Edgar Filing: GENERAL CABLE CORP /DE/

DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:


¨	Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x	Definitive Proxy Statement

¨	Definitive Additional Materials

¨	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
General Cable Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x	No fee required.

¨	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

	(5)	Total fee paid:




¨	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

¨	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:

	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.

	(3)	Filing Party:

	(4)	Date Filed:

GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION

4 Tesseneer Drive

Highland Heights, Kentucky 41076

Telephone (859) 572-8000

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Thursday, May 14, 2015, at our offices located at 4 Tesseneer Drive, Highland Heights, Kentucky 41076.

We once again are pleased to utilize Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow us to deliver proxy materials over the Internet to expedite our stockholders’ receipt of these materials. You will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. This Notice will include instructions on how to access proxy materials and vote. At your discretion, you may request hard copies and a proxy card for voting by mail by following the instructions on the Notice. We encourage you to read the Proxy Statement carefully.

As you will note from the enclosed proxy materials, the Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the proposals set forth in the Proxy Statement.

Sincerely,

LOGO

GREGORY B. KENNY

President and Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2015

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE VOTING METHOD YOU SELECT.

GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION

4 Tesseneer Drive

Highland Heights, Kentucky 41076

Telephone (859) 572-8000

NOTICE OF THE 2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of General Cable Corporation (“General Cable”) will be held on Thursday, May 14, 2015, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, at our offices located at 4 Tesseneer Drive, Highland Heights, Kentucky 41076, to consider and act upon the following proposals:

Election of seven directors;

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as General Cable’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2015;

Approval on an advisory basis of the compensation of our named executive officers;

Approval of the Amended and Restated General Cable Stock Incentive Plan; and

Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 16, 2015 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Emerson C. Moser

Corporate Secretary

March 30, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY			4

VOTING PROCEDURES			8

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS			11

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			16

REPORT OF OUR AUDIT COMMITTEE			25

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT			26

OTHER COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MATTERS			26

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SHARES			27

SIGNIFICANT STOCKHOLDERS			29

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION			30

Director Compensation Table			31
Director’s Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2014			32

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS			33

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: COMPENSATION TABLES			53

Summary Compensation Table			53
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2014 Table			56
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2014			57
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2014			59
Pension Benefits for 2014			60
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table for 2014			60
Change in Control and Other Post-Employment Payments and Benefits			61

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP			71

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			72

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED GENERAL CABLE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN			73

OTHER INFORMATION			88

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Date:		May 14, 2015
Time:		11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time
Place:		General Cable Corporation’s offices at 4 Tesseneer Drive, Highland Heights, Kentucky
Record Date:		March 16, 2015
Voting:		Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to one vote per share on matters presented at the Annual Meeting

Voting Matters and the Board’s Recommendation


Agenda Item	Board Vote Recommendation	Page Reference
Election of seven directors	FOR each Director Nominee	11
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as General Cable’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2015	FOR	71
Approval on an advisory basis of the compensation of our named executive officers	FOR	72
Approval of the Amended and Restated General Cable Stock Incentive Plan	FOR	73

In addition to these matters, stockholders may be asked to vote on such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

Director Nominees


Name	Age	Director Since	Occupation	Independent	Position/Committee Memberships
John E. Welsh, III	64	1997	President of Avalon Capital Partners LLC	Yes	Non-Executive Chairman Corporate Governance Committee
Sallie B. Bailey	55	2013	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation	Yes	Audit Committee (Chair) Corporate Governance Committee
Edward Childs Hall, III	55	2014	Former Executive Vice President – Chief Operating Officer of Atlantic Power Corporation	Yes	Corporate Governance Committee
Gregory B. Kenny	62	1997	President and Chief Executive Officer of General Cable	No


Name	Age	Director Since	Occupation	Independent	Position/Committee Memberships
Gregory E. Lawton	64	1998	Former President and Chief Executive Officer of JohnsonDiversey, Inc.	Yes	Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) Compensation Committee
Craig P. Omtvedt	65	2004	Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fortune Brands, Inc.	Yes	Compensation Committee (Chair) Audit Committee
Patrick M. Prevost	59	2010	President and Chief Executive Officer of Cabot Corporation	Yes	Audit Committee Compensation Committee

See “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” on page 11.

Ratification of Auditors

As a matter of good governance, we are asking stockholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2015. See “Proposal 2: Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP” on page 71.

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

We are asking stockholders to cast an advisory, non-binding vote to approve compensation awarded to our named executive officers. Our philosophy on executive compensation is that we must align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders by incentivizing our named executive officers to deliver sustainable, long-term stockholder value. See “Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” on page 72.

Whenever we refer in this Proxy Statement to the “named executive officers”, we are referring to those executive officers that we identified in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 53.

Amended and Restated General Cable Stock Incentive Plan

We currently maintain the General Cable Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was originally effective as of May 10, 2005. In March 2015, our Board of Directors adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the General Cable Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (the “Amended Plan”), which is an amendment and restatement of the 2005 Plan. We are asking stockholders to approve the Amended Plan in order to (i) extend the term of the Amended Plan until May 14, 2025, (ii) authorize additional shares, (iii) meet New York Stock Exchange listing requirements, (iv) permit (but not require) certain awards under the Amended Plan to qualify for an exemption from the $1 million deduction limit under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and (v) make other appropriate changes. See “Proposal 4: Approval of the Amended and Restated General Cable Stock Incentive Plan” on page 73.

Executive Compensation Highlights

Our philosophy on executive compensation is to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders by incentivizing them to deliver sustainable, long-term stockholder value. Our Compensation Committee reviews our compensation program components, targets and payouts on an annual basis. In recent years, we have continued to adjust our compensation program to further align compensation received by our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and to provide compensation that is tied directly

to performance. We seek to align pay and performance under our executive compensation programs by making a significant portion of our named executive officer’s compensation dependent on:

•

the achievement of specific annual and long-term strategic and financial goals; and

•

the realization of increased stockholder value.

Set forth below are key highlights of our executive compensation program that are further discussed in the Executive Compensation: Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement beginning on page 33:

•

The compensation program offered to our executive officers is comprised of a mix between base salary and variable opportunities;

•

A majority of our named executive officers’ compensation is weighted towards variable compensation (annual and long-term incentives), where the actual amounts earned may differ from targeted amounts based on corporate and individual performance. For example, 86% of the CEO’s 2014 target compensation was variable with performance;

•

Our annual cash incentive program includes targets that emphasize both strong financial performance from operations and strategic measures designed to create and sustain long-term success of the business; and

•

Actual compensation is dependent upon many factors, including, but not limited to, our financial results, the executive’s level of responsibilities, growth potential, performance, tenure, and internal equity.

The Compensation Committee approved significant changes to our executive compensation program in 2014, including:

•

transitioned from using operating income greater than $1 to adjusted EBITDA divided by $100 million being greater than 1 as the umbrella trigger (i.e., performance threshold triggering potential bonus payouts) under our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) and restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards;

•

changed the secondary financial performance metrics for the AIP to adjusted EBITDA and cash conversion cycle days (“CCCD”);

•

added a regional performance component to the performance metrics and created different performance weightings for corporate and regional executives;

•

replaced option awards with awards of performance stock units (“PSUs”); and

•

issued an even mix of PSU awards and RSU awards.

Our Compensation Committee made these changes as it believes they are consistent with our compensation philosophy, pay for performance environment and market trends.

Corporate Governance Highlights

Set forth below are highlights of our corporate governance practices that are further discussed in the “Corporate Governance” section of this Proxy Statement beginning on page 16:

•

Six of our seven directors are independent (under NYSE standards) and half of our independent directors have joined the Board during the past five years.

•

Our Board leadership consists of a non-executive Chairman of the Board and independent Committee Chairs.

•

We have engaged an executive search firm to assist us in identifying an additional operations-experienced independent director.

•

We value diversity, which is exhibited in our directors’ gender, experience, and skills.

•

Our Board met 9 times in 2014 with executive sessions of independent directors at each regularly scheduled Board meeting and as deemed necessary.

•

We have policies governing mandatory director resignations as well as suggested director retirement at age 70.

•

Directors are elected annually with a majority vote in an uncontested election.

•

A robust director nomination process is used to identify talented and diverse Board members.

•

Board and Committees conduct annual self-evaluations.

•

Non-employee directors receive a significant portion of compensation in equity.

•

Each of our non-employee directors who has been a Board member for at least five years was in compliance with our Stock Ownership Guidelines as of December 31, 2014. These Guidelines require our directors to maintain significant ownership levels of General Cable common stock.

•

A “Say on Pay” advisory vote is conducted annually. Our Compensation Committee considers prior voting results of the “Say on Pay” advisory vote as it makes future executive compensation decisions.

•

Stockholders are asked to ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm annually.

•

In January 2015, we hired Kurt L. Drake to fill our newly created standalone position of Chief Compliance Officer. Mr. Drake has 19 years of experience in compliance and finance.

PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors of General Cable Corporation (“General Cable,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is providing this Proxy Statement for the solicitation of proxies from holders of outstanding General Cable common stock for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) on May 14, 2015, and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Thursday, May 14, 2015, at the Company’s offices at 4 Tesseneer Drive, Highland Heights, Kentucky. Beginning on or about March 30, 2015, General Cable will send the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and release its proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement, proxy form, and its Annual Report to Stockholders for 2014, to all stockholders entitled to receive notice and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

VOTING PROCEDURES

Your Vote is Very Important

Our Annual Meeting this year is being held at our offices in Highland Heights, Kentucky, which you are invited to attend. Under rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) beginning on or about March 30, 2015 to our stockholders of record. The Notice includes instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy of the proxy materials. Whether or not you plan to attend our Annual Meeting, please take the time to vote.

Voting by Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. We will give you a ballot when you arrive. If you do not wish to vote in person or if you will not be attending the Annual Meeting, you may vote by proxy. You may vote by proxy over the Internet, by mail, or by telephone following the instructions provided in your proxy card or Notice.

Voting by Beneficial Owners. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” If you are a beneficial owner and you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from the organization that holds your shares. If you do not wish to vote in person or you will not be attending the Annual Meeting, you may vote by proxy. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please check your proxy card or Notice, or contact your broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian to determine if you will be able to vote over the Internet or by telephone.

Voting by participants in the General Cable Retirement Plans. If you are a participant in the General Cable Retirement Plans you can instruct the trustee how to vote the shares that are allocated to your account. If you do not provide the trustee with instructions as to how to vote the shares allocated to your account, the trustee will vote such shares in the same proportion to instructions actually received from other participants in the General Cable Retirement Plans. To provide instruction to the trustee on how to vote shares allocated to your account in the General Cable Retirement Plans, vote your plan shares by proxy over the Internet, by mail, or by telephone following the instructions provided in your proxy card or Notice.

Voting by participants in the General Cable Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”). If you are a participant in the DCP, you can instruct the trustee of the “rabbi trust” that was established in connection with the DCP how to vote (i) deferred shares held in the “rabbi trust” that are allocated to your DCP account on a notional basis, and (ii) shares held by the General Cable stock fund in the “rabbi trust” that are allocated to your DCP account on a notional basis as phantom stock units (shares referenced in (i) and (ii), collectively referred to as “DCP Shares”). If you do not provide the trustee with instructions as to how to vote the DCP Shares allocated to your DCP account, the trustee will vote such shares as instructed by the Company. To provide instruction to the trustee on how to vote the DCP Shares allocated to your account in the DCP, vote your DCP Shares by proxy over the Internet, by mail, or by telephone following the instructions provided in your proxy card or Notice.

Record Date

Holders of record of General Cable common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at the close of business on March 16, 2015 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements. On the Record Date, 49,037,315 shares of General Cable common stock were issued and outstanding.

How to Revoke Your Proxy

You may revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. You may do so by (i) voting again on a later date on the Internet or by telephone (only your latest Internet or telephone proxy submitted before the Annual Meeting will be counted); (ii) sending a written statement of revocation to the Secretary of General Cable at the Company’s headquarters at 4 Tesseneer Drive, Highland Heights, Kentucky 41076; or (iii) submitting a properly signed proxy having a later date. You may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. However, your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy.

Vote Required and Method of Counting Votes

•

Number of Shares Outstanding. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 49,037,315 shares of General Cable common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

•

Vote Per Share. You are entitled to one vote per share on matters presented at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.

•

Quorum. A majority of the shares entitled to vote, present or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (i.e., when a broker does not have authority to vote on a specific issue) are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum.

•

Vote Required and Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes. The table below summarizes the votes required for approval of each matter to be brought before the Annual Meeting, as well as the treatment of abstentions and broker non-votes. If you sign and return a proxy but do not specify how you want your shares voted, your shares will be voted FOR the director nominees and FOR the other proposals listed below.


Proposal Number	Proposal	Vote Required for Approval of Each Item	Abstentions	Broker Non-Votes
1	Election of Directors	Under our By-laws, each director shall be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to that director. In other words, the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee must exceed the votes cast “against” that nominee.	No effect	Not taken into account
2	Ratification of Appointment of Auditors	Under our By-laws, a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on Proposal 2 is required to approve this proposal.	Counted as “against”	Not applicable
3	Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation	Under our By-laws, a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on Proposal 3 is required to approve this proposal.	Counted as “against”	Not taken into account
4	Approval of the Amended and Restated General Cable Stock Incentive Plan	Under our By-laws, a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on Proposal 4 is required to approve this proposal.*	Counted as “against”	Not taken into account

*	Under NYSE rules, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is also required to approve this proposal. Under the NYSE’s rules, an abstention is treated as a vote cast “against” the proposal.

Please note that brokers may not use discretionary authority to vote shares on Proposals 1, 3 and 4 if they have not received instructions from their clients. Please vote your proxy or deliver instructions to your broker so your vote can be counted. Broker non-votes will have no effect on any of the proposals.

Discretionary Voting Power

The Board is not aware of any matters other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matter should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons authorized by the accompanying proxy will vote and act with respect thereto in what, according to their judgment, is in the interests of the Company and its stockholders. If any nominee is unable (or for whatever reason declines) to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, proxies may be voted for the election of a qualified substitute nominee selected by the Board.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our By-laws provide that our business shall be managed by or under the direction of a board of directors of not less than three nor more than nine directors, which number shall be fixed from time to time by the Board. As of the date of the Annual Meeting, the Board has fixed the number of directors at seven. The Board intends to increase the size of the Board to eight directors and has commenced a process to identify and appoint an additional operations-experienced independent director. The Company has engaged an executive search firm to assist in the process.

Our Board has nominated seven directors for election at the Annual Meeting to serve until the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Each nomination for director was based upon the recommendation of our Corporate Governance Committee and each nominee for director is a current member of the Board. All nominees have consented to be named and have indicated their intent to serve if elected. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees named below will be unable to serve as a director if elected.

Pursuant to our director retirement policy, Robert L. Smialek retired from the Board at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders due to his attaining 70 years of age during his then current term. On July 28, 2014, the Board filled the vacancy created by Mr. Smialek’s retirement and appointed Edward Childs Hall, III to serve as a director of our Company until he stands for election at the Annual Meeting and until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Mr. Smialek served as an independent director (as defined under the listing standards of the NYSE and our Corporate Governance Principles and Guidelines), Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Corporate Governance Committee until his retirement from the Board.

Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

Set forth on the following pages is certain information relating to the background, experience and qualifications of the individuals nominated by the Board of Directors to stand for election at the Annual Meeting.

Director Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting


John E. Welsh, III Age 64 Director since 1997 Non-Executive Chairman of the Board and Member of the Corporate Governance Committee		Mr. Welsh has served as President of Avalon Capital Partners LLC, an investment firm focused on private equity and public securities investments since 2002. From October 2000 to December 2002, he was a Managing Director of CIP Management LLC, the management company for Continuation Investments Group Inc. From November 1992 to December 1999, he served as Managing Director and Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of SkyTel Communications, Inc. (“SkyTel”) and as a Director of SkyTel from September 1992 until December 1999. During that period, he served as Chief Financial Officer and President and Chief Executive Officer of the International Division. Prior to 1992, Mr. Welsh was a Managing Director in the Investment Banking Division of Prudential Securities, Inc., and served as Co-Head of the Mergers and Acquisitions Department. Mr. Welsh has served as a director of various public companies, including Spreckels Industries, Inc., SkyTel, York International, and Integrated Electrical Services (NASDAQ: IESC). Mr. Welsh currently serves on the board of Liberty Broad Band (NASDAQ: LBRDA). Mr. Welsh has (i) a strong financial background in investment banking and investment management; (ii) leadership and collaboration skills; (iii) substantial experience involving acquisitions and strategic alliances; and (iv) a background in telecommunications products and services. Mr. Welsh’s investment management and acquisition experience and refined leadership skills have been critical in the creation of a strong, independent Board of Directors.

