, to Stephen M. Fleming, the Company’s securities counsel pursuant to
the 2008 Employee Stock Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8
Registration.
On August
17, 2009, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with an accredited
investor pursuant to which the investor agreed to acquire up $400,000 in shares
of common stock of the Company at a per share purchase price equal to the
average closing price for the five trading days prior to close. On August 17,
2009, the accredited investor purchased 350,877 restricted shares of common each
at $0.57 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000, which was paid
in cash. On August 31, 2009, the accredited investor purchased an additional
150,060 shares of common stock at $.3332 per share for an aggregate purchase
price of $50,000, which was paid in cash. On September 4, 2009, an accredited
investor purchased 574,718 restricted shares of common each at $.22136 per share
for an aggregate purchase price of $127,219.48, which was paid in cash. The
shares of common stock were offered and sold to the accredited investor in a
private placement transaction made in reliance upon exemptions from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Rule 506
promulgated thereunder. The investor is an accredited investor as defined in
Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of
1933.
On
October 22, 2009, the Company issued Corporate Evolutions, Inc. 500,000 shares
of common stock. Corporate Evolutions, Inc. provides investor relation services
to the Company and is an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501 of
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. The shares were
issued in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2)
under the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Rule 506 promulgated
thereunder.
On or
around October 28, 2009 the Company and all other parties settled the Rusk
dispute for $400,000 to be paid within 75 days from settlement. As the Company
does not have sufficient funds to pay the Settlement Amount, and Emvelco RE
Corp. (“Emvelco RE Corp.”) has agreed indemnify the Company and pay
the Settlement Amount if the Company issues Emvelco RE 4,000,000 shares of
common stock of the Company (the “Shares”)., the Company authorized to issue
Emvelco RE the Shares which shall be issued under Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and which shall be considered validly issued and duly
authorized.
On December 30, 2009, the Company
entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 30,
2009 (the “Agreement”) – See below for details. Pursuant to the Agreement, the
Company agreed to pay the Investor a commitment fee of $250,000 (the “Commitment
Fee”), payable at the earlier of the six monthly anniversary of the execution of
the Agreement or the first tranche. The Company has the right to
elect to pay the Commitment Fee in immediately available funds or by issuance of
shares of Common Stock. As such the Company issued to the Investor 10,000,000
shares of Common Stock of the Company, in a transaction made pursuant to Section
3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On December 30, 2009, the Company
entered into an Exchange Agreement with Moran Atias (“Atias”) whereby the
Company and Ms. Atias exchanged $100,000 of a promissory note in the amount of
$250,000 held by Ms. Atias into 11,903,333 shares of Common Stock of the
Company, in a transaction made pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act
of 1933. The promissory note, of which a portion was converted by Ms.
Atias, was initially issued on August 8, 2008.
On January 20, 2010, the Company, in an
effort to reduce outstanding debt of the Company, entered into an Exchange
Agreement with Moran Atias (“Atias”) whereby the Company and Ms. Atias exchanged
$100,000 of a promissory note in the amount of $150,000 held by Ms. Atias into
13,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company, in a transaction made pursuant
to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933. The promissory
note, of which a portion was converted by Ms. Atias (see above), was initially
issued on August 8, 2008. The Company’s issuance of the
securities described in the preceding sentence is exempt from registration under
the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to the exemption from registration provided
by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for a transaction not
involving a public offering of securities.
On March 23, 2010, the Company issued
8,000,000 shares of its common stock 0.001 par values per share, to Donfeld,
Kelley & Rollman
(“Kelley”), the Company
lawyer, as partial payment for legal fees due. The promissory note, which was
converted by Kelley, was issued on August 30, 2009. The
Company’s issuance of the securities described in the preceding sentence is
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to the
exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933 for a transaction not involving a public offering of
securities
On April 9, 2010, the Company, in an
effort to pay-off outstanding debt of the Company, entered into an Exchange
Agreement with Moran Atias (“Atias”) whereby the Company and Ms. Atias exchanged
$50,000 of a promissory note in the amount of $50,000 held by Ms. Atias into
12,714,286 shares of common stock of the Company, in a transaction made pursuant
to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933. The promissory
note, of which its total balance outstanding was converted by Ms. Atias was
initially issued on August 8, 2008. The Company’s issuance of
the securities described in the preceding sentence is exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to the exemption from registration
provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for a transaction
not involving a public offering of securities.
On April 9, 2010, the Company, in an
effort to pay-off outstanding debt of the Company, entered into an Exchange
Agreement with Priscilla Dunckel (“PD”) whereby the Company and PD exchanged
$20,000 of a promissory note in the amount of $20,000 held by PD into 5,085,714
shares of common stock of the Company, in a transaction made pursuant to Section
3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933. The promissory note, of which
the note was converted by PD was initially issued on August 8,
2008. The Company’s issuance of the securities described in the
preceding sentence is exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933
pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933 for a transaction not involving a public offering of
securities.
Preferred
Stock:
Series A
- As disclosed in Form 8-Ks filed on May 7, 2008 and May 9, 2008, on May 1,
2008, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Exchange (the "DCG
Agreement") with DCG and the members of DCG Members. Pursuant to the DCG
Agreement, the Company acquired and, the DCG Members sold, 100% of the
outstanding securities in DCG. DCG is a limited liability company organized
under the laws of the State of Nevada and headquartered in Bel Air; California
is a newly formed designated LLC which holds certain development rights for gas
drilling in Crockett County, Texas. In consideration for 100% of the
outstanding securities in DCG, the Company issued the DCG Members promissory
notes in the aggregate amount of $25,000,000 payable together with interest in
May 2010 (the "DCG Notes"). On August 1, 2008, all holders of the Company’s
preferred stock Series A, notified the Company of their intention to convert
said 100,000 preferred stock into 500,000 common shares of the Company. The
conversion of preferred shares to common shares marks the completion of the
acquisition of DCG. The Company accepted such notice and instructed the
Company’s transfer agent on August 15, 2008 to issue said common shares to the
former members of DCG, as reported and detailed on the Company’s 14A
filings.
Series B
- On December 5, 2008 the Company entered into and closed end Agreement with
T.A.S. Holdings Limited ("TAS") (the "TAS Agreement") pursuant to which TAS
agreed to cancel the debt payable by the Company to TAS in the amount of
approximately $1,065,000 and its 150,000 shares of common stock it presently
holds in consideration of the Company issuing TAS 1,000,000 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock, which such shares carry a stated value equal to
$1.20 per share (the "Series B Stock"). The Series B Stock is convertible, at
any time at the option of the holder, into common shares of the Company based on
a conversion price of $0.0016 per share. The Series B Stock shall have voting
rights on an as converted basis multiplied by 6.25. Holders of the Series B
Stock are entitled to receive, when declared by the Company's board of
directors, annual dividends of $0.06 per share of Series B Stock paid
semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 commencing June 30, 2009. In the event
of any liquidation or winding up of the Company, the holders of Series B Stock
will be entitled to receive, in preference to holders of common stock, an amount
equal to the stated value plus interest of 15% per year. The Series B Stock
restricts the ability of the holder to convert the Series B Stock and receive
shares of the Company's common stock such that the number of shares of the
Company common stock held by TAS and its affiliates after such conversion does
not exceed 4.9% of the Company's then issued and outstanding shares of common
stock. The Series B Stock was offered and sold to TAS in a private placement
transaction made in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 promulgated there
under. TAS is an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. The Company filed its Certificate
of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Preferred
Stock with the State of Delaware. The preferred shares were subsequently
converted to 7,500,000 shares of common stock and are included in the EPS
calculation.
Series C - On November 26, 2009, the
Company issued 210,087 shares of Series C Preferred Stock for aggregate
consideration of $4,945. Each six shares of Series C Preferred Stock
is convertible into one share of common stock; provided, however, in the event
that the shares of Series C Preferred Stock have been outstanding for a period
of one year, then it shall be automatically converted into shares of common
stock in accordance with the aforementioned conversion formula. The
Company issued the securities to one non-U.S. persons (as that term is defined
in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction
relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of
1933.
Series D – Not issued yet - On
December 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase
Agreement dated as of December 30, 2009 (the “Agreement”) with Socius
Capital Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company d/b/a Socius Life
Sciences Capital Group, LLC including its designees, successors and assigns (the
“Investor”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company will issue to the Investor
up to $5,000,000 of the Company’s newly created Series D Preferred Stock (the
“Preferred Stock”). The purchase price of the Preferred Stock is $10,000 per
share. The shares of Preferred Stock that are issued to the Investor will bear a
cumulative dividend of 10.0% per annum, payable in shares of Preferred
Stock, will be redeemable under certain circumstances and will not be
convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Common Stock”).
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the Company has the right
to determine (1) the number of shares of Preferred Stock that it will
require the Investor to purchase from the Company, up to a maximum purchase
price of $5,000,000, (2) whether it will require the Investor to purchase
Preferred Stock in one or more tranches, and (3) the timing of such
required purchase or purchases of Preferred Stock. The terms of the Preferred
Stock are set forth in a Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and
Limitations of Series D Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock Certificate”) that
the Company filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 18,
2009. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company agreed to pay the Investor a
commitment fee of $250,000 (the “Commitment Fee”), payable at the earlier of the
six monthly anniversary of the execution of the Agreement or the first
tranche. The Company has the right to elect to pay the Commitment Fee
in immediately available funds or by issuance of shares of Common Stock.
Concurrently with its execution of the Agreement, the Company issued to the
Investor a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase shares of Common Stock with an
aggregate exercise price of up to $6,750,000 depending upon the amount of
Preferred Stock that is purchased by the Investor. Each time that the Company
requires the Investor to purchase shares of Preferred Stock, a portion of the
Warrant will become exercisable by the Investor over a five-year period for a
number of shares of Common Stock equal to (1) the aggregate purchase price
payable by the Investor for such shares of Preferred Stock multiplied by 135%,
with such amount divided by (2) the per share Warrant exercise price. The
initial exercise price under the Warrant is $0.022 per share of Common Stock.
