e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended August 1, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______________ to ________________
Commission File No. 1-7819
Analog Devices, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
04-2348234 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One Technology Way, Norwood, MA
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
02062-9106
(Zip Code) |
(781) 329-4700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on it
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act) YES o NO þ
As of August 1, 2009 there were 291,549,108 shares of Common Stock, $0.16 2/3 par value per
share, outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
491,991 |
|
|
$ |
658,986 |
|
Cost of sales (1) |
|
|
225,762 |
|
|
|
257,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
266,229 |
|
|
|
401,794 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development (1) |
|
|
107,578 |
|
|
|
135,837 |
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative (1) |
|
|
79,706 |
|
|
|
104,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,284 |
|
|
|
240,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
78,945 |
|
|
|
161,190 |
|
Nonoperating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(2,558 |
) |
|
|
(8,205 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,082 |
) |
|
|
(7,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
80,027 |
|
|
|
168,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
14,567 |
|
|
|
39,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
|
65,460 |
|
|
|
129,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,611 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
65,460 |
|
|
$ |
138,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings per share basic |
|
|
291,387 |
|
|
|
290,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings per share diluted |
|
|
293,084 |
|
|
|
295,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid per share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
1,942 |
|
|
$ |
1,943 |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
5,508 |
|
|
$ |
6,178 |
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative |
|
$ |
4,565 |
|
|
$ |
5,452 |
|
See accompanying notes.
1
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,443,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,922,235 |
|
Cost of sales (1) |
|
|
646,525 |
|
|
|
748,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
796,783 |
|
|
|
1,173,618 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development (1) |
|
|
336,854 |
|
|
|
400,029 |
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative (1) |
|
|
249,828 |
|
|
|
309,301 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
53,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,338 |
|
|
|
709,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
156,445 |
|
|
|
464,288 |
|
Nonoperating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(13,881 |
) |
|
|
(31,400 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,773 |
) |
|
|
(30,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
170,218 |
|
|
|
494,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
28,419 |
|
|
|
113,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
|
141,799 |
|
|
|
380,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
10,693 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
261,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
142,163 |
|
|
$ |
642,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings per share basic |
|
|
291,267 |
|
|
|
293,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings per share diluted |
|
|
292,259 |
|
|
|
298,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid per share |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
5,334 |
|
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
16,880 |
|
|
$ |
17,810 |
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative |
|
$ |
13,778 |
|
|
$ |
15,580 |
|
See accompanying notes.
2
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
632,715 |
|
|
$ |
593,599 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,091,729 |
|
|
|
716,087 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
244,025 |
|
|
|
315,290 |
|
Inventory (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
|
14,251 |
|
|
|
15,350 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
192,292 |
|
|
|
200,436 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
69,529 |
|
|
|
98,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,072 |
|
|
|
314,629 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
76,683 |
|
|
|
102,676 |
|
Deferred compensation plan investments |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
37,127 |
|
|
|
40,460 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,359,633 |
|
|
|
2,089,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
394,200 |
|
|
|
378,187 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
1,501,942 |
|
|
|
1,512,984 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
58,924 |
|
|
|
63,071 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
66,452 |
|
|
|
65,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,021,518 |
|
|
|
2,019,489 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,529,954 |
|
|
|
1,452,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
491,564 |
|
|
|
567,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan investments |
|
|
7,078 |
|
|
|
31,099 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
247,347 |
|
|
|
235,175 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
71,249 |
|
|
|
65,949 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
30,750 |
|
|
|
26,461 |
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
62,037 |
|
|
|
62,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
428,954 |
|
|
|
433,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,280,151 |
|
|
$ |
3,090,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $2,503 and $2,632 related to stock-based compensation at August 1, 2009 and November
1, 2008, respectively. |
See accompanying notes.
3
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
94,787 |
|
|
$ |
130,451 |
|
Deferred income on shipments to distributors, net |
|
|
123,876 |
|
|
|
175,358 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
13,951 |
|
|
|
52,546 |
|
Deferred compensation plan liability |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
118,830 |
|
|
|
191,307 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
18,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
353,926 |
|
|
|
569,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
374,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
20,827 |
|
|
|
14,310 |
|
Deferred compensation plan liability |
|
|
7,076 |
|
|
|
31,800 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
65,031 |
|
|
|
55,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
467,860 |
|
|
|
101,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 471,934 shares authorized,
none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.16 2/3 par value, 1,200,000,000 shares
authorized, 291,549,108 shares issued and outstanding
(291,193,451 on November 1, 2008) |
|
|
48,592 |
|
|
|
48,533 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,426,580 |
|
|
|
2,419,908 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(16,807 |
) |
|
|
(48,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,458,365 |
|
|
|
2,420,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,280,151 |
|
|
$ |
3,090,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
142,163 |
|
|
$ |
642,413 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
102,495 |
|
|
|
108,061 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
5,227 |
|
|
|
7,476 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
35,992 |
|
|
|
36,895 |
|
Gain on sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250,785 |
) |
Income tax payments related to gain on sale of businesses |
|
|
(4,105 |
) |
|
|
(67,283 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(7,660 |
) |
Excess tax benefit-stock options |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(12,967 |
) |
Non-cash portion of special charge |
|
|
13,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash activity |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(27,143 |
) |
|
|
69,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
127,307 |
|
|
|
(115,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
269,470 |
|
|
|
527,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(1,914,428 |
) |
|
|
(1,551,019 |
) |
Maturities of short-term available-for-sale investments |
|
|
1,535,941 |
|
|
|
1,348,947 |
|
Net (expenditures) proceeds from sales of businesses (See Note 15) |
|
|
(1,340 |
) |
|
|
403,181 |
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(39,706 |
) |
|
|
(110,031 |
) |
Payments for acquisitions |
|
|
(8,360 |
) |
|
|
(3,146 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(5,750 |
) |
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(433,643 |
) |
|
|
89,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
370,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payments to shareholders |
|
|
(174,662 |
) |
|
|
(164,425 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(3,762 |
) |
|
|
(552,380 |
) |
Increase in liability from common stock repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
Net proceeds from employee stock plans |
|
|
8,740 |
|
|
|
83,005 |
|
Excess tax benefit-stock options |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
12,967 |
|
Credit facility fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) for financing activities |
|
|
200,671 |
|
|
|
(621,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
2,618 |
|
|
|
(1,796 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
39,116 |
|
|
|
(6,516 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
593,599 |
|
|
|
424,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
632,715 |
|
|
$ |
418,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 1, 2009
(all tabular amounts in thousands except per share amounts and percentages)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the information furnished in the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements reflects all normal recurring adjustments that are necessary to fairly state
the results for these interim periods and should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 1, 2008 and related notes. The results of
operations for the interim period shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009 or any future period.
The Company sold its baseband chipset business and related support operations (Baseband Chipset
Business) to MediaTek Inc. and sold its CPU voltage regulation and PC thermal monitoring business
to certain subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
The Company has reflected the financial results of these businesses as discontinued operations in
the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of
these businesses are reflected as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the
consolidated balance sheets as of August 1, 2009 and November 1, 2008.
The Company has a 52-53 week fiscal year that ends on the Saturday closest to the last day in
October. Fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 are 52-week fiscal years. Certain amounts reported in
previous years have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2009 presentation. Such reclassified
amounts were immaterial.
Note 2 Revenue Recognition
Revenue from sales to customers is generally recognized when title passes, which for shipments to
certain foreign countries is subsequent to product shipment. Title for these shipments ordinarily
passes within a week of shipment. A reserve for sales returns and allowances for customers is
recorded based on historical experience or specific identification of an event necessitating a
reserve.
In all regions of the world, the Company defers revenue and the related cost of sales on shipments
to distributors until the distributors resell the products to their customers. Therefore, the
Companys revenue fully reflects end customer purchases and is not impacted by distributor
inventory levels. Sales to distributors are made under agreements that allow distributors to
receive price adjustment credits, as discussed below, and to return qualifying products for credit,
as determined by the Company, in order to reduce the amounts of slow-moving, discontinued or
obsolete product from their inventory. These agreements limit such returns to a certain percentage
of the value of the Companys shipments to that distributor during the prior quarter. In addition,
distributors are allowed to return unsold products if the Company terminates the relationship with
the distributor.
Distributors are granted price adjustment credits related to many of their sales to their
customers. Price adjustment credits are granted when the distributors standard cost (i.e., the
Companys sales price to the distributor) does not provide the distributor with an appropriate
margin on its sales to its customers. As distributors negotiate selling prices with their
customers, the final sales price agreed to with the customer will be influenced by many factors,
including the particular product being sold, the quantity ordered, the particular customer, the
geographic location of the distributor, and the competitive landscape. As a result, the
distributor may request and receive a price adjustment credit from the Company to allow the
distributor to earn an appropriate margin on the transaction.
Distributors are also granted price adjustment credits in the event of a price decrease subsequent
to the date the product was shipped and billed to the distributor. Generally, the Company will
provide a credit equal to the difference between the price paid by the distributor (less any prior
credits on such products) and the new price for the product multiplied by the quantity of such
product in the distributors inventory at the time of the price decrease.
Given the uncertainties associated with the levels of price adjustment credits to be granted to
distributors, the sales price to the distributor is not fixed or determinable until the distributor
resells the products to their customers. Therefore, the Company defers revenue recognition from
sales to distributors until the distributors have sold the products to their customers.
6
Title to the inventory transfers to the distributor at the time of shipment or delivery to the
distributor, and payment from the distributor is due in accordance with the Companys standard
payment terms. These payment terms are not contingent upon the
distributors sale of the products to their customers. Upon title transfer to distributors,
inventory is reduced for the cost of goods shipped, the margin (sales less cost of sales) is
recorded as deferred income on shipments to distributors, net and an account receivable is
recorded.
The deferred costs of sales to distributors have historically had very little risk of impairment
due to the margins the Company earns on sales of its products and the relatively long life-cycle of
the Companys products. Product returns from distributors that are ultimately scrapped have
historically been immaterial. In addition, price protection and price adjustment credits granted
to distributors historically have not exceeded the margins the Company earns on sales of its
products. The Company continuously monitors the level and nature of product returns and is in
frequent contact with the distributors to ensure reserves are established for all known material
issues.
As of August 1, 2009 and November 1, 2008, the Company had gross deferred revenue of $204.1 million
and $279.3 million, respectively, and gross deferred cost of sales of $80.2 million and $103.9
million, respectively. Deferred income on shipments to distributors as of August 1, 2009 was lower
than the amount as of November 1, 2008 by $51.5 million, as a result of the distributors sales to
their customers in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 exceeding the Companys shipments to its
distributors during this same time period.
Shipping costs are charged to cost of sales as incurred.
The Company generally offers a 12-month warranty for its products. The Companys warranty policy
provides for replacement of the defective product. Specific accruals are recorded for known product
warranty issues. Product warranty expenses during both of the three- and nine-month periods ended
August 1, 2009 and August 2, 2008 were not material.
Note 3 Stock-Based Compensation
Grant-Date Fair Value The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the
grant-date fair value of an award. Information pertaining to the Companys stock option awards and
the related estimated weighted-average assumptions to calculate the fair value of stock options
granted during the three- and nine-month periods ended August 1, 2009 and August 2, 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
Stock Options |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Options granted (in thousands) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
5,650 |
|
|
|
5,733 |
|
Weighted-average exercise price per share |
|
$ |
22.96 |
|
|
$ |
31.96 |
|
|
$ |
19.60 |
|
|
$ |
29.89 |
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share |
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
9.07 |
|
|
$ |
7.42 |
|
|
$ |
7.91 |
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected volatility |
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
|
58.9 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
Weighted-average expected term (in years) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Expected volatility The Company is responsible for estimating volatility and has considered a
number of factors, including third-party estimates, when estimating volatility. The Company
currently believes that the exclusive use of implied volatility results in the best estimate of the
grant-date fair value of employee stock options because it reflects the markets current
expectations of future volatility. In evaluating the appropriateness of exclusively relying on
implied volatility, the Company concluded that: (1) options in the Companys common stock are
actively traded with sufficient volume on several exchanges; (2) the market prices of both the
traded options and the underlying shares are measured at a similar point in time to each other and
on a date close to the grant date of the employee share options; (3) the traded options have
exercise prices that are both near-the-money and close to the exercise price of the employee share
options; and (4) the maturities of the traded options used to estimate volatility are at least one
year.
Expected term The Company uses historical employee exercise and option expiration data to
estimate the expected term assumption for the Black-Scholes grant-date valuation. The Company
believes that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of a new
option, and that generally its employees exhibit similar exercise behavior.
7
Risk-free interest rate The yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that is
commensurate with the expected term assumption is used as the risk-free interest rate.
Expected dividend yield Expected dividend yield is calculated by annualizing the cash dividend
declared by the Companys Board of Directors for the current quarter and dividing that result by
the closing stock price on the date of grant. Until such time as the Companys Board of Directors
declares a cash dividend for an amount that is different from the current quarters cash dividend,
the current dividend will be used in deriving this assumption. Cash dividends are not paid on
options, restricted stock or restricted stock units.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the value of
the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R), requires forfeitures to
be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. The term forfeitures is distinct from cancellations or
expirations and represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered stock-based award. Based
on an analysis of its historical forfeitures, the Company has applied an annual forfeiture rate of
4.3% to all unvested stock-based awards as of August 1, 2009. The rate of 4.3% represents the
portion that is expected to be forfeited each year over the vesting period. This analysis will be
re-evaluated quarterly and the forfeiture rate will be adjusted as necessary. Ultimately, the
actual expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those shares that vest.
