lowesform10q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended November 2, 2012
|
or
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from ______ to ______
|
Commission File Number
|
1-7898
|
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
NORTH CAROLINA
|
56-0578072
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
1000 Lowe's Blvd., Mooresville, NC
|
28117
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
|
(704) 758-1000
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
CLASS
|
|
OUTSTANDING AT NOVEMBER 30, 2012
|
Common Stock, $.50 par value
|
|
1,124,677,129 |
LOWE’S COMPANIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I - Financial Information |
|
Page No. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
16-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II - Other Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
|
26-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Millions, Except Par Value Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
February 3, 2012
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,091
|
|
$
|
675
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
286
|
|
Merchandise inventory - net
|
|
|
8,995
|
|
|
8,990
|
|
|
8,355
|
|
Deferred income taxes - net
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
183
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
10,830
|
|
|
10,423
|
|
|
10,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
21,591
|
|
|
21,888
|
|
|
21,970
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
504
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
33,953
|
|
$
|
33,866
|
|
$
|
33,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
$
|
590
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
5,242
|
|
|
4,352
|
|
Accrued compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
613
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
801
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
1,913
|
|
|
1,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
8,614
|
|
|
9,156
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
|
|
|
9,004
|
|
|
6,025
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
Deferred income taxes - net
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
531
|
|
Deferred revenue - extended protection plans
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
704
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
19,728
|
|
|
17,057
|
|
|
17,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock - $5 par value, none issued
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common stock - $.50 par value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 3, 2012
|
1,241
|
|
561
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
621
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
14
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
13,602
|
|
|
16,109
|
|
|
15,852
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
|
|
14,225
|
|
|
16,809
|
|
|
16,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
$
|
33,953
|
|
$
|
33,866
|
|
$
|
33,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
|
|
|
|
|
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Millions, Except Per Share and Percentage Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Current Earnings
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Net sales
|
$ |
12,073 |
|
100.00 |
|
$ |
11,852 |
|
100.00 |
|
$ |
39,475 |
|
100.00 |
|
$ |
38,579 |
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
7,930 |
|
65.68 |
|
|
7,815 |
|
65.94 |
|
|
25,933 |
|
65.70 |
|
|
25,208 |
|
65.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
4,143 |
|
34.32 |
|
|
4,037 |
|
34.06 |
|
|
13,542 |
|
34.30 |
|
|
13,371 |
|
34.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
3,023 |
|
25.03 |
|
|
3,233 |
|
27.27 |
|
|
9,436 |
|
23.91 |
|
|
9,583 |
|
24.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
371 |
|
3.08 |
|
|
361 |
|
3.05 |
|
|
1,111 |
|
2.81 |
|
|
1,098 |
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest - net
|
|
114 |
|
0.95 |
|
|
91 |
|
0.77 |
|
|
313 |
|
0.79 |
|
|
269 |
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
3,508 |
|
29.06 |
|
|
3,685 |
|
31.09 |
|
|
10,860 |
|
27.51 |
|
|
10,950 |
|
28.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax earnings
|
|
635 |
|
5.26 |
|
|
352 |
|
2.97 |
|
|
2,682 |
|
6.79 |
|
|
2,421 |
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
239 |
|
1.98 |
|
|
127 |
|
1.07 |
|
|
1,012 |
|
2.56 |
|
|
904 |
|
2.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
$ |
396 |
|
3.28 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
1.90 |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
4.23 |
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ |
14,199 |
|
|
|
$ |
16,060 |
|
|
|
$ |
15,852 |
|
|
|
$ |
17,371 |
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(3,390 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,281 |
) |
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
$ |
13,602 |
|
|
|
$ |
16,109 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,602 |
|
|
|
$ |
16,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Millions, Except Percentage Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Net earnings
|
$ |
396 |
|
3.28 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
1.90 |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
4.23 |
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
8 |
|
0.07 |
|
|
(35 |
) |
(0.29 |
) |
|
7 |
|
0.02 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized investment(losses)/gains
|
|
(2 |
) |
(0.02 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
1 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
6 |
|
0.05 |
|
|
(36 |
) |
(0.29 |
) |
|
7 |
|
0.02 |
|
|
(7 |
) |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
$ |
402 |
|
3.33 |
|
$ |
189 |
|
1.61 |
|
$ |
1,677 |
|
4.25 |
|
$ |
1,510 |
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
1,171 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
(200 |
) |
Loss on property and other assets - net
|
|
69 |
|
|
407 |
|
Loss on equity method investments
|
|
38 |
|
|
7 |
|
Share-based payment expense
|
|
75 |
|
|
81 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise inventory - net
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
(669 |
) |
Other operating assets
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
119 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
892 |
|
Other operating liabilities
|
|
310 |
|
|
567 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
3,508 |
|
|
3,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
(1,200 |
) |
Proceeds from sale/maturity of investments
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
1,672 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
(947 |
) |
|
(1,264 |
) |
Change in equity method investments
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
(204 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and other long-term assets
|
|
105 |
|
|
26 |
|
Other - net
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
(13 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
(783 |
) |
|
(983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
- |
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
(28 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based payment plans
|
|
102 |
|
|
55 |
|
Cash dividend payments
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
(470 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
(3,643 |
) |
|
(2,434 |
) |
Other - net
|
|
11 |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
(2,650 |
) |
|
(2,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
77 |
|
|
23 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
652 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Note 1: Basis of Presentation - The accompanying consolidated financial statements (unaudited) and notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited) are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all the disclosures normally required in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The consolidated financial statements (unaudited), in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011, the results of operations and comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011 and cash flows for the nine months ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011.
