e6vk
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
August 1, 2008
QIMONDA AG
Gustav-Heinemann-Ring 212
D-81739 Munich
Federal Republic of Germany
Tel: +49-89-60088-0
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-___.
This Report on Form 6-K is incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form F-3,
File No. 333-145983.
Explanatory Note
This Report
on Form 6-K contains the quarterly report for the third financial quarter ended
June 30, 2008 of Qimonda AG dated August 1, 2008 and is hereby incorporated by reference into our
Registration Statement on Form F-3, Registration No. 333-145983.
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERLY REPORT
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2008
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
42
|
i
(This page is intentionally left blank)
OVERVIEW OF
FINANCIAL RESULTS
Three And Nine
Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared To Three And Nine
Months Ended June 30, 2007
Results of
Operations
Net
Sales
The following table presents data on our net sales for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange over prior period
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
(7%
|
)
|
|
|
(17%
|
)
|
|
|
(8%
|
)
|
|
|
(15%
|
)
|
Our net sales in the nine months ended June 30, 2008
decreased by 1,588 million, or 55%, from
2,897 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2007 to 1,309 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
an average price decline of 63% for our DRAM products;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in our non-PC bit shipment share from 52% to
49%; and
|
|
|
|
exchange rate effects due to a weakening of the U.S. dollar
compared to the euro of 15%.
|
These decreasing effects was offset in part by:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in bit shipments of 41%.
|
Average price decline. In the 2007 calendar
year, we have experienced a sharp decline of market prices (for
512Mb DDR2 memories in particular) with prices falling by more
than 80%. Despite the continued oversupply market situation, the
price remained stable at a low level in the three months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008. This was caused by higher DRAM demand
across different applications especially from the PC industry,
which has absorbed a significant portion of the oversupply in
the industry (albeit at low prices). DRAM bit production growth
in the industry persisted due to productivity increases as
manufacturers employed increasingly efficient technologies.
Overall the average selling prices of our DRAM products were 63%
lower in the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to
the nine months ended June 30, 2007.
We continue to expect that prices for standard DRAM products
will decline over time across the industry as a whole. Such
declines can be severe, as we experienced in calendar year 2007.
We intend to continue to follow our strategy to mitigate the
impact of declining prices by reducing our costs on a per unit
basis and continuing to diversify our product mix.
Decrease in non-PC bit shipments. In the nine
months ended June 30, 2008, 49% of our total bit shipments
were for use in non-PC applications compared to 52% for the nine
months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in our non-PC
share was mainly due to increased shipments in the PC market in
the first two quarters to meet the strong PC market demand
growth.
Exchange rate effects. The U.S. dollar
weakened against the euro in the first nine months of the 2008
financial year, with the average exchange rate for the period
being 15% lower than for the corresponding period of our 2007
financial year. This unfavorable U.S. dollar to euro
exchange rate negatively affected our revenues during the nine
months ended June 30, 2008. We have calculated the effects
of this translation risk as follows: we would have achieved
190 million more in net sales in the nine months
ended June 30, 2008, had the average exchange rates we used
to translate our U.S. dollar denominated sales into euro
been the same in the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as
they were in the nine months ended June 30, 2007. For the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2007 the negative impact on sales
amounted to 64 million.
Increase in bit shipments. Our bit shipments
increased by 41% during the nine months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2007, due to
increasing manufacturing output.
1
Demand for our products was especially high in the PC market, as
PC manufacturers increased the amount of DRAM included in each
system (or bits per box) in the current low price
environment. As of June 30, 2008, 89% of our capacities
were converted to the 80nm and below technology nodes, compared
to less than 22% as of June 30, 2007.
Net Sales by
Region
The following table sets forth our sales by region for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
8%
|
Rest of Europe
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
9%
|
North America
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
33%
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
33%
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
41%
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
38%
|
Japan
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The relative increase in the share of sales in Asia/Pacific and
decrease in North America during the nine months ended
June 30, 2008 was mainly caused by Original Equipment
Manufacturer (OEM) customers relocating their
production to Asia.
For practical purpose, the Rest of Europe region also includes
other countries and territories in the rest of the world outside
of the listed main geographic regions with aggregate sales
representing no more than 1% of total sales in any period.
Cost of Goods
Sold and Gross Margin
The following table sets forth our cost of goods sold and
related data for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
(964
|
)
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
|
|
(2,572
|
)
|
|
|
(2,151
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
130%
|
|
|
|
149%
|
|
|
|
89%
|
|
|
|
164%
|
|
Gross margin (loss)
|
|
|
(30%
|
)
|
|
|
(49%
|
)
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
(64%
|
)
|
Cost of goods sold decreased by 421 million, or 16%,
from 2,572 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2007 to 2,151 million in the nine
months ended June 30, 2008. As a percentage of net sales,
cost of goods sold increased from 89% to 164% over the same
period. The absolute decrease in our cost of goods sold was due
primarily to:
|
|
|
|
|
improvements in our productivity;
|
|
|
|
reduced purchase prices from our joint ventures and foundries;
|
|
|
|
positive impacts from exchange rate effects; and
|
|
|
|
lower inventory write-downs.
|
These decreasing effects were offset in part by:
|
|
|
|
|
a 41% increase in bit shipments.
|
Improvements in productivity. Similar to our
2007 financial year, we achieved productivity improvements
through converting our capacities to 80nm and 75nm process
technologies and increasing the percentage of our chips produced
on 300mm wafers. We had converted almost 90% of our
capacities to 80nm and 75nm at June 30, 2008. As previously
announced, to improve our productivity we are actively phasing
out the purchase of 200mm wafers from Infineon Dresden and are
reducing our 200mm production capacity in Richmond. Measured in
wafer starts, 85% of our total production (including capacity
sourced from our strategic and foundry partners) was on 300mm
wafers in the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as compared
to 73% of our production in the nine months ended June 30,
2007. We believe that productivity improvements, together with a
larger sales volume over which our fixed costs are
2
spread, permitted us to achieve a lower percentage increase in
costs as compared to the percentage increase in bit shipments.
As of June 30, 2008, 89% of our capacities were converted
to the 80nm and below technology nodes, compared to less than
22% as of June 30, 2007. Other DRAM suppliers have been
converting their capacities to smaller feature sizes very
aggressively during the past few quarters and thus we have
implemented measures to accelerate our conversion.
Reduced purchase prices from joint ventures and
foundries. Cost of goods sold includes the cost
of inventory purchased from our joint ventures, such as Inotera,
and other associated and related companies as well as our
foundry partners Winbond, SMIC and Infineon Dresden. During the
three months ended June 30, 2008, we completely phased out
external capacities related to SMIC and Infineon Dresden. Our
purchases from joint ventures and foundries amounted to
566 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2008 as compared to 974 million in the nine months
ended June 30, 2007. Even though our purchases from these
entities declined in absolute amounts as a result of the
significant decline in DRAM prices, we increased the percentage
of total bit shipments purchased from these partners increased
to 65% in the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as compared
to 58% during the nine months ended June 30, 2007.
Positive impacts from exchange rate
effects. The decline in the exchange rate of
other currencies against the euro in the nine months ended
June 30, 2008, as compared to the equivalent period one
year earlier, decreased the euro value of our costs that are
denominated in other currencies, mainly the U.S. dollar, by
approximately 219 million. This means that we would
have incurred approximately 219 million more in costs
of goods sold in our nine months ended June 30, 2008, had
the average exchange rates we used to translate our non-euro
expenses into euro been the same in the nine months ended
June 30, 2008 as they were in the nine months ended
June 30, 2007. However, considered together with the
decrease in our net sales due to negative foreign exchange
effects in the amount of 190 million, foreign
currency movements overall only had a net positive effect of
29 million on our gross margin during the nine months
ended June 30, 2008. For the three months ended
June 30, 2008 the positive exchange rate impact on our
costs of goods sold was 78 million compared to the
respective quarter in financial year 2007. Considering the
negative exchange rate impact of 64 million on net
sales in the three months ended June 30, 2008 there would
have been a net positive effect of 14 million on
gross margin if the U.S. dollar to euro exchange rate would
have remained on the same level since June 30, 2007.
Lower inventory write-downs. We value our
inventory on a quarterly basis at the lower of cost or market
value. If the market price declines below the full production
cost of a particular product group, then all inventories of that
product group are written down to the market price. Due to the
significant price decline (especially during the first three
months of the current financial year), we recorded write-downs
on inventory in an amount of 72 million for the nine
months ended June 30, 2008 in accordance with our policy.
In the comparable period of our 2007 financial year we recorded
write-downs on inventory in an amount of 91 million.
The lower level of write-downs in the nine months ended
June 30, 2008 as compared to the nine months ended
June 30, 2007 is due to a reduction in our manufacturing
costs and a recovery in sales prices experienced in the three
months ended June 30, 2008. Due to the volatility of the
DRAM market, write-downs of this nature may occur in future
periods of sharp price decline.
Increase in bit shipments. The 41% increase in
bit shipments in the nine months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was
primarily enabled by continued production growth at our Richmond
300mm facility and higher purchase volumes from foundries and
joint ventures. In response to the low price levels, PC
manufacturers continued to increase the quantities of DRAMs that
were installed per system, which absorbed a significant portion
of the oversupply in the industry.
Our gross margin fell to a negative 64% during the nine months
ended June 30, 2008, from a positive 11% in the nine months
ended June 30, 2007. This was primarily due to immensely
lower average selling prices, which could not be compensated by
lower production costs per unit resulting from increased
manufacturing productivity and lower purchase prices from
foundry partners. In the third quarter of our 2008 financial
year our gross margin improved to negative 49% as compared to a
negative 58% in the second quarter of our 2008 financial year.
This improvement resulted mainly from continuing productivity
improvements, reduced foundry purchases which offset in part the
effect of lower sales and a 37 million positive
effect from reduced inventory write-downs due to increasing
price levels for standard DRAMs during the third quarter of our
2008 financial year.
While average selling prices, especially for standard DRAM
products, generally decline over time, they can exhibit
significant volatility from period to period. Our gross margin
suffers in periods, such as the first nine months of our 2008
financial year, in which prices have declined faster than we can
reduce our
3
unit costs. Conversely, our gross margin is stronger during
periods when prices decrease more slowly or increase, such as at
the end of our 2006 financial year.
Research and
Development (R&D) Expenses
The following table sets forth our R&D expenses for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
In the nine months ended June 30, 2008, research and
development expenses increased by 12% to 326 million
from 291 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2007. This was principally due to our efforts to
strengthen our development of capabilities with respect to the
next generation of memory technologies to further diversify our
portfolio of memory products as well as with respect to
non-volatile memory technologies. In the nine months ended
June 30, 2007, our research and development expenses were
low due to the substantial completion of technology development
for 80nm and 75nm during September and October 2006,
respectively.