Stock-Based Compensation Activity
A summary of the activity under the Companys stock option plans as of August 1, 2009 and changes
during the three- and nine-month periods then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted- |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Average Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
Activity during the Three Months Ended August 1, 2009 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Price Per Share |
|
Term in Years |
|
Value |
|
Options outstanding at May 2, 2009 |
|
|
72,832 |
|
|
$ |
35.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
35 |
|
|
$ |
22.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
$ |
19.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
31.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
$ |
39.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at August 1, 2009 |
|
|
71,908 |
|
|
$ |
35.34 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
88,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at August 1, 2009 |
|
|
53,249 |
|
|
$ |
37.30 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
45,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested or expected to vest at August 1, 2009 (1) |
|
|
70,666 |
|
|
$ |
35.49 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
84,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to the vested options, the Company expects a portion of the unvested
options to vest at some point in the future. Options expected to vest is calculated by
applying an estimated forfeiture rate to the unvested options. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price Per |
Activity during the Nine Months Ended August 1, 2009 |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Share |
|
Options outstanding at November 1, 2008 |
|
|
70,340 |
|
|
$ |
36.63 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
5,650 |
|
|
$ |
19.60 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
$ |
18.15 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
$ |
33.52 |
|
Options expired |
|
|
(2,762 |
) |
|
$ |
39.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at August 1, 2009 |
|
|
71,908 |
|
|
$ |
35.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three and nine months ended August 1, 2009, the total intrinsic value of options
exercised (i.e., the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the
employee to exercise the options) was $1.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively, and the total
amount of proceeds received from exercise of these options was $5.8 million and $8.8 million,
respectively. Proceeds from stock option exercises pursuant to employee stock plans in the
Companys statement of cash flows during the nine months ended August 1, 2009 of $8.7 million, is
net of the value of shares surrendered by employees to satisfy employee tax obligations upon
vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units and in connection with
8
the exercise of stock
options granted to the Companys employees under the Companys equity compensation plans. The
withholding amount is based on the Companys minimum statutory withholding requirement pursuant to
SFAS 123R. The total grant-date fair value of stock options that vested during the three and nine
months ended August 1, 2009 was approximately $0.7 million and $72.8 million, respectively.
During the three and nine months ended August 2, 2008, the total intrinsic value of options
exercised (i.e., the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the
employee to exercise the options) was $18.0 million and $94.5 million, respectively, and the total
amount of cash received from exercise of these options was $20.9 million and $89.4 million,
respectively. Proceeds from stock option exercises pursuant to employee stock plans in the
Companys statement of cash flows during the nine months ended August 2, 2008 of $83.0 million, is
net of the value of shares surrendered by employees to satisfy employee tax obligations upon
vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units and in connection with the exercise of stock
options granted to the Companys employees under the Companys equity compensation plans. The
total grant-date fair value of stock options that vested during the three and nine months ended
August 2, 2008 was approximately $0.9 million and $76.6 million, respectively.
A summary of the Companys restricted stock and restricted stock unit award activity as of August
1, 2009 and changes during the three- and nine-month periods then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Shares and/ or |
|
Average Grant |
|
|
Units |
|
Date Fair Value |
Activity during the Three Months Ended August 1, 2009 |
|
Outstanding |
|
Per Share |
|
Non-vested shares outstanding at May 2, 2009 |
|
|
146 |
|
|
$ |
25.02 |
|
Restrictions lapsed |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
33.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares outstanding at August 1, 2009 |
|
|
143 |
|
|
$ |
24.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
Shares and/ or |
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Units |
|
Average Grant |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Date Fair Value |
Activity during the Nine Months Ended August 1, 2009 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Per Share |
|
Non-vested shares outstanding at November 1, 2008 |
|
|
92 |
|
|
$ |
31.80 |
|
Awards and/or units granted |
|
|
73 |
|
|
$ |
19.44 |
|
Restrictions lapsed |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
35.85 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
36.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares outstanding at August 1, 2009 |
|
|
143 |
|
|
$ |
24.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of August 1, 2009, there was $116.9 million (before tax consideration) of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards, including stock options, restricted stock
and restricted stock units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 1.7 years.
9
Note 4 Comprehensive Income
Components of comprehensive income include net income and certain transactions that have generally
been reported in the consolidated statement of shareholders equity and consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
65,460 |
|
|
$ |
129,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
5,629 |
|
|
|
(2,796 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized holding losses (net of taxes of $2 and
$76, respectively) on securities classified as short-term investments |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) (net of taxes of $211
and $640, respectively) on securities classified as other investments |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) (net of taxes of $1,336 and $298,
respectively) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges |
|
|
8,013 |
|
|
|
(1,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition (obligation) asset |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Net actuarial (loss) gain |
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
13,359 |
|
|
|
(5,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from continuing operations |
|
|
78,819 |
|
|
|
123,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
78,819 |
|
|
$ |
133,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
141,799 |
|
|
$ |
380,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
9,803 |
|
|
|
(9,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized holding (losses) gains (net of taxes of $352 and
$124, respectively) on securities classified as short-term investments |
|
|
(2,493 |
) |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized holding gains (net of taxes of $265
and $336, respectively) on securities classified as other investments |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) (net of taxes of $3,837 and $695,
respectively) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges |
|
|
25,140 |
|
|
|
(4,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transition (obligation) asset |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Net actuarial (loss) gain |
|
|
(1,544 |
) |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
31,371 |
|
|
|
(11,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from continuing operations |
|
|
173,170 |
|
|
|
369,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
261,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
173,534 |
|
|
$ |
630,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income at August 1, 2009 and November 1, 2008
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
(12,513 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,316 |
) |
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities(1) |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
(538 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments |
|
|
4,877 |
|
|
|
(20,263 |
) |
Pension plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Transition obligation |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Net actuarial loss |
|
|
(9,569 |
) |
|
|
(8,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(16,807 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value of investments with unrealized losses as of August 1, 2009 and November
1, 2008 was $1,225 million and $0.1 million, respectively. |
Note 5 Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed based only on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of potential future
issuances of common stock relating to stock option programs and other potentially dilutive
securities using the treasury stock method. In calculating diluted earnings per share, the dilutive
effect of stock options is computed using the average market price for the respective period. In
addition, under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), the assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method include the
average unrecognized compensation expense of stock options that are in-the-money. This results in
the assumed buyback of additional shares, thereby reducing the dilutive impact of stock options.
Potential future issuances of common stock related to certain of the Companys outstanding stock
options were excluded because they were anti-dilutive. Those potential future issuances of common
stock, determined based on the weighted-average exercise prices during the respective periods,
could be dilutive in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
65,460 |
|
|
$ |
129,195 |
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
65,460 |
|
|
$ |
138,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
291,387 |
|
|
|
290,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
291,387 |
|
|
|
290,376 |
|
Assumed exercise of common stock equivalents |
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
4,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares |
|
|
293,084 |
|
|
|
295,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents related to
outstanding stock options |
|
|
60,279 |
|
|
|
51,271 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The sum of the individual per share amounts may not equal the total due to rounding. |
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
141,799 |
|
|
$ |
380,935 |
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
261,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
142,163 |
|
|
$ |
642,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
291,267 |
|
|
|
293,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
291,267 |
|
|
|
293,302 |
|
Assumed exercise of common stock equivalents |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares |
|
|
292,259 |
|
|
|
298,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents related to outstanding stock options |
|
|
63,967 |
|
|
|
55,261 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The sum of the individual per share amounts may not equal the total due to rounding. |
12
Note 6 Special Charges
A summary of the Companys special charges is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization |
|
|
Consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of Wafer |
|
|
of Product |
|
|
of a Wafer |
|
|
Reduction of |
|
|
Reduction |
|
|
Wafer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication |
|
|
Development |
|
|
Fabrication |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
of |
|
|
Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
|
and |
|
|
Facility in |
|
|
Infrastructure |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Facility |
|
|
Total Special |
|
Income Statement |
|
in Sunnyvale |
|
|
Support Programs |
|
|
Limerick |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
in Cambridge |
|
|
Charges |
|
Fiscal 2005 Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
$ |
20,315 |
|
|
$ |
11,165 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2005 Charges |
|
$ |
20,315 |
|
|
$ |
11,165 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility closure costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554 |
|
Abandonment of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459 |
|
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
Change in estimate |
|
|
(2,029 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,029 |
) |
Workforce reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2006 Charges |
|
$ |
(2,029 |
) |
|
$ |
3,819 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007 Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility closure costs |
|
|
10,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,288 |
|
Workforce reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
13,748 |
|
|
|
10,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,624 |
|
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
Change in estimate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2007 Charges |
|
$ |
10,288 |
|
|
$ |
4,111 |
|
|
$ |
13,748 |
|
|
$ |
12,348 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
Change in estimate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2008 Charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,627 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,583 |
|
|
|
9,203 |
|
|
|
35,786 |
|
Facility closure costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
Non-cash impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
12,929 |
|
|
|
13,768 |
|
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2009 Charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,333 |
|
|
$ |
22,132 |
|
|
$ |
53,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization |
|
|
Consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wafer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Product |
|
|
of a Wafer |
|
|
Reduction of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of Wafer |
|
|
Development and |
|
|
Fabrication |
|
|
Overhead |
|
|
Reduction of |
|
|
Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Facility |
|
|
Support |
|
|
Facility in |
|
|
Infrastructure |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
in |
|
|
Total Special |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
in Sunnyvale |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Limerick |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Cambridge |
|
|
Charges |
|
Balance at November 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
|
$ |
11,754 |
|
|
$ |
1,764 |
|
|
$ |
1,501 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,055 |
|
|
|
22,132 |
|
|
|
41,737 |
|
Severance payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(9,916 |
) |
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
|
(6,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,642 |
) |
Facility closure costs |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
Non-cash impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(764 |
) |
|
|
(12,929 |
) |
|
|
(13,693 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency on
accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
2,162 |
|
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
|
$ |
12,783 |
|
|
$ |
9,203 |
|
|
$ |
27,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,919 |
|
Severance payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
(6,144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,527 |
) |
Facility closure costs |
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(904 |
) |
Non-cash impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency on
accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 2, 2009 |
|
$ |
941 |
|
|
$ |
1,103 |
|
|
$ |
1,736 |
|
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
$ |
17,171 |
|
|
$ |
9,203 |
|
|
$ |
30,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(1,193 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(5,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,274 |
) |
Facility closure costs |
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,047 |
) |
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency on
accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
918 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
10,843 |
|
|
$ |
9,203 |
|
|
$ |
22,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of Wafer Fabrication Facility in Sunnyvale
The Company ceased production at its California wafer fabrication facility in November 2006. The
Company is paying the lease obligation costs on a monthly basis over the remaining lease term,
which expires in 2010. The Company completed the clean-up activity during fiscal 2007, and does
not expect to incur any additional charges related to this action.
Reorganization of Product Development and Support Programs
The Company recorded special charges in fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007 as a result of its
decision to reorganize its product development and support programs with the goal of providing
greater focus on its analog and digital signal processing product programs. The Company terminated
the employment of all employees associated with these programs and is paying amounts owed to
employees for severance as income continuance. The Company does not expect to incur any further
charges related to this reorganization action.
Consolidation of a Wafer Fabrication Facility in Limerick
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company recorded a special charge of $13.7 million as
a result of its decision to only use eight-inch technology at its wafer fabrication facility in
Limerick. Certain manufacturing processes and products produced on the Limerick facilitys six-inch
production line have transitioned to the Companys existing eight-inch production line in Limerick
while others have transitioned to external foundries. The charge was for severance and fringe
benefit costs recorded pursuant to SFAS 88, Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments
of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, or SFAS 88, under the Companys
ongoing benefit plan for 150 manufacturing employees associated with this action. As of August 1,
2009, the Company still employed 4 of the 150 employees included in this action. Most of
14
the
production in the six-inch wafer fabrication facility has ceased and the remaining production is
expected to cease during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, at which time the employment of the remaining affected employees
will be terminated. These employees must continue to be employed by the Company until their
employment is involuntarily terminated in order to receive the severance benefit. During the
fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recorded an additional charge of $1.5 million related to this
action, of which $1.2 million was an adjustment to the original estimate of the severance costs and
$0.3 million was for clean-up and closure costs that were expensed as incurred. During the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company recorded an additional charge of $0.6 million for clean-up and
closure costs that were expensed as incurred. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the
Company recorded an additional charge of $0.6 million for clean-up and closure costs that were
expensed as incurred. The Company does not expect to incur any further charges related to this
action.
Reduction of Overhead Infrastructure Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company recorded a special charge as a result of its
decision to either deemphasize or exit certain businesses or products and focus investments in
products and end markets where it has better opportunities for profitable growth. In September
2007, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its Baseband Chipset Business. As a
result, the Company decided to reduce the support infrastructure in manufacturing, engineering and
SMG&A to more appropriately reflect its required overhead structure. The Company terminated the
employment of all employees associated with these programs and is paying amounts owed to employees
for severance as income continuance. The Company does not expect to incur any further charges
related to this action.
Reduction of Operating Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, in order to further reduce its operating cost structure,
the Company recorded a special charge of $1.6 million for severance and fringe benefit costs
recorded pursuant to SFAS 88 under its ongoing benefit plan or statutory requirements at foreign
locations, for 19 engineering and SMG&A employees. The Company terminated the employment of all
employees associated with this charge and is paying amounts owed to employees for severance as
income continuance.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company recorded an additional charge of $19.1 million
related to this cost reduction action. Approximately $2.1 million of this charge was for lease
obligation costs for facilities that the Company ceased using during the first quarter of fiscal
2009; approximately $0.8 million was for the write-off of property, plant and equipment; and
approximately $0.6 million was for contract termination costs and for clean-up and closure costs
that were expensed as incurred. The remaining $15.6 million related to the severance and fringe
benefit costs recorded pursuant to SFAS 88 under the Companys ongoing benefit plan or statutory
requirements at foreign locations, for 221 manufacturing employees and 149 engineering and selling,
marketing, general and administrative employees. As of August 1, 2009, the Company still employed
3 of the 370 employees included in this cost reduction action. These employees must continue to be
employed by the Company until their employment is involuntarily terminated in order to receive the
severance benefit.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company recorded an additional charge of $11.3
million related to this cost reduction action. Approximately $0.1 million was for the write-off
of property, plant and equipment; and approximately $0.3 million was for clean-up and closure costs
that were expensed as incurred. The remaining $10.9 million related to the severance and fringe
benefit costs recorded pursuant to SFAS 88 under the Companys ongoing benefit plan or statutory
requirements at foreign locations, for 24 manufacturing employees and 153 engineering and selling,
marketing, general and administrative employees. As of August 1, 2009, the Company still employed
26 of the 177 employees included in this cost reduction action. These employees must continue to be
employed by the Company until their employment is involuntarily terminated in order to receive the
severance benefit.
