sv4
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 21, 2010
Registration
No. 333-[ ]
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form S-4
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
Comtech Telecommunications
Corp.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
3663
|
|
11-2139466
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)
68 South Service Road, Suite 230
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
Melville, New York 11747
(631) 962-7000
|
|
|
(Address, Including Zip Code, and
Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrants
Principal Executive Offices)
Mr. Fred Kornberg
Comtech Telecommunications
Corp.
68 South Service Road,
Suite 230
Melville, New York
11747
(631) 962-7000
(Name, Address, Including Zip
Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent For
Service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey W. Tindell, Esq.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Four Times Square
New York, New York 10036
(212) 735-3000
|
|
Robert A. Cantone, Esq.
Proskauer Rose, LLP
1585 Broadway
New York, New York 10036
(212) 969-3235
|
|
Richard C. Wirthlin, Esq.
Irell & Manella LLP
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
Los Angeles, California 90067
(310) 277-1010
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this registration statement and the effective
time of the merger of Angels Acquisition Corp. (Merger
Sub), a wholly owned subsidiary of Comtech
Telecommunications Corp. (Comtech), with and into
CPI International, Inc. (CPI), as described in the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 8, 2010 among
CPI, Comtech and Merger Sub.
If the securities being registered on this form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), check the
following box and list the Securities Act registration statement
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the
same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the
appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this
transaction:
Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender
Offer) o
Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender
Offer) o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION
FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Of Each Class
|
|
|
Amount To Be
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount Of
|
Of Securities To Be Registered
|
|
|
Registered(1)
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering Price(2)
|
|
|
Registration Fee(3)
|
Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share
|
|
|
4,406,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$87,607,514
|
|
|
$6,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the maximum number of
shares of common stock of Comtech estimated to be issuable upon
completion of the merger described in this proxy
statement/prospectus, based on the number of shares of CPI
common stock issued and outstanding on June 16, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the registration fee required by Section 6(b)
of the Securities Act and calculated pursuant to
Rules 457(f)(1) and 457(c) under the Securities Act. The
proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the
registrants common stock was calculated based upon the
market value of shares of CPI common stock (the securities to be
canceled in the merger) in accordance with Rule 457(c) and
is equal to (a) the product of (i) $15.76, the average of
the high and low prices per share of CPI common stock on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market Exchange on June 15, 2010,
multiplied by (ii) 16,788,992, the maximum number of shares of
CPI common stock that may be canceled and exchanged in the
merger as of June 16, 2010, less (b) $176,987,000, the
aggregate amount of cash consideration expected to be paid by
Comtech in the merger pursuant to Rule 457(f)(3).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Calculated pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Securities Act and SEC Fee Advisory #4
for Fiscal Year 2010 at a rate equal to $71.30 per $1,000,000 of
the proposed maximum aggregate offering price.
|
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act or until the registration statement shall
become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant
to said Section 8(a), may determine.
Information
contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A
registration statement relating to these securities has been
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These
securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted
prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective.
This proxy statement/prospectus shall not constitute an offer to
sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be
any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such
offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.
|
PRELIMINARY
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED JUNE 21,
2010
MERGER
PROPOSAL YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
[l],
2010
Dear CPI International, Inc. Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend our upcoming special meeting
of stockholders of CPI International, Inc., referred to as CPI,
to be held on
[l],
2010 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at
[l].
As announced on May 10, 2010, CPI, Comtech
Telecommunications, Inc., referred to as Comtech, and Angels
Acquisition Corp. entered into an agreement and plan of merger,
dated May 8, 2010, which provides for a merger in which CPI
will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Comtech. The CPI board
of directors has unanimously determined that the merger and the
merger agreement are advisable and in the best interests of CPI
and its stockholders and has approved the merger agreement and
the merger.
If the merger is completed, each outstanding share of CPI common
stock will be converted into the right to receive a combination
of $9.00 in cash, without interest, and a fraction of a share of
Comtech common stock equal to the conversion ratio. The
conversion ratio will equal $8.10 divided by the average closing
trading price of Comtech common stock over a specified period
prior to the closing of the merger, but will not be greater than
0.2382 nor less than 0.2132.
The common stock of CPI and common stock of Comtech are each
traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbols
CPII and CMTL, respectively.
CPI is holding the special meeting of stockholders to obtain
your vote to adopt the merger agreement. Your vote is important.
The merger cannot be completed unless the holders of a majority
of the shares of CPI common stock outstanding and entitled to
vote affirmatively vote for the adoption of the merger agreement
at the special meeting. As described in the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus, Cypress Associates II LLC and certain
of its affiliates have entered into a voting and standstill
agreement under which, subject to limited exceptions, they have
agreed to vote shares representing 49.9% of the outstanding
shares of CPI common stock as of the record date for the special
meeting in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement.
The CPI board of directors unanimously recommends that CPI
stockholders vote FOR the adoption of the merger
agreement.
On behalf of the CPI board of directors, you are invited to
attend the special meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend
the CPI special meeting in person, you are urged to submit your
proxy as promptly as possible through one of the delivery
methods described in the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus. In addition, you are urged to read
carefully the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus (and the
documents incorporated by reference into the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus), which includes important information
about the merger agreement, the proposed merger, CPI, Comtech
and the special meeting. Please pay particular attention to
the section titled Risk Factors beginning on
page [l]
of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.