In February 2008 we announced the development of our new
innovative Buried Wordline DRAM technology, which is aimed at
reducing the cell size of our DRAM products towards
4F2
over the next several years, consistent with our views on the
progression of the industry, while at the same time meeting
customer requirements regarding high performance and low power
consumption. This new architecture combines a variety of
innovations at the cell and wiring levels, and we are currently
expending additional R&D efforts to introduce it in initial
product designs. We plan to introduce this technology initially
in 65nm technologies and to begin production of a 1 Gbit DDR2 in
the second half of the 2008 calendar year. Because the degree of
innovation, testing and other development work that is involved
with the progression to this new architecture exceeds that
required for the reductions in the feature sizes that we have
implemented in recent technology generations, we may be unable
to meet our goals or to keep pace with the rate of development
in the industry in a timely manner or at all, or do so at
competitive costs. In addition, the increased R&D work in
which we are currently engaged and expect to continue with in
the coming financial periods will add to demands for capital.
See Liquidity Capital Requirements.
In the third quarter, Qimonda and Elpida signed final contracts
for a strategic technology partnership for the joint development
of memory chips. They plan to jointly develop technology
platforms and design rules drawing on both their technologies.
Specifically, the companies target to introduce a jointly
developed innovative
4F2
cell concept in the 40nm generation already in 2010 and to
subsequently scale it to the 30nm generation. The companies have
established a broad cross licensing of intellectual property.
Additionally, they are in the process of finalizing discussions
on further joint activities in the areas of product and
technology development as well as joint manufacturing.
Selling,
General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
The following table sets forth information on our selling,
general and administrative expenses for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased by 1% as compared
to the same period in the prior year. The increase as a
percentage of sales was mainly attributable to the decrease in
sales compared to the prior year.
4
Restructuring
Expenses
The following table sets forth information on our restructuring
expenses for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
3%
|
|
Our restructuring expenses comprise four measures: The
relocation of the backend production in Malaysia from Malacca to
Senai (Johor) near Singapore, the phase-out of the 200mm wafer
supply from Infineons manufacturing facility in Dresden,
the combination of our research centers in North America and a
comprehensive cost reduction program.
In March 2007 we announced our intention to relocate our backend
production in Malaysia from our existing facility in Malacca to
a new backend production facility in Senai (Johor) near
Singapore by December 2008. Following the move, the existing
site in Malacca is to be completely closed and the remaining
employees are to be laid off. During the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2008 we accrued 0 million and
4 million for severance payments for
631 employees, respectively.
Furthermore, as part of our focus to improve profitability and
300mm manufacturing, we terminated our wafer purchase contract
with Infineon. Our purchases of wafers from Infineon Dresden had
been completely phased out by the end of May 2008. Under the
terms of the contract with Infineon, we had agreed to indemnify
Infineon for 50% of the restructuring costs that Infineon will
incur in connection with the termination of this contract. As a
result of the termination, we incurred 1 million and
11 million during the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, for the reimbursement
obligation to Infineon. In addition, cost of goods sold includes
losses related to purchase commitments for 200mm wafer contract
manufacturing at Infineon Dresden in the amount of
3 million and 33 million for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Infineon and
we are presently discussing additional reimbursements to
Infineon from us in respect of idle costs at Infineon Dresden,
which have not been incurred or accrued as of June 30, 2008.
Due to continued efforts to improve costs and efficiencies, we
decided to consolidate our U.S. research and development
facilities into a single development center located in Raleigh,
North Carolina. As a result, our development center in
Burlington, Vermont, was closed by the end of June 2008. We
accrued restructuring costs of 0 million and
4 million during the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, relating to lease termination
costs and expected severance payments for 108 employees.
On April 21, 2008 management announced a comprehensive cost
reduction program designed to adjust our cost structure and
lower our breakeven point. We target 180 million in
annualized cost reductions compared to the current cost
structure. These cost reductions are based on a combination of
reducing workforce in the range of 10% on a worldwide basis and
cutting recurring costs. This includes a reduction in
nonvolatile memory development to basic research activities and
the termination of the related agreement with Macronix. We
expect to realize these savings in full starting in the 2009
financial year and to have accrued for any restructuring charges
relating to this program by the end of the 2008 financial year.
During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, we
incurred restructuring expenses in an amount of
19 million for each period. For the fourth quarter,
we expect to record about 10 million in additional
restructuring charges related to these cost reduction
initiatives.
Goodwill and
Long-lived Assets Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
(0
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
5%
|
|
5
Due to the decline in our share price and the general weakness
in pricing for DRAM products we tested the goodwill recorded on
our balance sheet for impairment at March 31, 2008 in
accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. As a result of our fair value
analysis as of March 31, 2008, we determined that the
carrying value of the goodwill exceeded the implied fair value
of zero. Accordingly, during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 we charged 61 million to the
income statement to write off the existing goodwill in full.
Due to our operating loss and cash outflow, we are required in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets to analyze
whether the carrying values of our long-lived assets are
recoverable or reduce those values through impairment charges if
they are not. We assessed our long-lived assets for impairment
as of June 30, 2008, and determined that our long-lived
assets are recoverable. As a result of the protracted downturn
in the DRAM industry and the recent sharp decline in our share
price, our independent auditors have requested an independent
valuation in order to finally conclude on our assessment of
recoverability. We intend to conclude this valuation by
September 30, 2008.
If the result of the valuation is a conclusion that the value of
our long-lived assets is lower than their carrying values, we
will be required to write down their carrying values. A
write-down of this nature could be material. In addition, a
write-down may affect our compliance with financial covenants
requiring us to maintain prescribed levels of debt to equity.
This would require us to seek to renegotiate these covenants,
refinance the affected financing obligations or risk breach of
these covenants and repayment of the related financing
obligations of 40 million as of June 30, 2008.
Other
Operating Income, Net
The following table sets forth information on our other
operating (expense) income, net for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Other operating income, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
1%
|
Other operating income, net contains various items related to
our operations, and may fluctuate from period to period due to
the more or less infrequent nature of these items, which include
subsidies, grants, insurance proceeds and accruals for legal
matters. No material items of this nature were incurred in the
nine months ended June 30, 2007 as well as in the nine
months ended June 30, 2008.
Equity in
Earnings (loss) of Associated Companies
The following table sets forth information on our equity in
earnings (loss) of associated companies for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of associated companies
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
(8%
|
)
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
(3%
|
)
|
The equity in earnings (loss) of associated companies with
financial year-ends that differ by not more than three months
from the Companys financial year-end is recorded with a
three-month delay. This applies in particular to our joint
venture Inotera Memories, which has a December 31 financial
year-end. Market price fluctuations during the three months
ended June 30, 2008 would, to the extent these impact
Inoteras results, affect our equity in Inoteras
earnings (loss) during the three months ending
September 30, 2008.
In both periods, Inotera contributed most of our equity in
earnings (loss) from associated companies, which decreased to a
loss in the three months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due
to lower selling prices in the three months ended March 31,
2008. Our equity in Inoteras earnings (loss) is, however,
sensitive not
6
only to fluctuations in the price of DRAM and production
volumes, but also to changes in the portion of our inventory
which we purchased from Inotera and that remains unsold. This is
because we eliminate Inoteras profit from the inventory we
have not yet sold.
Loss on
Associated Company Share Issuance
The following table sets forth information on our loss on
associated company share issuance for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Loss on associated company share issuance
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
(1%
|
)
|
On August 20, 2007 Inotera issued 40 million common
shares, representing 1.2% of its outstanding share capital, as
bonuses to its employees. This diluted our ownership interest to
35.6%, which amounted to a loss of 7 million in the
nine months ended June 30, 2008.
Other
Non-Operating Income, Net
The following table sets forth information on other
non-operating income for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Other non-operating income (expense), net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
7
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
1%
|
Other non-operating income, net consists of various items from
period to period not directly related to our principal
operations, including gains and losses on sales of marketable
securities. In the nine months ended June 30, 2008, other
non-operating income related primarily to an increase in the
valuation of derivatives and gains and losses on sales of
marketable securities, whereas in the nine months ended
June 30, 2007, other non-operating income related
principally to foreign currency transaction gains as well as a
gain in the amount of 2 million on the sale of our
investment in Ramtron.
Earnings
(Loss) Before Interest and Taxes
(EBIT)
EBIT is a non-GAAP financial measure which is determined from
our consolidated statements of operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
Add: interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
Add: income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(1,444
|
)
|
7
Interest
Income (Expense), Net
The following table sets forth information on our net interest
income (expense) for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
(2%
|
)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
(1%
|
)
|
Interest expense mainly relates to interest on our sale and
lease back transactions and convertible notes, which is offset
by interest income we earn on cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities.
Income
Taxes
Income tax expense for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
% of net sales
|
|
|
(14%
|
)
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
2%
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
|
(2%
|
)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
(2%
|
)
|
On August 17, 2007, the Business Tax Reform Act of 2008 was
enacted in Germany. This bill introduces several changes to the
taxation of German business activities, including a reduction of
the combined corporate and trade tax rate in Germany from
approximately 39% to 30%. Most of the changes apply to the
Company effective October 1, 2007 and affect the
Companys current tax rate from that date.
In the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008,
our effective tax rate was lower than the combined German
statutory tax rate of 39% and 30%, respectively. This resulted
primarily from income in jurisdictions with lower than average
corporate tax rates, the utilization of tax credits, and the
recording of additional valuation allowances against current
period deferred tax benefits arising in connection with the
operating losses in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2008. Despite the consolidated pretax loss, we
generated taxable income in some tax jurisdictions which
resulted in the negative effective tax rate during the nine
months ended June 30, 2008.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 109 Accounting for
Income Taxes, we have assessed our deferred tax asset
and the need for a valuation allowance. The assessment was based
on the benefits that could be realized from available tax
strategies, forecasted future taxable income to the extent
applicable, and the reversal of temporary differences in future
periods. As a result of this assessment, we increased our
deferred tax asset valuation allowance as of June 30, 2008
to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount that is more
likely than not expected to be realized in future. Changes in
valuation allowance attributable to prior year tax credits in
the amounts of 0 million and 10 million
were recorded for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2008, respectively.
Net Income
(Loss)
We had a net loss of 1,481 million in the nine months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to a net income of
16 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2007. In the three months ended June 30, 2008 our net loss
amounted to 401 million, compared to a net loss of
482 million in the three months ended March 31,
2008.
8
Financial
Condition
The following table sets forth selected items from our
consolidated balance sheets for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(in millions, except
|
|
%
|
|
|
percentages)
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
2,257
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
(41%
|
)
|
Non-Current assets
|
|
|
3,124
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
(16%
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,381
|
|
|
3,958
|
|
|
(26%
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
1%
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
(45%
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, our current assets decreased
significantly as compared to September 30, 2007 mainly due
to lower inventories, lower cash and cash equivalents, lower
trade accounts receivables, lower marketable securities and
lower other current assets. Inventories decreased as a result of
lower gross inventories and higher inventory write-downs due to
market price decline in the nine months ended June 30, 2008
compared to September 30, 2007. Trade accounts receivables
decreased in the nine months ended June 30, 2008 primarily
due to lower sales. As of June 30, 2008, non-current assets
decreased compared to September 30, 2007 principally due to
lower property, plant and equipment, lower long-term investments
and lower intangible assets. Property, plant and equipment
decreased primarily because our capital expenditures were lower
than our depreciation expenses. The decrease of intangible
assets is attributable to the write-off of goodwill in the
amount of 61 million as described above under
Results of operations Goodwill and Long-lived
Assets Impairment.