Closure of a Wafer Fabrication Facility in Cambridge
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company recorded a special charge of $22.1 million as
a result of its decision to consolidate its Cambridge, Massachusetts wafer fabrication facility
into its existing Wilmington, Massachusetts facility. In connection with the anticipated closure
of this facility, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the facilities manufacturing assets
and concluded that there was an impairment of approximately $12.9 million based on the revised
period of intended use. The remaining $9.2 million was for severance and fringe benefit costs
recorded pursuant to SFAS 88 under the Companys ongoing benefit plan for 175 manufacturing
employees and 9 selling, marketing, general and administrative employees associated with this
action. As of August 1, 2009, the Company still employed all of the employees included in this
action. The Company expects production to cease in the Cambridge fabrication facility during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, at which time the employment of the affected employees will be
terminated. These employees must continue to be employed by the Company until their employment is
involuntarily terminated in order to receive the severance benefit.
15
Note 7 Segment Information
The Company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment. The Company designs,
develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of integrated circuits. The Chief Executive
Officer has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker as defined by SFAS 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.
Revenue Trends by End Market
The following table summarizes revenue by end market. The categorization of revenue by end market
is determined using a variety of data points including the technical characteristics of the
product, the sold to customer information, the ship to customer information and the end
customer product or application into which the Companys product will be incorporated. As data
systems for capturing and tracking this data evolve and improve, the categorization of products by
end market can vary over time. When this occurs, the Company reclassifies revenue by end market for
prior periods. Such reclassifications typically do not materially change the sizing of, or the
underlying trends of results within, each end market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Industrial |
|
$ |
252,135 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
|
$ |
356,280 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
125,500 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
|
147,894 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
102,323 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
|
|
129,784 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Computer |
|
|
12,033 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(52 |
)% |
|
|
25,028 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
491,991 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
$ |
658,986 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Industrial |
|
$ |
753,271 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
(28 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,043,899 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
391,399 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
427,143 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
258,350 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
|
380,291 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Computer |
|
|
40,288 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(43 |
)% |
|
|
70,902 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,443,308 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,922,235 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Trends by Product Type
The following table summarizes revenue by product categories. The categorization of the Companys
products into broad categories is based on the characteristics of the individual products, the
specification of the products and in some cases the specific uses that certain products have within
applications. The categorization of products into categories is therefore subject to judgment in
some cases and can vary over time. In instances where products move between product categories the
Company reclassifies the amounts in the product categories for all prior periods. Such
reclassifications typically do not materially change the sizing of, or the underlying trends of
results within, each product category.
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Converters |
|
$ |
239,100 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
$ |
302,812 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Amplifiers |
|
|
119,897 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
(30 |
%) |
|
|
170,526 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Other analog |
|
|
65,211 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
(19 |
%) |
|
|
80,352 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal analog signal processing |
|
|
424,208 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
553,690 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
Power management & reference |
|
|
27,986 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(24 |
%) |
|
|
36,674 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total analog products |
|
$ |
452,194 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
$ |
590,364 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General purpose DSP |
|
|
38,923 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(36 |
%) |
|
|
60,521 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Other DSP |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(89 |
%) |
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total digital signal processing |
|
$ |
39,797 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(42 |
%) |
|
$ |
68,622 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
491,991 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
%) |
|
$ |
658,986 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue* |
|
Converters |
|
$ |
694,856 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
$ |
881,354 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Amplifiers |
|
|
373,646 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
%) |
|
|
496,992 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Other analog |
|
|
170,304 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(30 |
%) |
|
|
243,012 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal analog signal processing |
|
|
1,238,806 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
(24 |
%) |
|
|
1,621,358 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
Power management & reference |
|
|
82,316 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
|
104,789 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total analog products |
|
$ |
1,321,122 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
$ |
1,726,147 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General purpose DSP |
|
|
117,249 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(33 |
%) |
|
|
173,921 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Other DSP |
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(78 |
%) |
|
|
22,167 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total digital signal processing |
|
$ |
122,186 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(38 |
%) |
|
$ |
196,088 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,443,308 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
%) |
|
$ |
1,922,235 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The sum of the individual percentages may not equal the total due to rounding. |
Revenue Trends by Geographic Region
Revenue by geographic region, based upon customer location, for the three- and nine-month periods
ended August 1, 2009 and August 2, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Region |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
94,326 |
|
|
$ |
131,168 |
|
|
$ |
298,713 |
|
|
$ |
393,921 |
|
Rest of North and
South America |
|
|
23,961 |
|
|
|
25,433 |
|
|
|
63,714 |
|
|
|
70,578 |
|
Europe |
|
|
120,899 |
|
|
|
177,881 |
|
|
|
369,499 |
|
|
|
509,347 |
|
Japan |
|
|
91,480 |
|
|
|
128,457 |
|
|
|
235,749 |
|
|
|
380,940 |
|
China |
|
|
85,317 |
|
|
|
103,632 |
|
|
|
274,374 |
|
|
|
284,358 |
|
Rest of Asia |
|
|
76,008 |
|
|
|
92,415 |
|
|
|
201,259 |
|
|
|
283,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
491,991 |
|
|
$ |
658,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,443,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,922,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the three- and nine-month periods ended August 1, 2009 the predominant countries comprising
Rest of North and South America are Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising
Europe are Germany and Sweden; and the predominant countries comprising Rest of Asia are Taiwan
and Korea.
17
In the three- and nine-month periods ended August 2, 2008 the predominant countries comprising
Rest of North and South America are Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising
Europe are Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy; and the predominant countries
comprising Rest of Asia are Taiwan and Korea.
Note 8 Fair Value
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), at the beginning of fiscal year 2009. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for non-financial assets
and liabilities in financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008,
which is the Companys fiscal year 2010. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not impact the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 establishes a three
level hierarchy to prioritize the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The
hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level
3 measurements).
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are described below:
Level 1 Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability
has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full
term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability in which there is
little, if any market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. As of August 1,
2009, the Company held no Level 3 assets or liabilities.
The table below sets forth by level the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were
accounted for at fair value as of August 1, 2009. The table does not include cash on hand and also
does not include assets and liabilities that are measured at historical cost or any basis other
than fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value measurement at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Date using: |
|
|
|
Portion of |
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional money market funds |
|
$ |
593,878 |
|
|
$ |
593,878 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro time deposits |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622 |
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate obligations |
|
|
1,091,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,091,729 |
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,488 |
|
Deferred compensation investments |
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
1,697,754 |
|
|
$ |
603,915 |
|
|
$ |
1,093,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
374,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
374,926 |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
|
5,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
380,605 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
380,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value
disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash equivalents and short-term investments These investments are adjusted to fair value
based on quoted market prices or are determined using a yield curve model based on current market
rates.
Deferred compensation plan investments and other investments The fair value of these
investments is based on quoted market prices.
Long-term debt The fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted market values.
Interest rate swap agreements The fair value of interest rate swap agreements is based on
quotes received from third party banks. These values represent the estimated amount the Company
would receive or pay to terminate the agreements taking into consideration current interest rates
as well as the creditworthiness of the counterparty.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts The estimated fair value of forward foreign
currency exchange contracts, which includes derivatives that are accounted for as cash flow hedges
and those that are not designated as cash flow hedges, is based on the estimated amount the Company
would receive to sell these agreements at the reporting date taking into consideration current
interest rates as well as the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets and our
creditworthiness for liabilities.
Note 9 Derivatives
Foreign Exchange Exposure Management The Company enters into forward foreign currency exchange
contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. Such exposures result from the portion of the Companys
operations, assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar,
primarily the Euro; other exposures include the Philippine Peso and British Pounds Sterling. These
foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support purchases and financing
transactions made in the normal course of business, and accordingly, are not speculative in nature.
The contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions, generally
one year or less. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133
(SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, hedges related to
anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as
cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly. Derivative instruments are employed
to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and
quantified. As the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception,
forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract
to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction, with the effective portion of
the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income (OCI) in shareholders equity and reclassified into earnings in the
same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any residual change in fair value
of the instruments, or ineffectiveness, is recognized immediately in other income/expense.
Additionally, the Company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge
the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a
non-functional currency. Changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in
other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or
liability being hedged. As of August 1, 2009, the total notional amount of these undesignated
hedges was $45.7 million. The fair value of these hedging instruments in our condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of August 1, 2009 was immaterial.
Interest Rate Exposure Management On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into interest rate swap
transactions related to its outstanding notes where the Company swapped the notional amount of its
$375 million of fixed rate debt at 5.0% into floating interest rate debt through July 1, 2014.
Under the terms of the swaps, the Company will (i) receive on the $375 million notional amount a
5.0% annual interest payment that is paid in two installments on the 1st of
every January and July, commencing January 1, 2010 through and ending on the maturity date; and
(ii) pay on the $375 million notional amount an annual three-month LIBOR plus 2.05% (2.64% as of
August 1, 2009) interest payment, payable in four installments on the 1st of
every January, April, July and October, commencing on October 1, 2009 and ending on the maturity
date. The LIBOR based rate is set quarterly three months prior to the date of the interest
payment. The Company designated these swaps as fair value hedges and is accounting for them in
accordance with SFAS 133. The fair value of the swaps at inception
were zero and subsequent changes
in the fair value of the interest rate swaps were reflected in the carrying value of the interest
rate swaps on the balance sheet. The carrying value of the debt on the balance sheet was adjusted
by an equal and offsetting amount. The
19
gain or loss on the hedged item (that is fixed-rate
borrowings) attributable to the hedged benchmark interest rate risk and the offsetting gain or loss
on the related interest rate swaps for the three and nine months ended August 1, 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) on |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Income |
Income Statement Classification |
|
Swaps |
|
on Note |
|
Effect |
Other income |
|
$ |
1,488 |
|
|
$ |
(1,488 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
The amounts earned and owed under the swap agreements are accrued each period and are reported in
interest expense. There was no ineffectiveness recognized in any of the periods presented.
The market risk associated with the Companys derivative instruments results from currency exchange
rate or interest rate movements that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying
transactions, assets and liabilities being hedged. The counterparties to the agreements relating to
the Companys derivative instruments consist of a number of major international financial
institutions with high credit ratings. The Company does not believe that there is significant risk
of nonperformance by these counterparties because the Company continually monitors the credit
ratings of such counterparties, and limits the financial exposure with any one financial
institution. Furthermore, none of our derivative transactions are subject to collateral or other
security arrangements and do not contain provisions that are dependent on our credit ratings from
any credit rating agency. While the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial
instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions, they do not represent the
amount of the Companys exposure to credit risk. The amounts potentially subject to credit risk
(arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts) are
generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparties obligations under the
contracts exceed the obligations of the Company to the counterparties. As a result of the above
considerations, we do not consider the risk of counterparty default to be significant.
The Company records the fair value of its derivative financial instruments in the consolidated
financial statements in other current assets, other assets or accrued liabilities, depending on
their net position, regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the derivative contract.
Changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments are either recognized
periodically in earnings or in shareholders equity as a component of OCI depending on whether the
derivative financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting as defined by SFAS 133 and whether
it is a cash flow hedge or a fair value hedge. Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are
recorded in OCI and reclassified into earnings when the underlying contract matures. Changes in
the fair values of derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting are reported in earnings as they
occur.
The total notional amount of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments under SFAS
133 as of August 1, 2009 is as follows: $375 million of interest rate swap agreements accounted
as fair value hedges, and $124.4 million of cash flow hedges denominated in Euros, British Pounds
Sterling and Philippine Pesos. The fair value of these hedging instruments in our condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of August 1, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
1,488 |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
Accrued Liabilities |
|
$ |
5,679 |
|
The effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on our condensed consolidated
statement of income for the three and nine months ended August 1, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 1, 2009 |
Gain recognized in OCI on derivative, net of tax of $1,307 and $5,656, respectively |
|
$ |
7,838 |
|
|
$ |
37,867 |
|
Gain (loss) reclassified from OCI into income, net of tax of $29 and $1,819,
respectively |
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
(12,727 |
) |
The amounts reclassified into earnings before tax are recognized in cost of sales and operating
expenses as follows: for the three month period ended August 1, 2009, $0.1 million in cost of
sales, and $0.1 million in selling, marketing, general and administrative; and for the nine month
period ended August 1, 2009, $6.5 million in cost of sales, $4.4 million in research and
development and $3.6 million in selling, marketing, general and administrative. All derivative
gains (losses) included in OCI will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months.
There was no ineffectiveness for the three and nine months ended August 1, 2009.
20
Note 10 Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The Company annually evaluates goodwill for impairment as well as whenever events or changes in
circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. Because the
Company has one reporting segment under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company utilizes the entity-wide approach for assessing
goodwill for impairment and compares its market value to its net book value to determine if an
impairment exists. No impairment of goodwill resulted from the Companys most recent evaluation of
goodwill for impairment, which occurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. No impairment of
goodwill resulted in any of the fiscal years presented. The Companys next scheduled annual
impairment assessment will be made in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. The following table
presents the changes in goodwill during the first nine months of fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
235,175 |
|
Acquisition of AudioAsics (1) |
|
|
3,071 |
|
Acquisition of Integrant Technologies (2) |
|
|
2,098 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
7,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
247,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The final milestone related to this 2006 acquisition was achieved
in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
The company purchased the remaining outstanding minority shares
related to this 2006 acquisition during the third quarter of fiscal 2009. |
Intangible Assets
The Company reviews identified intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying value to future undiscounted cash flows
the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which
the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market
price, if any, or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique.
Intangible assets, which will continue to be amortized, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Technology-based |
|
$ |
39,099 |
|
|
$ |
31,520 |
|
|
$ |
36,516 |
|
|
$ |
25,731 |
|
Tradename |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
Customer Relationships |
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
4,529 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
6,534 |
|
|
|
6,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
52,097 |
|
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
$ |
49,017 |
|
|
$ |
36,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an
accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic
use. The remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of
approximately 0.7 years.