These interim consolidated financial statements (unaudited) should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Lowe's Companies, Inc. (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2012 (the Annual Report). The financial results for the interim periods may not be indicative of the financial results for the entire fiscal year.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current classifications. Certain amounts within the consolidated statements of cash flows have been reclassified, including the loss on equity method investments and change in equity method investments, which are now presented as separate line items.
Note 2: Fair Value Measurements - Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements establishes a three-level hierarchy, which encourages an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
·
|
Level 1 - inputs to the valuation techniques that are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
|
·
|
Level 2 - inputs to the valuation techniques that are other than quoted prices but are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly
|
·
|
Level 3 - inputs to the valuation techniques that are unobservable for the assets or liabilities
|
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of November 2, 2012, October 28, 2011, and February 3, 2012, classified by fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
(In millions)
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Municipal floating rate obligations
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
61 |
|
|
- |
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
51 |
|
|
- |
|
Other
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
6 |
|
|
- |
|
Trading securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
$ |
118 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal floating rate obligations
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
278 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
72 |
|
|
- |
|
Total long-term investments
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
350 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
(In millions)
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Municipal floating rate obligations
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
32 |
|
|
- |
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
94 |
|
|
- |
|
Other
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Trading securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
$ |
126 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal floating rate obligations
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
513 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
174 |
|
|
- |
|
Other
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
18 |
|
|
- |
|
Total long-term investments
|
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
705 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
(In millions)
|
February 3, 2012
|
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Municipal floating rate obligations
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
25 |
|
|
- |
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
79 |
|
|
- |
|
Other
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Trading securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
$ |
104 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal floating rate obligations
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
363 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
122 |
|
|
- |
|
Other
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
19 |
|
|
- |
|
Total long-term investments
|
|
$ |
504 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
504 |
|
$ |
- |
|
When available, quoted prices were used to determine fair value. When quoted prices in active markets were available, investments were classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. When quoted prices in active markets were not available, fair values were determined using pricing models, and the inputs to those pricing models were based on observable market inputs. The inputs to the pricing models were typically benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads and benchmark securities, among others.
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
During the nine months ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011, the Company’s only significant assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition were certain assets subject to long-lived asset impairment.
The Company reviews the carrying amounts of long-lived assets whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. With input from retail store operations, the Company’s accounting and finance personnel that organizationally report to the chief financial officer, assess the performance of retail stores quarterly against historical patterns and projections of future profitability for evidence of possible impairment. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the asset (disposal) group is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The Company estimated the fair values of assets subject to long-lived asset impairment based on the Company’s own judgments about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets and on observable market data, when available. The Company classified these fair value measurements as Level 3.
In the determination of impairment for operating locations, the Company determined the fair values of individual operating locations using an income approach, which required discounting projected future cash flows. When determining the stream of projected future cash flows associated with an individual operating location, management made assumptions, incorporating local market conditions and inputs from retail store operations, about key variables including the following unobservable inputs: sales growth rates, gross margin, controllable expenses, such as payroll and occupancy expense, and asset residual values. In order to calculate the present value of those future cash flows, the Company discounted cash flow estimates at a rate commensurate with the risk that selected market participants would assign to the cash flows. In general, the selected market participants represented a group of other retailers with a location footprint similar in size to the Company’s.
During the nine months ended November 2, 2012, 11 operating locations experienced a triggering event and were evaluated for recoverability. Five of the 11 operating locations were determined to be impaired due to a decline in recent cash flow trends and an unfavorable sales outlook, resulting in an impairment loss of $54 million. The discounted cash flow model used to estimate the fair value of the impaired operating locations assumed average annual sales growth rates ranging from 2.0% to 4.0% over the remaining life of the locations and applied discount rates of approximately 6%.
The remaining six operating locations that experienced a triggering event during 2012 were determined to be recoverable and therefore were not impaired. For these six locations, the expected undiscounted cash flows substantially exceeded the net book value of the location’s assets. A 10% reduction in projected sales used to estimate future cash flows at the latest date these six operating locations were evaluated for impairment would have resulted in the impairment of four of these locations and increased recognized impairment losses by $47 million. We analyzed other assumptions made in estimating the future cash flows of the operating locations evaluated for impairment, but the sensitivity of those assumptions was not significant to the estimates.
In the determination of impairment for locations identified for closure and for excess properties held-for-use and held-for-sale, which consisted of retail outparcels and property associated with relocated or closed locations, the fair values were determined using a market approach based on estimated selling prices. The Company determined the estimated selling prices by obtaining information from property brokers or appraisers in the specific markets being evaluated or negotiated non-binding offers to purchase. The information obtained from property brokers or appraisers included comparable sales of similar assets and assumptions about demand in the market for these assets.
During the nine months ended November 2, 2012, the Company incurred total impairment charges of $18 million for 19 excess property locations. A 10% reduction in the estimated selling prices for these excess properties at the dates the locations were evaluated for impairment would have increased impairment losses by approximately $3 million.
The following tables present the Company’s non-financial assets measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the resulting long-lived asset impairment losses included in earnings, excluding costs to sell for excess properties held-for-sale. Because assets subject to long-lived asset impairment were not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, certain fair value measurements presented in the table may reflect values at earlier measurement dates and may no longer represent the fair values at November 2, 2012, and October 28, 2011.
