Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2007

Navigation Links          Click here to quickly move through the content of the Form 10-Q filing.


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

___________________________

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007

OR

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 1-13578

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

33-0633413
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3501 Jamboree Road, Newport Beach, CA
(Address of principal executive office)

92660
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

(949) 854-0300

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X    No     

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated file     X     Accelerated filer          Non-accelerated filer      

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes      No    X  

          At March 31, 2007, 27,853,783 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value were outstanding.


Page
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP.

March 31, 2007 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. –

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS           

1

Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2007 and 2006 and December 31, 2006          

1

Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended

March 31, 2007 and 2006          

2

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended

March 31, 2007 and 2006          

3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended

March 31, 2007 and 2006          

4

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements           

6

ITEM 2. –

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS           

17

ITEM 3. –

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK           

49

ITEM 4. –

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES           

49

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. –

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS           

50

ITEM 1A. –

RISK FACTORS           

50

ITEM 2. –

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS           

50

ITEM 3. –

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES           

50

ITEM 4. –

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIY HOLDERS           

50

ITEM 5. –

OTHER INFORMATION           

50

ITEM 6. –

EXHIBITS           

51

AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS           

51

SIGNATURES           

51


Page i
Navigation Links

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

March 31,

December 31,

March 31,

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

2007

2006

2006


Assets

Cash

$

157,084

$

124,865

$

168,822

Federal funds

-

1

-


Cash and cash equivalents

157,084

124,866

168,822

U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities and other investment

securities available for sale, at fair value

1,411,258

1,433,176

730,402

Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value

267,862

363,215

561,511

Mortgage-backed securities available for sale, at fair value

117

251

271

Loans held for investment

13,002,795

13,868,227

15,912,318

Allowance for loan losses

(60,758

)

(60,943

)

(44,504

)


Loans held for investment, net

12,942,037

13,807,284

15,867,814

Investments in real estate and joint ventures

61,663

59,843

49,182

Real estate acquired in settlement of loans

17,212

8,524

385

Premises and equipment

115,534

114,052

110,595

Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost

126,125

152,953

182,557

Mortgage servicing rights, net

20,689

21,196

20,165

Other assets

118,288

122,022

111,055


$

15,237,869

$

16,207,382

$

17,802,759


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Deposits

$

11,647,431

$

11,784,869

$

12,198,903

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

546,870

469,971

-

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

1,298,197

2,140,785

3,825,811

Senior notes

198,305

198,260

198,129

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

93,977

220,262

317,976

Deferred income taxes

13,626

-

17,301


Total liabilities

13,798,406

14,814,147

16,558,120


Stockholders’ equity

Preferred stock, par value of $0.01 per share; authorized 5,000,000 shares;

outstanding none

-

-

-

Common stock, par value of $0.01 per share; authorized 50,000,000 shares;

issued 28,235,022 shares at March 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and

March 31, 2006; outstanding 27,853,783 shares at March 31, 2007,

December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006

282

282

282

Additional paid-in capital

93,792

93,792

93,792

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(1,676

)

(5,204

)

(6,196

)

Retained earnings

1,363,857

1,321,157

1,173,553

Treasury stock, at cost, 381,239 shares at March 31, 2007,

December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006

(16,792

)

(16,792

)

(16,792

)


Total stockholders’ equity

1,439,463

1,393,235

1,244,639


$

15,237,869

$

16,207,382

$

17,802,759


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 1
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income

Three Months Ended

March 31,


(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

2007

2006


Interest income

Loans

$

252,172

$

255,345

U.S. Treasury and government sponsored entities securities

19,174

7,336

Mortgage-backed securities

3

3

Other investment securities

2,471

2,279


Total interest income

273,820

264,963


Interest expense

Deposits

113,575

91,835

Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

31,830

43,914

Senior notes

3,301

3,298


Total interest expense

148,706

139,047


Net interest income

125,114

125,916

Provision for credit losses

617

10,057


Net interest income after provision for credit losses

124,497

115,859


Other income, net

Loan and deposit related fees

8,836

8,558

Real estate and joint ventures held for investment, net

476

2,289

Secondary marketing activities:

Loan servicing income (loss), net

(436

)

189

Net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities

8,740

11,654

Other

72

520


Total other income, net

17,688

23,210


Operating expense

Salaries and related costs

42,234

40,780

Premises and equipment costs

8,809

8,538

Advertising expense

1,191

1,242

Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments

2,764

1,014

Professional fees

559

792

Other general and administrative expense

9,795

9,175


Total general and administrative expense

65,352

61,541

Net operation of real estate acquired in settlement of loans

291

(9

)


Total operating expense

65,643

61,532


Income before income taxes

76,542

77,537

Income taxes

33,679

33,840


Net income

$

42,863

$

43,697


Per share information

Basic

$

1.54

$

1.57

Diluted

$

1.54

$

1.57

Cash dividends declared and paid

$

0.12

$

0.10

Weighted average shares outstanding

Basic

27,853,783

27,853,783

Diluted

27,884,030

27,883,221


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 2
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Three Months Ended

March 31,


(In Thousands)

2007

2006


Net income

$

42,863

$

43,697


Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes (benefits)

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities and other investment

securities available for sale, at fair value

3,587

(1,367

)

Mortgage-backed securities available for sale, at fair value

1

-

Reclassification of realized amounts included in net income

-

-

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:

Net derivative instruments

154

503

Reclassification of realized amounts included in net income

(214

)

76


Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes (benefits)

3,528

(788

)


Comprehensive income

$

46,391

$

42,909


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 3
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Three Months Ended

March 31,


(In Thousands)

2007

2006


Cash flows from operating activities

Net income

$

42,863

$

43,697

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used for operating activities:

Depreciation

3,475

3,285

Amortization

30,523

26,076

Provision for losses on loans, loan-related commitments, investments in

real estate and joint ventures, mortgage servicing rights,

real estate acquired in settlement of loans, and other assets

692

10,018

Net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities, mortgage servicing rights,

investment securities, real estate and other assets

(8,921

)

(12,618

)

Interest capitalized on loans (negative amortization)

(77,796

)

(64,827

)

Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends

(2,413

)

(2,274

)

Loans originated and purchased for sale

(640,669

)

(980,164

)

Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale, including those sold

as mortgage-backed securities

721,268

887,037

Other, net

(113,184

)

(17,817

)


Net cash used by operating activities

(44,162

)

(107,587

)


Cash flows from investing activities

Proceeds from:

Sales of Federal Home Loan Bank stock

29,241

-

Maturities or calls of U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities

and other investment securities available for sale

128,150

4,750

Sales of wholly owned real estate and real estate acquired in settlement of loans

2,871

681

Purchase of:

U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities and other investment securities

available for sale

(100,000

)

(61,225

)

Loans held for investment

-

(12,218

)

Premises and equipment

(5,455

)

(9,902

)

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

-

(439

)

Originations of loans held for investment (net of refinances of $229,941 for the

three months ended March 31, 2007 and $199,203 for the three months ended

March 31, 2006)

(390,457

)

(1,621,617

)

Principal payments on loans held for investment and mortgage-backed securities

available for sale

1,330,381

1,194,760

Net change in undisbursed loan funds

(12,537

)

(2,881

)

Other, net

610

6,496


Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities

982,804

(501,595

)


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 4
Navigation Links

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

Three Months Ended

March 31,


(In Thousands)

2007

2006


Cash flows from financing activities

Net increase (decrease) in deposits

$

(137,438

)

$

322,055

Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

5,276,899

7,148,170

Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

(6,045,000

)

(6,877,100

)

Cash dividends

(3,342

)

(2,785

)

Other, net

2,457

(2,732

)


Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

(906,424

)

587,608


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

32,218

(21,574

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

124,866

190,396


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

157,084

$

168,822


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest

$

154,771

$

151,688

Income taxes

119,608

393

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing:

Loans transferred to held for investment from held for sale

17,545

4,006

Loans transferred from held for investment to held for sale

1,311

166

U.S. Treasury, government sponsored entities and other investment securities

available for sale, purchased and not settled

-

49,996

Loans exchanged for mortgage-backed securities

283,691

213,980

Real estate acquired in settlement of loans

11,881

104


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 5
Navigation Links

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE (1) – Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

          In the opinion of Downey Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (“Downey,” “we,” “us” and “our”), the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q) necessary for a fair presentation of Downey’s financial condition as of March 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006, the results of operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and changes in cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, Downey discovered that it had under reported income taxes for 2004 through 2006 by immaterial amounts. However, since the correction of our income taxes would be material to the current quarter, Downey has adjusted its previously reported results in the accompanying financial statements. For a discussion and summary of the impact of the amounts related to Downey’s adjustment of prior period data see Note (4) – Income Taxes on page 12 and Note (9) – Adjustment of Prior and Beginning Period Amounts on page 15.

          The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements and are in compliance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial condition, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows. The information under the heading Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presumes that the interim consolidated financial statements will be read in conjunction with Downey’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which contains among other things, a description of the business, the latest audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of December 31, 2006 and for the year then ended. Therefore, only material changes in financial condition and results of operations are discussed in the remainder of Part I.

Page 6
Navigation Links

NOTE (2) – Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”)

          The following table summarizes the activity in MSRs and its related allowance for the periods indicated and other related financial data.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Gross balance at beginning of period

$

21,435

$

20,483

$

20,665

$

20,420

$

21,157

Additions (a)

1,341

2,122

896

1,285

1,022

Amortization

(1,024

)

(1,087

)

(1,056

)

(1,029

)

(1,198

)

Sales

(868

)

-

-

-

-

Impairment write-down

(13

)

(83

)

(22

)

(11

)

(561

)


Gross balance at end of period

20,871

21,435

20,483

20,665

20,420


Allowance balance at beginning of period

239

173

104

255

855

Provision for (reduction of) impairment

(44

)

149

91

(140

)

(39

)

Impairment write-down

(13

)

(83

)

(22

)

(11

)

(561

)


Allowance balance at end of period

182

239

173

104

255


Total mortgage servicing rights, net

$

20,689

$

21,196

$

20,310

$

20,561

$

20,165


As a percentage of associated mortgage loans

0.88

%

0.89

%

0.87

%

0.87

%

0.85

%

Estimated fair value (b)

$

22,461

$

22,828

$

22,383

$

23,644

$

21,894

Weighted average expected life (in months)

56

54

51

56

51

Custodial account earnings rate

5.26

%

5.28

%

5.28

%

5.39

%

4.90

%

Weighted average discount rate

10.27

10.28

9.41

9.39

9.45


At period end

Mortgage loans serviced for others:

Total

$

6,021,673

$

5,908,233

$

6,595,462

$

6,377,737

$

5,794,067

With capitalized mortgage servicing rights:(b)

Amount

2,348,060

2,394,754

2,345,880

2,369,543

2,372,534

Weighted average interest rate

5.77

%

5.75

%

5.70

%

5.66

%

5.63

%

Total loans sub-serviced without mortgage

servicing rights: (c)

Term – less than six months

$

125,425

$

93,074

$

981,883

$

228,455

$

153,655

Term – indefinite

3,533,200

3,404,342

3,249,905

3,760,642

3,248,012


Custodial account balances

$

176,171

$

172,462

$

171,481

$

147,831

$

124,324


(a) Included minor amounts repurchased.
(b) The estimated fair value may exceed book value for certain asset strata and excluded loans sold or securitized prior to 1996 and loans sub-serviced without capitalized MSRs.
(c) Servicing is performed for a fixed fee per loan each month.

          Downey capitalizes MSRs at fair value for residential one-to-four unit mortgage loans we originate and sell with servicing rights retained and at the lower of cost or fair value for MSRs acquired through purchase. Downey discloses MSRs associated with the origination and sale of loans in the financial statements as a component of the net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities. MSRs are amortized over the estimated servicing period as a component of loan servicing income (loss), net. Downey recognizes impairment losses on the MSRs through a valuation allowance and records any associated provision as a component of loan servicing income (loss), net category.

           Downey’s loan servicing portfolio normally increases in value as interest rates rise and loan prepayments decrease and declines in value as interest rates fall and loan prepayments increase. Key assumptions used to determine the fair value of MSRs, which vary due to changes in market interest rates, include: expected prepayment speeds, which impact the average life of the portfolio; the earnings rate on custodial accounts, which impacts the value of custodial accounts; and the discount rate used in valuing future cash flows. Impairment is measured on a disaggregated basis based upon the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying mortgage loans, which include loans by loan term and coupon rate (stratified in 50 basis point increments). Impairment losses are recognized through a valuation allowance for each impaired stratum. Certain stratum may have impairment, while other stratum may not. Therefore, changes in overall fair value may not equal provisions for or reductions of the valuation allowance. Once a quarter, Downey conducts model validation procedures by obtaining three independent broker results for the fair value of MSRs and comparing them to the results of its MSR model.

Page 7
Navigation Links

          The following table summarizes the estimated changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights for changes in those assumptions individually and in combination associated with an immediate 100 basis point increase or decrease in market rates. The table also summarizes the earnings impact associated with provisions for or reductions of the valuation allowance for mortgage servicing rights. The sensitivity analysis in the table below is hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 100 basis point variation in assumptions generally cannot be easily extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may have on the fair value is calculated without changing any other assumptions. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Expected

Custodial

Prepayment

Accounts

Discount

(Dollars in Thousands)

Speeds

Rate

Rate

Combination


Increase rates 100 basis points: (a)

Increase (decrease) in fair value

$

2,207

$

1,120

$

(805

)

$

2,446

Reduction of (increase in) valuation allowance

98

64

(102

)

117

Decrease rates 100 basis points: (b)

Increase (decrease) in fair value

(5,844

)

(1,143

)

832

(6,833

)

Reduction of (increase in) valuation allowance

(5,024

)

(224

)

40

(5,704

)


(a) The weighted-average expected life of the MSRs portfolio becomes 67 months.
(b) The weighted-average expected life of the MSRs portfolio becomes 32 months.

          The following table presents a breakdown of the components of loan servicing income (loss), net included in Downey’s results of operations for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Net cash servicing fees

$

1,607

$

1,647

$

1,583

$

1,574

$

1,566

Payoff and curtailment interest cost (a)

(1,063

)

(1,269

)

(813

)

(233

)

(218

)

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights

(1,024

)

(1,087

)

(1,056

)

(1,029

)

(1,198

)

(Provision for) reduction of impairment of

mortgage servicing rights

44

(149

)

(91

)

140

39


Total loan servicing income (loss), net

$

(436

)

$

(858

)

$

(377

)

$

452

$

189


(a) Represents the difference between the contractual obligation to pay interest to the investor for an entire month and the actual interest received when a loan prepays prior to the end of the month. However, loan servicing activities do not include the benefit of the use of total loan repayments to increase net interest income.

NOTE (3) – Derivatives, Hedging Activities, Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Other Contractual Obligations (Risk Management)

Derivatives

          Downey offers short-term interest rate lock commitments to help attract potential home loan borrowers. The commitments guarantee a specified interest rate for a loan if underwriting standards are met, but do not obligate the potential borrower. Accordingly, some commitments never become loans and merely expire. The residential one-to-four unit interest rate lock commitments Downey ultimately expects to result in loans and sell in the secondary market are treated as derivatives. Consequently, as derivatives, the hedging of the interest rate lock commitments does not qualify for hedge accounting. Associated fair value adjustments to the notional amount of interest rate lock commitments are recorded in current earnings under net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities with an offset to the balance sheet in either other assets, or accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Fair values for the notional amount of interest rate lock commitments are based on dealer quoted market prices acquired from third parties. The carrying amount of loans held for sale includes a basis adjustment to the loan balance at funding resulting from the change in fair value of the interest rate lock derivative from the date of rate lock to the date of funding. At March 31, 2007, Downey had a notional amount of interest rate lock commitments identified to sell as part of its secondary marketing activities of $225 million, with a change in fair value resulting in a recorded loss of $0.8 million.