21
Amortization expense was $1.7 million and $2.4 million for the three-month periods ended August 1,
2009 and August 2, 2008, respectively, and $5.2 million and $7.5 million for the nine-month periods
ended August 1, 2009 and August 2, 2008, respectively.
The Company expects amortization expense for these intangible assets to be:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
Amortization |
Year |
|
Expense |
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
2,209 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
5,240 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
1,367 |
|
Note 11 Pension Plans
The Company has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-U.S.
employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices. The Companys
funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local
requirements of each country. The plans assets consist primarily of U.S. and non-U.S. equity
securities, bonds, property and cash.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted the measurement date provision of
SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and other Postretirement Plans an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) (SFAS 158). This provision requires the
measurement date of the plans funded status to be the same as the Companys fiscal year end. In
accordance with the adoption provisions of SFAS 158, the Company changed its measurement date from
September 30, 2008 to November 1, 2008, the Companys fiscal year-end, and recorded a $0.2 million
adjustment to retained earnings in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Net periodic pension cost of non-U.S. plans is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
$ |
2,467 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2,731 |
) |
|
|
(3,187 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of initial net asset |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Amortization of net (gain) loss |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4,699 |
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
7,008 |
|
|
|
7,828 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(7,870 |
) |
|
|
(9,416 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Amortization of initial net asset |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
Amortization of net (gain) loss |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
3,430 |
|
|
$ |
5,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Pension contributions of $1.9 million and $5.7 million were made by the Company during the three
and nine months ended August 1, 2009. The Company presently anticipates contributing an additional
$1.6 million to fund its defined benefit pension plans in fiscal year 2009 for a total of $7.3
million.
Note 12 Revolving Credit Facility
As of August 1, 2009, the Company had $1,724.4 million of cash and cash equivalents and short term
investments, of which $426.0 million was held in the United States. The balance of the Companys
cash and cash equivalents and short term investments was held outside the United States in various
foreign subsidiaries. As the Company intends to reinvest certain of its foreign earnings
indefinitely, this cash is not available to meet certain of the Companys cash requirements in the
United States, including for cash dividends and common stock repurchases. The Company entered into a
five-year, $165 million unsecured revolving credit facility with certain institutional lenders in
May 2008. To date, the Company has not borrowed under this credit facility but the Company may
borrow in the future and use the proceeds for support of commercial paper issuance, stock
repurchases, dividend payments, acquisitions, capital expenditures, working capital and other
lawful corporate purposes. Any advances under this credit agreement will accrue interest at rates
that are equal to LIBOR plus a margin that is based on the Companys leverage ratio. The terms of
this facility also include financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a minimum
interest coverage ratio and not exceed a maximum leverage ratio. The Company is currently compliant
with these covenants. The terms of the facility also impose restrictions on the Companys ability
to undertake certain transactions, to create certain liens on assets and to incur certain
subsidiary indebtedness.
Note 13 Long-Term Debt
On June 30, 2009, the Company issued $375 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% notes due
July 1, 2014 (the Notes) with semi-annual fixed interest payments on January 1 and July 1 of each
year, commencing January 1, 2010. The sale of the Notes was made pursuant to the terms of an
underwriting agreement dated June 25, 2009 between the Company and Credit Suisse Securities (USA)
LLC, as representative of the several underwriters named therein. The net proceeds of the offering
were $370.4 million, after issuing at a discount and deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and
commissions, which will be amortized over the term of the Notes. The indenture governing the Notes
contains covenants that may limit the Companys ability to: incur, create, assume or guarantee any
debt for borrowed money secured by a lien upon its principal property; enter into sale and
lease-back transactions; and consolidate with or merge into, or transfer or lease all or
substantially all of its assets to, any other party.
On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into interest rate swap transactions where the Company
swapped the notional amount of its $375 million of fixed rate debt at 5.0% into floating interest
rate debt through July 1, 2014. Under the terms of the swaps, the Company will (i) receive on the
$375 million notional amount a 5.0% annual interest payment that is paid in two installments on the
1st of every January and July, commencing January 1, 2010 through and ending
on the maturity date; and (ii) pay on the $375 million notional amount an annual three-month LIBOR
plus 2.05% (2.64% as of August 1, 2009) interest payment, payable in four installments on the
1st of every January, April, July and October, commencing on October 1, 2009
and ending on the maturity date. The LIBOR based rate is set quarterly three months prior to the
date of the interest payment. The Company designated these swaps as fair value hedges and is
accounting for them in accordance with SFAS 133. The changes in the fair value of the interest
rate swaps were reflected in the carrying value of the interest rate swaps in other assets on the
balance sheet. The carrying value of the debt on the balance sheet was adjusted by an equal and
offsetting amount.
Note 14 Common Stock Repurchase
The Companys common stock repurchase program has been in place since August 2004. In the
aggregate, the Board of Directors has authorized the Company to repurchase $4 billion of the
Companys common stock under the program. Under the program, the Company may repurchase
outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately
negotiated transactions. Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Companys Board of
Directors, the repurchase program will expire when the Company has repurchased all shares
authorized under the program. As of August 1, 2009, the Company had repurchased a total of
approximately 114.7 million shares of its common stock for approximately $3,908.4 million under
this program. An additional $91.6 million of shares remains available for repurchase under the
current authorized program. The repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of
common stock. The Company also from time to time repurchases shares in settlement of employee tax
withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units, or the
exercise of stock options. Any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several
factors including the amount of cash available to the Company in the United States, our financial
performance, outlook and liquidity.
23
Note 15 Discontinued Operations
In November 2007, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with certain subsidiaries
of ON Semiconductor Corporation to sell the Companys CPU voltage regulation and PC thermal
monitoring business which consists of core voltage regulator products for the central processing
unit in computing and gaming applications and temperature sensors and fan-speed controllers for
managing the temperature of the central processing unit. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008,
the Company completed the sale of this business for net cash proceeds of $138 million, which was
net of other cash payments of approximately $1.4 million. The Company made final additional cash
payments of approximately $2.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. In connection with
the purchase and sale agreement, $7.5 million was placed into escrow and was excluded from the gain
calculations. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 of $78
million, or
$43 million net of tax, which was recorded as a gain on sale of discontinued operations. During
the third quarter of fiscal 2008, additional proceeds were released from escrow and an additional
pre-tax gain of $6.6 million, or $3.8 million net of tax, was recorded as a gain on sale of
discontinued operations. Additionally, at the time of the sale, the Company entered into a
one-year manufacturing supply agreement with a subsidiary of ON Semiconductor Corporation for an
additional $37 million. The Company has allocated the proceeds from this arrangement based on the
fair value of the two elements of this transaction: 1) the sale of a business and 2) the obligation
to manufacture product for a one-year period. As a result, $85 million was recorded as a liability
related to the manufacturing supply agreement, all of which has been utilized. The liability was
included in current liabilities of discontinued operations on the Companys consolidated balance
sheet. The Company recorded the revenue associated with this manufacturing supply agreement in
discontinued operations. As a result, the Company classified inventory for this arrangement as a
current asset of discontinued operations. The Company may receive additional proceeds of up to $1
million, currently held in escrow, upon the resolution of certain contingent items, which would be
recorded as additional gain from the sale of discontinued operations.
In September 2007, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its Baseband Chipset
Business to MediaTek Inc. The decision to sell the Baseband Chipset Business was due to the
Companys decision to focus its resources in areas where its signal processing expertise can
provide unique capabilities and earn superior returns. On January 11, 2008, the Company completed
the sale of its Baseband Chipset Business for net cash proceeds of $269 million. The cash proceeds
received were net of a refundable withholding tax of $62 million and other cash payments of
approximately $9 million. The Company made additional cash payments of $7.8 million during fiscal
2008, primarily related to transaction fees and retention payments to employees that transferred to
MediaTek Inc. The Company made additional cash payments of $1.3 million during the second quarter
of fiscal 2009 related to retention payments for employees who transferred to MediaTek Inc. The
Company expects to make additional cash payments of approximately $1.2 million in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009 for reimbursement of intellectual property license fees incurred by MediaTek
Inc. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain in fiscal 2008 of $278 million, or $202 million net of
tax, which is recorded as a gain on sale of discontinued operations. The Company may receive
additional proceeds of up to $10 million, currently held in escrow, upon the resolution of certain
contingent items, which would be recorded as additional gain from the sale of discontinued
operations.
The Company received additional amounts under various transition service agreements entered into in
connection with these dispositions. The transition service agreements included manufacturing,
engineering support and certain human resource services and information technology systems support.
At the time of the disposition the Company evaluated the nature of the transition services and
concluded the services would be primarily completed within the one-year assessment period, and the
Company did not have the ability to exert significant influence over the disposed businesses
operating and financial policies. Accordingly, the Company concluded that it did not have a
significant continuing involvement with the disposed businesses and has presented the disposition
of these businesses as discontinued operations pursuant to SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
The following amounts related to the CPU voltage regulation and PC thermal monitoring and Baseband
Chipset businesses have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as discontinued
operations. These amounts also include the revenue and costs of sales provided under a
manufacturing supply agreement between the Company and a subsidiary of ON Semiconductor
Corporation, which terminated during the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,274 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,941 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
10,332 |
|
|
$ |
93,767 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
10,847 |
|
|
|
73,479 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14,401 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(362,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
368,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(894 |
) |
|
|
107,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
261,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets reclassified to current assets of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refundable foreign withholding tax |
|
$ |
62,037 |
|
|
$ |
62,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets reclassified to non-current assets of discontinued
operations |
|
$ |
62,037 |
|
|
$ |
62,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,105 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
12,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities reclassified to current liabilities of discontinued
operations |
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
18,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16 Income Taxes
The Company has provided for potential liabilities due in the various jurisdictions in which the
Company operates. Judgment is required in determining the worldwide income tax expense provision.
In the ordinary course of global business, there are many transactions and calculations where the
ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Some of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of cost
reimbursement arrangements among related entities. Although the Company believes its estimates are
reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be
different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such
differences could have a material impact on the Companys income tax provision and operating
results in the period in which such determination is made.
Fiscal Year 2004 and 2005 IRS Examination
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the IRS completed its field examination of the Companys
fiscal years 2004 and 2005. On January 2, 2008, the IRS issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005,
which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years. The Company has recorded
taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments. There are four items with an
additional potential total tax liability of $46 million. The Company has concluded, based on
discussions with its tax advisors, that these four items are not likely to result in any additional
tax liability. Therefore, the Company has not
25
recorded any additional tax liability for these items
and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes
for the resolution of differences between the IRS and taxpayers. The Companys initial meeting
with the appellate division of the IRS was held in May 2009. Two of the unresolved matters are
one-time issues and pertain to Section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code related to the beneficial
tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under The American Jobs Creation Act. The
other matters pertain to the computation of research and development (R&D) tax credits and the
profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the United States. These latter
two matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years.
Fiscal Year 2006 and 2007 IRS Examination
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the IRS completed its field examination of the Companys
fiscal years 2006 and 2007. The IRS and the Company have agreed on the treatment of a number of
issues that have been included in an Issue Resolutions Agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax
returns. However, no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues, including
the same R&D credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and
2005, the pricing of intercompany sales (transfer pricing), and the deductibility of certain stock
option compensation expenses. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the IRS issued its report
for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007, which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal
years. The Company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed
adjustments. There are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $195 million.
The Company concluded, based on discussions with its tax advisors, that these four items are not
likely to result in any additional tax liability. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any
additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the
normal processes for the resolution of differences between the IRS and taxpayers. With the
exception of the proposed adjustment related to the deductibility of certain stock option expenses,
the other three matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2006 and 2007 as well as for
subsequent years.
Fiscal Year 2008 IRS Examination
The IRS has not started their examination of fiscal year 2008.
Although the Company believes its estimates of income tax payable are reasonable, no assurance can
be given that the Company will prevail in the matters raised and that the outcome of one or all of
these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax
provisions and accruals. The Company believes such differences would not have a material impact on
the Companys financial condition but could have a material impact on the Companys income tax
provision, operating results and operating cash flows in the period in which such matters are
resolved.
Note 17 New Accounting Standards
Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162)
(SFAS 168). SFAS 168 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental
entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as
the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB. SFAS 168 is effective
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009,
which is the Companys fourth fiscal quarter of 2009. Upon adoption the Codification will be used
to identify authoritative accounting standards.
Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167).
SFAS 167 requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises
variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. Additionally, an enterprise is required to assess whether it has an implicit financial
responsibility to ensure that a variable interest entity operates as designed when determining
whether it has the power to direct the activities of the variable interest entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance. SFAS 167 is effective for fiscal years
that begin after November 15, 2009, which is the Companys fiscal year 2011. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 167 may have on its financial condition and
results of operations.
26
Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166). SFAS 166 changes the way entities account for
securitizations and other transfers of financial instruments. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal
years that begin after November 15, 2009, which is the Companys fiscal year 2011. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 166 may have on its financial condition and
results of operations.
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R).
SFAS 141R requires an acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair value on the
acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs be
recognized separately from the acquisition. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008, which is the Companys fiscal year 2010. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 141R may have on its financial condition and results of
operations. The adoption of SFAS 141R will change the Companys accounting treatment for business
combinations on a prospective basis beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Noncontrolling Interests
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling or minority interest in a
subsidiary is considered an ownership interest and, accordingly, requires all entities to report
such interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, which is the Companys fiscal year
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 160 may have on its
financial condition and results of operations.
Note 18 Subsequent Event
In accordance with SFAS 165, we have evaluated subsequent events through the issuance of these
financial statements which occurred on August 18, 2009. On August 17, 2009, the Companys Board of
Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.20 per outstanding share of common stock. The dividend
will be paid on September 16, 2009 to all shareholders of record at the close of business on August
27, 2009.
27
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the
audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended November 1, 2008.
