Page 1

FORM 10 Q

X Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Or

___ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period for _______________ to _______________

Northeast Bancorp
__________________________________________________________________________________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(207) 786-3245
___________________________________________________________________________
Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Not Applicable
___________________________________________________________________________
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subjected to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one): Large accelerated filer __

Accelerated filer __ Non-accelerated filer X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes_ No X

Page 2

Page 7

1.  Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed and consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting principally of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company's financial position at September 30, 2006, the results of operations for the three month period ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the changes in stockholders' equity for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. Operating results for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain June 30, 2006 amounts have been reclassified to be consistent with the September 30, 2006 financial statements.

2.   Junior Subordinated Notes

NBN Capital Trust II and III were created in December 2003 and NBN Capital Trust IV was created December 2004. Each such trust is a Delaware statutory trust (together, the "Private Trusts"). The exclusive purpose of the Private Trusts was (i) issuing and selling Common Securities and Preferred Securities in a private placement offering, (ii) using the proceeds of the sale of the Private Trust Preferred Securities to acquire Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Notes ("Junior Subordinated Notes"); and (iii) engaging only in those other activities necessary, convenient, or incidental thereto. Accordingly the Junior Subordinated Notes are the sole assets of each of the Private Trusts.

The following table summarizes the junior subordinated notes issued by the Company to each affiliated trust and the trust preferred and common securities issued by each affiliated trust. Amounts include the junior subordinated notes acquired by the affiliated trusts from us with the capital contributed by us in exchange for the common securities of such trust. The trust preferred securities were sold in two separate private placement offerings. The company has the right to redeem the junior subordinated notes, in whole or in part, on or after March 30, 2009 for NBN Capital Trust II and III, and on or after February 23, 2010, for NBN Capital Trust IV at the redemption price specified in the Indenture plus accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date.

NBN Capital Trust II pays a variable rate based on three month LIBOR, NBN Capital Trust III pays a 6.50% fixed rate until March 30, 2009 when the rate changes to a variable rate based on three month LIBOR, and NBN Capital Trust IV pays a 5.88% fixed rate until February 23, 2010 when the rate changes to a variable rate based on three month LIBOR. Accordingly, the Preferred Securities of the Private Trusts currently pay quarterly distributions at an annual rate of 8.17% for the stated liquidation amount of $1,000 per Preferred Security for NBN Capital Trust II, an annual rate of 6.50% for the stated liquidation amount of $1,000 per Preferred Security for NBN Capital Trust III and an annual rate of 5.88% for the stated liquidation amount of $1,000 per Preferred Security for NBN Capital Trust IV. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of the obligations of each trust. The guaranty covers the quarterly distributions and payments on liquidation or redemption of the Private Trust Preferred Securities, but only to the extent of funds held by the trusts. Based on the current rates, the annual interest expense is approximately $1,059,971.

Page 8

3.  Loans

The following is a summary of the composition of loans at:

4.  Allowance for Loan Losses

The following is an analysis of transactions in the allowance for loan losses:

5.  Securities

Securities available for sale at cost and approximate market values and maturities are summarized below:

Page 9

6.  Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank

A summary of borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank is as follows:

The Federal Home Loan Bank has the option to call $18,000,000 of the outstanding advances at September 30, 2006. The options are continuously callable quarterly until maturity.

Page 10

7.  Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in note 14 of the June 30, 2006 audited consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (revised 2004), Shared-Based Payment ("SFAS 123-R"), effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2005, superseding APB Opinion 25 and replacing FASB Statement No. 123. Prior to July 1, 2005, the Company utilized the intrinsic value methodology allowed by APB Opinion 25. SFAS 123-R requires companies to measure and record compensation expense for stock options and other share-based payments based on the instruments' fair value reduced by expected forfeitures. Under the modified prospective approach adopted by the Company, the Company recognizes expense for new options awarded and to awards modified, repurchased or canceled after the effective date. Since there were no new options granted (or modifications of existing options) during three months ended September 30,2006 and since all previously granted options were fully vested at the grant date, adoption of SFAS 123-R had no impact on the September 30, 2006 financial statements.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.

8. Capital Lease

The principal executive and administrative offices of the Company and the Bank were relocated to 500 Canal Street, Lewiston, Maine ("Headquarters Building") from 158 Court Street, Auburn, Maine in August, 2005. The Bank entered into a fifteen year lease with respect to the Headquarters Building and moved our principal executive and administrative offices to this four story building located in downtown Lewiston along with consolidating our operations, loan processing and underwriting, loan servicing, accounting, human resources, and commercial lending departments. We lease the entire building, a total of 27,000 square feet. Since the present value of the lease payments over the fifteen years ($264,262 per year for each of the initial ten years of the lease term and $305,987 per year for each of the last five years) exceeded 90% of the fair value of the property, we recorded a capital lease of $2,892,702 in Premises and Equipment and an Obligation under Capital Lease Agreement with the Company's other long-term debt. The Obligation under Capital Lease was $2,750,042 and $2,781,046 at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively. The capital lease asset is being amortized over the lease term.

Page 11

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition presents a review of the results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 and the financial condition at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006. This discussion and analysis is intended to assist in understanding the results of operations and financial condition of Northeast Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Northeast Bank. Accordingly, this section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other statistical information contained herein. See Form 10-K dated as of June 30, 2006 for discussion of the critical accounting policies of the Company.