Fair Value Measurements - Nonrecurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
Impairment
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
Impairment
Losses
|
|
(In millions)
|
Assets-held-for-use:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating locations
|
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
Locations identified for closure
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
52 |
|
|
(208 |
) |
Excess properties
|
|
1 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
56 |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Assets-held-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess properties
|
|
3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
$ |
115 |
|
$ |
(261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
Impairment
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
Impairment
Losses
|
|
(In millions)
|
Assets-held-for-use:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating locations
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
Locations identified for closure
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
73 |
|
|
(268 |
) |
Excess properties
|
|
32 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
78 |
|
|
(43 |
) |
Assets-held-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess properties
|
|
4 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
2 |
|
|
- |
|
Total
|
$ |
55 |
|
$ |
(72 |
) |
$ |
169 |
|
$ |
(351 |
) |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt and are reflected in the financial statements at cost. With the exception of long-term debt, cost approximates fair value for these items due to their short-term nature. The fair values of the Company’s unsecured notes classified as Level 1 were estimated using quoted market prices. The fair values of the Company’s mortgage notes classified as Level 2 were estimated using a discounted cash flow analyses, based on the future cash outflows associated with these arrangements and discounted using the applicable risk-free borrowing rate.
Carrying amounts and the related estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, excluding capitalized lease obligations, are as follows:
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
(In millions)
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Unsecured notes (Level 1)
|
|
$ |
8,626 |
|
|
$ |
10,160 |
|
|
$ |
6,194 |
|
|
$ |
7,027 |
|
Mortgage notes (Level 2)
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Long-term debt (excluding capitalized lease obligations)
|
|
$ |
8,645 |
|
|
$ |
10,183 |
|
|
$ |
6,215 |
|
|
$ |
7,052 |
|
Note 3: Restricted Investment Balances - Short-term and long-term investments include restricted balances pledged as collateral primarily for the Company’s extended protection plan program. At October 28, 2011 and February 3, 2012, short-term and long-term investments also included restricted balances pledged as collateral for a portion of the Company’s casualty insurance liability. Restricted balances included in short-term investments were $132 million at November 2, 2012, $186 million at October 28, 2011, and $233 million at February 3, 2012. Restricted balances included in long-term investments were $280 million at November 2, 2012, $273 million at October 28, 2011, and $262 million at February 3, 2012.
Note 4: Property - Property is shown net of accumulated depreciation of $13.3 billion at November 2, 2012, $12.2 billion at October 28, 2011, and $12.4 billion at February 3, 2012.
Note 5: Exit Activities - When locations under operating leases are closed, the Company recognizes a liability for the fair value of future contractual obligations, including future minimum lease payments, property taxes, utilities, common area maintenance and other ongoing expenses, net of estimated sublease income and other recoverable items. For the nine months ended November 2, 2012, the Company relocated one store subject to an operating lease. During 2011, the Company closed 13 stores subject to operating leases, which includes one store that was relocated.
The Company recognizes a liability in connection with one-time employee termination benefits when the Company commits to an exit plan and communicates that plan to the affected employees. In fiscal year 2011, the Company announced the closing of 27 stores, which required the accrual of one-time employee termination benefits.
Subsequent changes to the liability, including a change resulting from a revision to either the timing or the amount of estimated cash flows, are recognized in the period of change. Changes to the accrual for exit activities for the three and nine months ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011 are summarized as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Accrual for exit activities, balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
Additions to the accrual - net
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Accrual for exit activities, balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
Included in the accrual for exit activities for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2011 are charges associated with one-time employee termination benefits of $11 million and $16 million, respectively. There were no charges associated with one-time employee termination benefits for the three and nine months ended November 2, 2012.
Note 6: Extended Protection Plans - The Company sells separately-priced extended protection plan contracts under a Lowe’s-branded program for which the Company is ultimately self-insured. The Company recognizes revenue from extended protection plan sales on a straight-line basis over the respective contract term. Extended protection plan contract terms primarily range from one to four years from the date of purchase or the end of the manufacturer’s warranty, as applicable. Changes in deferred revenue for extended protection plan contracts are summarized as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Deferred revenue - extended protection plans, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
Additions to deferred revenue
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Deferred revenue recognized
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
Deferred revenue - extended protection plans, end of period
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
Incremental direct acquisition costs associated with the sale of extended protection plans are also deferred and recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the respective contract term. Deferred costs associated with extended protection plan contracts were $110 million at November 2, 2012, $153 million at October 28, 2011, and $145 million at February 3, 2012. The Company’s extended protection plan deferred costs are included in other assets (noncurrent) on the consolidated balance sheets. All other costs, such as costs of services performed under the contract, general and administrative expenses and advertising expenses are expensed as incurred.
The liability for extended protection plan claims incurred is included in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the liability for extended protection plan claims are summarized as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Liability for extended protection plan claims, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
Accrual for claims incurred
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Claim payments
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Liability for extended protection plan claims, end of period
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
Note 7: Long-Term Debt - In April 2012, the Company issued $2.0 billion of unsecured notes in three tranches: $500 million of 1.625% notes maturing in April 2017 (the 2017 Notes), $750 million of 3.12% notes maturing in April 2022 (the 2022 Notes) and $750 million of 4.65% notes maturing in April 2042 (the 2042 Notes). The 2017, 2022 and 2042 notes were issued at discounts of approximately $2 million, $4 million and $10 million, respectively. Interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears in April and October of each year until maturity, beginning in October 2012.