          Downey does not generally enter into derivative transactions for purely speculative purposes.

Page 8
Navigation Links

Derivative Hedging Activities

          As part of its secondary marketing activities, Downey typically utilizes short-term loan forward sale and purchase contracts—derivatives—that mature in less than one year to offset the impact of changes in market interest rates on the value of residential one-to-four unit interest rate lock commitments and loans held for sale. In general, interest rate lock commitments associated with fixed rate loans require a higher percentage of loan forward sale contracts to mitigate interest rate risk than those associated with adjustable rate loans. Contracts designated as hedges for the forecasted sale of loans from the held for sale portfolio are accounted for as cash flow hedges because these contracts have a high correlation to the price movement of the loans being hedged (within a range of 80% - 125%). The measurement approach for determining the ineffective aspects of the hedge is established at the inception of the hedge. Changes in fair value of the notional amount of loan forward sale contracts not designated as cash flow hedges and the ineffectiveness of hedge transactions that are not perfectly correlated are recorded in net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities. Changes in expected future cash flows related to the fair value of the notional amount of loan forward sale contracts designated as cash flow hedges for the forecasted sale of loans held for sale are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, provided cash flow hedge requirements are met. The offset to these changes are recorded in the balance sheet as either other assets, or accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will be recognized in the income statement when the hedged forecasted transactions impact earnings. Downey estimates that all of the related unrealized gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings within the next three months. Fair values for the notional amount of loan forward sale contracts are based on dealer quoted market prices acquired from third parties. At March 31, 2007, the notional amount of loan forward sale contracts amounted to $464 million, with a change in fair value resulting in a gain of $1.3 million, of which $254 million were designated as cash flow hedges. There were no loan forward purchase contracts at March 31, 2007.

          Downey has not discontinued any designated derivative instruments associated with loans held for sale due to a change in the probability of settling a forecasted transaction.

          In connection with its interest rate risk management, Downey from time-to-time enters into interest rate exchange agreements (“swap contracts”) with certain national investment banking firms or the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) under terms that provide mutual payment of interest on the outstanding notional amount of swap contracts. These swap contracts help Downey manage the effects of adverse changes in interest rates on net interest income. Downey has interest rate swap contracts on which it pays variable interest based on the 3-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) while receiving fixed interest. The swaps were designated as a hedge of changes in the fair value of certain FHLB fixed rate advances due to changes in market interest rates. The payment and maturity dates of the swap contracts match those of the advances. This hedge effectively converts fixed interest rate advances into debt that adjusts quarterly to movements in 3-month LIBOR. Because the terms of the swap contracts match those of the advances, the hedge has no ineffectiveness and results are reported in interest expense. The fair value of interest rate swap contracts is based on dealer quoted market prices acquired from third parties and represents the estimated amount Downey would receive or pay upon terminating the contracts, taking into consideration current interest rates and the remaining contract terms. The fair value of the swap contracts is recorded on the balance sheet in either other assets or accounts payable and accrued liabilities. With no ineffectiveness, the recorded swap contract values will essentially act as fair value adjustments to the advances being hedged. At March 31, 2007, swap contracts with a notional amount totaling $430 million were outstanding and had a fair value loss of $12 million recorded on the balance sheet in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and as a decrease to the advances being hedged.

          The following table summarizes Downey’s interest rate swap contracts at March 31, 2007.

Weighted

Notional

Average

(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Interest Rate

Term


Pay – Variable (3-month LIBOR)

$

(100,000

)

5.36

%

March 2004 – October 2008

Receive – Fixed

100,000

3.20

Pay – Variable (3-month LIBOR)

(130,000

)

5.36

March 2004 – October 2008

Receive – Fixed

130,000

3.21

Pay – Variable (3-month LIBOR)

(100,000

)

5.36

March 2004 – November 2008

Receive – Fixed

100,000

3.26

Pay – Variable (3-month LIBOR)

(100,000

)

5.36

March 2004 – November 2008

Receive – Fixed

100,000

3.27


Page 9
Navigation Links

          The following table shows the impact from non-qualifying hedges and the ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges on net gains (losses) on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities (i.e., SFAS 133 effect), as well as the impact to other comprehensive income (loss) from qualifying cash flow transactions for the periods indicated. Also shown is the notional amount or balance for Downey’s non-qualifying and qualifying hedge transactions.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Net gains (losses) on non-qualifying hedge transactions

$

251

$

(309

)

$

(304

)

$

(733

)

$

238

Net gains on qualifying cash flow hedge transactions:

Unrealized hedge ineffectiveness

-

-

-

-

-

Less reclassification of realized hedge ineffectiveness

-

-

-

-

-


Total net gains (losses) recognized in sales of loans and

mortgage-backed securities (SFAS 133 effect)

251

(309

)

(304

)

(733

)

238

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(60

)

434

(201

)

(385

)

579


Notional amount or balance at period end

Non-qualifying hedge transactions:

Interest rate lock commitments (a)

$

224,546

$

196,751

$

236,435

$

237,867

$

307,635

Associated loan forward sale contracts

209,818

187,804

213,783

209,815

261,359

Qualifying cash flow hedge transactions:

Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value

267,862

363,215

323,428

417,691

561,511

Associated loan forward sale contracts

254,260

341,696

307,982

398,741

544,141

Qualifying fair value hedge transactions:

Designated FHLB advances – pay-fixed

430,000

430,000

430,000

430,000

430,000

Associated interest rate swap contracts –

pay-variable, receive-fixed

430,000

430,000

430,000

430,000

430,000


(a) Amount represents the notional amount of the commitments or contracts reduced by an anticipated fallout factor for those commitments not expected to fund. The notional amount for interest rate lock commitments before the reduction of expected fallout was $290 million.

          These loan forward sale and swap contracts expose Downey to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the other parties—primarily government-sponsored enterprises such as Federal National Mortgage Association, securities firms and the FHLB. This risk consists primarily of the termination value of agreements where Downey is in an unfavorable position. Downey controls the credit risk associated with its other parties to the various derivative agreements through credit review, exposure limits and monitoring procedures. Downey does not anticipate nonperformance by the other parties.

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

          Downey utilizes financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to originate fixed and variable rate mortgage loans held for investment, undisbursed loan funds, lines and letters of credit, commitments to purchase loans and mortgage-backed securities for portfolio and commitments to invest in community development funds. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement Downey has in particular classes of financial instruments.

          Commitments to originate fixed and variable rate mortgage loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Undisbursed loan funds on construction projects and unused lines of credit on home equity and commercial loans include committed funds not disbursed. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by Downey to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Downey also enters into commitments to purchase loans and mortgage-backed securities, investment securities and to invest in community development funds.

          The following is a summary of commitments with off-balance sheet risk at the dates indicated.

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Commitments to originate adjustable rate loans

held for investment

$

340,849

$

139,145

$

201,662

$

338,222

$

508,426

Undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit

334,803

347,338

370,159

391,395

406,675


Page 10
Navigation Links

          Downey uses the same credit policies in making commitments to originate loans held for investment and lines and letters of credit as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. For commitments to originate loans held for investment, the commitment amounts represent exposure to loss from market fluctuations as well as credit loss. In regard to these commitments, adverse changes from market fluctuations are generally not hedged. Downey controls the credit risk of its commitments to originate loans held for investment through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. The credit risk involved in issuing lines and letters of credit requires the same creditworthiness evaluation as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Downey evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness.

          Downey receives collateral to support commitments when deemed necessary. The most significant categories of collateral include real estate properties underlying mortgage loans, liens on personal property and cash on deposit with Downey.

          Downey maintains an allowance for losses to provide for inherent losses for loan-related commitments associated with undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit. The allowance for losses on loan-related commitments was $1 million at March 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006.

Other Contractual Obligations

          Downey sells all loans without recourse. When a loan sold to an investor without recourse fails to perform according to the contractual terms of the note, the investor will typically review the loan file to determine whether defects in the origination process occurred and whether such defects give rise to a violation of a representation or warranty made to the investor in connection with the sale. If such a defect is identified, Downey may be required to either repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor for losses sustained. If there are no such defects, Downey has no commitment to repurchase the loan. During the first three months of 2007, Downey recorded repurchase or indemnification losses related to defects in the origination process of $0.3 million and repurchased $9 million of loans. Included in the repurchased loans were $8 million of one-to-four single family residential loans from Fannie Mae, due to the loans being outside Fannie Mae’s underwriting guidelines.

          The loan and servicing sale contracts may also contain provisions to refund sales price premiums to the purchaser if the related loans prepay during a period typically 90 days, but not to exceed 120 days from the sale’s settlement date. Downey reserved less than $1 million at March 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006 to cover the estimated loss exposure related to early payoffs. However, if all the loans related to those sales prepaid within the refund period, as of March 31, 2007, Downey’s maximum sales price premium refund would be $7.2 million.

          Through the normal course of operations, Downey has entered into certain contractual obligations. Downey’s obligations generally relate to the funding of operations through deposits and borrowings, loan servicing, as well as leases for premises and equipment. Downey has obligations under long-term operating leases, principally for building space and land. Lease terms generally cover a five-year period, with options to extend, and are non-cancelable. Downey also has vendor contractual relationships, but the contracts are not considered to be material.

          At March 31, 2007, scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit, FHLB advances and other borrowings, senior notes and future operating minimum lease commitments were as follows:

After 1

After 3

Within

Through 3

Through 5

Beyond

Total

(In Thousands)

1 Year

Years

Years

5 Years

Balance


Certificates of deposit

$

8,541,202

$

280,898

$

106,693

$

-

$

8,928,793

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

546,870

546,870

FHLB advances

880,000

418,197

-

-

1,298,197

Senior notes

-

-

-

198,305

198,305

Operating leases

5,259

7,901

3,613

760

17,533


Total other contractual obligations

$

9,973,331

$

706,996

$

110,306

$

199,065

$

10,989,698


Page 11
Navigation Links

Litigation

          On October 29, 2004, two former traditional branch employees brought an action in Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC323796, entitled “Margie Holman and Alice A. Mesec, et al. v. Downey Savings and Loan Association.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages for alleged unpaid regular and overtime wages and bonuses, inadequate meal and rest breaks, and related claims. The plaintiffs are seeking class action status to represent all other current and former Downey Savings employees who held the position of Customer Service Supervisor and/or Customer Service Representative at any time during the four years prior to October 29, 2004. Based on a review of the current facts and circumstances with retained outside counsel, (i) Downey Savings plans to oppose the claim and assert all appropriate defenses and (ii) management has provided for what is believed to be a reasonable estimate of exposure for this matter in the event of loss. While acknowledging the uncertainties of litigation, management believes that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on Downey’s operations, cash flows or financial position.

          On June 21, 2005, a former loan underwriting employee brought an action in Contra Costa Superior Court, Case No. C05-01293, entitled "Teresa Sims, et al. v. Downey Savings and Loan Association." The complaint seeks unspecified damages for alleged unpaid overtime wages and bonuses, inadequate meal and rest breaks, and related claims. The plaintiff is seeking class action status to represent all other current and former Downey Savings employees that held the position of loan underwriter, including, but not limited to, the job title of Senior Loan Underwriter within the State of California (a) at any time during the four years prior to June 21, 2005 and/or (b) who was employed by Downey Savings on or about September 30, 2002, when Downey Savings terminated an annual bonus program. Based on a review of the current facts and circumstances with retained outside counsel, (i) Downey Savings plans to oppose the claim and assert all appropriate defenses and (ii) management has provided for what is believed to be a reasonable estimate of exposure for this matter in the event of loss. While acknowledging the uncertainties of litigation, management believes that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on Downey’s operations, cash flows or financial position.

          Downey has been named as a defendant in other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, will have a material adverse effect on its operations, cash flows or financial position.

NOTE (4) – Income Taxes

          During the first quarter of 2007, FIN 48 was adopted. FIN 48 requires the affirmative evaluation that it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits of a tax position, that an enterprise is entitled to economic benefits resulting from positions taken in income tax returns. If a tax position does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the benefit of that position is not recognized in the financial statements. The impact of adoption resulted in an increase to the opening balance of retained earnings of $3.2 million, relating to the recognition of a previously unrecognized tax benefit associated with bad debt reserves for tax purposes. There are no other unrecognized tax benefits to be reported in Downey’s financial statements, and none are anticipated during the next 12 months. Accordingly, Downey’s effective tax rate has not been impacted by the adoption of FIN 48.

          The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") is currently examining Downey’s tax returns for 2004. All tax years subsequent to 2002 are subject to federal examination, while state tax returns for years subsequent to 2001 are subject to examination by taxing authorities. Downey has determined there is ambiguity surrounding the treatment of certain loan origination costs on its tax returns for 2003 through 2005. Since year-end 2006, Downey has made payments of taxes (previously accrued in prior periods) and interest to federal and state taxing authorities in the amount of $88.9 million for the purpose of avoiding penalties and further interest pending resolution of this ambiguity. The potential after-tax interest assessment related to Downey’s tax returns for 2003 through 2005 totals $10.8 million through the first quarter of 2007. Of this amount, $1.6 million has been accrued and reflected as additional income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statement of income for the current quarter and $9.2 million has been reflected as additional income taxes for 2004 through 2006 in this Form 10-Q and will be reflected in subsequent SEC filings. When applicable, Downey classifies interest (net of tax) and penalties on the underpayment of taxes as income tax expense.

          While the IRS may assert a $9.2 million penalty (including penalty interest) against Downey related to its 2004 tax return, Downey has determined it is unlikely any such penalty would be sustained and it would vigorously contest any penalty that would be proposed, and, accordingly, has not accrued this amount.

Page 12
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth the impact on beginning and ending retained earnings for the first quarter of 2007 from the prior period adjustments related to interest on taxes for the treatment of certain loan origination costs and the beginning of period adjustment related to bad debt reserves from the adoption of FIN 48.

Retained

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

Earnings


Balance at December 31, 2006, as previously reported

$

1,330,379

Prior period adjustment related to interest on taxes for the treatment of certain loan origination costs

(9,222)

Beginning of period adjustment for taxes related to tax bad debt reserves

3,179


Adjusted balance at January 1, 2007

1,324,336

Cash dividends on common stock—$0.12 per share

(3,342

)

Net income for the quarter ending March 31, 2007

42,863


Balance at March 31, 2007

$

1,363,857


          For discussion and summary of the amounts related to Downey’s adjustment of prior period data for the above mentioned tax matters, see Note (9) – Adjustment of Prior and Beginning Period Amounts.

NOTE (5) – Employee Stock Option Plans

          During 1994, Downey Savings and Loan Association ("Bank") adopted and the stockholders approved the Downey Savings and Loan Association 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”). The LTIP provided for the granting of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance awards and other awards. The LTIP specified an authorization of 434,110 shares (adjusted for stock dividends and splits) of the Bank’s common stock available for issuance under the LTIP. Effective January 23, 1995, Downey Financial Corp. and the Bank executed an amendment to the LTIP by which Downey Financial Corp. adopted and ratified the LTIP such that shares of Downey Financial Corp. shall be issued upon exercise of options or payment of other awards, for which payment is to be made in stock, in lieu of the Bank’s common stock. The LTIP terminated in 2004; however, options granted and outstanding at termination remain exercisable until the specific termination date of the option. At March 31, 2007, options for 52,914 shares were outstanding, all of which were exercisable at a weighted average option price per share of $25.44, which represented at least the fair market value of such shares on the date the options were granted and expire at December 31, 2008. At March 31, 2007, 381,239 shares of treasury stock existed that may be used to satisfy the exercise of the options or for payment of other awards. No other stock based plan exists.