A Note about Forward Looking Statements

This report contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of federal securities law Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as statements relating to our financial condition, prospective results of operations, future performance or expectations, plans, objectives, prospects, loan loss allowance adequacy, simulation of changes in interest rates, capital spending and finance sources, and revenue sources. These statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical facts. Accordingly, statements that are based on management's projections, estimates, assumptions, and judgments constitute forward-looking statements. These forward looking statements, which are based on various assumptions (some of which are beyond the Company's control), may be identified by reference to a future period or periods, or by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believe", "expect", "estimate", "anticipate", "continue", "plan", "approximately", "intend", "objective", "goal", "project", or other similar terms or variations on those terms, or the future or conditional verbs such as "will", "may", "should", "could", and "would". In addition, the Company may from time to time make such oral or written "forward-looking statements" in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including exhibits thereto), in its reports to shareholders, and in other communications made by or with the approval of the Company.

Such forward-looking statements reflect our current views and expectations based largely on information currently available to our management, and on our current expectations, assumptions, plans, estimates, judgments, and projections about our business and our industry, and they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable estimates and assumptions, they are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors. Accordingly, we cannot give you any assurance that our expectations will, in fact, occur or that our estimates or assumptions will be correct. We caution you that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, those related to the economic environment, particularly in the market areas in which the Company operates, competitive products and pricing, fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. Government, changes in government regulations affecting financial institutions, including regulatory fees and capital requirements, changes in prevailing interest rates, acquisitions and the integration of acquired businesses, credit risk management, asset/liability management, changes in technology, changes in the securities markets, and the availability of and the costs associated with sources of liquidity. Accordingly, investors and others are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. For a more complete discussion of certain risks and uncertainties affecting the Company, please see "Item 1. Business - Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors" set forth in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report and we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview of Operations

This Overview is intended to provide a context for the following Management's Discussion and Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition, and should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements, including the notes there to, in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, as well as our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed on Form 10-K with the SEC. We have attempted to identify the most important matters on which our management focuses in evaluating our financial condition and operating performance and the short-term and long-term opportunities, challenges, and risks (including material trends and uncertainties) which we face. We also discuss the action we are taking to address these opportunities, challenges, and risks. The Overview is not intended as a summary of, or a substitute for review of, Management's Discussion and Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition. For comparative purposes, certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on net income.

Northeast Bank is faced with two challenges: growing earning assets and improving net interest margins.

Earning assets have increased compared to June 30, 2006. This increase was attributable to increases in loans and investment securities. While competition for commercial real estate and small commercial loans is intense, we are originating loans that are properly priced for risk and not competing for relationships where we believe transactions do not reflect pricing or structure for risk.

We expect an overall increase in commercial real estate and commercial loan originations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. Margins on loans are better than investment securities given the current flat yield curve. Consequently, we expect purchases of investment securities will be minimal during this fiscal year.

Net interest margins are expected to decline. As of June 30, 2006, the balance sheet shifted to being slightly liability sensitive from being asset sensitive. A liability sensitive balance sheet results from cost of interest-bearing liabilities repricing more quickly than the yield of interest-bearing assets. The competition for deposits and the relative high cost of attracting new deposits is expected to increase the overall cost of funds and expected to cause net interest margins to decline. Our certificates of deposits are expected to reprice to interest rates slightly higher than one year ago. The prime rate changes through June 30, 2006 that had kept our yields on interest-bearing assets increasing faster than the cost of interest-bearing deposits improving our margins did not occur the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The prospect of additional increases in prime rate is low so we expect new loan originations to improve yields. To reduce interest rate risk, we are extending the maturities of FHLB advances and brokered time deposits.

Management believes that the allowance for loan loss as of September 30, 2006 was adequate, under present conditions, for credit risk known in the loan portfolio. Non-accrual loans decreased slightly compared to June 30, 2006.

Opportunities that are expected to improve non-interest income include the continued expansion of the wealth management division of our trust department increasing trust fees, expansion of the investment brokerage division increasing commission revenue, and continued increase in sales of commercial and consumer property and casualty insurance policies increasing commission revenue and the potential expansion of Northeast Bank Insurance Agency, Inc. into southern Maine.

Description of Operations

Northeast Bancorp (the "Company") is a Maine corporation and a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston ("FRB") under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. The FRB is the primary regulator of the Company and it supervises and examines our activities on a continual basis. The Company also is a registered Maine financial institution holding company under Maine law and is subject to regulation and examination by the Superintendent of Maine Bureau of Financial Institutions. We conduct business from our headquarters in Lewiston, Maine and, as of September 30, 2006, we had 12 banking offices and eight insurance offices all located in western and south-central Maine. At September 30, 2006, we had consolidated assets of $570.0 million and consolidated stockholders' equity of $40.6 million.

The Company's principal asset is all the capital stock of Northeast Bank (the "Bank"), a Maine state-chartered universal bank. Accordingly, the Company's results of operations are primarily dependent on the results of the operations of the Bank. The Bank's 12 offices are located in Auburn, Augusta, Bethel, Brunswick, Buckfield, Falmouth, Harrison, Lewiston (2), Mechanic Falls, Portland, and South Paris, Maine. The Bank's investment brokerage division offers investment, insurance and financial planning products and services from the office in Falmouth, Maine.