Thereafter, the exercise price for each portion of the Warrant that becomes
exercisable upon the Company’s election to require the Investor to purchase
Preferred Stock will equal the closing price of the Common Stock on the date
that the Company delivers its election notice. The Investor is entitled to pay
the Warrant exercise price in immediately available funds, by delivery of cash,
a secured promissory note or, if a registration statement covering the resale of
the Common Stock subject to the Warrant is not in effect, on a cashless basis.
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company agreed to file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission a registration statement covering the resale of the shares
of Common Stock that are issuable to the Investor under the Warrant and in
satisfaction of the Commitment Fee.
Series E – Not issued yet – On April
15, 2010 the Company’s Board of Directors
approved settlement agreement with Trafalgar effective December 31, 2009
(see Item III – Legal Proceedings). The parties agreed that the debts owe to
Trafalgar will be set as $3,000,000 with maturity of 30 months from date of
issuing carry a 7% annual interest. Via mechanism of Preferred Stocks, the debt
is Convertible at the Option of the Holders, into Six Hundred Million (six
hundred million) common shares of the Company, at any time upon written notice
to the company (The parties
acknowledged that the Company does not have sufficient authorized shares to
affect said conversion).
Treasury
Stock Repurchase
In
June 2006, the Company's Board of Directors approved a program to repurchase,
from time to time, at management's discretion, up to 700,000 shares of the
Company's common stock in the open market or in private transactions commencing
on June 20, 2006 and continuing through December 15, 2006 at prevailing market
prices. Repurchases will be made under the program using our own cash resources
and will be in accordance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and other applicable laws, rules and regulations. A licensed Stock Broker
Firm is acting as agent for our stock repurchase program. Pursuant to the
unanimous consent of the Board of Directors in September 2006, the number of
shares that may be purchased under the Repurchase Program was increased from
700,000 to 1,500,000 shares of common stock and the Repurchase Program was
extended until October 1, 2007, or until the increased amount of shares is
purchased. On November 20, 2008, the Company issued a press release announcing
that its Board of Directors has approved a share repurchase program. Under the
program the Company is authorized to purchase up to ten million of its shares of
common stock in open market transactions at the discretion of management. All
stock repurchases will be subject to the requirements of Rule 10b-18 under the
Exchange Act and other rules that govern such purchases.
As of
September 30, 2009 the Company had 1,000 treasury shares in its possession
scheduled to be cancelled.
Pursuant
to the Sale Agreement of Navigator, the Company got on closing (February 2,
2007) 622,531 shares of the Company’s common stock as partial consideration. The
Company shares were valued at $1.34 per share, representing the closing price of
the Company on the NASDAQ Capital Market on February 16, 2007, the closing of
the sale. The Company canceled the common stock acquired during the disposition
in the amount of $834,192. All, the Company 660,362 treasury shares were retired
and canceled during August and September 2008.
On
November 20, 2008, the Company issued a press release announcing that its Board
of Directors has approved a share repurchase program. Under the program the
Company is authorized to purchase up to 100,000 of its shares of common stock in
open market transactions at the discretion of management. All stock repurchases
will be subject to the requirements of Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act and
other rules that govern such purchases.
As of
December 31, 2009 the Company has 1,000 treasury shares in its possession (which
been purchased in the open market per the above program) scheduled to be
cancelled.
As a
smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are
not required to provide the information required by this Item.
Item
7.
|
Management’s
Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of
Operations
|
The
following discussion of the results of our operations and financial condition
should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related
notes, which appear elsewhere in this annual report.
Results
of Operations
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
Due to
the new financial investment in developing a logistics center in 2009, and the
discontinuation of Gas and Oil activity, which commenced in May 2008, the
consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 are not comparable. This section of the report, should be read together
with Notes of the Company consolidated financials especially - Change in the Reporting
Entity: In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards, FAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections , when an accounting change results in financial statements
that are, in effect, the statements of a different reporting entity, the change
shall be retrospectively applied to the financial statements of all prior
periods presented to show financial information for the new reporting entity for
those periods. Previously issued interim financial information shall be
presented on a retrospective basis.
The
consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 are compared (subject to the above description) in the sections
below:
Revenues
The
following table summarizes our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
2008:
Year
ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
There was
a sale of a property in 2008. Since the board resolved to discontinue real
estate operations during 2008, revenues of $1,990,000 from the real estate
property are included as part of discontinued operations for years ended
December 31, 2008
Cost
of revenues
The
following table summarizes our cost of revenues for the year ended December 31,
2009 and 2008:
Year
ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Total
cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Since the
board resolved to discontinue real estate operations during 2008, cost of sales
of $2,221,929 for the real estate property are included as part of discontinued
operations for the year ended December 31, 2008
Compensation
and related costs
The
following table summarizes our compensation and related costs for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008:
Year
ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Compensation
and related costs
|
|
$
|
410,156
|
|
|
$
|
558,073
|
|
Overall
compensation and related costs decreased by about 27%, or $147,917, primarily as
the result of reduction of employees.
Consulting,
professional and director fees
The
following table summarizes our consulting, professional and director fees for
the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
Year
ended December 31
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Consulting,
professional and director fees
|
|
$
|
790,373
|
|
|
$
|
13,049,759
|
|
Overall
consulting, professional and director fees decreased by about 94%, or
$12,259,386, primarily as the result of a fee charge of $9,782,768 to C.
Properties as a fee associated with the DCG transaction and a $2,108,161 charge
to stock compensation expense for various grants of shares and warrants in
relation to the cost of several consultants, investment bankers, advisors,
accounting and lawyers fee in 2008. These charges did not occur in
2009.
Other
selling, general and administrative expenses
The
following table summarizes our other selling, general and administrative
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
Year
ended December 31
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Other
selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
203,670
|
|
|
$
|
413,576
|
|
Other
selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by 51%, or $209,906, from
2008 to 2009. This change is due to management resizing its business,
changing its business model, and reducing its employees. Since the
board resolved to discontinue real estate operations during 2008, other selling,
general and administrative expenses of $0 for the real estate properties
are included as part of discontinued operations for the years ended December 31,
2008.
Goodwill
impairment
The
following table summarizes our goodwill impairment fees for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008:
Year
ended December 31
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
34,490,000
|
|
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, an analysis was performed on the goodwill
associated with the investment in DCG that occurred during the year (which was
booked against Equity), and an impairment expense was charged against the
P&L for $34,490,000 million.
Depreciation
and amortization
The
following table summarizes our depreciation and amortization for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008:
Year
ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
There is
no depreciation expense in the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 due to the
capitalization of depreciation into the Investment in Land Development accounts
for the majority owned subsidiary.
The
following table summarizes our other expenses for the year ended December 31,
2009 and 2008:
Year
ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Other
expenses
|
|
$
|
348,240
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
These
expenses in 2009, which did not occur in 2008, are direct expenses incurred in
connection with the Yasheng transaction, the outcome of which is currently
uncertain.
Net
interest income (expense)
The
following table summarizes our net interest income for the year ended December
31, 2009 and 2008:
Year
ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
$
|
171,567
|
|
|
$
|
729,097
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
$
|
(3,280,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,922,983)
|
|
Net
interest income (expense)
|
|
$
|
(3,449,164
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,193,886)
|
|
The
decrease in interest income is attributable to the Company having sold its real
estate assets in 2008, thereby reducing the Company’s base of properties which
entitled it to receive interest income in 2008.
The
increase in interest expense is primarily due to on the issuance of notes
payable during 2008 and 2009. On the other hand, the line of credit
was paid back during 2008, and short-term borrowing overall has decreased
sharply from 2008 to 2009. Some stock was issued during 2009, and
management will seek to exploit equity financing as opposed to debt going
forward wherever possible and feasible. The interest expense in 2009
also includes the discount portion of the seller’s note issued in connection
with the sale of the DCG wells, which was issued at face value. The
discount under that note was computed at the Company’s approximate cost of
borrowing, 12%.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
December 31, 2009, our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were
$85,789 (in 2008 it was $123,903), a decrease of approximately $38,114 from the
end of fiscal year 2008. The decrease in our cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities is primarily the result of pay-off bank loans and
conversion of notes payable, and also cash was used to operate our
business.
Cash flow
used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $690,279,
and cash flow used by operating activities in 2008 was
$230,983. Although the net loss was much larger in 2008 than in 2009,
much of that net loss in 2008 was the (non-cash) 35MM goodwill impairment of the
DCG wells (discontinued operations). As previously noted, however,
the operations of the Company are not truly comparable between 2008 and 2009,
due to the changed business model.
Cash flow
provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
$25,000 and cash flow used by investing activities in 2008 was $327,102. The
change was primarily due to the reduction in 2008 of loan advances to ERC and
Verge.
Cash
provided by financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2009 was
$627,165, and cash flow used by financing activities was $341,792 for the year
ended December 31, 2008. This change is mainly due to the repayment of a bank
loan in 2008.
The
Company held restricted Certificate of Deposits (CD) with the Bank to access a
revolving line of credit. These deposits are interest bearing and approximated
$4.196 million as of September 30, 2008. On November 8, 2007, the lines of
credits were increased and extended as the following: $4,180,000 until October
16, 2008 and $4,229,000 until September 1, 2008. Both lines bear interest of
5.87% and are secured by restricted cash deposited in CD’s with the bank.
On August 2008, the company notified the bank, not to extend the deposits,
and pay it off from the CD. In the event the Company makes future acquisitions
or investments, additional bank loans or fund raising may be used to finance
such future acquisitions. The Company may consider the sale of non-strategic
assets. The Company currently anticipates that its available cash resources will
not be sufficient to meet its prior anticipated working capital requirements,
though it will be sufficient manage the existing business of the Company without
further development.
Plan
of operation
The
Company intends to continue to develop its logistics center with or without the
continued support and involvement of Yasheng. Its efforts will be
focused on obtaining the required financing to develop the center, selecting the
appropriate facility for lease and commencing sales. Per Yasheng’s cancellation
of the Exchange Agreement (see above) there is no guarantee that the Company
will be able to successfully develop its logistic center.