Sallie B. Bailey Age 55 Director since 2013 Chair of the Audit Committee and Member of the Corporate Governance Committee		Ms. Bailey has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (NYSE: LPX), a leading manufacturer of engineered wood building products for residential, industrial, and light commercial construction, since December 2011. Ms. Bailey previously served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ferro Corporation (NYSE: FOE), a global specialty materials company, from January 2007 to July 2010. Prior to that, she held senior management positions of increasing responsibility with The Timken Company (NYSE: TKR), a global producer of engineered bearings and alloy steel, from 1995 to 2006, lastly as Senior Vice President, Finance and Controller. Earlier in her career, she was an audit supervisor for Deloitte & Touche LLP and Assistant Treasurer at Tenneco, Inc. Ms. Bailey has (i) extensive experience as a financial executive with broad knowledge of financial controls and systems; (ii) substantial leadership experience in domestic and international business; (iii) a strong background in acquisition, divestitures, and strategic alliances; and (iv) significant management experience in commodity-based businesses. Ms. Bailey’s extensive financial leadership experience in global, publicly traded companies, knowledge of financial controls and systems, and understanding of operating a commodity-based business have made her a valuable member of the Board and Chair of the Audit Committee.


Edward (“Ned”) Childs Hall, III Age: 55 Director since 2014 Member of the Corporate Governance Committee		Mr. Hall served as Executive Vice President – Chief Operating Officer of Atlantic Power Corporation, a publicly traded power generation and infrastructure company (NYSE: AT), from April 2013 through February 2015. Prior to joining Atlantic Power, Mr. Hall spent more than 24 years working in the energy sector at AES Corporation, a publicly traded power company (NYSE: AES). While at AES Corporation, Mr. Hall held various positions including Managing Director, Global Business Development from 2003 to 2005; President, Wind Generation from 2005 to 2008; President, North America from 2008 to 2011; and Chief Operating Officer, Global Generation from 2011 to 2013. Mr. Hall served as Chairman of the Board of American Wind Energy Association (“AWEA”) from 2010 to 2011 and as a Member of the AWEA Board from 2005 to 2013. Mr. Hall has (i) extensive operating and management experience in power generation, transmission and distribution companies; (ii) a deep understanding of the global energy sector and the challenges and opportunities presented in the energy generation, transmission and distribution sector; and (iii) a deep understanding of alternative energy generation technology and economics. Mr. Hall’s relevant industry experience made him a valuable addition to the Board and Corporate Governance Committee in 2014.

Gregory B. Kenny Age 62 Director since 1997 President and Chief Executive Officer of General Cable		Mr. G. Kenny has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of General Cable since August 2001. He was President and Chief Operating Officer of General Cable from May 1999 to August 2001. From March 1997 to May 1999, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of General Cable. From June 1994 to March 1997, he was Executive Vice President of the subsidiary of General Cable which was General Cable’s immediate predecessor. Mr. G. Kenny is a director of a number of General Cable subsidiaries. He also is a director of Cardinal Health Incorporated (NYSE: CAH) and Ingredion Incorporated (NYSE: INGR). Mr. G. Kenny previously was a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Cincinnati Branch and IDEX Corporation (NYSE: IEX). On October 29, 2014, we announced that Mr. G. Kenny will transition out of his role as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. See “Executive Compensation: Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Changes in Executive Officers.” Mr. G. Kenny has (i) extensive operating and managerial experience in domestic and international businesses, including global wire and cable company operations; (ii) leadership and communication skills; (iii) substantial experience in financial matters; (iv) extensive experience in advancing growth strategies, including acquisitions and strategic alliances; and (v) broad experience in corporate governance. His expertise in the wire and cable industry and continued leadership in addressing the issues facing our Company have provided our Board with the insight necessary to plan strategically for our Company’s future success.


Gregory E. Lawton Age 64 Director since 1998 Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee and Member of the Compensation Committee		Mr. Lawton has been a consultant since March 2006. From October 2000 to February 2006, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of JohnsonDiversey, Inc. From January 1999 until September 2000, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Johnson Wax Professional. Prior to joining Johnson Wax, Mr. Lawton was President of NuTone Inc., a subsidiary of Williams plc based in Cincinnati, Ohio, from 1994 to 1998. From 1989 to 1994, Mr. Lawton served with Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) where he was Vice President and General Manager of several consumer product groups. He is also a director of Stepan Company (NYSE: SCL). Mr. Lawton has (i) substantial operating and management experience in manufacturing businesses and in application of technology to business; (ii) a strong background in marketing, sales, and human resources management; and (iii) significant experience involving acquisitions and leading a global business. Mr. Lawton’s extensive operational and executive management experience and understanding of corporate governance matters have proven to be valuable to our Board and in his position as Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee.

Craig P. Omtvedt Age 65 Director since 2004 Chair of the Compensation Committee and Member of the Audit Committee		Mr. Omtvedt served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fortune Brands, Inc., a former leading consumer products company (formerly NYSE: FO), from 2000 until his retirement in October 2011 and as a consultant to Beam Inc. (NYSE: BEAM), the successor to Fortune Brands, during 2012. Previously, he held positions with Fortune Brands as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from 1998 to 1999; Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from 1997 to 1998; Vice President, Deputy Controller and Chief Internal Auditor from 1996 to 1997; Deputy Controller from 1992 to 1996; and Director of Audit from 1989 to 1992. Before joining Fortune Brands, Mr. Omtvedt worked for Pillsbury Company in Minneapolis, Minnesota from 1985 to 1989 in various audit and controller roles. He is also a director of Oshkosh Corporation (NYSE: OSK), a Trustee of Lake Forest College and a National Trustee of Boys and Girls Clubs of America. Mr. Omtvedt has (i) extensive experience as a financial executive with broad knowledge of financial controls and systems; (ii) substantial leadership experience in domestic and international business; (iii) an extensive background in acquisitions and strategic alliances; (iv) experience with major sales channels (retailers and distributors); and (v) experience with compensation matters at public companies. Mr. Omtvedt’s extensive financial leadership experience in global, publicly traded companies, knowledge of audit practices, and proven expertise in acquisitions and strategic alliances and knowledge of compensation issues affecting public companies have made him a valuable member of the Board and Audit Committee and Chair of the Compensation Committee.

LOGO

Patrick M. Prevost

Age 59

Director since 2010

Member of the Audit

Committee and the Compensation Committee

Mr. Prevost has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Cabot Corporation (NYSE: CBT), a publicly traded global specialty chemicals company, since January 2008. Mr. Prevost served as President, Performance Chemicals at BASF AG, a publicly traded international chemical company, from October 2005 to December 2007. Prior to that, he was responsible for BASF Corporation’s Chemicals and Plastics business in North America. Mr. Prevost previously held senior management positions with increasing responsibility at BP Plc from 1999 to 2003 and Amoco Chemicals from 1983 until 1999.

Mr. Prevost has (i) substantial leadership experience in a variety of complex, international commodity driven businesses, which includes leadership positions that required living overseas; (ii) a chemical engineering background with broad experience in material science and chemistry, which are important to our wire and cable business; (iii) extensive experience involving acquisitions and strategic alliances; and (iv) experience in financial matters. Mr. Prevost brings to our Board demonstrated executive leadership expertise in commodity driven businesses and a keen understanding of the complexity of operating a global manufacturing organization.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS BELIEVES THAT THE ELECTION OF THESE DIRECTOR NOMINEES IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF OUR STOCKHOLDERS AND, ACCORDINGLY, RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our By-laws, Corporate Governance Principles and Guidelines (the “Governance Principles”), charters of our Board Committees, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (“Code of Ethics”), and Related Party Transactions Policy and Procedures are the framework for our corporate governance. They are designed to ensure that our Company complies with SEC rules and regulations and the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE, the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed. All of these corporate governance documents are available on our website www.generalcable.com via the Investor Relations page and are available in print to any stockholder on request to the Company’s Secretary at 4 Tesseneer Drive, Highland Heights, Kentucky 41076. Information on our website does not constitute a part of this Proxy Statement.

Corporate Governance Principles and Guidelines

Our Board has adopted a policy that describes our corporate governance practices. The objective of our Governance Principles is to provide guidance to ensure that our Board maintains its independence, objectivity, and effectiveness in fulfilling its responsibilities to our stockholders. The Governance Principles establish criteria and requirements for:

•

the requisite qualifications, selection process, and retention of directors;

•

the responsibilities of the directors; and

•

procedures and practices governing the operation and compensation of our Board.

Our Governance Principles also provide that directors must be willing to devote sufficient time to carry out their duties and responsibilities effectively, prepare for Board and Committee meetings by reviewing the materials provided to them in advance of the meeting, and should be committed to serve on the Board for an extended period of time. Directors should offer their resignation in the event of any significant change in their personal circumstances, including a change in their principal job responsibilities that would adversely affect their ability to fulfill their duties and responsibilities as directors. Further, directors who also serve as Chief Executive Officer or in equivalent positions should not serve on more than two boards of public companies in addition to our Board, and other directors should not serve on more than four other boards of public companies. In certain circumstances, the Board may determine that positions in excess of these limits may be maintained if doing so would not impair the director’s service on the Company’s Board. Lastly, our Governance Principles provide that arbitrary term limits on director’s service are not appropriate, nor should directors expect to be renominated annually until they reach retirement age. The Governance Principles further state that seventy (70) is an appropriate retirement age for non-employee directors. However, the Board will utilize its own self-evaluation process as an important determinant of Board tenure.

In addition to the above matters, our Governance Principles have a process whereby nominees must agree to tender their irrevocable resignations if they do not receive the required vote at the Annual Meeting at which they face re-election. Our Corporate Governance Committee (“Governance Committee”) reviews the circumstances surrounding the director nominee’s resignation and will submit such recommendation for prompt consideration to the Board. The Governance Committee and the Board may take into consideration any factors deemed relevant, including, without limitation, reported reasons for the “against” votes, the director’s length of service on the Board and contributions to General Cable in such role, and the effect of the director’s resignation on General Cable’s compliance with any law, rule, regulation, stock exchange listing standard, or contractual arrangement. After considering the Governance Committee’s recommendation, our Board will make a determination with respect to whether the director should continue to serve.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees. Our Code of Ethics defines our policies and expectations on various compliance topics, including conflicts of interest,

confidentiality, compliance with laws (including insider trading and anti-corruption laws), preservation and use of Company assets, proper accounting and financial integrity, and business ethics. It also sets forth the procedures for communicating and handling any potential violations. We intend to satisfy the SEC’s disclosure requirement regarding amendments to or waivers of our Code of Ethics by posting such information on our website at www.generalcable.com via our Investors Relations page.

Our Board and its Committees

The General Cable Board of Directors meets regularly during each year. In 2014, our Board held nine (9) meetings, including four (4) telephonic meetings. As a matter of policy, directors are expected to attend each annual meeting of stockholders and in 2014, all of the directors, except Mr. Hall who was not appointed until July, attended the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our Board size is currently set at seven members. The Board intends to increase the size of the Board to eight directors and has commenced a process to identify and appoint an additional operations-experienced independent director. The Company has engaged an executive search firm to assist in the process. With the exception of our Chief Executive Officer, all of our directors, including our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, are independent based on the application of the rules and standards of the NYSE and our Governance Principles. Consistent with NYSE standards, the Board has adopted guidelines for determining director independence. The guidelines can be found in our Governance Principles on our website www.generalcable.com via the Investor Relations page.

Private Sessions: At each regularly scheduled Board meeting, the non-employee directors meet without management present. The Non-Executive Chairman presides at such meetings. The non-employee directors also may and do meet without management present at other times as deemed necessary.

Our Committees: Our Board has three standing Committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance Committee.

During fiscal 2014, each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (1) the total number of meetings of the directors which were held during the period for which the director was a director, and (2) the total number of meetings held by any Committees of which the director was a member during the period that the director served. Each Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. All of the Committee charters are available on our website at www.generalcable.com via our Investors Relations page. All of our Committees have the authority to retain outside advisors to assist each Committee, respectively, in meeting their responsibilities, as necessary and appropriate, and to ensure that we provide funding to pay the fees and expenses of such advisors.

The membership, functions, and other relevant information relating to each Committee are described below.

2014 Committee Membership ⁽¹⁾


Non-Employee Directors ⁽²⁾	Audit Committee	Compensation Committee	Governance Committee
Sallie B. Bailey	X*		X
Edward Childs Hall, III			X
Gregory E. Lawton		X	X*
Craig P. Omtvedt	X	X*
Patrick M. Prevost	X	X
John E. Welsh, III			X

*	Chair of the Committee

⁽¹⁾	As of December 31, 2014

⁽²⁾	Only our non-employee directors serve as members of our Committees.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met nine (9) times in 2014, including five (5) telephonic meetings. Our Board of Directors has determined that all of our Audit Committee members are independent and financially literate under the rules of the SEC and NYSE and that Sallie B. Bailey and Craig P. Omtvedt each qualify as an audit committee financial expert under rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee assists the Board in the oversight of the (i) integrity of the Company’s financial statements; (ii) Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) independent auditor’s qualifications and independence; and (iv) performance of the Company’s internal audit functions and independent auditors. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are further described in the Audit Committee Charter which is available on our website at www.generalcable.com via our Investors Relations page.

The Audit Committee selects the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, reviews such firm’s procedures for ensuring their independence with respect to the services performed for the Company, approves all fees to be paid to the independent registered public accounting firm and preapproves the professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has adopted formal preapproval policies and procedures relating to the services provided by its independent auditor consistent with requirements of the SEC rules. Under the Company’s preapproval policy, all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors must be preapproved. The Audit Committee will generally preapprove a list of specific services and categories of services, including audit, audit-related, and other services, for the upcoming or current fiscal year. Any services that are not included in the approved list of services must be separately preapproved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee delegates to the Audit Committee Chair the authority to approve permitted audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor between Audit Committee meetings for the sake of efficiency. The Audit Committee Chair reports any such interim preapproval at the next meeting of the Audit Committee. In 2014, all audit and permissible non-audit services were preapproved in accordance with the policy.

The Audit Committee approved the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2015 and supports the Board’s recommendation to our stockholders for the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP’s appointment.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met four (4) times in 2014, including one (1) telephonic meeting. Our Board of Directors has determined that all of our Compensation Committee members are independent under the rules of the NYSE, qualify as “non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and qualify as “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee performs this function by: (i) evaluating the performance of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; (ii) reviewing and establishing the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; (iii) evaluating the Company’s executive compensation competitiveness and establishing the appropriate competitive positioning of the levels and mix of executive compensation elements; (iv) making recommendations to the Board with respect to the establishment of or changes to existing incentive and equity-based compensation plans of the Company; (v) administering the Company’s incentive and equity-based compensation plans; and (vi) reviewing potential risk to the Company from its compensation policies and practices for all employees, including incentive plans. In addition, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are further described in the Compensation Committee Charter which is available on our website at www.generalcable.com via our Investors Relations page. The Compensation Committee approved the appointment of Hay Group as its independent compensation consultant. Hay Group reports directly to the Compensation Committee.

Corporate Governance Committee. The Governance Committee met five (5) times in 2014, including one (1) telephonic meeting. Our Board of Directors has determined that all of our Governance Committee members are independent under the rules of the NYSE. The Governance Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in (i) evaluating and recommending nominees for election as directors; (ii) evaluating the membership and responsibilities of Board Committees; (iii) developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines and principles; (iv) devising and implementing a program or system to evaluate the performance of all directors and overseeing the annual evaluations of our Board; and (v) reviewing and advising the Board on executive officer succession plans. The responsibilities of the Governance Committee are further described in the Governance Committee Charter which is available on our website at www.generalcable.com via our Investors Relations page.

Director Qualifications

As described above, the Governance Committee is responsible for considering and recommending nominees for election as directors of General Cable. In carrying out this duty, our Governance Committee from time to time engages third-party search firms to assist in identifying and assessing qualifications of individual director candidates. Directors’ general qualifications and responsibilities are set out in our Governance Principles. Pursuant to our Governance Principles, our Governance Committee seeks director candidates who encompass a diverse range of experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills in order to provide sound and prudent guidance on the Company’s operations and interests worldwide. We aim to have a Board that is diverse and represents experience in business, finance, technology, global markets, and other disciplines relevant to the scope of the Company’s activities over time. The Governance Committee further expects that directors should possess the highest personal and professional values, ethics and integrity, and should be committed to represent and advance the long-term interests of our stockholders. In considering the nature and scope of experience encompassed by the directors or nominees for director, our Board evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, taking into account relevant factors such as independence, gender and ethnic diversity, personal skills, and industry background. In searching for candidates to fill Board vacancies, our Governance Committee is committed to identifying the most capable candidates who have experience in the areas of expertise needed at that time and meet our criteria for nomination. Our Governance Committee has and will continue to take reasonable steps to ensure that women and minority candidates are considered as part of every director search.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors’ current leadership structure consists of a Non-Executive Chairman appointed annually separate from the Chief Executive Officer. Our current Board Chairman is John E. Welsh, III and our President and Chief Executive Officer is Gregory B. Kenny. The duties of our Chairman include:

•

presiding at meetings of stockholders and the Board;

•

leading the Board in deliberations, including at non-employee director sessions;

•

appointing Committee Chairs for Board Committees;

•

acting as a liaison between our Board and the Chief Executive Officer; and

•

providing strategic guidance and counsel relating to our business, management, and personnel development.

This leadership structure has been in place since 2001, when Mr. G. Kenny was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer. We believe that having an independent director leading our Board, whether as a Non-Executive Chairman or as the Lead Independent Director, contributes to a more independent Board in the long-term and leads to more productive internal Board dynamics between and among directors and committees. Independent Board leadership also allows our Chief Executive Officer more time to concentrate on significant business issues and is well suited to our wire and cable business with its extended business cycles.