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
including in particular the section entitled Outlook, contains forward-looking statements
regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under
the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act). These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and
projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our
management. Words such as expects, anticipates, targets, goals, projects, intends,
plans, believes, seeks, estimates, continues, may, variations of such words and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements
that refer to projections regarding our future financial performance, particularly in light of the
ongoing global credit and financial market crisis; our anticipated growth and trends in our
businesses, our capital needs and capital expenditures; our market position and competitive changes
in the marketplace for our products; our ability to innovate new products and technologies; the
timing or the effectiveness of our efforts to refocus our operations and reduce our cost structure
and the expected amounts of any cost savings related to those efforts; our ability to access credit
or capital markets; our ability to pay dividends or repurchase stock; our ability to service our
outstanding debt; our expected tax rate; our third-party suppliers; intellectual property and
litigation matters; potential acquisitions or divestitures; key personnel; the effect of new
accounting pronouncements and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are
forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only
predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict,
including those identified in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in
any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking
statements except to the extent required by law.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we sold our baseband chipset business and related support
operations, or Baseband Chipset Business, to MediaTek Inc. and sold our CPU voltage regulation and
PC thermal monitoring business to certain subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation. The
financial results of these businesses are presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated
statements of income for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities related to these
businesses are reflected as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the consolidated
balance sheets as of August 1, 2009 and November 1, 2008. Unless otherwise noted, this
Managements Discussion and Analysis relates only to financial results from continuing operations.
Results of Operations
(all tabular amounts in thousands except per share amounts and percentages)
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
491,991 |
|
|
$ |
658,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,443,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,922,235 |
|
Gross margin % |
|
|
54.1 |
% |
|
|
61.0 |
% |
|
|
55.2 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
Income from continuing operations,
net of tax |
|
$ |
65,460 |
|
|
$ |
129,195 |
|
|
$ |
141,799 |
|
|
$ |
380,935 |
|
Income from continuing operations,
net of tax as a % of revenue |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
Diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
The year-to-year revenue changes by end market and product category are more fully outlined below
under Revenue Trends by End Market and Revenue Trends by Product Type.
28
In the third quarter of fiscal 2009, our revenue decreased 25% from the third quarter of fiscal
2008 and our diluted earnings per share from continuing operations decreased by 50%. In the first
nine months of fiscal 2009, our revenue decreased 25% from the first nine months of fiscal 2008 and
our diluted earnings per share from continuing operations decreased by 62%. Cash flow from
operations in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 was $269.5 million, or 19% of revenue. We
received net proceeds of $370.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 from the issuance of
long-term debt and had $1,724.4 million of cash and short-term investments as of August 1, 2009.
The global credit crisis and deteriorating economic conditions could continue to result in cautious
customer spending behavior. We cannot predict the severity, duration or precise impact of the
economic downturn on our future financial results. Consequently, our reported results for the
third quarter of fiscal 2009 may not be indicative of our future results.
Revenue Trends by End Market
The following table summarizes revenue by end market. The categorization of revenue by end market
is determined using a variety of data points including the technical characteristics of the
product, the sold to customer information, the ship to customer information and the end
customer product or application into which our product will be incorporated. As data systems for
capturing and tracking this data evolve and improve, the categorization of products by end market
can vary over time. When this occurs, we reclassify revenue by end market for prior periods. Such
reclassifications typically do not materially change the sizing of, or the underlying trends of
results within, each end market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Industrial |
|
$ |
252,135 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
|
$ |
356,280 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
125,500 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
|
147,894 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
102,323 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
(21 |
)% |
|
|
129,784 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Computer |
|
|
12,033 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(52 |
)% |
|
|
25,028 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
491,991 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
$ |
658,986 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Industrial |
|
$ |
753,271 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
(28 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,043,899 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
391,399 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
427,143 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
258,350 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
|
380,291 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Computer |
|
|
40,288 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(43 |
)% |
|
|
70,902 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,443,308 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,922,235 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial The year-to-year decrease in both the three- and nine-month periods in industrial end
market revenue was primarily the result of a broad-based decline in demand in this end market,
which was most significant for products sold into the instrumentation, automotive and process
controls sectors of this end market.
Communications The year-to-year decrease in the three-month period in communications end market
revenue was primarily the result of a decrease in sales of analog products used in basestations and
optical applications. The year-to-year decrease in the nine-month period in communications end
market revenue was primarily the result of a decrease in sales of analog products used in wireless
handsets, optical and networking applications, which was partially offset by an increase in sales
of products used in basestations.
29
Consumer The year-to-year decrease in both the three- and nine-month periods in consumer end
market revenue was primarily the result of a decrease in demand for products used in home
entertainment, video game applications, and digital cameras, consistent with the global slowdown in
consumer spending.
Computer The year-to-year decrease in both the three- and nine-month periods in computer end
market revenue was primarily the result of a general slowdown in the PC market.
Revenue Trends by Product Type
The following table summarizes revenue by product categories. The categorization of our products
into broad categories is based on the characteristics of the individual products, the specification
of the products and in some cases the specific uses that certain products have within applications.
The categorization of products into categories is therefore subject to judgment in some cases and
can vary over time. In instances where products move between product categories, we reclassify the
amounts in the product categories for all prior periods. Such reclassifications typically do not
materially change the sizing of, or the underlying trends of results within, each product category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Converters |
|
$ |
239,100 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
$ |
302,812 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Amplifiers |
|
|
119,897 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
(30 |
%) |
|
|
170,526 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Other analog |
|
|
65,211 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
(19 |
%) |
|
|
80,352 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal analog signal processing |
|
|
424,208 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
|
553,690 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
Power management & reference |
|
|
27,986 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(24 |
%) |
|
|
36,674 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total analog products |
|
$ |
452,194 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
$ |
590,364 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General purpose DSP |
|
|
38,923 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(36 |
%) |
|
|
60,521 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Other DSP |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(89 |
%) |
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total digital signal processing |
|
$ |
39,797 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(42 |
%) |
|
$ |
68,622 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
491,991 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
%) |
|
$ |
658,986 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue* |
|
Converters |
|
$ |
694,856 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
$ |
881,354 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Amplifiers |
|
|
373,646 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
%) |
|
|
496,992 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Other analog |
|
|
170,304 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(30 |
%) |
|
|
243,012 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal analog signal processing |
|
|
1,238,806 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
(24 |
%) |
|
|
1,621,358 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
Power management & reference |
|
|
82,316 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(21 |
%) |
|
|
104,789 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total analog products |
|
$ |
1,321,122 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
(23 |
%) |
|
$ |
1,726,147 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General purpose DSP |
|
|
117,249 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(33 |
%) |
|
|
173,921 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Other DSP |
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(78 |
%) |
|
|
22,167 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total digital signal processing |
|
$ |
122,186 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(38 |
%) |
|
$ |
196,088 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,443,308 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
%) |
|
$ |
1,922,235 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The sum of the individual percentages may not equal the total due to rounding. |
30
The year-to-year decrease in revenue in the three- and nine-month periods ended August 1, 2009, was
due to declining demand in several markets that we serve, particularly the industrial and consumer
end markets, as a result of an overall decline in the worldwide economy.
Revenue Trends by Geographic Region
Revenue by geographic region, based upon customer location, for the three- and nine-month periods
ended August 1, 2009 and August 2, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Region |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
94,326 |
|
|
$ |
131,168 |
|
|
$ |
298,713 |
|
|
$ |
393,921 |
|
Rest of North and
South America |
|
|
23,961 |
|
|
|
25,433 |
|
|
|
63,714 |
|
|
|
70,578 |
|
Europe |
|
|
120,899 |
|
|
|
177,881 |
|
|
|
369,499 |
|
|
|
509,347 |
|
Japan |
|
|
91,480 |
|
|
|
128,457 |
|
|
|
235,749 |
|
|
|
380,940 |
|
China |
|
|
85,317 |
|
|
|
103,632 |
|
|
|
274,374 |
|
|
|
284,358 |
|
Rest of Asia |
|
|
76,008 |
|
|
|
92,415 |
|
|
|
201,259 |
|
|
|
283,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
491,991 |
|
|
$ |
658,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,443,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,922,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the three- and nine-month periods ended August 1, 2009 the predominant countries comprising
Rest of North and South America are Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising
Europe are Germany and Sweden; and the predominant countries comprising Rest of Asia are Taiwan
and Korea.
In the three- and nine-month periods ended August 2, 2008 the predominant countries comprising
Rest of North and South America are Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising
Europe are Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy; and the predominant countries
comprising Rest of Asia are Taiwan and Korea.
Sales declined in all geographic regions in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, as compared to the
third quarter of fiscal 2008, with sales in Europe experiencing the largest decline. This decline
in sales in Europe was partially attributable to a decline in the automotive end market.
Sales declined in all geographic regions in the first nine months of fiscal 2009, as compared to
the first nine months of fiscal 2008, with sales in Japan experiencing the largest decline. This
decline in sales in Japan was principally attributable to the general decline in consumer spending
attributable to the global economic crisis. The decline in China was smaller than the decline in
the other regions primarily due to the strong demand for our products used in Chinas recent
infrastructure build-out of the countrys next generation of communication technology.
Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
Gross margin |
|
$ |
266,229 |
|
|
$ |
401,794 |
|
|
$ |
796,783 |
|
|
$ |
1,173,618 |
|
Gross margin % |
|
|
54.1 |
% |
|
|
61.0 |
% |
|
|
55.2 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
Gross margin percentage was lower by 690 basis points in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 as
compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008 primarily as a result of a decrease in sales of $167.0
million and reduced operating levels in our manufacturing facilities that created adverse
utilization variances.
Gross margin percentage was lower by 590 basis points in the nine months ended August 1, 2009 as
compared to the nine months ended August 2, 2008, primarily as a result of a decrease in sales of
$478.9 million and reduced operating levels in our manufacturing facilities that created adverse
utilization variances. This decrease was partially offset by a better mix of products as revenues
from industrial and communications end markets, which earn relatively higher gross margins than our
average margin, declined less than our revenues from the consumer and computer end markets.
31
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
As of August 1, 2009, the total compensation cost related to unvested awards not yet recognized in
our statement of income was approximately $116.9 million (before tax consideration), which we will
recognize over a weighted average period of 1.7 years. See Note 3 in the Notes to our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
further information regarding our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
R&D expenses |
|
$ |
107,578 |
|
|
$ |
135,837 |
|
|
$ |
336,854 |
|
|
$ |
400,029 |
|
R&D expenses as a % of revenue |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
Research and development, or R&D, expenses decreased $28.3 million, or 21%, in the third quarter of
fiscal 2009 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008, and decreased $63.2 million, or 16%,
in the nine months ended August 1, 2009 as compared to the nine months ended August 2, 2008. These
decreases were primarily the result of the actions we took to constrain or permanently reduce
operating expenses as well as a decrease in bonus expense, which is a variable expense linked to
our overall profitability.
R&D expenses as a percentage of revenue will fluctuate from year-to-year depending on the amount of
revenue and the success of new product development efforts, which we view as critical to our future
growth. At any point in time we have hundreds of R&D projects underway, and we believe that none of
these projects is material on an individual basis. We expect to continue the development of
innovative technologies and processes for new products, and we believe that a continued commitment
to R&D is essential in order to maintain product leadership with our existing products and to
provide innovative new product offerings, and therefore, we expect to continue to make significant
R&D investments in the future.
Selling, Marketing, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
SMG&A expenses |
|
$ |
79,706 |
|
|
$ |
104,767 |
|
|
$ |
249,828 |
|
|
$ |
309,301 |
|
SMG&A expenses as a % of revenue |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
Selling, marketing, general and administrative, or SMG&A, expenses decreased $25.1 million, or 24%,
in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008, and decreased
$59.5 million, or 19%, in the nine months ended August 1, 2009 as compared to the same period of
fiscal 2008. These decreases were primarily the result of our actions taken to constrain or
permanently reduce operating expenses. In addition, we had lower bonus expense, which is a
variable expense linked to our overall profitability, and lower commission expenses, which are
variable expenses linked to our sales.
Special Charges
The following is a summary of the restructuring actions we have taken over the last several years.
Closure of Wafer Fabrication Facility in Sunnyvale
We ceased production at our California wafer fabrication facility in November 2006. We are paying
the lease obligation costs on a monthly basis over the remaining lease term, which expires in 2010.
We completed the clean-up activity during the second quarter of fiscal 2007, and we do not expect
to incur any additional charges related to this action.
32
Reorganization of Product Development and Support Programs
We recorded special charges in fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007 as a result of our decision to
reorganize our product development and support programs with the goal of providing greater focus on
our analog and digital signal processing product programs. We terminated the employment of all
employees associated with these programs and are paying amounts owed to employees for severance as
income continuance. We do not expect to incur any further charges related to this reorganization
action.
Consolidation of a Wafer Fabrication Facility in Limerick
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we recorded a special charge of $13.7 million as a result
of our decision to only use eight-inch technology at our wafer fabrication facility in Limerick.
Certain manufacturing processes and products produced on the Limerick facilitys six-inch
production line have transitioned to our existing eight-inch production line in Limerick while
others have transitioned to external foundries. The charge was for severance and fringe benefit
costs recorded pursuant to SFAS 88, Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of
Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, or SFAS 88, under our ongoing benefit
plan for 150 manufacturing employees associated with this action. As of August 1, 2009, we still
employed 4 of the 150 employees included in this action. Most of the production in the six-inch
wafer fabrication facility has ceased and the remaining production is expected to cease during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, at which time the employment of the remaining affected employees
will be terminated. These employees must continue to be employed by us until their employment is
involuntarily terminated in order to receive the severance benefit. During the fourth quarter of
2008, we recorded an additional charge of $1.5 million related to this action, of which $1.2
million was an adjustment to our original estimate of the severance costs and $0.3 million was for
clean-up and closure costs that we expensed as incurred. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009,
we recorded an additional charge of $0.6 million for clean-up and closure costs that we expensed as
incurred. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded an additional charge of $0.6
million for clean-up and closure costs that we expensed as incurred. We do not expect to incur
any further charges related to this action. We estimate that the closure of this facility will
result in annual cost savings of approximately $25 million per year, which we expect to realize
starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We expect these annual savings will be in cost of
sales, of which approximately $1 million relates to non-cash depreciation savings.