The Bank's wholly owned subsidiary, Northeast Bank Insurance Group Inc, is our insurance agency. In addition to the agency's headquarters in Rangeley, seven insurance agency offices are located in Anson, Auburn, Augusta, Bethel, Jackman, Mexico, and South Paris, Maine. All of our insurance offices offer personal and commercial property and casualty insurance products. See Note 6 in our June 30, 2006 consolidated financial statements for more information.

On September 1, 2006, the Bank purchased the real estate located at 235 Main Street, South Paris, Maine, our South Paris branch, from John Schiavi for a purchase price of $400,000. Mr. Schiavi is a director of Northeast Bancorp. The price was determined through an independent third party appraisal. He was paid $297,000 in cash and 5,000 shares of Northeast Bancorp common stock (based on the $20.60 price on August 31, 2006). Management of Northeast Bancorp and the Bank believe that the transaction reflects arm's-length, negotiated terms.

Page 12

Bank Strategy

The principal business of the Bank consists of attracting deposits from the general public and applying those funds to originate or acquire residential mortgage loans, commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, and a variety of consumer, indirect auto and indirect recreational vehicle loans. The Bank sells from time to time fixed rate residential mortgage loans into the secondary market. The Bank also invests in mortgage-backed securities, securities issued by United States government sponsored enterprises, corporate and municipal securities. The Bank's profitability depends primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income earned from interest-earning assets (i.e. loans and investments) and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities (i.e. customer deposits and borrowed funds). The relative balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the rates paid on these balances affect net interest income. The Bank also emphasizes the growth of non-interest sources of income from investment and insurance brokerage, trust management, and financial planning to reduce its dependency on net interest income.

Our goal is to continue modest, but profitable, growth by increasing our loan and deposit market share in our existing markets in western and south-central Maine, closely managing the yields on earning assets and rates on interest-bearing liabilities, introducing new financial products and services, increasing the number of bank services sold to each household, increasing non-interest income from expanded trust services, investment and insurance brokerage services, and controlling the growth of non-interest expenses. It also is part of our business strategy to make targeted acquisitions in our current market areas from time to time when opportunities present themselves.

Net interest income continues to be our largest source of revenue, and is affected by the level of interest rates, changes in interest rates and by changes in the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The level of the provision for loan losses, non-interest income and expenses of the Company and the Bank, and the effective tax rate also affect profitability. Non-interest income consists primarily of loan and deposit service fees; trust, investment brokerage and insurance brokerage fees; and gains on the sales of loans and investments. Non-interest expenses consist of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy related expenses, deposit insurance premiums paid to the FDIC, and other operating expenses, which include advertising, computer services, supplies, telecommunication, and postage expenses.

Comparison of the Three Months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

The Company reported consolidated net income of $454,667, or $0.18 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared with $1,042,097, or $0.41 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2005, a decrease of $587,430, or 56%. Net interest income decreased $685,833, or 14%, as a result of lower net interest margin and decreased earning assets. Non-interest income decreased $59,460, or 4%, primarily from decreased loan related fees. Non-interest expense increased $210,584, or 5%, primarily due to salaries and employee benefits.

Annualized return on average equity ("ROE") and return on average assets ("ROA") were 4.52% and 0.32%, respectively, for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 10.18% and 0.72%, respectively, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The decrease in the returns on average equity and average assets was primarily due to lower net income for the current quarter.

Page 13

Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased to $4,049,248, as compared to $4,735,081 for the same period in 2005. The decrease in net interest income of $685,833 was primarily due to a 42 basis point decrease in net interest margin and a decrease in average earning assets, down $13,690,987, or 3%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The decrease in average earning assets was primarily due to a decrease in loans of $24,550,887, or 5%, partially offset by an increase in investment securities from the purchase of U.S. government sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed, and municipal securities that increased average investments $13,090,877, or 18%. Average loans as a percentage of average earning assets was 82% and 84%, respectively, for quarters ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. Our net interest margin was 3.01% and 3.43% for the quarters ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Our net interest spread for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was 2.68%, a decrease of 47 basis points from 3.15% for the same period a year ago. Comparing the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the yields on earning assets increased 37 basis points compared to an 84 basis point increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The increases in our yield on earning assets and in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities reflect the general rising interest rate environment. We were not able to increase our net interest spread due to no changes in prime rate during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the volume of repricing of interest-bearing liabilities, and the slightly liability sensitive balance sheet.

The changes in net interest income are presented in the schedule below, which compares the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.

Page 14

The Company's business primarily consists of the commercial banking activities of the Bank. The success of the Company is largely dependent on its ability to manage interest rate risk and, as a result, changes in interest rates, as well as fluctuations in the level of assets and liabilities, affect net interest income. This risk arises from our core banking activities, lending and deposit gathering. In addition to directly impacting net interest income, changes in interest rates can also affect the amount of loans originated and sold by the Bank, the ability of borrowers to repay adjustable or variable rate loans, the average maturity of loans, the rate of amortization of premiums and discounts paid on securities, the amount of unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and the fair value of our saleable assets and the resultant ability to realize gains. The interest sensitivity of the Bank's balance sheet has shifted to a liability sensitive position, where the cost of interest-bearing liabilities reprice more quickly than the yield of interest-bearing assets, from an asset sensitive position. As a result, the Bank is generally expected to experience a decrease in its net interest margins during a period of decreasing interest rates.