The above
efforts are subject to obtaining adequate financing on acceptable terms. The
Company anticipates that it will be spending approximately $2,000,000 over the
next 12 month period pursuing its stated plan. The Company’s present cash
reserves and monetary assets are not sufficient to carry out its plan of
operation without substantial additional financing. The Company is currently
attempting to arrange for financing through mezzanine arrangements, debt or
equity that would enable it to proceed with its plan of investment
operation. (See above – Preferred Shares Series D) However,
there is no guarantee that we will be able to close such financing transaction
or, if financing is available, that the terms will be acceptable to the
Company.
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative
And Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
As a
smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are
not required to provide the information required by this Item.
Item
8.
|
Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.
|
The
audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, are included herein beginning with the
index hereto on page F-1
..
Item
9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting And Financial
Disclosure
|
None.
The term
disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an
issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (15
U.S.C. 78a, et seq.) is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified
in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The term
internal control over financial reporting is defined as a process designed by,
or under the supervision of, the issuer’s principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the
issuer’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and
procedures that:
·
|
Pertain
to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
issuer;
|
·
|
Provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the issuer; and
|
·
|
Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Our
management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial
officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our
internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated,
can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the
control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of
inherent limitations in all control systems, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements, and no evaluation of controls
can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud,
if any, within the registrant have been detected. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
Evaluation of Disclosure and
Controls and Procedures. Our management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. We carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. The
evaluation was undertaken in consultation with our accounting
personnel. Based on that evaluation and for the reasons set forth
below, our chief executive officer and principal financial officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures are currently not effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms.
Management’s Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting of the Company. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and
procedures may deteriorate.
Management,
with the participation of our principal executive officer, financial and
accounting officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations . Based on this evaluation, because of the Company’s
limited resources and limited number of employees, management concluded that, as
of December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial reporting is
not effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures is the result of certain deficiencies in internal controls that
constitute material weaknesses as discussed below. The material weaknesses
identified did not result in the restatement of any previously reported
financial statements or any other related financial disclosure, nor does
management believe that it had any effect on the accuracy of the Company's
financial statements for the current reporting period. We lack segregation of
duties in the period-end financial reporting process. The Company has
historically had limited accounting and minimal operating revenue and, as such,
all accounting and financial reporting operations have been and are currently
performed by one individual. The party that performs the accounting
and financial reporting operations is the only individual with any significant
knowledge of generally accepted accounting principles. The person is
also in charge of the general ledger (including the preparation of routine and
non-routine journal entries and journal entries involving accounting estimates),
the selection of accounting principles, and the preparation of interim and
annual financial statements (including report combinations, consolidation
entries and footnote disclosures) in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. In addition, the lack of additional staff with
significant knowledge of generally accepted accounting principles has resulted
in ineffective oversight and monitoring. The company intends to add
accounting staff, subject to adequate financing, in order to assist in reducing
its risk in these areas and plans to add additional personnel in accounting and
internal auditing in the near future, which is subject to obtaining the required
financing.
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered
public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered
public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the
Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
Changes in internal
controls
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified
in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or
15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the year ended December 31,
2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
PART
III
|
Directors, Executive Officers
and Corporate Governance.
|
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the executive officers
and directors of the Company as of December 31, 2009:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position with Company
|
Yossi
Attia
|
|
48
|
|
Director,
Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stewart
Reich
|
|
66
|
|
Director
and Audit and Compensation Committees Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald
Schaffer
|
|
86
|
|
Director
and Audit and Compensation Committee’s
member
|
Alison M.
Moses
|
|
43
|
|
Secretary
(*)
|
Directors
are elected annually and hold office until the next annual meeting of the
stockholders of the Company and until their successors are elected. Officers are
elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors.
Yossi Attia has been self
employed as a real estate developer since 2000. Mr. Attia was appointed to the
Board of Directors (“Board”) on February 1, 2005, as CEO of ERC on June 15, 2006
and as the CEO and President of the Company on August 14, 2006. Prior to
entering into the real estate development industry, Mr. Attia served as the
Senior Vice President of Investments of Interfirst Capital from 1996 to 2000.
From 1994 through 1996, Mr. Attia was a Senior Vice President of Investments
with Sutro & Co. and from 1992 through 1994. Mr. Attia served as the Vice
President of Investments of Prudential Securities. Mr. Attia received a Bachelor
of Arts (“BA”) in economics and marketing from Haifa University in 1987 and
a Masters of Business Administration (“MBA”) from Pepperdine University in
1995. Mr. Attia held Series 7 and 63 securities licenses from 1991 until 2002.
Effective March 21, 2005, Mr. Attia was appointed as a member of the Audit
Committee and the Compensation Committee. In June 2006, Mr. Attia was appointed
as the CEO of ERC. Upon his appointment as the CEO of ERC, Mr. Attia was not
considered an independent Director. Consequently, Mr. Attia resigned from all
committees. In August 2006, Mr. Attia was appointed as the CEO and President of
the Company. Upon closing the acquisition of AGL Mr. Attia was appointed as the
CEO of AGL. Mr. Yossi Attia serves as chairmen of the board of AGL.
Stewart Reich, was Chairman of
the Board since June 2004 until August 2008, was CEO and President of Golden
Telecom Inc., Russia’s largest alternative voice and data service provider as
well as its largest ISP, since 1997. In September 1992, Mr. Reich was employed
as Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) at UTEL (Ukraine Telecommunications), of
which he was appointed President in November 1992. Prior to that, Mr. Reich held
various positions at a number of subsidiaries of AT&T Corp. Mr. Reich have
been a Director of the Company since 2002. Mr. Reich is head of the Audit and
the Compensation Committees.
Gerald Schaffer was
unanimously appointed to the Board of Directors of the Company on June 22, 2006,
as well as a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Schaffer has
been extensively active in corporate, community, public, and government affairs
for many years, having served on numerous governmental boards and authorities,
as well as public service agencies, including his current twenty-one year
membership on the Board of Directors for the American Lung Association of
Nevada. Additionally, Mr. Schaffer is a past member of the Clark County
Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee, as well as a former Commissioner for
Public Housing on the Clark County Housing Authority. For many years he served
as a Planning Commissioner for the Clark County Planning Commission, which
included the sprawling Las Vegas Strip. His tenure on these various governmental
entities was enhanced by his extensive knowledge of the federal government. Mr.
Schaffer is Chairman Emeritus of the Windsor Group and a founding member of both
Windsor and its affiliate - Gold Eagle Gaming. Over the years the principals of
Windsor have developed shopping and marketing centers, office complexes,
hotel/casinos, apartments, residential units and a wide variety of large land
parcels. Mr. Schaffer continues to have an active daily role in many of these
subsidiary interests. He is also President of the Barclay Corporation, a
professional consulting service, as well as the Barclay Development Corporation,
dealing primarily in commercial land acquisitions and sales. Mr. Schaffer
resides in Nevada and oversees the Company’s interest in the Verge project,
specifically with compliance and obtaining governmental licensing.
Alison M.
Moses has over 15 years of
senior level paralegal experience with significant experience in corporate,
finance and bankruptcy transactions and additional expertise with filings
related to the Securities and Exchange Commission Blue Sky and state, county and
local licensing and compliance regulatory agencies. Ms. Moses began
her career at Countrywide Home Loans as a Senior Licensing Administrator in
March 1992 where she remained until April of 1997. From April 1997
through July 2000, Ms. Moses worked for IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. holding the
positions of Senior Licensing Paralegal and Corporate, Business & Finance
Paralegal. From July 2000 until January 2002 Ms. Moses remained at
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP in the position of Corporate, Business &
Finance Paralegal. In July 2002, Ms. Moses became Professional Legal
Assistant at the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, where she worked until
August of 2005. From August 2005 through March 2006, Ms. Moses was
employed at Jones Day as a Senior Corporate Paralegal and from the years March
2006 until September 2008 she held the title of Senior Corporate Paralegal at
the firm of Heller Ehrman LLP. In September 2008, Ms. Moses accepted
a position as Senior Corporate Paralegal at the law firm of Paul, Hastings,
Janofsky & Walker LLP where she remained until moving onto to the Law
Offices of Robert M. Yaspan as a Senior Corporate & Bankruptcy Paralegal,
where she is currently employed.
*) Robin Ann Gorelick from
1992 to the present, has served as the Managing Partner at the Law Offices of
Gorelick & Associates, specializing in the representation of various public
and private business entities. Ms. Gorelick received her Juris Doctor (“JD”) and
her BA in economics and political science from the University of California, Los
Angeles in 1982 and 1979, respectively. Ms. Gorelick is admitted to practice law
in California, the District of Columbia and Texas. On October 4, 2007, Robin
Gorelick, resigned as a director of Emvelco the Company. Ms. Gorelick continues
to act as general counsel and corporate secretary for the Company. On December 30, 2009, Robin Ann Gorelick
resigned as Corporate Secretary of the Company. There is no
disagreement known to any executive officer of the Company between the Company
and Ms. Gorelick on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or
practices. The Board of Directors then appointed Alison M. Moses as
Secretary of the Company.
Mace Miller was appointed
on July 28, 2008
as a director of the Company, received his BBA in Accounting and an MBA with
International Concentration from the University of Texas at El Paso in 1989 and
1992, respectively. Further, Mr. Mace received his law degree from the
University of Texas at El Paso in 1992. From 2001 to 2006, Mr. Miller has been a
principal with Raymond James Financial Services. Mr. Miller, since 2006, has
been a partner with Coronado Capital Advisers, where he has been responsible for
the administration and creation of proprietary hedge fund. He has been a
frequent speaker at various international venues, including the Raymond James
National Conference, on tax mitigation and anti-money laundering issues related
to hedge funds. Recognized as an expert in international finance, Mr. Miller has
consulted on numerous bond offerings in the United States and the Dominican
Republic on behalf of institutions and investors alike. Mr. Miller is a licensed
Attorney with the State of Texas. Mr. Miller resigned as a director on October
7, 2009. There is no disagreement
known to any executive officer of the Company between the Company and Mr. Miller
on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or
practices
ROLE
OF THE BOARD
Pursuant
to Delaware law, our business, property and affairs are managed under the
direction of the Board. The Board has responsibility for establishing broad
corporate policies and for the overall performance and direction of Vortex, but
is not involved in day-to-day operations. Members of the Board keep informed of
the business by participating in Board and committee meetings, by reviewing
analyses and reports sent to them regularly, and through discussions with the
executive officers.