On behalf of the CPI board of directors, thank you for your
continued support.
|
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Targoff
|
|
O. Joe Caldarelli
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
securities to be issued under the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus or determined that the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation
to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The accompanying proxy statement/prospectus is dated
[l],
2010 and is first being mailed to the stockholders of CPI on or
about
[l],
2010.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
The accompanying document is the proxy statement of CPI for its
special meeting of stockholders and the prospectus of Comtech
for the shares of Comtech common stock to be issued as
consideration in the merger. The accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus incorporates important business and
financial information about Comtech and CPI from documents that
are not included in or delivered with the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus. This information is available to you
without charge upon your written or oral request. You can obtain
documents incorporated by reference into the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from Comtech or CPI at the following addresses and
telephone numbers:
|
|
|
Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
68 South Service Road, Suite 230
Melville, New York 11747
Attention: Investor Relations
(631) 962-7000
|
|
CPI International, Inc.
811 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, California 94303
Attention: Investor Relations
(650) 846-2900
|
In addition, if you have questions about the merger or the
accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, would like additional
copies of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus or need to
obtain proxy cards or other information related to the proxy
solicitation, please contact CPI Investor Relations at
(650) 846-2900.
You will not be charged for any of these documents that you
request.
If you would like to request documents, please do so by
[l],
2010 in order to receive them before the special meeting.
See Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page
[l]
of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus for further
information.
811
Hansen Way
Palo Alto, California 94303
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of CPI International, Inc.:
Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of stockholders of
CPI International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which is
referred to as CPI, will be held on
[l],
2010 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at
[l],
solely for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
To consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of May 8, 2010 (as it may be
amended from time to time), among Comtech Telecommunications
Corp., which is referred to as Comtech, Angels Acquisition
Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Comtech, and CPI. A copy of
the Agreement and Plan of Merger is attached as Annex A to
the proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice; and
|
|
|
|
To approve the adjournment of the CPI special meeting if
necessary to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of
the special meeting.
|
These items of business, including the merger agreement and the
proposed merger, are described in detail in the accompanying
proxy statement/prospectus. The CPI board of directors has
determined that the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, are
advisable and in the best interests of CPI and its stockholders
and recommends that CPI stockholders vote FOR the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement and FOR the
adjournment of the CPI special meeting if necessary to solicit
additional proxies in favor of such adoption.
Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on
[l],
2010 are entitled to notice of the CPI special meeting and to
vote at the CPI special meeting or at any adjournment thereof. A
list of stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting
will be available in CPIs offices located at 811 Hansen
Way, Palo Alto, California 94303, during regular business hours
for a period of no less than 10 days before the special
meeting, as well as at the place of the special meeting during
the meeting.
Adoption of the merger agreement by the CPI stockholders is a
condition to the merger and requires the affirmative vote of
holders of a majority of the shares of CPI common stock
outstanding and entitled to vote thereon. Therefore, your vote
is very important. Your failure to vote your shares will have
the same effect as a vote AGAINST the adoption of
the merger agreement.
By order of the board of directors,
Joel Littman
Corporate Secretary
Palo Alto, California
[l],
2010
YOUR VOTE
IS IMPORTANT!
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE CPI SPECIAL MEETING
IN PERSON, WE URGE YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS
POSSIBLE (I) THROUGH THE INTERNET, (II) BY TELEPHONE
OR (III) BY MARKING, SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY
CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
You may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time
before the CPI special meeting. If your shares are held in the
name of a bank, broker or other fiduciary, please follow the
instructions on the voting instruction card furnished to you by
such record holder.
You are urged to read the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus, including all documents incorporated by
reference into the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, and
its annexes carefully and in their entirety. If you have any
questions concerning the merger, the special meeting or the
accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, would like additional
copies of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus or need
help voting your shares of CPI common stock, please contact CPI
Investor Relations at:
CPI
International, Inc.
811 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, California 94303
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone:
(650) 846-2900
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
ii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETING
The following are some questions that you, as a stockholder
of CPI, may have regarding the merger and the special meeting,
and brief answers to those questions. You are urged to read this
proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents referred to
in this proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in their
entirety because this section may not provide all of the
information that is important to you with respect to the merger
and the special meeting. Additional important information is
contained in the annexes to, and the documents incorporated by
reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving this document? |
|
A: |
|
Comtech and CPI have agreed to a merger, pursuant to which CPI
will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Comtech and will cease
to be a publicly held corporation. In order for the companies to
complete the merger, the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of CPI common stock must vote to adopt the
merger agreement, and CPI is holding a special meeting of
stockholders solely to obtain such stockholder approval. In the
merger, in addition to the payment of cash, Comtech will issue
shares of Comtech common stock as the consideration to be paid
to holders of CPI common stock. |
|
|
|
This document is being delivered to you as both a proxy
statement of CPI and a prospectus of Comtech in connection with
the merger. It is the proxy statement by which the CPI board of
directors is soliciting proxies from you to vote on the adoption
of the merger agreement at the special meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. It is also
the prospectus by which Comtech will issue Comtech common stock
to you in the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What am I being asked to vote on? |
|
A: |
|
CPI stockholders are being asked to vote on the following
proposals: |
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt the merger agreement between Comtech and CPI, a copy of
which is attached as Annex A to this proxy
statement/prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary,
to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes
to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement by