As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, 46% and 50%, respectively, of the Bank's loan portfolio was composed of adjustable rate loans based on a prime rate index or short-term rate indices such as the one-year U.S. Treasury bill. Interest income on these existing loans will increase as short-term interest rates increase. An increase in short-term interest rates will also increase deposit and FHLB advance rates, increasing the Company's interest expense. Although the Bank has experienced net interest margin decrease, the impact on future net interest income will depend on, among other things, actual rates charged on the Bank's loan portfolio, deposit and advance rates paid by the Bank and loan volume.

The provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was $300,786, a decrease of $281, or less than 1%, from $300,505 for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The provision was primarily unchanged due to our internal analysis of the allowance for loan loss which was deemed adequate for the risk in the loan portfolio. We considered: the increase in net charge-offs, $190,786 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $68,505 for the same period in 2005; the increased loan delinquency of 2.59% compared to 2.09% at June 30, 2006 due to the amount of loan balances past due; the decrease in non-performing loans (more than 90 days past due); and an increase in internally classified and criticized loans. See Financial Condition for discussion of the Allowance for Loan Losses for the factors impacting the provision for loan losses. The allowance as a percentage of outstanding loans increased to 1.27% at September 30, 2006 compared to 1.26% at June 30, 2006 and 1.16% at September 30, 2005.

Total non-interest income was $1,528,557 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $59,460, or 4%, from $1,588,017 for the three months ended September 30, 2005. This decrease was the combined impact of a $133,268 decrease in loan fees from lower late charges, forbearance fees, and loan placement fees, $28,151 decrease in deposit related fees, and a $4,195 decrease in gains on the sales of loans (residential real estate loans) partially offset by a $14,262 increase in investment brokerage commissions, $24,976 increase in insurance commissions from increased commercial property and casualty policies sold, and a $64,073 increase in other fees primarily from trust services.

Page 15

Non-interest Expense

Total non-interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was $4,669,678, an increase of $210,584, or 5%, from $4,459,094 for the three months ended September 30, 2005. This increase was primarily due a $174,692, or 7%, increase in salaries and employee benefits from an increase in full-time staff for commercial lending, residential real estate secondary market sales, investment brokerage, and our insurance agency, and the related increases in employee benefit expenses. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in accruals for deferred compensation and an increase in deferred loan origination costs. Net occupancy expense increased $18,666, or 5%, due to the capital lease amortization for the new Lewiston Gateway building, higher utilities expense and landscaping for our Auburn, Gateway, and Brunswick sites. Equipment expense increased $6,923 due to depreciation and licensing expense for Internet banking software. Other expense decreased $15,716, or 2%, from lower professional fees, advertising, and deposit expenses partially offset by an other-than-temporary write-down of $72,100 on a non-marketable security. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on the capital lease.

For the three months ended September 30, 2006, the decrease in income tax expense was primarily due to the decrease in income before income taxes as compared to the same periods in 2005.

Our efficiency ratio, total non-interest expense as a percentage of the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, was 84% and 71% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in the efficiency ratio was due, in part, to the decrease in net interest income compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005, and the increase in operating expenses compared to the same period. 

Our consolidated assets were $570,053,365 and $562,917,802 as of September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively, an increase of $7,135,563, or 1%. This was primarily due to an increase of $4,393,608, or 1%, from loans, commercial real estate and consumer loan, and an increase of $2,055,979, or 2%, in investment securities. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, total average assets were $562,437,418, a decrease of $14,333,506, or 2%, from $576,770,924 for the same period in 2005. This average asset decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in net loans.

Total stockholders' equity was $40,603,676 and $39,096,125 at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively, an increase of $1,507,551, or 4%, due to net income for the three months ended September 30, 2006, stock issued in connection with the acquisition of the South Paris branch real estate, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, partially offset by dividends paid. The book value per outstanding share was $16.56 at September 30, 2006 and $15.98 at June 30, 2006.

Our entire investment portfolio is classified as available for sale at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, and is carried at market value. Changes in market value, net of applicable income taxes, are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recognized at the time of the sale using the specific identification method. The amortized cost and market value of available for sale securities at September 30, 2006 were $90,394,207 and $88,193,686, respectively. The difference between the carrying value and the cost of the securities of $2,200,521 was primarily attributable to the decline in market value of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises and mortgage-backed securities below their cost. The net unrealized loss on equity securities was $44,882 and the net unrealized losses on U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, corporate debt, mortgage-backed, and municipal securities were $2,155,639 at September 30, 2006. The U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, corporate debt, and mortgage-backed securities have increased slightly in market value due to the recent decreases in long-term interest rates as compared to June 30, 2006. Substantially all of the U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, corporate debt, mortgage-backed and municipal securities held in our portfolio are high investment grade securities. Management believes that the yields currently received on this portfolio are satisfactory. Management reviews the portfolio of investments on an ongoing basis to determine if there have been any other than temporary declines in value. Some of the considerations management takes into account in making this determination are market valuations of particular securities and economic analysis of the securities' sustainable market values based on the underlying company's profitability. Management plans to hold the equity, U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, corporate debt, mortgage-backed and municipal securities until a recovery of market value occurs or until maturity.