On October 29, 2014, we announced that Mr. G. Kenny will transition out of his role as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. See “Executive Compensation: Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Changes in Executive Officers.”

Director Nomination Process

Each year, the Governance Committee recommends a slate of nominees to the Board, which proposes nominees to the stockholders for election to the Board. In connection with its recommendations, the Governance Committee considers whether the director candidates have the requisite qualifications and skills that are identified above and the commitment and willingness to serve on the Board in accord with our Governance Principles.

The Governance Committee will consider stockholder suggestions for nominees when submitted in accordance with the provisions of our By-laws. Pursuant to our By-laws, stockholders may present any proposals for stockholder vote, including the election of directors, by following the advance notice procedure described below. Under this procedure, the candidates eligible for election at a meeting of stockholders will be candidates nominated by or at the direction of the Board of Directors and candidates nominated at the meeting by a stockholder. Stockholders will be given a reasonable opportunity at the Annual Meeting to nominate candidates for the office of Director if, as the By-laws require, the nominating stockholder first gave the Company’s Secretary a written nomination notice at least sixty (60) days before the date of the annual meeting.

The nomination notice must set forth the following information as to each individual nominated:

•

The name, date of birth, business address, and residence address of the individual;

•

The business experience during the past five (5) years of the nominee, including his or her principal occupations and employment during such period, the name and principal business of any corporation or other organization in which those occupations and employment were carried on, and additional information about the nature of his or her responsibilities and level of professional competence which permits an assessment of the candidate’s prior experience;

•

A description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary and non-monetary agreements, arrangements, and understandings during the past three (3) years, and any other material relationships, between or among the stockholder submitting the nomination notice and any associated person acting in concert with such person, on the one hand, and each proposed nominee and any associated person acting in concert with such nominee, on the other hand, including, without limitation, all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 promulgated under Regulation S-K if the nominating stockholder and any beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is made, if any, or any associated person acting in concert therewith, were the “registrant” for purposes of such Item and the nominee were a director or executive officer of such registrant;

•

Whether the nominee is or has ever been at any time a director, officer, or owner of five (5) percent or more of any class of capital stock, partnership interests, or other equity interest of any corporation, partnership, or other entity;

•

Any directorships held by the nominee in any company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or covered by Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended;

•

Whether, in the last five (5) years, the nominee was convicted in a criminal proceeding or has been subject to a judgment, order, finding, or decree of any federal, state or other governmental entity concerning any violation of federal, state, or other law, or any proceeding in bankruptcy, which conviction, order, finding, decree, or proceeding may be material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity of the nominee;

•

Whether, if elected, the nominee intends to tender, promptly following such nominee’s failure to receive the required vote for election or reelection at the next meeting at which such nominee would face election or reelection, an irrevocable resignation effective upon acceptance of such resignation by the Board, in accordance with the Governance Principles; and

•

Any other information relating to individual nominated that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors in a contested election pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The nomination notice must also provide the following information about the nominating stockholder and any associated person acting in concert with the nominating stockholder: (i) the name and business address of the nominating stockholder(s) and any associated person(s); (ii) the name and address of the nominating stockholder(s) and of any associated person(s) as appearing in the Company’s books; (iii) the class and number of the Company’s shares that are beneficially owned by the nominating stockholder(s) and any associated person(s); and (iv) certain other information about the interests of the nominating stockholder(s) and any associated person(s) in the Company’s securities, including the following:

•

Any derivative instrument directly or indirectly owned beneficially by the nominating stockholder(s) and any associated person(s) and any other direct or indirect opportunity to profit or share in any profit derived from any increase or decrease in the value of shares of stock of the Company;

•

Any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship pursuant to which the nominating stockholder(s) and any associated person(s) have a right to vote any shares of any security of the Company;

•

Any short interest in any security of the Company;

•

Any rights to dividends on the shares of stock of the Company owned beneficially by the nominating stockholder(s) and by any associated person(s) that are separated or separable from the underlying shares of stock of the Company;

•

Any proportionate interest in shares of stock of the Company or derivative instruments held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which the nominating stockholder(s) or any associated person(s) is a general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner; and

•

Any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) to which the nominating stockholder(s) or any associated person(s) is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of shares of stock of the Company or derivative instruments, if any, as of the date of such notice, including without limitation, any such interests held by members of the immediate family of the nominating stockholder(s) or any associated person(s) sharing the same household (which information shall be supplemented as would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitation of proxies for, as applicable, the proposal and/or for the election of directors in a contested election pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder).

The nomination notice must include the nominee’s signed written consent to being named in a proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. A written update of the information provided in the notice must be provided to the Company ten (10) business days prior to the meeting. If the presiding officer at any stockholder’s meeting determines that a nomination was not made in accordance with these procedures, he or she will so declare at the meeting and the defective nomination will be disregarded.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Our executive officers with the leadership of our Chief Executive Officer are responsible for overall risk management of our Company. The oversight of risk affecting our Company from major to minor and emerging

risks is carried out by our Board, as a whole, within the existing leadership structure with the assistance of its standing Committees. Our Board fulfills its risk oversight responsibilities by (i) understanding our Company’s risk philosophy and approving our risk tolerance; (ii) knowing the established effective risk management processes that identify, assess, and manage our most significant enterprise-wide risks; (iii) reviewing our risk portfolio in relation to the agreed risk tolerance, including through strategic and operational initiatives that integrate enterprise-wide risk exposures; and (iv) regularly being apprised of the most significant risks and management’s response. Important elements in the assessment of risk include reports to the Board and its Committees from the Company’s global Operating Committee and operating regions on a regular basis, the output and actions of the Audit Committee, as well as reports to the Board from the Chief Executive Officer and the functional managers who deal with various specific elements of risk such as the global insurance program. By using a broad approach, the Board believes that it is able to discharge its oversight role and address the major, minor, and emerging risks facing our businesses both in the short and long-term.

Stockholder Communication with our Board of Directors

Our Board has adopted the following procedures for our stockholders and all other interested persons to communicate with our Board, as a whole, and individual directors on matters of interest. Communications to our directors will initially be reviewed by the Secretary and routed to the Chairman or a Board Committee, as appropriate. Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board, our Non-Executive Chairman, an individual director, the non-employee directors, as a group, or a specific Committee of the Board using the following:


Mail		Telephone
Board of Directors		(800) 716-3565
General Cable Corporation
Attention: Secretary		Email
4 Tesseneer Drive		Chairman of the Board – Chairman@generalcable.com
Highland Heights, Kentucky 41076		Non-employee directors – Directors@generalcable.com

Any general information requests can be made using our main telephone number (859) 572-8000 or main email address info@generalcable.com.

Transactions with Related Persons

The Company has adopted written policies and procedures for the review and approval of any related party transactions that meet the minimum threshold for disclosure in the proxy statement under the applicable SEC rules (generally, transactions involving amounts exceeding $120,000 in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest). The Company has not entered into any transactions, other than the transaction disclosed below, since the beginning of its last fiscal year with any related person.

Under our current policies and procedures, related parties are expected to seek Audit Committee approval of related party transactions before the transaction is entered into or amended. The Audit Committee may ratify a transaction after it has been entered into, in which case the transaction will be evaluated on the same standards as a transaction being preapproved. In certain circumstances, the Audit Committee Chair may act on behalf of the Audit Committee. The policy specifically requires approval or ratification if the Company hires a family member of a director (including a director nominee), executive officer, or significant stockholder for total compensation in excess of $120,000 or, after initial approval of the hire, makes any material changes to an employment arrangement.

When seeking approval, the related party will provide the Company’s General Counsel with information about the transaction for the General Counsel’s evaluation and submission to the Audit Committee. The evaluation information includes:

•

the related person’s relationship to the Company and interest in the transaction;

•

material facts of the proposed transaction, including the proposed aggregate value of the transaction;

•

benefits to the Company of the proposed transaction;

•

availability of other sources of comparable products or services;

•

an assessment of whether the proposed transaction is on terms that are comparable to terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally; and

•

any effect on a director’s independence if the transaction involves a director.

After considering the evaluation information, the Audit Committee will approve or ratify only those transactions that are not opposed to the interests of the Company and that are on terms that are fair to the Company. The Audit Committee may make its approval conditional upon revisions to the terms of the transaction.

Transactions Reviewed by the Audit Committee: On February 25, 2010, and July 1, 2010, the Company awarded 7,000 and 37,281 RSUs respectively (the “2010 Grants”), to Emmanuel Sabonnadiere, who was, at the time, a resident of France. Mr. Sabonnadiere served as our Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Mediterranean from July 2010 through July 2014 and transitioned from the Company effective as of August 1, 2014. Under the applicable restricted stock unit agreements, the RSUs were payable in shares of Company common stock on the basis of one share per one RSU. In order to provide the Company with certain tax advantages under French law, the RSU agreements provided that, following the vesting of the 2010 Grants on the third anniversary of the date of grant, the shares issued upon vesting were subject to a two year holding period. Subsequent to the 2010 Grants, Mr. Sabonnadiere relocated to Spain and, due to the deemed effect of the vesting of the 2010 grants on Mr. Sabonnadiere’s total compensation, Mr. Sabonnadiere became subject to Spanish taxation with respect to the 2010 Grants, which applied at the time of vesting rather than following the post-vesting holding period, as was the case under French law (Mr. Sabonnadiere also remained subject to French taxes with regard to the 2010 grants). On January 20, 2014, in accordance with its statutory obligations under Spanish tax laws, Grupo General Cable Sistemas, S.L., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, paid to Spanish tax authorities 295,754 Euros (approximately $400,451 on the date of payment) as withholding tax for compensation earned by Mr. Sabonnadiere, including compensation deemed to be earned by Mr. Sabonnadiere upon the vesting of the 2010 Grants. The RSU agreements related to the 2010 Grants required Mr. Sabonnadiere to reimburse the Company for the payment of the withholding taxes paid by the Company or its subsidiaries with respect to the RSUs. In addition, Company policy requires that the Company receive, contemporaneously with its payment of withholding tax on behalf of an executive officer, reimbursement by the executive officer. In order to preserve for the Company certain tax benefits under French tax law, the RSU agreements for Mr. Sabonnadiere, unlike RSU agreements applicable to other executive officers of the Company, did not provide the Company with the ability to withhold shares issuable to Mr. Sabonnadiere in satisfaction of his reimbursement obligation. On January 31, 2014, Mr. Sabonnadiere reimbursed Grupo General Cable Sistemas, S.L. in cash the amount that it had paid in withholding taxes.

In response to this situation, Company management undertook efforts to re-educate its executive officers (including Mr. Sabonnadiere) and regional legal counsel regarding the requirement of contemporaneous reimbursement by executive officers of withholding taxes and the Company’s Related Party Transactions Policy and Procedures. Company management also reviewed the eleven day delay in the reimbursement with both the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. The Audit Committee determined that Mr. Sabonnadiere’s delay in reimbursing the Company, in accordance with the terms of the RSU agreements and the Company’s reimbursement policy for executive officers, and his delay in seeking the approval of the Company’s Audit

Committee, in accordance with the Company’s policy of requiring advance Audit Committee review and approval of related party transactions was due to the unanticipated application of Spanish tax laws, coupled with a misunderstanding that the Spanish employee withholding policy, which permitted reimbursement through payroll deduction of direct periodic payments, was superseded by the Company policy requiring contemporaneous reimbursement by executive officers. As a result of the unique circumstances surrounding this matter, management’s re-education efforts and the actions of the Compensation Committee described below, the Audit Committee determined that no further action need be taken at the time. In addition, the Compensation Committee approved (i) amendments to the July 1, 2010 restricted stock unit agreement with Mr. Sabonnadiere to remove the two year restriction on selling vested shares of the common stock following vesting; and (ii) new global restricted stock award agreements, to be used in connection with future awards for our executive officers, that permit, at the Company’s discretion, the withholding of shares to reimburse the Company for any tax withholding payments made by the Company on behalf of the executive officer.

REPORT OF OUR AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s overall financial reporting process. In fulfilling its responsibilities for the fiscal year end 2014, the Audit Committee:

•

reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte & Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates (together, “Deloitte”), the Company’s independent auditors;

•

discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, as amended or modified, relating to the conduct of the audit;

•

received written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte, required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte its independence;

•

evaluated and discussed Deloitte’s internal quality control procedures and other matters, as required by the NYSE listing requirements; and

•

exercised oversight in other areas relating to the financial reporting and audit process that the Audit Committee determined appropriate, including the Company’s compliance program, relating to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the Company’s risk assessment and risk management programs.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review of the audited financial statements and discussions with management and Deloitte as discussed above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee

Sallie B. Bailey, Chair

Craig P. Omtvedt

Patrick M. Prevost

The information above in the Report of our Audit Committee shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that our Company specifically requests that the information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates the information by reference.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section appearing in this Proxy Statement with the Company’s management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be incorporated by reference into General Cable’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and included in this Proxy Statement.

The information above in the Report of our Compensation Committee shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that our Company specifically requests that the information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates the information by reference.

Compensation Committee

Craig P. Omtvedt, Chair

Gregory E. Lawton

Patrick M. Prevost

OTHER COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MATTERS

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee consisted of Craig P. Omtvedt, Gregory E. Lawton, Patrick M. Prevost and Robert L. Smialek (who retired from the Board at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders). No person who served as a member of the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2014 was a current or former officer or employee of the Company, or engaged in certain transactions with us required to be disclosed as “related person transactions” under regulations of the SEC. There were no compensation committee “interlocks” during fiscal 2014, which generally means that none of our executive officers served as a director or member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a member of the Board or as a member of the Compensation Committee.

Risk-Related Compensation Policies and Practices

In connection with the annual compensation review by our management and Compensation Committee, management and the Compensation Committee evaluated our current compensation policies and practices to determine whether any of our compensation plans are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. Our Compensation Committee sought counsel from management, compensation experts, and legal counsel in making its risk determination. The evaluation process included a discussion of the Company’s compensation philosophy and structure of our compensation plans, an analysis of the factors and processes used by our Compensation Committee in evaluating performance under each plan, and a review of our internal controls. Based on its evaluation, our Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation policies and practices for all employees do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SHARES

The following table sets forth information, as of March 16, 2015, concerning the beneficial ownership of General Cable common stock by: (i) each current director and director nominee; (ii) each of our named executive officers; and (iii) all current directors and executive officers as a group.

Whenever we refer in this Proxy Statement to the “named executive officers,” we are referring to those executive officers that we identified in the Summary Compensation Table on page 53.


Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership ^{(1),(2),(3),(4)}		Percent of Class ⁽⁵⁾
Non-Employee Directors
Sallie B. Bailey		5,060		*
Edward Childs Hall, III		8,990		*
Gregory E. Lawton		48,171		*
Craig P. Omtvedt		42,988		*
Patrick M. Prevost		13,860		*
John E. Welsh, III		153,092		*
Named Executive Officers
Peter A. Campbell		7,286		*
Gregory B. Kenny		1,332,567		2.7	%
Robert D. Kenny		13,262		*
Gregory J. Lampert		337,313		*
Brian J. Robinson ⁽⁶⁾		251,999		*
Emmanuel Sabonnadiere		10,587		*
Robert J. Siverd		304,794		*
All other executive officers as a group		21,901		*
*All Current Directors and Executive Officers, as a Group*		2,236,489		4.4	%

⁽¹⁾	Beneficial ownership is determined under SEC rules and includes voting or investment power with respect to the shares.

The amounts in the table above do not include the following interests in our common stock, which interests do not confer voting or investment power:

•

shares of common stock underlying options which are not currently exercisable or not exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2015, as follows: 52,667 options for Mr. G. Kenny; 20,000 options for Mr. Lampert; 20,000 options for Mr. Robinson; and 5,000 options for the other executive officers as a group;

•

shares of common stock underlying RSUs which have not vested as of March 16, 2015 and will not vest within 60 days of March 16, 2015, as follows: 1,900 RSUs for Ms. Bailey; 3,800 RSUs for Mr. Lawton; 3,800 RSUs for Mr. Omtvedt; 3,800 RSUs for Mr. Prevost; 6,600 RSUs for Mr. Welsh; 34,924 RSUs for Mr. Campbell; 205,424 RSUs for Mr. G. Kenny; 31,116 RSUs for Mr. R. Kenny; 74,750 RSUs for Mr. Lampert; 93,750 RSUs for Mr. Robinson; 2,262 RSUs for Mr. Siverd and 60,599 RSUs for the other executive officers as a group; and

•

shares of common stock underlying PSUs (at target) which have not vested as of March 16, 2015 and will not vest within 60 days of March 16, 2015, as follows: 12,860 PSUs for Mr. Campbell; 157,860 PSUs for Mr. G. Kenny; 25,120 PSUs for Mr. R. Kenny; 61,040 PSUs for Mr. Lampert; 61,040 PSUs for Mr. Robinson; 2,715 PSUs for Mr. Siverd and 40,140 PSUs for the other executive officers as a group.

⁽²⁾	Includes shares that could be acquired by the exercise of stock options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2015, as follows: 2,500 shares for Mr. Lawton; 5,000 shares for

Mr. Omtvedt; 10,000 shares for Mr. Welsh; 799,514 shares for Mr. G. Kenny; 3,100 shares for Mr. R. Kenny; 239,764 shares for Mr. Lampert; 235,195 shares for Mr. Robinson; 170,716 shares for Mr. Siverd; and 10,000 shares for the other executive officers as a group.

