Notice and Proxy
Table of Contents

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

 

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Filed by the Registrant    x

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    ¨

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

x    Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

¨    Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

¨    Definitive Proxy Statement

   
¨    Definitive Additional Materials    
¨    Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12    

 

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust


(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x    No fee required.

 

¨    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

  1.   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  2.   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  3.   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  4.   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  5.   Total fee paid:

 

¨    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

 

  ¨   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

 

  1.   Amount previously paid:

 

  2.   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  3.   Filing Party:

 

  4.   Date Filed:


Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

6110 Executive Boulevard, Suite 800

Rockville, Maryland 20852

Telephone 301-984-9400

Facsimile 301-984-9610

Website www.writ.com

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

March 28, 2006

Dear Shareholder,

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust to be held on Friday, May 26, 2006. The formal Notice of the meeting and a Proxy Statement describing the proposals to be voted upon are enclosed.

Two Trustees are nominated for election at the meeting, and the Board of Trustees recommends that shareholders vote in favor of their election. In addition, the Board of Trustees has one proposal to amend WRIT’s Declaration of Trust to increase the maximum number of Trustees that may be elected to the Board to 11 Trustees. The Board of Trustees recommends that shareholders vote for the proposal.

Please read the Proxy Statement, then complete, sign and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope. You may also vote via telephone or the Internet. Just follow the instructions on the enclosed card.

Regardless of the number of shares you own, your vote is important.

 

Best Regards,

/s/ Edmund B. Cronin, Jr.

Edmund B. Cronin, Jr.

Chairman of the Board


Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

March 28, 2006

Dear Shareholder,

The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (the “Trust” or “WRIT”) will be held at the Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, Maryland (Northwest corner of Rockville Pike and Marinelli Rd., across the street from the White Flint Metro Stop) on Friday, May 26, 2006 at 11:00 a.m., for the following purposes:

 

  1. To elect two Trustees;

 

  2. Approval of an amendment to the Declaration of Trust increasing the maximum number of Trustees that may be elected to the Board to eleven Trustees;

 

  3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

The Trustees have fixed the close of business on March 16, 2006 as the record date for shares entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

The Annual Report of the Trust, Proxy Statement and a Proxy Card are enclosed with this Notice.

You are requested, whether or not you plan to be present at the Annual Meeting, to sign and promptly return the Proxy Card in the enclosed business reply envelope. Alternatively, you may vote by telephone or the Internet, if you prefer. To do so, you should follow the instructions on the enclosed Proxy Card.

 

Sincerely,

/s/ Laura M. Franklin

Laura M. Franklin

Corporate Secretary


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     Page

Proxy Statement

   1

The Board of Trustees and Management

  

The Board of Trustees

   1

The Management

   3

Ownership of Shares by Trustees and Executive Officers

   5

Ownership of Shares by Certain Beneficial Owners

   5

Executive Compensation

  

Summary Compensation Table

   6

Aggregated Option Exercises and Option Value Table

   7

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

   7

Report on Executive Compensation

  

Executive Compensation Program

   7

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

   8

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

   8

Section 162(m)

   9

Performance Graph

   9

Audit Committee Report

   10

Principal Accounting Firm Fees

   10

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

   11

Proposal 1:   Election of Trustees

   12

Proposal 2:   Approve an amendment to the Declaration of Trust increasing the maximum number of Trustees that may be elected to the Board to eleven Trustees

   12

Other Matters

  

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   13

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   13

Annual Report

   14

Code of Ethics

   14

Corporate Governance Guidelines

   14

Solicitation of Proxies

   14

2007 Annual Meeting

   14

APPENDIX A: Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee Charter

   A-1

APPENDIX B: Compensation Committee Charter

   B-1

APPENDIX C: Audit Committee Charter

   C-1


Table of Contents

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

6110 Executive Boulevard, Suite 800

Rockville, Maryland 20852

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement is furnished by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) in connection with its solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 26, 2006 and at any and all adjournments thereof. Mailing of this Proxy Statement, the form of Proxy and the Annual Report of the Trust will commence on or about April 8, 2006 to shareholders of record as of March 16, 2006. All proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained therein, and if no instructions are specified, the proxies will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. Therefore, if no instructions are specified, the proxies will be voted FOR the election of the two Trustee nominees listed and FOR the amendment to the Declaration of Trust to increase the maximum number of Trustees that may be elected to the board to eleven Trustees. Abstentions and broker non-votes (proxies that indicate that brokers or nominees have not received instructions from the beneficial owner of shares) are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions are counted in tabulating the total number of votes cast on proposals presented to shareholders, whereas broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of determining the total number of votes cast. A Proxy on the enclosed form may be revoked by the shareholder at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting by submitting, to the Corporate Secretary of the Trust, a duly executed Proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and orally withdrawing the Proxy.

The voting securities of the Trust consist of shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value (“Shares”), of which 42,182,801 Shares were issued and outstanding at the close of business on March 16, 2006. The Trust has no other class of voting security. Each Share outstanding on March 16, 2006 will be entitled to one vote. Shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights.

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND MANAGEMENT

The Board of Trustees

The Board consists of seven Trustees divided into two classes of two Trustees each and one class of three Trustees. The terms of the Trustees continue until the Annual Meetings to be held in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively, and until their respective successors are elected. At each Annual Meeting, two or three Trustees are elected, subject to the limitations described below, for a term of three years to succeed those Trustees whose terms expire at such Annual Meeting. The Trust’s Bylaws provide that no person shall be nominated for election as a Trustee after their 72nd birthday.

The Board held nine meetings in 2005. During 2005, each incumbent Trustee attended at least 75% of the total number of Board and committee meetings he or she was eligible to attend. The Trust’s non-management Trustees meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management, presided over by Mr. McDaniel, the chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee.

The Board has determined that all Trustees with the exception of Mr. Cronin are “independent” as that term is defined in the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Board has determined that Mr. Osnos is an independent Board member as that term is defined in the New York Stock Exchange rules but is not eligible to serve on the audit committee because of the rule that requires that an audit committee member not directly or indirectly receive any compensation from the Trust other than fees for serving as a Trustee. In making this determination, the Board concluded that, although Mr. Osnos is an employee of the Trust’s outside counsel, because the Trust’s payments to such counsel are not material to the firm or the Trust, the relationship does not constitute a material relationship with the Trust.

The Board provides a process for shareholders to send communications to the entire Board, or any of the Trustees. Shareholders may send these written communications c/o Corporate Secretary, Washington Real Estate Investment Trust, 6110 Executive Boulevard, Suite 800, Rockville, Maryland 20852. All communications will be compiled by the Corporate Secretary and submitted to the Board or the Trustees on a periodic basis.

All members of the Board attended the Annual Shareholders Meeting in 2005. The Board does not have a formal written policy requiring Trustees to attend the Annual Shareholders Meeting, although Trustees have traditionally attended.