As of June 30, 2008, current liabilities increased slightly
compared to September 30, 2007 principally due to higher
short-term debt and higher other current liabilities, offset by
lower trade accounts payable. Trade accounts payable mainly
decreased as a result of lower capital expenditures in the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2007. Short-term debt increased
compared to September 30, 2007 mainly due to higher
short-term portions of long-term debt and our sale and leaseback
transactions. As of June 30, 2008, non-current liabilities
increased compared to September 30, 2007 principally due to
increased long-term debt as a result of our sale and leaseback
transactions and the issuance of our convertible bond.
As of June 30, 2008, our shareholders equity
decreased to 1,925 million, primarily due to our net
loss of 1,481 million incurred during the nine months
ended June 30, 2008, as well as foreign currency
translation losses affecting equity in the amount of
100 million.
Liquidity
Cash
Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
242
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Our operating cash flow decreased significantly from an inflow
of 769 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2007 to an outflow of 423 million in the nine months
ended June 30, 2008. This was mainly caused by our net loss
of 1,481 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2008, which in turn was largely a result of lower
net sales due to the strong decline in our average selling
prices as compared to the
9
previous year. Operating cash flow was also negatively impacted
by the higher decrease in our trade accounts payable balance
during the nine months ended June 30, 2008, with the value
of our trade payables following selling prices down. These
negative impacts on our operating cash flow were partly offset
by working capital improvements resulting from the decrease in
our inventories and trade accounts receivable due to falling
prices and our working capital management efforts.
Cash used in investing activities decreased substantially from
an outflow of 724 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2007 to an outflow of 41 million in the
nine months ended June 30, 2008. This was principally due
to lower capital expenditures (a reduction of
283 million), lower investment in marketable
securities (a reduction of 256 million) and the
execution of our sale and lease back transactions (a
contribution of 154 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2008).
Cash provided by financing activities during the nine months
ended June 30, 2008 refers mainly to the issuance of our
convertible bond, from which we raised 168 million, a
prepayment agreement with a customer to secure supply, and a
drawing of 40 million under a long-term loan
agreement. During the nine months ended June 30, 2007, cash
used in financing activities refers principally to the repayment
of 344 million of short-term debt to Infineon.
The 40 million drawn under the long-term loan
agreement must be repaid by July 31, 2009. This loan
agreement and other contracts to which we are a party including
the prepayment agreements we have entered into with some
customers contain covenants customary for such transactions and
that relate to our financial performance. We were in compliance
with all such covenants at June 30, 2008.
Free Cash
Flow
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure which is
determined from our consolidated statements of cash flows as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Purchases of (proceeds from) marketable securities, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our free cash flow in the nine months ended June 30, 2008,
was negative primarily due to our currently non-profitable
operations and capital expenditures that were higher than our
proceeds from sales of marketable securities and sale and
leaseback transactions.
Our free cash flow was positive in the three months ended
June 30, 2007 mainly due to our profitable operations
during that timeframe and capital expenditures that were lower
than cash provided from operating activities.
Capital
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
318
|
Our capital expenditures for the nine months ended June 30,
2008, consisted primarily of equipment for the technology
conversion at our 300mm facility in Richmond, Virginia and for
our 300mm R&D facility in Dresden.
We target capital expenditures for the 2008 financial year in a
range of 370 million to 420 million.
Furthermore, as part of our conversion to Buried Wordline
technology we anticipate investing an additional
100 million over the course of our 2009 and 2010
financial years.
Capital
Requirements
We had aggregate cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale
marketable securities as of June 30, 2008 in the amount of
630 million, which we refer to as our gross cash
position, compared to
10
1,011 million as of September 30, 2007. As of
June 30, 2008 we had short-term debt obligations of
193 million payable within one year. Our total short
and long-term debt amounted to 631 million as of
June 30, 2008, which represents 33% of our
shareholders equity as of that date. We therefore believe
that our capital structure provides us with flexibility to
obtain financing suitable to our business, such as the sale and
lease back transactions we have recently executed despite
difficult global financial market conditions.
We are exploring a wide range of potential sources of capital,
including capital market transactions, debt financing, the
leveraging of selected assets and ventures with third parties.
To the extent our performance remains at current levels or
deteriorates further, which we view to a substantial extent as
dependent on price developments for DRAM products, we may have
difficulty obtaining capital.
Recent
Developments
On July 8, 2008, we decided to close down our design
centers at our Italian subsidiarys sites in Padua and
Milan by the end of 2008. We estimate that the restructuring
expenses in connection with these closures amount to about
5 million and will be incurred in the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. The expenses relate to the termination
of employees and the cancellation of rental contracts.
On July 14, 2008, Qimonda North America reached a tentative
agreement with Technology Park to settle all claims and disputes
related to the complaint regarding the lease in Vermont and
plans to finalize a written agreement shortly.
On July 17, 2008 the remaining shares of Inotera held by
Infineon were transferred to us. This completed the legal
transfer of all Inotera shares from Infineon to us.
On July 17, 2008 the plaintiffs in the Quebec antitrust
action, whose motion for authorization (certification) was
dismissed by the Quebec Superior Court in June 2008, filed
an appeal against this court decision.
Outlook for the
Fourth Quarter of our 2008 Financial Year and the 2009 Financial
Year
For the fourth quarter of financial year 2008, we expect our bit
production to increase by over 20% compared to the third
quarter, due to conversion to 75nm and improved yields. We
continue to target an increase in our bit production for
financial year 2008 of 20% to 30%.
For financial year 2008, we continue to expect bit demand for
DRAM to be driven by continued solid growth in servers, consumer
and communication applications and the move to higher density
modules in the PC market. In general, we expect a slow down of
supply growth in the market, as expected by independent market
researchers, eventually leading to a more balanced supply and
demand situation.
For the full financial year 2008, we expect to record a share of
bit-shipments for use in non-PC applications of slightly below
50% compared to the original target of more than 50%, due to the
strong growth in productivity and bit-production for standard
products in the fourth quarter.
We have further reduced our financial year 2008 capital
expenditures spending plan to a range of between
370 million and 420 million. We expect our
depreciation and amortization charges, without taking into
account the write off of goodwill taken in the second quarter,
to be between 600 million and 650 million
for financial year 2008, compared to our previous expectations
of between 650 million and 750 million.
This is due to the lower level of capital spending.
For our 2009 financial year, we are currently targeting R&D
expenses of between 360 million and
390 million and SG&A expenses of between
160 million and 180 million.
Based primarily on the further productivity improvements we
expect to achieve at our in-house and external foundry
capacities, and taking into account the reductions we have made
in our external foundry capacities, we are currently targeting
bit-production growth of between 30 and 40% compared to
financial year 2008. For our 2009 financial year, we target a
share of bit-shipments for use in non-PC applications of more
than 50%.
11
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
(in millions, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
()
|
|
|
()
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Net sales to third parties
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(964
|
)
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
|
|
(901
|
)
|
|
|
Gross loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Other operating income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of associated companies
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Other non-operating income, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
(631
|
)
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
|
(1.84
|
)
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
12
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
For the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
(in millions, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
()
|
|
|
()
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Net sales to third parties
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
2,061
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,572
|
)
|
|
|
(2,151
|
)
|
|
|
(3,387
|
)
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(842
|
)
|
|
|
(1,326
|
)
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Other operating income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(1,397
|
)
|
|
|
(2,200
|
)
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of associated companies
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
Loss on associated company share issuance
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Other non-operating income, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(1,455
|
)
|
|
|
(2,291
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
|
|
(2,332
|
)
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(4.33
|
)
|
|
|
(6.82
|
)
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
13
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
As of September 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,257
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
|
|
2,962
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,381
|
|
|
|
3,958
|
|
|
|
6,233
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
12, 15
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Long-term accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary share capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,117
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(1,506
|
)
|
|
|
(2,371
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,381
|
|
|
|
3,958
|
|
|
|
6,233
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
14
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
For the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued Ordinary shares
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
(accumulated
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
deficit)
|
|
|
(loss) income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
3,097
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
Contribution by Infineon
|
|
|
1, 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
3,113
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
3,808
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
3,117
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
(1,506
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
15
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
For the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
|
|
(2,332
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Gain on sales of business interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sales of long-term assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Equity in (earnings) loss of associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Loss on associate company share issuance
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Due to changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
|
|
(666
|
)
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of business interests and dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(601
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of long-term assets
|
|
|
12, 15
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in short-term debt due Infineon
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in short-term debt due third parties
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Repayments of short-term debt due third parties
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
Decrease in financial payables due related parties
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
Principal repayments under capital lease obligations
|
|
|
12, 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Dividend payments to minority shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Contribution by and advances from Infineon
|
|
|
1, 19
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
16
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
|
|
1.
|
Description of
Business, Formation and Basis of Presentation
|
Description of
Business
Qimonda AG and its subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company or Qimonda) is one of the
worlds leading suppliers of semiconductor memory products.
Qimonda designs memory technologies and develops, manufactures,
markets and sells a large variety of memory products on a
module, component and chip level. Qimonda has operations,
investments and customers located mainly in Europe, Asia and
North America. The Company is a majority-owned subsidiary of
Infineon Technologies AG and its subsidiaries
(Infineon). The financial year-end for the Company
is September 30.
Formation
Effective May 1, 2006, substantially all the memory
products-related assets and liabilities, operations and
activities of Infineon (the Memory Products
business) were contributed to the Company (the
Formation). In conjunction with the Formation the
Company entered into a contribution agreement and various other
service agreements with Infineon (notes 16 and 19).
At the Formation certain of the Companys operations and
investments that could not be directly transferred were
initially held in trust for Qimondas benefit by Infineon
until the legal transfer to Qimonda could take place. Pursuant
to agreements entered into on December 14, 2007
Infineons investments in Advanced Mask Technology Center
GmbH & Co. (AMTC) and Maskhouse Building
Administration GmbH & Co. KG (BAC) were
transferred to Qimonda subject to registration in the commercial
register. On January 11, 2008 the legal transfer from
Infineon of the Companys interest in AMTC became effective
with the entry in the commercial register. Similarly, on
January 21, 2008 the legal transfer from Infineon of the
Companys interest in BAC became effective with the entry
in the commercial register. The accompanying financial
statements include the results of operations of these activities
for all periods presented.
Basis of
Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as
of and for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007
and 2008 have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP). The accompanying financial statements are
condensed, because certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in annual financial statements have been
condensed or omitted. In addition, the condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2007 was derived from
audited financial statements and condensed for comparative
purposes, but does not include all disclosures required by
U.S. GAAP. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements contain all
adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position,
results of operations and cash flows of the interim periods
presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of results for the full financial year.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited combined and
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
September 30, 2007. The accounting policies applied in
preparing the accompanying condensed financial statements are
consistent with those for the year ended September 30, 2007
(note 2).
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates
the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and
commitments in the normal course of business. The Companys
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going
concern. The Company continues to execute its strategy and
business plan which are aimed at supporting continued growth and
improving profitability. As part of this plan, the Company has
implemented a cost reduction program (note 3) and is
accelerating its technology conversion to further increase
productivity in manufacturing. In addition the Company has
recently raised additional funds, e.g. through sale and
leaseback transactions (note 12), and seeks to utilize
suitable financing opportunities.