Page 16

Total loans of $440,056,137 as of September 30, 2006 increased $4,393,608, or 1%, from $435,662,529 as of June 30, 2006. Compared to June 30, 2006, commercial real estate, construction, and consumer loans increased, while residential real estate and commercial loans decreased. Commercial real estate loans increased $1,918,239, or 2%, due to an increase in originations. Construction loans increased $2,380,079, or 47%, primarily from one large commercial construction project loan that will be sold into the secondary market upon completion. Consumer loans increased $3,444,151, or 3%, due to increased origination of indirect recreational vehicle and indirect auto loans. Residential real estate loans, which are comprised of purchased loans, residential real estate loans originated for portfolio, and commercial real estate 1 to 4 family loans decreased $762,180, or less than 1%. Commercial loans decreased $2,628,044, or 5% from lower originations. Commercial real estate loans originations increased during the three ended September 30, 2006 due to the creation of new customer relationships with the Bank. Net deferred loan origination costs increased $41,363. The total loan portfolio averaged $436,760,364 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $24,721,147, or 5%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005.

The Bank primarily lends within its local market areas, which management believes helps them to better evaluate credit risk. The Bank's loan portfolio as of September 30, 2006 had slight mix change with increases in commercial real estate, construction and consumer loans that were partially offset by decreases in commercial loans when compared to June 30, 2006. The Bank's local market, as well as the secondary market, continues to be very competitive for loan volume.

Residential real estate loans consisting of primarily owner-occupied residential loans as a percentage of total loans were 34%, 34% and 32% as of September 30, 2006, June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. The variable rate product as a percentage of total residential real estate loans was 41%, 43% and 42% for the same periods, respectively. Generally, management has pursued a strategy of increasing the percentage of variable rate loans as a percentage of the total loan portfolio to help manage interest rate risk. We currently plan to continue to sell all newly originated 30-year fixed-rate residential real estate loans into the secondary market to manage interest rate risk, and hold 15-year fixed rate residential real estate loans in the portfolio. Average residential real estate mortgages of $148,635,272 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased $724,464, or less than 1%, from the three months ended September 30, 2005. This decrease was due to originating more fixed rate loans than are sold. The volume of residential real estate loan originations has decreased slightly, to $5.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $11.3 million for the same period one year ago. This origination volume is expected to increase as general longer-term interest rates decrease. Purchased loans included in our loan portfolio are pools of residential real estate loans acquired from and serviced by other financial institutions. In the past, the Bank has purchased these loan pools as an alternative to mortgage-backed securities. The Bank has not pursued a similar strategy recently.

Commercial real estate loans as a percentage of total loans were 26% as of September 30, 2006, 26% as of June 30, 2006 and 27% as of September 30, 2005. Commercial real estate loans have minimal interest rate risk because the portfolio consists primarily of variable rate products. The variable rate products as a percentage of total commercial real estate loans were 96 %, 96% and 97% for the same periods, respectively. The Bank tries to mitigate credit risk by lending in its market area as well as maintaining a well-collateralized position in real estate. Average commercial real estate loans of $114,270,757 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased $9,382,221, or 8%, from the same period in 2005. This decrease in commercial real estate loans reflects our tightening of credit underwriting standards and competition in existing business markets.

Construction loans as a percentage of total loans were 2%, 2%, and 3% as of September 30, 2006, June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. Limiting disbursements to the percentage of construction completed controls risk. An independent consultant or appraiser verifies the construction progress. Construction loans have maturity dates of less than one year. Variable rate products as a percentage of total construction loans were 48%, 30%, and 71% for the same periods, respectively. Average construction loans were $8,450,014 and $12,684,418 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, a decrease of $4,234,404, or 33%.

Commercial loans as a percentage of total loans were 11%, 12%, and 14% as of September 30, 2006, June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. The variable rate products as a percentage of total commercial loans were 56%, 56%, and 59% for the same periods, respectively. The repayment ability of commercial loan customers is highly dependent on the cash flow of the customer's business. The Bank mitigates losses by strictly adhering to the Company's underwriting and credit policies. Average commercial loans of $47,873,698 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased $18,933,671, or 28%, from $66,807,369 for the same period in 2005.

Page 17

Consumer and other loans as a percentage of total loans were 27%, 26%, and 24% for the periods ended September 30, 2006, June 30, 2006, and September 30, 2005, respectively. At September 30, 2006, indirect auto, indirect recreational vehicle, and indirect mobile home loans represented 34%, 39%, and 23% of total consumer loans, respectively, compared to 35%, 36%, and 25% of total consumer loans at June 30, 2006. Since these loans are primarily fixed rate products, they have interest rate risk when market rates increase. The consumer loan department underwrites all the indirect automobile, recreational vehicle loans and mobile home loans to mitigate credit risk. The Bank typically pays a one-time origination fee to dealers of indirect loans. The fees are deferred and amortized over the life of the loans as a yield adjustment. Management attempts to mitigate credit and interest rate risk by keeping the products with average lives of no longer than five years, receiving a rate of return commensurate with the risk, and lending to individuals in the Bank's market areas. Average consumer and other loans were $114,832,839 and $106,389,816 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The $8,443,023, or 8%, increase was due to increased indirect recreational vehicle lending. The composition of consumer loans is detailed in the following table.