The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee held one meeting in 2005. The Committee members are Chairman McDaniel, Messrs. Derrick, Osnos and Nason. All members of the Committee are “independent” as that term is defined in the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Committee performs the duties described in the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee Charter, adopted by the Board, a copy of which, as revised on September 13, 2005, is included as Appendix A. Among other things, the Committee develops and recommends corporate governance principles,

 

1


Table of Contents

evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in light of Trust goals and objectives, and recommends nominees for election to the Board of Trustees as outlined in the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee Charter. The Committee will consider nominees to the Board submitted by shareholders in writing addressed to the attention of the Committee at the executive offices of the Trust in Rockville, Maryland. The Committee’s minimum qualifications and specific qualities and skills required for Trustees are set forth in item number 6 of Appendix A on page A-2. In addition to considering candidates suggested by shareholders, the Committee considers potential candidates recommended by current Trustees, Trust Officers, employees and others. The Committee screens all potential candidates in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation. The Committee’s review is typically based on any written materials provided with respect to the potential candidate. The Committee determines whether the candidate meets the Trust’s minimum qualifications and specific qualities and skills for Trustees and whether requesting additional information or an interview is appropriate.

The Compensation Committee met six times in 2005. Committee members are Chairman Nason, Messrs. Osnos and Pivik and Ms. Williams. All members of the Committee are “independent” as that term is defined in the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board with respect to executive compensation decisions. See the “Report on Executive Compensation” on page 7 of this Proxy Statement. A copy of the Compensation Committee Charter, adopted by the Board, as revised on September 13, 2005, is included in Appendix B.

The Audit Committee met eight times in 2005. The Committee members are Chairman Derrick, Messrs. McDaniel and Pivik and Ms. Williams. All members of the Committee are “independent” as that term is defined in the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Board has determined that Mr. Pivik qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert, as that term is defined in the rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee assists the Board in discharging its responsibility of oversight, but the existence of the Committee does not alter the responsibilities of the Trust’s management and the independent accountant with respect to the accounting and control functions and financial statement presentation. For a more detailed description of the Audit Committee’s duties and responsibilities see the “Audit Committee Report” on page 10 of this Proxy Statement. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter adopted by the Board, as revised on November 29, 2004, is included in Appendix C.

For 2005, the six non-officer Trustees of the Trust received an annual retainer of $25,000 plus $1,000 per committee meeting. In addition, each non-officer Trustee received an annual grant of $30,000 in restricted Shares which vested immediately. Committee Chairs received additional retainers as follows: Audit Committee $7,500; Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee, $3,000; and Compensation Committee, $3,000. Audit Committee members were also paid an additional retainer of $3,000. The Trust has approved a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the Trustees. The plan will allow any Trustee to defer a percentage of his or her cash compensation. Compensation deferred will be credited with interest. Upon the expiration of a Trustee’s term, the compensation plus interest can be paid in either a lump sum or in installments at the discretion of the Trustee. Upon death, the Trustee’s beneficiary will receive a lump sum pay out. The plan is unfunded and payments are to be made from general assets of the Trust.

During 2005, the Trust utilized the legal services of the law firm of Arent Fox PLLC, of which Trustee David M. Osnos is of-counsel. The amount of fees paid to Arent Fox did not exceed 5% of that firm’s 2005 gross revenues.

The following table sets forth the names and biographical information concerning each of the current Trustees.

 

NAME

  

PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION

   SERVED AS
TRUSTEE SINCE
   AGE    TERM
EXPIRES

John M. Derrick, Jr.

   Retired Chairman, CEO and President, Pepco Holdings, Inc.    1997    66    2006

Charles T. Nason

   Retired Chairman, President and CEO, The Acacia Group    2000    59    2006

Edmund B. Cronin, Jr.

   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, WRIT    1994    68    2007

John P. McDaniel

   Chief Executive Officer, MedStar Health    1998    63    2007

David M. Osnos

   Attorney, Arent Fox PLLC    1987    74    2007

Robert W. Pivik

   Retired Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP    2005    68    2008

Susan J. Williams

   Chief Executive Officer and President, Williams Aron & Associates    1999    65    2008

Mr. Edmund B. Cronin, Jr. is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Trust. Prior to joining the Trust in 1994 Mr. Cronin was President and CEO of H.G. Smithy Company and its subsidiaries from 1976 to 1994, providing a full range of corporate and institutional real estate services. Mr. Cronin is also a Director of Pepco Holdings, Inc. (formerly Potomac Electric Power Company (“PEPCO”), John J. Kirlin Companies (mechanical contractors), Federal City Council, Economic Club of Washington and Chairman of the Board of Georgetown University Hospital.

Mr. John M. Derrick Jr. is retired Chairman, CEO and President of Pepco Holdings, Inc. He joined PEPCO, its predecessor, in 1961 and served as President and CEO from 1997 until 1999 and as Chairman and CEO from 1999 until July 2003, and Chairman until May 2004. In August 2002, PEPCO became Pepco Holdings, Inc. From 1992 until 1997, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Derrick is a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, the National Society of Professional Engineers and the Washington Society of Engineers. He is past Chairman of the United States Energy Association and he has served as a Director of the United States Chamber of Commerce, a trustee of the Federal City Council and Chairman of the Greater Washington Initiative. He is past Chairman of the Maryland Chamber of Commerce and the Greater Washington Board of Trade.

Mr. Charles T. Nason is retired Chairman and CEO of The Acacia Group, including Acacia Life, Acacia Federal Savings Bank and the Calvert Group LTD. He served Acacia from 1977 to 2005, including being CEO from 1988 to 2003. The Acacia Group is a Washington D.C. based financial services organization with assets under management in excess of $13 billion. Mr. Nason is a past director of The Greater Washington Board of Trade and The Federal City Council. He currently serves as a Director of MedStar, Inc. and is a member of The Economic Club of Washington. He is also Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Washington and Jefferson College. In addition, he is past Chairman of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, a past Director of The American Council of Life Insurance and past Chairman of Insurance Marketplace Standards Association.

 

2


Table of Contents

Mr. John P. McDaniel is CEO of MedStar Health, a multi-institutional, not-for-profit healthcare organization serving Washington D.C., Maryland, Virginia and the mid-Atlantic region, since its inception in 1982. Mr. McDaniel serves on the Board of Thrivent Financial for Lutherans and is a Trustee of Georgetown University. Mr. McDaniel is a past Chairman and member of the Board of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, a member of the Executive Committee of the Federal City Council, Chairman and member of the Maryland State Racing Commission, and a member of the Executive Committee of the Greater Baltimore Committee. Mr. McDaniel is a Fellow of the American College of Healthcare Executives, a member of the Economic Club of Washington and a member of The Mary and Daniel Loughran Foundation.

Mr. David M. Osnos is of-counsel with Arent Fox PLLC (legal counsel to the Trust) and has been an attorney with the firm since 1956. His principal areas of practice include real estate, tax, securities, corporate, estate planning and sports law. He is a Director or Trustee of numerous organizations including EastGroup Properties (real estate investment trust), VSE Corporation (engineering) and Washington Wizards Basketball Club.

Mr. Robert W. Pivik, most recently Chief Operating Officer of Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP, served 35 years with the public accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP. While at Deloitte & Touche, Mr. Pivik held several senior management positions, including Chief Financial Officer and Managing Partner, Mid-Atlantic Region. Mr. Pivik previously served as Director and Audit Committee Chairman of On-Site Sourcing, Inc. and as Executive Board Member of the Boy Scouts of America - National Capital Area Council. He has also chaired the Marketing Committee for the Greater Washington Board of Trade. His community activities have included membership in Federal City Council and the Economic Club of Washington.