All amounts herein are shown in millions of euro (or
) except where otherwise stated. The
accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 and the
statements of operations and cash flows
17
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
for the periods then ended are also presented in
U.S. dollars ($), solely for the convenience of
the reader, at the rate of 1 = $1.5748, the Federal
Reserve noon buying rate on June 30, 2008.
Certain amounts in prior period condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes have been reclassified to conform to the
current period presentation. Intangible assets, pension
liabilities and minority interest are presented separately on
the Companys balance sheet. The Companys
consolidated results of operations, financial position or
overall cash flows have not been affected by these
reclassifications.
Estimates
The preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, as well as disclosure of contingent amounts and
liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods
presented. Actual results could differ materially from such
estimates made by management.
|
|
2.
|
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
|
Adopted in the
financial year beginning October 1, 2007
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48) which defines the threshold for
recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the
financial statements as more-likely-than-not to be
sustained by the taxing authority. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on the de-recognition measurement and classification of
income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and
penalties. FIN 48 also includes guidance concerning
accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods and
increases the level of disclosures associated with any recorded
income tax uncertainties. The Company adopted FIN 48
beginning October 1, 2007 (note 4).
Issued since
October 1, 2007 but principally applicable in future
financial years
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R)
Business Combinations.
SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141
Business Combinations and requires the
acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction even
if the business is not acquired by 100% by the acquirer. The
revised statement establishes the acquisition-date fair value as
the measurement objective for all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. Further major differences to the current
accounting practices are the definition of a
business, the shift from the purchase method to the
acquisition method, a changed treatment of acquisition and
restructuring costs related to the acquirement and the
recognition of contingent assets, contingent liabilities and
contingent considerations. The new SFAS No. 141(R)
will be effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact on its results of operations and
financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financials
Statements an Amendment of ARB
No. 51. SFAS No. 160 requires companies
to measure an acquisition of a non-controlling (minority)
interest at fair value in the equity section of the acquiring
entitys balance sheet. The new SFAS No. 160 will
be effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. For presentation and disclosure
requirements the new statement is to be applied retrospectively
for all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact on its results of operations and financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133. The Statement requires enhanced
disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging
activities. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The
Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a
material impact on its financial statements.
18
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162 The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
The Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles
and the framework for selecting the principles used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities
that are presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP
hierarchy). This Statement shall be effective 60 days
following the SECs approval of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity
With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does
not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material
impact on its financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163
Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance
Contracts. This Statement applies to financial
guarantee insurance (and reinsurance) contracts issued by
enterprises that are included within the scope of
paragraph 6 of Statement 60 and that are not accounted for
as derivative instruments. The recognition and measurement
provisions of this Statement shall be applied on a
contract-by-contract
basis. The Statement shall be effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does
not have such financial guarantee insurance (and reinsurance)
contracts and, therefore, does not expect the adoption of this
Statement to have a material impact on its financial statements.
3. Restructuring
General
During the nine months ended June 30, 2008 Qimonda
announced various restructuring measures aimed at reducing costs
and focusing efforts on faster conversions to more cost
efficient technologies. The Companys restructuring
expenses comprise four measures: the relocation of the backend
production in Malaysia from Malacca to Senai (Johor) near
Singapore, the phase-out of 200mm wafer supply by Infineon
Dresden, the combination of research activities in North America
and the implementation of permanent cost reductions compared to
the current cost structure. As of June 30, 2008 the Company
has accrued liabilities of 34 related to these measures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Charges
|
|
Payments
|
|
2008
|
|
Employee terminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
20
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relocation of
backend production in Malaysia
In March 2007, the Company had announced its intention to
relocate its backend production in Malaysia from its existing
facility in Malacca to a new backend production facility in
Senai (Johor) near Singapore by December 2008. Following the
move, the existing site in Malacca is to be completely closed
and the remaining employees are to be laid off. During the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2008 the Company accrued
0 and 4, respectively, for severance payments for
631 employees.
Phase-out of
200mm Manufacturing at Infineon Dresden
In April 2006 Infineon and Qimonda entered into a product
purchase agreement for the production of 200mm wafers by
Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. OHG
(Infineon Dresden) through September 30, 2007.
In January 2007, the agreement was extended through
September 30, 2009. Pursuant to the agreement, Infineon
agreed to manufacture wafers at Infineon Dresden, using the
Companys manufacturing technologies and masks, and to sell
them to the Company at prices specified in the agreement. The
Company agreed to pay for idle costs resulting from its
purchasing fewer wafers from Infineon Dresden than agreed upon,
if Infineon cannot otherwise utilize the capacity. Infineon and
the
19
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
Company agreed to share equally any potential restructuring
costs arising in connection with one Infineon Dresden module.
As part of its focus on improved profitability and 300mm
manufacturing, on November 30, 2007, the Company terminated
the aforementioned product purchase agreement with Infineon. The
Companys purchases of wafers from Infineon Dresden have
been completely phased out by the end of May 2008. As a result
of the termination, the Company had accrued liabilities of
10 as of June 30, 2008 for the reimbursement
obligation to Infineon. During the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2008 the Company incurred costs of 1 and
11, respectively. In addition, cost of goods sold includes
losses related to purchase commitments for 200mm wafer contract
manufacturing at Infineon Dresden of 3 and 33 for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively. Additionally, Infineon and the Company are
presently discussing additional reimbursement for Infineon from
the Company in respect of idle costs at Infineon Dresden, which
have not been incurred or accrued as of June 30, 2008.
Combination of
research activities in North America
Due to continued efforts to improve cost and efficiency, in
December 2007, the Company announced plans to consolidate its
U.S. research and development facilities into a single
development center located in Raleigh, North Carolina. As a
result, the Companys development center in Burlington,
Vermont, was closed by the end of June 2008. The Company accrued
restructuring costs of 0 and 4 during the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, relating to
lease termination costs and expected severance payments for
108 employees.
Cost reduction
program
On April 21, 2008 the Company announced a comprehensive
cost reduction program designed to adjust its cost structure and
lower its breakeven point. The Company targets 180 in
annualized cost reductions compared to the current cost
structure. These cost reductions are based on a combination of
reducing workforce in the range of 10% on a worldwide basis and
cutting its recurring costs. This includes a reduction in
non-volatile memory development to basic research activities and
the termination of the related agreement with Macronix. The
Company expects to realize these savings in full starting in its
2009 financial year and to accrue any restructuring charges
relating to this program by the end of its 2008 financial year.
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, the
Company incurred restructuring expenses in the amount of
19 in each period.
Income tax benefit (expense) for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (income) loss (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 17, 2007, the Business Tax Reform Act of 2008 was
enacted in Germany. This bill introduces several changes to the
taxation of German business activities, including a reduction of
the combined corporate and trade tax rate in Germany from
approximately 39% to 30%. Most of the changes apply to the
Company effective October 1, 2007 and affect the
Companys current tax rate from that date.
In the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008,
the Companys effective tax rate was lower than the
combined German statutory tax rate of 39% and 30%, respectively.
This resulted primarily
20
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
from income in jurisdictions with lower than average corporate
tax rates, the utilization of tax credits, and the recording of
additional valuation allowances against current period deferred
tax benefits arising in connection with the operating losses in
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008. Despite the
consolidated pretax loss, the Company generated taxable income
in some tax jurisdictions which resulted in the negative
effective tax rate during the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2008.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 109 Accounting for
Income Taxes, the Company has assessed its deferred
tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance. The
assessment was based on the benefits that could be realized from
available tax strategies, forecasted future taxable income to
the extent applicable, and the reversal of temporary differences
in future periods. As a result of this assessment, the Company
increased its deferred tax asset valuation allowance as of
June 30, 2008 to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount
that is more likely than not expected to be realized in future.
Changes in valuation allowance attributable to prior year tax
credits in the amounts of 0 and 10 were recorded for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Application of
FIN 48
The Company adopted FIN 48 Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 and related guidance on October 1,
2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for
uncertainties in income tax law. FIN 48 prescribes a
comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns.
FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and
measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance
with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the
tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of
available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not
that the position will be sustained upon being audited,
including resolution of any related appeals or litigation
processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the
largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized
upon ultimate settlement.
The adoption of FIN 48 as of October 1, 2007 did not
affect the Companys liability for unrecognized tax
benefits. The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as
of the date of adoption was 37. The unrecognized tax
benefits were increased during the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively. If recognized, the
unrecognized tax benefits resulting from the adoption of
FIN 48 and its increase in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2008, would favorably affect the Companys
effective tax rate. Interest and penalties related to income tax
liabilities are classified as interest expense. The Company had
no significant accrued interest and penalties recorded as of the
date of adoption.
During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 the
total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
ended
|
|
ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of period
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
37
|
Increase in unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of period
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company does not expect significant changes in the total
amount of unrecognized tax benefits through September 30,
2008. As of the date of adoption, the Companys tax returns
since the Formation remain subject to examination in the
majority of tax jurisdictions.
|
|
5.
|
Earnings (Loss)
Per Share
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) is calculated
by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding during the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
21
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
On November 24, 2006, the Company granted 1.9 million
stock options pursuant to the Qimonda Stock Option Plan
(note 13). None of these options were dilutive to EPS for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008. The
Company accounts for the potentially dilutive effects of its
stock options according to the provisions of
SFAS No. 123 (R) Share-Based
Payment.
On February 13, 2008, the Company issued convertible notes,
due in 2013, with a conversion option for up to 30 million
ADSs plus an overallotment option that was exercised by the
underwriting banks representing a conversion option for
4.2 million additional ADSs (notes 13 and 18). If the
conversion option were to be exercised, the number of
outstanding shares would increase. None of these options were
dilutive to EPS for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2008.
The computation of basic and diluted EPS for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Numerator Income (loss) available to ordinary
shareholders, basic and diluted
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
Denominator Weighted-average shares outstanding (in
millions), basic and diluted
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share (in euro), basic and diluted
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
(4.33
|
)
|
Marketable securities at September 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 consist of the following available-for-sale
marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Foreign government securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed term deposits
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reflected as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007 and 2008 available-for-sale marketable
securities in an unrealized loss position consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Debt securities as of June 30, 2007
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Debt securities as of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Because the decline in market value is mainly attributable to
changes in interest rates, and because the Company has the
ability and intent to hold those investments until a recovery of
fair value, which may
22
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
be until maturity, the Company does not consider those
investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
June 30, 2008.
Realized losses on sold marketable securities were 0 and
3 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008,
respectively, and 0 and 4 for the nine months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
The following table presents contractual maturities of debt
securities as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair value
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
After 1 year through 5 years
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
23
|
After 5 years through 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with no stated maturity date
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.
|
|
7.
|
Trade Accounts
Receivable, net
|
Trade accounts receivable at September 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Third party trade
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Infineon group trade (note 16)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Associated and Related Companies trade (note 16)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, gross
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories at September 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
28
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
147
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 20, 2007, Inotera issued 40 million common
shares, representing 1.2% of its outstanding share capital, as
bonuses to its employees, which diluted the Companys
ownership interest to 35.6%. The Company recorded the related
dilution loss of 7 as non-operating expense during the
three months ended December 31, 2007.