          Downey historically measured its employee stock-based compensation arrangements under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for the stock option plan, as stock options were granted at fair value at the date of grant. Had compensation expense for Downey’s stock option plan been determined based on the fair value estimated using the Black-Scholes model at the grant date for previous awards, stock-based compensation would have been fully expensed over the vesting period as of December 31, 2002. Therefore, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, Downey’s net income and income per share would not have been reduced.

NOTE (6) – Earnings Per Share

          Earnings per share of common stock is calculated on both a basic and diluted basis based on the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding, excluding common shares in treasury. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted from the issuance of common stock that then shared in earnings.

Page 13
Navigation Links

          The following table presents a reconciliation of the components used to derive basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended March 31,


2007

2006


Weighted

Weighted

Average

Average

Net

Shares

Per Share

Net

Shares

Per Share

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

Income

Outstanding

Amount

Income

Outstanding

Amount


Basic earnings per share

$

42,863

27,853,783

$

1.54

$

43,697

27,853,783

$

1.57

Effect of dilutive stock options

-

30,247

-

-

29,438

-


Diluted earnings per share

$

42,863

27,884,030

$

1.54

$

43,697

27,883,221

$

1.57


          There were no options excluded from the computation of earnings per share due to anti-dilution.

NOTE (7) – Business Segment Reporting

          The following table presents the operating results and selected financial data by business segments for the periods indicated.

Real Estate

(In Thousands)

Banking

Investment

Elimination

Totals


Three months ended March 31, 2007

Net interest income

$

124,752

$

362

$

-

$

125,114

Provision for credit losses

617

-

-

617

Other income

16,932

756

-

17,688

Operating expense

65,275

368

-

65,643

Net intercompany income (expense)

12

(12

)

-

-


Income before income taxes

75,804

738

-

76,542

Income taxes

33,381

298

-

33,679


Net income

$

42,423

$

440

$

-

$

42,863


At March 31, 2007

Assets:

Loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

$

13,210,016

$

-

$

-

$

13,210,016

Investments in real estate and joint ventures

-

61,663

-

61,663

Other

2,015,777

28,402

(77,989

)

1,966,190


Total assets

15,225,793

90,065

(77,989

)

15,237,869


Equity

$

1,439,463

$

77,989

$

(77,989

)

$

1,439,463


Three months ended March 31, 2006

Net interest income

$

125,632

$

284

$

-

$

125,916

Provision of credit losses

10,057

-

-

10,057

Other income

20,671

2,539

-

23,210

Operating expense

60,797

735

-

61,532

Net intercompany income (expense)

87

(87

)

-

-


Income before income taxes

75,536

2,001

-

77,537

Income taxes

33,020

820

-

33,840


Net income

$

42,516

$

1,181

$

-

$

43,697


At March 31, 2006

Assets:

Loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

$

16,429,596

$

-

$

-

$

16,429,596

Investments in real estate and joint ventures

-

49,182

-

49,182

Other

1,364,430

29,974

(70,423

)

1,323,981


Total assets

17,794,026

79,156

(70,423

)

17,802,759


Equity

$

1,244,639

$

70,423

$

(70,423

)

$

1,244,639


Page 14
Navigation Links

NOTE (8) – Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157

          In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, ("SFAS 157"), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements, but does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. Additionally, it establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. Downey is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 157 will have on its financial condition and results of operations.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158

          In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, "Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), ("SFAS 158"), which requires employers to recognize the underfunded or overfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur through accumulated other comprehensive income. Additionally, SFAS 158 requires employers to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position. The new reporting requirements and related new footnote disclosure rules of SFAS No. 158 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The new measurement date requirement applies for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Adoption of SFAS 158 is not expected to have a material impact on Downey.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159

          In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("SFAS 159"), which provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities and to more easily understand the effect of the company’s choice to use fair value on its earnings. SFAS 159 also requires entities to display the fair value of the selected assets and liabilities on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other accounting standards, including fair value measurement disclosures in SFAS 157. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of Statement 157. Adoption of SFAS 159 is not expected to have a material impact on Downey.

NOTE (9) – Adjustment of Prior and Beginning Period Amounts

          Adjustments have been made to prior period financial statements for the tax matters discussed in Note (4) – Income Taxes.

Page 15
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth the impact to net income and earnings per share for financial statement purposes of the change in treatment of certain loan origination costs in Downey’s tax returns for 2003 through 2005. This table reflects by quarter for 2006 and by year for 2004 through 2006 the after-tax interest assessment that is recorded as additional income taxes, as interest begins accruing after the due date for filing each year’s tax return.

Net Income

Earnings Per Share (diluted)


(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per

Previously

Previously

Share Data)

Reported

Adjusted

Change

Reported

Adjusted

Change


2006:

1st quarter

$

44,757

$

43,697

$

(1,060

)

(2.4

)

%

$

1.61

$

1.57

$

(0.04

)

(2.7

)

%

2nd quarter

49,540

48,224

(1,316

)

(2.7

)

1.77

1.73

(0.04

)

(2.3

)

3rd quarter

57,176

55,620

(1,556

)

(2.7

)

2.05

1.99

(0.06

)

(2.7

)

4th quarter

53,701

52,115

(1,586

)

(3.0

)

1.93

1.87

(0.06

)

(3.2

)


Total 2006

205,174

199,656

(5,518

)

(2.7

)

7.36

7.16

(0.20

)

(2.7

)

2005

217,434

214,477

(2,957

)

(1.4

)

7.80

7.69

(0.11

)

(1.4

)

2004

107,662

106,915

(747

)

(0.7

)

3.85

3.83

(0.02

)

(0.6

)


Grand Total

$

530,270

$

521,048

$

(9,222

)

(1.7

)

%

$

19.01

$

18.68

$

(0.33

)

(1.7

)

%


          The following table sets forth the impact on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, September 30, 2006, June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 for the immaterial corrections.

(Dollars in Thousands)

As Reported

Adjustments

As Adjusted


Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006

Assets:

Other assets

$

124,029

$

(2,007

)

$

122,022

Total assets

16,209,389

(2,007

)

16,207,382

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

109,797

110,465

220,262

Deferred income taxes

103,250

(103,250

)

-

Total liabilities

14,806,932

7,215

14,814,147

Retained earnings

1,330,379

(9,222

)

1,321,157

Total stockholders’ equity

1,402,457

(9,222

)

1,393,235

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

16,209,389

$

(2,007

)

$

16,207,382


Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2006

Assets:

Other assets

$

120,493

$

(1,236

)

$

119,257

Total assets

16,982,793

(1,236

)

16,981,557

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

220,497

118,317

338,814

Deferred income taxes

121,869

(111,917

)

9,952

Total liabilities

15,630,564

6,400

15,636,964

Retained earnings

1,279,463

(7,636

)

1,271,827

Total stockholders’ equity

1,352,229

(7,636

)

1,344,593

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

16,982,793

$

(1,236

)

$

16,981,557


Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2006

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$

201,714

$

125,467

$

327,181

Deferred income taxes

132,498

(119,387

)

13,111

Total liabilities

16,174,615

6,080

16,180,695

Retained earnings

1,225,072

(6,080

)

1,218,992

Total stockholders’ equity

$

1,290,165

$

(6,080

)

$

1,284,085


Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2006

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$

189,552

$

128,424

$

317,976

Deferred income taxes

140,961

(123,660

)

17,301

Total liabilities

16,553,356

4,764

16,558,120

Retained earnings

1,178,317

(4,764

)

1,173,553

Total stockholders’ equity

$

1,249,403

$

(4,764

)

$

1,244,639


          The immaterial adjustments to the balance sheet and income statement had no impact on total cash flows from operating investing or financing activities.

Page 16
Navigation Links

ITEM 2. – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

          Certain statements under this caption may constitute “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements do not relate strictly to historical information or current facts. Some forward-looking statements may be identified by use of terms such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could” or “may.” Our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, competition in the geographic and business areas in which we conduct our operations, fluctuations in interest rates, credit quality, the outcome of the IRS audit currently underway and government regulation and factors, identified under Part II – Other Information Item 1A. – Risk Factors on page 50. We do not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statements were made, except as required by law.

OVERVIEW

          Our net income for the first quarter of 2007 totaled $42.9 million or $1.54 per share on a diluted basis, down $0.8 million or 1.9% from $43.7 million or $1.57 per share in the first quarter of 2006. For a discussion regarding revisions to prior period results, see Note (4) – Income Taxes on page 12 and Note (9) – Adjustment of Prior and Beginning Period Amounts on page 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          The decline in our net income between first quarters primarily reflected:

Those unfavorable items were partially offset by a $9.4 million decline in provision for credit losses.

          For the first quarter, our return on average assets was 1.09%, up from 1.00% a year ago, while our return on average equity was 12.10%, down from 14.28% a year ago.

          At March 31, 2007, assets totaled $15.238 billion, down $2.565 billion or 14.4% from a year ago. During the current quarter, assets declined $970 million or 6.0 % due primarily to declines of $865 million in loans held for investment and $95 million in loans held for sale. Included within loans held for investment at quarter end were $10.055 billion of one-to-four unit adjustable rate mortgages subject to negative amortization, down $1.145 billion from year-end 2006. These loans comprised 81% of the residential one-to-four unit adjustable rate portfolio at quarter end, compared to 92% a year ago. The amount of negative amortization included in loan balances increased $37 million during the current quarter to $358 million or 3.56% of loans subject to negative amortization. During the current quarter, approximately 31% of loan interest income represented negative amortization, up from both 29% in the fourth quarter of 2006 and 25% in the year-ago first quarter. At origination, these loans had a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of 73%.

          Loan originations (including purchases) totaled $1.261 billion in the current quarter, down $1.552 billion or 55.2% from $2.813 billion a year ago. Loans originated for sale declined $339 million or 34.6% to $641 million, while single family loans originated for portfolio declined $1.116 billion or 64.9% to $603 million. In addition to single family loans, $17 million of other loans were originated in the current quarter.

          Deposits totaled $11.647 billion at quarter end, down 4.5% from a year ago and down $137 million or 1.2% from year-end 2006. During the current quarter, one traditional branch was opened. At quarter end, the number of branches totaled 173 (169 in California and four in Arizona), up one branch from December 31, 2006. At quarter end, the average deposit size of our 82 traditional branches was $112 million, while the average deposit size of our 91 in-store branches was $27 million. Since the end of 2006, borrowings declined $766 million and represented 13.4% of total assets.

          Non-performing assets increased during the quarter by $33 million to $143 million and represented 0.94% of total assets, compared with 0.68% at year-end 2006 and 0.22% a year ago. The increase occurred in our residential loan category.

Page 17
Navigation Links

          At March 31, 2007, Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. (the “Bank”), our primary subsidiary, exceeded all regulatory capital requirements, with capital-to-asset ratios of 9.64% for both tangible and core capital and 19.57% for risk-based capital. These capital levels are significantly above the “well capitalized” standards defined by the federal banking regulators of 5% for core capital and 10% for risk-based capital.

Page 18
Navigation Links

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

          We have established various accounting policies which govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in Downey’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Certain accounting policies require us to make significant estimates and assumptions which could have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and we consider these to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions which could have a material impact on the future carrying value of assets and liabilities and our results of operations for the reporting periods. Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

          We believe the following are critical accounting policies that require the most judicious estimates and assumptions, which are particularly susceptible to significant change in the preparation of our financial statements:

Page 19
Navigation Links

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Interest Income

          Net interest income is the difference between the interest and dividends earned on loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities (“interest-earning assets”) and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings (“interest-bearing liabilities”). The spread between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities and the relative dollar amounts of these assets and liabilities principally affects net interest income.

          Our net interest income totaled $125.1 million in the first quarter of 2007, down $0.8 million or 0.6% from a year ago, reflecting a $1.7 billion or 10.2% decline in average interest-earning assets. The effective interest rate spread averaged 3.28% in the current quarter, up 0.31% from 2.97% a year ago, and up 0.06% from 3.22% in the fourth quarter of 2006. The increase in the effective interest rate spread between first quarters was primarily the result of two factors. First, interest-earning assets in the current quarter were funded with a higher proportion of interest free funds (the excess of interest-earning assets over interest-bearing deposits and borrowings), and the value of those funds was worth more due to the higher interest rate levels prevalent in the current quarter. Second, the yield on interest-earning assets rose more between first quarters than did the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Those two favorable items were partially offset by a lower proportion of loan prepayment fees to the amount of deferred loan origination costs written-off as a result of those payoffs. Loan prepayment fees in the first quarter of 2007 represented 84.5% of deferred loan origination costs written-off, compared to 97.4% a year ago. The decline was the result of a higher proportion of loans being repaid that were no longer subject to a prepayment fee.

          The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of:

The table also sets forth our net interest income, interest rate spread and effective interest rate spread. The effective interest rate spread reflects the relative level of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities and equals:

The table also sets forth our net interest-earning balance—the difference between the average balance of interest-earning assets and the average balance of total deposits and borrowings—for the quarters indicated. We included non-accrual loans in the average interest-earning assets balance. We included interest from non-accrual loans in interest income only to the extent we received payments and believe we will recover the remaining principal balance of the loans. We computed average balances for the quarter using the average of each month’s daily average balance during the periods indicated.