The discounts associated with these issuances are included in long-term debt and are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes.
The indentures governing these notes contain a provision that allows the Company to redeem the notes at any time, in whole or in part, at specified redemption prices plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. The indentures also contain a provision that allows the holders of the notes to require the Company to repurchase all or any part of their notes if a change of control triggering event (as defined in the Indenture) occurs. If elected under the change of control provisions, the repurchase of the notes will occur at a purchase price of 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on such notes to the date of purchase. The indentures governing the notes do not limit the aggregate principal amount of debt securities that the Company may issue and do not require the Company to maintain
specified financial ratios or levels of net worth or liquidity. However, the indentures include various restrictive covenants, none of which is expected to impact the Company’s liquidity or capital resources.
During the third quarter of 2012, $550 million of unsecured debt matured and was re-paid with cash from operations and investing activities.
Note 8: Shareholders' Equity - The Company has a share repurchase program that is executed through purchases made from time to time either in the open market or through private transactions. Shares purchased under the repurchase program are retired and returned to authorized and unissued status. On August 19, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a $5.0 billion share repurchase program with no expiration. At November 2, 2012, the Company had remaining authorization under the share repurchase program of $900 million.
The Company also withholds shares from employees to satisfy either the exercise price of stock options exercised or the statutory withholding tax liability resulting from the vesting of restricted stock awards.
Shares repurchased for the three and nine months ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost 1
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Share repurchase program
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Shares withheld from employees
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total share repurchases
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost 2
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost 2
|
|
Share repurchase program
|
|
|
124.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
Shares withheld from employees
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total share repurchases
|
|
|
125.9 |
|
|
$ |
3,643 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,436 |
|
1 A reduction of $813 million was recorded to retained earnings, after capital in excess of par value was depleted, for the three months ended November 2, 2012.
2 Reductions of $3.4 billion and $2.3 billion were recorded to retained earnings, after capital in excess of par value was depleted, for the nine months ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011, respectively.
Note 9: Income Taxes - The Company is subject to examination by various foreign and domestic taxing authorities. During the three months ended November 2, 2012, the Company settled IRS adjustments for insurance deductions and other items regarding exam periods 2004 through 2007 which were effectively settled as of August 3, 2012. As a result of this event, as well as the settlement of certain state items, the Company recognized a reduction of $22 million in interest expense. At November 2, 2012, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $4 million. There are also ongoing U.S. state audits covering tax years 2003 through 2010. The Company believes appropriate provisions for all outstanding issues have been made for all jurisdictions and all open years.
Note 10: Earnings Per Share - The Company calculates basic and diluted earnings per common share using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, net earnings are allocated to each class of common stock and participating security as if all of the net earnings for the period had been distributed. The Company’s participating securities consist of share-based payment awards that contain a nonforfeitable right to receive dividends and therefore are considered to participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders.
Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing net earnings allocable to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net earnings allocable to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares as of the balance sheet date, as adjusted for the potential dilutive effect of non-participating share-based awards. The following table reconciles earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011.
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
Less: Net earnings allocable to participating securities
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Net earnings allocable to common shares
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
1,659 |
|
|
$ |
1,505 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
Less: Net earnings allocable to participating securities
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Net earnings allocable to common shares
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
1,659 |
|
|
$ |
1,505 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
Dilutive effect of non-participating share-based awards
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Weighted-average common shares, as adjusted
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
Stock options to purchase 8.2 million and 18.0 million shares of common stock for the three months ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Stock options to purchase 8.4 million and 18.4 million shares of common stock for the nine months ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 11: Supplemental Disclosure
Net interest expense is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Interest on tax uncertainties
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Interest - net
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized
|
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net
|
|
$ |
1,059 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash property acquisitions, including assets acquired under capital lease
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
Cash dividends declared but not paid
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Lowe’s Companies, Inc.
Mooresville, North Carolina
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of current and retained earnings and comprehensive income for the fiscal three-month and nine-month periods ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011, and of cash flows for the fiscal nine-month periods ended November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011. These consolidated interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of February 3, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the fiscal year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated April 2, 2012, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of February 3, 2012 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
December 4, 2012
Table of Contents
Item 2.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our consolidated operating results, liquidity and capital resources during the three and nine months ended November 2, 2012, and October 28, 2011. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements that are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2012 (the Annual Report), as well as the consolidated financial statements (unaudited) and notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited) contained in this report. Unless otherwise specified, all comparisons made are to the corresponding period of 2011. In fiscal 2012, there is a one week shift as a result of the 53rd week in 2011. For the purposes of the following discussion, comparable store sales, comparable store average ticket and comparable store customer transactions are based on comparable 13-week and 39-week periods. This discussion and analysis is presented in seven sections:
·
|
Lowe’s Business Outlook
|
·
|
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
·
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
·
|
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
|
·
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
|
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
We delivered solid results in the third quarter, and our level of execution is improving as we make further progress on our initiatives. During the third quarter, comparable store sales increased 1.8%, with a slight increase in comparable transactions and a 1.6% increase in comparable average ticket. Comparable store sales increased in 12 of our 14 product categories, with nearly two-thirds of product categories generating comparable store sales above the company average including large ticket categories such as Cabinets & Countertops and Appliances. We also continued to see strength in our commercial business which outperformed the company average in the third quarter.