CPI stockholders is a condition to the obligations of CPI and
Comtech to complete the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
In the merger, Angels Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Comtech that was formed for the purpose of the
merger, will be merged with and into CPI. CPI will be the
surviving corporation in the merger and will be a wholly owned
subsidiary of Comtech following completion of the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
If the merger is completed, each of your shares of CPI common
stock will be cancelled and converted automatically into the
right to receive $9.00 in cash and between 0.2132 and
0.2382 shares of Comtech common stock (and dividends, if
any, on Comtech common stock with a record date after the date
of the merger agreement and before the effective time of the
merger). The exact number of shares of Comtech common stock to
be received in the merger will be determined based on a
conversion ratio (rounded to four decimal places) equal to $8.10
divided by the average closing price of Comtechs stock
over the five consecutive trading days ending on (and including)
the second trading day prior to closing, provided that if such
average closing price of Comtech common stock is greater than
$38.00, then the conversion ratio will equal 0.2132, and if such
average closing sale price is less than $34.00, then the
conversion ratio will equal 0.2382. CPI stockholders will
receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Comtech common
stock that they would otherwise receive in the merger. |
|
|
|
Using only the closing price of $31.06 for Comtech common stock
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on May 7, 2010, the last
trading day before the public announcement of the merger
agreement, the merger consideration represented approximately
$16.40 in value for each share of CPI common stock. Based on the
closing price of
$[l]
for Comtech common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
on
[l],
2010, the most |
1
|
|
|
|
|
recent practicable trading day prior to the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus, the conversion ratio was
[l],
and the merger consideration represented approximately
$[l]
in value for each share of CPI common stock. See Risk
Factors beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
Q: |
|
How did you determine the merger consideration to be paid
to holders of CPI common stock? |
|
A: |
|
The merger consideration was determined as a result of
arms length negotiations between CPIs board of
directors, on the one hand, and the management of Comtech and
its board of directors, on the other hand. |
|
Q: |
|
Why are you proposing the merger? |
|
A: |
|
For a discussion of CPIs reasons for the merger, you are
urged to read the information under The Merger
CPIs Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the CPI
Board of Directors beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. For a discussion of
Comtechs reasons for the merger, you are urged to read the
information under The Merger Comtechs
Reasons for the Merger beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens if the merger is not completed? |
|
A: |
|
If the merger agreement is not adopted by CPI stockholders or if
the merger is not completed for any other reason, you will not
receive any payment for your shares of CPI common stock in
connection with the merger. Instead, CPI will remain an
independent public company and its common stock will continue to
be listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. If the
merger agreement is terminated under specified circumstances,
CPI may be required to pay Comtech a termination fee of
$12 million and, in some cases, liquidated damages of
$15 million, as described under The Merger
Agreement Termination of the Merger
Agreement Termination Fee Payable by CPI
beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
Q: |
|
Does CPIs board of directors recommend that
stockholders adopt the merger agreement? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The CPI board of directors has unanimously determined that
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the merger, are advisable and in the
best interests of CPI and its stockholders. Therefore, the CPI
board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement at the special meeting. See The
Merger CPIs Reasons for the Merger;
Recommendation of the CPI Board of Directors beginning on
page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
Q: |
|
What stockholder vote is required for the approval of each
proposal? |
|
A: |
|
The following are the vote requirements for the proposals: |
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of the Merger Agreement: Once a
quorum has been established, the affirmative vote of holders of
a majority of the shares of CPI common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote on the proposal. Accordingly, abstentions,
broker non-votes and unvoted shares will have the same effect as
votes AGAINST adoption.
|
|
|
|
Adjournment (if necessary): Whether or not a
quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes present in person or by proxy.
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum for the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
A majority in voting power of all of the outstanding shares of
CPI common stock entitled to vote at the meeting being present
in person or represented by proxy constitutes a quorum for the
special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
When is this proxy statement/prospectus being
mailed? |
|
A: |
|
This proxy statement/prospectus and the proxy card are first
being sent to CPI stockholders on or near
[l],
2010. |
2
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
All holders of CPI common stock who held shares at the close of
business on the record date for the special meeting
([l],
2010) are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
special meeting, provided that such shares remain outstanding on
the date of the special meeting. As of the close of business on
the record date, there were
[l] shares
of CPI common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the
special meeting. Each share of CPI common stock is entitled to
one vote. |
|
Q: |
|
Are any CPI stockholders already committed to vote in
favor of the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Pursuant to a voting and standstill agreement entered into
concurrently with the merger agreement, Cypress
Associates II LLC and certain of its affiliates, which are
referred to as the Cypress Group stockholders in this proxy
statement/prospectus, have, subject to certain exceptions,
agreed to vote 49.9% of the outstanding shares of CPI common
stock in favor of the merger. Under certain circumstances, if
the CPI board of directors changes its recommendation with
respect to the merger, the Cypress Group stockholders will be
required to vote only 25% of the outstanding shares of CPI
common stock in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement.
In addition, the voting and standstill agreement will terminate
automatically upon the termination of the merger agreement. For
a more complete description of the voting and standstill
agreement, see The Voting and Standstill Agreement
beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. The voting and
standstill agreement is also attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex B. |
|
Q: |
|
When and where is the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The special meeting will be held at
[l]
on
[l],
2010 at 10:00 a.m., local time. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote my shares at the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
If you are entitled to vote at the CPI special meeting and you
hold your shares in your own name, you can submit a proxy or
vote in person by completing a ballot at the special meeting.
However, CPI encourages you to submit a proxy before the special
meeting even if you plan to attend the special meeting. A proxy
is a legal designation of another person to vote your shares of
CPI common stock on your behalf. If you hold shares in your own
name, you may submit a proxy for your shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
telephonically by calling
[l]
and following the instructions when prompted;
|
|
|
|
electronically via the Internet at
www.[l]
and following the instructions provided to you; or
|
|
|
|
by filling out, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and
mailing it in the pre-paid envelope included with these proxy
materials.