Loans are classified as non-performing when reaching more than 90 days delinquent, or when less than 90 days past due and based on our judgment the loan is likely to present future principal and/or interest repayments problems. In both situations, we stop accruing interest. The Bank had non-performing loans totaling $5,086,000 and $5,195,000 at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively, or 1.16% and 1.19% of total loans, respectively. The Bank's allowance for loan losses was equal to 110% and 106% of the total non-performing loans at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively. The following table represents the Bank's non-performing loans as of September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively:

Non-performing loans decreased in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 for the first quarter end since June 30, 2005. Of total non-performing loans at September 30, 2006, $2,653,000 of these loans were current and paying as agreed compared to $1,882,000 at June 30, 2006. Non-performing loans, compared to June 30, 2006, decreased in all portfolios except consumer and other loans which increased $118,000. The commercial real estate and commercial non-performing loans are subject to a name-by-name review determining the risk of loss based on the liquidation of collateral. This risk of loss is incorporated in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

At September 30, 2006, the Bank had $3,121,000 in loans classified special mention or substandard that management believes could potentially become non-performing due to delinquencies or marginal cash flows. These special mention and substandard loans decreased by $228,000 when compared to the $3,349,000 at June 30, 2006.

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate, under present conditions, for the credit risk in the balance of the increase in commercial real estate and the increases in commercial construction, commercial, and consumer and other loans.

The following table reflects the quarterly trend of total delinquencies 30 days or more past due and non-performing loans for the Bank as a percentage of total loans:

The Bank maintains the loans as non-performing until the borrower has demonstrated a sustainable period of performance. Excluding these loans, the Bank's total delinquencies 30 days or more past due, as a percentage of total loans, would be 1.95% as of September 30, 2006. We restated the delinquency percentages in the above table for the quarters ended prior to March 31, 2006 because we changed the measurement of past due loans to the actual number of days lapsed from the last payment from the number of payments past due. For the period ended December 31, 2005, we previously reported delinquencies and non-performing loans of 2.28%.

Page 18

The Bank's allowance for loan losses was $5,606,000 as of September 30, 2006 as compared to $5,496,000 as of June 30, 2006, representing 1.27% and 1.26% of total loans for each of the periods. Management maintains an allowance at a level that it believes is reasonable for the overall risk inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses represents management's estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The frequency of default, risk ratings, and the loss recovery rates, among other things, are considered in making this evaluation, as are the size and diversity of individual large credits. Changes in these estimates could have a direct impact on the provision and could result in a change in the allowance. The larger the provision for loan loss, the greater the negative impact on our net income. Larger balance, commercial and commercial real estate loans representing significant individual credit exposures are evaluated based upon the borrower's overall financial condition, resources, and payment record; the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors; and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. The allowance for loan losses attributed to these loans is established through a process that includes estimates of historical and projected default rates and loss severities; internal risk ratings; and geographic, industry, and other environmental factors. Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including trends in internally risk-rated loans, classified loans, non accrual loans, and historical and forecasted write-offs; and a review of industry, geographic, and portfolio concentrations, including current developments. In addition, management considers the current business strategy and credit process, including credit limit setting and compliance, credit approvals, loan underwriting criteria, and loan workout procedures. Within the allowance for loan losses, amounts are specified for larger-balance, commercial and commercial real estate loans that have been individually determined to be impaired. These specific reserves consider all available evidence, including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's contractual effective rate and the fair value of collateral. Each portfolio of smaller balance, residential real estate and consumer loans, is collectively evaluated for impairment. The allowance for loan losses is established via a process that includes historical delinquency and credit loss experience, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions. Management also considers overall portfolio indicators including historical credit losses; delinquent, non-performing and classified loans; trends in volumes; terms of loans; an evaluation of overall credit quality and the credit process, including lending policies and procedures; and economic factors. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, we have not changed our approach in the determination of the allowance for loan losses. There have been no material changes in the assumptions or estimation techniques as compared to prior periods in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2006 was adequate considering the level of risk in the loan portfolio. While management believes that it uses the best information available to make its determinations with respect to the allowance, there can be no assurance that the Company will not have to increase its provision for loan losses in the future as a result of changing economic conditions, adverse markets for real estate or other factors. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank's allowance for loan losses. These agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. The Bank's most recent joint examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and the Maine Bureau of Financial Institutions was completed in November 2005. At the time of the examination the regulators proposed no adjustments to the allowance for loan losses.

Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) is invested in the general account of two insurance companies and in separate accounts of a third insurance company. Standard and Poor's rated these companies AA or better at September 30, 2006. Interest earnings, net of mortality costs, increase cash surrender value. These interest earnings are based on interest rates reset at least annually, subject to minimum interest rates. These increases were recognized in other income and are not subject to income taxes. Borrowing on or surrendering the policy may subject the Bank to income tax expense on the increase in cash surrender value. For this reason, management considers BOLI an illiquid asset. BOLI represented 19.4% of Company's capital plus the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2006, which is below the 25% regulatory limit.