Page 20
Navigation Links

 

Three Months Ended


March 31, 2007

December 31, 2006

March 31, 2006


Average

Average

Average

Average

Yield/

Average

Yield/

Average

Yield/

(Dollars in Thousands)

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate


Average balance sheet data

Interest-earning assets:

Loans:

Loan prepayment fees

21,804

0.64

27,409

0.75

21,471

0.53

Write-off of deferred costs and

premiums from loan payoffs

(25,814

)

(0.76

)

(27,893

)

(0.76

)

(22,044

)

(0.54

)

All other

256,182

7.49

272,723

7.42

255,918

6.34


Total loans

$

13,678,775

$

252,172

7.37

%

$

14,703,050

$

272,239

7.41

%

$

16,137,510

$

255,345

6.33

%

Mortgage-backed securities

152

3

5.80

254

4

5.60

276

3

4.35

Investment securities (a)

1,578,946

21,645

5.56

1,472,000

18,390

4.96

848,460

9,615

4.60


Total interest-earnings assets

15,257,873

273,820

7.18

16,175,304

290,633

7.19

16,986,246

264,963

6.24

Non-interest-earning assets

469,512

450,768

419,058


Total assets

$

15,727,385

$

16,626,072

$

17,405,304


Transaction accounts:

Non-interest-bearing checking

$

755,063

$

-

-

%

$

776,986

$

-

-

%

$

699,971

$

-

-

%

Interest-bearing checking (b)

488,174

395

0.33

488,383

418

0.34

515,516

435

0.34

Money market

150,385

385

1.04

146,991

384

1.04

164,212

423

1.04

Regular passbook

1,243,823

2,949

0.96

1,311,124

3,225

0.98

1,727,033

4,384

1.03


Total transaction accounts

2,637,445

3,729

0.57

2,723,484

4,027

0.59

3,106,732

5,242

0.68

Certificates of deposit

9,004,183

109,846

4.95

9,117,252

111,897

4.87

8,904,238

86,593

3.94


Total deposits

11,641,628

113,575

3.96

11,840,736

115,924

3.88

12,010,970

91,835

3.10

FHLB advances and other borrowings (c)

2,227,592

31,830

5.79

2,867,151

41,234

5.71

3,689,386

43,914

4.83

Senior notes

198,289

3,301

6.66

198,245

3,300

6.66

198,112

3,298

6.66


Total deposits and borrowings

14,067,509

148,706

4.29

14,906,132

160,458

4.27

15,898,468

139,047

3.55

Other liabilities

243,070

351,312

283,060

Stockholders’ equity

1,416,806

1,368,628

1,223,776


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

15,727,385

$

16,626,072

$

17,405,304


Net interest income/interest rate spread

$

125,114

2.89

%

$

130,175

2.92

%

$

125,916

2.69

%

Excess of interest-earning assets over

deposits and borrowings

$

1,190,364

$

1,269,172

$

1,087,778

Effective interest rate spread

3.28

3.22

2.97


(a) Yields for securities available for sale are calculated using historical cost balances and are not adjusted for changes in fair value that are reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
(b) Included amounts swept into money market deposit accounts.
(c) The impact of swap contracts was included, with notional amounts totaling $430 million of receive-fixed, pay-3-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) variable interest, which contracts serve as a permitted hedge against a portion of our FHLB advances.
Page 21
Navigation Links

          Changes in our net interest income are a function of changes in both rates and volumes of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table sets forth information regarding changes in our interest income and expense for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, we have provided information on changes attributable to:

Interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability balances used in the calculations represent quarterly average balances computed using the average of each month’s daily average balance during the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended March 31,

2007 Versus 2006

Changes Due To


Rate/

(In Thousands)

Volume

Rate

Volume

Net


Interest income:

Loans

$

(38,893

)

$

42,141

$

(6,421

)

$

(3,173

)

Mortgage-backed securities

(1

)

1

-

-

Investment securities

8,278

2,016

1,736

12,030


Change in interest income

(30,616

)

44,158

(4,685

)

8,857


Interest expense:

Transaction accounts:

Interest-bearing checking

(23

)

(18

)

1

(40

)

Money market

(38

)

-

-

(38

)

Regular passbook

(1,227

)

(289

)

81

(1,435

)


Total transaction accounts

(1,288

)

(307

)

82

(1,513

)

Certificates of deposit

972

22,034

247

23,253


Total interest-bearing deposits

(316

)

21,727

329

21,740

FHLB advances and other

borrowings

(17,400

)

8,804

(3,488

)

(12,084

)

Senior notes

3

-

-

3


Change in interest expense

(17,713

)

30,531

(3,159

)

9,659


Change in net interest income

$

(12,903

)

$

13,627

$

(1,526

)

$

(802

)


Provision for Credit Losses

           During the current quarter, the provision for credit losses totaled $0.6 million, down $9.4 million from a year ago. Although the California residential real estate market continued to show signs of weakening during the current quarter, a $823 million or 6.2% drop in the single-family residential loan portfolio mitigated the need to increase the associated allowance for loan losses. For further information, see Allowance for Credit and Real Estate Losses on page 43.

Other Income

          Our total other income was $17.7 million in the current quarter, down $5.5 million from a year ago. Contributing to the decline between first quarters was:

          Below is a further detailed discussion of the major other income categories.

Page 22
Navigation Links

Loan and Deposit Related Fees

          Loan and deposit related fees totaled $8.8 million in the current quarter, up $0.3 million from a year ago. Loan related fees were down $0.2 million or 21.0%, while deposit related fees were up $0.5 million or 6.7%. Within deposit related fees, automated teller machine fees increased 7.3%, while other fees increased 6.5%.

          The following table presents a breakdown of loan and deposit related fees during the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Loan related fees

$

842

$

918

$

901

$

1,009

$

1,066

Deposit related fees:

Automated teller machine fees

2,305

2,346

2,419

2,410

2,149

Other fees

5,689

5,879

5,959

5,752

5,343


Total loan and deposit related fees

$

8,836

$

9,143

$

9,279

$

9,171

$

8,558


Real Estate and Joint Ventures Held for Investment

          Income from our real estate and joint ventures held for investment totaled $0.5 million in the current quarter, down $1.8 million from the year-ago quarter due primarily to higher operating charges from investments in joint ventures and lower gains from sales. The current quarter included gains of $0.5 million, compared with gains of $1.0 million a year ago.

          The following table sets forth the key components comprising our income from real estate and joint venture operations during the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Net rental operations

$

545

$

20

$

124

$

240

$

487

Net gains on sales of wholly owned real estate

22

3,051

-

-

Equity (deficit) in net income (loss) from

joint ventures

(91

)

760

2,156

2,313

1,802

Provision for losses on real estate and joint ventures

-

-

-

-

-


Total income from real estate and

joint ventures held for investment, net

$

476

$

780

$

5,331

$

2,553

$

2,289


Secondary Marketing Activities

          We service loans for others and those activities generated a loss of $0.4 million in the current quarter, compared with income of $0.2 million in the year-ago quarter. The primary reason for the unfavorable change was an increase in payoff and curtailment interest costs of $0.8 million.

          At March 31, 2007, MSRs, net of a $0.2 million valuation allowance, totaled $20.7 million or 0.88% of the $2.348 billion of associated loans serviced for others, little changed from a year ago. In addition to the loans we serviced for others with capitalized MSRs, at March 31, 2007, we serviced $3.659 billion of loans on a sub-servicing basis where we receive a fixed fee per loan, with no risk associated with changing MSR values.

Page 23
Navigation Links

          The following table presents a breakdown of the components of our loan servicing income (loss), net for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Net cash servicing fees

$

1,607

$

1,647

$

1,583

$

1,574

$

1,566

Payoff and curtailment interest cost (a)

(1,063

)

(1,269

)

(813

)

(233

)

(218

)

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights

(1,024

)

(1,087

)

(1,056

)

(1,029

)

(1,198

)

(Provision for) reduction of impairment of

mortgage servicing rights

44

(149

)

(91

)

140

39


Total loan servicing income (loss), net

$

(436

)

$

(858

)

$

(377

)

$

452

$

189


(a) Represents the difference between the contractual obligation to pay interest to the investor for an entire month and the actual interest received when a loan prepays prior to the end of the month. However, loan servicing activities do not include the benefit of the use of total loan repayments to increase net interest income.

          For further information regarding mortgage servicing rights, see Note 2 on page 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

          Net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities totaled $8.7 million in the current quarter, down $2.9 million from a year ago. The decline primarily reflected a lower volume of loans sold, as sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities we originated for sale declined from $876 million a year ago to $714 million in the current quarter. The current quarter included a $0.3 million gain due to the SFAS 133 impact of valuing derivatives associated with the sale of loans, compared with a SFAS 133 gain of $0.2 million in the year-ago quarter. Excluding the impact of SFAS 133, a gain equal to 1.19% on secondary market sales was realized in the current quarter, down from the year-ago gain of 1.30%.

          The following table presents a breakdown of the components of our net gains on sales of loans and mortgage-backed securities for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Mortgage servicing rights

$

1,341

$

2,122

$

837

$

1,285

$

1,022

All other components excluding SFAS 133

7,148

6,682

14,314

8,067

10,394

SFAS 133

251

(309

)

(304

)

(733

)

238


Total net gains on sales of loans

and mortgage-backed securities

$

8,740

$

8,495

$

14,847

$

8,619

$

11,654


Secondary marketing gain excluding SFAS

133 as a percentage of associated sales

1.19

%

1.23

%

1.68

%

0.91

%

1.30

%


Operating Expense

          Operating expense totaled $65.6 million in the current quarter, up $4.1 million or 6.7% from a year ago. The increase primarily reflected a $1.8 million increase associated with higher deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments and a $1.5 million or 3.6% increase in salaries and related costs.

Page 24
Navigation Links

          The following table presents a breakdown of key components comprising operating expense for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Salaries and related costs

$

42,234

$

40,464

$

38,943

$

40,873

$

40,780

Premises and equipment costs

8,809

9,207

8,804

8,410

8,538

Advertising expense

1,191

1,895

1,211

1,879

1,242

Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory

assessments

2,764

2,193

2,224

1,008

1,014

Professional fees

559

297

254

450

792

Other general and administrative expense

9,795

7,920

7,087

8,295

9,175


Total general and administrative expense

65,352

61,976

58,523

60,915

61,541

Net operation of real estate acquired in

settlement of loans

291

65

166

28

(9

)


Total operating expense

$

65,643

$

62,041

$

58,689

$

60,943

$

61,532


Provision for Income Taxes

          Our effective tax rate was 44.0% for the current quarter, compared with 43.6% a year ago. The difference in effective tax rates was due primarily to interest associated with a potential underpayment of taxes, as discussed in more detail below.

          The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") is currently examining Downey’s tax return for 2004. Downey has determined there is substantial ambiguity surrounding the treatment of certain loan origination costs on its tax returns for 2003 through 2005. The potential after-tax interest assessment related to Downey’s tax returns for 2003 through 2005 totals $10.8 million. Of that amount, $1.6 million was accrued for 2007 and has been recorded as additional income taxes in the current quarter, and $9.2 million was accrued for 2004 through 2006 and will be reflected in income taxes in those prior periods in future SEC filings (including this Form 10-Q). For further information on the impact of these prior period adjustments on previously filed financial statements, see Note (4) – Income Taxes on page 12 and Note (9) – Adjustment of Prior and Beginning Period Amounts on page 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Business Segment Reporting

          The previous discussion and analysis of the Results of Operations pertained to our consolidated results. This section discusses and analyzes the results of operations of our two business segments: banking and real estate investment. For further information, see Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 14.

          The following table presents by business segment our net income for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Banking net income

$

42,423

$

50,907

$

51,432

$

46,494

$

42,516

Real estate investment net income

440

1,208

4,188

1,730

1,181


Total net income

$

42,863

$

52,115

$

55,620

$

48,224

$

43,697


Banking

          Net income from our banking operations for the current quarter totaled $42.4 million, down slightly from a year ago. The decline between first quarters primarily reflected:

Page 25
Navigation Links

Those unfavorable items were mostly offset by a $9.4 million decline in provision for credit losses.

          The following table sets forth our banking operational results and selected financial data for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Net interest income

$

124,752

$

129,798

$

129,870

$

132,021

$

125,632

Provision for credit losses

617

245

9,640

6,662

10,057

Other income

16,932

16,549

25,090

18,188

20,671

Operating expense

65,275

61,995

59,801

60,652

60,797

Net intercompany income (expense)

12

(29

)

(38

)

(54

)

87


Income before income taxes

75,804

84,078

85,481

82,841

75,536

Income taxes

33,381

33,171

34,049

36,347

33,020


Net income

$

42,423

$

50,907

$

51,432

$

46,494

$

42,516


At period end

Assets:

Loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

$

13,210,016

$

14,170,750

$

15,135,543

$

15,938,573

$

16,429,596

Other

2,015,777

2,025,790

1,837,714

1,517,582

1,364,430


Total assets

15,225,793

16,196,540

16,973,257

17,456,155

17,794,026


Equity

$

1,439,463

$

1,393,235

$

1,344,593

$

1,284,085

$

1,244,639


Real Estate Investment

          Net income from real estate investment operations totaled $0.4 million in the current quarter, down from $1.2 million a year ago. The decrease primarily reflected higher operating charges from investments in joint ventures and lower gains from sales, partially offset by lower operating expense. Gains from sales totaled $0.5 million in the current quarter, compared to $1.0 million a year ago.

          The following table sets forth real estate investment operational results and selected financial data for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Net interest income

$

362

$

377

$

369

$

326

$

284

Other income

756

1,685

5,579

2,842

2,539

Operating expense

368

46

(1,112

)

291

735

Net intercompany income (expense)

(12

)

29

38

54

(87

)


Income before income taxes

738

2,045

7,098

2,931

2,001

Income taxes

298

837

2,910

1,201

820


Net income

$

440

$

1,208

$

4,188

$

1,730

$

1,181


At period end

Assets:

Investments in real estate and joint ventures

$

61,663

$

59,843

$

55,663

$

49,237

$

49,182

Other

28,402

28,548

28,978

31,541

29,974


Total assets

90,065

88,391

84,641

80,778

79,156


Equity

$

77,989

$

77,549

$

76,341

$

72,153

$

70,423


          Our investments in real estate and joint ventures amounted to $62 million at March 31, 2007, up from $60 million at December 31, 2006 and $49 million at March 31, 2006.

          For information on valuation allowances associated with real estate and joint venture loans, see Allowance for Credit and Real Estate Losses on page 43.

Page 26
Navigation Links

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Loans and Mortgage-Backed Securities

          Total loans and mortgage-backed securities, including those we hold for sale, declined $961 million during the current quarter to a total of $13.2 billion or 86.7% of total assets at March 31, 2007. Loans held for investment declined $865 million, as loan payoffs exceeded originations and loans held for sale declined $95 million.

          Our loan originations, including loans purchased, totaled $1.261 billion in the current quarter, down $1.552 billion or 55.2% from the $2.813 billion we originated in the year-ago first quarter and 5.9% below the $1.340 billion we originated in the fourth quarter of 2006. Loans originated for sale declined $339 million or 34.6% from a year ago to $641 million, while single family loans originated for portfolio declined $1.116 billion or 64.9% to $603 million. Our prepayment speed, which measures the annualized percentage of loans repaid, for one-to-four unit residential loans held for investment increased from 34% a year ago to 44% in the current quarter and was up slightly from 43% in the fourth quarter of 2006. During the current quarter, 89% of our residential one-to-four unit originations represented refinance transactions, including new loans to refinance existing loans which we or other lenders originated. This is down from 91% from the fourth quarter of 2006 but up from 87% in the year-ago first quarter.

          We originate one-to-four unit residential mortgage loans both with and without loan origination fees. In mortgage transactions for which we charge no origination fees, we receive a higher interest rate than those for which we charge fees. In addition, a prepayment fee on loans with no origination fees is generally required if prepaid within the first three years. These loans generally result in deferrable loan origination costs exceeding loan origination fees.

          Originations of adjustable rate residential one-to-four unit loans for portfolio, including loans purchased, totaled $603 million in the current quarter, down from $1.719 billion in the year-ago quarter but up from $555 million in the fourth quarter of 2006. Of the current quarter total:

Page 27
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth loans originated, including purchases, for investment and for sale during the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Loans originated and purchased

Investment portfolio:

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable by index:

COFI

$

99,782

$

170,394

$

339,128

$

612,586

$

1,309,298

MTA

6,838

44,200

11,820

3,206

209,134

LIBOR

123,226

70,457

69,768

77,753

11,396

CMT

31,047

28,175

53,633

43,975

-

Adjustable – fixed for 3-5 years

342,005

241,347

290,397

392,126

189,385

Fixed

-

-

-

69

155


Total residential one-to-four units

602,898

554,573

764,746

1,129,715

1,719,368

Other

17,500

6,605

15,744

49,059

113,670


Total for investment portfolio

620,398

561,178

780,490

1,178,774

1,833,038

Sale portfolio (a)

640,669

779,002

824,072

892,314

980,164


Total for investment and sale portfolios

$

1,261,067

$

1,340,180

$

1,604,562

$

2,071,088

$

2,813,202


(a) All residential one-to-four unit loans.

          The following table sets forth our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit adjustable rate loans by index, excluding our adjustable–fixed for 3-5 year loans which are still in their initial fixed rate period, at the dates indicated.