We remain keenly focused on improving our core business. Our most immediate priority is to improve our product sales business model through our Value Improvement program, which improves our product line designs, making them more relevant to each of the markets we serve. This includes reducing duplication of features and function within price points and reinvesting inventory in key high velocity items customers expect us to have in stock. We are also working to lower first costs through more disciplined line reviews and by redirecting vendor promotional and marketing support dollars to lower unit costs. In addition, through Product Differentiation, we have revised many of our end-cap locations to highlight innovative new products and significant values leading into a department and revamped the promotional spaces to highlight seasonally relevant high value items.
Though there has been recent news regarding improvements in the housing market, overall, consumers remain cautiously optimistic. Homeowners have indicated their spending is staying the same or declining compared to a year ago, due primarily to lack of income growth or reluctance to use financing. Therefore, we expect the majority of consumer projects planned in the next three months to be for tickets less than $500. This further underscores the importance of our efforts around Value Improvement and Product Differentiation to drive transactions.
OPERATIONS
The following tables set forth the percentage relationship to net sales of each line item of the consolidated statements of earnings (unaudited), as well as the percentage change in dollar amounts from the prior period. These tables should be read in conjunction with the following discussion and analysis and the consolidated financial statements (unaudited), including the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Basis Point Increase / (Decrease) in Percentage of Net Sales from Prior Period
|
|
|
Percentage Increase / (Decrease) in Dollar Amounts from Prior Period
|
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011 |
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Gross margin
|
|
|
34.32 |
|
|
|
34.06 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
25.03 |
|
|
|
27.27 |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Depreciation
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Interest - net
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
29.06 |
|
|
|
31.09 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Pre-tax earnings
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
88.4 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
% |
EBIT margin1
|
|
|
6.21 |
% |
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
69.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Basis Point Increase / (Decrease) in Percentage of Net Sales from Prior Period
|
|
|
Percentage Increase / (Decrease) in Dollar Amounts from Prior Period
|
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
|
|
2012 vs. 2011
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Gross margin
|
|
|
34.30 |
|
|
|
34.66 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
23.91 |
|
|
|
24.84 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Depreciation
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Interest - net
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
27.51 |
|
|
|
28.38 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Pre-tax earnings
|
|
|
6.79 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
EBIT margin1
|
|
|
7.58 |
% |
|
|
6.98 |
% |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Other Metrics
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Comparable store sales increase/(decrease) 2, 3
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
Total customer transactions (in millions) 4
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
Average ticket 4, 5
|
|
$ |
63.11 |
|
|
$ |
61.84 |
|
|
$ |
62.94 |
|
|
$ |
62.28 |
|
At end of period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of stores
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales floor square feet (in millions)
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average store size selling square feet (in thousands) 6
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital 7
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
EBIT margin, also referred to as operating margin, is defined as earnings before interest and taxes as a percentage of sales.
|
2
|
Comparable store sales are based on comparable 13-week and 39-week periods.
|
3
|
A comparable store is defined as a store that has been open longer than 13 months. A store that is identified for relocation is no longer considered comparable one month prior to its relocation. The relocated store must then remain open longer than 13 months to be considered comparable. A store we have decided to close is no longer considered comparable as of the beginning of the month in which we announce its closing.
|
4
|
In fiscal 2012, there is a one-week shift as a result of the 53rd week in 2011.
|
5
|
Average ticket is defined as net sales divided by the total number of customer transactions.
|
6
|
Average store size selling square feet is defined as sales floor square feet divided by the number of stores open at the end of the period.
|
7
|
Return on invested capital is a non-GAAP financial measure. See below for additional information.
|
Return on Invested Capital
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is considered a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe ROIC is a meaningful metric for investors because it measures how effectively the Company uses capital to generate profits.
We define ROIC as trailing four quarters’ net operating profit after tax divided by the average of ending debt and equity for the last five quarters. Although ROIC is a common financial metric, numerous methods exist for calculating ROIC. Accordingly, the method used by our management to calculate ROIC may differ from the methods other companies use to calculate their ROIC. We encourage you to understand the methods used by another company to calculate its ROIC before comparing its ROIC to ours.
We consider return on average debt and equity to be the financial measure computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to ROIC. The difference between these two measures is that ROIC adjusts net earnings to exclude tax adjusted interest expense.
The calculation of ROIC, together with a reconciliation to the calculation of return on average debt and equity, the most comparable GAAP financial measure, is as follows:
(In millions, except percentage data)
|
For the periods ended
|
|
Calculation of Return on Invested Capital
|
November 2, 2012
|
|
|
October 28, 2011
|
|
Numerator 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
$ |
1,993 |
|
|
$ |
1,802 |
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense - net
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
Earnings before interest and taxes
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax adjustment 2
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
Net operating profit after tax
|
$ |
2,254 |
|
|
$ |
2,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
37.4 |
% |
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average debt and equity 3
|
$ |
24,019 |
|
|
$ |
24,002 |
|
Return on invested capital
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Return on Average Debt and Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
$ |
1,993 |
|
|
$ |
1,802 |
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average debt and equity 3
|
$ |
24,019 |
|
|
$ |
24,002 |
|
Return on average debt and equity
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
1 Amounts used in the calculation of the numerator are based on the trailing four quarters.
2 Income tax adjustment is defined as earnings before interest and taxes multiplied by the effective tax rate.
3 Average debt and equity is defined as average debt, including current maturities and short-term borrowings, plus total equity for the last five quarters.