Ms. Susan J. Williams is CEO of Williams Aron & Associates, a public affairs consulting firm, since 2002. Ms. Williams was Founding Partner and served as President of Bracy Williams & Company, government affairs and public relations consultants from 1982 to 2001. Ms. Williams’ career includes public service as a legislative professional on Capitol Hill as well as Assistant Secretary of Transportation. She also played a founding role in Project Head Start. Ms. Williams is a past Chair of The Greater Washington Board of Trade. She served on the Board of Directors of the Henry L. Stimson Center, the American Institute for Public Service, the Historical Society of Washington, D.C., the National Aquarium in Baltimore, and the D.C. Agenda Project. She is currently a member of the Economic Club of Washington and the Federal City Council.

 

The Management

The following table contains information regarding the Executive Officers and other Officers of the Trust other than the Trust’s Chairman, President and CEO, Mr. Cronin. These Officers are elected annually by the Board and serve at the Board’s discretion.

 

NAME

     AGE     

POSITION

Executive Officers

         

George F. McKenzie

     50      Executive Vice President, Real Estate

Christopher P. Mundy

     44      Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer

Laura M. Franklin

     45      Senior Vice President, Accounting, Administration and Corporate Secretary

Sara L. Grootwassink

     38      Chief Financial Officer

Officers

         

James B. Cederdahl

     47      Managing Director, Property Management

David A. DiNardo

     43      Managing Director, Leasing

Thomas L. Regnell

     48      Managing Director, Acquisitions

 

3


Table of Contents

Mr. George F. McKenzie joined the Trust in September 1996 and was elected Executive Vice President, Real Estate in 2002. From 1985 to 1996, Mr. McKenzie served with the Prudential Realty Group, a subsidiary of Prudential Insurance Company of America as Vice President, Investment & Sales. Prior assignments included real estate finance originations and asset management in the mid-Atlantic region.

Ms. Laura M. Franklin, CPA, joined the Trust in August 1993 as Assistant Vice President, Finance. In 1995 she was named Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Secretary to the Trust. In 2002, she was named Senior Vice President, Accounting, Administration and Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining WRIT she was employed by The Reznick Group, specializing in audit and tax services for real estate clients. Ms. Franklin is a member of the NAREIT Best Financial Practices Council and is a director of KEEN USA and KEEN Greater DC, a non-profit organization that provides recreational opportunities for children and young adults with mental and physical disabilities.

Ms. Sara L. Grootwassink, CPA, CFA, joined the Trust in December 2001 as Managing Director, Finance and Capital Markets. In 2002, Ms. Grootwassink was named Chief Financial Officer. From 1999 through 2001, Ms. Grootwassink served as Vice President, Finance and Investor Relations at Corporate Office Properties Trust and previously as an Equity Analyst at Johnston, Lemon & Co. Ms. Grootwassink is a Director of CapitalSource, Inc. (NYSE: CSE), a commercial finance firm and serves on the Strategic Planning Committee of Washington Hospital Center. Ms. Grootwassink serves on the editorial advisory board of Real Estate Portfolio magazine, is a member of the Economic Club of Washington, and formerly served on NAREIT’s Investor Advisory Council.

Mr. Christopher P. Mundy joined the Trust in October of 2005. Formerly Executive Vice President of Strategic Planning and Operations of Equity Office Properties from 2000 to 2004, Mr. Mundy had complete operational oversight and P&L accountability over Equity Office Properties’ Eastern United States region. During his tenure at Equity Office Properties, Mr. Mundy also supervised the national portfolio/asset management division and acquisition due diligence teams between 2000 and 2004. He also served on the company’s Executive Operating Group. He is the Chairman of the Board of Everybody Wins! USA, a national children’s literacy advocacy group and is on the Executive Committee of the University of Pennsylvania Wharton Real Estate Center.

Mr. James B. Cederdahl was promoted to Managing Director, Property Management in January 2006. He joined the Trust as Senior Property Manager in August 1994 and was promoted to Director in 1999. Between 1984 to 1994, he performed management and leasing operations for a portfolio consisting of both retail and office buildings at Gates, Hudson, & Associates.

Mr. David A. DiNardo joined the Trust in June 2005 as Managing Director, Leasing. From 1998 to 2005, Mr. DiNardo served as a Senior Vice President and member of the Executive Committee of Grubb & Ellis Company in their Office Services Group. From 1993 to 1998, prior to its acquisition by Grubb & Ellis, Mr. DiNardo was a Principal at Smithy Braedon Company, where he represented a large number of tenants and owners. Mr. DiNardo joined Smithy Braedon in November of 1983. Mr. DiNardo is a member of the Greater Washington Commercial Association of Realtors (GWCAR) and a former member of its Board of Directors.

Mr. Thomas L. Regnell joined the Trust in January 1995 as Vice President, Acquisitions. In 2001, Mr. Regnell was named Managing Director, Acquisitions. From 1992 through 1994, Mr. Regnell served as an Investment (Acquisitions) Officer with Federal Realty Investment Trust. Previously, Mr. Regnell was a Vice President with Spaulding & Slye Company, a real estate development, brokerage and management company.

There are no family relationships between any Trustee and/or Executive Officer. There are no related party transactions between any Trustees or members of management and WRIT.

 

4


Table of Contents

Ownership of Shares by Trustees and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information concerning all Shares beneficially owned as of March 16, 2006 by each Trustee, by each of the “Named Officers” (as defined in “Executive Compensation” below) and by all Trustees and Executive Officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the voting and investment powers for the Shares listed are held solely by the named holder and/or the holder’s spouse.

 

NAME

   SHARES OWNED (1)    PERCENTAGE
OF TOTAL
 

Edmund B. Cronin, Jr.

   384,078    0.91 %

John M. Derrick, Jr.

   22,410    0.05 %

Laura M. Franklin

   83,915    0.20 %

Sara L. Grootwassink

   36,040    0.09 %

John P. McDaniel

   22,127    0.05 %

George F. McKenzie

   164,906    0.39 %

Christopher P. Mundy

   11,182    0.03 %

Charles T. Nason

   20,626    0.05 %

David M. Osnos

   21,777    0.05 %

Robert W. Pivik

   2,977    0.01 %

Susan J. Williams

   16,877    0.04 %

All Trustees and Executive Officers as a group (11 persons)

   786,916    1.87 %

 

(1) Includes Shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Cronin, 211,503; Mr. Derrick, 8,000; Ms. Franklin, 41,471; Ms. Grootwassink, 13,815; Mr. McDaniel, 14,000; Mr. McKenzie, 93,309; Mr. Nason, 8,000; Mr. Osnos, 6,000; Ms. Williams, 12,000; and all Trustees and Executive Officers and Officers as a group, 408,098.

Ownership of Shares by Certain Beneficial Owners

The Trust, based upon a Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), believes that the following person currently beneficially owns more than five percent of the outstanding Shares.

 

NAME

   SHARES OWNED     PERCENTAGE
OF TOTAL
 

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

100 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, Maryland 21202

   3,353,300 (1)   7.90 %

 

(1) These securities are owned by various individual and institutional investors which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”) serves as investment adviser with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. For purposes of the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Price Associates is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such securities; however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities.

 

5


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The Summary Compensation Table shows the compensation paid or awarded during the past three years to the Trust’s CEO and each of the Trust’s four other Executive Officers for the period(s) indicated (the “Named Officers”).