March 31, 2007

December 31, 2006

September 30, 2006

June 30, 2006

March 31, 2006


% of

% of

% of

% of

% of

(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable by index:

COFI

$

8,365,223

77

%

$

9,231,837

77

%

$

10,107,839

78

%

$

10,770,739

77

%

11,172,831

77

%

MTA

1,807,965

17

2,094,828

18

2,353,639

18

2,636,804

19

2,841,747

20

LIBOR

435,132

4

364,537

3

366,907

3

359,752

3

351,128

2

Other, primarily CMT

228,260

2

209,191

2

191,542

1

138,488

1

151,003

1


Total adjustable loans (a)

$

10,836,580

100

%

$

11,900,393

100

%

$

13,019,927

100

%

$

13,905,783

100

%

$

14,516,709

100

%


(a) Excludes residential one-to-four unit adjustable–fixed for 3-5 year loans still in their initial fixed rate period.

          Our adjustable rate mortgage loans generally:

          Most of our adjustable rate mortgage loans are option ARM products with an interest rate that adjusts monthly and a minimum monthly loan payment that adjusts annually. The start rate is lower than the fully-indexed rate and is the effective interest rate for the loan only during the first month. After the first month, interest accrues at the fully-indexed rate. The start rate, however, is used to calculate the minimum monthly loan payment for the first twelve months. The borrower is required to make at least the minimum monthly payment, but retains the option to make a larger payment to reduce loan principal and avoid negative amortization, or the addition to loan principal of accrued interest that exceeds the required minimum monthly loan payment. If the borrower chooses to make the required minimum monthly loan payment and the interest accrual, based on the fully-indexed rate, results in monthly interest due exceeding the payment amount, the loan balance will increase by the difference. These payment options are clearly defined in the loan documents signed by the borrower at funding and explained again on the borrower’s monthly statement.

Page 28
Navigation Links

          More particularly, these loans currently:

          The maximum home loan we make, except for a limited amount related to Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") activities, is equal to 97% of a property’s appraised value; however, any loan in excess of 80% of appraised value generally requires private mortgage insurance. Typically, this insures the loan down to a 75% loan-to-value ratio, consistent with secondary marketing requirements. A loan-to-value ratio is the proportion of the principal amount of the loan to the lower of the sales price or appraised value of the property securing the loan at origination. If a loan incurs negative amortization, the loan-to-value ratio could rise, which increases credit risk, and the fair value of the underlying collateral could be insufficient to satisfy fully the outstanding loan obligation in the event of a loan default.

          Our loan portfolio held for investment does contain loans previously originated with a limit on the maximum loan balance of 125% of the original loan amount. At March 31, 2007, loans with the higher 125% limit on the maximum loan balance represented only 3% of our adjustable rate one-to-four unit residential loan portfolio, while those with the 115% limit represented only 2% and those with the 110% limit represented 76%. We permit adjustable rate mortgage loans to be assumed by qualified borrowers.

          While start rates of our loan products fluctuate with the market, we do not use them to qualify a loan applicant. Rather, we qualify an applicant for adjustable rate mortgage loans using a fully-amortizing payment calculated from the higher of the fully-indexed rate or, currently, for our:

For interest-only loans, we qualify applicants at the interest-only payment amount based on the interest rate applicable to the fixed rate period of the loan program.

Page 29
Navigation Links

          As set forth in the following table, $10.1 billion or 81% of our residential one-to-four unit adjustable rate loans held for investment were subject to negative amortization at March 31, 2007, of which $358 million or 3.6% represented the amount of negative amortization included in the loan balance. The amount of negative amortization had a net increase of $37 million during the current quarter, as borrowers took advantage of the flexibility of this product. During the current quarter, approximately 31% of our loan interest income represented negative amortization, up from 29% in the fourth quarter of 2006 and 25% in the year-ago first quarter. At origination, these loans had a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of 73%. In addition, $1.9 billion or 15% of our residential one-to-four unit adjustable rate loans held for investment represented loans requiring interest only payments over the initial terms of the loans, generally the first three to five years.

Negative

Loan to

Current

Weighted

Amortization

Value

Loan to

Average

Loan

% of

Included in the

Ratio at

Value

Age

(Dollars in Thousands)

Balance

Total

Loan Balance

Origination

Ratio (a)

(Months)


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units subject to negative amortization:

At March 31, 2007:

With negative amortization:

Balance less than or equal to original loan amount

$

365,466

3

%

$

1,740

70

%

69

%

34

Balance greater than original loan amount

8,608,796

86

355,890

74

77

23


Total with negative amortization

8,974,262

89

357,630

73

76

23

Not utilizing negative amortization

1,080,655

11

-

69

65

48


Total loans subject to negative amortization

$

10,054,917

100

%

$

357,630

73

%

75

%

26

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit

adjustable rate loans

81

%


Total loans with interest only payments

$

1,876,201

68

%

68

%

11

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit

adjustable rate loans

15

%


At December 31 2006:

With negative amortization:

Balance less than or equal to original loan amount

$

477,873

4

%

$

1,933

70

%

69

%

31

Balance greater than original loan amount

9,320,945

83

318,533

73

76

20


Total with negative amortization

9,798,818

87

320,466

73

75

21

Not utilizing negative amortization

1,401,052

13

-

69

65

41


Total loans subject to negative amortization

$

11,199,870

100

%

$

320,466

73

%

74

%

23

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit

adjustable rate loans

85

%


Total loans with interest only payments

$

1,578,202

69

%

68

%

12

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit

adjustable rate loans

12

%


At March 31, 2006:

With negative amortization:

Balance less than or equal to original loan amount

$

1,011,396

7

%

$

2,772

70

%

70

%

20

Balance greater than original loan amount

9,953,964

72

178,787

73

74

15


Total with negative amortization

10,965,360

79

181,559

73

74

16

Not utilizing negative amortization

2,900,585

21

-

71

69

24


Total loans subject to negative amortization

$

13,865,945

100

%

$

181,559

72

%

73

%

17

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit

adjustable rate loans

92

%


Total loans with interest only payments

$

723,108

70

%

70

%

22

As a percentage of total residential one-to-four unit

adjustable rate loans

5

%


(a) Based on current loan balance relative to the lower of the appraised value or sales price at time of origination.
Page 30
Navigation Links

          We have other credit risk elements within our real estate loans held for investment besides loans subject to negative amortization or loans with interest-only payments. At March 31, 2007, these other credit risks included:

          Those risks are mitigated primarily by various minimum borrower credit requirements and maximum loan-to-value limitations. For example, at March 31, 2007, the average loan-to-value ratio at origination of our residential one-to-four unit loan portfolio was 72%. However, even with these requirements and limitations, our risk mitigation strategy is limited by potential defects in the underwriting process as well as potential changes in the loan-to-value ratio due to negative amortization and declines in home values. For example, while residential property values have increased over the past several years thereby further reducing our exposure to credit risk, home value declines emerged in certain markets we lend to in 2006. The uncertainty of future home value changes may materially impact the risk associated with our loan portfolio since 68% of these loans were originated since year-end 2004.

          While our historic credit experience has been good, option ARMs can present greater credit risk in sustained periods of rising interest rates, as borrowers may see their loan payments increase significantly when their payments recast to fully-amortizing payments. In addition, credit risk increases if home values decline. In light of continued increases in market interest rates and other unfavorable changes in the residential housing market, we increased the start rate on option ARM loans originated for portfolio beginning in March of 2006 in order to reduce the potential for negative amortization. Since our start rate remained higher than that of many of our competitors, our production of option ARM loans for portfolio did not offset loan payoffs for the last year. In September of 2006, we increased the competitiveness of our option ARM pricing by lowering the start rate for borrowers who have high FICO credit scores and low loan-to-value ratios, with the goal of stimulating additional loan production for our portfolio, while at the same time limiting our portfolio credit exposure. However, this pricing change has not resulted in loan production completely offsetting portfolio payoffs.

          In September, 2006, the federal banking agencies issued final guidance on non-traditional mortgage loan products that allow borrowers to defer repayment of principal and sometimes interest, including "interest-only" mortgage loans, and "payment option" adjustable rate mortgage loans where a borrower has flexible payment options, including payments that have the potential for negative amortization. While acknowledging that innovations in mortgage lending can benefit some consumers, the final guidance states that management should (1) assess a borrower’s ability to repay the loan, including any principal balances added through negative amortization, at the fully indexed rate that would apply after the incentive interest rate period, (2) recognize that certain nontraditional mortgage loans are untested in a stressed environment and warrant strong risk management standards as well as appropriate capital and loan loss reserves, and (3) ensure that borrowers have sufficient information to clearly understand loan terms and associated risks prior to making a product or payment choice. We have instituted some disclosure changes and are assessing what impact, if any, this new lending guidance will have on our loan underwriting guidelines; and we continue to closely monitor trends in residential housing and lending markets and will make adjustments, as deemed necessary.

           We also offer other types of adjustable rate product for portfolio that do not permit negative amortization and do not fall in the scope of the guidance, but those products are currently not as popular with borrowers.

Page 31
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit loans by the Fair Isaac Corporation credit score model ("FICO") of the borrower at origination at the dates indicated.

March 31, 2007

December 31, 2006

September 30, 2006

June 30, 2006

March 31, 2006


% of

% of

% of

% of

% of

(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

FICO score at Origination:

620 or below

$

564,407

5

%

$

645,004

5

%

$

741,310

5

%

$

855,396

6

%

$

984,652

7

%

621 to 659

3,104,677

25

3,344,594

25

3,601,342

25

3,755,084

25

3,788,331

25

660 to 719

4,721,195

38

5,095,599

39

5,469,547

39

5,736,445

39

5,861,341

39

720 and above

3,848,112

31

3,964,348

30

4,184,865

30

4,295,868

29

4,306,399

28

Not available

165,629

1

177,459

1

186,141

1

196,686

1

210,006

1


Total residential one-to-four units

$

12,404,020

100

%

$

13,227,004

100

%

$

14,183,205

100

%

$

14,839,479

100

%

$

15,150,729

100

%


Weighted average FICO score for

loan investment portfolio of

residential one-to-four units

694

692

692

691

690


          The following table sets forth our investment portfolio of residential one-to-four unit loans by original loan-to-value ratio at the dates indicated. For this table, the loan-to-value ratios have been updated to reflect the current loan balance and appraisal if private mortgage insurance has been removed.

March 31, 2007

December 31, 2006

September 30, 2006

June 30, 2006

March 31, 2006


% of

% of

% of

% of

% of

(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total

Amount

Total


Loan Investment Portfolio

Residential one-to-four units:

80% or below:

60% or less

$

1,839,882

15

%

$

1,940,772

15

%

$

2,048,086

14

%

$

2,148,624

14

%

$

2,187,876

14

%

61% to 70%

2,176,103

18

2,349,016

18

2,505,972

18

2,628,314

18

2,717,204

18

71% to 80%

7,763,469

63

8,271,605

62

8,877,059

63

9,225,868

62

9,313,806

62


Total 80% or below

11,779,454

95

12,561,393

95

13,431,117

95

14,002,806

94

14,218,886

94

81% to 85%:

With private mortgage insurance

90,228

1

96,683

1

110,452

1

124,623

1

143,620

1

Without private mortgage insurance

1,210

-

1,789

-

2,319

-

3,293

-

4,243

-


Total 81% to 85%

91,438

1

98,472

1

112,771

1

127,916

1

147,863

1

86% to 89%:

With private mortgage insurance

218,546

2

231,471

2

261,422

2

291,605

2

331,008

2

Without private mortgage insurance

5,005

-

5,960

-

6,687

-

6,603

-

6,328

-


Total 86% to 89%

223,551

2

237,431

2

268,109

2

298,208

2

337,336

2

90% and above:

With private mortgage insurance

281,334

2

300,546

2

341,158

2

380,351

3

417,974

3

Without private mortgage insurance (a)

24,948

-

25,569

-

26,405

-

26,491

-

24,693

-


Total 90% and above

306,282

2

326,115

2

367,563

2

406,842

3

442,667

3

Not available

3,295

-

3,593

-

3,645

-

3,707

-

3,977

-

Total residential one-to-four units

$

12,404,020

100

%

$

13,227,004

100

%

$

14,183,205

100

%

$

14,839,479

100

%

$

15,150,729

100

%


Weighted average loan-to-value ratio

for loan investment portfolio of

residential one-to-four units

72

72

72

72

72


(a) Primarily related to Community Reinvestment Act activities.

          We continue to originate residential fixed interest rate mortgage loans to meet consumer demand, but we intend to sell the majority of these loans. We expect to sell some of our production of adjustable rate loans into the secondary market to the extent we can do so profitably. We sold $714 million of loans and mortgage-backed securities in the current quarter, unchanged from the fourth quarter of 2006 but down from $876 million in the year-ago first quarter. All amounts were secured by residential one-to-four unit property, and at March 31, 2007, loans held for sale totaled $268 million.

          In addition to single family loans, $17 million of other loans were originated in the current quarter, up from $7 million in the fourth quarter of 2006, but down from $114 million in the year-ago quarter.

Page 32
Navigation Links

 

          At March 31, 2007, our unfunded loan application pipeline totaled $1.3 billion. Within that pipeline, we had commitments to borrowers for short-term interest rate locks, before the reduction of expected fallout, of $630 million, of which $290 million were related to residential one-to-four unit loans being originated for sale in the secondary market. Furthermore, at March 31, 2007, we had commitments for undrawn lines of credit of $292 million and loans in process of $43 million. We believe our current sources of funds will be adequate relative to these obligations.

          The following table sets forth the origination, purchase and sale activity relating to our loans and mortgage-backed securities for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Investment Portfolio

Loans originated:

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable

$

260,893

$

313,226

$

473,072

$

729,413

$

1,517,610

Adjustable – fixed for 3-5 years

342,005

241,347

290,397

392,126

189,385

Fixed

-

-

-

-

155


Total residential one-to-four units

602,898

554,573

763,469

1,121,539

1,707,150

Home equity loans and lines of credit

2,812

3,018

6,388

8,313

8,793

Residential five or more units – adjustable

435

-

560

525

68,583


Total residential

606,145

557,591

770,417

1,130,377

1,784,526

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

630

Construction

12,897

1,730

7,516

4,458

19,863

Land

-

71

313

33,903

15,102

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

1,356

1,786

967

1,860

699


Total loans originated

620,398

561,178

779,213

1,170,598

1,820,820

Residential one-to-four unit loans purchased

-

-

1,277

8,176

12,218


Total loans originated and purchased

620,398

561,178

780,490

1,178,774

1,833,038

Loan repayments

(1,560,187

)

(1,661,536

)

(1,563,517

)

(1,596,002

)

(1,393,957

)

Other net changes (a)

74,542

95,784

74,266

70,033

71,575


Increase (decrease) in loans held for investment, net

(865,247

)

(1,004,574

)

(708,761

)

(347,195

)

510,656


Sale Portfolio

Residential one-to-four unit loans:

Originated

631,268

778,519

823,656

890,191

979,000

Purchased

9,401

483

416

2,123

1,164

Loans transferred to the investment portfolio (a)

(16,234

)

(22,819

)

(10,722

)

(6,782

)

(3,840

)

Originated whole loans sold

(430,739

)

(474,578

)

(699,664

)

(751,702

)

(662,306

)

Loans exchanged for mortgage-backed securities

(283,691

)

(239,396

)

(203,492

)

(276,292

)

(213,980

)

Capitalized basis adjustment (b)

(754

)

(270

)

815

1,254

(1,066

)

Other net changes (c)

(4,604

)

(2,152

)

(5,272

)

(2,612

)

(1,949

)


Increase (decrease) in loans held for sale, net

(95,353

)

39,787

(94,263

)

(143,820

)

97,023


Mortgage-backed securities, net:

Received in exchange for loans

283,691

239,396

203,492

276,292

213,980

Sold

(283,691

)

(239,396

)

(203,492

)

(276,292

)

(213,980

)

Repayments

(135

)

(6

)

(6

)

(8

)

(6

)

Other net changes

1

-

-

-

-


Decrease in mortgage-backed securities

available for sale

(134

)

(6

)

(6

)

(8

)

(6

)


Increase (decrease) in loans held for sale and

mortgage-backed securities available for sale

(95,487

)

39,781

(94,269

)

(143,828

)

97,017


Total increase (decrease) in loans and

mortgage-backed securities, net

$

(960,734

)

$

(964,793

)

$

(803,030

)

$

(491,023

)

$

607,673


(a) Primarily included changes in undisbursed funds for lines of credit and construction loans, in loss allowances, in net deferred costs and premiums, in interest capitalized on loans (negative amortization), and from loans transferred to real estate acquired in settlement of loans or from (to) the held for sale portfolio.
(b) Reflected the change in fair value of the interest rate lock derivative from the date of rate lock to the date of funding.
(c) Primarily included repayments and the change in net deferred costs and premiums.
Page 33
Navigation Links

          The following table sets forth the composition of our loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolios at the dates indicated.