⁽³⁾

Includes shares allocated to the beneficial owner’s account in the General Cable Retirement Plans as follows: 26,704.17 shares for Mr. G. Kenny; 37,660.32 shares for Mr. Lampert; and 1,191.76 shares for the other executive officers as a group. Shares allocated to a participant’s account in the General Cable Retirement Plans will be voted by the trustee in accordance with the participant’s instructions. If the trustee does not receive instructions as to the voting of particular shares, the trustee will vote such shares in the same proportion to instructions actually received from other participants in the General Cable Retirement Plans.

⁽⁴⁾

Includes: (a) deferred shares allocated to the participant’s DCP account on a notional basis as follows: 27,411 shares for Mr. Lawton; 11,061 shares for Mr. Omtvedt; 13,860 shares for Mr. Prevost; 88,794 shares for Mr. Welsh; and 340,495 shares for Mr. G. Kenny; and (b) shares held by the General Cable stock fund in the “rabbi trust” that are allocated to a participant’s DCP account on a notional basis as phantom stock units as follows: 2,998.11 phantom stock units for Mr. Welsh; 68,411.53 phantom stock units for Mr. G. Kenny; 12,595.72 phantom stock units for Mr. G. Lampert; and 3.32 phantom stock units for the other executive officers as a group. Deferred shares allocated to a participant’s DCP account on a notional basis will be voted by the trustee in accordance with the participant’s instructions. If the trustee does not receive instructions as to the voting of particular deferred shares, the trustee will vote such shares as instructed by the Company. In addition, shares held by the General Cable stock fund in the “rabbi trust” that are allocated to a participant’s DCP account on a notional basis as phantom stock units, will also be voted by the trustee in accordance with the participant’s instructions. If the trustee does not receive instructions as to the voting of particular shares, the trustee will vote such shares as instructed by the Company.

⁽⁵⁾

The percentages shown are calculated based on the total outstanding shares on March 16, 2015 of 49,037,315. The * symbol means less than 1 percent. Percentage calculations assume, for each person and for each group, that all shares that may be acquired by such person or by such group pursuant to stock options currently exercisable or that become exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2015 are outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of common stock owned by such person or by such group. However, those unissued shares of our common stock described above are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage of common stock beneficially owned by any other person.

⁽⁶⁾	Includes 300 shares held in a custodial account for Mr. Robinson’s children.

SIGNIFICANT STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information about each person known to General Cable to be the beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of General Cable’s common stock as of December 31, 2014. We obtained this information from records and statements filed with the SEC under Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Exchange Act.


Name and Business Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership ⁽¹⁾		Percent of Class ⁽²⁾
AllianceBernstein LP⁽³⁾ 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10105		3,429,046		7.0	%

BlackRock, Inc. ⁽⁴⁾ 55 East 52nd Street New York, New York 10022		4,405,034		9.0	%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP ⁽⁵⁾ Building One 6300 Bee Cave Road Austin, Texas 78746		3,176,081		6.5	%

OppenheimerFunds, Inc. ⁽⁶⁾ Two World Financial Center 225 Liberty Street New York, NY 10281		3,331,111		6.8	%

Pzena Investment Management, LLC ⁽⁷⁾ 120 West 45th Street, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10036		2,662,468		5.4	%

The Vanguard Group ⁽⁸⁾ 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355		2,790,123		5.7	%

⁽¹⁾	Beneficial ownership is determined under SEC rules and includes voting or investment power with respect to the shares.

⁽²⁾	The percentages shown are calculated based on the total outstanding shares on March 16, 2015 of 49,037,315.

⁽³⁾	Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2015 by AllianceBernstein LP (“Alliance”). Of the shares listed, Alliance has sole power to vote 3,074,596 shares of General Cable common stock and sole dispositive power over 3,429,046 shares of General Cable common stock.

⁽⁴⁾	Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 15, 2015 by Blackrock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). Of the shares listed, BlackRock has sole power to vote 4,183,937 shares of General Cable common stock and sole dispositive power over 4,405,034 shares of General Cable common stock.

⁽⁵⁾

Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2015 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional”). Of the shares listed, Dimensional has sole power to vote 3,084,459 shares of General Cable common stock and sole dispositive power over 3,176,081 shares of General Cable common stock.

⁽⁶⁾

Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 27, 2015 by OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OppenheimerFunds”) and Oppenheimer Equity Income Fund (“Oppenheimer Equity”). Of the shares listed, OppenheimerFunds has shared power to vote, and shared dispositive power over, 3,331,111 shares of General Cable common stock. Oppenheimer Equity has shared power to vote, and shared dispositive power over, 2,854,981 shares of General Cable common stock. The 2,854,981 shares over which Oppenheimer Equity has shared voting and dispositive power are included in the 3,331,111 shares over which OppenheimerFunds has shared voting and dispositive power. The address of Oppenheimer Equity is 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, CO 80112.

⁽⁷⁾	Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 29, 2015 by Pzena Investment Management, LLC (“Pzena”). Of the shares listed, Pzena has sole power to vote 2,330,468 shares of General Cable common stock and sole dispositive power over 2,662,468 shares of General Cable common stock.

⁽⁸⁾

Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2015 by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”). Of the shares listed, Vanguard has sole power to vote 66,582 shares of General Cable common stock, sole dispositive power over 2,727,941 shares of General Cable common stock, and shared dispositive power over 62,182 shares of General Cable common stock.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our Compensation Committee annually reviews and establishes the compensation of our non-employee directors and makes a recommendation to our Board for final approval. Our director compensation program is designed to compensate our non-employee directors for their service to our Company and the level of responsibility they have assumed in today’s corporate governance environment.

Our Board of Directors, in conjunction with our Compensation Committee, retains the services of our independent compensation consultant to review our non-employee director compensation program in comparison with market data on a bi-annual basis. Hay Group reviewed the compensation of our directors in December 2013. As a result of that review and the Compensation Committee’s discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that for 2014 the amount of the annual retainer be increased by $5,000, the value of the annual equity award be increased by $25,000 and the form of the directors’ annual equity award be changed from an RSU which cliff-vests at the end of three years to a stock award which is vested immediately upon grant following the annual meeting of stockholders and which may be deferred at the election of the director.

Our non-employee director compensation program in 2014 included the following components:

•

An annual retainer of $90,000;

•

An additional annual retainer for the Chairman of $85,000;

•

Cash retainers for service as a Committee Chair as follows:


Position	Annual Retainer ($)
Chair of Audit Committee		15,000
Chair of Compensation Committee		10,000
Chair of Governance Committee		10,000

•

A stock award with a grant date value of approximately $200,000 for the Chairman and $125,000 for our other non-employee directors. Such stock award was vested immediately upon grant following the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders.

Non-employee directors are reimbursed for related out-of-pocket expenses for attendance at Board and Committee meetings. In order to be eligible to receive the retainer, a director must have attended at least 75 percent of the Board meetings in the prior year, unless attendance was excused by the Chairman.

Our directors are covered by our Stock Ownership Guidelines (“Guidelines”) adopted in March 2005 and amended by our Board on December 14, 2010. Under the approved Guidelines, non-employee directors are required to obtain ownership of common stock equal to five (5) times the amount of the annual cash retainer paid to non-employee directors for their service as directors within five (5) years from their date of appointment. Each of our current non-employee directors who has been a Board member for at least five years was in compliance with these Guidelines as of December 31, 2014.

Our non-employee directors may also defer any portion of their annual retainers and equity awards into the General Cable Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, which was adopted in 1996 (the “DCP”). The DCP permits our non-employee directors to elect to defer all or a portion of their annual retainers and equity awards into the DCP on an annual basis before the beginning of each plan year. Deferrals must remain in the DCP until the director retires or no longer serves on our Board. Cash retainers deferred and dividends paid on deferred shares of stock may be invested in any of the investment vehicles provided under the DCP. Deferred shares of stock representing director fees may not be reinvested into other vehicles, but must remain in the DCP on a notional basis as whole shares and will be distributed as shares in accordance with distribution elections made by each participant. The DCP assets are held in a “rabbi trust,” and as such, are subject to the claims of general creditors of the Company. Operation of the DCP and distributions are also subject to Section 409A of the Code, which imposes procedural (including timing) restrictions on the DCP and on any future changes in distribution elections.

Director Compensation Table


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) ⁽¹⁾		Stock Awards ($) ⁽²⁾		Total ($)
Sallie B. Bailey		97,500		121,187		218,687
Edward Childs Hall, III ⁽³⁾		45,000		85,785		130,785
Gregory E. Lawton		100,000		121,187		221,187
Craig P. Omtvedt		102,500		121,187		223,687
Patrick M. Prevost		90,000		121,187		211,187
Robert L. Smialek ⁽⁴⁾		50,000		—		50,000
John E. Welsh, III		175,000		193,995		368,995

⁽¹⁾

Each non-employee director received an annual retainer of $90,000. The Chair of our Audit Committee received an additional annual retainer of $15,000 and the Chairs of our Compensation Committee and Governance Committee received an additional annual retainer of $10,000. In his capacity as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Welsh received an additional annual retainer of $85,000 during 2014.

⁽²⁾

Represents the grant date fair value of the equity granted to the non-employee directors as determined under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“Topic 718”) using assumptions set forth in the footnotes of the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for calendar year 2014. Mr. Prevost deferred his 2014 equity grant into our DCP.

⁽³⁾	Mr. Hall was appointed to serve as a director on July 28, 2014 and only received a portion of his annual retainer.

⁽⁴⁾	Mr. Smialek retired from our Board of Directors on May 15, 2014 and only received a portion of his annual retainer.

Director’s Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2014

The following table presents the outstanding stock options and RSUs held by each of our non-employee directors as of December 31, 2014.


	OPTION AWARDS									STOCK AWARDS
Name	Options Grant Date		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Shares and Units Grant Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) ⁽¹⁾		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) ⁽²⁾
S. Bailey				—	—						7/31/2013		1,900	$	28,310
E. Hall				—	—								—		—
G. Lawton		2/14/2007		2,500	—		50.68		2/14/2017		2/9/2012		4,200	$	62,580
											2/26/2013		3,800	$	56,620
C. Omtvedt		1/26/2005		2,500	—		11.94		1/26/2015		2/9/2012		4,200	$	62,580
		2/7/2006		2,500	—		22.97		2/7/2016		2/26/2013		3,800	$	56,620
		2/14/2007		2,500	—		50.68		2/14/2017
P. Prevost				—	—						2/9/2012		4,200	$	62,580
											2/26/2013		3,800	$	56,620
R. Smialek ⁽³⁾		2/7/2006		2,500	—		22.97		2/7/2016				—		—
		2/14/2007		2,500	—		50.68		2/14/2017
J. Welsh		2/7/2006		5,000	—		22.97		2/7/2016		2/9/2012		7,350	$	109,515
		2/14/2007		5,000	—		50.68		2/14/2017		2/26/2013		6,600	$	98,340

⁽¹⁾	The RSUs vest at the end of three (3) years from the date of grant and our non-employee directors will be entitled to receive one share of common stock for each RSU.

⁽²⁾	The market value of the RSUs is based on the closing price of General Cable common stock on December 31, 2014 of $14.90.

⁽³⁾	Mr. Smialek retired from our Board of Directors on May 15, 2014. Retiring non-employee directors may exercise vested options until the earlier of (a) three years from the date of retirement or (b) the original expiration date.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

The following is a brief overview of the more detailed discussion and analysis set forth in this section, which focuses on compensation paid to our named executive officers in 2014. Whenever we refer in this Proxy Statement to the “named executive officers”, we are referring to those executive officers that we identified in the Summary Compensation Table on page 53.

Compensation Philosophy

At General Cable, our philosophy on executive compensation is to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders by incentivizing them to deliver sustainable, long-term stockholder value. We have designed a compensation program that makes a substantial percentage of executive pay variable. In recent years, we have continued to adjust our compensation program to further align compensation received by our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and to provide compensation that is tied directly to performance. In setting annual compensation for our named executive officers, our Compensation Committee considers the following implementation principles that are governed by our executive compensation philosophy:

•

Executive compensation should be comprised of a mix between fixed salary and variable opportunities and reflect both external competitiveness and internal equity;

•

Fixed compensation should be targeted at a market competitive rate (i.e., +/- 15% of market median), which is determined by reference to our comparator peer group and compensation survey data;

•

Cash incentives should include both “stretch” targets that emphasize strong financial performance from operations and strategic measures designed to create and sustain long-term success of the business;

•

Variable compensation should be comprised of both cash and long-term equity incentives and provide opportunities for our executives to earn above market median rewards for outstanding performance; and

•

Actual compensation should be dependent upon many factors, including, but not limited to, our financial results, the executive’s level of responsibilities, growth potential, performance, tenure, and internal equity.

2014 Results

The wire and cable industry is competitive, mature and cost driven with minimal differentiation for many product offerings among industry participants from a manufacturing or technology standpoint. Overall, global wire and cable demand was below historical “norms” in 2014. We experienced uneven demand during 2014 throughout Asia Pacific, Africa and Latin America as a result of weak construction and electrical infrastructure investment resulting from slow global economic recovery. Despite these trends, we experienced stabilizing demand in certain key end markets. In 2014, North America was a source of relative strength as the impact of stable demand across the portfolio was buoyed by the performance of our specialty cables businesses. Further in North America, we continued to benefit from our leading market positions, economies of scales, breadth of products and long-standing customer relationships. Also in Europe, adjusted results improved principally due to the strength and continued execution of our submarine turnkey project business which achieved significant project milestones during 2014. Overall, our performance on a consolidated basis lagged management’s expectation in 2014 despite being somewhat mixed regionally.

As a result, we announced two strategic initiatives in 2014 focused on enhancing our performance, including the following:

•

Divestiture Program: In October 2014, the Board of Directors, after an extensive review of our strategic alternatives and operational structure, took action by authorizing a plan to exit all of our operations in

Asia Pacific and Africa in order to simplify our geographic portfolio and reduce organizational complexity. The Company plans to continue to sell principally specialized and higher value add products into these markets on an export basis as well as service its international customers from its core operations in North America, Latin America and Europe. In December, we completed the first transaction under this program with the sale of our interest in the Philippines for cash of $67 million, a significant first step.

•

Restructuring Program: In July 2014, we announced that we were implementing a restructuring program. The restructuring program is expected to generate approximately $75 million of ongoing annual savings. The restructuring program is focused on the closure of certain underperforming assets as well as the consolidation and realignment of other facilities principally in North America, Latin America and Europe. We are also implementing reductions in SG&A expenses. The total pre-tax charges of the program are estimated to be in the range of $200 million, which includes approximately $80 million of cash costs.

We believe these strategic actions will better position us to benefit from future energy, infrastructure and construction investment in our core strategic markets in North America, Latin America and Europe. On a parallel path, significant focus was given to building processes, infrastructure, strengthening internal controls, enhancing leadership teams, upgrading talent base and reinforcing our “One Company” value-based performance driven culture.

Despite these challenges, we ended 2014 on a positive note as we generated strong cash flow and liquidity while reducing debt. The liquidity position is strong with $425 million of availability under our North American and European based credit facility and more than $120 million of availability throughout Latin America (excluding Venezuela) including cash and various working capital lines. We also applied the cash proceeds from the sale of the Philippines toward the reduction of debt, a key priority for us. We are well positioned to fund the business including working capital requirements, restructuring activities, quarterly dividends and the retirement of the $125 million senior floating rate notes due in April 2015 with the achievement of our cash flow and inventory reduction targets in 2014.

2014 Compensation Committee Actions

For 2014, the Compensation Committee approved the following changes to our executive compensation program:

•

changed the secondary financial performance metrics for the AIP to adjusted EBITDA and cash conversion cycle days;

•

added a regional performance component to the performance metrics and created different performance weightings for corporate and regional executives;

•

replaced option awards with awards of PSUs; and

•

issued an even mix of PSU awards and RSU awards.

Our Compensation Committee made these changes as it believes they are consistent with our compensation philosophy, pay for performance environment and market trends.

Components of Our Compensation

Consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, our executive compensation program includes both fixed and variable components. The fixed compensation components, which consist of base salary and benefits, are designed to attract and retain executive talent. The variable compensation components, which consist of an

annual cash bonus opportunity and long-term equity incentives, depend upon both our Company’s and the individual’s performance, thus aligning the executive’s interests with those of our stockholders. Individual compensation and the mix of base salary, annual cash bonus opportunity, and long-term incentive opportunities vary depending on the executive’s level of responsibilities, growth potential, performance, tenure with our Company, and internal pay equity. However, the at-risk portion of an executive’s compensation generally increases as such executive’s level of responsibilities increases. The main elements of our 2014 named executive officer compensation program are outlined in the table below.