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

           ANNUAL CASH
COMPENSATION
  

LONG-TERM

COMPENSATION

    
                    

RESTRICTED
SHARE

AWARDS (1)

  

ALL OTHER

COMPENSATION (2)

NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION

   YEAR     SALARY    BONUS      

Edmund B. Cronin, Jr.

Chairman, President and CEO

   2005
2004
2003
 
 
 
  $
$
$
500,000
500,000
466,745
   $
$
$
270,000
147,854
391,600
   $
$
$
—  
850,981
587,583
   $
$
$
20,865
19,430
18,580

George F. McKenzie,

Executive Vice President, Real Estate

   2005
2004
2003
 
 
 
  $
$
$
300,000
300,000
271,095
   $
$
$
140,400
88,712
227,450
   $
$
$
—  
468,769
280,638
   $
$
$
19,548
18,405
18,382

Laura M. Franklin,

Senior Vice President, Accounting,

Administration and Corporate Secretary

   2005
2004
2003
 
 
 
  $
$
$
237,000
237,000
206,700
   $
$
$
93,852
70,083
173,420
   $
$
$
—  
355,236
202,415
   $
$
$
6,914
6,740
6,573

Sara L. Grootwassink,

Chief Financial Officer

   2005
2004
2003
 
 
 
  $
$
$
237,000
211,000
180,200
   $
$
$
93,852
62,394
151,200
   $
$
$
—  
373,889
176,457
   $
$
$
8,059
6,391
5,627

Christopher P. Mundy,

Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer

* Joined the company 10/03/05

   2005  *   $ 91,314    $ —      $ 349,997    $ 1,481

 

(1) The aggregate holdings and market value of restricted Shares held as of December 31, 2005, by the individuals listed are: Mr. Cronin (51,013 Shares, $1,548,245); Mr. McKenzie (26,253 Shares, $796,779); Ms. Franklin (18,916 Shares, $574,101); Ms. Grootwassink (18,347 Shares, $556,831); and Mr. Mundy ( 11,182, $339,374). The “value” is calculated assuming all Shares are vested as of December 31, 2005, even though not all of the awards have vested. In most cases, Share grants vest 20% per year beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. Dividends on all restricted Shares, including restricted Shares that have not vested, are paid at the same rate and at the same time as paid to all shareholders.

 

(2) Represents the 2005 economic benefit from life insurance policies, 401(k) match and auto allowance for each Executive Officer as follows: $8,060, $6,300 and $6,505, respectively, for Mr. Cronin; $1,539, $6,300 and $11,709, respectively, for Mr. McKenzie; $614, $6,300 and $0, respectively, for Ms. Franklin; $259, $6,300 and $1,500, respectively, for Ms. Grootwassink; $0, $0 and $1,481, respectively, for Mr. Mundy.

 

6


Table of Contents

Aggregated Option Exercises and Option Value Table

The following table shows information concerning the exercise of options during 2005 by each of the Named Officers and the year-end value of unexercised options.

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 2005 AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

 

              

NUMBER OF

UNEXERCISED OPTIONS

AT DECEMBER 31, 2005

  

VALUE OF UNEXERCISED IN

THE MONEY OPTIONS AT

DECEMBER 31, 2005

NAME

   SHARES
ACQUIRED
ON EXERCISE
   VALUE
REALIZED
   EXERCISABLE    UNEXERCISABLE    EXERCISABLE    UNEXERCISABLE

Edmund B. Cronin, Jr.

   —      $ —      211,503    —      $ 1,461,774    $ —  

George F. McKenzie

   14,025    $ 209,056    113,309    —      $ 875,743    $ —  

Laura M. Franklin

   —      $ —      41,471    —      $ 265,666    $ —  

Sara L. Grootwassink

   —      $ —      14,815    —      $ 70,223    $ —  

Christopher P. Mundy

   —      $ —      —      —      $ —      $ —  

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Board determined executive compensation for 2005. The Compensation Committee, composed of Chairman Nason, Messrs. Osnos and Pivik and Ms. Williams, was responsible for making recommendations to the Board with respect to compensation decisions. There are no Compensation Committee interlocks and no Trust employee serves on the Compensation Committee.

REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2005 Executive Compensation Program

In November 2004, with the guidance of an independent consultant, the Board of Trustees approved an amended short-term and long-term incentive plan for Executive Officers, Officers and other members of management (the “Program”). The first cash benefits under the amended short-term plan were paid in late 2005, and the first Share grants under the amended long-term plan were made in early 2006.

The goals of the Program are the following:

 

    To allow WRIT to attract and retain talented officers and executives.

 

    To provide added incentives to achieve various objective performance targets.

 

    To link compensation to shareholder results by rewarding competitive and superior performance.

Under the Program the Compensation Committee recommended salaries for the Trust’s Executive Officers based upon (i) a review of the compensation paid to similarly situated executive officers employed by companies comprising the Morgan Stanley REIT Index; and (ii) a subjective evaluation of each Executive Officer’s performance throughout the year. Cash bonuses were determined through a comparison of WRIT’s 2005 FFO per share growth and EBITDA, compared to a target approved by the Board of Trustees in the preceding year.

The short-term incentive compensation plan provides for the annual payment of cash bonuses based upon WRIT’s achievement of its annual targets for funds from operations (FFO) per share and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Each target will be determined in November of the preceding year by management and approved by the Board of Trustees. These measures will be weighted 50% each, and actual results for these measures will be compared to target. The combined results may then be adjusted by a multiplier, depending upon the condition of objective measures of the market environment, in the event that WRIT significantly under-performs or outperforms its targets

 

7


Table of Contents

based on market factors unforeseen at the time the targets are set. The officers and executives will be paid cash awards equal to various percentages of their salaries based on the foregoing calculations and their positions, with minimum and maximum thresholds.

The long-term incentive plan was designed to link long-term compensation to shareholder results by rewarding competitive and superior performance. The awards are granted in the form of restricted Shares, with a value equal to various percentages of their salaries based upon WRIT’s performance compared to an appropriate benchmark/target, with minimum and maximum thresholds. The Shares are granted pursuant to WRIT’s existing Share grant plan, vest ratably over a five-year period from the date of grant and are not permitted to be sold until the entire award has vested. Officers no longer receive annual awards of Share options.

The Trust has adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the Officers and members of the Board of Trustees. The plan allows for a deferral of a percentage of annual cash compensation and Trustee fees. The plan is unfunded and payments are to be made out of the general assets of the Trust.

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

Mr. Cronin’s 2005 compensation consisted of his salary and bonus based upon the Program described above. Mr. Cronin’s salary was recommended by the Compensation Committee based upon (i) a review of the compensation paid to chief executive officers employed by companies comprising the Morgan Stanley REIT Index and (ii) a subjective evaluation of Mr. Cronin’s performance throughout the year. In general, the REIT Index comparison and the subjective evaluation were weighted equally by the Committee and the Board when making the decision to set Mr. Cronin’s salary at $500,000. As described above under the Program, Mr. Cronin’s 2005 bonus was determined through a comparison of WRIT’s 2005 FFO per share growth and EBITDA, compared to a target approved by the Board of Trustees in the preceding year.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

In November 2005, the Board of Trustees approved the establishment of a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for the benefit of the executive officers, other than the CEO, including the Chief Investment Officer appointed in October 2005, and other company officers. Under these plans, upon a participant’s termination of employment from the Trust for any reason other than death, discharge for cause or total and permanent disability, the participant will be entitled to receive an annual benefit equal to his or her accrued benefit times his or her vested interest. We account for these plans in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” whereby we accrue benefit cost in an amount that will result in an accrued balance at the end of each participant’s employment which is not less than the present value of the estimated benefit payments to be made. For the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we recognized current service cost of $565,000, $355,000 and $309,000, respectively.