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Investment Portfolio

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable

$

10,715,218

$

11,786,038

$

12,896,352

$

13,774,904

$

14,375,672

Adjustable – fixed for 3-5 years

1,639,381

1,397,516

1,240,644

1,017,059

724,442

Fixed

49,421

43,450

46,209

47,516

50,615


Total residential one-to-four units

12,404,020

13,227,004

14,183,205

14,839,479

15,150,729

Home equity loans and lines of credit

168,442

187,939

211,713

232,746

250,804

Residential five or more units:

Adjustable

109,330

112,580

115,174

117,060

134,340

Fixed

898

908

936

1,040

1,092

Commercial real estate:

Adjustable

23,580

23,943

24,117

24,254

25,967

Fixed

2,716

2,757

2,793

2,837

2,879

Construction

61,955

52,922

58,157

67,609

78,095

Land

58,795

58,910

59,394

59,682

27,379

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

2,200

2,400

3,400

3,400

3,481

Consumer

6,143

6,778

6,073

6,303

6,658


Total loans held for investment

12,838,079

13,676,141

14,664,962

15,354,410

15,681,424

Increase (decrease) for:

Undisbursed loan funds

(43,709

)

(40,208

)

(48,635

)

(58,390

)

(59,222

)

Net deferred costs and premiums

208,425

232,294

256,315

275,797

290,116

Allowance for losses

(60,758

)

(60,943

)

(60,784

)

(51,198

)

(44,504

)


Total loans held for investment, net

12,942,037

13,807,284

14,811,858

15,520,619

15,867,814


Sale Portfolio

Loans held for sale:

Residential one-to-four units

266,162

358,128

318,414

411,086

556,365

Net deferred costs and premiums

2,156

4,789

4,445

6,851

6,646

Capitalized basis adjustment (a)

(456

)

298

569

(246

)

(1,500

)


Total loans held for sale, net

267,862

363,215

323,428

417,691

561,511

Mortgage-backed securities available for sale:

Adjustable

117

251

257

263

271

Fixed

-

-

-

-

-


Total mortgage-backed securities available for sale

117

251

257

263

271


Total loans held for sale and mortgage-backed

securities available for sale

267,979

363,466

323,685

417,954

561,782


Total loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

$

13,210,016

$

14,170,750

$

15,135,543

$

15,938,573

$

16,429,596


(a) Reflected the change in fair value of the interest rate lock derivative from the date of rate lock to the date of funding.

          We carry loans for sale at the lower of cost or fair value. At March 31, 2007, no valuation allowance was required as the fair value exceeded book value on an aggregate basis.

          We carry mortgage-backed securities available for sale at fair value which, at March 31, 2007, was essentially equal to our cost basis.

Page 34
Navigation Links

Investment Securities

          The following table sets forth the composition of our investment securities portfolios at the dates indicated.

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Federal funds

$

-

$

1

$

1

$

2

$

-

Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury

-

-

-

-

-

Government sponsored entities

1,411,196

1,433,113

1,162,551

892,109

730,338

Other

62

63

63

63

64


Total investment securities

$

1,411,258

$

1,433,177

$

1,162,615

$

892,174

$

730,402


          The fair value of temporarily impaired investment securities, the amount of unrealized losses and the length of time these unrealized losses existed as of March 31, 2007 are presented in the following table. The $1 million unrealized loss on investment securities that have been in a loss position for less than 12 months and the $3 million unrealized loss on investment securities that have been in a loss position for more than 12 months are due to changes in market interest rates and are not considered to be other than temporary. We have the intent and ability to hold the securities until that temporary impairment is eliminated.

Less than 12 months

12 months or longer

Total


Unrealized

Unrealized

Unrealized

(In Thousands)

Fair Value

Losses

Fair Value

Losses

Fair Value

Losses


Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

Government sponsored entities

599,196

804

661,943

2,621

1,261,139

3,425

Other

-

-

-

-

-

-


Total temporarily impaired securities

$

599,196

$

804

$

661,943

$

2,621

$

1,261,139

$

3,425


          The following table sets forth the maturities of our investment securities and their weighted average yields at March 31, 2007.

Amount Due as of March 31, 2007


In 1 Year

After 1 Year

After 5 Years

After

(Dollars in Thousands)

or Less

Through 5 Years

Through 10 Years

10 Years

Total


Federal funds

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

Weighted average yield

-

%

-

%

-

%

-

%

-

%

Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury

-

-

-

-

-

Weighted average yield

-

%

-

%

-

%

-

%

-

%

Government sponsored entities (a)

41,531

987,680

381,985

-

1,411,196

Weighted average yield

4.24

%

5.56

%

5.01

%

-

%

5.37

%

Other

-

-

-

62

62

Weighted average yield

-

%

-

%

-

%

6.25

%

6.25

%


Total investment securities

$

41,531

$

987,680

$

381,985

$

62

$

1,411,258

Weighted average yield

4.24

%

5.56

%

5.01

%

6.25

%

5.37

%


(a) At March 31, 2007, 35% of our investment securities had step-up provisions that stipulate increases in the coupon rate ranging from 0.50% to 2.00% at various specified dates ranging from June 2007 to December 2012. In addition, at March 31, 2007, all of these investment securities contained call provisions from April 2007 to August 2015. Yields for investment securities available for sale are calculated using historical cost balances and are not adjusted for changes in fair value that are reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
Page 35
Navigation Links

Deposits

          At March 31, 2007, our deposits totaled $11.6 billion, down $551 million or 4.5% from the year-ago level and $137 million or 1.2% from year-end 2006. Compared with the year-ago period, our transaction accounts (i.e., checking, money market and regular passbook) declined $384 million or 12.4% due to a decline of $425 million in regular passbook accounts. Given the relatively low level of interest rates in prior periods, certain of our depositors moved monies from certificates of deposit to transaction accounts, primarily regular passbook accounts, as they seemed more interested in liquidity. As market interest rates have risen, monies have flowed back into certificates of deposit. Checking accounts have increased $54 million or 4.2% from a year ago.

          During the current quarter, one traditional branch was opened. This brings our total number of branches to 173, of which 91 were in-store and four were located in Arizona. At March 31, 2007, the average deposit size of our 82 traditional branches was $112 million, while the average deposit size of our 91 in-store branches was $27 million.

          The following table sets forth information concerning our deposits and weighted average rates paid at the dates indicated.

March 31, 2007

December 31, 2006

September 30, 2006

June 30, 2006

March 31, 2006


Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

Average

Average

Average

Average

Average

(Dollars in Thousands)

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount

Rate

Amount


Transaction accounts:

Non-interest-bearing

checking

-

%

$

831,708

-

%

$

769,086

-

%

$

776,696

-

%

$

751,446

-

%

$

758,055

Interest-bearing

checking (a)

0.28

505,975

0.28

493,620

0.28

486,226

0.29

497,313

0.29

525,564

Money market

1.05

153,291

1.04

148,448

1.04

147,812

1.05

162,213

1.05

166,496

Regular passbook

0.95

1,227,664

0.97

1,269,420

0.98

1,355,595

1.00

1,483,890

1.02

1,652,549


Total transaction

accounts

0.54

2,718,638

0.57

2,680,574

0.58

2,766,329

0.62

2,894,862

0.65

3,102,664

Certificates of deposit:

Less than 2.00%

1.30

24,106

1.29

22,566

1.28

22,484

1.31

29,690

1.49

47,149

2.00-2.49

2.29

686

2.29

686

2.46

11,567

2.37

24,559

2.37

81,014

2.50-2.99

2.80

11,062

2.80

25,375

2.84

51,185

2.87

92,839

2.81

159,742

3.00-3.49

3.29

99,309

3.30

128,294

3.27

153,871

3.28

176,414

3.34

368,255

3.50-3.99

3.89

144,544

3.89

237,155

3.87

267,610

3.89

1,190,947

3.86

2,681,838

4.00-4.49

4.25

271,609

4.31

692,386

4.26

1,574,479

4.24

3,765,400

4.23

4,422,839

4.50-4.99

4.90

4,235,873

4.82

2,722,829

4.74

3,340,812

4.72

3,408,252

4.68

1,320,831

5.00-5.49

5.17

3,871,787

5.19

5,008,378

5.20

3,514,530

5.08

304,776

5.07

14,571

5.50 and greater

5.55

269,817

5.54

266,626

5.54

242,891

-

-

-

-


Total certificates

of deposit

4.97

8,928,793

4.94

9,104,295

4.78

9,179,429

4.36

8,992,877

4.10

9,096,239


Total deposits

3.94

%

$

11,647,431

3.95

%

$

11,784,869

3.81

%

$

11,945,758

3.45

%

$

11,887,739

3.22

%

$

12,198,903


(a) Included amounts swept into money market deposit accounts.
Page 36
Navigation Links

Borrowings

          At March 31, 2007, our borrowings totaled $2.0 billion, down $2.0 billion from a year ago and $766 million from year-end 2006. At quarter end, we borrowed $547 million of funds through transactions in which securities are sold under agreements to repurchase. These repurchase agreements are entered into with selected major securities dealers, using securities of government sponsored entities from our portfolio as collateral.

          The following table sets forth information concerning our FHLB advances and other borrowings at the dates indicated.

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$

546,870

$

469,971

$

463,678

$

255,042

$

-

Federal Home Loan Bank advances (a)

1,298,197

2,140,785

2,680,546

3,499,450

3,825,811

Senior notes

198,305

198,260

198,216

198,172

198,129


Total borrowings

$

2,043,372

$

2,809,016

$

3,342,440

$

3,952,664

$

4,023,940


Weighted average rate on borrowings during

the quarter (a)

5.86

%

5.77

%

5.71

%

5.33

%

4.92

%

Total borrowings as a percentage of total assets

13.41

17.33

19.68

22.63

22.60


(a) Included the impact of interest rate swap contracts, with notional amounts totaling $430 million of receive-fixed, pay-3-month LIBOR variable interest, which contracts serve as a permitted hedge against a portion of our FHLB advances.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

          We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries that we control. We account for other affiliates, including joint ventures, in which we do not exhibit significant control or have majority ownership, by the equity method of accounting. For those relationships in which we own less than 20%, we generally carry them at cost. In the course of our business, we participate in real estate joint ventures through our wholly-owned subsidiary, DSL Service Company. Our real estate joint ventures do not require consolidation as a result of applying the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation 46 (revised December 2003).

          We also utilize financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to originate fixed and variable rate mortgage loans held for investment, undisbursed loan funds, lines and letters of credit, commitments to purchase loans and mortgage-backed securities for our portfolio and commitments to invest in community development funds. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in particular classes of financial instruments. For further information, see Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk on page 38 and Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 8.

          We use the same credit policies in making commitments to originate or purchase loans, lines of credit and letters of credit as we do for on-balance sheet instruments. For commitments to originate loans held for investment, the contract amounts represent exposure to loss from market fluctuations as well as credit loss. In regard to these commitments, adverse changes from market fluctuations are generally not hedged. We control the credit risk of our commitments to originate loans held for investment through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures.

          We do not dispose of troubled loans or problem assets by means of unconsolidated special purpose entities.

Transactions with Related Parties

          There are no significant related party transactions required to be disclosed in accordance with FASB Statement No. 57, Related Party Disclosures. Loans to our executive officers and directors were made in the ordinary course of business and were made on substantially the same terms as comparable transactions.

Page 37
Navigation Links

Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk

          Market risk is the risk of loss or reduced earnings from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk in our lending and deposit taking activities. Interest rate risk primarily occurs to the degree that our interest-bearing liabilities reprice or mature on a different basis and frequency than our interest-earning assets. Since our earnings depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest and dividends earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, our principal objectives are to actively monitor and manage the effects of adverse changes in interest rates on net interest income. Our primary strategy in managing interest rate risk is to emphasize the origination for investment of adjustable rate mortgage loans or loans with relatively short maturities. Interest rates on adjustable rate mortgage loans are primarily tied to COFI, MTA, LIBOR and CMT. We also may execute swap contracts to change interest rate characteristics of our interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities to better manage interest rate risk.

          In addition to the interest rate risk associated with our lending for investment and deposit-taking activities, we also have market risk associated with our secondary marketing activities. Changes in mortgage interest rates, primarily fixed rate mortgage loans, impact the fair value of loans held for sale as well as our interest rate lock commitment derivatives, where we have committed to an interest rate with a potential borrower for a loan we intend to sell. Our objective is to hedge against fluctuations in interest rates through the use of loan forward sale and purchase contracts with government-sponsored enterprises and whole loan sale contracts with various parties. These contracts are typically obtained at the time the interest rate lock commitments are made. Therefore, as interest rates fluctuate, the changes in the fair value of our interest rate lock commitments and loans held for sale tend to be offset by changes in the fair value of the hedge contracts. We continue to hedge as previously done before the issuance of SFAS 133. As applied to our risk management strategies, SFAS 133 may increase or decrease reported net income and stockholders’ equity, depending on interest rates and other variables affecting the fair values of derivative instruments and hedged items, but will have no effect on the overall economics of the transactions. The method used for assessing the effectiveness of a hedging derivative, as well as the measurement approach for determining the ineffective aspects of the hedge, is established at the inception of the hedge. We generally do not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes.

          Changes in mortgage interest rates also impact the value of our MSRs. Rising interest rates typically result in slower prepayment speeds on the loans being serviced for others which increase the value of MSRs. Declining interest rates typically result in faster prepayment speeds which decrease the value of MSRs. Over time, we may use derivatives or securities to provide an economic hedge against value changes in our MSRs.

Page 38
Navigation Links

          One measure of our exposure to differential changes in interest rates between assets and liabilities is shown in the following table which sets forth the repricing frequency of our major asset and liability categories as of March 31, 2007, as well as other information regarding the repricing and maturity differences between our interest-earning assets and total deposits and borrowings in future periods. We refer to these differences as “gap.” We have determined the repricing frequencies by reference to projected maturities, based upon contractual maturities as adjusted for scheduled repayments and “repricing mechanisms”—provisions for changes in the interest and dividend rates of assets and liabilities. We assume prepayment rates on substantially all of our loan portfolio based upon our historical loan prepayment experience to anticipate future prepayments. Repricing mechanisms on a number of our assets are subject to limitations, such as caps on the amount that interest rates and payments on our loans may adjust, and accordingly, these assets may not respond to changes in market interest rates as completely or rapidly as our liabilities. The interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities illustrated in the following table would vary substantially if we used different assumptions or if actual experience differed from the assumptions set forth.