Intangible assets of $1,852,903 as of September 30, 2006 decreased $66,762, from $1,919,665 as of June 30, 2006. This asset consists of customer list and non-compete agreement intangibles from insurance agency acquisitions. See Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2006 for additional information on intangible assets.

Page 19

The Bank continues to attract new local core and certificates of deposit relationships. As alternative sources of funds, the Bank utilizes FHLB advances and brokered time deposits ("brokered deposits") when their respective interest rates are less than the interest rates on local market deposits. FHLB advances are used to fund short-term liquidity demands and supplement the growth in earning assets.

Total deposits of $390,286,927 as of September 30, 2006 decreased $5,006,450, or 1%, from $395,293,377 as of June 30, 2006. Excluding the decrease in brokered deposits, customer deposits increased $1,473,217, or less than 1%. Certificates of deposits increased $442,526, or less than 1%, reflecting the competitive pressure on certificates. Brokered deposits decreased $6,479,667, or 12%, from the repayment of maturing balances reducing our dependence on wholesale funding. NOW accounts increased $4,425,122, or 8%, primarily from one new deposit relationship. All other types of the deposits decreased; demand deposit accounts decreased $2,655,330, money market accounts decreased $73,779, and savings accounts decreased $665,322 during the three months ended September 30, 2006. Management's continuing strategy offers certificate of deposit rates for maturities two years and less near the top of the market to attract new deposit account relationships.

Total average deposits of $388,938,221 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased $8,713,923, or 2%, compared to the average for the three months ended September 30, 2005. This decrease in total average deposits compared to September 30, 2005 was attributable to a decrease in average demand deposits of $6,247,225, or 15%, a decrease in NOW accounts of $5,516,328, or 9%, a decrease in money markets of $5,984,658, or 39%, a decrease in savings of $5,406,051, or 18%, and a $17,970,273 or 27%, decrease in brokered time deposits. These decreases were partially offset by a $32,410,612, or 18%, increase in certificate of deposits. These decreases in core account balances reflect customers moving funds to higher yielding certificates of deposit. Excluding average brokered deposits, average customer deposits increased $9,256,350, or 3%, for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period one year ago. At September 30, 2006, brokered time deposits as a percentage of total assets was 8.0% compared to 9.2% at June 30, 2006 and 10.5% at September 30, 2005. The weighted average maturity for the brokered deposits was approximately 0.6 years. Even though deposit interest rates have remained competitive, the rates of return are potentially higher with other financial instruments such as mutual funds and annuities. All interest-bearing non-maturing deposit accounts have market interest rates. Like other companies in the banking industry, the Bank will be challenged to maintain or increase its core deposits, and improve its net interest margin as the mix of deposits shifts to certificates of deposit.

Brokered deposits are used by us as part of our overall funding strategy and as an alternative to customer certificates of deposits, FHLB advances, and junior subordinated debentures to fund the growth of our earning assets. Policy limits the use of brokered deposits to 25% of total assets. We use five national brokerage firms to source brokered deposits. Each brokerage company utilizes a system of agents who solicit customers throughout the United States. The terms of these deposits allow for withdrawal prior to maturity only in the case of the depositor's death, have maturities generally beyond one year, have maturities no greater than $5 million in any one month, and bear interest rates equal to or slightly above comparable FHLB advance rates. Brokered deposits carry the same risk as local certificates of deposit, in that both are interest rate sensitive with respect to the Bank's ability to retain the funds. The Bank expects a slight increase in the level of brokered deposits to fund its balance sheet growth for the next twelve months.

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) were $77,682,864 as of September 30, 2006, an increase of $1,794,266, or 2%, from $75,888,598 as of June 30, 2006. At September 30, 2006, we had pledged U.S. government agency and mortgage-backed securities of $37,736,419 as collateral for FHLB advances. We plan to continue to purchase additional U.S. government agency and mortgage-backed securities to pledge as collateral for advances. These purchases will be funded from the cash flow from mortgage-backed securities and residential real estate loans principal and interest payments, and promotion of deposit accounts including certificates of deposit and brokered deposits. Newly originated adjustable residential real estate loans will be held in portfolio and will qualify as collateral. In addition to U.S. government agency and mortgage-backed securities, residential real estate loans, certain commercial real estate loans, and certain FHLB deposits free of liens, pledges and encumbrances are required to be pledged to secure FHLB advances. Municipal securities cannot be pledged. Average advances from the FHLB were $79,010,284 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $6,850,953, or 8%, compared to $85,861,237 average for the same period last year.

Securities sold under repurchase agreements were $38,938,458 as of September 30, 2006, an increase of $9,301,032, or 31%, from $29,637,426 as of June 30, 2006. Market interest rates are offered on this product. At September 30, 2006, we had pledged U.S. government agency and mortgage-backed securities of $32,370,112 as collateral for repurchase agreements. Average securities sold under repurchase agreements were $31,108,930 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a slight increase of $36,782, or less than 1%, compared to the average for the three months ended September 30, 2005.

The Bank has a line of credit under the Borrower-in-Custody program offered through the Fed Discount Window. Under the terms of this credit line, the Bank has pledged its indirect auto loans and the line bears a variable interest rate equal to the then current federal funds rate plus 1.00%. At September 30, 2006, there were no borrowings outstanding under this credit line.