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker automatically vote my shares for
me? |
|
A: |
|
No. If your shares are held in an account at a broker or
through another nominee, you must instruct the broker or other
nominee on how to vote your shares by following the instructions
that the broker or other nominee provides to you with these
materials. Most brokers offer the ability for stockholders to
submit voting instructions by mail by completing a voting
instruction card, by telephone or via the Internet. |
|
|
|
Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement. The broker may still
register your shares as being present at the special meeting for
purposes of determining a quorum but without your specific
authorization, your shares will not be voted in favor of the
merger or on any other matters over which brokers lack
discretionary authority. This is called a broker non-vote. A
broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST adoption of the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
If your shares are held in an account at a broker or through
another nominee, you must instruct the broker or other nominee
on how to vote your shares by following the instructions that
the broker or other nominee provides to you with these
materials. Most brokers offer the ability for stockholders to
submit voting instructions by mail by completing a voting
instruction card, by telephone or via the Internet. |
3
|
|
|
|
|
If you hold shares through a broker or other nominee and wish to
vote your shares in person at the special meeting, you must
obtain a proxy from your broker or other nominee and present it
to the inspector of election with your ballot when you vote at
the special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
How will my shares be represented at the special
meeting? |
|
A: |
|
If you submit your proxy by telephone, the Internet or by
signing and returning your proxy card, the officers named in
your proxy card will vote your shares in the manner you
requested if you correctly submitted your proxy. If you sign
your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would
like to vote your shares, your proxy will be voted as the CPI
board of directors recommends, which is: |
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the adoption of the merger
agreement; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the approval of the adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if
there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at
the time of the special meeting.
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who may attend the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
CPI stockholders (or their authorized representatives) and
CPIs invited guests may attend the special meeting.
Stockholders may call CPI Investor Relations at
(650) 846-2900
to obtain directions to the location of the special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
Is my vote important? |
|
A: |
|
Yes, your vote is very important. If you do not submit a proxy
or vote in person at the special meeting, it will be more
difficult for CPI to obtain the necessary quorum to hold the
special meeting. In addition, an abstention or your failure to
submit a proxy or to vote in person, or, if your shares are held
in an account at a broker or through another nominee, your
failure to instruct the broker or other nominee on how to vote
your shares, will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the adoption of the merger agreement.
The CPI board of directors recommends that you vote
FOR the adoption of the merger agreement. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I revoke my proxy or change my voting
instructions? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may revoke your proxy and/or change your vote at any
time before your proxy is voted at the special meeting. If you
are a stockholder of record, you can do this by: |
|
|
|
|
|
sending a written notice stating that you revoke your proxy to
CPI at 811 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, California 94303, Attention:
Corporate Secretary, that bears a date later than the date of
the proxy and is received prior to the special meeting;
|
|
|
|
submitting a valid, later-dated proxy by mail, telephone or
Internet that is received prior to the special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting by ballot in person
(your attendance at the special meeting will not, by itself,
revoke any proxy that you have previously given).
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you hold your shares through a broker or other nominee, you
must contact your broker or other nominee to change your vote or
obtain a legal proxy to vote your shares if you wish
to cast your vote in person at the meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens if I sell my shares after the record date but
before the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The record date for the special meeting is earlier than the date
of the special meeting and the date that the merger is expected
to be completed. If you sell or otherwise transfer your CPI
shares after the record date but before the date of the special
meeting, you will retain your right to vote at the special
meeting. However, you will not have the right to receive the
merger consideration to be received by CPI stockholders in the
merger. In order to receive the merger consideration, you must
hold your shares through completion of the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I do if I receive more than one set of voting
materials? |
|
A: |
|
You may receive more than one set of voting materials for the
special meeting, including multiple copies of this proxy
statement/prospectus, proxy cards and voting instruction forms.
This can occur if you hold your shares in |
4
|
|
|
|
|
more than one brokerage account, if you hold shares directly as
a record holder and also in street name, or
otherwise through a nominee, and in certain other circumstances.
If you receive more than one set of voting materials, each
should be voted and/or returned separately in order to ensure
that all of your shares are voted. |
|
Q: |
|
Am I entitled to appraisal rights if I do not vote or if I
vote against the adoption of the merger agreement? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Under Delaware law, if the merger is completed, record
holders of CPI common stock who do not vote in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement and who otherwise properly
assert their appraisal rights will be entitled to seek appraisal
and obtain payment in cash for the judicially determined fair
value of their shares of CPI common stock, in lieu of receiving
the merger consideration. This value could be more than, the
same as, or less than the value of the merger consideration. To
exercise your appraisal rights, you must strictly follow the
procedures described by Delaware law. Due to the complexity of
these procedures, CPI stockholders who are considering
exercising such rights are encouraged to seek the advice of
legal counsel. These procedures are summarized under the
heading, The Merger Appraisal Rights,
beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, the text of
the applicable provisions of Delaware law is included as
Annex C to this proxy statement/prospectus. Failure to
strictly comply with these provisions will result in loss of the
right of appraisal. |
|
Q: |
|
Is completion of the merger subject to any
conditions? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. In addition to the adoption of the merger agreement by CPI
stockholders, completion of the merger requires the receipt of
the necessary governmental and regulatory approvals and the
satisfaction or, to the extent permitted by applicable law,
waiver of the other conditions specified in the merger agreement. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the merger? |
|
A: |
|
CPI and Comtech are working towards completing the merger
promptly. The consummation of the merger is subject to, among
other things, receipt of CPI stockholder approval, governmental
and regulatory approvals and other usual and customary closing
conditions. As a result, no assurance can be given as to when,
or if, the merger will occur. |
|
Q: |
|
Is the transaction expected to be taxable to CPI
stockholders? |
|
A: |
|
The merger generally will be a taxable transaction, and U.S.