The Trust established a SERP effective July 1, 2002 for the benefit of the CEO. Upon the CEO’s termination of employment from the Trust for any reason other than death, discharge for cause or total and permanent disability, the CEO will be entitled to receive an annual benefit equal to his accrued benefit times his vested interest. The CEO shall vest in accordance with the following schedule for each year of continuous employment with the Trust measured by reference to his birthday and commencing with the CEO’s sixty-fifth (65th) birthday:

 

Years of Continuous Employment

   Percentage Vested  

1

   0 %

2

   0 %

3

   50 %

4

   75 %

5

   100 %

The CEO shall be 100% vested upon his seventieth (70th) birthday, if having remained employed through that date. In addition, the CEO shall become 100% vested in the event of his termination of employment prior to his seventieth (70th) birthday due to the incurrence of a total and permanent disability (as defined in the Trust’s long-term disability plan). In addition, the Board of Trustees may, in its sole and absolute discretion, elect to accelerate the rate of vesting in whole or in part at any time.

 

8


Table of Contents

The Trust purchased a universal life insurance policy on the CEO’s life to serve as a source of funds to assist the Trust in meeting its liabilities under the SERP. Through an endorsement split dollar arrangement, the Trust has made available to the CEO pre-retirement life insurance coverage through age 70.

In the event the CEO continues in the employment of the Trust until age 70, the annual benefit to be paid to the CEO shall be $200,000. The SERP is not subject to the vesting, funding and fiduciary requirements under ERISA.

Section 162(m)

Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), a publicly held company such as the Trust will not be allowed a federal income tax deduction for compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer or one of the other four most highly compensated Officers (other than the CEO) to the extent that compensation (including certain stock-based compensation) paid to such Officer exceeds $1 million in any fiscal year, unless such compensation satisfies certain exceptions set forth in the Code. The Board intends to evaluate elements of compensation in light of Section 162(m), but may enter into arrangements that do not satisfy such exceptions to Section 162(m), as the Board determines to be appropriate.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Charles T. Nason, Compensation Committee Chairman

David M. Osnos, Compensation Committee Member

Robert W. Pivik, Compensation Committee Member

Susan J. Williams, Compensation Committee Member

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder return (assumes reinvestment of dividends) on the Shares with the cumulative total return of companies making up the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and The Morgan Stanley REIT Index. The Morgan Stanley REIT Index is a total-return index comprised of 121 of the most actively traded real estate investment trusts.

COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

LOGO

 

     2000    2001    2002    2003    2004    2005

WRIT

   $ 100    $ 111    $ 120    $ 145    $ 177    $ 167

Morgan Stanley REIT Index

   $ 100    $ 112    $ 117    $ 160    $ 210    $ 235

S&P 500

   $ 100    $ 88    $ 69    $ 88    $ 98    $ 103

 

9


Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Board maintains an Audit Committee, currently comprised of four of the Trust’s independent Trustees. The Board and the Audit Committee believe that the Audit Committee’s current member composition satisfies Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange’s listed company manual. The Audit Committee oversees the Trust’s financial process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. The independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the quality, and not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal controls over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Committee meets with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Trust’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Trust’s financial reporting.

The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm their judgments as to the quality, and not just the acceptability, of the Trust’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the committee under generally accepted auditing standards, including Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, “Communication with Audit Committees.” In addition, the Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence from management and the Trust, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by the Independence Standards Board, Standard No. 1, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committees.”

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 for filing with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

John M. Derrick, Jr., Audit Committee Chairman

John P. McDaniel, Audit Committee Member

Robert W. Pivik, Audit Committee Member

Susan J. Williams, Audit Committee Member

Principal Accounting Firm Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2005 by the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the public accountant’s independence.

 

     2005    2004   

Explanatory Notes

Audit Fees

   $ 751,700    $ 639,200    (a), (c)

Audit-Related Fees

   $ 0    $ 66,600    (b), (d), (e)

Tax Fees

   $ 53,650    $ 132,000    (b), (f)
                

Total Fees

   $ 805,350    $ 837,800   
                

 

(a) Includes fees and expenses related to the fiscal year audit and interim reviews, notwithstanding when the fees and expenses were billed or when the services rendered.

 

(b) Includes fees and expenses for services rendered from January through the end of the fiscal year, notwithstanding when the fees and expenses were billed.

 

(c) Audit fees include the annual audit fee and fees for comfort letters, attest services, consents, and assistance with and the review of documents filed with the SEC.

 

(d) Audit-related fees include fees incurred for consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, performance of agreed upon procedures and other audit or attest services not required by statute or regulation.

 

10


Table of Contents
(e) 2004 audit-related fees include fees incurred for consultation regarding Sarbanes-Oxley implementation.

 

(f) Fees for tax services, including tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires advance approval of all audit, audit-related, tax and other services performed by the independent auditor. The policy provides for pre-approval by the Audit Committee of specifically defined audit and non-audit services. Unless the specific service has been previously pre-approved with respect to that year, the Audit Committee must approve the permitted service before the independent auditor is engaged to perform it. The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the Audit Committee authority to approve permitted services provided that the Chair reports any decisions to the Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

 

11


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1:

ELECTION OF TRUSTEES

Mr. John M. Derrick, Jr. and Mr. Charles T. Nason stand for election as Trustees at the Annual Meeting, to serve for three years. It is intended that the proxies given to the persons named in the accompanying Proxy (unless otherwise indicated on such Proxy) will be voted for the election of Mr. John M. Derrick, Jr. and Mr. Charles T. Nason. Mr. Derrick and Mr. Nason currently serve as Trustees.

If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to stand for election for any reason not presently known or contemplated, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy will have discretionary authority to vote pursuant to the Proxy for a substitute nominee nominated by the Board.

The election of Trustees requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE ELECTION

OF MR. JOHN M. DERRICK, JR. AND MR. CHARLES T. NASON.

PROPOSAL 2:

AMEND WRIT’S DECLARATION OF TRUST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TRUSTEES THAT MAY BE ELECTED TO THE BOARD TO ELEVEN TRUSTEES

Article 8, Section 8.1 of our Declaration of Trust provides that “the number of Trustees shall not be less than three (3) nor more than seven (7).” The current size of the Board of Trustees is fixed at seven, and the number of Trustees may not be increased above seven without shareholder approval of an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation.

The Board of Trustees believes that it is in the best interests of WRIT and our shareholders to increase the maximum number of Trustees that may be fixed from time to time from seven up to eleven.

The Board has approved, and recommends that our shareholders approve, a proposal to amend Article 8, Section 8.1 of our Declaration of Trust as follows:

“The number of Trustees shall not be less than three (3) nor more than eleven (11), the exact number of which shall be determined from time to time by a resolution of the Board of Trustees.”