In connection with the Formation, Infineon and Qimonda entered
into a trust agreement under which Infineon placed the Inotera
shares in trust for the Company until the shares could legally
be transferred. In March 2007, the Inotera shares (except for a
portion representing less than 1% of the total shares) were
transferred to Qimonda. The Inotera shares were subject to
Taiwanese
lock-up
provisions related to the
23
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
Inotera IPO until January 2008, after which the remaining less
than 1% of the shares are eligible to be transferred to Qimonda
(note 21).
During the three months ended December 31, 2007 Sony
Corporation and Qimonda AG established the Qreatic Design joint
venture. The scope of the joint venture is the design of
high-performance, low power, embedded and customer specific
DRAMs for consumer and graphic applications. According to the
agreement, the 50:50 joint venture started with specialists from
Sony and Qimonda, bringing together their engineering expertise
for the mutual benefit of both companies. Qreatic Design, which
is located in Tokyo, Japan, started operations during the three
months ended December 31, 2007. The Company accounts for
its investment in Qreatic Design using the equity method of
accounting due to the lack of unilateral control.
|
|
10.
|
Intangible
Assets, net
|
Pursuant to SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets the Company tested goodwill for
impairment at March 31, 2008 due to the decline in the
Companys share price and general weakness in pricing for
DRAM products. Goodwill is tested for impairment using a
two-step process. In the first step, the fair value of the
reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair
value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the
net assets assigned to the reporting unit, goodwill is
considered not impaired and no further testing is required. If
the carrying value of the net assets assigned to a reporting
unit exceeds the fair value of a reporting unit, the second step
of the impairment test is performed in order to determine the
implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill.
Determining the implied fair value of goodwill requires the
valuation of the reporting units tangible and intangible
assets and liabilities in a manner similar to the allocation of
purchase price in a business combination and requires
considerable judgment. If the carrying value of the reporting
units goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, goodwill is
deemed impaired and is written down to the extent of the
difference.
As a result of the Companys fair value analysis as of
March 31, 2008, the carrying value of goodwill was
determined to exceed its implied fair value in full.
Accordingly, as of March 31, 2008 the Company recognized a
goodwill impairment charge in the amount of 61.
As of September 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008, the
Company had goodwill as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
64
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Impairment at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, the Company assessed its long-lived
assets for impairment pursuant to SFAS No. 144
Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets and determined that the Companys
long-lived assets are recoverable. Recoverability of assets to
be held and used is measured by a comparison of an assets
(or a group of assets) carrying value to undiscounted
future cash flows expected to be generated by that asset (or
group of assets). Considerable judgment is necessary to estimate
future cash flows. Management believes the assumptions
underlying estimated future cash flows used in the
recoverability assessment are reasonable. In future periods,
actual results could differ from such estimates made by
management, which could result in an impairment of long-lived
assets.
As a result of the protracted downturn in the DRAM industry and
the recent sharp decline in our share price, the Company has
requested an independent valuation in order to finally conclude
on the Companys assessment of recoverability. The Company
intends to conclude this valuation by September 30, 2008.
If the result of the valuation is a conclusion that the value of
the Companys long-lived assets is lower than their
carrying values, the Company will be required to write down
their carrying values. A write-down of this nature could be
material. In addition, a write-down may affect the
Companys compliance with financial covenants requiring the
Company to maintain prescribed levels of debt to equity. This
would require the Company to seek to renegotiate these
covenants, refinance the affected financing obligations or risk
breach of these covenants and repayment of related financing
obligations of 40 million as of June 30, 2008.
24
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
|
|
11.
|
Trade Accounts
Payable
|
Trade accounts payable at September 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Third party trade
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
415
|
Infineon group trade (note 16)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
35
|
Associated and Related Companies trade (note 16)
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt at September 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008 consists
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to banks, rate 5.45%
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
121
|
Current portion of long term debt, rate 5.08%
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
20
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured term bank loan, rate 5.08%, due 2013
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
83
|
Bank loan, rate 6.96% due 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
Notes payable to governmental entity, rate 3.45%, due 2027
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
21
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
159
|
Convertible notes principal portion, rate 6.75%, due
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2007, the Company entered into a four-year sale and
lease back transaction of a portion of its 200mm equipment at
its Richmond facility. In December 2007, the Company entered
into an additional four-year sale and lease back transaction of
additional 200mm equipment and a five-year sale and lease back
transaction of a portion of its 300mm equipment, both at its
Richmond facility. The leases are accounted for as capital
leases, whereby the present values of the respective lease
payments are reflected as capital lease obligations. In April
2008, the Company entered into a four-year sale and lease back
transaction of a portion of its 300mm equipment in its Dresden
facility. The lease is accounted for as capital lease, whereby
the present value of the respective lease payments is reflected
as a capital obligation over the lease term.
The Company can also draw, for short term purposes, on the
working capital lines it maintains in several locations with an
aggregate amount of 249 million as of June 30,
2008.
On January 29, 2008, Qimonda AG held its annual general
meeting of shareholders. The shareholders resolved to replace
the previous authorization of July 14, 2006 relating to the
issuance of securities with a new authorization to the
Management Board, effective until January 28, 2013, to
issue various types of securities having an aggregate face value
of up to the equivalent of 2,063. Following this
authorization, on February 13, 2008, Qimonda AGs
100%-owned finance subsidiary Qimonda Finance LLC issued
$218 million convertible notes due 2013 at par which are
fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Qimonda AG in an
underwritten registered offering in the U.S.A. On March 11,
2008, in connection with the exercise of the underwriters
overallotment option, additional $30 million convertible
notes were issued on the same terms. The notes are convertible,
at the option of the holders of the notes, into an aggregate
34.2 million ordinary shares of the Company, at an initial
conversion price of $7.2549 per share through maturity. The
notes accrue interest at 6.75% per year. The notes are unsecured
and rank pari passu with all present and
25
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
future unsecured unsubordinated obligations of the issuer. The
note holders have a negative pledge relating to future capital
market indebtedness, as defined. The note holders have an early
redemption option in the event of a fundamental change, as
defined. The Company may redeem the convertible notes after
three years at their principal amount plus interest accrued
thereon, if the Companys share price exceeds 150% of the
conversion price on 20 trading days during a period of 30
consecutive trading days. The convertible notes have been
admitted for open trading on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
Concurrently with this transaction, Infineon loaned Credit
Suisse International up to 21 million Qimonda ADSs
ancillary to the placement of the convertible notes.
Furthermore at issuance, the Company deferred issuance costs of
5 which will be amortized as part of interest expense over
the term of the convertible notes. At June 30, 2008
unamortized debt issuance costs amounted to 5.
At issuance, the equity conversion option embedded in the
convertible notes was bifurcated pursuant to
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities and a corresponding
amount is amortized as debt premium to interest expense over the
term of the convertible notes (notes 5 and 18).
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, the Company recognized interest expense of 3
and 5 related to both the nominal interest and amortized
debt premium of the convertible notes.
Aggregated amounts of debt, including capital lease obligations,
maturing subsequent to June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Within next 12 Months ending June 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
2009
|
|
|
194
|
2010
|
|
|
118
|
2011
|
|
|
82
|
2012
|
|
|
53
|
2013
|
|
|
163
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Stock-based
Compensation
|
A summary of the status of the Qimonda stock option plan 2006 as
of June 30, 2008, and changes during the nine months then
ended is presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
remaining
|
|
average
|
|
|
Options in
|
|
|
average
|
|
contractual life
|
|
grant date
|
|
|
million
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
(in years)
|
|
fair value
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of period
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
15.97
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.97
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
15.97
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to ultimately vest at end of period
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
15.97
|
|
|
4.40
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
Exercisable at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense for the Infineon and Qimonda
stock option plans was allocated as follows for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Compensation expense recognized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
Research and development expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
Qimonda stock options:
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
The amount of stock-based compensation cost which was
capitalized and remained in inventories during the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 was immaterial.
Stock-based compensation expense does not reflect income tax
benefits, since stock options are primarily granted in tax
jurisdictions where the expense is not deductible for tax
purposes. In addition, stock-based compensation expense did not
have a cash flow effect during the nine months ended
June 30, 2008 since no exercises of stock options occurred
during the period. As of June 30, 2008, for the
Infineon-related stock options, there was a total of 1 in
unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock
options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining
total period of 1.75 years, and for the Qimonda-related
stock options, there was a total of 3 in unrecognized
compensation expense related to unvested stock options which is
expected to be recognized over a remaining total period of
1.52 years.
Options on Infineon stock do not represent potential dilutive
instruments for Qimonda AG, and accordingly, they have no
dilutive impact on diluted EPS (note 5). The Qimonda stock
options were not dilutive to EPS for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2008 (note 5).
The changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive
(loss) income for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2007 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
Effect
|
|
Net
|
|
Pretax
|
|
Effect
|
|
Net
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
beginning of period
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Unrealized losses on securities, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
* Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income end of
period
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
Effect
|
|
Net
|
|
Pretax
|
|
Effect
|
|
Net
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
beginning of period
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Unrealized losses on securities, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
* Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income end of
period
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income as of
June 30, 2007 and 2008 has the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007
|
|
As of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
Effect
|
|
Net
|
|
Pretax
|
|
Effect
|
|
Net
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
Pension net actuarial gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Pension net prior service (cost) credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(1,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
15. Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest to Infineon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Interest to third parties
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
19
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
10
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations (note 12), net of foreign
currency translation effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
16. Related
Parties
The Company has transactions in the normal course of business
with Infineon group companies and with Related and Associated
Companies (together, Related Parties). The Company
purchases certain of its raw materials, especially chipsets,
from, and sells certain of its products to, Related Parties.
Purchases and sales to Related Parties are generally based on
market prices or manufacturing cost plus a
mark-up.
Related Party receivables as of September 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon group trade (note 7)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
2
|
Inotera trade (note 7)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
Other associated and related companies financial and
other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
Employee receivables
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Related Party receivables
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Party payables as of September 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon group trade (note 11)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
35
|
Inotera trade (note 11)
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Related Party payables
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Party receivables and payables have been segregated
first between amounts owed by or to Infineon group companies and
companies in which the Company has an ownership interest, and
second based on the underlying nature of the transactions. Trade
receivables and payables include amounts for the purchase and
sale of products and services. Financial and other receivables
and payables represent amounts owed relating to loans and
advances and accrued interest at interbank rates.
29
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
Transactions with Related Parties during the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Purchases from Related Parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon Dresden 200mm facility wafer purchases (note 3)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Information technology services
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Research and development services
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
General support services
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Production services
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Other services, mainly rent and employee-related
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Infineon group companies
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Inotera
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
AMTC
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Qreatic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchases from Related Parties
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense to Infineon group companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Wafer purchases from Infineon Dresden 200mm facility during the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 are
based on Infineons cost plus a margin.
All purchases from Inotera refer to wafer supplies for
manufacturing purposes.
Payments for purchases from related parties are generally made
in the normal course of business with payment terms being up to
two months.