	Compensation Element	Purpose
Annual Cash Compensation	Base Salary	Represents pay for an individual’s primary duties and responsibilities. Base salaries are reviewed annually and are established based on scope of responsibility, individual performance, potential, and competitiveness versus the relevant external market and our operating performance.
Annual Cash Compensation	Annual Incentives	Provides a performance-based cash incentive opportunity. Rewards achievement of specific financial and strategic measures, including consolidated and business team results and individual performance. The amount actually earned will vary relative to the targeted level based on our actual results and the individual’s performance.
Long-Term, Equity-Based Compensation	Restricted Stock Units	Provides performance-based awards under a plan designed to enhance executive stock ownership, as well as an incentive for retention and sustaining stockholder value. Value of awards is directly dependent on our stock price and our performance.
Long-Term, Equity-Based Compensation	Performance Stock Units	Provides a performance-based equity incentive opportunity. Rewards achievement of financial measures, as well as supporting retention and aligning pay with performance. Value of awards will vary depending on our actual results.
Benefits and Retirement	U.S. Retirement Benefits and Deferred Compensation	Provides benefits to our U.S.-based executive officers at retirement from our Company. Our core plan is a defined contribution retirement and savings plan, including a 401(k) employee contribution with matching Company contributions (“Retirement Plan”). The Retirement Plan is identical to the plan provided to U.S.-based non-executive employees.
		Our DCP permits U.S.-based participants to defer salary, incentive bonuses or stock awards until retirement. Within the DCP, we have a non-qualified supplemental or excess retirement plan (“BEP”), which provides benefits in excess of IRS limits under the Retirement Plan.
	Non-U.S. Retirement Benefits and Deferred Compensation	Our International Retirement Savings Plan permits a small number of non-U.S. international assignees, including Mr. Campbell, to accumulate non-tax sheltered employee and Company contributions.
	Welfare Plans and Other Benefits	Provide for basic health care, life, and income security needs, including life, medical, dental, disability, and other employee welfare benefits, fringe benefits, and limited perquisites.
	Executive Officer Severance Benefit Plans and Arrangements	Provide severance benefits in the case of involuntary termination of employment in the form of salary continuation, target bonus, pro-rata bonus and outplacement services.

We believe these compensation elements are consistent with relevant competitive market practice and further our goal of attracting and retaining executive management.

Mr. Campbell’s compensation (other than Company contributions to the International Plan, which are paid in U.S. dollars) is paid in Thai Bhat, and Mr. Sabonnadiere’s compensation is paid in Euros. Throughout this document, (i) we converted each target element of the executive’s compensation into U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate as of December 31, 2014, and (ii) we converted each actual element of compensation paid to the executive into U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate published by http://finance.yahoo.com on the last day of the month in which the applicable compensation was paid.

Mix of Total Compensation

Our 2014 executive compensation is substantially focused on variable compensation, which includes a bonus opportunity under our AIP and the economic value of RSUs and PSUs granted under our 2005 Plan. A larger percentage of each of our named executive officer’s target 2014 total compensation was awarded in long-term incentives, which we believe incentivizes our named executive officers to achieve our key business objectives and create sustainable long-term stockholder value. The following table illustrates the target percentage of each compensation element as compared to target total compensation for each of our named executive officers for 2014. For purposes of this discussion, total compensation means the sum of base salary, annual cash incentive compensation, and long-term incentive compensation. The percentage of target compensation is calculated by dividing (i) the value of each target compensation element by (ii) the value of target total compensation. Note that the target percentages reflected in the table are based on target compensation amounts and therefore do not match the values reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table.”


Name and Title	Salary	AIP Bonus ⁽¹⁾	Long-Term Incentives ⁽²⁾	Total Compensation
Gregory B. Kenny
President and Chief Executive Officer	14%	20%	66%	100%

Brian J. Robinson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	19%	18%	63%	100%

Peter A. Campbell ⁽³⁾
Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Asia Pacific	25%	20%	55%	100%

Robert D. Kenny⁽⁴⁾
Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Africa	29%	27%	44%	100%

Gregory J. Lampert
Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Americas	19%	18%	63%	100%

Emmanuel Sabonnadiere⁽⁵⁾
Former Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Mediterranean	17%	18%	65%	100%

Robert J. Siverd⁽⁶⁾
Former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	22%	20%	58%	100%

⁽¹⁾	The percentage in the AIP Bonus column is based on the 2014 AIP bonus, assuming target level attainment, for each of our named executive officers.

⁽²⁾

The long-term incentive percentages are based on the grant date fair value of the total long-term incentives granted to each of our named executive officers in 2014. The long-term incentives granted in 2014 consist of grants of RSUs and PSUs. The grant date fair values for the RSUs and PSUs were calculated based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions on the grant date and are consistent with our estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined under FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For this purpose, the probable outcome was assumed to be at target level attainment.

⁽³⁾	Effective as of November 1, 2014, Mr. Campbell’s salary was increased to $385,000. The target percentages for Mr. Campbell are based on a base salary of $385,000.

⁽⁴⁾

Mr. R. Kenny was promoted to Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Africa effective August 1, 2014. Prior to August 1, 2014, Mr. R. Kenny was serving as Senior Vice President and General Manager of our global communications business. The target percentages for Mr. R. Kenny are based on the target base salary ($325,000) and AIP level ($300,000) set by the Compensation Committee upon Mr. R. Kenny’s promotion in August 2014.

⁽⁵⁾	Mr. Sabonnadiere served as Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Mediterranean through July 31, 2014. Mr. Sabonnadiere was succeeded by Mr. R. Kenny effective as of August 1, 2014.

⁽⁶⁾	Mr. Siverd retired from the Company effective as of July 1, 2014.

Our Compensation Committee Process

Our Compensation Committee reviews total target compensation levels annually. For purposes of this review, total target compensation means the sum of base salary, annual cash incentive targets, and long-term incentive targets. In preparation for the annual determination of each executive officer’s total target compensation, our Compensation Committee periodically meets to consider market trends, the competitiveness of our compensation program, and the performance of our executive officers individually and in relation to our overall performance. In making its final total target compensation determinations, our Compensation Committee applies a common methodology for all of our executive officers.

Chief Executive Officer Compensation. Our Chief Executive Officer’s overall compensation is set by our Compensation Committee based on its assessment of our Chief Executive Officer’s individual performance and our Company’s overall performance, as well as the financial and operating performance of a peer group and other relevant market data.

Other Named Executive Officers. Compensation for our other named executive officers is based on recommendations by our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer to our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee considers these recommendations based on each executive’s individual responsibility, experience, and overall performance, including the attainment of their individual performance objectives and internal pay comparisons among our executive group. In addition, in setting the compensation of our other named executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviews compensation data from a peer group and compensation surveys.

Our European based former executive officer, Mr. Sabonnadiere, had an employment agreement. Mr. Sabonnadiere’s employment agreement included the essential terms required by French law and provided for change in control and other severance benefits that were, to the extent legally permissible, closely aligned with our Executive Officer Severance Benefit Plan for U.S.-based executive officers, which was adopted in December 2007 (“Severance Plan”). In connection with Mr. Sabonnadiere’s transition from the Company, we and Mr. Sabonnadiere entered into a Separation Agreement and a Consulting Agreement, each of which is described more fully on page 65. The Consulting Agreement was terminated effective December 31, 2014. In connection with Mr. R. Kenny’s promotion, we and Mr. R. Kenny executed an Employee Secondment Offer Letter which sets forth the terms and conditions of Mr. R. Kenny’s secondment, which is described more fully on page 64.

Similarly, we and Mr. Campbell executed an Employment Offer Letter in 2012 which sets forth the terms and conditions of Mr. Campbell’s employment. In January 2015, Mr. Campbell communicated his intent to leave the organization effective March 31, 2015. See “— Changes in Executive Officers.” In connection with Mr. Campbell’s resignation, effective as of the close of business on March 31, 2015, we and Mr. Campbell entered into a Severance Agreement which is described more fully on page 64. None of our other named executive officers have employment agreements.

Role of Our Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee approved the appointment of Hay Group as its independent compensation consultant for 2014. As part of Hay Group’s appointment, the Compensation Committee requested a comprehensive review of the Company’s executive compensation program. Hay Group was engaged by and reported directly to our Compensation Committee and provided independent counsel on executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Hay Group pursuant to SEC rules and NYSE listing standards and concluded that no conflict of interest exists.

For our 2014 executive compensation program, Hay Group, at our Compensation Committee’s direction:

•

presented current trend information, such as market practices for each compensation component (i.e., base salary, structure and use of long-term incentives, prevalence of certain equity incentive vehicles, stock ownership guidelines, etc.), regulatory changes, accounting and tax changes, the economic and political climate, and other relevant topics for the current year;

•

reviewed and updated the comparator peer group with our Compensation Committee to reflect changes that were deemed appropriate for 2014;

•

provided an analysis of market and peer group data regarding base pay, bonus opportunity targets, long-term incentive grants, the mix and weighting of various forms of compensation, and the competitiveness of current compensation for our executive officers;

•

made recommendations to management and the Compensation Committee regarding executive compensation;

•

assisted in the design of our 2014 AIP, which contemplated a mix of financial and strategic measures;

•

assisted in the design of our 2014 equity awards, which included replacing options/RSU 75%/25% mix, with an equal mix of RSUs and PSUs;

•

made recommendations to management and the Compensation Committee on the total target compensation for all executive officers; and

•

made recommendations to the Compensation Committee on the design and target awards for our Board of Directors.

Competitive Market Pay Information

Our Compensation Committee reviews comparative analysis prepared by our compensation consultant as well as survey data and trend information for each of our executive officers. While the Compensation Committee reviews a full comparative analysis from our compensation consultant for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer on an annual basis, our Compensation Committee has not historically had a full comparative analysis completed for our other executive officers on an annual basis. In the years where our Compensation Committee does not have a full comparative analysis completed for our other executive officers, it reviews survey data and current compensation trend information that it and our compensation consultant deem relevant. In addition, our compensation consultant, at the Compensation Committee’s request, provides an annual review of long-term incentive award trends as a reference point for setting long-term incentive awards for each executive officer. In determining 2014 compensation, our Compensation Committee requested and reviewed a full comparative analysis for all of our executive officers.

Our Compensation Committee uses data from two sources as reference points to ensure that our executive compensation program offers competitive total compensation opportunities and reflects best practices in compensation plan design. These two sources are a comparator peer group and compensation survey data. The peer group analysis serves as the primary source in assessing our pay competitiveness. The survey analysis serves as a secondary source in validating and balancing peer group results by assessing pay competitiveness from a broader market and job function perspective. The use of multiple data sources contributes to a more holistic market analysis and provides clarity on the ranges of pay opportunity in the market.

The development of an appropriate peer group involves a balanced approach that focuses on size (revenue and/or market capitalization), sector (industry/business competitors) and business model (how the company makes money) with consideration of talent market, degree of internationalization, and customer base/market share. At the end of fiscal 2013, our peer group was reviewed by the Compensation Committee with the assistance of Hay Group. Based on such review and as a result of size, business fit concerns or acquisitions, the Compensation Committee approved the deletion of Carlisle Companies Incorporated, Cooper Industries plc, Eaton Corporation, Molex Incorporated, Mueller Industries, Inc., Thomas & Betts Corporation, Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., and Worthington Industries Inc. from the Company’s comparator peer group. In addition, also based on such review, the Compensation Committee approved the addition of the following companies to the comparator peer group: TE Connectivity Ltd., Steel Dynamics Inc., Mastec, Inc., Quanta Services, Inc. and EMCOR Group Inc. The comparator peer group changes were made to better balance the size, industry and business model of the comparator peer group as compared to our Company. Set forth below is the comparator peer group selected by the Compensation Committee for use in setting fiscal 2014 executive compensation:

AK Steel Holding Corporation

Allegheny Technologies Incorporated

Amphenol Corporation

Anixter International Inc.

Ball Corporation

Belden Inc.

Corning Incorporated

Dover Corporation

EMCOR Group Inc.

Hubbell Incorporated

ITT Corporation

Mastec, Inc.

Quanta Services, Inc.

Steel Dynamics Inc.

The Timken Company

TE Connectivity Ltd.

WESCO International, Inc.

We ranked at the 51^st percentile in revenue size relative to the companies that comprised this peer group.

The Compensation Committee also uses compensation survey data in its evaluation of executive pay. Survey data provides insight into positions that may not generally be reported in proxy statements. To assist the Compensation Committee in evaluating fiscal year 2014 compensation levels, the Compensation Committee reviewed information from the following surveys: US Mercer Executive Benchmark Database (2013) and Spain Mercer Benchmark Position Report (2012).

In addition to reviewing broad-based data and information from a peer group, our Compensation Committee also reviews executive pay tally sheets. The tally sheets contain information showing the executive officers’ annual pay, both target and actual bonus amounts, and prospective wealth under various performance and economic assumptions. Data from the tally sheets are considered as a guide by the Compensation Committee when establishing pay levels and opportunities. The Compensation Committee also considers internal comparisons of pay within the executive group.

Annual Cash Compensation

Base Salary. Base salaries are an important element of compensation and provide our executive officers with a base level of income. In determining base pay, our Compensation Committee considers the executive’s responsibilities, growth potential, individual performance against predetermined objectives, base salary competitiveness, as compared to the external market, and our Company’s operating performance. Base salaries are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee as part of its regular compensation review process based on the benchmarking process and the other factors described above, as well as special achievements and promotions. In February 2014, the Compensation Committee determined to maintain the base salary level for all

executive officers except Mr. Lampert, whose base salary was increased from $450,000 to $480,000, in recognition of the scope of his Americas assignment and in alignment with our comparator peer group, survey data and internal pay equity. In addition, in connection with Mr. R. Kenny’s promotion to Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Africa, the Compensation Committee authorized an increase in Mr. R. Kenny’s salary effective August 1, 2014, and in connection with Mr. Campbell’s anticipated assignment to oversee the operations of our non-core assets in Asia Pacific and Africa during the divestiture process, the Compensation Committee authorized an increase in Mr. Campbell’s salary effective November 1, 2014.

The 2014 approved annual salaries for our named executive officers were as follows:


Name	2014 Base Salary ⁽¹⁾
G. Kenny	$	900,000
B. Robinson	$	480,000
P. Campbell ⁽²⁾	$	385,000
R. Kenny ⁽³⁾	$	325,000
G. Lampert⁽⁴⁾	$	480,000
E. Sabonnadiere ⁽⁵⁾	$	303,137
R. Siverd⁽⁶⁾	$	390,000

⁽¹⁾	The 2014 base salaries for each of our named executive officers are consistent with our compensation philosophy and were generally near the low end or below the competitive range (i.e., +/- 15% of market median) as compared to our comparator peer group and compensation survey data.

⁽²⁾

Mr. Campbell’s 2014 base salary was originally set at 9,752,400 Thai Bhat ($296,473 using the Thai Bhat to U.S. dollar exchange rate as of December 31, 2014 of 0.0304). Effective as of November 1, 2014, Mr. Campbell received an increase in base salary to $385,000. Such increased salary amount has been included in the table above. Due to Mr. Campbell’s base salary increase becoming effective November 1, 2014, his actual 2014 salary was 10,226,340 Thai Bhat, ($314,562). For a description of the exchange rates used to calculate Mr. Campbell’s actual 2014 salary, see “Summary Compensation Table.”

⁽³⁾	Due to Mr. R. Kenny’s base salary increase becoming effective August 1, 2014, his actual 2014 salary was $283,538.

⁽⁴⁾	Due to Mr. Lampert’s base salary increase becoming effective February 10, 2014, his actual 2014 salary was $476,538.

⁽⁵⁾

Mr. Sabonnadiere’s base salary was paid in Euros and has been converted into U.S. dollars in this table using the Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate as of December 31, 2014 of 1.2162. Mr. Sabonnadiere’s 2014 base salary was €260,000 ($316,212 using the Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate as of December 31, 2014 of 1.2162). However, Mr. Sabonnadiere voluntarily requested, and our Compensation Committee approved, a temporary pay decrease beginning in 2012 in his base salary to exhibit his commitment to reducing expenses in our European and Mediterranean Region. Accordingly, Mr. Sabonnadiere’s 2014 base salary was reduced by €10,751, resulting in a 2014 base salary of €249,249 ($303,137 using the Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate as of December 31, 2014 of 1.2162). Such reduced base salary amount has been included in the table above. Due to Mr. Sabonnadiere’s transition from the Company effective as of August 1, 2014, his actual 2014 salary was €145,395, ($198,290). For a description of the exchange rates used to calculate Mr. Sabonnadiere’s actual 2014 salary, see “Summary Compensation Table.”

⁽⁶⁾	Due to Mr. Siverd’s retirement from the Company effective as of July 1, 2014, his actual 2014 salary was $225,000.

Annual Incentives. The AIP is an annual cash program intended to reward executives for achievement of pre-established financial and individual strategic performance objectives. AIP cash bonuses are intended to reward performance during the year and, therefore, can be highly variable from year to year. At the outset of the year, our Compensation Committee approves a target incentive award for each executive officer and financial targets for the year. At this time, individual performance objectives also are set for each of the executive officers

with the input from our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer. After the end of the fiscal year, our Compensation Committee measures actual performance against the pre-determined financial targets and reviews individual performance. In prior fiscal years, the AIP was structured so that individual performance was punitive, that is, our Compensation Committee would certify the financial results and then review individual performance to determine whether negative adjustments were appropriate. For 2014, our Compensation Committee, with the advice of our compensation consultant, restructured the AIP so that individual strategic goals, as more fully described below, are included as positive performance metrics under the AIP.