In addition, Article 8, Section 8.4 of the Declaration of Trust provides that “in case a vacancy in the number of Trustees shall occur through death, resignation, or removal (unless the vacancy occurring through removal has already been filled by the shareholders acting pursuant to the provisions of Section 10.2 hereof), the remaining Trustees or Trustee may fill such vacancy by appointing by an instrument in writing signed by a majority of the Trustees such person as they or he in their or his absolute discretion shall see fit, ....” We also propose to clarify that the Board of Trustees may also fill vacancies in the Board created by the enlargement of the Board between meetings of the shareholders.

Accordingly, the Board has also approved, and recommends that our shareholders approve, a proposal to amend Article 8, Section 8.4 of our Declaration of Trust as follows:

“In case a vacancy in the number of Trustees shall occur through an increase in the number of authorized Trustees, death, resignation, or removal (unless the vacancy occurring through removal has already been filled by the shareholders acting pursuant to the provisions of Section 10.2 hereof), the remaining Trustees or Trustee may fill such vacancy by appointing by an instrument in writing signed by a majority of the Trustees such person as they or he in their or his absolute discretion shall see fit, ....”

Articles of Amendment to WRIT’s Declaration of Trust including the foregoing amendments to Article 8 will be filed with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation if this Proposal is approved. We reserve the right to modify the form of the proposed amendment to the extent that it may be necessary to do so in order to comply with applicable law.

 

12


Table of Contents

Reasons For and Effect of Amendments

The Board of Trustees has determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of WRIT and its shareholders that Article 8 of the Declaration of Trust be amended to increase the maximum number of Trustees that may be elected to the Board and to make clear that the Board of Trustees has the power to set the size of the Board within the limits specified by the Declaration of Trust, as proposed to be amended, and to fill any vacancies created by enlarging the Board of Trustees between annual meetings of shareholders.

The purpose of the increase in the maximum number of Trustees to eleven is to provide the Board of Trustees with the flexibility to add Trustees to the Board whose skills and experience will benefit WRIT and the conduct of the operations of the Board of Trustees, including retaining additional Trustees who may be “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. In addition, the Board currently is comprised of six independent Trustees and one non-independent Trustee and has established three independent Board committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee, with each independent Trustee serving on two committees. The amendment would enable the Board to establish Board committees in a manner that would permit larger committees and provide more flexibility in rotation.

We are proposing to clarify that any vacancy on the Board of Trustees that results from an increase in the number of Trustees may be filled by a majority of the members of the Board of Trustees then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining Trustee. The Board of Trustees is divided into three classes, which means that at each annual meeting of shareholders Trustees of one of the three classes are elected for a term of three years to succeed those Trustees whose terms expire at that annual meeting. Accordingly, if shareholders approve the proposal to amend the Declaration of Trust to increase the maximum number of Trustees to eleven, the existing Board of Trustees could adopt a resolution increasing the Board size from seven up to eleven Trustees and appoint up to four new Trustees to the Board without further shareholder approval, and the additional Trustees would be added to the existing classes of Trustees as evenly as possible.

The Board of Trustees has unanimously adopted, and recommends that shareholders approve, an amendment to the Declaration of Trust increasing the maximum number of Trustees to eleven and clarifying that the Board has the power to vary the size of the Board and to fill vacancies in the Board created by the enlargement of the Board between meetings of the shareholders.

Vote Required for Approval

The affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 70% of the outstanding shares of beneficial interest entitled to vote thereon is required to approve the amendments to the Declaration of Trust. The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends a vote FOR approval of the amendments.

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL RELATED TO AMENDING WRIT’S DECLARATION OF TRUST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TRUSTEES THAT MAY BE ELECTED TO THE BOARD TO ELEVEN TRUSTEES.

OTHER MATTERS

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The firm of Ernst & Young LLP served as the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2005. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2006.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They are also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that Trustees, Executive Officers and persons who own more than 10 percent of the Shares file initial reports of ownership of the Shares and changes in such ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. To the Trust’s knowledge, based solely on a review of copies of forms submitted to the Trust during and with respect to 2005 and on written representations from our Trustees and Executive Officers, all required reports were filed on a timely basis during 2005.

 

13


Table of Contents

Annual Report

The Trust’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders is being mailed to shareholders concurrently with this Proxy Statement and does not form part of proxy solicitation material.

Code of Ethics

WRIT has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of its Trustees, Officers and employees. The Trust has made the Code of Ethics available on its website, www.writ.com. A copy of the code is also available upon written request. WRIT intends to post on its website any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the Code of Ethics promptly following the date of such amendment or waiver.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

WRIT has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Guidelines, as well as the Committee Charters, are available on the website, www.writ.com and upon written request.

Solicitation of Proxies

Solicitation of Proxies may be made by mail, personal interview, telephone or other means by Officers, Trustees and regular employees of the Trust for which they shall receive no compensation in addition to their normal compensation. The Trust may also request banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation material to the beneficial owners of Shares that those companies or persons hold of record. The Trust will reimburse these forwarding expenses. The cost of the solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Trust.

2007 Annual Meeting

Shareholders may present proposals to be considered for inclusion in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2007 Annual Meeting, provided they are received by the Trust no later than December 2, 2006 and are in compliance with applicable laws and SEC regulations.

Shareholder proposals to be brought before any meeting of shareholders or nominations of persons for election as a Trustee at any meeting of shareholders must be made pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Corporate Secretary. The notice must set forth certain information concerning such proposal or such shareholder and the nominees, as specified in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Trust’s Bylaws. The presiding Officer of the meeting will refuse to acknowledge any proposal not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures.

 

/s/ Laura M. Franklin
Laura M. Franklin
Corporate Secretary
March 28, 2006

 

14


Table of Contents

APPENDIX A

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE/NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER

Adopted as of February 20, 2003

Revised as of September 13, 2005

Committee Purpose

The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee’s (the “Committee”) purpose shall be to identify individuals qualified to become Trustee members, and to select, or to recommend that the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) select, the Trustee nominees for the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders; and develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“Trust”), thereby helping to ensure that the Trust is properly managed to protect and enhance shareholder value and to meet the Trust’s obligations to shareholders, to its customers, to the industry and to the law.

Committee Composition and Operation

The Committee shall consist of no fewer than three, nor more than six Trustees, none of whom are employees of the Trust or any of its affiliates and all of whom are independent as required under the rules promulgated from time to time by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Board shall have the authority to remove at any time one or more of the members of the Committee, to fill any vacancy that may exist on the Committee or to fill any newly created Committee membership caused by the increase in the size of the Committee.

The Committee shall meet at least once annually, or more frequently as circumstances require, and shall endeavor to meet periodically during the year to receive updates from management or its outside advisers concerning issues of relevance to the Committee (such as new developments and trends in corporate governance). Each meeting shall include a time of executive session.

The Committee may create one or more sub–Committees to which it may delegate some or all of its authority.

The Committee may make such rules of procedure as it deems necessary or appropriate for its efficient functioning, including with respect to notice of and presence at meetings of the Committee.

Committee Duties and Responsibilities

 

  1. The Committee shall develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Trust, including recommendations regarding the structure, charter, practices and policies of the Board, including recommending amendments to the Trust’s Charter and By–Laws.