2009
BOARD MEETINGS
In 2009,
the Board had 4 meetings telephonically and 17 meetings through unanimous
written consents and additional resolutions. No director attended less than 75%
of all of the combined total meetings of the Board and the committees on which
they served in 2009.
The Board
has determined that Messrs Reich, Miller and Schaffer, are independent directors
as such term is defined in rule 4200(a) (15) of the listing standards of the
National Association of Securities Dealers.
Audit
Committee Financial Expert
The Board
has determined that Mr. Reich qualifies as “audit committee financial expert” as
such term is defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K, and is independent as
defined in rule 4200(a) (15) of the listing standards of the National
Association of Securities Dealers..
BOARD
COMMITTEES
Audit
Committee
The Audit
Committee of the Board reviews the internal accounting procedures of the Company
and consults with and reviews the services provided by our independent
accountants. The Audit Committee consists of Gerald Schaffer, Stewart Reich and
Mace Miller is independent members of the Board. The Audit Committee held 4
meetings in 2009.
The audit
committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with
management; the audit committee has discussed with the independent auditors the
matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted
by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T; and the audit
committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the
independent accountants required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1
(Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with
Audit Committees), as adopted by the Public Company.
Compensation Committee
The
Compensation Committee of the Board performs the following: i) reviews and
recommends to the Board the compensation and benefits of our executive officers;
ii) administers the stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan; and
iii) establishes and reviews general policies relating to compensation and
employee benefits. The Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs Reich,
Schaffer and Miller. No interlocking relationships exist between the Board or
Compensation Committee and the Board or Compensation Committee of any other
company. During the past fiscal year the Compensation Committee met 4
times.
SECTION
16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP COMPLIANCE
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s Directors
and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10 percent of the
Company’s common stock, to file with the SEC the initial reports of ownership
and reports of changes in ownership of common stock. Officers, Directors and
greater than 10 percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish
the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Specific
due dates for such reports have been established by the SEC and the Company is
required to disclose in this Proxy Statement any failure to file reports by such
dates during fiscal 2007. Based solely on its review of the copies of such
reports received by it, or written representations from certain reporting
persons that no Forms 5 were required for such persons, the Company believes
that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, there was no failure to
comply with Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers,
Directors and ten percent stockholders.
POLICY
WITH RESPECT TO SECTION 162(m)
Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), provides
that, unless an appropriate exemption applies, a tax deduction for the Company
for compensation of certain executive officers named in the Summary Compensation
Table will not be allowed to the extent such compensation in any taxable year
exceeds $1 million. As no executive officer of the Company received compensation
during 2008 approaching $1 million, and the Company does not believe that any
executive officer’s compensation is likely to exceed $1 million in 2009, the
Company has not developed an executive compensation policy with respect to
qualifying compensation paid to its executive officers for deductibility under
Section 162(m) of the Code.
CODE OF ETHICS
The
Company has adopted its Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for Officers,
Directors and Employees that applies to all of the officers, Directors and
employees of the Company, which is currently not available on the Company’s
website. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics may be obtained from
the Company, free of charge, upon written request to the Company
Secretary.
Item
11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
The
following table sets forth the cash compensation (including cash bonuses) paid
or accrued and equity awards granted by us for years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 to the Company’s CEO and our most highly compensated officers other than
the CEO at December 31, 2009 and 2008 whose total compensation exceeded
$100,000.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
Name
& Principal Position
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards ($)
|
|
All
Other Compensation ($)
|
Total
($)
|
Yossi
Attia
|
2009
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
$360,000
|
|
2008
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
$360,000
|
Robin
Gorelick
|
2009
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
$77,000
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
168,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
24,048
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
$192,048
|
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS
Option
Awards
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
|
|
Yossi
Attia (1)
|
|
|
1,000
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
|
03/12/2011
|
|
|
--
|
(3)
|
$
|
--
|
(3)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1)
|
Mr.
Attia was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company on August
14, 2006.
|
(2)
|
On
March 22, 2005, the Company granted 1,000 options to Yossi Attia. The
stock options granted vest at the rate of 250 options on each September 22
of 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The exercise price of the
options ($3.40) is equal to the market price on the date the options were
granted.
|
(3)
|
In
accordance with Mr. Attia’s employment agreement, Mr. Attia was entitled
to receive 111,458 shares of common stock for the first year. No shares
have been issued and Mr. Attia has waived his right to these
shares.
|
Except as
set forth above, no other named executive officer has received an equity
award.
The
following table sets forth with respect to the named Director, compensation
information inclusive of equity awards and payments made in the year end
December 31, 2009.
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or Paid in Cash
|
|
Fees
Earned or Accrued but not Paid in Cash
|
|
Stewart
Reich
|
|
$
|
---
|
|
$
|
57,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald
Schaffer
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
50,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
---
|
|
|
$
|
107,508
|
|
OPTIONS/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL
YEAR
There
were no other grants of Stock Options/SAR made during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009.
AGGREGATED
OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND YEAR-END OPTION/SAR
VALUES
Name
|
|
Shares
acquired on exercise (#)
|
|
Value
realized ($)
|
|
Number
of securities
underlying
unexercised
options/SARs
at FY-end (#)
Exercisable/
Unexercisable
|
|
Value
of the unexercised in the money options/SARs at FY-end ($)*
Exercisable/
Unexercisable
|
|
Yossi
Attia, CEO, Director
|
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
1,000
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
* Fair
market value of underlying securities (calculated by subtracting the exercise
price of the options from the closing price of the Company’s common stock quoted
on the OTC as of December 31, 2009, which was about $0.023 per share. None of
Mr. Attia’s options are presently in the money.
Effective
July 1, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with
Yossi Attia as the President and provides for annual compensation in the amount
of $240,000, an annual bonus not less than $120,000 per year, and an annual car
allowance. On August 14, 2006, the Company amended the agreement to provide that
Mr. Attia shall serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company for a term
of two years commencing August 14, 2006 and granting annual compensation of
$250,000 to be paid in the form of Company shares of common stock. The number of
shares to be received by Mr. Attia is calculated based on the average closing
price 10 days prior to the commencement of each employment year. Mr. Attia has
waived his rights to these shares.
On August
19, 2008, the Company entered into that certain Employment Agreement with Mike
Mustafoglu, effective July 1, 2008, pursuant to which Mr. Mustafoglu agreed to
serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company for a period of
five years. Mr. Mustafoglu will receive (i) a salary of $240,000; (ii) a
performance bonus of 10% of net income before taxes, which will be allocated by
Mr. Mustafoglu and other key executives at the sole discretion of Mr.
Mustafoglu; and (iii) a warrant to purchase 10 million shares of common stock of
the Company at an exercise price equal to the lesser of $.50 or 50%
of the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the 20 day
period prior to exercise on a cashless basis (the “Mustafoglu Warrant”). The
Mustafoglu Warrant shall be released from escrow on an equal basis over the
employment period of five years. As a result, 2,000,000 shares of the Mustafoglu
Warrant will vest per year. Effective July 16, 2008, the Board of
Directors of the Company approved that certain Mergers and Acquisitions
Consulting Agreement (the “M&A Agreement”) between the Company and
TransGlobal Financial LLC, a California limited liability company
(“TransGlobal”). Pursuant to the M&A Agreement, TransGlobal agreed to assist
the Company in the identification, evaluation, structuring, negotiation and
closing of business acquisitions for a term of five years. As compensation for
entering into the M&A Agreement, TransGlobal shall receive a 20% carried
interest in any transaction introduced by TransGlobal to the Company that is
closed by the Company. At TransGlobal’s election, such compensation may be paid
in restricted shares of common stock of the Company equal to 20% of the
transaction value. Mike Mustafoglu, who is the Chairman of TransGlobal
Financial, was elected on July 28, 2008 at a special shareholder meeting as the
Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors. On December 24, 2008,
Mr. Mustafoglu resigned as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Company to
pursue other business interests. Further, that certain Mergers and Acquisitions
Consulting Agreement between the Company and TransGlobal was terminated. Mr.
Mustafoglu is the Chairman of TransGlobal
The board
of directors of AGL approved an employment agreement between the Company and Mr.
Shalom Attia, the controlling shareholder and CEO of AP Holdings
Ltd. The agreement goes into effect on the date that the
aforementioned allotments are consummated and stipulates that Mr. Shalom Attia
will serve as the VP – European Operations of AGL in return for a salary that
costs the Company an amount of US$ 10 thousand a month. Mr. Attia is
also entitled to reimbursement of expenses in connection with the affairs of the
Company, in accordance with Company policy, as set from time to
time. In addition, Mr. Shalom Attia is entitled to an annual bonus of
2.5% of the net, pre-tax income of AGL in excess of NIS 8 million. The agreement
was ratified by the general shareholders meeting of AGL on 30 October
2007.
Effective
July 1, 2006, Verge entered into a non written year employment agreement with
Darren C Dunckel as the President of Verge which commenced on July 11, 2006 and
provides for annual compensation in the amount of $120,000, the employment
expense which was capitalized related to such agreement was $120,000 for each
year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Mr. Dunckel subsequently
resigned as a director of the Company and Verge was disposed of.