Reduction of Overhead Infrastructure Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we recorded a special charge as a result of our decision
to either deemphasize or exit certain businesses or products and focus investments in products and
end markets where we have better opportunities for profitable growth. In September 2007, we entered
into a definitive agreement to sell our Baseband Chipset Business. As a result, we decided to
reduce the support infrastructure in manufacturing, engineering and SMG&A to more appropriately
reflect our required overhead structure. We terminated the employment of all employees associated
with these programs and we are paying amounts owed to employees for severance as income
continuance. We do not expect to incur any further charges related to this action. These cost
reduction actions, which were substantially completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2008,
resulted in annual savings of approximately $15 million. We realized these savings as follows:
approximately $7 million in R&D expenses, approximately $6 million in SMG&A expenses and
approximately $2 million in cost of sales.
Reduction of Operating Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, in order to further reduce our operating cost structure
we recorded a special charge of $1.6 million for severance and fringe benefit costs recorded
pursuant to SFAS 88 under our ongoing benefit plan or statutory requirements at foreign locations,
for 19 engineering and SMG&A employees. We have terminated the employment of all of the employees
included in this charge and we are paying amounts owed to employees for severance as income
continuance.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded an additional charge of $19.1 million related
to this cost reduction action. Approximately $2.1 million of this charge was for lease obligation
costs for facilities that we ceased using during the first quarter of fiscal 2009; approximately
$0.8 million was for the write-off of property, plant and equipment; and approximately $0.6 million
was for contract termination, clean-up and closure costs that we expensed as incurred. The
remaining $15.6 million of this charge related to the severance and fringe benefit costs recorded
pursuant to SFAS 88 under our ongoing benefit plan or statutory requirements at foreign locations,
for 221 manufacturing employees and 149 engineering and selling, marketing, general and
administrative employees. As of August 1, 2009, we still employed 3 of the 370 employees included
in this cost reduction action. These employees must continue to be employed by us until their
employment is involuntarily terminated in order to receive the severance benefit.
33
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded an additional charge of $11.3 million related
to this cost reduction action. Approximately $0.1 million was for the write-off of property,
plant and equipment; and approximately $0.3 million
was for clean-up and closure costs that we expensed as incurred. The remaining $10.9 million of
this charge related to the severance and fringe benefit costs recorded pursuant to SFAS 88 under
our ongoing benefit plan or statutory requirements at foreign locations, for 24 manufacturing
employees and 153 engineering and selling, marketing, general and administrative employees. As of
August 1, 2009, we still employed 26 of the 177 employees included in this cost reduction action.
These employees must continue to be employed by us until their employment is involuntarily
terminated in order to receive the severance benefit.
We believe this cost reduction action, which was substantially completed during the second quarter
of fiscal 2009, will result in annual savings of approximately $36.4 million once fully
implemented. We expect these annual savings will be realized as follows: approximately $31.6
million in SMG&A expenses and approximately $4.8 million in cost of sales. A portion of these
savings is reflected in our results for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and the remainder of
the savings will be fully reflected in our results by the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Closure of a Wafer Fabrication Facility in Cambridge
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded a special charge of $22.1 million as a result
of our decision to consolidate our Cambridge, Massachusetts wafer fabrication facility into our
existing Wilmington, Massachusetts facility. In connection with the anticipated closure of this
facility, we evaluated the recoverability of the facilities manufacturing assets and concluded
that there was an impairment of approximately $12.9 million based on the revised period of intended
use. The remaining $9.2 million was for severance and fringe benefit costs recorded pursuant to
SFAS 88 under our ongoing benefit plan for 175 manufacturing employees and 9 selling, marketing,
general and administrative employees associated with this action. As of August 1, 2009, we still
employed all of the employees included in this action. We expect production to cease in the
Cambridge fabrication facility during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, at which time the
employment of the affected employees will be terminated. These employees must continue to be
employed by us until their employment is involuntarily terminated in order to receive the severance
benefit. We estimate that the closure of this facility will result in annual cost savings of
approximately $41 million per year, expected to be fully realized starting in the third quarter of
fiscal 2010. We expect these annual savings to be realized as follows: approximately $40.2 million
in cost of sales, of which approximately $4.0 million relates to non-cash depreciation savings, and
approximately $0.8 million in SMG&A expenses.
Operating Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
78,945 |
|
|
$ |
161,190 |
|
|
$ |
156,445 |
|
|
$ |
464,288 |
|
Operating income from continuing operations as
a % of revenue |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
The $82.2 million decrease in operating income from continuing operations in the third quarter of
fiscal 2009 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008 was primarily the result of a decrease
in revenue of $167.0 million and a 690 basis point decrease in gross margin percentage. This
decrease in operating income from continuing operations was partially offset by a decrease in R&D
and SMG&A expenses as more fully described above under the headings Research and Development and
Selling, Marketing, General and Administrative.
The $307.8 million decrease in operating income from continuing operations in the nine months ended
August 1, 2009 as compared to the same period of fiscal 2008 was primarily the result of a decrease
in revenue of $478.9 million, a 590 basis point decrease in gross margin percentage, and special
charges of $53.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2009. This decrease in operating
income from continuing operations was partially offset by a decrease in R&D and SMG&A expenses as
more fully described above under the headings Research and Development and Selling, Marketing,
General and Administrative.
34
Nonoperating (Income) Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1,368 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,368 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(2,558 |
) |
|
|
(8,205 |
) |
|
|
(13,881 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,400 |
) |
Other expense, (income) net |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonoperating income |
|
$ |
(1,082 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,541 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,773 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income was lower by $6.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to
the third quarter of fiscal 2008 primarily due to lower interest income earned on investments as a
result of lower interest rates in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to the third quarter
of fiscal 2008. In addition, we incurred interest expense during the third quarter of fiscal 2009
as a result of the issuance of $375 million aggregate principal 5.0% notes on June 30, 2009.
Nonoperating income was lower by $16.7 million in the nine months ended August 1, 2009 as compared
to the same period of fiscal 2008 primarily due to lower interest income earned on investments as a
result of lower interest rates in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 as compared to the first
nine months of fiscal 2008. In addition, we incurred interest expense during the first nine months
of fiscal 2009 as a result of the issuance of $375 million aggregate principal 5.0% notes on June
30, 2009.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
14,567 |
|
|
$ |
39,536 |
|
|
$ |
28,419 |
|
|
$ |
113,802 |
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
Our effective tax rate reflects the applicable tax rate in effect in the various tax jurisdictions
around the world where our income is earned. Our effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal
2009 was lower compared to our effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2008 primarily as
a result of a change in the mix of our income to jurisdictions where income is
taxed at a lower rate.
Our effective tax rate for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 was lower compared to our effective
tax rate for the first nine months of fiscal 2008 primarily as a result of our recording special
charges of $53.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2009, a portion of which provided a tax
benefit at the higher U.S. tax rate, and as a result of a change in the mix of our income to jurisdictions where income is taxed at a lower rate.
Income from Continuing Operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
65,460 |
|
|
$ |
129,195 |
|
|
$ |
141,799 |
|
|
$ |
380,935 |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax as
a % of revenue |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
Diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax, in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 was lower than
in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 by approximately $63.7 million primarily as a result of the
$82.2 million decrease in operating income that was partially offset by a lower provision for
income taxes in the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
Income from continuing operations, net of tax, in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 was lower
than in the first nine months of fiscal 2008 by approximately $239.1 million primarily as a result
of the $307.8 million decrease in operating income that was partially offset by a lower provision
for income taxes in the first nine months of fiscal 2009.
35
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
August 2, 2008 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,611 |
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
10,693 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,413 |
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
261,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We sold our Baseband Chipset Business to MediaTek Inc. and our CPU voltage regulation and PC
thermal monitoring business to certain subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation during the
first quarter of fiscal 2008. Accordingly, we have presented the results of the operations of
these businesses as discontinued operations within our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
Outlook
The following statements are based on current expectations. These statements are forward-looking,
and actual results may differ materially. Unless specifically mentioned, these statements do not
give effect to the potential impact of any mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, or business
combinations that may be announced or closed after the date of filing this report. These statements
supersede all prior statements regarding our business outlook made by us.
There are near-term indications that business conditions are improving. Order rates strengthened
throughout the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and have remained strong during the first two weeks of
August. Our book-to-bill ratio for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, as measured by end customer
bookings, was above one, and our fourth quarter opening backlog was up from last quarter. Given
these factors, we expect that our revenue will grow to approximately $510 million to $530 million
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. While we plan to continue to tightly manage inventory levels,
we expect a small increase in utilization, which should result in a gross margin in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009 of approximately 55.0%. In addition, we plan to continue to closely manage
operating expenses and expect them to increase slightly by approximately 1% to 2% in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009.
As a result, our plan is for diluted EPS from continuing operations to increase again to
approximately $0.24 to $0.26 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
August 2, 2008 |
Net cash provided by operations |
|
$ |
269,470 |
|
|
$ |
527,110 |
|
Net cash provided by operations as a %
of revenue |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
At August 1, 2009, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $1,724.4 million, an
increase of $414.8 million from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The primary source of funds for
the first nine months of fiscal 2009 was net cash generated from operating activities of $269.5
million and net proceeds of $370.4 from the issuance of our 5.0% Notes. The principal uses of funds
for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 were dividend payments of $174.7 million and capital
expenditures of $39.7 million.
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
November 1, 2008 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
244,025 |
|
|
$ |
315,290 |
|
Days sales outstanding |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
276,072 |
|
|
$ |
314,629 |
|
Days cost of sales in inventory |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Accounts receivable at August 1, 2009 decreased $71.3 million, or 23%, from the end of the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008. The decrease in receivables was primarily the result of lower revenue in
the third quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
Inventory at August 1, 2009 decreased by $38.6 million, or 12%, from the end of the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2008. The decrease in inventory, despite a lower level of sales, is primarily a result
of significant reductions in external manufacturing spending and additional factory shutdowns
during the first nine months of fiscal 2009.
Net additions to property, plant and equipment were $39.7 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2009 and were funded with a combination of cash on hand and cash generated from operations.
We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $55 million in fiscal 2009.
On August 17, 2009, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.20 per outstanding share
of our common stock. The dividend is payable on September 16, 2009 to shareholders of record on
August 27, 2009 and is expected to be approximately $58 million in the aggregate. We expect
quarterly dividends to continue at $0.20 per share, although they remain subject to declaration or
change by our Board of Directors. The payment of future dividends, if any, will be based on
several factors including our financial performance, outlook and liquidity.
Because our cash held outside the United States is not available to meet certain of our cash
requirements in the United States, including for cash dividends and common stock repurchases, on
June 30, 2009, we issued $375 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% notes due July 1, 2014
(the Notes) with annual interest payments of 5.0% paid in two installments on January 1 and July 1
of each year, commencing January 1, 2010. The net proceeds of the offering were $370.4 million,
after issuing at a discount and deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and commissions, which
will be amortized over the term of the Notes. We swapped the fixed interest portion of these Notes
for a variable interest rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 2.05% (2.64% as of August 1,
2009). The variable interest payments based on the variable annual rate are payable quarterly.
The LIBOR based rate is set quarterly three months prior to the date of the interest payment. The
indenture governing the Notes contains covenants that may limit our ability to: incur, create,
assume or guarantee any debt for borrowed money secured by a lien upon our principal property;
enter into sale and lease-back transactions; and consolidate with or merge into, or transfer or
lease all or substantially all of our assets to, any other party. In addition, we have a five-year
$165 million unsecured revolving credit facility that expires in May 2013. To date, we have not
borrowed under this credit facility but we may borrow in the future and use the proceeds for
support of commercial paper issuance, stock repurchases, dividend payments, acquisitions, capital
expenditures, working capital and other lawful corporate purposes.
At August 1, 2009, our principal source of liquidity was $1,724.4 million of cash and cash
equivalents and short-term investments. As of August 1, 2009, approximately $426.0 million of our
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were held in the United States. The balance
of our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments was held outside the United States in
various foreign subsidiaries. As we intend to reinvest certain of our foreign earnings
indefinitely, this cash held outside the United States is not available to meet certain of our cash
requirements in the United States, including for cash dividends and common stock repurchases.
The volatility in the credit markets has generally diminished liquidity and capital availability in
worldwide markets. We are unable to predict the likely duration and severity of the current
disruptions in the credit and financial markets and adverse global economic conditions. However,
we believe that our existing sources of liquidity and cash expected to be generated from future
operations, together with existing and anticipated available long-term financing, will be
sufficient to fund operations, capital expenditures, research and development efforts, dividend
payments (if any) and purchases of stock (if any) under our stock repurchase program in the
immediate future and for at least the next twelve months.
37
Contractual Obligations
During the first nine months of fiscal 2009, we distributed approximately $27 million from our
Deferred Compensation Plan as a result of elections made by plan participants under the provisions
of our Deferred Compensation Plan. These amounts represented compensation and/or stock option
gains previously deferred by those participants pursuant to the terms of our Deferred Compensation
Plan. The amounts distributed during fiscal 2009 were previously reflected in the More than 5
Years column of the contractual obligations table contained in the section entitled Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 1, 2008 because at that time we could not reasonably
estimate the timing of such withdrawals.
On June 30, 2009, we issued $375 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% notes due July 1, 2014
(the Notes) with semi-annual interest payments due on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing
January 1, 2010 and we also entered into interest rate swap transactions where we swapped the
notional amount of our $375 million of fixed rate debt at 5.0% into floating interest rate debt.
The swap hedges the benchmark interest rate of our $375 million Notes and has the effect of
swapping the 5.0% fixed rate of the Notes into a LIBOR-based floating rate. We make payments at a
variable interest rate based upon a three-month LIBOR plus 2.05% (2.64% as of August 1, 2009) in
four installments on the 1st of every January, April, July and October, commencing on
October 1, 2009 and ending on the maturity date. The LIBOR based rate is set quarterly three
months prior to the date of the interest payment. We receive fixed payments on the 1st
of every January and July, commencing January 1, 2010 and ending on the maturity date. The
interest rate swaps, as well as the Notes, mature on July 1, 2014.