Net Sales – Net sales increased 1.9% to $12.1 billion in the third quarter of 2012. There was a one-week shift in fiscal 2012 as a result of the 53rd week in 2011, which negatively impacted net sales comparisons by $62 million or 0.5%. Comparable store sales increased 1.8% over the same period, primarily driven by a 1.6% increase in comparable store average ticket. Comparable store customer transactions increased 0.2% over the same period. Our key initiatives, Value Improvement and Product Differentiation, drove an estimated 50 basis points of comparable store sales in the quarter, with an additional 40 basis points of the increase due to our proprietary credit value proposition, which offers customers the choice of 5% off every day or promotional financing. We estimate that total sales related to Hurricane Isaac and Hurricane Sandy in the current year were essentially offset by comparisons to sales related to Hurricane Irene in the prior year.
During the quarter, we experienced comparable store sales increases above twice the company average in the following categories: Lumber, Tools & Outdoor Power Equipment, Lawn & Garden, and Cabinets & Countertops.
The above-average comparable store sales increases in Lumber was driven primarily by inflation, while Tools and Outdoor Power Equipment benefited from storm preparations during the last week of the quarter when we supplied large quantities of generators, flashlights, and batteries to customers preparing for Hurricane Sandy. Lawn & Garden experienced increases due to strong inventory planning and improved attachment rates, which drove strong sales in live
goods, fertilizer, soil, rocks and mulch. We experienced above-average comparable store sales increases in Cabinets & Countertops due to promotions that drove incremental sales.
Building Materials experienced double-digit negative comparable store sales as a result of difficult comparisons to prior year storm recovery efforts.
Net sales increased 2.3% to $39.5 billion for the first nine months of 2012 compared to 2011, while comparable store sales increased 1.3% over the same period. The proprietary credit value proposition positively impacted comparable store sales by 72 basis points. In addition, the one-week shift aided net sales by $192 million, contributing 0.5% of the net sales increase.
Gross Margin – For the third quarter of 2012, gross margin increased 26 basis points as a percentage of sales. Gross margin was positively impacted 14 basis points by inflation, along with favorable distribution costs attributing 10 basis points of the increase. Our Value Improvement Program also aided gross margin by approximately 10 basis points as we more effectively managed promotional activity and began to realize the benefits from our product line review resets. These were slightly offset by our proprietary credit value proposition which negatively impacted gross margin by nine basis points.
In the first nine months of 2012 compared to 2011, gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased 36 basis points, primarily due to the impact of our proprietary credit value proposition, along with pricing and promotional activity. These items were slightly offset by increases associated with product mix and favorable distribution costs.
SG&A – For the third quarter of 2012, SG&A expense leveraged 224 basis points as a percentage of sales compared to the third quarter of 2011. This was primarily driven by leverage of 257 basis points due to long-lived asset impairments and other costs associated with the 27 store closures and discontinued projects in the prior year. We also experienced nine basis points of leverage associated with our proprietary credit program, which was driven by higher portfolio income. These were slightly offset by 22 basis points of deleverage in contract labor associated with information technology projects to improve customer experiences. In addition, we experienced 19 basis points of deleverage associated with casualty insurance, primarily driven by a reduction in the discount rate applied by 100 basis points in the quarter, along with 13 basis points of deleverage associated with incentive compensation, due to higher attainment levels compared to targets for store-based employees relative to last year.
In the first nine months of 2012 compared to 2011, SG&A as a percentage of sales decreased 93 basis points, driven primarily by 101 basis points of leverage due to long-lived asset impairments and other costs associated with the 27 store closures and discontinued projects in the prior year. We also experienced 36 basis points of leverage associated with our proprietary credit program, offset by 12 basis points of deleverage in contract labor, 10 basis points of deleverage in casualty insurance, and 10 basis points of deleverage in incentive compensation for store-based employees, for similar reasons as described above.
Depreciation – Depreciation expense deleveraged three basis points for the third quarter compared to the prior year due to IT capital investments made to improve customer experiences. Property, less accumulated depreciation, decreased to $21.6 billion at November 2, 2012 compared to $21.9 billion at October 28, 2011. As of November 2, 2012 and October 28, 2011, we owned 89% of our stores, which included stores on leased land.
Depreciation expense leveraged three basis points in the first nine months of 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to increased sales, offset by higher depreciation associated with IT capital investments made to improve customer experiences.
Interest – Net – Interest expense was $114 million and deleveraged 18 basis points as a percentage of sales for the third quarter compared to the prior year primarily due to the issuance of $1 billion and $2 billion of unsecured notes in November 2011 and April 2012, respectively.
Interest expense deleveraged nine basis points as a percentage of sales for the first nine months of 2012 as compared to 2011. The increase in expense was due to many of the same factors that impacted interest expense in the third quarter, partially offset by tax settlements that resulted in a reduced interest accrual of $22 million in the second quarter of 2012.
Income Tax Provision – Our effective income tax rates was 37.6% and 37.7% for the three and nine months ended November 2, 2012, respectively, and 36.0% and 37.3% for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2011, respectively. The lower effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2011 were attributable to the benefit of a one-time federal employee retention tax credit and the favorable settlement of certain state tax matters in the third quarter of 2011. Our effective income tax rate was 36.7% for fiscal 2011.
LOWE’S BUSINESS OUTLOOK
All comparisons are with fiscal 2011, a 53-week year.