holders will generally recognize gain or loss in an amount equal
to the difference, if any, between (i) the sum of any cash
received (including cash received in lieu of a fractional share
of Comtech common stock) and the fair market value, as of the
effective time of the merger, of the shares of Comtech common
stock received by such holder in the exchange and (ii) such
holders tax basis in the shares of CPI common stock
exchanged therefor. |
|
|
|
CPI stockholders are urged to consult their tax advisors as to
the specific tax consequences to them of the merger, including
the applicability and effect of U.S. federal, state, local and
foreign income and other tax laws in their particular
circumstances. |
|
|
|
Additional information is provided under The
Merger Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Merger beginning on page
[l]. |
|
Q: |
|
As a CPI stockholder, what risks should I consider in
deciding whether to vote in favor of the merger? |
|
A: |
|
You should carefully review the section of this proxy
statement/prospectus entitled Risk Factors beginning
on page
[l],
which sets forth and incorporates by reference certain risks and
uncertainties related to the merger, certain risks and
uncertainties to which the combined companys business will
be subject, and certain risks and uncertainties to which each of
CPI and Comtech, as an independent company, is subject. |
5
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
Carefully read and consider the information contained in and
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus,
including its annexes. Then, please vote your shares of CPI
common stock, which you may do by: |
|
|
|
|
|
completing, dating, signing and returning the enclosed proxy
card in the accompanying postage-paid envelope;
|
|
|
|
submitting your proxy by telephone or via the Internet by
following the instructions included on your proxy card; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting by ballot in person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you hold shares through a broker or other nominee, please
instruct your broker or nominee to vote your shares by following
the instructions that the broker or nominee provides to you with
these materials. |
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my stock certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. CPI stockholders should not send in their stock
certificates at this time. After completion of the merger,
Comtechs exchange agent will send you a letter of
transmittal and instructions for exchanging your shares of CPI
common stock for the merger consideration. Unless you
specifically request to receive Comtech common stock
certificates, the shares of Comtech common stock you receive in
the merger will be issued in book-entry form. |
|
Q: |
|
Whom should I contact with questions? |
|
A: |
|
If you have any questions about the merger or the special
meeting or would like to obtain additional copies of this proxy
statement/prospectus, proxy cards or voting instruction forms,
you may contact CPI by mail at CPI International, Inc., 811
Hansen Way, Palo Alto, California 94303, Attention: Investor
Relations, or by phone at
(650) 846-2900. |
6
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this proxy
statement/prospectus. It may not contain all of the information
that is important to you. Moreover, this summary is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the more detailed information
contained elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus including
the annexes attached hereto, and incorporated by reference
herein. You are urged to read carefully this entire proxy
statement/prospectus and the other documents referred to in this
proxy statement/prospectus in order to fully understand the
merger agreement, the voting and standstill agreement and the
proposed merger. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. Each item in this
summary refers to the page of this proxy statement/prospectus on
which that subject is discussed in more detail.
Information
about Comtech Telecommunications Corp., Angels Acquisition Corp.
and CPI International, Inc. (See
Page [l])
Comtech
Telecommunications Corp.
Comtech Telecommunications Corp., which is referred to in this
proxy statement/prospectus as Comtech, designs, develops,
produces and markets innovative products, systems and services
for advanced communications solutions. Comtech believes many of
its solutions play a vital role in providing or enhancing
communication capabilities when terrestrial communications
infrastructure is unavailable, inefficient or too expensive.
Comtech conducts business through three complementary segments:
telecommunications transmission, mobile data communications and
RF microwave amplifiers. Comtech sells products to a diverse
customer base in the global commercial and government
communications markets. Comtech believes it is a leader in the
market segments that it serves.
The principal trading market for Comtechs common stock
(NASDAQGS: CMTL) is the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
The principal executive offices of Comtech are located at 68
South Service Road, Suite 230, Melville, New York 11747;
its telephone number is
(631) 962-7000;
and its web site is www.comtechtel.com.
Angels
Acquisition Corp.
Angels Acquisition Corp., which is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as Merger Sub, is a Delaware corporation
and a wholly owned subsidiary of Comtech. Merger Sub was formed
solely for the purpose of consummating the merger. Merger Sub
has not carried on any activities to date, except for activities
incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in
connection with the merger.
The principal executive offices of Merger Sub are located at 68
South Service Road, Suite 230, Melville, New York 11747,
and its telephone number is
(631) 962-7000.
CPI
International, Inc.
CPI International, Inc., which is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as CPI, is the parent company of
Communications & Power Industries, Inc., a leading
provider of microwave, radio frequency, power and control
solutions for critical defense, communications, medical,
scientific and other applications. Communications &
Power Industries, Inc. develops, manufactures and distributes
products used to generate, amplify, transmit and receive
high-power/high-frequency microwave and radio frequency signals
and/or
provide power and control for various applications. End-use
applications of these systems include the transmission of radar
signals for navigation and location; transmission of deception
signals for electronic countermeasures; transmission and
amplification of voice, data and video signals for broadcasting,
Internet and other types of commercial and military
communications; providing power and control for medical
diagnostic imaging; and generating microwave energy for
radiation therapy in the treatment of cancer and for various
industrial and scientific applications.
The principal trading market for CPIs common stock
(NASDAQGS: CPII) is the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
7
The principal executive offices of CPI are located at 811 Hansen
Way, Palo Alto, California 94303; its telephone number is
(650) 846-2900;
and its web site is www.cpii.com.
The
Merger (See
Page [l])
Comtech, Merger Sub and CPI have entered into the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of May 8, 2010, which, as it may
be amended from time to time, is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the merger agreement. Subject to the
terms and conditions of the merger agreement and in accordance
with Delaware law, Merger Sub will be merged with and into CPI,
with CPI continuing as the surviving corporation. Upon
completion of this transaction, which is referred to in this
proxy statement/prospectus as the merger, CPI will be a wholly
owned subsidiary of Comtech, and CPI common stock will no longer
be outstanding or publicly traded.