Since the Formation, the Company entered into several service
agreements with Infineon. These include general support services
(including sales support, logistics services, purchasing
services, human resources services, facility management
services, patent support, finance, accounting and treasury
support, legal services and strategy services), R&D
services and IT services. In addition Qimonda also provides
certain services to Infineon under these agreements (e.g.
production services). Transactions under these agreements during
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 are
included in purchases from Infineon in the table above.
In connection with the Formation, the Company entered into a
global service agreement with Infineon, whereby the parties
intend to provide standard support services to one another based
on actual costs plus a margin of 3%. The Company and Infineon
have also entered into a research and development services
agreement for the provision of research and development services
between the parties based on actual cost plus a margin of 3%.
Under the master information technology cost sharing agreement,
Infineon and the Company generally agree to share costs of a
variety of information technology services provided by one or
both parties in the common interest and for the common benefit
of both parties. In general, the parties agree to share the
fixed costs of the services provided (accounting for
approximately 53% of total costs) roughly equally and to share
variable costs in a manner that reflects each partys
contribution to those costs. Under the master information
technology service agreement, Infineon and the Company agree to
provide information technology services to one another. In
general, under all of these agreements, the service recipient
pays a fee based on actual or estimated total costs incurred
plus a margin of 3% for the period from May 1, 2006 to
September 30, 2008 and thereafter as mutually agreed from
year to year.
30
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
17. Pension
Plans
The components of net periodic pension cost (NPPC)
for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008
are presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPPC
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimonda made contributions during the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Financial
Instruments
The Company periodically enters into financial instruments,
including foreign currency forward contracts. The objective of
foreign currency forward contracts is to reduce the impact of
exchange rate fluctuations on the Companys foreign
currency-denominated net future cash flows. The Company does not
enter into derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
The euro equivalent notional amounts in millions and fair values
of the Companys derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2007 and June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
Fair
|
|
Notional
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Forward contracts sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
2
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts purchased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysian ringgit
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other currencies
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion option separated from the convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Interest swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
Gains and losses from foreign currency derivatives and
transactions are principally included in cost of goods sold, and
were as follows for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Net gains (losses) from foreign currency derivatives and
transactions
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
At the issuance of the Companys convertible notes
(note 12) during the three months ended March 31,
2008, the equity conversion option embedded in the convertible
notes was bifurcated pursuant to SFAS No. 133 and a
corresponding amount of 23 is accreted as debt premium to
interest expense over the term of the convertible notes. The
conversion option is recorded at its estimated fair value of
6 in other non-current liabilities as of June 30,
2008, with changes in the fair value recorded as part of other
non-operating income or expense. For the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2008, the Company recognized other
non-operating income of 16 and 17 as a result of the
change in value of the conversion option.
19. Commitments
and Contingencies
Contribution
from Infineon
These contingencies described below were assigned to the Company
pursuant to the contribution agreement entered into between
Infineon and the Company in connection with the Formation.
Under the contribution agreement, the Company is required to
indemnify Infineon, in whole or in part as specified below, for
any claim (including any related expenses) arising in connection
with the liabilities, contracts, offers, uncompleted
transactions, continuing obligations, risks, encumbrances and
other liabilities Infineon incurs in connection with the matters
described below.
The contribution agreement is based on the principle that all
potential liabilities and risks in connection with legal matters
existing as of the Formation date are generally to be borne by
the business unit which caused the risk or liability or where
the risk or liability arose. Except to the limited extent
described below for the securities class action litigation and
the settled Tessera litigation (for which the Company has
different arrangements), the Company has agreed to indemnify
Infineon for all liabilities arising in connection with all
legal matters specifically described below, including court
costs and legal fees. Infineon will not settle or otherwise
agree to any of these liabilities without the Companys
prior consent. Liabilities and risks relating to the securities
class action litigation, including court costs, will be equally
shared by Infineon and the Company, but only with respect to the
amount by which the total amount payable exceeds the amount of
the corresponding accrued liability that Infineon transferred to
the Company at the Formation. Infineon has agreed not to settle
this lawsuit without the Companys prior consent. Any
expenses incurred in connection with the assertion of claims
against the provider of directors and officers
(D & O) insurance covering Infineons two
current or former officers named as defendants in the suit will
also be equally shared. The D & O insurance provider
has so far refused coverage. The Company has agreed to indemnify
Infineon for 80% of the court costs and legal fees relating to
the settled litigation with Tessera.
The Company has further agreed to pay 60% of the total license
fees payable by Infineon and the Company to which Infineon and
the Company may agree in connection with two cases in which
negotiations relating to licensing and cross-licensing were
ongoing at the time of the Formation, one of which is still
ongoing.
In accordance with the general principle that all potential
risks or liabilities are to be borne by the entity which caused
the risk or liability or where the risk or liability arose, the
indemnification provisions of the contribution agreement include
the following specific provisions with respect to claims or
lawsuits arising after the Formation:
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities arising in connection with intellectual property
infringement claims relating to memory products are to be borne
by the Company.
|
32
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities arising in connection with actual or alleged
antitrust violations with respect to DRAM products are to be
borne by the Company.
|
Litigation
In September 2004, Infineon entered into a plea agreement with
the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) in connection with its ongoing investigation
of alleged antitrust violations in the DRAM industry. Pursuant
to this plea agreement, Infineon agreed to plead guilty to a
single count related to the pricing of DRAM between July 1,
1999 and June 15, 2002, and to pay a fine of
$160 million. The fine plus accrued interest is to be paid
in equal annual installments through 2009. On October 25,
2004, the plea agreement was accepted by the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California. Therefore, the
matter has been fully resolved as between Infineon and the DOJ,
subject to Infineons obligation to cooperate with the DOJ
in its ongoing investigation of other participants in the DRAM
industry. The charges by the DOJ related to DRAM-product sales
to six Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)
customers that manufacture computers and servers. Infineon has
entered into settlement agreements with five of these OEM
customers and is considering the possibility of a settlement
with the remaining OEM customer, which purchased only a very
small volume of DRAM from Infineon.
Subsequent to the commencement of the DOJ investigation, a
number of purported class action lawsuits were filed against
Infineon, its principal U.S. subsidiary and other DRAM
suppliers.
Sixteen cases were filed between June 2002 and September 2002 in
several U.S. federal district courts purporting to be on
behalf of a class of individuals and entities who purchased DRAM
directly from various DRAM suppliers in the U.S. during a
specified time period (Direct U.S. Purchaser
Class), alleging price-fixing in violation of the Sherman
Act and seeking treble damages in unspecified amounts, costs,
attorneys fees, and an injunction against the allegedly
unlawful conduct.
In September 2002, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District
Litigation ordered that the foregoing federal cases be
transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial
proceedings as part of a Multi-District Litigation
(MDL).
In September 2005, Infineon and its principal
U.S. subsidiary entered into a definitive settlement
agreement with counsel to the Direct U.S. Purchaser Class
(granting an opportunity for individual class members to opt out
of the settlement). The settlement agreement was approved by the
court on November 1, 2006 and the court entered final
judgment and dismissed the class action claims with prejudice on
November 2, 2006. The Company has reached individual
settlements with eight direct customers in addition to those
OEMs identified by the DOJ.
In April 2006, Unisys Corporation (Unisys) filed a
complaint against Infineon and its principal
U.S. subsidiary, among other DRAM suppliers, alleging state
and federal claims for price fixing and seeking recovery as both
a direct and indirect purchaser of DRAM. The complaint was filed
in the Northern District of California, and has been related to
the MDL described above.
On May 5, 2006, Honeywell International, Inc. filed a
complaint against Infineon and its U.S. subsidiary, among
other DRAM suppliers, alleging a claim for price fixing under
federal law, and seeking recovery as a direct purchaser of DRAM;
this claim was dismissed without prejudice in April 2007.
In February 2007 and March 2007 four more opt-out cases were
filed by All American Semiconductor, Inc., Edge
Electronics, Inc., Jaco Electronics, Inc. and DRAM Claims
Liquidation Trust, by its Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The
All American Semiconductor complaint alleges claims for
price-fixing under the Sherman Act. The Edge Electronics, Jaco
Electronics and DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust complaints allege
state and federal claims for price-fixing. As with Unisys, the
claims of these plaintiffs are not barred by Infineons
settlement with the Direct U.S. Purchaser Class, since they
opted out of the Direct U.S. Purchaser Class and
settlement. All four of these opt-out cases were filed in the
Northern District of California and have been related to the MDL
described above. Based upon the Courts order dismissing
portions of the initial Unisys complaint, the plaintiffs in all
these opt-out cases filed amended complaints in May 2007. In
June 2007, Infineon and its principal U.S. subsidiary
answered the complaints filed by All American Semiconductor,
Inc., Edge Electronics, Inc., and Jaco Electronics, Inc. and,
along with its co-defendants, filed joint motions to dismiss
certain portions of the DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust and Unisys
amended complaint. On October 15, 2007 the Court denied
33
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
the motion to dismiss the Unisys amended complaint and deferred
ruling on the motion to dismiss the DRAM Claims Liquidation
Trust complaint. On October 29, 2007, Infineon and its
principal U.S. subsidiary answered the amended complaints
of Unisys and DRAM Claims Liquidations Trust. Fact discovery in
all of the cases closed on December 17, 2007. The court has
scheduled a trial date for June 1, 2009.
Sixty-four additional cases were filed between August 2002 and
October 2005 in numerous federal and state courts throughout the
United States. Each of these state and federal cases (except a
case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in May 2005 on behalf of foreign
purchasers who directly purchased DRAM outside the
U.S. between 1999 and 2002 (Foreign Purchaser
Case)) purports to be on behalf of a class of individuals
and entities who indirectly purchased DRAM in the
U.S. during specified time periods commencing in or after
1999. The complaints variously allege violations of the Sherman
Act, Californias Cartwright Act, various other state laws,
unfair competition law and unjust enrichment and seek treble
damages in generally unspecified amounts, restitution, costs,
attorneys fees and an injunction against the allegedly
unlawful conduct.
Twenty-three of the state (outside California) and federal court
cases and the Foreign Purchaser Case were ordered transferred to
the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California for coordinated and consolidated pre-trial
proceedings as part of the MDL described above. After this
transfer, the plaintiffs dismissed two of the transferred cases.
Two additional transferred cases were subsequently remanded back
to their relevant state courts. Nineteen of the twenty-three
transferred cases are currently pending in the MDL-litigation.
The Foreign Purchaser Case was dismissed with prejudice and
without leave to amend in March 2006. Plaintiffs in that case
appealed and oral arguments were heard before the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals on March 13, 2008. No decision has yet
been issued. The California state cases were ordered transferred
for coordinated and consolidated pre-trial proceedings to the
San Francisco County Superior Court. The plaintiffs in the
indirect purchaser cases that originated outside California
which have not been transferred to the MDL agreed to stay
proceedings in those cases pending resolution of the MDL
pretrial-proceedings through a single complaint on behalf of a
putative nationwide class of indirect purchasers in the MDL. On
January 29, 2008, the court issued an order granting in
part and denying in part defendants motion to dismiss
several of the claims. The order dismissed certain claims
brought under a number of states antitrust laws on behalf
of indirect purchasers of products in which DRAM was a component
without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended
Complaint on February 27, 2008. Infineon and its principal
U.S. subsidiary answered the complaint on March 18,
2008. On March 28, 2008, the court granted plaintiffs leave
to immediately appeal the decision to the Court of Appeals for
the Ninth Circuit. On June 26, 2008, the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals issued an order agreeing to hear the appeal.