The
Company has no pension or profit sharing plan or other contingent forms of
remuneration with any officer, Director, employee or consultant, although
bonuses are paid to some individuals.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Before
June 11, 2006, Directors who are also officers of the Company were not
separately compensated for their services as a Director. Directors who were not
officers received cash compensation for their services: $2,000 at the time of
agreeing to become a Director; $2,000 for each Board Meeting attended either in
person or by telephone; and $1,000 for each Audit and Compensation Committee
Meeting attended either in person or by telephone. Non-employee Directors were
reimbursed for their expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of
the Board or any committee on which they served and were eligible to receive
awards under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Plan. The Board has
approved the modification of Directors’ compensation on its special meeting held
on June 11, 2006. Directors who are also officers of the Company are not
separately compensated for their services as a Director. Directors who are not
officers receive cash compensation for their services as follows: $40,000 per
year and an additional $5,000 if they sit on a committee and an additional
$5,000 if they sit as the head of such committee. Non-employee directors are
reimbursed for their expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of
the Board or any committee on which they serve and are eligible to receive
awards under our 2004 Incentive Plan. During 2008 the Board modified its
member’s compensation to include only compensation only to committee’s member
that was appointed by the prior board, as following: each member: $4,167 per
month and chairman $4,792 per month.
STOCK
OPTION PLAN
2004
Incentive Plan
a) Stock
option plans
In 2004,
the Board of Directors established the “2004 Incentive Plan” (“the Plan”), with
an aggregate of 800,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the
Plan. The Plan was approved by the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders in
May 2004. In 2005, the Plan was adjusted to increase the number of shares of
common stock issuable under such plan from 800,000 shares to 1,200,000 shares.
The adjustment was approved at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders in
June 2005. The Plan provides that incentive and nonqualified options may be
granted to key employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company for
the purpose of providing an incentive to those persons. The Plan may be
administered by either the Board of Directors or a committee of two directors
appointed by the Board of Directors (the “Committee”). The Board of Directors or
Committee determines, among other things, the persons to whom stock options are
granted, the number of shares subject to each option, the date or dates upon
which each option may be exercised and the exercise price per share. Options
granted under the Plan are generally exercisable for a period of up to ten years
from the date of grant. Incentive options granted to stockholders that hold
in excess of 10% of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of
stock of the Company must have an exercise price of not less than 110% of the
fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of the grant. The Company
will not grant a nonqualified option with an exercise price less than 85% of the
fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the
grant.
The
Company has granted the following options under the Plan:
On April
26, 2004, the Company granted 125,000 options to its Chief Executive Officer, an
aggregate of 195,000 options to five employees and an aggregate of 45,000
options to two consultants of the Company (which do not qualify as employees).
The stock options granted to the Chief Executive Officer vest at the rate of
31,250 options on November 1, 2004, October 1, 2005, October 1, 2006 and October
1, 2007. The stock options granted to the other employees and consultants vest
at the rate of 80,000 options on November 1, 2004, October 1, 2005 and October
1, 2006. The exercise price of the options ($4.78) was equal to the market price
on the date of grant. The options granted to the Chief Executive Officer were
forfeited/ cancelled in August 2006 due to the termination of his employment. Of
the 195,000 options originally granted to employees, 60,000 options were
forfeited or cancelled during 2005, while the remaining 135,000 options were
forfeited or cancelled in August 2006 due to termination of the five employee
contracts. 15,000 options granted to one of the consultants were also forfeited
or cancelled in April 2006 due to the termination of the consultant’s
contract.
Through
December 31, 2005, the Company did not recognize compensation expense under APB
25 for the options granted to the Chief Executive Officer and the five employees
as the options had a zero intrinsic value at the date of grant. The adoption of
SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 resulted in a compensation charge of $36,817 and
$21,241 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
In
accordance with SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 123R, and EITF Issue No. 96-18,
“Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for
Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”, the Company
computed total compensation charges of $162,000 for the grants made to the two
consultants. Such compensation charges are recognized over the vesting period of
three years. Compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 was
$9,921.
On March
22, 2005, the Company granted an aggregate of 200,000 options to two of the
Company’s Directors. These stock options vest at the rate of 50,000 options on
each September 22 of 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The exercise price
of the options ($3.40) was equal to the market price on the date the options
were granted. Through December 31, 2005, the Company did not recognize
compensation expense under APB 25 as the options had a zero intrinsic value at
the date of grant. The adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 resulted in a
compensation charge of $36,817 and $128,284 for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. One of the directors was elected as Chief Executive
Officer from August 14, 2006.
On June
2, 2005, the Company granted 100,000 options to a director of the Company, which
vests at the rate of 25,000 options on December 2 of 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008,
respectively. Through December 31, 2005, the Company did not recognize
compensation expense under APB 25 as the options had a zero intrinsic value at
the date of grant. The adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 resulted in a
compensation charge of $89,346 for the year ended December 31, 2006. On November
13, 2006, the Director filed his resignation. His options were vested
unexercised in February 2007.
(b) Other
Options
On
October 13, 2003, the Company granted two Directors 100,000 options each, at an
exercise price (equal to the market price on that day) of $4.21 per share, with
25,000 options vesting on each April 13, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. There were
100,000 options outstanding as of December 31, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 123R
on January 1, 2006 resulted in a compensation charge of $6,599 and $31,824
during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As of
December 31, 2009, there were 330,000 options outstanding with a weighted
average exercise price of $3.77.
No
options were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009 and the year
ended December 31, 2008.
The
following table summarizes information about shares subject to outstanding
options as of December 31, 2009, which was issued to current or former
employees, consultants or directors pursuant to the 2004 Incentive Plan and
grants to Directors:
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
Range
of
Exercise Prices
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Life in Years
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
100,000
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
30,000
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
$
|
4.78
|
|
200,000
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
|
3.31
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
$
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
$
|
3.40-$4.78
|
|
$
|
3.77
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
$
|
3.84
|
|
(c)
Warrants
On June
7, 2005, the Company granted 100,000 warrants to a consulting company as
compensation for investor relations services at exercise prices as follows:
40,000 warrants at $3.50 per share, 20,000 warrants at $4.25 per share, 20,000
warrants at $4.75 per share and 20,000 warrants at $5 per share. The warrants
have a term of five years and increments vest proportionately at a rate of a
total 8,333 warrants per month over a one year period. The warrants are being
expensed over the performance period of one year. In February 2006, the Company
terminated its contract with the consultant company providing investor relation
services. The warrants granted under the contract were reduced
time-proportionally to 83,330, based on the time in service by the consultant
company.
As part
of some Private Placement Memorandums the Company issued warrants that can be
summarized in the following table:
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
Terms
|
|
No.
of Warrants
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
Party
1
|
|
3/30/2008
|
|
2
years from Issuing
|
|
200,000
|
|
$1.50
|
Party
1
|
|
3/30/2008
|
|
2
years from Issuing
|
|
200,000
|
|
$2.00
|
Party
2
|
|
6/05/2008
|
|
2
years from Issuing
|
|
300,000
|
|
$1.50
|
Party
3
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
2
years from Issuing
|
|
200,000
|
|
$1,50
|
Party
4
|
|
9/5/2008
|
|
2
years from Issuing
|
|
200,000
|
|
$1.50
|
Cashless
Warrants:
On
September 5, 2008 the Company entered a short term loan memorandum, with Mehmet
Haluk Undes a third party, for a short term loan (“bridge”) of up to $275,000 to
bridge the drilling program of the Company. As a consideration for said
facility, the Company grants the investor with 100% cashless warrants coverage
for two years at exercise price of 1.50 per share. The investor made a loan of
$220,000 to the company on September 15, 2008 (where said funds were wired to
the company drilling contractor), that was paid in full on October 8, 2008.
Accordingly the investor is entitled to 200,000 cashless warrants as from
September 15, 2008 at exercise price of $1.50 for a period of 2 years. The
Company contests the validity of said warrants.
(d)
Shares
On May 6,
2008 the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value per
share, to Stephen Martin Durante in accordance with the instructions provided by
the Company pursuant to the 2004 Employee Stock Incentive Plan registered on
Form S-8 Registration
On June
11, 2008, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Mehmet Haluk Undes
(the “Undes Services Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company engaged Mr. Undes
for purposes of assisting the Company in identifying, evaluating and structuring
mergers, consolidations, acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances in
Southeast Europe, Middle East and the Turkic Republics of Central Asia. Pursuant
to the Undes Services Agreement, Mr. Undes has agreed to provide us services
related to the identification, evaluation, structuring, negotiating and closing
of business acquisitions, identification of strategic partners as well as the
provision of legal services. The term of the agreement is for five years and the
Company has agreed to issue Mr. Undes 525,000 shares of common stock that shall
be registered on a Form S8 no later than July 1, 2008.
On August
13, 2008, the Company issued 16,032 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value
per share, to Robin Ann Gorelick, the Company Secretary, in accordance with the
instructions provided by the Company pursuant to the 2004 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8 Registration
Following
the above securities issuance, the 2004 Plan was closed, and no more securities
can be issued under this plan.
2008
Stock Incentive Plan:
On July
28, 2008 - the Company held a special meeting of the shareholders for four
initiatives, consisting of approval of a new board of directors, approval of the
conversion of preferred shares to common shares, an increase in the authorized
shares and a stock incentive plan. All initiatives were approved by the majority
of shareholders. The 2008 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the “2008
Incentive Plan”) authorized the board to issue up to 50,000 shares of Common
Stock under the plan.
On August
23 the Company issued 1,000 shares of its common stock 0.001 par value per
share, to Robert M. Yaspan, the Company lawyer, in accordance with the
instructions provided by the Company pursuant to the 2008 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8 Registration.
On
November 4, 2008, the Company issued 2,540 shares of its common stock 0.001 par
value per share, to one consultant (2,000 shares) and two employees (540
shares), in accordance with the instructions provided by the Company pursuant to
the 2008 Employee Stock Incentive Plan registered on Form S-8
Registration.
On July
23, 2009 - , the Company issued 46,460 shares of its common stock 0.001 par
value per share, to Stephen M. Fleming, the Company’s securities counsel
pursuant to the 2008 Employee Stock Incentive Plan.
Following
the above securities issuance, the 2008 Plan was closed, and no more securities
can be issued under this plan.