A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to
this proxy statement/prospectus. You should read the merger
agreement carefully because it is the legal document that
governs the merger.
Special
Meeting of CPI Stockholders (See
Page [l])
Meeting
The special meeting will be held at
[l],
on
[l],
2010 at 10:00 a.m., local time. At the special meeting, CPI
stockholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary,
to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes
to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting.
|
Record
Date
Only CPI stockholders of record at the close of business on
[l],
2010 will be entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
special meeting or any adjournment of the special meeting. As of
the close of business on the record date of
[l],
2010, there were
[l] shares
of CPI common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the
special meeting. Each holder of CPI common stock is entitled to
one vote for each share of CPI common stock owned as of the
record date.
Required
Vote
To adopt the merger agreement, holders of a majority of the
shares of CPI common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on
the proposal must vote in favor of adoption of the merger
agreement. CPI cannot complete the merger unless its
stockholders adopt the merger agreement. Because approval is
based on the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding
shares of CPI common stock entitled to vote thereon, a CPI
stockholders failure to vote, an abstention from voting or
the failure of a CPI stockholder who holds his or her shares in
street name through a broker or other nominee to
give voting instructions to such broker or other nominee will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST adoption of
the merger agreement.
If there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement
at the time of the special meeting, a majority of the votes
present in person or by proxy (whether or not a quorum is
present) may adjourn the meeting to another time and place in
order to solicit additional proxies. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adjourn the special meeting.
Shares not in attendance at the special meeting will have no
effect on the outcome of any vote to adjourn the special meeting.
See The Voting and Standstill Agreement
below for information regarding CPI stockholders who have
committed to vote shares of CPI common stock in favor of the two
proposals described above, subject to certain exceptions.
Stock
Ownership of and Voting by CPIs Directors and Executive
Officers
At the close of business on the record date for the special
meeting, CPIs directors and executive officers and their
affiliates beneficially owned
[l] shares
of CPI common stock, and have the right to vote
[l]
of those shares at
8
the special meeting, which represents approximately
[l]%
of the shares of CPI common stock entitled to vote at the
special meeting.
Except with respect to the shares held by entities affiliated
with CPI director Jeffrey Hughes, none of the directors or
executive officers of CPI has entered into any agreement
requiring them to vote for or against the merger proposal. See
The Voting and Standstill Agreement
below for information regarding CPI stockholders who have
committed to vote shares of CPI common stock in favor of the two
proposals described above.
What CPI
Stockholders Will Receive in the Merger (See
Page [l])
If the merger is completed, each share of CPI common stock will
be cancelled and converted automatically into the right to
receive $9.00 in cash and between 0.2132 and 0.2382 shares
of Comtech common stock (and dividends, if any, on Comtech
common stock with a record date after the date of the merger
agreement and before the effective time of the merger). The
exact number of shares of Comtech common stock to be received in
the merger will be determined based on a conversion ratio
(rounded to four decimal places) equal to $8.10 divided by the
average closing price of Comtechs stock over the five
consecutive trading days ending on (and including) the second
trading day prior to closing, provided that if such average
closing price of Comtech common stock is greater than $38.00,
then the conversion ratio will equal 0.2132, and if such average
closing sale price is less than $34.00, then the conversion
ratio will equal 0.2382. The fraction of a share of Comtech
common stock delivered in respect of each share of CPI common
stock in the merger is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the conversion ratio. Comtech will not
issue any fractional shares of its common stock in the merger.
Instead, the total number of shares of Comtech common stock that
each CPI stockholder will receive in the merger will be rounded
down to the nearest whole number, and each CPI stockholder will
receive cash, without interest, for any fractional shares of
Comtech common stock that he or she would otherwise receive in
the merger. The amount of cash for fractional shares will be
based on the prevailing prices at which Comtech common stock
will be sold on the NASDAQ Global Select Market by
Comtechs exchange agent as soon as practicable after the
effective time of the merger. The Comtech common stock received
based on the conversion ratio, together with the cash
consideration (including any cash received in lieu of fractional
shares and dividends, if any, on Comtech common stock with a
record date after the date of the merger agreement and before
the effective time of the merger), is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the merger consideration. Below are
three illustrative examples of the merger consideration that a
CPI stockholder will receive depending on different per-share
prices of Comtech common stock:
Example 1: If at closing you own 100 shares
of CPI common stock and the average closing price of
Comtechs shares over the five consecutive trading days
ending on (and including) the second trading day prior to
closing is $36.00, you will be entitled to receive
22 shares of Comtech common stock, $900 in cash and an
additional amount of cash in respect of 0.50 shares of
Comtech common stock at the prevailing sale price of a share of
Comtech common stock as soon as practicable after closing.
Example 2: If at closing you own 100 shares
of CPI common stock and the average closing price of
Comtechs shares over the five consecutive trading days
ending on (and including) the second trading day prior to
closing is $30.00, you will be entitled to receive
23 shares of Comtech common stock, $900 in cash and an
additional amount of cash in respect of 0.82 shares of
Comtech common stock at the prevailing sale price of a share of
Comtech common stock as soon as practicable after closing.
Example 3: If at closing you own 100 shares
of CPI common stock and the average closing price of
Comtechs shares over the five consecutive trading days
ending on (and including) the second trading day prior to
closing is $42.00, you will be entitled to receive
21 shares of Comtech common stock, $900 in cash and an
additional amount of cash in respect of 0.32 shares of
Comtech common stock at the prevailing sale price of a share of
Comtech common stock as soon as practicable after closing.