Plaintiffs have agreed to a stay of further proceedings in the
state court cases until the appeal is complete. The District
Court stayed proceedings pending the Court of Appeals
decision whether to accept the appeal, and will schedule a
hearing in near future to decide whether the stay should remain
in place until the appeal is decided.
In July 2006, the New York state attorney general filed an
action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District
of New York against Infineon, its principal U.S. subsidiary
and several other DRAM manufacturers on behalf of New York
governmental entities and New York consumers who purchased
products containing DRAM beginning in 1998. The plaintiffs
allege violations of state and federal antitrust laws arising
out of the same allegations of DRAM price-fixing and artificial
price inflation practices discussed above, and seek recovery of
actual and treble damages in unspecified amounts, penalties,
costs (including attorneys fees) and injunctive and other
equitable relief. In October 2006, this action was made part of
the MDL proceedings. In July 2006, the attorneys general of
California, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware,
Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska,
Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah,
Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin
filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California against Infineon, its principal
U.S. subsidiary and several other DRAM manufacturers on
behalf of governmental entities, consumers and businesses in
each of those states who purchased products containing DRAM
beginning in 1998. In September 2006, the complaint was amended
to add claims by the attorneys general of Kentucky, Maine, New
Hampshire, North Carolina, the Northern Mariana Islands and
Rhode Island. This action is based on state and federal law
claims relating to the same alleged anticompetitive practices in
the sale of DRAM and
34
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
plaintiffs seek recovery of actual and treble damages in
unspecified amounts, penalties, costs (including attorneys
fees) and injunctive and other relief. In October 2006 Infineon
joined the other defendants in filing motions to dismiss several
of the claims alleged in these two actions. In August 2007, the
court entered orders granting the motions in part and denying
the motions in part. The courts order dismissed the claims
on behalf of consumers, businesses and governmental entities in
a number of states, and dismissed certain other claims with
leave to amend. Amended complaints in both actions were filed on
October 1, 2007. On November 26, 2007 Infineon joined
the other defendants in filing motions to dismiss several of the
claims alleged in these amended complaints. A hearing was held
for these motions on February 27, 2008. Since then,
plaintiffs California and New Mexico filed a joint motion for
class certification seeking to certify classes of all public
entities within both states. A hearing was held on that motion
on April 9, 2008 but no ruling has yet been issued. On
April 10, 2008, the state attorney general of Delaware
filed a request for dismissal of his claims without prejudice.
On April 15, 2008, the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California issued two orders in the New
York and multistate state attorneys general cases on the
defendants motions to dismiss. The order in the New York
action denied defendants motion to dismiss. The order in
the multistate state attorneys general case dismissed indirect
purchaser claims under one states antitrust law and
dismissed parens patriae claims on behalf of consumers
under certain states consumer protection laws. The
multistate order also granted defendants motion to strike
any claim for relief seeking damages under certain states
laws. The order denied defendants motion with respect to
indirect purchaser claims under one states consumer
protection statute and claims under certain states
antitrust statutes). Between June 25, 2007 and
April 28, 2008, the attorneys general of four states,
Alaska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Texas and Vermont, filed requests
for dismissal of their claims without prejudice.
In April 2003, Infineon received a request for information from
the European Commission (the Commission) to enable
the Commission to assess the compatibility with the
Commissions rules on competition of certain practices of
which the Commission has become aware in the European market for
DRAM products. Infineon reassessed the matter after its plea
agreement with the DOJ and made an accrual during the 2004
financial year for a probable minimum fine that may be imposed
as a result of the Commissions investigation. Any fine
actually imposed by the Commission may be significantly higher
than the reserve established, although Infineon cannot more
accurately estimate the amount of such actual fine. Infineon is
fully cooperating with the Commission in its investigation.
In May 2004, the Canadian Competition Bureau advised
Infineons principal U.S. subsidiary that it and its
affiliated companies are among the targets of a formal inquiry
into alleged violations of the Canadian Competition Act. No
compulsory process (such as subpoenas) has been issued. Infineon
is cooperating with the Competition Bureau in its inquiry.
Between December 2004 and February 2005, two putative class
proceedings were filed in the Canadian province of Quebec and
one was filed in each of Ontario and British Columbia against
Infineon, its principal U.S. subsidiary and other DRAM
manufacturers on behalf of all direct and indirect purchasers
resident in Canada who purchased DRAM or products containing
DRAM between July 1999 and June 2002, seeking damages,
investigation and administration costs, as well as interest and
legal costs. Plaintiffs primarily allege conspiracy to unduly
restrain competition and to illegally fix the price of DRAM. In
the British Columbia action a motion to certify the action to
proceed as a class action was dismissed by the B.C. Supreme
Court in May 2008; the plaintiff has filed an appeal to the
Court of Appeal. In one Quebec class action, the motion for
authorization (certification) was dismissed by the Quebec
Superior Court in June 2008. The other Quebec action has been
stayed pending developments in the one that is going forward.
Between September 2004 and November 2004, seven securities class
action complaints were filed against Infineon and three of its
current or former officers (of which one officer was
subsequently dropped as a defendant) in the U.S. District
Courts for the Northern District of California and the Southern
District of New York. The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the
New York cases, and in June 2005 filed a consolidated amended
complaint in California on behalf of a putative class of
purchasers of Infineons publicly-traded securities, who
purchased them during the period between March 2000 and July
2004, effectively combining all lawsuits. The consolidated
amended complaint added Infineons principal
U.S. subsidiary and four then-current or former employees
of Infineon and its affiliate as defendants. It alleges
violations of the U.S. securities laws and asserts that the
defendants made materially false and misleading public
35
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
statements about Infineons historical and projected
financial results and competitive position because they did not
disclose Infineons alleged participation in DRAM
price-fixing activities and that, by fixing the price of DRAM,
defendants manipulated the price of Infineons securities,
thereby injuring its shareholders. The plaintiffs seek
unspecified compensatory damages, interest, costs and
attorneys fees. In September 2006, the court dismissed the
complaint with leave to amend and in October 2006 the plaintiffs
filed a second amended complaint. In March 2007, pursuant to a
stipulation agreed with the defendants, the plaintiffs withdrew
the second amended complaint and were granted a motion for leave
to file a third amended complaint. Plaintiffs filed a third
amended complaint in July 2007. On January 25, 2008 the
court entered into an order granting in part and denying in part
the defendants motion to dismiss. The court denied the
motion to dismiss with respect to plaintiffs claims under
§§ 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the
U.S. Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act) and
dismissed the claim under § 20 A of the Act with
prejudice. In the contribution agreement the Company entered
into with Infineon, the Company agreed to share any future
liabilities arising out of this lawsuit equally with Infineon,
including the cost of defending the suit.
Infineon believes these claims are without merit. The Company is
currently unable to provide an estimate of the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome to Infineon or of the amount or range of
potential loss arising from these actions. If the outcome of
these actions is unfavorable or if Infineon incurs substantial
legal fees in defending these actions regardless of outcome, it
may have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition and results of operations. Infineons
directors and officers insurance carriers have
denied coverage in the securities class actions and Infineon
filed suits against the carriers in December 2005 and August
2006. Infineons claims against one D&O insurance
carrier were finally dismissed in May 2007. The claims against
the other insurance carrier are still pending.
On April 10, 2007, Lin Packaging Technologies, Ltd. (Lin)
filed a lawsuit against Infineon, its principal
U.S. subsidiary and an additional DRAM manufacturer in the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,
alleging that certain DRAM products were infringing two Lin
patents. In May 2007, Lin amended its complaint to include
Qimonda AG, Qimonda North America Corp. and Qimonda Richmond
LLC. In November 2007 the parties settled and the case was
dismissed.
On March 31, 2008, Technology Park Partners, LLC
(Technology Park), filed a lawsuit against Qimonda
North America Corp. (Qimonda NA) in the United
States District Court for the District of Vermont. The lawsuit
alleges that Qimonda NA has breached a ten year term lease
whereby Qimonda NA, as tenant, leased from Technology Park
59,245 net square feet of office space in its building in
South Burlington, Vermont for a period of ten years starting
March 1, 2008 (Lease), by failing to take
possession of the premises and to pay for certain improvements
and other amounts Technology Park claims are due under the
lease. Qimonda NA has filed an answer denying the allegations of
the complaint (note 21).
On April 18, 2008 LSI Corporation filed a complaint with
the US International Trade Commission to investigate an alleged
infringement by 18 respondents of one LSI patent (the ITC
Case). On June 6, 2008 LSI filed a motion to amend
such complaint to add Qimonda and 4 other respondents to the
investigation. In addition, LSI filed a lawsuit in the Eastern
District of Texas on the same patent against all respondents in
the ITC case, including Qimonda. Qimonda has not yet been served
and formally added to these proceedings, but expects the case in
the Eastern District of Texas to be stayed while the ITC Case is
pending.
Accruals and the
potential effect of these lawsuits
Liabilities related to legal proceedings are recorded when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the associated
amount can be reasonably estimated. Where the estimated amount
of loss is within a range of amounts and no amount within the
range is a better estimate than any other amount or the range
cannot be estimated, the minimum amount is accrued. As of
June 30, 2008 the Company had accrued liabilities in the
amount of 77 related to the DOJ and European antitrust
investigations and the direct and indirect purchaser litigation
and settlements described above, as well as for legal expenses
relating to the securities class actions and the Canadian
antitrust investigation and litigation described above. As
additional information becomes available, the potential
liability related to these matters will be reassessed and the
estimates revised, if necessary. These accrued liabilities would
be subject to change
36
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
in the future based on new developments in each matter, or
changes in circumstances, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys results of operations and financial
condition.
An adverse final resolution of the antitrust investigations or
related civil claims or the securities class action lawsuits
described above could result in significant financial liability
to, and other adverse effects on the Company, which would have a
material adverse effect on the Companys business, results
of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In each of
these matters, the Company is continuously evaluating the merits
of its respective claims and defending itself vigorously or
seeking to arrive at alternative resolutions in the best
interests of the Company, as its deems appropriate. Irrespective
of the validity or the successful assertion of the claims
described above, the Company could incur significant costs with
respect to defending against or settling such claims, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations and financial condition and cash flows.
The Company is subject to various other lawsuits, legal actions,
claims and proceedings related to products, patents and other
matters incidental to its businesses. The Company has accrued a
liability for the estimated costs of adjudication of various
asserted and unasserted claims existing as of the balance sheet
date. Based upon information presently known to management, the
Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of such
other pending matters will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position, although the final resolution
of such matters could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations or cash flows in the year
of settlement.
Contractual
Commitments
On October 8, 2007, Qimonda entered into a rental agreement
for new headquarter offices south of Munich, Germany. The
agreement involves the construction of a building by a third
party lessor, and includes a 15 year non-cancelable lease
term, which is expected to start in early 2010. Qimonda has an
option to extend the lease for two 5 year periods at
similar lease terms to the initial non-cancelable lease term.