March 31, 2007


After 6 Months

After 1 Year

After 5 Years

Within

Through 12

Through 5

Through 10

Beyond

Total

(Dollars in Thousands)

6 Months

Months

Years

Years

10 Years

Balance


Interest-earning assets:

Investment securities and stock (a)

$

859,672

$

237,260

$

440,451

$

-

$

-

$

1,537,383

Loans and mortgage-backed securities, net: (b)

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential one-to-four units:

Adjustable

11,231,923

319,673

1,078,964

-

-

12,630,560

Fixed

150,040

4,091

22,132

11,945

6,529

194,737

Home equity loans and lines of credit

166,639

133

692

85

-

167,549

Residential five or more units:

Adjustable

71,118

17,091

6,687

-

-

94,896

Fixed

100

94

461

193

43

891

Commercial real estate

18,173

2,749

4,491

25

-

25,438

Construction

42,246

-

-

-

-

42,246

Land

46,600

-

-

-

-

46,600

Non-mortgage loans:

Commercial

1,128

-

-

-

-

1,128

Consumer

5,851

3

-

-

-

5,854

Mortgage-backed securities

117

-

-

-

-

117


Total loans and mortgage-backed securities, net

11,733,935

343,834

1,113,427

12,248

6,572

13,210,016


Total interest-earning assets

$

12,593,607

$

581,094

$

1,553,878

$

12,248

$

6,572

$

14,747,399


Transaction accounts:

Non-interest-bearing checking

$

831,708

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

831,708

Interest-bearing checking (c)

505,975

-

-

-

-

505,975

Money market (d)

153,291

-

-

-

-

153,291

Regular passbook (d)

1,227,664

-

-

-

-

1,227,664


Total transaction accounts

2,718,638

-

-

-

-

2,718,638

Certificates of deposit (e)

6,697,300

1,843,902

387,591

-

-

8,928,793


Total deposits

9,415,938

1,843,902

387,591

-

-

11,647,431

FHLB advances and other borrowings

1,426,870

-

418,197

-

-

1,845,067

Senior notes

-

-

-

198,305

-

198,305

Impact of swap contracts hedging borrowings

430,000

-

(430,000

)

-

-

-


Total deposits and borrowings

$

11,272,808

$

1,843,902

$

375,788

$

198,305

$

-

$

13,690,803


Excess (shortfall) of interest-earning assets

over deposits and borrowings

$

1,320,799

$

(1,262,808

)

$

1,178,090

$

(186,057

)

$

6,572

$

1,056,596

Cumulative gap

1,320,799

57,991

1,236,081

1,050,024

1,056,596

Cumulative gap – as a percentage of total assets:

March 31, 2007

8.67

%

0.38

%

8.11

%

6.89

%

6.93

%

December 31, 2006

10.86

0.92

8.29

7.14

7.18

March 31, 2006

19.61

8.60

7.27

6.24

6.29


(a) Includes FHLB stock and is based on contractual maturity and repricing date.
(b) Based on contractual maturity, repricing date and projected repayment and prepayments of principal.
(c) Included amounts swept into money market deposit accounts and is subject to immediate repricing.
(d) Subject to immediate repricing.
(e) Based on contractual maturity and repricing date.
Page 39
Navigation Links

          Our six-month gap at March 31, 2007 was a positive 8.67%. This means that more interest-earning assets mature or reprice within six months than total deposits and borrowings. This compares to our positive six-month gap of 10.86% at December 31, 2006 and 19.61% a year ago, which reflected a larger repricing mismatch between interest-earning assets and deposits and borrowings.

          We continue to emphasize the origination of adjustable rate mortgages for our investment portfolio. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2007, we originated and purchased for investment $3.1 billion of adjustable rate loans which represented essentially all of the loans we originated and purchased for investment during the period.

          At March 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006 essentially all of our interest-earning assets mature, reprice or are estimated to prepay within five years. Essentially all of our loans held for investment and mortgage-backed securities portfolios consisted of adjustable rate loans and loans with a due date of five years or less, and totaled $12.8 billion at March 31, 2007, compared with $13.6 billion at December 31, 2006 and $15.6 billion a year ago. During the current quarter, we continued to offer residential fixed rate loan products to our customers primarily for sale in the secondary market. We originate fixed rate loans primarily for sale in the secondary market and price them accordingly to create loan servicing income and to increase opportunities for originating adjustable rate mortgage loans. However, we may originate fixed rate loans for investment if these loans meet specific yield, interest rate risk and other approved guidelines, or to facilitate the sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure.

          The following table sets forth the interest rate spread between our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at the dates indicated.

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Weighted average yield: (a)

Loans and mortgage-backed securities

7.61

%

7.59

%

7.38

%

6.99

%

6.52

%

Investment securities (b)

5.37

5.38

5.26

4.97

4.66


Interest-earning assets yield

7.40

7.38

7.22

6.88

6.44


Weighted average cost:

Deposits

3.94

3.95

3.81

3.45

3.22

Borrowings:

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

5.29

5.30

5.27

5.30

-

Federal Home Loan Bank advances (c)

6.15

5.87

5.75

5.57

4.94

Senior notes

6.50

6.50

6.50

6.50

6.50


Total borrowings

5.95

5.82

5.73

5.60

5.02


Combined funds cost

4.24

4.31

4.23

3.99

3.67


Interest rate spread

3.16

%

3.07

%

2.99

%

2.89

%

2.77

%


(a) Excludes adjustments for non-accrual loans, amortization of net deferred costs to originate loans, premiums and discounts, prepayment and late fees and FHLB stock dividends.
(b) Includes the yield on investment securities accounted for on a trade-date basis but for which interest income will not be recognized until settlement. Yields for investment securities available for sale are calculated using historical cost balances and are not adjusted for changes in fair value that are reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
(c) Included the impact of interest rate swap contracts, with notional amounts totaling $430 million of receive-fixed, pay-3-month LIBOR variable interest, which contracts serve as a permitted hedge against a portion of our FHLB advances.

          The period-end weighted average yield on our loans and mortgage-backed securities increased to 7.61% at March 31, 2007, up from 7.59% at December 31, 2006 and 6.52% a year ago. At March 31, 2007, our adjustable rate mortgage portfolio of single family residential loans, including mortgage-backed securities, totaled $12.6 billion with a weighted average rate of 7.60%, compared with $13.5 billion with a weighted average rate of 7.56% at December 31, 2006, and $15.6 billion with a weighted average rate of 6.48% at March 31, 2006.

Page 40
Navigation Links

Problem Loans and Real Estate

Non-Performing Assets

          Non-performing assets consist of loans on which we have ceased accruing interest (which we refer to as non-accrual loans), loans restructured at an interest rate below market and real estate acquired in settlement of loans. Our non-performing assets totaled $143 million at March 31, 2007, up from $110 million at December 31, 2006 and $39 million at March 31, 2006. The increase in our non-performing assets during the current quarter was primarily due to an increase in our residential one-to-four unit category of $25 million. The non-performing land category consists of a single loan to develop residential lots. While this loan is deemed collateral dependent and value impaired, no significant loss is anticipated at this time. Of the total non-performing assets, real estate acquired in settlement of loans represented $17 million at March 31, 2007, up from $9 million at December 31, 2006 and less than $1 million at March 31, 2006. Our non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets was 0.94% at March 31, 2007, up from 0.68% at year-end 2006 and 0.22% at March 31, 2006.

          The following table summarizes our non-performing assets at the dates indicated.

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Non-accrual loans:

Residential one-to-four units

$

114,833

$

90,218

$

60,461

$

38,074

$

38,503

Land

11,345

11,345

-

-

-

Other

28

275

306

-

1


Total non-accrual loans

126,206

101,838

60,767

38,074

38,504

Real estate acquired in settlement of loans

17,212

8,524

5,761

1,254

385


Total non-performing assets

$

143,418

$

110,362

$

66,528

$

39,328

$

38,889


Allowance for loan losses:

Amount

$

60,758

$

60,943

$

60,784

$

51,198

$

44,504

As a percentage of non-accrual loans

48.14

%

59.84

%

100.03

%

134.47

%

115.58

%

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets

0.94

0.68

0.39

0.23

0.22


          At March 31, 2007, $26 million of our non-performing assets were located outside of California, compared with $10 million a year ago.

Delinquent Loans

          At March 31, 2007, loans delinquent 30 days or more as a percentage of total loans was 1.32%, up from 1.03% at December 31, 2006 and 0.37% at March 31, 2006. The increase from the prior year-ago quarter occurred primarily in our residential one-to-four units and land classifications. As a percentage of its loan category, delinquent residential one-to-four units increased from 0.38% at March 31, 2006 and 1.05% at December 31, 2006 to 1.27% at March 31, 2007. A higher incidence of delinquency is expected when the minimum payments on our option ARM and hybrid ARM loans reset, particularly when our option ARM loans reach their maximum loan balance permitted under the terms of the loan. Our land delinquency category consists of a single loan to develop residential lots. While this loan is deemed collateral dependent and value impaired, no significant loss is anticipated at this time. These increases in delinquency are considered when we analyze the adequacy of our loan loss allowance.

Page 41
Navigation Links

          The following table indicates the amounts of our past due loans at the dates indicated.

March 31, 2007

December 31, 2006


30-59

60-89

90+

30-59

60-89

90+

(Dollars in Thousands)

Days

Days

Days (a)

Total

Days

Days

Days (a)

Total


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

47,770

$

31,510

$

82,091

$

161,371

$

56,962

$

24,100

$

62,887

$

143,949

Home equity loans and lines of credit

256

32

15

303

20

212

259

491

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Land

-

-

11,345

11,345

-

-

-

-


Total real estate loans

48,026

31,542

93,451

173,019

56,982

24,312

63,146

144,440

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

6

50

13

69

60

1

16

77


Total delinquent loans

$

48,032

$

31,592

$

93,464

$

173,088

$

57,042

$

24,313

$

63,162

$

144,517


Delinquencies as a percentage of total loans

0.37

%

0.24

%

0.71

%

1.32

%

0.41

%

0.17

%

0.45

%

1.03

%


September 30, 2006

June 30, 2006


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

42,522

$

20,872

$

37,214

$

100,608

$

28,007

$

11,877

$

23,879

$

63,763

Home equity loans and lines of credit

-

173

297

470

400

-

-

400

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Land

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-


Total real estate loans

42,522

21,045

37,511

101,078

28,407

11,877

23,879

64,163

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

63

10

9

82

13

31

-

44


Total delinquent loans

$

42,585

$

21,055

$

37,520

$

101,160

$

28,420

$

11,908

$

23,879

$

64,207


Delinquencies as a percentage of total loans

0.28

%

0.14

%

0.25

%

0.68

%

0.18

%

0.08

%

0.15

%

0.41

%


March 31, 2006


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

26,669

$

10,491

$

22,110

$

59,270

Home equity loans and lines of credit

61

-

-

61

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

Land

-

-

-

-


Total real estate loans

26,730

10,491

22,110

59,331

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

Consumer

61

6

1

68


Total delinquent loans

$

26,791

$

10,497

$

22,111

$

59,399


Delinquencies as a percentage of total loans

0.17

%

0.06

%

0.14

%

0.37

%


(a) All 90 day or greater delinquencies are on non-accrual status and reported as part of non-performing assets.
Page 42
Navigation Links

Allowance for Credit and Real Estate Losses

          We maintain a valuation allowance for credit and real estate losses to provide for losses inherent in those portfolios. The allowance for credit losses includes an allowance for loan losses reported as a reduction of loans held for investment and the allowance for loan-related commitments reported in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance quarterly to maintain the allowance at levels sufficient to provide for inherent losses at the balance sheet date.

          We use an internal asset review system and loss allowance methodology designed to provide for timely recognition of problem assets and an adequate allowance to cover asset and loan-related commitment losses. The amount of the allowance is based upon the total of general valuation allowances, allocated allowances and an unallocated allowance. General valuation allowances relate to assets and loan-related commitments with no well-defined deficiency or weakness and take into consideration losses that are imbedded within the portfolio but have not yet been realized. Allocated allowances relate to assets with well-defined deficiencies or weaknesses. If we determine the carrying value of our asset exceeds the net fair value and no alternative payment source exists, then a specific allowance is recorded for the amount of that difference. The unallocated allowance is more subjective and is reviewed quarterly to take into consideration estimation errors and economic trends that are not captured in determining the general valuation and allocated allowances.

          Provision for credit losses totaled $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2007, compared with $10.1 million a year ago. The California residential real estate market continued to show signs of weakening, with a decline in prices and an increase in loan defaults. In addition, capitalized interest balances continued to increase on negative amortizing loans. If this tendency continues, certain borrowers may reach their limit of negative amortization permitted under the terms of their loan, thereby resulting in an increase in their minimum monthly loan payment and the potential for higher delinquencies. Despite these trends, an $823 million or 6.2% drop in the single-family residential loan portfolio in the current quarter mitigated the need to increase the associated allowance for loan losses. The allowance declined $0.1 million in the current quarter, reflecting a decrease of $4.9 million in the general valuation allowance and an increase of $4.8 million in the allocated allowance. At March 31, 2007, the allowance for credit losses was $62 million, comprised of $61 million for loan losses and $1 million for unfunded loan commitments virtually unchanged from year-end. Unfunded loan commitments are reported in the category accounts payable and accrued liabilities. There was no change in our unallocated allowance of $2.8 million.

          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for losses on loans and loan-related commitments for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Allowance for loan losses

Balance at beginning of period

$

60,943

$

60,784

$

51,198

$

44,504

$

34,601

Provision

507

411

9,777

6,701

9,974

Charge-offs

(843

)

(376

)

(197

)

(12

)

(76

)

Recoveries

151

124

6

5

5


Balance at end of period

$

60,758

$

60,943

$

60,784

$

51,198

$

44,504


Allowance for loan-related commitments

Balance at beginning of period

$

1,055

$

1,221

$

1,358

$

1,397

$

1,314

Provision (reduction)

110

(166

)

(137

)

(39

)

83


Balance at end of period

$

1,165

$

1,055

$

1,221

$

1,358

$

1,397


Total allowance for credit losses

Balance at beginning of period

$

61,998

$

62,005

$

52,556

$

45,901

$

35,915

Provision

617

245

9,640

6,662

10,057

Charge-offs

(843

)

(376

)

(197

)

(12

)

(76

)

Recoveries

151

124

6

5

5


Balance at end of period

$

61,923

$

61,998

$

62,005

$

52,556

$

45,901


Page 43
Navigation Links

          The following table presents gross charge-offs, gross recoveries and net charge-offs by category of loan for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Gross loan charge-offs

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

823

$

358

$

166

$

-

$

25

Home equity loans and lines of credit

-

-

-

-

-

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

-

Land

-

-

-

-

-

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

20

18

31

12

51


Total gross loan charge-offs

843

376

197

12

76


Gross loan recoveries

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

150

120

-

-

-

Home equity loans and lines of credit

-

-

-

-

-

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

-

Land

-

-

-

-

-

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

1

4

6

5

5


Total gross loan recoveries

151

124

6

5

5


Net loan charge-offs

(recoveries)

Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

673

238

166

-

25

Home equity loans and lines of credit

-

-

-

-

-

Five or more units

-

-

-

-

-

Commercial real estate

-

-

-

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

-

Land

-

-

-

-

-

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer

19

14

25

7

46


Total net loan charge-offs

$

692

$

252

$

191

$

7

$

71


Net loan charge-offs as a percentage

of average loans

0.02

%

0.01

%

-

%

-

%

-

%


Page 44
Navigation Links

          The following table indicates our allocation of the allowance for loan losses to the various categories of loans at the dates indicated.