Item
12.
|
Security Ownership Of Certain
Beneficial Owners And Management and Related Stockholder
Matters.
|
The
following table sets forth certain information relating to the ownership of our
voting securities by (i) each person known by us be the beneficial owner of more
than five percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (ii) each of
our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers, and (iv) all of our
executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the
information relates to these persons, beneficial ownership as of April 15, 2010.
Except as may be indicated in the footnotes to the table and subject to
applicable community property laws, each person has the sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares owned.
Title
of Class
|
Name of Beneficial Owner (1)
|
|
Amount
of Class
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Percentage of
Class
|
|
Common
|
Yossi
Attia (2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Common
|
Robin
Ann Gorelick **
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Common
|
Stewart
Reich (3) (4)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Common
|
Mace
K. Miller **
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Common
|
Gerald
Schaffer (3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
Yasheng
Group (6)
|
|
|
50,000,000
|
|
|
|
27.8%
|
|
Common
|
Capitol
Properties LLC (7)
|
|
|
38,461,538
|
|
|
|
21.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
executive officers and directors as a group (consisting of 6
individuals)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
less
than 1.00%
|
|
|
**
|
Resigned at
the date of this table.
|
(1)
Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole investment and voting power
with respect to the shares indicated. For purposes of this table, a person or
group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares which
such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after April 15, 2010. For
purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares held by each person
or group of persons named above on April 15, 2010, any security which such
person or group of persons has the right to acquire within 60 days after such
date is deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership for such person or persons, but is not deemed to be outstanding for
the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other
person.
(2) An
officer of the Company.
(3) A
director of the Company.
(4)
Includes an option to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of $3.40 per share.
(5)
Intentionally left blank.
(6)
Yasheng Group is a publicly traded company listed on the pink
sheets. As a result, its board of directors of Yasheng has voting and
dispositive control over the securities held by it. On April 5, 2010
the Company issued a formal request to Yasheng demanding that they surrender of
the 50,000,000 shares that were issued to them, as well as reimburse the Company
for its expenses associated with the transaction in the amount of
$348,240.
(7)
Haggai Ravid has voting and dispositive control over the securities held by
Capitol.
The
foregoing table is based upon 179,709,795 shares of common stock
outstanding as of April 15, 2010.
Item
13.
|
Certain Relationships And
Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
Mr.
Darren Dunckel, a former member of the Board, serves as CEO and President of ERC
as well as Verge, which are both Nevada corporations and former subsidiaries of
the Company. As President, he oversees management of real estate acquisitions,
development and sales in the United States and in Croatia where ERC holds
properties. Concurrently, Mr. Dunckel is the Managing Director of The
International Holdings Group Ltd. ("TIHG"), the sole shareholder of ERC and as
such manages the investment portfolio of this holding company. Mr. Dunckel has
entered into various transactions and agreements with the Company on behalf of
ERC, Verge and TIHG (all of which are related entities given Mr. Dunckel’s
involvement as their CEO). On December 31, 2006, Mr. Dunckel executed the
Agreement and Plan of Exchange on behalf of TIHG which was issued shares in ERC
in consideration for the exchange of TIHG's interest in Verge. Pursuant to that
certain Stock Transfer and Assignment of Contract Rights Agreement dated as of
May 14, 2007, the Company transferred its shares in ERC in consideration for the
assignment of rights to that certain Investment and Option Agreement, and
amendments thereto, dated as of June 19, 2006 which gives rights to certain
interests and assets. Mr. Dunckel has represented and executed the foregoing
agreements on behalf of ERC, Verge and TIHG as well as executed agreements on
behalf of Verge to transfer 100% of Verge. Effective July 1, 2006, Verge entered
into a non written year employment agreement with Darren C Dunckel as the
President of Verge which commenced on July 11, 2006 and provides for annual
compensation in the amount of $120,000, the employment expense of which was
capitalized related to such agreement was $120,000 for each year ended December
31, 2008 and 2007. Verge loaned to Mr. Darren Dunckel, the sum of $93,822, of
which $90,000 was paid-off via Mr. Dunckel’s employment agreement, and the
balance of $3,822 is included in Prepaid and other current assets as of December
31, 2006. As of December 31, 2007, the balance for advances to Mr. Dunckel was
paid off. On October 2008 a group of investors associated with Mr. Dunckel
acquired Verge from AGL in a transaction to which the company is not a
party. Upon closing the acquisition of AGL Mr. Attia was appointed as
the CEO of AGL. Mr. Yossi Attia serves as chairmen of the board of
AGL.
The board
of directors of AGL approved an employment agreement between the Company and Mr.
Shalom Attia, the controlling shareholder and CEO of AP Holdings
Ltd. The agreement goes into effect on the date that the
aforementioned allotments are consummated and stipulates that Mr. Shalom Attia
will serve as the VP – European Operations of AGL in return for a salary that
costs the Company an amount of US$ 10 thousand a month. Mr. Attia is
also entitled to reimbursement of expenses in connection with the affairs of the
Company, in accordance with Company policy, as set from time to
time. In addition, Mr. Shalom Attia is entitled to an annual bonus of
2.5% of the net, pre-tax income of AGL in excess of NIS 8 million. The agreement
was ratified by the general shareholders meeting of AGL on 30 October
2007.
On March
31, 2008, the Company raised $200,000 from a private offering of its securities
pursuant to a Private Placement Memorandum (“PPM”). The private placement was
for Company common stock which shall be “restricted securities” and were sold at
$1.00 per share. The offering included 200,000 warrants to be exercised at $1.50
for two years (for 200,000 shares of the Company common stock), and an
additional 200,000 warrants to be exercised at $2.00 for four years (for 200,000
shares of the Company common stock). Said Warrants may be exercised to ordinary
common shares of the Company only if the Company issues subsequent to the date
of the PPM, 25 million or more shares of its common stock. The money raised from
the private placement of the Company’s shares will be used for working capital
and business operations of the Company. The PPM was done pursuant to Rule 506. A
Form D has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in compliance
with Rule 506 for each Private Placement. The investor is D’vora Greenwood
(Attia), the sister of Mr. Yossi Attia. Mr. Attia abstained from voting on this
matter in the board meeting which approved this PPM.
On
September 1, 2008 Star Equity Investment LLC a third party acquired from Mr.
Attia, a $1 million note due by the Company since January 1, 2008. Said note is
bearing 12% interest commencing October 1st, 2008 and can be converted
(including interest) into common shares of the Company at a fixed price of $0.75
per share. Star Equity Investment LLC noticed the Company that due to
the Company default on said note, it willing to enter negotiations to modify its
instrument. The parties agreed to settle by converting the note including
interest into 8.5 million common shares of the Company.
On
September 5, 2008 the Company entered a short term loan memorandum, with Mehmet
Haluk Undes, for a short term loan (“bridge”) of $220,000 to bridge the drilling
program of the Company. As a consideration for said facility, the Company grants
the investor with 100% cashless warrants coverage for two years at exercise
price of $1.50 per share. The investor made a loan of $220,000 to the company on
September 15, 2008 (where said funds were wired to the company drilling
contractor), that was paid in full on October 8, 2008. Accordingly the investor
is entitled to 200,000 cashless warrants from September 15, 2008 at exercise
price of $1.50 for a period of 2 years. The Company contest said
warrants entitlements to the investor, based on a cause.
On
December 5, 2008 the Company entered into and closed an
Agreement with T.A.S. Holdings Limited (“TAS”) (the “TAS Agreement”)
pursuant to which TAS agreed to cancel the debt payable by the Company to TAS in
the amount of approximately $1,065,000 and its 15,000,000 shares of common stock
it presently holds in consideration of the Company issuing TAS 1,000,000 shares
of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which such shares carry a stated value
equal to $1.20 per share (the “Series B Stock”).
The
Series B Stock is convertible, at any time at the option of the holder, into
common shares of the Company based on a conversion price of $0.0016 per share.
The Series B Stock shall have voting rights on an as converted basis multiplied
by 6.25. Holders of the Series B Stock are entitled to receive, when declared by
the Company’s board of directors, annual dividends of $0.06 per share of Series
B Stock paid semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 commencing June 30,
2009.
In the
event of any liquidation or winding up of the Company, the holders of Series B
Stock will be entitled to receive, in preference to holders of common stock, an
amount equal to the stated value plus interest of 15% per year.
The
Series B Stock restricts the ability of the holder to convert the Series B Stock
and receive shares of the Company’s common stock such that the number of shares
of the Company common stock held by TAS and its affiliates after such conversion
does not exceed 4.9% of the Company’s then issued and outstanding shares of
common stock.
The
Series B Stock was offered and sold to TAS in a private placement transaction
made in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2)
under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 promulgated there under. TAS is an
accredited investor as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933. The Company filed its Certificate of Designation of
Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Preferred Stock with the State
of Delaware
Based on
agreements that the company is not side too, Dr. Rubin was partial owner of
T.A.S. Dr. Rubin resigned from the Company Board of Directors on April 7, 2010
to pursue other opportunities.
Item
14.
|
Principal Accountants Fees And
Services
|
The
following table presents aggregate fees for professional audit services rendered
by Robison Hill and Company for the audits of the Company’s annual financial
statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and fees billed for other services rendered.
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Audit
Fees
|
|
$
|
24,960
|
|
|
$
|
41,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,960
|
|
|
$
|
41,800
|
|
The
Company’s Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible
non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. These services may
include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services.
All services rendered have been approved by the Audit Committee.
Item
15.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement
Schedules.
|
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
2.1
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to that certain Share Exchange Agreement by and
between Vortex Resources Corp. and Trafalgar Capital
Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg dated April 29
2008 (15)
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Agreement
and Plan of Exchange with Davy Crockett Gas Company, LLC and the members
of Davy Crockett Gas Company, LLC dated May 1, 2008
(16)
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Exchange with Davy Crockett Gas
Company, LLC and the members of Davy Crockett Gas Company, LLC dated June
11, 2008 (19)
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Shares
Purchase Agreement between Vitonas Investments Limited, a
Hungarian corporation, Certus Kft., a Hungarian corporation, Rumed
2000 Kft., a Hungarian corporation and Euroweb International Corp., a
Delaware corporation, dated as of February 23, 2004.