Assuming the current three-month LIBOR remains the same for the duration of the agreement and
assuming the debt obligations are held to maturity, the following amounts will be due under the
debt and swap agreements and were not previously reflected in the contractual obligations table
contained in the section entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 1,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
1 Year |
|
1-3 Years |
|
4-5 Years |
|
5 Years |
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments associated with long-term debt obligations (1) |
|
$ |
93,802 |
|
|
$ |
18,802 |
|
|
$ |
37,500 |
|
|
$ |
37,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due under interest rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
50,367 |
|
|
$ |
10,037 |
|
|
$ |
20,179 |
|
|
$ |
20,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These interest payments will be completely offset by proceeds from our interest
rate swap agreements. |
There have not been any other material changes during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 to the
amounts presented in the table summarizing our contractual obligations included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 1, 2008.
38
New Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162)
(SFAS 168). SFAS 168 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental
entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as
the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB. SFAS 168 is effective
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009,
which is our fourth fiscal quarter of 2009. Upon adoption the Codification will be used to
identify authoritative accounting standards.
Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167).
SFAS 167 requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises
variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. Additionally, an enterprise is required to assess whether it has an implicit financial
responsibility to ensure that a variable interest entity operates as designed when determining
whether it has the power to direct the activities of the variable interest entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance. SFAS 167 is effective for fiscal years
that begin after November 15, 2009, which is our fiscal year 2011. We are currently evaluating
the impact, if any, that SFAS 167 may have on our financial condition and results of operations.
Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166). SFAS 166 changes the way entities account for
securitizations and other transfers of financial instruments. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal
years that begin after November 15, 2009, which is our fiscal year 2011. We are currently
evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 166 may have on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R).
SFAS 141R requires an acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair value on the
acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs be
recognized separately from the acquisition. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008, which is our fiscal year 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact, if
any, that SFAS 141R may have on our financial condition and results of operations. The adoption of
SFAS 141R will change our accounting treatment for business combinations on a prospective basis
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Noncontrolling Interests
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling or minority interest in a
subsidiary is considered an ownership interest and, accordingly, requires all entities to report
such interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, which is our fiscal year 2010. We
are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 160 may have on our financial condition and
results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There were no material changes in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 to the information provided
under the heading Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended November 1, 2008.
39
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Exposure
In June 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the benchmark interest
rate of our $375 million 5.0% Notes due July 1, 2014. The effect of the swap was to convert our
5.0% fixed interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 2.05%
(2.64% as of August 1, 2009). If LIBOR changes by 100 basis points, our annual interest expense
would change by $3.8 million.
There have been no other material changes in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 in the information
provided under Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk set forth in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 1, 2008.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of Analogs
disclosure controls and procedures as of August 1, 2009. The term disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on
the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of August 1, 2009, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. No change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred
during the quarter ended August 1, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
40
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Set forth below and elsewhere in this report and in other documents we file with the SEC are
descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this
report. The description below includes any material changes to and supersedes the description of
the risk factors affecting our business previously discussed in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 1, 2008 and Part II, Item 1A.
Risk Factors of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2009.
The current crisis in global credit and financial markets could further materially and adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
As widely reported, global credit and financial markets continue to experience extreme disruptions
in recent months, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in
consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, and uncertainty
about economic stability. Our business has been significantly affected by these conditions, and
there is no certainty that credit and financial markets and confidence in economic conditions will
not deteriorate further. These economic uncertainties affect businesses such as ours in a number of
ways, making it difficult to accurately forecast and plan our future business activities.
Accelerating layoffs, falling housing markets and the tightening of credit by financial
institutions may lead consumers and businesses to continue to postpone spending, which may cause
our customers to cancel, decrease or delay their existing and future orders with us. In addition,
the inability of customers to obtain credit could impair their ability to make timely payments to
us. Customer insolvencies in key industries, such as the automotive industry, could also
negatively impact our revenues and our ability to collect receivables. In addition, financial
difficulties experienced by our suppliers or distributors could result in product delays, increased
accounts receivable defaults and inventory challenges. We are unable to predict the likely duration
and severity of the current disruptions in the credit and financial markets and adverse global
economic conditions, and if the current uncertain economic conditions continue or further
deteriorate, we may record additional charges relating to restructuring costs or the impairment of
assets and our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Our future revenue, gross margins, operating results and net income are difficult to predict and
may materially fluctuate.
Our future revenue, gross margins, operating results and net income are difficult to predict and
may be materially affected by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
the effects of adverse economic conditions in the United States and international
markets, including the current crisis in global credit and financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in customer demand for our products and for end products that incorporate our
products; |
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our efforts to refocus our operations, including our ability to
reduce our cost structure in both the short term and over a longer duration; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of new product announcements or introductions by us, our customers or our
competitors; |
|
|
|
|
competitive pricing pressures; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in manufacturing yields, adequate availability of wafers and other raw
materials, and manufacturing, assembly and test capacity; |
|
|
|
|
any significant decline in our backlog; |
|
|
|
|
the timing, delay or cancellation of significant customer orders and our ability to
manage inventory; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to hire, retain and motivate adequate numbers of engineers and other
qualified employees to meet the demands of our customers; |
|
|
|
|
changes in geographic, product or customer mix; |
41
|
|
|
our ability to utilize our manufacturing facilities at efficient levels; |
|
|
|
|
potential significant litigation-related costs; |
|
|
|
|
the difficulties inherent in forecasting future operating expense levels, including with
respect to costs associated with labor, utilities, transportation and raw materials; |
|
|
|
|
the costs related to compliance with increasing worldwide environmental regulations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our effective tax rates in the United States, Ireland or worldwide; and |
|
|
|
|
the effects of public health emergencies, natural disasters, security risks, terrorist
activities, international conflicts and other events beyond our control. |
In addition, the semiconductor market has historically been cyclical and subject to significant
economic upturns and downturns. Our business is subject to rapid technological changes and there
can be no assurance, depending on the mix of future business, that products stocked in our
inventory will not be rendered obsolete before we ship them. As a result of these and other
factors, there can be no assurance that we will not experience material fluctuations in future
revenue, gross margins, operating results and net income on a quarterly or annual basis. In
addition, if our revenue, gross margins, operating results and net income do not meet the
expectations of securities analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock may decline.
Changes in our effective tax rate may impact our results of operations.
A number of factors may increase our future effective tax rate, including: the jurisdictions in
which profits are earned and taxed; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various
tax authorities; changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; adjustments
to income taxes upon finalization of various tax returns; increases in expenses not deductible for
tax purposes, including write-offs of acquired in-process research and development and impairments
of goodwill in connection with acquisitions; changes in available tax credits; and changes in tax
laws or the interpretation of such tax laws. Any significant increase in our future effective tax
rates could adversely impact our net income for future periods.
Long-term contracts are not typical for us and reductions, cancellations or delays in orders for
our products could adversely affect our operating results.
We typically do not have long-term sales contracts with our customers. In certain markets where
end-user demand may be particularly volatile and difficult to predict, some customers place orders
that require us to manufacture product and have it available for shipment, even though the customer
is unwilling to make a binding commitment to purchase all, or even any, of the product. In other
instances, we manufacture product based on forecasts of customer demands. As a result, we may incur
inventory and manufacturing costs in advance of anticipated sales and are subject to the risk of
cancellations of orders, leading to a sharp reduction of sales and backlog. Further, orders or
forecasts may be for products that meet the customers unique requirements so that those cancelled
or unrealized orders would, in addition, result in an inventory of unsaleable products, causing
potential inventory write-offs. As a result of lengthy manufacturing cycles for certain of the
products that are subject to these uncertainties, the amount of unsaleable product could be
substantial. Incorrect forecasts, or reductions, cancellations or delays in orders for our products
could adversely affect our operating results.
Our future success depends upon our ability to continue to innovate, improve our products, develop
and market new products, and identify and enter new markets.
Our success significantly depends on our continued ability to improve our products and develop and
market innovative new products. Product development, innovation and enhancement is often a complex,
time-consuming and costly process involving significant investment in research and development,
with no assurance of return on investment. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
develop and introduce new and improved products in a timely or efficient manner or that new and
improved products, if developed, will achieve market acceptance. Our products generally must
conform to various evolving and sometimes competing industry standards, which may adversely affect
our ability to compete in certain markets or require us to incur significant costs. In addition,
our customers generally impose very high quality and reliability standards on our products, which
often change and may be difficult or costly to satisfy. Any inability to satisfy customer quality
standards or comply with industry standards and technical requirements may adversely affect demand
for our products and our results of operations. In addition, our growth is dependent on our
continued ability to identify and penetrate new markets where we have limited
42
experience and
competition is intense. Also, some of our customers in these markets are less established, which
could subject us to increased credit risk. There can be no assurance that the markets we serve will
grow in the future, that our existing and new products will meet the requirements of these markets,
that our products will achieve customer acceptance in these markets, that competitors will not
force price reductions or take market share from us, or that we can achieve or maintain adequate
gross
margins or profits in these markets. Furthermore, a decline in demand in one or several of our
end-user markets could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products and our
results of operations.
We may not be able to compete successfully in markets within the semiconductor industry in the
future.
We face intense technological and pricing competition in the semiconductor industry, and we expect
this competition to increase in the future. Many other companies offer products that compete with
our products. Some have greater financial, manufacturing, technical and marketing resources than we
have. Some of our competitors may have more advantageous supply or development relationships with
our current and potential customers or suppliers. Our competitors also include emerging companies
selling specialized products in markets we serve. Competition is generally based on design and
quality of products, product performance, features and functionality, and product pricing,
availability and capacity, with the relative importance of these factors varying among products,
markets and customers. Existing or new competitors may develop products or technologies that more
effectively address the demands of our customers and markets with enhanced performance, features
and functionality, lower power requirements, greater levels of integration or lower cost. Increased
competition in certain markets has resulted in and may continue to result in declining average
selling prices, reduced gross margins and loss of market share in those markets. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the future against existing or new
competitors, or that our operating results will not be adversely affected by increased competition.
We rely on third-party subcontractors and manufacturers for some industry-standard wafers and
assembly and test services, and generally cannot control their availability or conditions of
supply.
We rely, and plan to continue to rely, on assembly and test subcontractors and on third-party wafer
fabricators to supply most of our wafers that can be manufactured using industry-standard submicron
processes. This reliance involves several risks, including reduced control over availability,
capacity utilization, delivery schedules, manufacturing yields, quality assurance and costs.
Additionally, we utilize a limited number of third-party wafer fabricators, primarily Taiwan
Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC. These suppliers manufacture components in accordance
with our proprietary designs and specifications. In addition, these suppliers often provide
manufacturing services to our competitors and therefore periods of increased industry demand may
result in capacity constraints. If these suppliers are unable or unwilling to manufacture and
deliver sufficient quantities of components to us on the time schedule and of the quality that we
require, we may be forced to seek to engage additional or replacement suppliers, which could result
in additional expenses and delays in product development or shipment of product to our customers.
Approximately 46% of our revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and approximately 44% of
our fiscal year 2008 revenue was from products fabricated at third-party wafer-fabrication
facilities, primarily TSMC.
The markets for semiconductor products are cyclical, and increased production may lead to
overcapacity and lower prices, and conversely, we may not be able to satisfy unexpected demand for
our products.
The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry has resulted in periods when demand for our
products has increased or decreased rapidly. If we expand our operations and workforce too rapidly
or procure excessive resources in anticipation of increased demand for our products, and that
demand does not materialize at the pace at which we expect or declines, or if we overbuild in a
down market, our operating results may be adversely affected as a result of increased operating
expenses, reduced margins, underutilization of capacity or asset impairment charges. These
capacity expansions by us and other semiconductor manufacturers could also lead to overcapacity in
our target markets which could lead to price erosion that would adversely impact our operating
results. Conversely, during periods of rapid increases in demand, our available capacity may not
be sufficient to satisfy the demand. In addition, we may not be able to expand our workforce and
operations in a sufficiently timely manner, procure adequate resources, or locate suitable
third-party suppliers, to respond effectively to changes in demand for our existing products or to
the demand for new products requested by our customers, and our current or future business could be
materially and adversely affected.
Our semiconductor products are complex and we may be subject to product warranty and indemnity
claims, which could result in significant costs and damage to our reputation and adversely affect
the market acceptance of our products.
Semiconductor products are highly complex and may contain defects when they are first introduced or
as new versions are developed. We generally warrant our products to our customers for one year from
the date title passes from us. We invest
43
significant resources in the testing of our products;
however, if any of our products contain defects, we may be required to incur additional development
and remediation costs, pursuant to warranty and indemnification provisions in our customer
contracts and purchase orders. These problems may divert our technical and other resources from
other product development efforts and could result in claims against us by our customers or others,
including liability for costs associated with product recalls, which may adversely impact our
operating results. We may also be subject to customer indemnity claims. Our customers have on
occasion been sued, and may in the future be sued by third parties with respect to infringement or
other
product matters, and those customers may seek indemnification from us under the terms and
conditions of our sales contracts with them. In certain cases, our potential indemnification
liability may be significant. There can be no assurance that we are adequately insured to protect
against all claims and potential liabilities. If any of our products contains defects, or has
reliability, quality or compatibility problems, our reputation may be damaged, which could make it
more difficult for us to sell our products to existing and prospective customers and could
adversely affect our operating results.
We have manufacturing processes that utilize a substantial amount of technology as the fabrication
of integrated circuits is a highly complex and precise process. Minute impurities, contaminants in
the manufacturing environment, difficulties in the fabrication process, defects in the masks used
in the wafer manufacturing process, manufacturing equipment failures, wafer breakage or other
factors can cause a substantial percentage of wafers to be rejected or numerous dice on each wafer
to be nonfunctional. While we have significant expertise in semiconductor manufacturing, it is
possible that some processes could become unstable. This instability could result in manufacturing
delays and product shortages, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
We may be unable to adequately protect our proprietary rights, which may limit our ability to
compete effectively.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property. We primarily
rely on patent, mask work, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure
agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary technologies and processes. Despite our
efforts to protect our proprietary technologies and processes, it is possible that competitors or
other unauthorized third parties may obtain, copy, use or disclose our technologies and processes.