Using only the closing price of $31.06 for Comtech common stock
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on May 7, 2010, the last
trading day before the public announcement of the merger
agreement, the merger consideration represented approximately
$16.40 in value for each share of CPI common stock. Based on the
closing price of
$[l]
for Comtech common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
on
[l],
2010, the most recent practicable trading day prior to the date
of this proxy statement/prospectus, the merger consideration
represented approximately
$[l]
in value for each share of CPI common stock.
9
Treatment
of Equity Awards (See
Page [l])
Each option to purchase shares of CPI common stock that were
granted under CPIs equity compensation plans and are
outstanding immediately prior to the closing, whether or not
exercisable or vested, will be canceled at the closing in
exchange for cash, equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the
sum of (A) $9.00 and (B) the average per-share closing
prices of Comtech common stock for the 10 consecutive trading
days immediately preceding the date that is two days before the
closing, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market,
multiplied by the conversion ratio, reduced by (ii) the
per-share exercise price of such option.
Each restricted stock award and restricted stock unit granted
under CPIs equity compensation plans outstanding
immediately prior to the closing will be canceled at the closing
in exchange for a payment, in cash, equal to the sum of
(i) $9.00 and (ii) the average per-share closing
prices of Comtech common stock for the 10 consecutive trading
days immediately preceding the date that is two days before the
closing, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market,
multiplied by the conversion ratio.
Recommendation
of the CPI Board of Directors (See
Page [l])
The CPI board of directors has unanimously determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger, are advisable and in the best interests of
CPI and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that you
vote FOR the adoption of the agreement and
FOR the adjournment of the special meeting,
if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of
the special meeting.
Opinion
of CPIs Financial Advisors (See
Page [l])
In connection with the merger, CPIs financial advisor,
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., referred to as
J.P. Morgan in this proxy statement/prospectus, delivered
its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, to the CPI
board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, as of the date of such opinion, and based upon and subject
to the various factors, assumptions and limitations set forth in
such written opinion, of the per share merger consideration to
be received by the holders of CPI common stock (other than the
Cypress Group and its affiliates) in the proposed merger. The
full text of J.P. Morgans written opinion, dated
May 7, 2010, is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus
as Annex D and sets forth, among other things, the
procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and
limitations on the scope of review undertaken.
In connection with the merger, CPI engaged Moelis &
Company LLC, referred to as Moelis in this proxy
statement/prospectus, to act as financial advisor to the special
committee of CPIs board of directors. Moelis delivered its
oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, to the special
committee of the CPI board of directors as to the fairness, from
a financial point of view, as of the date of such opinion, and
based upon and subject to the various factors, assumptions,
limitations and qualifications set forth in such opinion, of the
per share merger consideration to be received by CPIs
stockholders (other than the Cypress Group and its affiliates)
pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in
the merger agreement. The full text of Moelis written
opinion, dated May 7, 2010, is attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex E and sets forth, among other
things, the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters
considered and limitations on the scope of review undertaken.
The opinions of J.P. Morgan and Moelis are directed to
the board of directors of CPI and the special committee of the
CPI board of directors, respectively, and each opinion addresses
only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
consideration to be paid to the holders of common stock of CPI
(other than the Cypress Group stockholders) in the proposed
merger, and does not address any other aspect of the merger. The
opinions of J.P. Morgan and Moelis do not constitute a
recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote with
respect to the proposed merger.
Ownership
of Comtech After the Merger (See
Page [l])
Based on the number of shares of CPI common stock outstanding as
of
[l],
2010, Comtech expects to issue approximately
[l] shares
of its common stock to CPI stockholders pursuant to the merger.
The actual number of shares of Comtech common stock to be issued
pursuant to the merger will be determined at the completion of
the
10
merger based on the conversion ratio then in effect and the
number of shares of CPI common stock outstanding at such time.
Immediately after completion of the merger, it is expected that
former CPI stockholders will own approximately
[l]%
of the
[l]
then outstanding shares of Comtech common stock, based on
the number of shares of CPI and Comtech common stock
outstanding, on a fully diluted basis, as of
[l],
2010.
Comtech
Stockholder Approval Is Not Required
Comtech stockholders are not required to adopt the merger
agreement or approve the merger or the issuance of the shares of
Comtech common stock in connection with the merger.
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger (See
Page [l])
In considering the recommendation of the CPI board of directors
with respect to the merger agreement, CPI stockholders should be
aware that the executive officers of CPI and certain members of
the CPI board of directors have interests in the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement that are different from, or
in addition to, the interests of CPI stockholders generally.
These interests include certain CPI executive officers being
entitled to receive specified severance and other benefits
following the effective time of the merger. The CPI board of
directors was aware of these interests, and considered them,
among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the merger
agreement and the merger, and in recommending that CPI
stockholders adopt the merger agreement.
Comtech is presently in negotiations with CPIs executive
officers regarding the terms of their continued employment and
the treatment of their existing equity awards, and, if no such
agreement is reached, some or all of the executive officers
might not continue with the surviving company or its
subsidiaries in their current capacity or otherwise.
Listing
of Comtech Common Stock and Delisting and Deregistration of CPI
Common Stock (See
Page [l])
Comtech will use reasonable best efforts to cause the shares of
Comtech common stock to be issued in connection with the merger
to be approved for listing on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
(where Comtech common stock is currently listed), subject to
official notice of issuance. If the merger is completed, CPI
shares will no longer be listed on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market, and will be deregistered under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, which is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the Exchange Act.