The minimum rental payments aggregate 96 over the initial
lease term. The lease contract provides for rent escalation in
line with market-based increases in rent. The agreement will be
accounted for as an operating lease with monthly lease payments
expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In April
2008, the parties agreed to defer the project until January 2009.
The Companys operating lease expenses were 8 and
23 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007
and were 8 and 23 for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Operating lease payments
include amounts paid to Infineon for lease payments.
Other
Contingencies
The Company has received government grants and subsidies related
to the construction and financing of certain of its production
facilities. These amounts are recognized upon the attainment of
specified criteria. Certain of these grants have been received
contingent upon the Company maintaining compliance with certain
project-related requirements for a specified period after
receipt. The Company is committed to maintaining these
requirements. Nevertheless, should such requirements not be met,
as of June 30, 2008, a maximum of 268 of these
subsidies could be refundable.
The Company has guarantees outstanding to external parties of
137 as of June 30, 2008, that mainly expire through
2013. Guarantees are mainly issued by Infineon for the payment
of import duties, rentals of buildings, contingent obligations
related to government grants received and the consolidated debt
of subsidiaries. Such guarantees which relate to Qimonda AG were
transferred to the Company as part of the Formation. The Company
also agreed to indemnify Infineon against any losses it may
suffer under several guarantee and financing arrangements that
relate to its business but that cannot be transferred to it for
legal, technical or practical reasons.
The Company, through certain of its sales and other agreements,
in the normal course of business, may be obligated to indemnify
its counterparties under certain conditions for warranties,
patent infringement or other matters. The maximum amount of
potential future payments under these types of agreements is not
predictable with any degree of certainty, since the potential
obligation is contingent on conditions that may or may not occur
in future, and depends on specific facts and circumstances
related to
37
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
each agreement. Historically, payments made by the Company under
these types of agreements have not had a material adverse effect
on the Companys business, results of operations or
financial condition.
|
|
20.
|
Operating Segment
and Geographic Information
|
The Company has one operating segment, Memory Products, which is
also its reportable segment, consistent with the manner in which
financial information is internally reported and used by the
Chief Operating Decision Maker for purposes of evaluating
business performance and allocating resources.
The Company defines EBIT as earnings (loss) before interest and
taxes. The Companys management uses EBIT, among other
measures, to establish budgets and operational goals, to manage
the consolidated Companys business and to evaluate and
report performance as part of the Infineon Group. Because many
operating decisions, such as allocations of resources to
individual projects, are made on a basis for which the effects
of financing the overall business and of taxation are of
marginal relevance, management finds a metric that excludes the
effects of interest on financing and tax expense useful. In
addition, in measuring operating performance, particularly for
the purpose of making internal decisions, such as those relating
to personnel matters, it is useful for management to consider a
measure that excludes items over which the individuals being
evaluated have minimal control, such as enterprise-level
taxation and financing. The Company reports EBIT information
because it believes that it provides investors with meaningful
information about the operating performance of the Company in a
manner similar to that which management uses to assess and
direct the business. EBIT is not a substitute for net income,
however, because the exclusion of interest and tax expense is
not appropriate when reviewing the overall profitability of the
Company.
EBIT is determined as follows from the consolidated statements
of operations, without adjustment to the U.S. GAAP amounts
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
Adjust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(1,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of net sales by geographic area for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
8%
|
Rest of Europe
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
9%
|
North America
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
33%
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
33%
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
41%
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
38%
|
Japan
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For practical purposes, the Rest of Europe region also includes
other countries and territories in the rest of the world outside
of the listed main geographic regions with aggregate sales
representing no more than 1% of total sales in any period
38
QIMONDA AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(euro in millions, except where otherwise stated)
The following significant events occurred after June 30,
2008:
On July 8, 2008, Qimonda decided to close down its design
centers at its Italian subsidiarys sites in Padua and
Milan by the end of 2008. Qimonda estimates that the
restructuring expenses in connection with these closures amount
to about 5 and will be incurred in the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. The expenses relate to the termination
of employees and the cancellation of rental contracts.
On July 14, 2008, Qimonda North America reached a tentative
agreement with Technology Park to settle all claims and disputes
related to the complaint regarding the lease in Vermont and plan
to finalize a written agreement shortly (note 19).
On July 17, 2008 the remaining shares of Inotera held by
Infineon were transferred to Qimonda. This completed the legal
transfer of all Inotera shares from Infineon to Qimonda
(note 9).
On July 17, 2008 the plaintiffs in the Quebec antitrust
action, whose motion for authorization (certification) was
dismissed by the Quebec Superior Court in June 2008, filed
an appeal against this court decision (note 19).
39
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Gross and Net
Cash Position
Qimonda defines gross cash position as cash and cash equivalents
and marketable securities, and net cash position as gross cash
position less short and long-term debt. Since its Formation,
Qimonda holds a substantial portion of its available monetary
resources in the form of readily marketable securities, which
for U.S. GAAP purposes are not considered to be
cash, it reports its gross cash position to provide
investors with an understanding of its overall liquidity. The
gross and net cash positions are determined as follows from the
condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30,
2007 and June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Cash and cash equivalent
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Cash Position
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
Less: Short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Debt) Position
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Capital
Employed (RoCE)
In addition to EBIT, the Qimonda management committed itself
from the 2007 financial year going forward to focus on measuring
the profitability of the Company compared to the capital that
has been required. Therefore, the financial indicator Return on
Capital Employed (RoCE) was implemented to measure
this performance.
Earnings before interest, Capital Employed and RoCE are non-GAAP
financial measures. Reconciliations to the closest GAAP measures
of net (loss) income, shareholders equity, and net (loss)
income to shareholders equity ratio, respectively, are
presented below. Capital Employed is the end period
shareholders equity less the net cash position. RoCE is
calculated as Earnings before Interest (EBI) divided by Capital
Employed. Quarterly RoCE calculations are annualized for
purposes of this ratio only, which may exceed reported annual
earnings and is not indicative of expected earnings in any
future period.
RoCE is determined as follows from the condensed consolidated
financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
Less: Net (Cash) Debt Position
|
|
|
(707
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Employed
|
|
|
2,810
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
Adjust: Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before Interest
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(1,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)/Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
|
(83
|
)%
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)%
|
Return on Capital Employed
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
(82
|
)%
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)%
|
Free Cash
Flow
Qimonda defines free cash flow as cash from operating and
investing activities excluding purchases or sales of marketable
securities. Free cash flow is not defined under U.S. GAAP
and may not be comparable with measures of the same or similar
title that are reported by other companies. Under SEC rules,
free cash flow is considered a non-GAAP financial
measure. It should not be considered as a substitute for, or
confused with, any U.S. GAAP financial measure. Management
believes the most
40
comparable U.S. GAAP measure is net cash provided by
operating activities. Since Qimonda operates in a
capital-intensive industry, it reports free cash flow to provide
investors with a measure that can be used to evaluate changes in
liquidity after taking capital expenditures into account. It is
not intended to represent residual cash flow available for
discretionary expenditures, since debt service requirements or
other non-discretionary expenditures are not deducted. The free
cash flow is determined as follows from the Companys
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Therein: Purchases of marketable securities available
for sale
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Proceeds
from marketable securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees
As of June 30, 2008 Qimonda had 12,806 employees
worldwide, including 2,437 engaged in research and development.
The term employees includes the nominal number of
all full-time employees with unlimited and limited contracts and
the nominal number of all part-time employees with unlimited and
limited contracts regardless of individual working time. The
term does not include work students who are officially enrolled
in a university, college or school, apprentices and interns,
employees of nonconsolidated subsidiaries, as well as
temporarily leased workers and consultants.
Market for
ordinary shares
Qimonda AG ordinary shares are traded as American Depository
Shares (ADSs) on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
QI. The shares are also traded in the Open Market
(Freiverkehr) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under A0KEAT.
Financial
Calendar
Qimonda plans to announce results for its financial year ending
September 30, 2008, on December 4, 2008.
Publication
date
August 1, 2008
Contact
information
Qimonda AG
Investor Relations
Gustav-Heinemann-Ring 212
81739 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49 89
60088-1200
E-Mail:
mailto:investor.relations@qimonda.com
Visit
http://www.qimonda.com/
for an electronic version of this report and other information.
41
Risk
Factors
As a Company, we face numerous risks incidental to our business.
We face risks that are inherent to companies in the
semiconductor industry, as well as operational, financial and
regulatory risks that are unique to us. Risks relating to the
semiconductor industry include the cyclical nature of the
market, which suffers from periodic downturns and industry
overcapacity. Our production related risks include the need to
match our production capacity with demand, and to avoid
interruptions in manufacturing and supplies. We may be exposed
to claims from others that we infringe their intellectual
property rights or that we are liable for damages under
warranties. We are the subject of governmental antitrust
investigations and civil claims related to those antitrust
investigations. Financial risks include our need to have access
to sufficient capital and governmental subsidies, as well as
declines in our share price which may result in impairment
charges. Our regulatory risks include potential claims for
environmental remediation. We face numerous risks due to the
international nature of our business, including volatility in
foreign countries and exchange rate fluctuations.
These and other material risks that we face are described in
detail in the Risk Factors section of our annual
report on
Form 20-F
for the year ended September 30, 2007, which we have filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. A copy of
our
Form 20-F
is available at the Investor Relations section of our website
http://www.qimonda.com,
as well as on the SECs website,
http://www.sec.gov.
We encourage you to read the detailed description of the risks
that we face in our
Form 20-F.
The occurrence of one or more of the events described in the
Risk Factors section of the
Form 20-F
could have a material adverse effect on our Company and our
results of operations, which could result in a drop in our share
price.
Forward-looking
Statements
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements.
Statements that are not historical facts, including statements
about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking
statements.
These forward-looking statements include statements relating to
future developments of the world semiconductor market,
especially the market for memory products, Qimondas future
growth, the benefits of research and development alliances and
activities, our planned levels of future investment in the
expansion and modernization of our production capacity, the
introduction of new technology at our facilities, the
transitioning of our production processes to smaller structures,
cost savings related to such transitioning and other
initiatives, our successful development of technology based on
industry standards, our ability to offer commercially viable
products based on our technology, our ability to achieve our
cost savings and growth targets, and any further corporate
reorganization measures in that regard. These statements are
based on current plans, estimates and projections, and you
should not place too much reliance on them.
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they
are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any of them
in light of new information or future events. These
forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and are
subject to a number of uncertainties, including trends in demand
and prices for semiconductors generally and for our products in
particular, the success of our development efforts, both alone
and with our partners, the success of our efforts to introduce
new production processes at our facilities and the actions of
our competitors, the availability of funds for planned expansion
efforts, the outcome of antitrust investigations and litigation
matters, as well as other factors. We caution you that these and
a number of other important factors could cause actual results
or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in any
forward-looking statement. These factors include those
identified under the heading Risk Factors in the
Form 20-F.
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
QIMONDA AG
|
|
Date: August 1, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Kin Wah Loh
|
|
|
|
Kin Wah Loh |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Management Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Dr. Michael Majerus
|
|
|
|
Dr. Michael Majerus |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and
Member of the Management Board |
|
|