The performance criteria used as the basis for awards and the specific targets can vary from year to year. Generally, the financial targets are based on our annual financial plan and are typically set at levels that exceed the level of performance in prior years but consider our business and market outlook at that time as we operate in a highly cyclical industry. Similar to 2013, the Compensation Committee approved an initial performance target designed to qualify our 2014 AIP payouts as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code (i.e., “umbrella plan”). The Compensation Committee determined that given the cyclical nature of our business and unusual non-recurring charges, an umbrella plan would give it a certain level of flexibility while providing objective performance goals that are intended to preserve deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code. By exceeding this initial target performance level, executives qualify for potential AIP payouts up to a fixed maximum amount – actual AIP payouts will be dependent on the achievement of pre-established secondary financial and individual strategic performance goals. For 2014, the Compensation Committee determined that it would transition from operating income greater than $1 to adjusted EBITDA divided by $100 million being greater than 1 as the umbrella trigger (i.e., initial target performance level triggering potential bonus payouts under the AIP). The Compensation Committee believes that the adjusted EBITDA performance metric will provide a more meaningful and rigorous indicator of financial soundness for purposes of qualifying bonus payouts. For purposes of the AIP, “adjusted EBITDA” is defined as: operating income plus depreciation and amortization, with operating income being adjusted for extraordinary, nonrecurring or unusual charges and other certain items. The initial performance goal of adjusted EBITDA divided by $100 million being greater than 1 was satisfied for 2014.

The Compensation Committee, with input from Hay Group, and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, determined that for 2014, the secondary performance goals for each of our named executive officers would include (i) the financial metrics of adjusted EBITDA (to replace adjusted EPS used in 2013) and CCCD (to replace working capital efficiency used in 2013) and (ii) individual strategic measures. The performance goals were selected to reward executives for the achievement of targeted financial results and key strategic initiatives. The Compensation Committee decided to use these new financial performance goals as it believes that adjusted EBITDA is a better indicator of overall operating performance of our business and CCCD is a more efficient, streamlined measure of inventory-to-cash conversion. For purposes of the AIP, CCCD is defined as days inventory outstanding plus days sales outstanding minus days payable outstanding. The Compensation Committee introduced the individual strategic performance element to focus executive officers on more foundational initiatives that would help better position the Company for the future. In addition, our Compensation Committee, with the assistance of our compensation consultant, determined to add a regional performance component to the financial metrics. Accordingly, for 2014, the performance measures of our regional executives (Messrs. Campbell, R. Kenny, Lampert, and Sabonnadiere) included both Company-wide adjusted EBITDA and CCCD, as well as regional adjusted EBITDA and CCCD. Each of the regional executives’ 2014 regional level measures were tied to the region that such executive led in an effort to align such executives’ compensation with the financial performance of the applicable region.

2014 AIP Financial Performance Measures and Actual Results

The following table sets forth the 2014 AIP financial performance measures and the actual results:


Performance measures	Adjusted EBITDA								CCCD
Performance measures	Threshold		Target		Maximum		Actual		Threshold		Target		Maximum		Actual
Corporate -Level
Corporate ⁽¹⁾	$	324.9M	$	364.9M	$	403.9M		⁽³⁾		92.0		91.0		90.0	⁽³⁾
Regional-Level
North America	$	176.6M	$	200.6M	$	227.6M	$	194.7M⁽⁴⁾		106.0		105.0		104.0	⁽³⁾
Latin America ⁽¹⁾	$	45.3M	$	50.3M	$	54.3M		⁽³⁾		99.0		98.0		97.0	98.4
Europe ⁽²⁾	$	46.4M	$	50.9M	$	54.3M	$	49.0M⁽⁴⁾		56.0		55.0		54.0	⁽³⁾
Africa⁽²⁾	$	12.3M	$	14.8M	$	16.4M		⁽³⁾		120.0		116.0		112.0	⁽³⁾
Asia Pacific	$	44.3M	$	48.3M	$	51.3M		⁽³⁾		82.0		81.0		80.0	⁽³⁾

⁽¹⁾	Excludes Venezuela.

⁽²⁾

Mr. Sabonnadiere served as Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Mediterranean through July 31, 2014. Mr. Sabonnadiere was succeeded by Mr. R. Kenny effective as of August 1, 2014. The regional performance metrics applicable to Europe and Africa set forth in the table above applied to Mr. Sabonnadiere through July 31, 2014 and became applicable to Mr. R. Kenny upon his promotion as of August 1, 2014.

⁽³⁾	Actual results were below the threshold performance metric.

⁽⁴⁾	For a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to their corresponding GAAP measures see Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement.

The following table sets forth the 2014 AIP performance weightings at target. The performance weightings assigned to corporate executives and regional executives for the 2014 AIP were intended to balance the importance of achieving key corporate and regional financial metrics with the individual strategic measures necessary to better position the Company for the future.


Performance measures	Executive Level and Performance Weighting
Performance measures	Corporate Executives⁽¹⁾	Regional Executives⁽²⁾
Corporate-Level
Adjusted EBITDA	65%	45%
CCCD	15%	10%
Regional-Level
Adjusted EBITDA	N/A	15%⁽³⁾
CCCD	N/A	10%⁽³⁾
Strategic Measures
By Executive	20%	20%

⁽¹⁾	Corporate executives included Messrs. G. Kenny, Robinson and Siverd.

⁽²⁾	Regional executives included Messrs. Campbell, R. Kenny, Lampert, and Sabonnadiere.

⁽³⁾

The weightings at target for regional level measures for (a) Mr. Lampert were further divided as follows: adjusted EBITDA 10.5% and CCCD 7.0% for North America and adjusted EBITDA 4.5% and CCCD 3.0% for Latin America (excluding Venezuela); and (b) Mr. Sabonnadiere and Mr. R. Kenny were further divided as follows: adjusted EBITDA 12.0% and CCCD 8.0% for Europe and adjusted EBITDA 3.0% and CCCD 2.0% for Africa.

There would be no payout under the 2014 AIP with respect to any performance metric for which actual performance did not meet the threshold level. Payout level at threshold would be at 50 percent of target.

Achievement between specified performance levels would result in a payout based on straight-line interpolation. In addition, the AIP had a cap in 2014 of 200 percent of target as a maximum award level for our named executive officers.

2014 Individual Strategic Measures

The individual strategic measures for each of our named executive officers were established by our Compensation Committee with input from the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer for the other executive officers. The table below provides a general description of the individual strategic measures which were set for each of our named executive officers. We have not disclosed the specific individual strategic measures because we believe this disclosure would reveal confidential strategic objectives and information that is not otherwise publicly disclosed by us and would result in competitive harm to us. The strategic measures were designed to be “stretch” goals that were achievable with what we believe represented an elevated level of effort and performance.


Name	General Description of Individual Strategic Measures
G. Kenny	•	Lead improvements in our under–performing assets
	•	Realize improvements in Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
	•	Drive profitable growth of our turnkey business
	•	Actively coach and develop our pipeline of global successors

B. Robinson	•	Drive a high performance, value-added global finance organization
	•	Champion and support our efforts to drive a culture of performance, development of our talent base and our One Company culture of common values and behaviors
	•	Lead evaluation of cost savings opportunities across the Company

P. Campbell	•	Implement a business recovery plan for our under-performing assets in the Asia Pacific region
	•	Evaluate and determine optimal strategy for the Oceania businesses
	•	Establish a new sales and marketing team, which is integrated with the existing customer service center

R. Kenny	•	Execution of the on-boarding plan in preparation for assuming the new role of President and CEO, Europe and Africa
	•	Other regional improvements to ensure delivery of financial targets

G. Lampert	•	Successfully deploy improvement initiatives for our under-performing assets in the Americas
	•	Processes and system implementation across Latin America
	•	Champion and support our efforts to upgrade and develop talent across the Americas

E. Sabonnadiere	•	Build a true high performing regional leadership team
	•	Lead the divestment of certain underperforming assets in the Europe and Mediterranean region
	•	Establishment of standardized processes across Europe
	•	Leadership of our turnkey business; strategy, execution and performance

R. Siverd	•	Actively manage and efficiently resolve significant pending legal issues
	•	Actively coach and develop successors identified for the General Counsel role

The payout of the strategic measure component of annual performance awards under the AIP is more qualitative in nature and subjective in measurement. These qualitative measures — which the Compensation Committee approves for each executive at the beginning of each performance year— focus executive officers on more foundational initiatives that will help better position the Company for the future. Following the end of the performance year, the Compensation Committee subjectively reviews each executive’s performance against the various strategic measures and considers any special factors that could have affected performance during the year. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee approved AIP payouts to Messrs. G. Kenny, Robinson, Lampert, R. Kenny and Campbell based on the achievement of their various strategic measures as discussed in more detail below. See “— 2014 Individual AIP Targets and Awards.”

2014 Individual AIP Targets and Awards

Target AIP levels for the 2014 performance year for the named executive officers are set forth in the table below. Award levels at target under the AIP are generally above market median levels, but within the competitive range, as determined by reference to our comparator peer group and compensation survey data, with the opportunity to earn more or less depending on actual financial performance of the Company and individual performance. For 2014, the Compensation Committee determined to maintain the target AIP levels for all executive officers except Mr. Lampert, whose target AIP level was increased from $450,000 to $460,000 in recognition of the scope of his Americas role and in alignment with the our comparator peer group, survey data and internal pay equity.

In determining actual AIP awards, the Compensation Committee reviewed corporate and regional results together with each executive officer’s individual performance against the strategic measures during 2014. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee approved AIP payouts as discussed below:

G. Kenny. In its review of Mr. G. Kenny’s performance in fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee considered a number of factors affecting our performance as well as the fact that under Mr. G. Kenny’s leadership we saw material improvement in our turnkey business and started the implementation of two strategic initiatives which focused on enhancing our performance both in the short and long-term, i.e.; the restructuring program and the divestiture program. In addition, Mr. G. Kenny drove significant focus to building processes, infrastructure, strengthening internal controls, enhancing leadership teams, upgrading talent and reinforcing our “One Company” value-based performance driven culture. Corporate adjusted EBITDA and CCCD financial metrics did not meet threshold performance levels. Based on Mr. G. Kenny’s achievement against his strategic measures, the Compensation Committee approved an AIP payout of $250,000, or 20% of his 2014 AIP target level.

B. Robinson. As our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Robinson continued to lead the finance and accounting function globally, further strengthening these areas and their partnership with our business leaders. Mr. Robinson played a pivotal role in corporate financing activities, including the achievement of year-end cash flow results and a reduction in our net debt. He also played a lead role in implementing two rounds of cost reductions throughout the year. Mr. Robinson led our restructuring program and established and directed the cross-functional, global team accountable for all divestiture activities, including internal preparations, vetting of initial interests and engagement of professional advisors. Corporate adjusted EBITDA and CCCD financial metrics did not meet threshold performance levels. Based on Mr. Robinson’s accomplishments against his strategic measures, the Chief Executive Officer recommended, and the Compensation Committee approved, a 2014 AIP payout of $161,000, or 35% of his 2014 AIP target level.

G. Lampert. As the Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Americas, Mr. Lampert continued to provide strong leadership across two very distinct end-markets. North America was seen as a source of strength; however, Latin America continued to experience erratic and weak demand. Under Mr. Lampert’s leadership, many difficult restructuring decisions were taken across the Americas in order to position the businesses for success in 2015, including but not limited to, the closure and/or downsizing

of several manufacturing plants. In addition, Mr. Lampert oversaw the implementation of key systems and processes across Latin America, and continued to play a key leadership role in the building of talent across the businesses. Based on the North America adjusted EBITDA and Latin America CCCD business results, which exceeded threshold performance levels, and Mr. Lampert’s accomplishments against his strategic measures, the Chief Executive Officer recommended, and the Compensation Committee approved, a 2014 AIP payout of $177,704, or 39% of his 2014 AIP target level.

R. Kenny. Mr. R. Kenny was appointed to his role as Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Africa in August 2014, after having served as our SVP, Communications for the first seven months of fiscal 2014. In his new capacity, Mr. R. Kenny has full responsibility for the Europe and Africa business. The European business was a source of strength for the Company. The African market however, experienced uneven demand, and ultimately the decision to divest the businesses in Africa was taken. Under Mr. R. Kenny’s leadership, a number of important accomplishments were noted in Europe in a very short period of time, including, but not limited to, continued positive execution of submarine turnkey projects; improved operating cash flow, including strong working capital management, particularly inventory; SG&A cost reductions; full repayment of the European borrowings under our senior secured credit facility; and systemic improvements to IT. As a result of Mr. R. Kenny’s accomplishments in his role as SVP, Communications, the European adjusted EBITDA business results, which exceeded threshold performance levels, and his individual performance against his strategic measures, the Chief Executive Officer recommended, and the Compensation Committee approved, a 2014 AIP payout of $100,205, or 54% of his 2014 AIP target level.

P. Campbell. In his role as Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Asia Pacific Mr. Campbell led a diverse and highly committed team of leaders focused on achieving both the financial and strategic objectives that were approved at the beginning of 2014. Asia Pacific experienced uneven demand and a shortfall in performance commitments, which necessitated an intervention including the restructuring program and ultimately the decision to divest the businesses in Asia Pacific. Within the context of the divestiture program, under Mr. Campbell’s leadership, resources were immediately redirected and focused on managing the businesses simultaneous to selling the operations. Mr. Campbell successfully created a new operating model with newly established regional functional leaders, reinforcing the connection between the global and unit functions. Corporate and regional adjusted EBITDA and CCCD financial metrics did not meet threshold performance levels. Based on Mr. Campbell’s accomplishments against his strategic measures, the Chief Executive Officer recommended, and the Compensation Committee approved, a 2014 AIP payout of 1,950,080 Thai Baht ($59,282), or 20% of his 2014 AIP target level. For a description of the exchange rate used to calculate Mr. Campbell’s actual AIP payout, see “Summary Compensation Table.”

For the 2014 performance year, the Compensation Committee made annual incentive awards to the named executive officers ranging from 20% to 54% of the target award value, as reflected in the following table.


Name	Target AIP Level			Actual AIP Payout		Percentage of Target
G. Kenny	$	1,250,000		$	250,000		20	%
B. Robinson	$	460,000		$	161,000		35	%
P. Campbell ⁽¹⁾	$	296,473		$	59,282		20	%
R. Kenny	$	184,063	⁽²⁾	$	100,205		54	%
G. Lampert	$	460,000		$	177,704		39	%
E. Sabonnadiere ⁽³⁾	$	322,293			⁽⁴⁾		^—
R. Siverd	$	360,000			^{— (5)}		^—

⁽¹⁾	Mr. Campbell’s target bonus was 9,752,400 Thai Bhat and has been converted into U.S. dollars in this table using the Thai Bhat to U.S. dollar exchange rate as of December 31, 2014 of 0.0304. Mr. Campbell’s AIP

payout was 1,950,080 Thai Bhat ($59,282). For a description of the exchange rate used to calculate Mr. Campbell’s actual AIP payout, see “Summary Compensation Table.”

⁽²⁾

In connection with Mr. R. Kenny’s promotion to Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Africa, the Compensation Committee set Mr. R. Kenny’s target AIP level at $300,000, to be applied pro-rata from August 1, 2014. Prior to his promotion, Mr. R. Kenny was a participant in the Company’s North American Region Annual Incentive Plan. Accordingly, for 2014, seven months of Mr. R. Kenny’s cash incentive award is tied to the Company’s North American Region Annual Incentive Plan (with a target level of $59,062), and five months of Mr. R. Kenny’s cash incentive award is tied to the AIP (with a target level of $125,000).

⁽³⁾	Mr. Sabonnadiere’s target bonus was €265,000 and has been converted into U.S. dollars in this table using the Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate as of December 31, 2014 of 1.2162.

⁽⁴⁾

In connection with Mr. Sabonnadiere’s transition from the Company, we and Mr. Sabonnadiere entered into a Separation Agreement pursuant to which we agreed to pay Mr. Sabonnadiere a pro-rata amount (7/12) of Mr. Sabonnadiere’s target AIP bonus for 2014, or €154,583 ( $210,927). For a description of the exchange rate used to calculate Mr. Sabonnadiere’s compensation, see “Summary Compensation Table.”

⁽⁵⁾	Mr. Siverd forfeited his right to any payment under the AIP upon his retirement on July 1, 2014.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

Long-term incentive awards are granted to our executive officers under our 2005 Plan approved by our stockholders in 2005, with the performance measures reapproved by stockholders in 2010. The target value for each long-term incentive award for each executive officer is determined by our Compensation Committee taking into consideration our Company’s performance in the past year and the contributions made by our executive officers as a whole, within the context of market practices. Grants of equity awards for executive officers generally are approved on an annual basis on the date of the first meeting of the Compensation Committee; this date is set in advance in the prior year. The number of shares subject to awards of options, restricted stock, RSUs and PSUs are generally computed based on an average twenty day stock price as of the date of our Compensation Committee meeting, which is approximately one week in advance of the grant date. Such equity grants have historically been made effective on the day after the date of the earnings release. Awards also may be granted at the time of a special event, such as upon employment or a significant promotion.