As of November 19, 2012, the date of our third quarter 2012 earnings release, our fiscal year 2012 guidance expected total sales to be flat, which includes the 53rd week in fiscal 2011. We expected to open approximately 10 stores during 2012. Earnings before interest and taxes as a percentage of sales (operating margin) were expected to increase approximately 40 basis points. In addition, depreciation expense was expected to be approximately $1.5 billion and the effective income tax rate was expected to be approximately 37.7%. Diluted earnings per share of $1.64 were expected for fiscal 2012.
On a 52 versus 52-week basis, total sales were expected to increase approximately 2%. We expected comparable store sales to increase approximately 1% in fiscal 2012.
We repurchased $3.6 billion under our share repurchase program in the first nine months of fiscal 2012. Our guidance assumed approximately $550 million in additional share repurchases for a total of $4.15 billion for the fiscal year.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
Cash flows from operating activities continued to provide the primary source of our liquidity. However, net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended November 2, 2012 decreased from the nine months ended October 28, 2011, primarily due to changes in working capital. The change in working capital was primarily driven by the timing of tax payments. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended November 2, 2012, versus the nine months ended October 28, 2011, was driven by a decrease in capital expenditures in addition to an increase in proceeds received from the sale of property and other long-term assets, partially offset by a decrease in net sale activity related to investments. The decrease in net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended November 2, 2012, versus the nine months ended October 28, 2011 was driven primarily by the issuance of $2.0 billion of unsecured notes in April 2012. This was partially offset by an increase in repayments of long-term debt and cash used to repurchase shares, which included shares repurchased under our share repurchase program and shares withheld from employees to satisfy statutory tax withholding liabilities upon vesting of restricted stock awards.
Sources of Liquidity
In addition to our cash flows from operations, liquidity is provided by our short-term borrowing facilities. We have a $1.75 billion senior credit facility that expires in October 2016. The senior credit facility supports our commercial paper program and has a $500 million letter of credit sublimit. Letters of credit issued pursuant to the senior credit facility reduce the amount available for borrowing under its terms. Borrowings made are unsecured and are priced at fixed rates based upon market conditions at the time of funding in accordance with the terms of the senior credit facility. The senior credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants, which include maintenance of a debt leverage ratio as defined by the senior credit facility. We were in compliance with those covenants at November 2, 2012. Thirteen banking institutions are participating in the senior credit facility. There were no outstanding borrowings or letters of credit under the senior credit facility and no outstanding borrowings under our commercial paper program at November 2, 2012.
We expect to continue to have access to the capital markets on both short- and long-term bases when needed for liquidity purposes by issuing commercial paper or new long-term debt. The availability and the borrowing costs of these funds could be adversely affected, however, by a downgrade of our debt ratings or a deterioration of certain financial ratios.
The table below reflects our debt ratings by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and Moody’s as of December 4, 2012, which we are disclosing to enhance understanding of our sources of liquidity and the effect of our ratings on our cost of funds. Although we currently do not expect a downgrade in our debt ratings, our commercial paper and senior debt ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Debt Ratings
|
S&P
|
Moody’s
|
|
Commercial Paper
|
A-2 |
P-2 |
|
Senior Debt
|
A- |
A3 |
|
Senior Debt Outlook
|
Negative
|
Stable
|
|
We believe that net cash provided by operating and financing activities will be adequate not only for our operating requirements, but also for our expansion plans, investments in our existing stores, investments in information technology, repurchases of shares of common stock and acquisitions, if any, over the next 12 months. There are no provisions in any agreements that would require early cash settlement of existing debt or leases as a result of a downgrade in our debt rating or a decrease in our stock price. In addition, we do not have a significant amount of cash held in foreign affiliates that would not be available to fund domestic operations.
Cash Requirements
Capital expenditures
Our fiscal 2012 capital expenditures budget is approximately $1.35 billion, inclusive of approximately $50 million of lease commitments, resulting in planned net cash outflow of $1.3 billion. Approximately 40% of the planned net cash outflow is for investments to enhance the customer experience, inclusive of enhancements in information technology. Existing stores account for approximately 30% of planned net cash outflow including investments in store resets and remerchandising. In addition, approximately 20% of the planned net cash outflow is for store expansion. Our expansion plans for 2012 consist of approximately 10 stores, all of which are expected to be owned. Approximately 40% of the stores are expected to be on leased land. Other planned capital expenditures, accounting for approximately 10% of planned net cash outflow, are for investments in our distribution network, including one additional regional distribution center.
Debt and capital
In April 2012, we issued $2.0 billion of unsecured notes in three tranches: $500 million of 1.625% notes maturing in April 2017 (the 2017 Notes), $750 million of 3.12% notes maturing in April 2022 (the 2022 Notes) and $750 million of 4.65% notes maturing in April 2042 (the 2042 Notes). Net proceeds from the 2017, 2022 and 2042 notes were approximately $498 million, $746 million, and $740 million, respectively.
We have a share repurchase program that is executed through purchases made from time to time in the open market or through private transactions. Shares purchased under the share repurchase program are retired and returned to authorized and unissued status. As of November 2, 2012, we had a remaining repurchase authorization of $900 million with no expiration date. We expect to utilize $550 million of the remaining authorization by the end of fiscal 2012, and the remaining $350 million in fiscal 2013.
During the third quarter of 2012, $550 million of unsecured debt matured and was re-paid with cash from operations and investing activities.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Other than in connection with executing operating leases, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing that has, or is reasonably likely to have, a material, current or future effect on our financial condition, cash flows, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
In April 2012, we issued $2.0 billion of unsecured notes in the ordinary course of business, which are included in the table below that summarizes long-term debt, excluding capital leases and other, at November 2, 2012. The unsecured notes are further described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited) included herein.