(33)
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Share
Purchase Agreement by and between Euroweb International Corp. and Invitel
Tavkozlesi Szolgaltato Rt. (34)
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Shares
Purchase Agreement between Vitonas Investments Limited, a Hungarian
corporation, Certus Kft., a Hungarian corporation, Rumed 2000 Kft., a
Hungarian corporation and Euroweb International Corp., a Delaware
corporation, dated as of February 23, 2004. (33)
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate
of Incorporation filed November 9, 1992 (1)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amendment
to Certificate of Incorporation filed July 9, 1997 (2)
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Bylaws(1)
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate
of Designation of Preferences, Rights, and Limitations of Series A
Preferred Stock (19)
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Certificate
of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B
Preferred Stock (26)
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation (33)
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated July 29,
2008 (22)
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Certificate
of Ownership of Emvelco Corp. and Vortex Resources
Corp.(23)
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation , dated February 24, 2009
(28)
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
Form
of Common Stock Certificate (1)
|
3.11
3.12
|
|
Certificate of Designations of
Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series D Preferred Stock dated
December 18, 2009. (36)
Certificate of Designation –
Series C (38)
|
4.1
|
|
Convertible
Note issued to Trafalgar Capital Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg,
dated September 2008 (24)
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form
of Convertible Note dated May 1, 2008 issued to the members of Davy
Crockett Gas Company, LLC (16)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
All
Inclusive Promissory Note, dated November 27, 2007, issued by 13059
Dickens LLC in the name of Kobi Louria (14)
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form
of Warrant to Purchase 200,000 Shares of Common Stock issued in the name
of Vortex One, LLC (20)
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Share
Purchase Agreement, dated February 2004, by and
between PANTEL TAVKOZLESI ES KOMMUNIKACIOS RT.
And Euroweb International Inc. (3)
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form
of Guaranty, dated February 23, 2004 by EuroWeb International, Inc. in
favor
of PANTEL TAVKOZLESI ES KOMMUNIKACIOS RT.
(3)
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement entered by and between Vortex Resources Corp. and
Trafalgar Capital Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg dated September
25, 2008 (24)
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Security
Agreement entered by and between Vortex Resources Corp. and Trafalgar
Capital Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg dated September 25, 2008
(24)
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Pledge
Agreement entered by and between Vortex Resources Corp. and Trafalgar
Capital Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg dated September 25, 2008
(24)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Investment
Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2006, by and between EWEB RE Corp. and AO
Bonanza Las Vegas, Inc. (4)
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Sale
and Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2007, by and between
Emvelco Corp. and Marivaux Investments Limited (5)
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Stock
Transfer and Assignment of Contract Rights Agreement, dated as of May 14,
2007 among Emvelco Corp., Emvelco RE Corp., The International Holdings
Group Ltd., and Verge Living Corporation (6)
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Agreement,
dated as of June 5, 2007, among Emvelco Corp., Yossi Attia, Darren
Dunckel, and Upswing, Ltd.(7)
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Agreement,
dated July 5, 2007 by and between Emvelco Corp and Emvelco RE
Corp.(8)
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
All-Inclusive
Purchase Money Deeds of Trust with Assignment of Rents - Edinburgh Avenue,
dated July 5, 2007 by and between Emvelco Corp and Emvelco RE
Corp.(8)
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
All-Inclusive
Purchase Money Deeds of Trust with Assignment of Rents - Harper
Avenue, dated July 5, 2007 by and between Emvelco Corp and
Emvelco RE Corp. (8)
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
All-Inclusive
Purchase Money Deeds of Trust with Assignment of Rents - Laurel
Avenue, dated July 5, 2007 by and between Emvelco Corp and
Emvelco RE Corp. (8)
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Agreement,
dated as of June 5, 2007, among Emvelco Corp., Yossi Attia, Darren
Dunckel, and Upswing, Ltd.(9)
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Agreement,
dated July 2007, by and among Emvelco Corp., Appswing Ltd. and AP Holdings
Ltd. (10)
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Agreement,
dated July 19, 2007, by and among Emvelco Corp., Kidron Industrial
Holdings Ltd and AP Holdings Ltd. (10)
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Indemnification
Agreement, dated September 18, 2007 by and between Emvelco Corp. and Verge
Living Corporation (11)
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Notice
of Exercise of Options, dated October 15, 2007 from Emvelco Corp. to
Emvelco RE Corp. (12)
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Settlement
and Release Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to that certain Term Sheet by
and between Emvelco Corp and Dr. Danny Rittman, dated
November 15, 2007. (13)
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
All
Inclusive Deed of Trust, dated November 27, 2007 by and between 13059
Dickens LLC and Kobi Louria (14)
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Services
Agreement dated June 11, 2008 by and between EMVELCO Corp. and Mehmet
Haluk Undes (18)
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Limited
Liability Company Operating Agreement of Vortex Ocean One, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company, dated June 30, 2008 (20)
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Term
Assignment of Oil and Gas Lease issued to Davy Crockett Gas Company, LLC
(20)
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Drilling
Agreement, dated July 1, 2008, by and between Davy Crockett Gas Company,
LLC and Ozona Natural Gas Company, LLC (20)
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Mergers
and Acquisitions Consulting Agreement, dated July 1, 2008, by and between
the Company and TransGlobal Financial LLC (21)
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Agreement
dated December 3, 2008 and is made by and between Vortex Resource Corp.
and T.A.S. Holdings Limited (26)
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Form
of Agreement, dated December 19, 2009, by and between Vortex Resources
Corp. and the assignees of those persons party to that certain
Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 21, 2005 (27)
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Agreement
by and between Vortex Resources Corp. and Star Equity Investments, LLC,
dated March 11, 2009 (29)
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Form
of Subscription Agreement, dated January 23, 2009 related to the sale of
shares of the Company’s Common Stock
(30)
|
10.30
10.31
10.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
10.36
10.37
|
|
Employment
Agreement by and between the Company and Yossi Attia effective July 1,
2006 (31)
Pledge
Agreement by and between Vortex Ocean One LLC and Tiran Ibgui dated
November 18, 2008
Amendment
No, 1 Dated as of August 14, 2006 to the Employment Agreement between
Yossi Attia and Euroweb International Corp.
Employment
Agreement by and between Emvelco Corp. and Mike M. Mustafoglu
(35)
Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 30, 2009 between
Yasheng Eco-Trade Corporation and Socius Capital Group, LLC d/b/a Socius
Life Sciences Capital Group, LLC
Warrant dated December 30, 2009
issued by Yasheng Eco-trade Corporation to Socius CG II,
Ltd.
Exchange
Agreement dated December 30, 2009 between Yasheng Eco-trade Corporation
and Moran Atias
Exchange Agreement dated January
20, 2010 between Yasheng Eco-trade Corporation and Moran Atias
(37)
|
10.38
10.39
10.40
21.1
|
|
Convertible Note issued November
23, 2009 (38)
Stock Exchange Agreement between
Yasheng Eco-Trade Corporation and Yasheng Group (BVI) dated August 26,
2009 (39)
Agreement between Yasheng
Eco-Trade Corporation and Yasheng Group dated August 26, 2009
(40)
List
of Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vortex
Resources Corp. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vortex
Resources Corp. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
(1)
Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2
dated May 12, 1993 (Registration No. 33-62672-NY, as amended)
(2)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-QSB
for quarter ended June 30, 1998.
(3)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on February 27, 2004.
(4)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on March 9, 2004.
(5)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on December 21, 2005.
(6)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on May 16, 2007
(7)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on June 11, 2007
(8)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on July 12, 2007
(9)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on June 11, 2007
(10) Incorporated
by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form
8-K on July 26, 2007
(11)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on September 26, 2007
(12)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on October 19, 2007
(13)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on November 19, 2007
(14)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on December 21, 2007
(15) Incorporated
by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form
8-K on May 5, 2008
(16)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on May 7, 2008
(17)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on June 10, 2008
(18)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on June 13, 2008
(19
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on June 17, 2008
(20)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on July 9, 2008
(21)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on July 17, 2008
(22)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on August 1, 2008
(23)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on September 4, 2008
(24)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on October 2, 2008
(25)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on November 20, 2008
(26)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on December 5, 2008
(27)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on December 31, 2008
(28)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on February 25, 2009
(29)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on March 19, 2009
(30)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on January 28, 2009
(31)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on July 5, 2006
(32)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Schedule
14A Proxy Statement on May 7, 2003
(34)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on December 21, 2005
(35)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 19, 2008
(36)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on December 31, 2009
(37)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on January 22, 2010
(38)
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K on December 3, 2009
(39) Incorporated
by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form
8-K on January 9, 2009
(40) Incorporated
by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form
8-K on August 28, 2009
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
VORTEX
RESOURCES CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/
Yossi Attia
|
|
|
|
Yossi
Attia
|
|
Dated:
April 15, 2010
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended, this Report
has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
SIGNATURE
|
|
TITLE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
/s/ Yossi Attia
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Director
|
|
April
15, 2010
|
Yossi
Attia
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
/s/ Stewart Reich
|
|
Director
|
|
April
15, 2010
|
Stewart
Reich
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
/s/ Gerald Schaffer
|
|
Director
|
|
April
15, 2010
|
Gerald
Schaffer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
/s/ Allison Moses
|
|
Secretary
|
|
April
15, 2010
|
Allison
Moses
|
|
|
|
|
YASHENG
ECO-TRADE CORPORATION
(f/k/a
VORTEX RESOURCES CORP.)