Each year, our Compensation Committee, with input from our compensation consultant, reviews the relative equity incentive mix for our executive officers and makes a final determination. For 2014, our Compensation Committee determined that the long-term incentive award mix should be comprised of 50 percent RSUs and 50 percent PSUs. In 2013, the mix was structured to provide 75 percent of the grant date value in the form of stock options and 25 percent of the grant date value in the form of RSUs. Our Compensation Committee determined that this new mix of long-term equity awards would be an effective balance of providing a meaningful level of retention and emphasizing direct performance linkage. PSUs reinforce our commitment to a pay for performance philosophy as awards are only earned if specific levels of performance are achieved. PSUs, which vest (if at all) after the completion of a three-year performance period, provide our executive officers with a strong incentive for achieving specific financial results that support our goal for creating long-term stockholder value.

RSUs. In February 2014, the Compensation Committee awarded our named executive officers (other than Mr. R. Kenny) RSUs which were each subject to vesting conditions based on continued employment and achievement of specified performance goals. If we achieve a performance target based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization as adjusted for extraordinary, nonrecurring or unusual charges and other certain items (“RSU adjusted EBITDA”) for the applicable calendar year and if the named executive officer continues in employment, one-third of each RSU will vest on each of December 31, 2014, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2016. Under the vesting terms, if the named executive officer continues in employment: (i) one-third of the RSU will vest if RSU adjusted EBITDA divided by $100 million is greater than one for the 2014 calendar year; (ii) one-third of the RSU (plus any unvested portion of the RSU attributable to the 2014 calendar year) will vest if RSU adjusted EBITDA divided by $100 million is greater than one for the 2015

calendar year; and (iii) the remaining one-third of the RSU (plus any unvested portion of the RSU attributable to the 2014 and/or 2015 calendar years) will vest if RSU adjusted EBITDA divided by $100 million is greater than one for the 2016 calendar year. In each case, vesting is contingent upon certification by the Compensation Committee that the applicable performance condition has been achieved. The RSUs issued in 2014 provide for dividend equivalent rights during the vesting period. The dividend equivalent rights will be paid in cash, subject to the same vesting and forfeiture provisions as the RSUs. Similar to the change made in the AIP, the Compensation Committee replaced the performance metric applicable to the RSUs to an RSU adjusted EBITDA metric (replacing the 2013 metric of operating income greater than $1). The Compensation Committee made such change as it believes that the adjusted EBITDA performance metric will provide a more meaningful and rigorous indicator of financial soundness for purposes of vesting of equity awards. The performance goal of RSU adjusted EBITDA divided by $100 million being greater than 1 was satisfied for the 2014 calendar year.

PSUs. In February 2014, the Compensation Committee awarded our named executive officers (other than Mr. R. Kenny) a target number of PSUs that are earned subject to the Company’s performance under two cumulative three-year performance metrics, relative total shareholder return (“RTSR”) and return on invested capital (“ROIC”), with assigned weightings of 50% and 50%, respectively. The Compensation Committee determined that RTSR and ROIC provide the best balance between outperformance and absolute performance, while strengthening the alignment of long-term incentive payments with shareholder value creation and capital efficiency. RTSR is measured by ranking General Cable’s 3-year stock price return to the companies in a comparator peer group. The Compensation Committee selected, with the assistance of Hay Group, the S&P 1500 Capital Goods Index to use as the comparator group as such Index reflected companies within similar business to the Company and that were aligned with our business cycles. Therefore, the companies within such Index should be similarly affected by market/industry conditions. RTSR performance upon the completion of the performance period will be assessed against the S&P 1500 Capital Goods Index. The RTSR performance percentiles were adopted by the Compensation Committee based on their assessment that such percentiles reflect market competitive long-term incentive pay practices, as well as meaningful levels of relative performance that warrant PSU payouts at threshold, target and maximum levels. ROIC measures how effectively we manage capital invested in our operations. At the beginning of the performance period, threshold, target, and maximum ROIC goals were set by the Compensation Committee based on General Cable’s business outlook and market conditions at that time. The performance period commenced on January 1, 2014 and ends on December 31, 2016. Grants are denominated and settled in shares of General Cable common stock. Based on the performance at the end of the three-year period, our named executive officers may earn less or more than the target award granted. RTSR performance below the 30^th percentile of our performance peer group or ROIC performance below 6% will result in 0% payout for each metric. The maximum payout for each metric is 200%. The performance metrics operate independently. Limitations on the units subject to the RTSR performance metric dictate that, if General Cable’s total shareholder return over the period is negative, the maximum amount earned shall be capped at target. As a result, even if General Cable’s relative three-year total shareholder return is ranked at the top of its performance comparator group, but is negative on an absolute basis, our named executive officers would only earn target on the RTSR portion of the PSUs. The following table sets forth the percentage of PSUs which will vest at the end of the three-year performance period based on the level of performance. The targets set forth below were set for compensation purposes only and do not constitute, and should not be viewed as, management’s projection of future results.


	<Minimum	Minimum	Target	Maximum

RTSR⁽¹⁾	Less than 30^th Percentile	30^th Percentile	50^th Percentile	75^th Percentile or Above
Vested Percent of RTSR Units	0%	50%	100%	200%

ROIC⁽²⁾	Less than 6%	6%	7%	8% or Above
Vested Percent of ROIC Units	0%	50%	100%	200%

⁽¹⁾

The 2014 PSUs defined RTSR as the Company’s average total shareholder return for each performance period in comparison to the average total shareholder return for the S&P 1500 Capital Goods Index for each performance period. Total shareholder return was defined as (a) the difference between the average trading price of one share of the Company’s common stock as reflected on the New York Stock Exchange for (i) the 30 day period preceding the first day of the performance period and (ii) the 30 day period preceding the last day of the performance period, divided by (b) the average trading price of one share of the Company’s common stock as reflected on the New York Stock Exchange for the 30 day period preceding the first day of the performance period.

⁽²⁾	The 2014 PSUs defined ROIC as net operating profit after tax divided by invested capital. Invested capital is equal to the Company’s net debt plus shareholder’s equity. Net operating profit after tax will be adjusted for extraordinary, nonrecurring or unusual charges and other certain items.

The PSUs issued in 2014 provide for dividend equivalent rights during the vesting period. The dividend equivalent rights will be paid in cash, subject to the same vesting and forfeiture provisions as the PSUs.

As discussed above, awards may be granted at the time of a special event, such as upon employment or a significant promotion. Mr. R. Kenny received awards of RSUs and PSUs in August 2014 upon his promotion to Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Africa. The terms of the RSUs and PSUs granted to Mr. R. Kenny in August 2014 are identical to the terms of awards issued to our other named executive officers in February 2014. The grant date fair value of the 2014 RSU and PSU awards to our named executive officers (under FASB ASC Topic 718) is shown in the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal 2014 Table.

Compensation Recoupment Policy

In December 2011, our Board of Directors adopted an incentive compensation recoupment policy (“Clawback Policy”) that allows us to recover incentive-based compensation from our executive officers in the event we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws or from executive officers or key employees if the individual materially violates our Code of Ethics. Upon the restatement of our financial statements due to material noncompliance, our Board of Directors may, to the fullest extent permitted by law, require each current and former executive officer to reimburse us for any amount paid within the last thirty-six (36) months in excess of the amounts that would have been paid under our restated financial statements. In the event of a material violation of our Code of Ethics by an executive officer or key employee, our Board of Directors can recover any incentive-based compensation paid to such individual within the last twelve (12) months. Our Board of Directors has the sole discretion to determine the form and timing of the recovery, which may include repayment and an adjustment to future incentive-based compensation payouts or grants. The remedies under our Clawback Policy are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any legal and equitable claims we may have or any actions imposed by law enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities. Our Clawback Policy was effective and applies to all incentive-based compensation payouts or grants, including grants, awards or amounts paid under the AIP or 2005 Plan, after January 1, 2012.

Accounting Considerations

The accounting standards applicable to the various forms of long-term incentive plans under FASB ASC Topic 718 (formerly FASB Statement 123R) is one factor that the Compensation Committee and we consider in the design of our long-term equity incentive programs. The Compensation Committee and we monitor FASB ASC Topic 718 expense, but expense will not be the most important factor in making decisions about our long-term incentive plans.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Our Compensation Committee takes into account the tax impact of material provisions of and changes to our executive compensation program and discusses such matters periodically during the year. Generally, we realize a tax deduction upon the payment of compensation to the executive officer. In general, our policy is to optimize the tax deductibility of executive compensation so long as deductibility is consistent with more important objectives (as determined by the Compensation Committee, in the exercise of its business judgment) of maintaining competitive, motivational performance-based compensation that is aligned with stockholder interests and retaining executive officers. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee may, in the exercise of such discretion, approve the payment of compensation regardless of its deductibility.

Retirement Plans and Other Company Benefits

Our U.S.-based named executive officers participate in the full range and scope of retirement and welfare and other plans as all other U.S.-based employees of General Cable do, except as noted below. In this area, as in other aspects of our compensation program, we target these types of benefits to be competitive within the relevant market identified.

Retirement Benefits. General Cable and our subsidiaries sponsor Retirement and Savings Plans (“Retirement Plans”) for salaried and hourly employees in the United States. The Retirement Plans are tax-qualified, defined contribution plans under which fixed contributions are made for the account of each participating employee each year. For salaried employees, under the retirement component, a contribution of four percent of eligible compensation is made, and under the savings or 401(k) component, a matching contribution is made in the amount of two percent of eligible compensation so long as the employee has contributed at least four percent of compensation through our payroll deduction program. The federal statutory limit for eligible compensation in 2014 was $260,000. These contribution and matching percentages are intended to reflect competitive market terms and conditions for plans of this type. Participating employees may direct the investment of Company and individual contributions into one or more of the investment options offered by the Retirement Plans.

General Cable and our subsidiaries also maintain the DCP, which permits deferral of salary, incentive bonuses, and stock awards by U.S.-based participants, including our U.S.-based named executive officers. We offer the DCP because it allows us to have a more competitive benefits program. In 2007, we combined this plan with the BEP and our former Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). The BEP is designed to make up benefits on certain wages, which are not eligible for Company matching or retirement contributions because of Internal Revenue Service limits on inclusion of these amounts in our Retirement Plans. The BEP has investment options and vesting requirements similar to the Retirement Plans. The SERP was adopted in 2000 in which a limited number of key managers, including certain of our named executive officers, participated. In 2007, benefit accruals under the SERP were frozen and converted to an account balance plan subject to vesting to better align our total retirement related benefits with the objectives of these plans and their costs. The value of accounts of our eligible named executive officers from the SERP is included in the DCP. Participants may receive their vested benefits under the Retirement Plans and the DCP on termination or retirement.

Mr. G. Kenny is a participant in the Retirement Income Guarantee Plan (“RIGP”) established by General Cable’s predecessor. RIGP benefits are principally funded under the General Cable Master Pension Plan, a qualified defined benefit plan. Benefit accruals under the RIGP were frozen in 1993. Under the RIGP, a target benefit is calculated using pay and service through 1993 and adjusted for certain defined contribution account balances. In prior years, these defined contribution accounts provided projected balances in excess of the target benefit for Mr. G. Kenny, the only current executive officer eligible for this benefit. Because of investment performance in the value of the offset accounts in 2014, Mr. G. Kenny is not currently projected to receive a benefit under the RIGP. The amount of the RIGP benefit will fluctuate from year to year based on the value of the offsetting accounts and will depend on Mr. G. Kenny’s actual retirement date. Mr. Siverd was also a participant in the RIGP. In connection with Mr. Siverd’s retirement on July 1, 2014, Mr. Siverd received a qualified benefit of $108,117 from the RIGP.

Mr. Sabonnadiere, a French national formerly based in Spain, was not eligible to participate in the Retirement Plans or the DCP. Under French law, Mr. Sabonnadiere received statutory retirement and medical benefits prior to his transition from General Cable effective as of August 1, 2014.

Mr. Campbell, a UK national based in Thailand, is not eligible to participate in the Retirement Plans or the DCP. He is a participant in the International Retirement Savings Plan (the “International Plan”), a non-tax sheltered plan maintained outside the United States for a select group of international assignees. The Company contributes 5% of the participant’s base salary and the Company contributes an additional 2.5% of base salary so long as the participant has contributed at least 5% percent of base salary through payroll deduction. Participating employees may direct the investment of Company and individual contributions into one or more of the investment options offered by the International Plan. Mr. Campbell also receives fully insured health and welfare benefits including medical, dental, vision, long term disability and life insurance coverages.

Other Benefits. We believe that our employee benefit plans, including retirement plans, deferred compensation, perquisites and welfare plans, are of the type commonly offered by other employers. These benefits form part of our compensation philosophy and we continue to offer them because we believe they are necessary in order to attract, motivate, and retain talented executive officers.

Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements

In connection with Mr. Sabonnadiere’s transition from the Company, we and Mr. Sabonnadiere entered into a Separation Agreement and a Consulting Agreement, each of which is described more fully on page 65. Mr. R. Kenny’s Employee Secondment Offer Letter, which is described more fully on page 64, provides that if Mr. R. Kenny’s secondment/employment is terminated by the Company for reasons other than cause, Mr. R. Kenny shall be entitled to repatriation to his home country. In connection with Mr. Campbell’s resignation, effective as of the close of business on March 31, 2015, we and Mr. Campbell entered into a Severance Agreement which provides Mr. Campbell with various post-employment payments and benefits. Mr. Campbell’s Severance Agreement is described more fully on page 64. None of our other named executive officers has an employment agreement which provides for severance benefits or a change in control agreement. Our named executive officers may be eligible for post-employment payments and benefits in certain circumstances upon termination or a change in control of the Company. These post-employment payments and benefits arise under the Severance Plan, the General Cable Corporation 2014 Executive Officer Severance Benefit Plan (the “2014 Severance Plan”) and the 2005 Plan and its predecessor plans. These potential severance benefits are discussed under “Change in Control and Other Post-Employment Payments and Benefits” beginning at page 61.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Consistent with our executive compensation philosophy and the principle of aligning executive and stockholder interests, we require our executive officers to maintain minimum ownership levels of General Cable common stock. The following Stock Ownership Guidelines were established by our Board in 2005 and amended in December 2010.


Executive	Ownership Multiple of Base Salary
Chief Executive Officer		6 times
Chief Financial Officer		3 times
Executive Vice Presidents		3 times

Shares that are counted for purposes of satisfying ownership requirements are shares directly owned, vested and unvested shares of restricted common stock and restricted stock units, and shares held in the DCP. All of our executive officers must comply with these ownership requirements within five (5) years from their appointment as an executive officer.

The foregoing stock ownership requirements are measured annually on the last day of the calendar year unless our Board determines otherwise. For purposes of the measurement, the individual’s stock ownership shall be valued based on the average daily close price of our common stock during the prior thirty-six (36) full calendar months. All of our named executive officers who have been executive officers of General Cable for at least five years were in compliance with these Guidelines as of December 31, 2014.

2014 Say on Pay Vote

Consistent with our pay for performance culture, our Compensation Committee annually reviews our executive compensation program to ensure it addresses our human resource needs and reflects our corporate culture, which includes our values and the way we operate our business. As part of our annual review, our Compensation Committee also considered the voting results on our executive compensation proposal at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held in May 2014. Our stockholders affirmed their support of our executive compensation program in 2014 by casting 78.61 percent of the votes in favor of our named executive officers’ compensation. As this approval rate was down from the prior year’s 97.3 percent approval rate, our Compensation Committee considered this change when evaluating our 2014 executive compensation program and establishing our 2015 program. Changes made as a result of this evaluation are discussed within the “Changes in 2015 Executive Compensation” section below. Our Compensation Committee has considered and intends to continue considering the voting results on future executive compensation programs as it makes future executive compensation decisions.

Changes in 2015 Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee made the following changes to executive officer compensation for 2015: (i) added an additional corporate level measure, ROIC, to the AIP for all executive officers, (ii) introduced a measure for discontinued operations for corporate executives; (iii) recalibrated the corporate level and regional level performance weightings in the AIP to shift more emphasis of overall financial performance measurement from the corporate level to the regional level for regional executives; and (iv) altered the mix of long-term incentive awards which, in 2015, will be comprised of one-third RSUs, one-third PSUs and one-third cash. Our Compensation Committee made these changes related to the AIP as it believes they are consistent with our compensation philosophy, pay for performance environment and market trends. The addition of the measure for discontinued operations was intended to link a significant portion of the corporate executives’ compensation to the successful execution of strategic initiatives to simplify our geographic portfolio and reduce organizational complexity. In addition, the Compensation Committee approved the introduction of one-third of the long-term incentive award being paid in the form of cash as it believes that such addition is consistent with our pay for performance environment and takes into account the limited availability of the remaining share reserve under our 2005 Plan. As a result of such limited availability, our Board of Directors recently adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the Amended Plan, which is an amendment and restatement of the 2005 Plan. Stockholder approval of the Amended Plan is being sought in order to, among other things, extend the term of the Amended Plan until May 14, 2025 and authorize additional shares. See “Proposal 4 – Approval of the Amended and Restated General Cable Stock Incentive Plan.”

Changes in Executive Officers

On October 29, 2014, we announced that Mr. G. Kenny will transition out of his role as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Our Board has formed a search committee to identify our next Chief Executive Officer and has retained an executive search firm to assist in the process. Mr. G. Kenny will remain in his current position during the search until a successor is in place in order to facilitate an orderly transition of his responsibilities. Upon the appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer, it is expected that Mr. G. Kenny will remain available to assist the Company, in whatever capacity is deemed in the best interests of the Company, during this time of transition and sale of the Company’s operations in Asia Pacific and Africa.