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
4-5 |
|
After 5
|
|
(In millions)
|
Total
|
|
1 Year
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
Long-term debt (principal amounts, excluding discount)
|
$ |
8,702 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
510 |
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
$ |
6,412 |
|
Long-term debt (interest payments)
|
$ |
6,829 |
|
$ |
414 |
|
$ |
828 |
|
$ |
729 |
|
$ |
4,858 |
|
Total
|
$ |
15,531 |
|
$ |
416 |
|
$ |
1,338 |
|
$ |
2,507 |
|
$ |
11,270 |
|
As of November 2, 2012, there were no other material changes to our contractual obligations and commercial commitments outside the ordinary course of business since the end of 2011. Refer to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our contractual obligations and commercial commitments.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements presented in our Annual Report. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Annual Report. Our significant and critical accounting policies have not changed significantly since the filing of our Annual Report.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act"). Statements of the Company's expectations for sales growth, comparable store sales, earnings and performance, shareholder value, capital expenditures, cash flows, store openings, the housing market, the home improvement industry, demand for services, share repurchases, the Company’s strategic initiatives and any statement of an assumption underlying any of the foregoing, constitute "forward-looking statements" under the Act. Such forward-looking statements are found in, among other places, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Statements containing words such as “expects,” “plans,” “strategy,” “projects,” “believes,” “opportunity,” “anticipates,” “desires,” and similar expressions are intended to highlight or indicate “forward-looking statements.” Although we believe that the expectations, opinions, projections, and comments reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such statements will prove to be correct. A wide variety of potential risks, uncertainties, and other factors could materially affect our ability to achieve the results either expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, changes in general economic conditions, such as continued high rates of unemployment, interest rate and currency fluctuations, higher fuel and other energy costs, slower growth in personal income, changes in consumer spending, changes in the rate of housing turnover, the availability and increasing regulation of consumer credit and of mortgage financing, inflation or deflation of commodity prices, the pending combination of expiring tax cuts and mandatory reductions in federal spending at the end of 2012 and other factors which can negatively affect our customers, as well as our ability to: (i) respond to adverse trends in the housing industry, such as the psychological effects of lower home prices, and in the level of repairs, remodeling, and additions to existing homes, as well as a general reduction in commercial building activity; (ii) secure, develop, and otherwise implement new technologies and processes designed to enhance our efficiency and competitiveness; (iii) attract, train, and retain highly-qualified associates; (iv) manage our business effectively as we adapt our traditional operating model to meet the changing expectations of our customers; (v) to maintain, improve, upgrade and protect our critical information systems; (vi) respond to fluctuations in the prices and availability of services, supplies, and products; (vii) respond to the growth and impact of competition; (viii) address changes in existing or new laws or regulations that affect consumer credit, employment/labor, trade, product safety, transportation/logistics, energy costs, health care, tax or environmental issues; and (ix) respond to unanticipated weather conditions that could adversely affect sales. In addition, we could experience additional impairment losses if the actual results of our operating stores are not consistent with the
assumptions and judgments we have made in estimating future cash flows and determining asset fair values. For more information about these and other risks and uncertainties that we are exposed to, you should read the "Risk Factors" and "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the description of material changes therein or updated version thereof, if any, included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are based upon data available as of the date of this report or other specified date and speak only as of such date. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf about any of the matters covered in this report are qualified by these cautionary statements and the “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K to the SEC and the description of material changes, if any, therein included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, change in circumstances, future events, or otherwise.
The Company's market risk has not changed materially from that disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2012.
The Company's management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act)). Based upon their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of November 2, 2012, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In addition, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended November 2, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Part II – OTHER INFORMATION
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2012.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases of the Company’s common stock made during the third quarter of 2012:
(In millions, except average price paid per share)
|
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased 1
|
|
|
Average Price Paid
per Share
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs 2
|
|
|
Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs 2
|
|
August 4, 2012 - August 31, 2012
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
27.85 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
September 1, 2012 - October 5, 2012
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
29.20 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
October 6, 2012 - November 2, 2012
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
32.08 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
900 |
|
As of November 2, 2012
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.68 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
1 During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 29.7 million shares of its common stock. The total number of shares purchased also includes 0.1 million shares withheld from employees to satisfy either the exercise price of stock options or their statutory withholding tax liability upon the vesting of restricted share-based awards.
2 Authorization for up to $5.0 billion of share repurchases with no expiration was approved on August 19, 2011 by the Company’s Board of Directors. Although the repurchase authorization has no expiration, the Company expects to execute $550 million of the program by the end of fiscal 2012 and the remaining $350 million in fiscal 2013 through purchases made from time to time either in the open market or through private transactions in accordance with SEC regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit(s)
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Charter of Lowe's Companies, Inc.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-07898
|
|
3.1
|
|
September 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Lowe's Companies, Inc., as amended and restated.
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-07898
|
|
3.1
|
|
August 27, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amendment No. 9 to the Lowe's Companies, Inc 401(k) Plan.*‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Statement Re Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Deloitte & Touche LLP Letter Re Unaudited Interim Financial Information.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.‡
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‡
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
†
|
|
Furnished herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
December 4, 2012
Date
|
|
/s/ Matthew V. Hollifield
Matthew V. Hollifield
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
|