Consolidated
Financial Statements
As of
December 31, 2009 and As of December 31, 2008 and for the Years Ended December
31, 2009 and 2008
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Report
of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
|
|
F-3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
|
|
F-4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
F-5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
F-6
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
F-7
|
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Yasheng
Eco-Trade Corporation and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets of Yasheng Eco-Trade Corporation (f/k/a Vortex
Resources Corp., and f/k/a Emvelco Corp.) and Subsidiaries as of December 31,
2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, stockholder’s equity and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor
were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion the consolidated
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Yasheng Eco-Trade Corporation and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going
concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the financing of
the Company’s projects is dependent on the future effect of the so called
sub-prime mortgage crisis on financial institutions. This sub-prime
crisis may affect the availability and terms of financing of the completion of
the projects as well as the availability and terms of financing may affect the
Company’s ability to obtain relevant financing, if required. The
sub-prime mortgage crisis has raised substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
|
/s/ Robison, Hill
&
Co.
Certified
Public Accountants
|
Salt Lake
City, Utah
April 15,
2010
YASHENG
ECO-TRADE CORPORATION
(f/k/a Vortex Resources
Corp.)
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
As
of December 31, 2009 and 2008
Amounts in US
dollars
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
85,789 |
|
|
|
123,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
assets from continued operations
|
|
|
85,789 |
|
|
|
123,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Current assets from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
1,544,690 |
|
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
1,630,479 |
|
|
|
2,223,903 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
1,390,451 |
|
|
|
813,064 |
|
Convertible notes payable to third
party – current portion
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
212,290 |
|
Other current
liabilities
|
|
|
151,742 |
|
|
|
89,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
1,542,193 |
|
|
|
1,114,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Notes Payable to Third
Parties
|
|
|
3,535,000 |
|
|
|
3,440,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Minority
interest in subsidiary’s net assets
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, series
C convertible, $.025 stated value,
210,087 shares authorized issued and
outstanding; in 2008,
1,000,000 series B
convertible, $1.20 stated value - Authorized and
outstanding
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value -
Authorized 400,000,000 shares; 140,909,795 and 872,809 shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
140,910 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
Additional paid-in
capital
|
|
|
92,624,105 |
|
|
|
85,467,283 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(96,189,694 |
) |
|
|
(89,497,091 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(2,226 |
) |
|
|
(2,226 |
) |
Treasury stock – 1,000 common
shares at cost
|
|
|
(24,809 |
) |
|
|
(24,809 |
) |
Total stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
(3,446,714 |
) |
|
|
(2,855,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
1,630,479 |
|
|
|
2,223,903 |
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
YASHENG
ECO-TRADE CORPORATION
(f/k/a Vortex Resources
Corp.)
Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Years
Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Amounts
in US dollars
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues from
Sales
|
|
$ |
--- |
|
|
$ |
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
revenues
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and related
costs
|
|
|
410,156 |
|
|
|
558,073 |
|
Consulting, professional and
directors fees
|
|
|
790,373 |
|
|
|
13.049,759 |
|
Other selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
203,670 |
|
|
|
413,576 |
|
Commitment fee and related legal
expenses
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Other
expenses
|
|
|
348,240 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
|
2,022,439 |
|
|
|
14,021,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(2,022,439 |
) |
|
|
(14,021,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
171,567 |
|
|
|
729,097 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(3,280,731 |
) |
|
|
(1,922,983 |
) |
Net interest income
(expense)
|
|
|
(3,109,164 |
) |
|
|
(1,193,886 |
) |
Other
income
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Financing loss - change in
conversion price
|
|
|
(1,786,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income
taxes
|
|
|
(6,852,603 |
) |
|
|
(15,215,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
expense
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing
operations
|
|
|
(6,852,603 |
) |
|
|
(15,215,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
& Goodwill impairment, net of tax
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(35,935,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss before minority interest
in loss of consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
(6,852,603 |
) |
|
|
(51,150,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less minority interest in loss of
consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
(56,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(6,692,603 |
) |
|
|
(51,207,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
(loss)
|
|
$ |
(6,692,603 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,207,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing
operations, basic
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(78.04 |
) |
Loss per share from discontinued
operations, basic
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(184.32 |
) |
Net Loss per share,
basic
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(262.36 |
) |
Loss per share from continuing
operations, diluted
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(76.01 |
) |
Loss per share from discontinued
operations, diluted
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(179.52 |
) |
Net Loss per share,
diluted
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(255.53 |
) |
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding, basic
|
|
|
88,985,544 |
|
|
|
194,967 |
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding, diluted
|
|
|
88,985,544 |
|
|
|
200,175 |
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
YASHENG
ECO-TRADE CORPORATION
(f/k/a
VORTEX RESOURCES CORP.)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 and 2008
Amounts
in US dollars
|
Preferred
Stock
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Number
|
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Income
|
Treasury
|
Shareholders'
|
|
of
Shares
|
Amount
|
of
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
(Loss)
|
Stock
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
46,092
|
46
|
53,285,959
|
(38,289,630)
|
(2,226)
|
(2,117,711)
|
12,876,438
|
Compensation
charge on shares, options and warrants issued to
consultants
|
|
|
2,540
|
3
|
2,018,412
|
|
|
|
2,018,415
|
Treasury
stock - Open Market
|
|
|
(1,030)
|
(1)
|
(102)
|
|
|
(28,400)
|
(28,503)
|
Issuance
of preferred shares and subsequent conversion into common
shares
|
|
|
500,000
|
500
|
49,999,500
|
|
|
|
50,000,000
|
Issuance
of shares - common
|
|
|
25,207
|
25
|
1,017,489
|
|
|
|
1,017,514
|
Conversion
of notes payable into common shares
|
|
|
450,000
|
450
|
2,149,550
|
|
|
|
2,150,000
|
Cancellation
of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
(2,121,302)
|
|
|
2,121,302
|
-
|
Discount
on Note Payable
|
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
Surrendered
15M shares
|
|
|
(150,000)
|
(150)
|
(14,999,850)
|
|
|
|
(15,000,000)
|
Conversion
of note to Series B preferred
|
1,000,000
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
(132,417)
|
|
|
|
1,067,583
|
Net
loss for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,207,461)
|
|
|
(51,207,461)
|
Related
party-bad debt writeoff
|
|
|
|
|
(5,959,956)
|
|
|
|
(5,959,956)
|
Balances
as of December 31, 2008
|
1,000,000
|
1,200,000
|
872,809
|
873
|
85,467,283
|
(89,497,091)
|
(2,226)
|
(24,809)
|
(2,855,970)
|
Conversion
of note to common shares
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
8,500
|
1,048,833
|
|
|
|
1,057,333
|
Change
in conversion price
|
|
|
|
|
1,786,000
|
|
|
|
1,786,000
|
Shares
issued to Yasheng
|
|
|
50,000,000
|
50,000
|
146,830
|
|
|
|
196,830
|
Shares
issued to Capitol
|
|
|
38,461,538
|
38,462
|
112,948
|
|
|
|
151,410
|
Conversion
of preferred Series B stock
|
-1000000
|
-1200000
|
7,500,000
|
7,500
|
1,192,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
Issuance
of Series C Preferred Stock
|
210087
|
5000
|
|
|
(55)
|
|
|
|
4,945
|
Discount
on conversion of debt
|
|
|
|
|
1,278,821
|
|
|
|
1,278,821
|
Star
note payable conversion
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
8,000
|
342,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
Moran
note payable conversion
|
|
|
11,903,333
|
11,903
|
88,097
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
Common
stock issuance: Raccah
|
|
|
1,075,655
|
1,076
|
376,144
|
|
|
|
377,220
|
Common
stock issuance: Yaniv
|
|
|
50,000
|
50
|
74,950
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
Common
stock issuance for servies: Fleming law firm
|
|
|
46,460
|
46
|
22,254
|
|
|
|
22,300
|
Common
stock issuance for servies: Public Relations firm
|
|
|
500,000
|
500
|
51,500
|
|
|
|
52,000
|
Common
stock for Rusk
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
4,000
|
396,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
Common
stock for Socius
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
10,000
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
Net
loss for period
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,692,603)
|
|
|
(6,692,603)
|
Balance
December 31, 2009
|
210,087
|
5,000
|
140,909,795
|
140,910
|
92,624,105
|
-96,189,694
|
-2,226
|
-24,809
|
-3,446,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
YASHENG
ECO-TRADE CORPORATION
(f/k/a Vortex Resources
Corp.)
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Amounts
in US dollars
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(6,692,603 |
) |
|
|
(51,207,461 |
) |
Decrease (Increase) in
accounts receivable
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
218,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss in consolidated
subsidiary
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
56,531 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in
accounts payable
|
|
|
577,387 |
|
|
|
813,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
loss
|
|
|
1,786,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Amortization of debt
discount
|
|
|
2,595,600 |
|
|
|
222,509 |
|
Bad debt
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
Consulting
fees
|
|
|
724,300 |
|
|
|
13,049,759 |
|
Decrease in other
current liabilities
|
|
|
(62,342 |
) |
|
|
(216,120 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used
by) continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,276,658 |
) |
|
|
(37,063,300 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used
by) discontinued operations
|
|
|
221,379 |
|
|
|
36,832,317 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(690,279 |
) |
|
|
(230,983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash proceeds received from sale
of stock for minority interest
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
525,000 |
|
Cash proceeds received from former
DCG members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Loan advances to Emvelco RE
Corp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294,361 |
) |
Loan advances to Verge Loan
advances to Verge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241,837 |
) |
Repayments from Verge,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,300 |
|
Net cash used in
investing activities
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
(327,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments to acquire treasury
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-28,503 |
|
Proceeds from notes
payable
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
4,009,900 |
|
Payment on notes
payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(591,565 |
) |
Proceeds from secured bank
loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,993 |
|
Repayments of bank
loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,249,590 |
) |
Proceeds from related
party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482,205 |
|
Repayment to related
party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000,000 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of
stock
|
|
|
457,165 |
|
|
|
1,017,768 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
627,165 |
|
|
|
(341,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(38,114 |
) |
|
|
(245,673 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of year
|
|
|
123,903 |
|
|
|
369,576 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
year
|
|
|
85,789 |
|
|
|
123,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|