On October 29, 2014, we announced our intent to divest all of our manufacturing operations in Asia Pacific and Africa in order to simplify our global portfolio and reduce operational complexity. Given the progress made in this divestiture process, in January 2015, Mr. Campbell communicated his intent to leave the organization effective March 31, 2015. As of January 2015, Mr. R. Kenny assumed the day-to-day responsibility for our operations in Africa and effective March 31, 2015, Mr. G. Kenny will assume overall operational accountability for our businesses held for sale in Asia Pacific and Africa.

In January 2015, our Board approved the promotion and appointment of the following executives:

•

Emerson C. Moser was named Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Moser was previously Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary and had been serving as our interim Chief Legal Officer since July 2014.

•

Kurt L. Drake was hired to fill a newly created standalone position of Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer. Mr. Drake has 19 years of experience in compliance and finance.

Forward Looking Statements

The information discussed in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis contains statements regarding future individual and Company performance measures, targets, and other goals. These goals are disclosed in the limited context of our executive compensation program and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We specifically caution investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth summary information relating to all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the individuals listed in the table below, collectively referred to as our “named executive officers,” for all services rendered in all capacities to us and our subsidiaries during the fiscal years noted below.


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($) ⁽²⁾		Stock Awards ($) ⁽³⁾		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) ⁽⁴⁾		All Other Compensation ($) ⁽⁵⁾		Total ($)
Gregory B. Kenny President and Chief Executive Officer		2014 2013 2012		900,000 900,000 900,000		4,154,105 845,760 910,000		— 2,942,007 3,112,234		250,000 166,250 312,500		103,331 112,106 127,460		5,407,435 4,966,123 5,362,194
Brian J. Robinson Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2014 2013 2012		480,000 440,019 375,000		1,606,478 317,160 260,000		— 1,117,218 855,409		161,000 61,180 135,000		48,461 42,391 47,715		2,295,939 1,977,968 1,673,124
Peter A. Campbell ⁽¹⁾ Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Asia Pacific		2014		314,562		830,692		—		59,282		251,750		1,456,286
Robert D. Kenny Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Africa		2014		283,538		486,149		—		100,205		112,236		982,128
Gregory J. Lampert Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Americas		2014 2013 2012		476,538 442,692 355,000		1,606,478 317,160 260,000		— 1,117,218 855,409		177,704 59,850 180,000		48,173 53,700 47,660		2,308,893 1,990,620 1,698,069
Emmanuel Sabonnadiere ⁽¹⁾ Former Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, General Cable Europe and Mediterranean		2014 2013 2012		198,290 331,931 328,339		1,163,356 951,480 1,007,500		— — —		— 48,676 174,900		1,240,815 57,601 75,649		2,602,461 1,389,688 1,586,388
Robert J. Siverd Former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary		2014 2013 2012		225,000 390,000 390,000		1,052,253 211,440 227,500		— 763,432 746,208		— 47,880 180,000		33,385 67,582 62,311		1,310,638 1,480,334 1,606,019

⁽¹⁾

Mr. Campbell’s compensation (other than Company contributions to the International Plan) is paid in Thai Bhat, and Mr. Sabonnadiere’s compensation is paid in Euros. For purposes of this table, we converted each element of Mr. Campbell’s monthly compensation (other than Company contributions to the International Plan, which are paid in U.S. dollars) and Mr. Sabonnadiere’s monthly compensation into U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate published by http://finance.yahoo.com on the last day of the month in which the applicable compensation was paid and then added the applicable monthly U.S. dollar amounts.

⁽²⁾

Our Compensation Committee authorized a salary increase for: (i) Mr. Lampert effective February 2014 in recognition of the scope of his Americas assignment, and in alignment with our comparator peer group, survey data and internal pay equity; (ii) Mr. R. Kenny in connection with his promotion effective August 2014; and (iii) Mr. Campbell effective November 2014 in connection with his anticipated assignment to oversee the operations of our non-core assets in Asia Pacific and Africa during the divestiture process. None of our other named executive officers received a base salary increase for 2014.

⁽³⁾	Represents the grant date fair value of awards determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See also Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

On February 13, 2014, our Compensation Committee granted Messrs. G. Kenny, Robinson, Campbell, Lampert, Sabonnadiere and Siverd 64,310, 24,870, 12,860, 24,870, 18,010 and 16,290 RSUs, respectively, and 64,310, 24,870, 12,860, 24,870, 18,010 and 16,290 PSUs, respectively. On August 1, 2014, in connection with Mr. R. Kenny’s promotion, our Compensation Committee granted Mr. R. Kenny 6,410 RSUs and 6,410 PSUs. The RSUs and PSUs granted to named executive officers in 2014 are subject to vesting and performance conditions described on pages 46-48. Prior to his promotion, on February 13, 2014, Mr. R. Kenny was granted 5,000 RSUs which vest pro-rata over three years on the anniversary of the date of grant beginning in 2015.

The “Stock Awards” column reports the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs and PSUs granted in 2014 based on the probable outcome, as applicable, of the awards as of the grant date, consistent with our estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For this purpose, the probable outcome was assumed to be at the target level attainment. We calculated the estimated fair value of (i) the RSUs and (ii) the PSUs with the performance condition tied to ROIC by using the closing price per share of our common stock on the grant date. The estimated fair value of the PSUs with the performance condition tied to RTSR was calculated using the simulated fair value per share of our common stock of $39.55 based on the application of a Monte Carlo simulation model.

The table below shows the grant date fair value of each of the RSUs and PSUs, which were granted to each of our named executive officers in 2014, based on such probable outcome, as applicable, as well as the value of the PSUs at the grant date assuming that the maximum level of the performance conditions (200% of target) will be achieved. Such maximum level is assumed only for the metric tied to ROIC. Under FASB ASC Topic 718, the RTSR metric applicable to a portion of the PSUs issued to our named executive officers in 2014 is a market condition and not a performance condition. Accordingly, there is not a grant date fair value below or in excess of the amounts reflected in the table above that could be calculated and disclosed based on achievement of market conditions.


Named Executive Officer	Grant Date Fair Value of 2014 RSUs ($)		Grant Date Fair Value of 2014 PSUs ($)		Value of 2014 PSUs at Maximum Performance Level ($) ^(a)
G. Kenny		1,921,583		2,232,522		3,193,312
B. Robinson		743,116		863,362		1,234,920
P. Campbell		384,257		446,435		638,563
R. Kenny		289,394		196,755		266,752
G. Lampert		743,116		863,362		1,234,920
E. Sabonnadiere		538,139		625,217		894,286
R. Siverd		486,745		565,507		808,881

^(a)

Represents the sum of (i) the grant date fair value of the portion of the PSU with the RTSR metric and (ii) the grant date value of the portion of the PSU with the ROIC metric assuming that the maximum level of the performance conditions (200% of target) will be achieved.

⁽⁴⁾

Represents awards paid under our AIP after the 2014 fiscal year with respect to that fiscal year’s performance. Mr. Sabonnadiere received a negotiated pro-rata amount of his target AIP bonus pursuant to his Separation Agreement, which was paid in Euros and converted into U.S. dollars for the purposes of this table and which is reported in the “All Other Compensation” column. Mr. Siverd forfeited his right to receive any payment under the AIP in connection with his retirement on July 1, 2014.

⁽⁵⁾	“All Other Compensation” column in 2014 included the following:


Name	Contributions to Retirement Plan and International Plan ($) ^(a)	Contributions to BEP ($) ^(b)	Perquisites ($) ^(c)	Value of Life Insurance Premiums ($) ^(d)
G. Kenny	15,600	48,375	35,000	4,356
B. Robinson	15,600	16,871	15,000	990
P. Campbell	23,625	—	228,125	—
R. Kenny	15,600	5,818	89,724	1,094
G. Lampert	15,600	16,583	15,000	990
E. Sabonnadiere	—	—	64,482	—
R. Siverd	15,600	772	12,500	4,513

^(a)

Represents contributions to our U.S.-based named executive officers under our Retirement Plan and to Mr. Campbell under the International Plan. Mr. Sabonnadiere did not receive benefits under these plans as he received statutory retirement benefits pursuant to French law, which are provided to all of our French employees.

^(b)

Represents contributions to our U.S.-based named executive officers under the BEP component of the DCP.

^(c)

Represents: (i) for each of Messrs. G. Kenny, Robinson, Lampert, and Siverd, the payment of a fixed payment perquisite; (ii) for Mr. Campbell, the payment of housing of $34,271; his children’s school tuition of $51,459; use of a company vehicle of $29,696; home leave travel expenses of $28,058; gross up on tax equalization of $83,540; and club dues of $1,101; (iii) for Mr. R. Kenny, the payment of housing of $28,793; relocation expenses of $47,542; use of a company vehicle of $3,485; home leave travel expenses of $3,565; and gross up on tax equalization of $6,339; and (iv) for Mr. Sabonnadiere, use of a company vehicle of $8,666 and tax preparation and legal fees of $55,816.

^(d)

Represents an amount of imputed income from Company provided life insurance coverage.

In addition, the “All Other Compensation” column includes the following payments to Mr. Sabonnadiere in connection with his transition from the Company effective August 1, 2014: severance payment of $781,211, pro-rata amount of his target bonus of $210,927, reimbursement of relocation expenses of $6,593 under the Separation Agreement described on page 65, and an aggregate consulting services payment of $177,602, pursuant to the Consulting Agreement described on page 65.

Narrative Disclosure for Summary Compensation Table

Certain aspects of the compensation and equity awards reported in this table are subject to terms and conditions set forth in policies and plans as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2014 Table

The following table details the grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers in 2014.


			Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards ⁽¹⁾			Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards ⁽²⁾
Name	Grant Date		Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	Threshold (#)	Target (#)	Maximum (#)	All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units⁽³⁾ (#)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($)⁽⁴⁾
G. Kenny			625,000	1,250,000	2,500,000
		2/13/14				—	64,310	—	—	1,921,583
		2/13/14				32,155	64,310	128,620	—	2,232,522
B. Robinson			230,000	460,000	920,000
		2/13/14				—	24,870	—	—	743,116
		2/13/14				12,435	24,870	49,470	—	863,362
P. Campbell			148,236	296,473	592,946
		2/13/14				—	12,860	—	—	384,257
		2/13/14				6,430	12,860	25,720	—	446,435
R. Kenny ⁽⁵⁾			29,531	59,063	88,594
			62,500	125,000	250,000
		2/13/14				—	—	—	5,000	149,400
		8/01/14				—	6,410	—	—	139,994
		8/01/14				3,205	6,410	12,820	—	196,775
G. Lampert			230,000	460,000	920,000
		2/13/14				—	24,870	—	—	743,116
		2/13/14				12,435	24,870	49,470	—	863,362
E. Sabonnadiere ⁽⁶⁾			161,147	322,293	644,586
		2/13/14				—	18,010	—	—	538,139
		2/13/14				9,005	18,010	36,020	—	625,217
R. Siverd ⁽⁷⁾			180,000	360,000	720,000
		2/13/14				—	16,290	—	—	486,745
		2/13/14				8,145	16,290	32,580	—	565,507

⁽¹⁾	Represents the potential 2014 AIP awards. Actual amounts earned by our named executive officers are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. See pages 40 - 46 for more information on the 2014 AIP awards, including the applicable performance conditions.

⁽²⁾	Represents RSUs and PSUs granted under the 2005 Plan. There are no threshold or maximum future payouts under the RSU awards. The RSUs and PSUs granted to named executive officers in 2014 are subject to vesting and performance conditions described on page 46 - 48.

⁽³⁾	Represents RSUs granted under the 2005 Plan that do not include performance conditions. Such RSUs vest pro-rata over three years on the anniversary of the date of grant beginning in 2015.

⁽⁴⁾

Represents the grant date fair value of awards determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See also Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, and Footnote 3 to the Summary Compensation Table above.

⁽⁵⁾

Mr. R. Kenny received non-equity incentive awards (i) under the North American Region Annual Incentive Plan tied to the results of North America (pro-rated in this table to reflect the seven months prior to his promotion effective August 1, 2014) and (ii) under the AIP tied to our global results (pro-rated in this table to reflect the five months after his promotion effective August 1, 2014).

⁽⁶⁾	Mr. Sabonnadiere received a negotiated pro-rata amount of his target AIP bonus and forfeited his RSU and PSU awards pursuant to his Separation Agreement described on page 65.

⁽⁷⁾	In connection with his retirement effective July 1, 2014, Mr. Siverd forfeited his right to receive any payment under the AIP and his RSU and PSU grants provide for pro-rata vesting, with such vesting determined at the end of their respective performance periods.

Narrative Disclosure for Grants of Plan Based Awards

See discussion at pages 40 - 48 for additional information related to our awards under the AIP and the 2005 Plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2014

The following table provides information with respect to outstanding awards held by each of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2014 on an award-by-award basis.


	OPTION AWARDS								STOCK AWARDS
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable⁽¹⁾		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have not Vested (#) ⁽³⁾		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have not Vested ($) ⁽⁴⁾		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)⁽³⁾			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) ⁽⁴⁾
G. Kenny		43,331		—		11.94		1/26/2015						20,000			298,000
		28,896		—		22.97		2/7/2016						17,000			253,300
		28,725		—		50.68		2/14/2017						28,000			417,200
		68,560		—		64.51		2/13/2018						24,000			357,600
		180,000		—		19.59		2/11/2019						42,874			638,823
		108,000		—		24.44		2/12/2020						32,155	⁽⁵⁾		479,110
		109,000		—		42.87		2/9/2021
		114,000		57,000		32.50		2/9/2022
		52,667		105,333		35.24		3/18/2023
B. Robinson		2,410		—		22.97		2/7/2016						6,000			89,400
		3,205		—		50.68		2/14/2017						24,000			357,600
		21,580		—		64.51		2/13/2018						8,000			119,200
		60,000		—		19.59		2/11/2019						9,000			134,100
		31,000		—		24.44		2/12/2020						16,580			247,042
		30,000		—		42.87		2/9/2021						12,435	⁽⁵⁾		185,282
		31,333		15,667		32.50		2/9/2022
		20,000		40,000		35.24		3/18/2023
P Campbell										3,350		49,915		8,574			127,753
										2,000		29,800		6,430	⁽⁵⁾		95,807
										23,000		342,700
R. Kenny		3,100		—		58.03		3/11/2018		4,500		67,050		4,273			63,668
										4,800		71,520		3,205	⁽⁵⁾		47,755
										5,000		74,500
G. Lampert		4,984		—		11.99		4/6/2015						6,000			89,400
		3,480		—		22.97		2/7/2016						5,000			74,500
		3,016		—		50.68		2/14/2017						8,000			119,200
		20,284		—		69.29		11/5/2017						9,000			134,100
		60,000		—		19.59		2/11/2019						16,580			247,042
		31,000		—		24.44		2/12/2020						12,435	⁽⁵⁾		185,282
		30,000		—		42.87		2/9/2021
		31,333		15,667		32.50		2/9/2022
		20,000		40,000		35.24		3/18/2023
E. Sabonnadiere ⁽²⁾		48,497		—		27.64		1/27/2015
R. Siverd ⁽²⁾		6,260		—		50.68		2/14/2017						2,262			33,704
		17,000		—		64.51		7/1/2017						1,358	⁽⁵⁾		20,234
		60,000		—		19.59		7/1/2017
		23,456		—		24.44		7/1/2017
		23,000		—		42.87		7/1/2017
		27,333		—		32.50		7/1/2017
		13,667		—		35.24		7/1/2017

⁽¹⁾	Unvested stock options vest ratably over three years except the grants expiring February 9, 2021, which vest three (3) years from the date of grant.

⁽²⁾

In connection with Mr. Sabonnadiere’s transition from the Company, Mr. Sabonnadiere forfeited his unvested RSUs and PSUs and the exercise period of his exercisable options was changed to January 27, 2015. In connection with Mr. Siverd’s retirement, (i) Mr. Siverd’s unvested options were forfeited; (ii) the exercise period of Mr. Siverd’s vested options was changed to the earlier of three years after retirement or the applicable expiration date; (iii) Mr. Siverd’s restricted stock and RSUs granted prior to 2014 vested pro-rata; and (iv) Mr. Siverd’s RSUs and PSUs granted in 2014 have been adjusted to reflect pro-rata amounts which could be issued at the end of the performance period.

⁽³⁾	The vesting schedule for restricted stock, RSUs and PSUs that have not vested is as follows:

Name

Grant Date

Unvested Shares/Units

Vesting Schedule

G. Kenny

2/12/2010

20,000

^(a

⁾

2/9/2011

17,000

^(b

⁾

2/9/2012

28,000

^(b

⁾

3/18/2013

24,000

^(b

⁾

2/13/2014

42,874

^(c

⁾

2/13/2014

32,155

^(d

⁾

B. Robinson

2/12/2010

6,000

^(a

⁾

2/9/2011

24,000

^(b

⁾

2/9/2012

8,000

^(b

⁾

3/18/2013

9,000

^(b

⁾

2/13/2014

16,580

^(c

⁾

2/13/2014

12,435

^(d

⁾

P. Campbell

9/30/2010

3,350

^(e

⁾

2/9/2012

2,000

^(g

⁾

12/17/2012

23,000

^(e

⁾

2/13/2014

8,574

^(c

⁾

2/13/2014

6,430