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

$

53,931

$

53,918

$

53,918

$

44,518

$

37,874

Home equity loans and lines of credit

857

999

1,124

1,192

1,288

Five or more units

1,006

1,030

1,049

1,064

1,194

Commercial real estate

266

267

302

304

298

Construction

574

581

454

455

487

Land

1,025

1,016

838

570

251

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

11

14

14

14

16

Consumer

288

318

285

281

296

Not specifically allocated

2,800

2,800

2,800

2,800

2,800


Total for loans held for investment

$

60,758

$

60,943

$

60,784

$

51,198

$

44,504


          The following table indicates our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loan category balance for the various categories of loans at the dates indicated.

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

0.43

%

0.41

%

0.38

%

0.30

%

0.25

%

Home equity loans and lines of credit

0.51

0.53

0.53

0.51

0.51

Five or more units

0.91

0.91

0.90

0.90

0.88

Commercial real estate

1.01

1.00

1.12

1.12

1.03

Construction

0.93

1.10

0.78

0.67

0.62

Land

1.74

1.72

1.41

0.96

0.92

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

0.50

0.58

0.41

0.41

0.46

Consumer

4.69

4.70

4.69

4.46

4.45


Total for loans held for investment

0.47

%

0.45

%

0.41

%

0.33

%

0.28

%


          The following table indicates by loan category the percentage mix of our total loans held for investment at the dates indicated.

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(Dollars in Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Loans secured by real estate:

Residential:

One-to-four units

96.62

%

96.71

%

96.72

%

96.65

%

96.62

%

Home equity loans and lines of credit

1.31

1.37

1.44

1.51

1.60

Five or more units

0.86

0.83

0.79

0.77

0.86

Commercial real estate

0.20

0.20

0.18

0.18

0.18

Construction

0.48

0.39

0.40

0.44

0.50

Land

0.46

0.43

0.41

0.39

0.18

Non-mortgage:

Commercial

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

Consumer

0.05

0.05

0.04

0.04

0.04


Total for loans held for investment

100.00

%

100.00

%

100.00

%

100.00

%

100.00

%


          At March 31, 2007, the recorded investment in loans for which we recognized impairment totaled $12 million, up from $11 million at December 31, 2006 and no loans at March 31, 2006. The allowance for losses related to these loans was less than $1 million at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, with no allowance for losses at March 31, 2006. During the current quarter there was no interest recognized on the impaired loan portfolio.

Page 45
Navigation Links

          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for credit losses associated with impaired loans for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Balance at beginning of period

$

601

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

Provision

56

601

-

-

-

Charge-offs

-

-

-

-

-

Recoveries

-

-

-

-

-


Balance at end of period

$

657

$

601

$

-

$

-

$

-


          The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for real estate and joint ventures held for investment for the quarters indicated.

Three Months Ended


March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

March 31,

(In Thousands)

2007

2006

2006

2006

2006


Balance at beginning of period

$

103

$

103

$

103

$

103

$

103

Provision

-

-

-

-

-

Charge-offs

-

-

-

-

-

Recoveries

-

-

-

-

-


Balance at end of period

$

103

$

103

$

103

$

103

$

103


Capital Resources and Liquidity

          Our sources of funds include deposits, advances from the FHLB and other borrowings; proceeds from the sale of loans, mortgage-backed securities and real estate; payments of loans and mortgage-backed securities and payments for and sales of loan servicing; and income from other investments. Interest rates, real estate sales activity and general economic conditions significantly affect repayments on loans and mortgage-backed securities and deposit inflows and outflows.

          Our primary sources of funds generated in the first quarter of 2007 were from:

          We used these funds to:

          Our principal source of liquidity is our ability to utilize borrowings, as needed. Our primary source of borrowings is the FHLB. At March 31, 2007, our FHLB borrowings totaled $1.3 billion, representing 8.5% of total assets. We currently are approved by the FHLB to borrow up to 50% of total assets to the extent we provide qualifying collateral and hold sufficient FHLB stock. That approved limit would have permitted us, as of quarter end, to borrow an additional $6.3 billion. To the extent deposit growth over the remainder of 2007 falls short of satisfying ongoing commitments to fund maturing and withdrawable deposits, repay maturing borrowings, fund existing and future loans, make investments and continue branch improvement programs, we may utilize the additional capacity from our FHLB borrowing arrangement or other sources. As of March 31, 2007, we had commitments to borrowers for short-term interest rate locks, before the reduction of expected fallout, of $630 million, of which $290 million were related to residential one-to-four unit loans being originated for sale in the secondary market. We also had undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit of $335 million and operating leases of $18 million. We believe our current sources of funds, including repayments of existing loans, enable us to meet our obligations while maintaining liquidity at appropriate levels.

Page 46
Navigation Links

          The holding company currently has adequate liquid assets to meet its obligations and can obtain further funds by means of dividends from subsidiaries, subject to certain limitations, or issuance of further debt or equity. As of March 31, 2007, the Bank had the capacity to declare a dividend totaling $366 million subject to filing an application with the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) at least 30 days prior to the distribution and the OTS approve the dividend. At March 31, 2007, the holding company’s liquid assets, including due from Bank—interest bearing balances, totaled $99 million down from $108 million at the end of 2006.

          Stockholders’ equity totaled $1.4 billion at March 31, 2007, up $46 million from December 31, 2006 and up $195 million from March 31, 2006.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

          Through the normal course of operations, we have entered into contractual obligations and other commitments. Our obligations generally relate to funding of our operations through deposits and borrowings as well as leases for premises and equipment, and our commitments generally relate to our lending operations.

          We have obligations under long-term operating leases, principally for building space and land. Lease terms generally cover a five-year period, with options to extend, and are non-cancelable. Currently, we have no material contractual vendor obligations.

          We executed interest rate swap contracts to change interest rate characteristics of a portion of our FHLB advances to better manage interest rate risk. The contracts have notional amounts totaling $430 million of receive-fixed, pay 3-month LIBOR variable interest and serve as a permitted fair value hedge.

          Our commitments to originate fixed and variable rate mortgage loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Undisbursed loan funds on construction projects and unused lines of credit on home equity and commercial loans include committed funds not disbursed. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.

          Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The credit risk involved in issuing lines and letters of credit requires the same creditworthiness evaluation as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness.

          We receive collateral to support commitments when deemed necessary. The most significant categories of collateral include real estate properties underlying mortgage loans, liens on personal property and cash on deposit with us.

          We enter into derivative financial instruments as part of our interest rate risk management process, including loan forward sale and purchase contracts related to our sale of loans in the secondary market. The associated fair value changes to the notional amount of the derivative instruments are recorded on-balance sheet. The total notional amount of our derivative financial instruments do not represent future cash requirements. For further information, see Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk on page 38 and Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 8.

          We sell all loans without recourse. When a loan sold to an investor without recourse fails to perform according to the contractual terms, the investor will typically review the loan file to determine whether defects in the origination process occurred and whether such defects give rise to a violation of a representation or warranty we made to the investor in connection with the sale. If such a defect is identified, we may required us to either repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor for losses sustained. If there are no such defects, we have no commitment to repurchase the loan. During the first three months of 2007, we recorded a $0.3 million repurchase or indemnification losses related to defects in the origination process and repurchased $9 million of loans. Included in the repurchased loans was $8 million of one-to-four single family residential loans from Fannie Mae, due to the loans being outside Fannie Mae’s underwriting guidelines.

          These loan and servicing sale contracts may also contain provisions to refund sale price premiums to the purchaser if the related loans prepay during a period typically 90 days, but not to exceed 120 days from the sale’s settlement date. We reserved less than $1 million at March 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2006 to cover the estimated loss exposure related to early payoffs. However, if all the loans related to those sales prepaid within the refund period, as of March 31, 2007, our maximum sales price premium refund would be $7.2 million. See Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 8.

Page 47
Navigation Links

          At March 31, 2007, scheduled maturities of obligations and commitments were as follows:

After 1

After 3

Within

Through 3

Through 5

Beyond

Total

(In Thousands)

1 Year

Years

Years

5 Years

Balance


Certificates of deposit

$

8,541,202

$

280,898

$

106,693

$

-

$

8,928,793

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

546,870

-

-

-

546,870

FHLB advances and other borrowings

880,000

418,197

-

-

1,298,197

Senior notes

-

-

-

198,305

198,305

Secondary marketing activities:

Non-qualifying hedge transactions:

Interest rate lock commitments (a)

224,546

-

-

-

224,546

Associated loan forward sale contracts (a)

209,818

-

-

-

209,818

Qualifying cash flow hedge transactions:

Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value

267,862

-

-

-

267,862

Associated loan forward sale contracts (a)

254,260

-

-

-

254,260

Qualifying fair value hedge transactions:

Designated FHLB advances – pay-fixed

-

430,000

-

-

430,000

Associated interest rate swap contracts –

pay-variable, receive-fixed (a)

-

430,000

-

-

430,000

Commitments to originate adjustable rate loans held

for investment

340,849

-

-

-

340,849

Undisbursed loan funds and unused lines of credit

18,514

25,375

4,413

286,501

334,803

Operating leases

5,259

7,901

3,613

760

17,533


(a) Amount represents the notional amount of the commitments or contracts. The notional amount for interest rate lock commitments before the reduction of expected fallout was $290 million.

Regulatory Capital Compliance

          The Bank’s core and tangible capital ratios were both 9.64% and its risk-based capital ratio was 19.57% at March 31, 2007. The Bank’s capital ratios compare favorably with the “well capitalized” standards of 5.00% for core capital and 10.00% for risk-based capital, as defined by regulation.

          The following table is a reconciliation of the Bank’s stockholder’s equity to federal regulatory capital as of March 31, 2007.

Tangible Capital

Core Capital

Risk-Based Capital


(Dollars in Thousands)

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio


Stockholder’s equity

$

1,540,947

$

1,540,947

$

1,540,947

Adjustments:

Deductions:

Investment in real estate subsidiary

(77,314

)

(77,314

)

(77,314

)

Excess cost over fair value of branch acquisitions

(3,150

)

(3,150

)

(3,150

)

Non-permitted mortgage servicing rights

(2,069

)

(2,069

)

(2,069

)

Additions:

Unrealized losses on investment securities

available for sale

1,676

1,676

1,676

Allowance for credit losses, net of specific

allowances (a)

-

-

61,698


Regulatory capital

1,460,090

9.64

%

1,460,090

9.64

%

1,521,788

19.57

%

Well capitalized requirement

227,291

1.50

(b)

757,636

5.00

777,740

10.00

(c)


Excess

$

1,232,799

8.14

%

$

702,454

4.64

%

$

744,048

9.57

%


(a) Limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets.
(b) Represents the minimum requirement for tangible capital, as no “well capitalized” requirement has been established for this category.
(c) A third requirement is Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.00%, which the Bank met and exceeded with a ratio of 18.77%.
Page 48
Navigation Links

ITEM 3. – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

          For information regarding quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk on page 38.

ITEM 4. – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

          As of March 31, 2007, Downey carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of Downey’s management, including Downey’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Downey’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded Downey’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There have been no changes during the most recent fiscal quarter in Downey’s internal controls over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect Downey’s internal controls over financial reporting.

          Disclosure controls and procedures are defined in SEC rules as controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Downey’s disclosure controls and procedures were designed to ensure that material information related to Downey, including subsidiaries, is made known to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a timely manner.

Page 49
Navigation Links

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. – Legal Proceedings

          On October 29, 2004, two former traditional branch employees brought an action in Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC323796, entitled “Margie Holman and Alice A. Mesec, et al. v. Downey Savings and Loan Association.” The complaint seeks unspecified damages for alleged unpaid regular and overtime wages and bonuses, inadequate meal and rest breaks, and related claims. The plaintiffs are seeking class action status to represent all other current and former Downey Savings employees who held the position of Customer Service Supervisor and/or Customer Service Representative at any time during the four years prior to October 29, 2004. Based on a review of the current facts and circumstances with retained outside counsel, (i) Downey Savings plans to oppose the claim and assert all appropriate defenses and (ii) management has provided for what is believed to be a reasonable estimate of exposure for this matter in the event of loss. While acknowledging the uncertainties of litigation, management believes that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on Downey’s operations, cash flows or financial position.

          On June 21, 2005, a former loan underwriting employee brought an action in Contra Costa Superior Court, Case No. C05-01293, entitled "Teresa Sims, et al. v. Downey Savings and Loan Association." The complaint seeks unspecified damages for alleged unpaid overtime wages and bonuses, inadequate meal and rest breaks, and related claims. The plaintiff is seeking class action status to represent all other current and former Downey Savings employees that held the position of loan underwriter, including, but not limited to, the job title of Senior Loan Underwriter within the State of California (a) at any time during the four years prior to June 21, 2005 and/or (b) who was employed by Downey Savings on or about September 30, 2002, when Downey Savings terminated an annual bonus program. Based on a review of the current facts and circumstances with retained outside counsel, (i) Downey Savings plans to oppose the claim and assert all appropriate defenses and (ii) management has provided for what is believed to be a reasonable estimate of exposure for this matter in the event of loss. While acknowledging the uncertainties of litigation, management believes that the ultimate outcome of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on Downey’s operations, cash flows or financial position.

          Downey has been named as a defendant in other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, will have a material adverse effect on its operations, cash flows or financial position.

ITEM 1A. – Risk Factors

          There have been no other material changes in our risk factors since December 31, 2006, except that the IRS may assert a $9.2 million penalty (including penalty interest) against Downey related to its 2004 tax return. Downey has determined it is unlikely any such penalty would be sustained and it would vigorously contest any penalty that would be proposed. See Note (4) – Income Taxes on page 12 and Note (9) – Adjustment of Prior and Beginning Period Amounts on page 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 2. – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

          None.

ITEM 3. – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

          None.

ITEM 4. – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

          None

ITEM 5. – Other Information

          None.

Page 50
Navigation Links

ITEM 6. – Exhibits

Exhibit

Number

Description


31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


 

AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS

          Corporate governance guidelines, charters for the audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees of the Board of Directors and codes of business conduct and ethics are available free of charge from our internet site, www.downeysavings.com by clicking on “Investor Relations” on our home page and proceeding to “Corporate Governance.” Annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are posted on our internet site as soon as reasonably practical after we file them with the SEC and available free of charge under “Corporate Filings” on our “Investor Relations” page.

          We will furnish any or all of the non-confidential exhibits upon payment of a reasonable fee. Please send request for exhibits and/or fee information to:

 

Downey Financial Corp.
3501 Jamboree Road
Newport Beach, California 92660
Attention: Corporate Secretary

 

SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

DOWNEY FINANCIAL CORP.

/s/ Daniel D. Rosenthal


Date: May 4, 2007

Daniel D. Rosenthal

President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Brian E. Côté


Date: May 4, 2007

Brian E. Côté

Chief Financial Officer


Page 51
Navigation Links

 

NAVIGATION   LINKS

FORM 10-Q COVER

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ITEM 2. – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 3. – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 4. – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. – Legal Proceedings

ITEM 1A. – Risk Factors

ITEM 2. – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

ITEM 3. – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

ITEM 4. – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

ITEM 5. – Other Information

ITEM 6. – Exhibits

AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS

SIGNATURES