The following table is a summary of the liquidity the Bank has the ability to access as of September 30, 2006 in addition to the traditional retail deposit products:

Brokered time deposits, retail deposits and FHLB advances are used by the Bank to manage its overall liquidity position. While we closely monitor and forecast our liquidity position, it is affected by asset growth, deposit withdrawals and meeting other contractual obligations and commitments. The accuracy of our forecast assumptions may increase or decrease the level of brokered time deposits.

Management believes that there are adequate funding sources to meet its liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. Primary among these funding sources are the repayment of principal and interest on loans, the renewal of time deposits, the potential growth in the deposit base, and the credit availability from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston and the Fed Discount Window Borrower-in-Custody program. Management does not believe that the terms and conditions that will be present at the renewal of these funding sources will significantly impact the Company's operations, due to its management of the maturities of its assets and liabilities.

The following table summarizes the outstanding junior subordinated notes as of September 30, 2006:

The excess funds raised from the issuance of trust preferred securities are available for capital contributions to the Bank. The annual interest expense is approximately $1,059,971 based on the current interest rates.

See Note 2 for more information on NBN Capital Trusts II, III and IV and the related junior subordinated debt.

Page 20

The 2004 Stock Repurchase Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on January 16, 2004. It was extended by the Board of Directors on December 16, 2005 and will terminate on December 31, 2006. The repurchase program may be discontinued by the Northeast Bancorp at any time. Under the 2004 Stock Repurchase Plan, the Company may purchase up to 200,000 shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market at prevailing prices. Common stock repurchased pursuant to the plan will be classified as authorized but un-issued shares of common stock available for future issuance as determined by the Board of Directors, from time to time. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, the Company repurchased no shares of stock. Total stock repurchases under the 2005 Plan were 145,500 shares for $3,204,092 through September 30, 2006. The number of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2004 Stock Repurchase Plan is 54,500 shares. Management believes that these and future purchases have not and will not have a significant effect on the Company's liquidity.

Total stockholders' equity of the Company was $40,603,676 as of September 30, 2006, as compared to $39,096,125 at June 30, 2006. The increase of $1,507,551, or 1%, was due to the net income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 of $454,667, stock issued in connection with the acquisition of the South Paris branch real estate of $103,000, and an increase in other comprehensive income of $1,170,126 partially offset by dividends paid of $220,242. Book value per common share was $16.56 as of September 30, 2006, as compared to $15.98 at June 30, 2006. The total average equity to total average assets ratio of the Company was 7.10% as of September 30, 2006 and 7.01% at June 30, 2006.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA"), contains various provisions intended to capitalize the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF") and also affects a number of regulatory reforms that impact all insured depository institutions, regardless of the insurance fund in which they participate. Among other things, FDICIA grants the FRB broader regulatory authority to take prompt corrective action against insured institutions that do not meet capital requirements, including placing undercapitalized institutions into conservatorship or receivership. FDICIA also grants the FRB broader regulatory authority to take corrective action against insured institutions that are otherwise operating in an unsafe and unsound manner.

FDICIA defines specific capital categories based on an institution's capital ratios. Regulations require a minimum Tier 1 capital equal to 4.0% of adjusted total average assets, Tier 1 risk-based capital of 4.0% and a total risk-based capital standard of 8.0%. The prompt corrective action regulations define specific capital categories based on an institution's capital ratios. The capital categories, in declining order are "well capitalized", "adequately capitalized", "under capitalized", "significantly undercapitalized", and "critically undercapitalized". As of September 30, 2006, the most recent notification from the FRB categorized the Bank as well capitalized. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes has changed the institution's category.

At September 30, 2006, the Company's and Bank's regulatory capital was in compliance with regulatory capital requirements as follows:

Page 21

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, unused lines of credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of the Company's involvement in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, unused lines of credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. To control the credit risk associated with entering into commitments and issuing letters of credit, the Company uses the same credit quality, collateral policies, and monitoring controls in making commitments and letters of credit as it does with its lending activities. The Company evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total committed amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the counter party.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers.

Unused lines of credit and commitments to extend credit typically result in loans with a market interest rate.

 A summary of the amounts of the Company's (a) contractual obligations, and (b) other commitments with off-balance sheet risk, both at September 30, 2006, follows:

Management believes that the Company has adequate resources to fund all of its commitments.

The Bank has written options limited to those residential real estate loans designated for sale in the secondary market and subject to a rate lock. These rate-locked loan commitments are used for trading activities, not as a hedge. The fair value of the outstanding written options at September 30, 2006 was a gain of $13,011.

The consolidated financial statements and related notes herein have been presented in terms of historic dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike industrial companies, substantially all of the assets and virtually all of the liabilities of the Company are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on the Company's performance than the general level of inflation. Over short periods of time, interest rates may not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as inflation.

Page 22

There have been no material changes in the Company's market risk from June 30, 2006. For information regarding the Company's market risk, refer to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding timely disclosure. In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost/benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Our management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q.

Based on this evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2006.

There were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a - 15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the first three months of our 2007 fiscal year that has materially affected, or in other factors that could affect, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.

Page 23

Part II - Other Information

Page 24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Page 25

NORTHEAST BANCORP
Index to Exhibits