 

  2. The Committee shall assess the Board’s performance and effectiveness and ensure that appropriate skill sets are considered when seeking new Trustee members.

 

  3. The Committee shall ensure that processes are in place for development of corporate strategy and structure including management development, management succession and management performance criteria.

 

  4. The Committee shall ensure that oversight of technology and systems used by the Trust are adequate to properly run the business and for it to remain competitive.

 

A-1


Table of Contents
  5. The Committee shall review, and report to the Board the Committee’s recommendations on, the Chairman of the Board’s proposals with regard to Committee chairmanships and assignments.

 

  6. The Committee shall recommend to the Board candidates (a) for nomination for election as Trustees by shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and (b) for election by the Board for Trustees if vacancies occur other than at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm to be used to identify Trustee candidates, including sole authority to approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms. Criteria considered by the Committee shall include, among others, the following: the need for independence of a majority of the Board, as required under the rules promulgated from time to time by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission; potential nominees’ experience in relevant industry; the Board’s commitment to diversity (e.g., gender, race, geography) among Board members; a need for complimentary skills among board members (e.g., financial literacy for Audit Committee members); the number of other boards on which a potential nominee serves; desire for continuity; and, highest standards of ethics and integrity.

 

  7. The Committee shall conduct an annual evaluation of its performance of its duties and the continuing adequacy of its charter, which may include presentations by advisers retained by the Committee for this purpose.

 

  8. The Committee shall report to the Board at least annually (and more frequently, if the Committee believes its activities merit such reporting) as to the Committee’s activities.

 

A-2


Table of Contents

APPENDIX B

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

Adopted as of February 20, 2003

Revised as of September 13, 2005

Committee Purpose

The Compensation Committee’s (the “Committee”) purpose shall be to assist the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) in the discharge of its responsibilities relating to compensation of the persons named as executive officers of the Trust in its annual meeting proxy statement and any other persons identified as Executives herein, to make recommendations to the Board on the employee compensation and benefit plan matters described below, and to produce an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in the Trust’s proxy statement, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations.

Committee Composition and Operation

The Committee shall consist of no fewer than three or more than six Trustees, none of whom are employees of the Trust or any of its affiliates and all of whom are independent as required under the rules promulgated from time to time by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Board shall have the authority to remove at any time one or more of the members of the Committee, to fill any vacancy that may exist on the Committee or to fill any newly created Committee membership caused by the increase in the size of the Committee.

The Committee may create one or more sub–Committees to which it may delegate some or all of its authority, provided however, that it may not delegate to a sub–Committee the power and authority to authorize the issuance of shares of the Trust’s Shares of Beneficial Interest or options to purchase shares (or securities convertible into or exercisable for any such shares or options).

The Committee may make such rules of procedure as it deems necessary and appropriate for its efficient functioning, including with respect to notice of and presence at meetings of the Committee.

The Committee shall meet at least once annually or more frequently as circumstances require, and shall endeavor to meet periodically during the year to receive updates from management or its outside advisers concerning issues of relevance to the Committee.

Committee Duties and Responsibilities

 

  1. The committee shall recommend to the Board of Trustees an overall executive total remuneration policy. This policy will take into account the appropriateness and competitiveness of each component of executive compensation as well as the appropriateness and competitiveness of the total remuneration package for WRIT executives.

 

  2. The Committee shall recommend to the Board of Trustees the goals and objectives on which the CEO’s compensation will be based. The Committee will also evaluate the performance of the CEO each year, based on the goals and objectives approved by the Board.

 

  3.

The Committee shall have the authority to recommend for approval to the Board of Trustees the CEO’s compensation level based on the Committee’s annual performance evaluation of the CEO. In evaluating the long-term incentive component of CEO compensation, the Committee should consider the Trust’s performance and relative shareholder return under the Long-Term Incentive Plan for

 

B-1


Table of Contents
 

Officers of the Trust, the value of similar incentive awards to CEOs at comparable organizations, and the awards given to the Trust’s CEO in past years.

 

  4. The Committee shall evaluate the maximum salary limit for officers and employees that is recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and determine the reasonableness of compensation for each officer of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust and any employee whose salary exceeds the level of authorization held by the Chief Executive Officer. The results of such evaluation and recommendations shall be submitted to the Board for approval.

 

  5. The Committee shall recommend to the Board of Trustees the salaries and other compensation (including Annual Short-Term Incentive and Long Term Incentive Awards) of the five most highly compensated officers of the Trust, and any individual who the Board has determined to be an executive officer subject to the reporting requirements of the Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (together, the “Executives”). In addition, the Committee shall recommend to the full Board the salaries and other compensation of any individual who is not an Executive but whose total compensation (including Annual Short-Term Incentive and Long Term Incentive Awards) exceeds the total compensation (including such incentive compensation) of the lowest ranked proxy reported compensation. The Committee shall review and make recommendations to the Board with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans, including the Long Term Incentive Plan, Short Term Incentive Plan, Executive Benefit Plans, and Tax Qualified Retirement Plans.

 

  6. The Committee shall oversee the administration of the Annual Short Term and Long Term Incentive Plans and all Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (“SERPs”) and Tax Qualified Retirement Plans of the Trust and its subsidiaries, if any, as follows:

 

  a. Periodically evaluate the terms and administration of the Company’s Annual Short Term and Long Term Incentive Plans and all SERPs and Tax Qualified Retirement Plans to assure that they are structured and administered in a manner consistent with the Company’s goals and objectives as to participation in such plans, target annual incentive awards, corporate financial goals and actual awards paid to the Company’s executive officers.

 

  7. Periodically the Committee shall evaluate the compensation of Trustees, including for service on Board Committees and taking into account the compensation of Directors at other comparable companies, and make recommendations to the Board regarding any adjustments in Trustee compensation that the Committee considers appropriate.

 

  8. The Committee shall conduct an annual evaluation of its performance of its duties and an annual review of its charter, which may include presentations by advisers retained by the Committee for this purpose.

 

  9. The Committee shall produce an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in the Trust’s proxy statement, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations.

 

  10. The Committee shall report to the Board at least annually (and more frequently, if the Committee believes its activities merit such reporting) as to the Committee’s activities.

 

  11. The Committee shall have sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consulting firm or other advisers it may desire to use to assist it in the evaluation of Trustee, CEO or Executive compensation or to discharge its other duties hereunder, including sole authority to approve the firm’s fees and other retention terms.

 

B-2


Table of Contents

APPENDIX C

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Adopted as of February 20, 2003

Revised as of November 29, 2004

Committee Purpose

The Audit Committee’s (the “Committee”) purpose shall be to (A) represent and assist the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) in oversight of (1) the integrity of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust’s (the “Trust”) accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of the Trust’s financial statements, (2) the Trust’s processes for compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of the Trust’s internal audit function and independent auditors; and (B) prepare the report that Securities and Exchange Commission rules require be included in the Trust’s annual proxy statement. The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board in discharging its responsibility of oversight, but the existence of the Committee does not alter the traditional roles and responsibilities of the Trust’s management and the independent auditor with respect to the accounting and control functions and financial statement presentation.

Committee Composition and Operation

The Committee shall consist of no fewer than three Trustees, none of whom are employees of the Trust or any of its affiliates and all of whom are independent as required under the rules promulgated from time to time by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission. No Committee member may serve on the audit committee of more than three public companies.