Moreover, the laws of foreign countries in which we design, manufacture, market and sell our
products may afford little or no effective protection of our proprietary technology.
There can be no assurance that the claims allowed in our issued patents will be sufficiently broad
to protect our technology. In addition, any of our existing or future patents may be challenged,
invalidated or circumvented. As such, any rights granted under these patents may not provide us
with meaningful protection. We may not have foreign patents or pending applications corresponding
to our U.S. patents and applications. Even if foreign patents are granted, effective enforcement in
foreign countries may not be available. If our patents do not adequately protect our technology,
our competitors may be able to offer products similar to ours. Our competitors may also be able to
develop similar technology independently or design around our patents. Other companies or
individuals have obtained patents covering a variety of semiconductor designs and processes, and we
might be required to obtain licenses under some of these patents or be precluded from making and
selling infringing products, if those patents are found to be valid. There can be no assurance that
we would be able to obtain licenses, if required, upon commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and strategic
partners. We also try to control access to and distribution of our technologies, documentation and
other proprietary information. Despite these efforts, internal or external parties may attempt to
copy, disclose, obtain or use our products or technology without our authorization. Also, former
employees may seek employment with our business partners, customers or competitors, and there can
be no assurance that the confidential nature of our proprietary information will be maintained in
the course of such future employment.
We are involved in frequent litigation, including regarding intellectual property rights, which
could be costly to bring or defend and could require us to redesign products or pay significant
royalties.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent claims and litigation involving patent and
other intellectual property rights, including claims arising under our contractual obligations to
indemnify our customers. From time to time, we receive claims from third parties asserting that our
products or processes infringe their patents or other intellectual property rights. In the event a
third party makes a valid intellectual property claim against us and a license is not available to
us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we could be forced either to redesign or to stop
production of products incorporating that intellectual property, and our operating results could be
materially and adversely affected. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our patents or other of
our intellectual property rights or to defend us against claims of infringement, and this
litigation could be costly and divert the attention of our key personnel. We could be subject to
warranty or product liability claims that could lead to significant costs and expenses as we defend
those claims or pay damage awards. There can be no assurance that we are adequately insured to
protect against all claims and potential liabilities. We may incur costs and expenses relating to a
recall of
44
our customers products due to an alleged failure of components we supply. An adverse
outcome in litigation could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or on our
operating results or cash flows in the period in which the litigation is resolved.
If we do not retain our key personnel, our ability to execute our business strategy will be
adversely affected.
Our continued success depends to a significant extent upon the recruitment, retention and effective
succession of our executive officers and key management and technical personnel, particularly our
experienced engineers. The competition for these
employees is intense. The loss of the services of one or more of our key personnel could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results. In addition, there could be a material adverse
effect on our business should the turnover rates for engineers and other key personnel increase
significantly or if we are unable to continue to attract qualified personnel. We do not maintain
any key person life insurance policy on any of our officers or employees.
To remain competitive, we may need to acquire other companies, purchase or license technology from
third parties, or enter into other strategic transactions in order to introduce new products or
enhance our existing products.
An element of our business strategy involves expansion through the acquisitions of businesses,
assets, products or technologies that allow us to complement our existing product offerings, expand
our market coverage, increase our engineering workforce or enhance our technological capabilities.
We may not be able to find businesses that have the technology or resources we need and, if we find
such businesses, we may not be able to purchase or license the technology or resources on
commercially favorable terms or at all. Acquisitions and technology licenses are difficult to
identify and complete for a number of reasons, including the cost of potential transactions,
competition among prospective buyers and licensees, the need for regulatory approvals, and
difficulties related to integration efforts. In order to finance a potential transaction, we may
need to raise additional funds by issuing securities or borrowing money. We may not be able to find
financing on favorable terms, and the sale of our stock may result in the dilution of our existing
shareholders or the issuance of securities with rights that are superior to the rights of our
common shareholders.
Acquisitions also involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulty integrating acquired technologies, operations and personnel with our existing businesses; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of management attention in connection with both negotiating the acquisitions and integrating the assets; |
|
|
|
|
strain on managerial and operational resources as management tries to oversee larger operations; |
|
|
|
|
the future funding requirements for acquired companies, which may be significant; |
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies; and |
|
|
|
|
increased risk of costly and time-consuming litigation. |
If we are unable to successfully address these risks, we may not realize some or all of the
expected benefits of the acquisition, which may have an adverse effect on our business plans and
operating results.
We rely on manufacturing capacity located in geologically unstable areas, which could affect the
availability of supplies and services.
We, like many companies in the semiconductor industry, rely on internal manufacturing capacity,
wafer fabrication foundries and other sub-contractors in geologically unstable locations around the
world. This reliance involves risks associated with the impact of earthquakes on us and the
semiconductor industry, including temporary loss of capacity, availability and cost of key raw
materials, utilities and equipment and availability of key services, including transport of our
products worldwide. Any prolonged inability to utilize one of our manufacturing facilities, or
those of our subcontractors or third-party wafer fabrication foundries, as a result of fire,
natural disaster, unavailability of utilities or otherwise, would have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and financial condition.
45
We are exposed to business, economic, political, legal and other risks through our significant
worldwide operations.
We have significant operations and manufacturing facilities outside the United States, including in
Ireland and the Philippines. During the first nine months of fiscal 2009, approximately 79% of our
revenue was derived from customers in international markets. Although we engage in hedging
transactions to reduce our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations, there can be no
assurance that our competitive position will not be adversely affected by changes in the exchange
rate of the United States dollar against other currencies. Potential interest rate increases, as
well as high energy costs, could have an adverse impact on industrial and consumer spending
patterns and could adversely impact demand for our products. While a majority of our cash is
generated outside the United States, we require a substantial amount of cash in the United Sates
for operating
requirements, stock repurchases, cash dividends and acquisitions. If we are unable to address our
U.S. cash requirements through operations, by efficient and timely repatriations of overseas cash,
through borrowings under our current credit facility or from other sources of cash obtained at an
acceptable cost (such as our recent offering of Notes), our business strategies and operating
results could be adversely affected.
In addition to being exposed to the ongoing economic cycles in the semiconductor industry, we are
also subject to the economic, political and legal risks inherent in international operations,
including the risks associated with the current crisis in global credit and financial markets,
ongoing uncertainties and political and economic instability in many countries around the world, as
well as economic disruption from acts of terrorism and the response to them by the United States
and its allies. Other business risks associated with international operations include increased
managerial complexities, air transportation disruptions, expropriation, currency controls, currency
exchange rate movement, additional costs related to foreign taxes, tariffs and freight rate
increases, exposure to different business practices and legal standards, particularly with respect
to price protection, intellectual property and environmental compliance, trade and travel
restrictions, pandemics, import and export license requirements and restrictions, difficulties in
staffing and managing worldwide operations, and accounts receivable collections.
We expect to continue to expand our business and operations in China. Our success in the Chinese
markets may be adversely affected by Chinas continuously evolving laws and regulations, including
those relating to taxation, import and export tariffs, currency controls, environmental
regulations, and property rights. Enforcement of existing laws or agreements may be inconsistent,
as there exists a high degree of fragmentation among regulatory authorities resulting in
uncertainties as to which authorities have jurisdiction over particular parties or transactions. In
addition, changes in the political environment, governmental policies or U.S.-China relations could
result in revisions to laws or regulations or their interpretation and enforcement, increased
taxation, restrictions on imports, import duties or currency revaluations, which could have an
adverse effect on our business plans and operating results.
Our operating results are dependent on the performance of independent distributors.
A significant portion of our sales are through independent distributors that are not under our
control. These independent distributors generally represent product lines offered by several
companies and thus could reduce their sales efforts applied to our products or terminate their
representation of us. We generally do not require letters of credit from our distributors and are
not protected against accounts receivable default or bankruptcy by these distributors. Our
inability to collect open accounts receivable could adversely affect our operating results.
Termination of a significant distributor, whether at our initiative or the distributors
initiative, could disrupt our current business, and if we are unable to find suitable replacements,
our operating results could be adversely affected.
We are subject to increasingly strict environmental regulations, which could increase our expenses
and affect our operating results.
Our industry is subject to increasingly strict environmental regulations that control and restrict
the use, transportation, emission, discharge, storage and disposal of certain chemicals, gases and
other substances used or produced in the semiconductor manufacturing process. Public attention on
environmental controls has continued to increase, and our customers routinely include stringent
environmental standards in their contracts with us. Changes in environmental regulations may
require us to invest in potentially costly pollution control equipment or alter the way our
products are made. In addition, we use hazardous and other regulated materials that subject us to
risks of strict liability for damages caused by accidental releases, regardless of fault. Any
failure to control such materials adequately or to comply with regulatory restrictions or
contractual obligations could increase our expenses and adversely affect our operating results.
New climate change regulations could require us to change our manufacturing processes or obtain
substitute materials that may cost more or be less available for our manufacturing operations. In
addition, new restrictions on carbon dioxide or other
46
greenhouse gas emissions could result in
significant costs for us. Greenhouse gas legislation has been introduced in Massachusetts and the
United States legislatures and we expect increased worldwide regulatory activity in the future. The
cost of complying, or of failing to comply, with these and other climate change and emissions
regulations could have an adverse effect on our business plans and operating results.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow, we may not be able to service our debt
obligations, including making payments on our $375 million senior unsecured notes.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we issued $375 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0%
notes due July 1, 2014 in a public offering. Our ability to make payments of principal and
interest on our indebtedness when due depends upon our future performance, which will be subject to
general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial, business and other factors
affecting our consolidated operations, many of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to
generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt, we may be
required, among other things:
|
|
|
to seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets; |
|
|
|
|
to refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the notes; |
|
|
|
|
to sell selected assets; |
|
|
|
|
to reduce or delay planned capital expenditures; or |
|
|
|
|
to reduce or delay planned operating expenditures. |
Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt, including the notes,
which could negatively impact our financial results. In addition, any such financing, refinancing
or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms.
Restrictions in our credit facility and outstanding debt instruments may limit our activities.
Our current credit facility and our 5.0% senior unsecured notes impose, and future debt instruments
to which we may become subject may impose, restrictions that limit our ability to engage in
activities that could otherwise benefit our company, including to undertake certain transactions,
to create certain liens on our assets and to incur certain subsidiary indebtedness. Our ability to comply with these financial restrictions and covenants is dependent on our future
performance, which is subject to prevailing economic conditions and other factors, including
factors that are beyond our control such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates, changes in
technology and changes in the level of competition. In addition, our credit facility requires us
to maintain compliance with specified financial ratios.
If we breach any of the covenants under our credit facility or the indenture governing our
outstanding notes and do not obtain appropriate waivers, then, subject to applicable cure periods,
our outstanding indebtedness thereunder could be declared immediately due and payable.
Our stock price may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock has been volatile in the past and may be volatile in the
future, as it may be significantly affected by the following factors:
|
|
|
the current crisis in global credit and financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our revenue and operating results; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts or our failure to perform in line
with those estimates or our published guidance; |
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of other semiconductor companies; |
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant new products, technical
innovations, acquisitions or dispositions, litigation or capital commitments; |
|
|
|
|
departures of key personnel; |
47
|
|
|
actual or perceived noncompliance with corporate responsibility or ethics standards by us
or any of our employees, officers or directors; and |
|
|
|
|
negative media publicity targeting us or our competitors. |
The stock market has historically experienced volatility, especially within the semiconductor
industry, that often has been unrelated to the performance of particular companies. These market
fluctuations may cause our stock price to fall regardless of our operating results.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Value of Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced Plans |
|
the Plans or |
Period |
|
(a) |
|
Paid Per Share (b) |
|
or Programs (c) |
|
Programs |
May 3, 2009 through
May 30, 2009 |
|
|
9,084 |
|
|
|
$20.74 |
|
|
|
8,780 |
|
|
|
$91,614,067 |
|
May 31, 2009 through
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$91,614,067 |
|
June 28, 2009
through
August 1, 2009 |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
$24.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$91,614,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
9,274 |
|
|
|
$20.83 |
|
|
|
8,780 |
|
|
|
$91,614,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes 494 shares surrendered to us by employees to satisfy their tax obligations
upon vesting of restricted stock granted to our employees under our equity compensation
plans. |
|
(b) |
|
The average price paid per share of stock repurchased under our stock repurchase
program includes the commissions paid to the brokers. |
|
(c) |
|
Repurchased pursuant to the stock repurchase program publicly announced on August 12,
2004. On June 6, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase by us of an
additional $1 billion of our common stock, increasing the total amount of our common stock
we are authorized to repurchase under the program to $4 billion. Under the repurchase
program, we may repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock from time to time in the
open market and through privately negotiated transactions. Unless terminated earlier by
resolution of our Board of Directors, the repurchase program will expire when we have
repurchased all shares authorized for repurchase under the repurchase program. |
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At our Special Meeting of Shareholders held on July 20, 2009, the proposal to approve an employee
stock option exchange program was acted upon by our shareholders. The results of the voting are
set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOTES |
|
VOTES |
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTENTIONS |
Proposal to
Approve an Employee
Stock Option
Exchange Program |
|
|
162,105,237 |
|
|
|
61,913,841 |
|
|
|
298,449 |
|
There were no broker non-votes on this proposal.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
|
|
Date: August 18, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Jerald G. Fishman
|
|
|
|
Jerald G. Fishman |
|
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 18, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ David A. Zinsner
|
|
|
|
David A. Zinsner |
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
49
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
1.1
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 25, 2009, between Analog Devices, Inc.
and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as representative of the several
underwriters named therein, filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819), filed with the Commission on June
30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, by and among the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A. (as Trustee) dated as of June 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated June 30, 2009, between Analog Devices, Inc.
and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819),
filed with the Commission on June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Form of 5.00% Global Note due July 1, 2014, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819), filed with the
Commission on June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Second Amendment to 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of Analog Devices, Inc. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Chief Executive Officer). |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Chief Financial Officer). |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Schema Document. |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. |
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months
ended August 1, 2009 and August 2, 2008, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at August 1,
2009 and November 1, 2008, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine
months ended August 1, 2009 and August 2, 2008 and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus
for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for purposes of
section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
50