The Board shall have the authority to remove at any time one or more of the members of the Committee, to fill any vacancy that may exist on the Committee or to fill any newly created Committee membership caused by the increase in the size of the Committee.

The Committee shall meet at least four times annually, or more frequently as circumstances require.

The Committee may create one or more sub–Committees to which it may delegate some or all of its authority.

The Committee may make such rules of procedure as it deems necessary or appropriate for its efficient functioning.

Committee Duties and Responsibilities

 

  1. The Committee shall have sole authority to (A) retain and terminate the Trust’s independent auditors; (B) pre–approve all audit engagement fees and terms, including the scope and timing of the audit, in conformance with the approval requirements as promulgated from time to time by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (C) pre–approve any significant audit–related relationship with the independent auditor. The Committee shall have sole authority to evaluate and determine whether consulting services to be obtained by the Trust are “audit–related” or “non–audit related” for purposes of applying the Trust’s policies and the applicable rules as promulgated from time to time by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission with regard to such services.

 

  2. The Committee shall be directly responsible for oversight of the work of any independent auditor employed by the Trust for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work (including resolution of disagreements between management and the auditor regarding financial reporting), and each such independent auditor shall report directly to the Committee.

 

C-1


Table of Contents
  3. The Committee shall, at least annually, obtain and review a report by the independent auditor describing: the firm’s internal quality control procedures; any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or peer review, of the firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and (to assess the auditor’s independence) all relationships between the auditor and the Trust.

After reviewing the foregoing report, and the independent auditor’s work throughout the year, the Audit Committee will evaluate the auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence. The evaluation will include the review and evaluation of the lead partner of the independent auditor. In making its evaluation, the Audit Committee will take into account the opinions of management and the Trust’s internal auditors. In addition to assuring the regular rotation of the lead audit partner as required by law, the Audit Committee will further consider whether, in order to assure continuing auditor independence, there should be regular rotation of the audit firm itself. The Audit Committee will present its conclusions with respect to the independent auditor to the full Board.

 

  4. The Committee shall review the organization and schedule of annual audits conducted by the Trust’s internal auditor and review with management and the internal auditors significant recommendations made by the internal auditors and the implementation of those recommendations.

 

  5. The Committee shall review periodically with the independent auditor and management the Trust’s policies and procedures with respect to internal auditing, accounting and financial controls, as well as any internal control report required to be included in the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10–K. This review shall also include a review, upon completion of the annual audit, of the reports or opinions proposed to be rendered in connection with the annual audit; the independent auditor’s views of the Trust’s financial and accounting personnel; the cooperation which the independent auditor received in the course of its review; and any significant findings of the independent auditor with respect to change in accounting principles and practices, significant transactions outside the normal course of the Trust’s business and any recommendations which the independent auditor may have with respect to improving internal accounting controls, choice of accounting principles or management systems.

 

  6. The Committee shall review and discuss the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements with management and the independent auditor, including the Trust’s disclosures in its Annual and Quarterly reports under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

  7. The Committee shall review with the independent auditor and with management the Trust’s conflict of interest policies.

 

  8. The Committee shall report regularly to the Board, and review with the full Board any issues that arise with respect to the quality or integrity of the Trust’s financial statements, the Trust’s compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, the performance and independence of the Trust’s independent auditors, or the performance of the internal audit function. The Committee shall also make such recommendations to the Board as the Committee deems appropriate.

 

  9. The Committee shall meet separately, periodically, with management, with internal auditors and with independent auditors.

 

  10. The Committee shall discuss and review with management the Trust’s guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including the Trust’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. However, the Committee’s duties and responsibilities in this regard do not alter the obligation of the CEO and senior management to assess and manage the Trust’s exposure to risk.

 

C-2


Table of Contents
  11. The Committee shall review with the independent auditor (A) any audit problems or difficulties (including any restrictions on the scope of the independent auditor’s activities or on access to requested information, and any significant disagreements with management); and (B) management’s response. The review will also include discussion of the responsibilities, budget and staffing the Trust’s internal audit function.

 

  12. The Committee shall set clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent auditor.

 

  13. The Committee shall, as appropriate to carry out its duties, obtain advice and assistance from independent legal, accounting or other advisors. The Committee shall have full power and authority to retain such advisors as and when the Committee deems it appropriate to do so, and to authorize the payment of compensation any such advisors, without first seeking Trustees’ approval.

 

  14. The Committee shall conduct an annual evaluation of its performance of its duties and the continuing adequacy of its charter. While the fundamental responsibility for the Trust’s financial statements and disclosure rests with management and the independent auditor, the Committee shall review (A) major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations, including any significant changes in the Trust’s selection or application of accounting principles, and major issues as to the adequacy of the Trust’s internal controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies; (B) analyses prepared by management and/or the independent auditor setting forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of the effects of alternative GAAP methods on the financial statements; (C) the effect of regulator and accounting initiatives, as well as off–balance sheet structures, if any, on the financial statements of the Trust; and (D) earnings press releases (paying particular attention to any use of “pro–forma,” or “adjusted” non–GAAP information), as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies.

 

  15. The Committee shall establish procedures for (A) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Trust regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and (B) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Trust of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

 

  16. The Committee shall discuss the types of information to be disclosed and the type of presentation to be made in earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies. The Committee need not, however, discuss in advance each earnings release. The Committee shall discuss at least Annual and Quarterly releases before they are published.

 

C-3


Table of Contents

FRONT OF PROXY CARD

The Board recommends a vote FOR Item 1.

 

1. Election of two Trustees.

                                       FOR             WITHHELD

 

             FOR          ¨    

 

¨

   WITHHELD    Nominees (for the terms

        ALL            

     FROM ALL   

stated in the Proxy Statement):

01. Mr. John M. Derrick, Jr.

NOMINEES    

     NOMINEES   
        02. Mr. Charles T. Nason

 

   
¨    For all nominees except as written above

The Board recommends a vote FOR Item 2.

 

   FOR    AGAINST    ABSTAIN

2.      Declaration of Trust amendment increasing the maximum number of Trustees that
may be elected to the Board to eleven Trustees.

   ¨    ¨    ¨
        

3.      Such other matters as may come before the meeting.

        

IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE NOMINATED TRUSTEES AND “FOR” PROPOSAL 2. PROXIES WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR SPECIFIED.

PLEASE vote at once. It is important. Please mark your choice in black ink.

 

SIGNATURE                              

   DATE                        SIGNATURE                                                                    DATE                       

NOTE: SIGNATURE(S) MUST CORRESPOND EXACTLY WITH NAME(S) AS IMPRINTED HEREON.

When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give the full title as such and if the signer is a corporation, please sign with the full corporate name by a duly authorized officer. If shares are held in the name of more than one person, all named holders must sign the proxy.

 

1


Table of Contents

REAR OF PROXY CARD:

WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS MAY 26, 2006

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

The undersigned shareholder of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust appoints Sara L. Grootwassink and Laura M. Franklin with full power of substitution, as proxy to vote all shares of the undersigned in Washington Real Estate Investment Trust at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 26, 2006, and at any adjournment thereof, with like effect and as if the undersigned were personally present and voting upon the following matters:

(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE.)

 

2