Appraisal
Rights Available (See
Page [l])
Under Delaware law, record holders of CPI common stock who do
not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and
who otherwise comply with the procedures for exercising
appraisal rights under Delaware law will be entitled to seek
appraisal rights in connection with the merger, and if the
merger is completed, obtain payment in cash of the fair value of
their shares of common stock as determined by the Delaware
Chancery Court, instead of the merger consideration. To exercise
your appraisal rights, you must strictly follow the procedures
described by Delaware law. Due to the complexity of these
procedures, CPI stockholders who are considering exercising such
rights are encouraged to seek the advice of legal counsel. These
procedures are summarized under the heading, The
Merger Appraisal Rights, beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, the text of
the applicable provisions of Delaware law is included as
Annex C to this proxy statement/prospectus. Failure to
strictly comply with these provisions will result in loss of the
right of appraisal.
Completion
of the Merger Is Subject to Certain Conditions (See
Page [l])
The obligation of each of Comtech, CPI and Merger Sub to
complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction, at or prior
to the effective time of the merger, of a number of conditions,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of CPI common stock in accordance with
applicable law, the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation of CPI and the amended and restated bylaws of CPI;
|
|
|
|
absence of any law, injunction or other order of a court or
governmental entity of competent jurisdiction preventing
completion of the merger;
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
(i) expiration or termination of any applicable waiting
period (or extensions thereof) relating to the merger under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 which is referred to in this
proxy statement/prospectus as the HSR Act and
(ii) expiration or termination of any applicable waiting
periods, or receipt of all consents required under any other
applicable competition laws;
|
|
|
|
approval for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of the
shares of Comtech common stock to be issued in the merger,
subject to official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of, and the absence of any stop order (or
proceedings for that purpose) with respect to, the registration
statement on
Form S-4
of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of the representations and warranties made in the
merger agreement by the other party, subject to certain
materiality thresholds;
|
|
|
|
performance and compliance in all material respects by the other
party of the obligations required to be performed by it or
complied with at or prior to the effective time of the merger;
|
|
|
|
absence of a material adverse effect on the other party since
the date of the merger agreement (see The Merger
Agreement Definition of Material Adverse
Effect beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus for the definition of
material adverse effect); and
|
|
|
|
except as previously disclosed to the other party, the absence
of any pending litigation or proceeding of any kind which would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the
disclosing party.
|
In addition, the obligations of Comtech and Merger Sub to
complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction of the
following condition:
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any pending action or proceeding of any kind by
any governmental entity that (i) challenges or seeks to
make illegal, delay materially or otherwise directly or
indirectly prohibit the completion of the merger,
(ii) seeks to prohibit Comtechs or Merger Subs
ability effectively to exercise full rights of ownership of
CPIs common stock following the completion of the merger
or (iii) seeks to compel Comtech, CPI or any of their
respective subsidiaries to take any burdensome action described
under The Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements Efforts to Complete Transactions
beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
Comtech and CPI cannot be certain when, or if, the conditions to
the merger will be satisfied or waived, or that the merger will
be completed.
The
Merger May Not Be Completed Without All Required Regulatory
Approvals (See
Page [l])
Completion of the merger is conditioned upon the receipt of
certain governmental clearances or approvals, including, but not
limited to, the expiration or termination of the applicable
waiting period relating to the merger under the HSR Act.
Comtech and CPI have agreed to use their reasonable best efforts
to obtain all regulatory approvals required to consummate the
merger. However, in using its reasonable best efforts to obtain
these required regulatory approvals, Comtech will not be
required to license, sell or dispose of any assets or submit to
any limitation on the conduct of the business of Comtech or CPI
that, in either case, arise out of this merger and would be
reasonably expected after the closing to result in the
divestiture of a material asset of Comtech or CPI or have a
material adverse effect on Comtech, CPI or the benefits which
Comtech reasonably expects to be realized from the merger.
Comtech and CPI have agreed that any business or assets acquired
or to be acquired by Comtech after May 8, 2010 will not be
deemed material for purposes of the previous sentence.
CPI and Comtech have filed their required HSR Act notification
and regulatory forms in other jurisdictions with respect to the
merger and various governmental reviews are underway.
12
No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI (See
Page [l])
CPI will not, nor will it permit any of its subsidiaries to, nor
will it authorize or knowingly permit any of its or any of its
subsidiaries officers, directors, employees or
representatives to (i) solicit, initiate or otherwise
knowingly facilitate or encourage the submission of any
acquisition proposal (as defined under The Merger
Agreement Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus), (ii) participate
in any discussions or negotiations regarding any acquisition
proposal or furnish to any person any non-public information
with respect to or access to the properties of CPI in connection
with an acquisition proposal, (iii) enter into any
agreement or other understanding with respect to any acquisition
proposal or enter into any agreement requiring CPI to terminate
or otherwise fail to consummate the merger or (iv) fail to
make, or withdraw or modify in a manner adverse to Comtech, the
recommendation of the CPI board of directors in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement. Notwithstanding these
restrictions, however, the merger agreement provides that, under
specified circumstances at any time prior to the adoption of the
merger agreement by CPI stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
CPI may, in response to an unsolicited acquisition proposal from
a third party that the CPI board of directors or a committee
thereof determines constitutes or would reasonably be expected
to lead to a superior acquisition proposal (as defined under
The Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements No Solicitation of Transactions by
CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus), directly or through its
representatives participate in negotiations or discussions with
such party and furnish non-public information to such third
party pursuant to a customary confidentiality agreement
(provided that all such information is or has been provided or
made available to Comtech).
|
|
|
|
The CPI board of directors or any committee thereof may fail to
make, or withdraw or modify in a manner adverse to Comtech, its
recommendation in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement
or may approve, recommend or endorse an unsolicited acquisition
proposal, in each case either (i) following receipt of an
unsolicited acquisition proposal made after the date of the
merger agreement that CPIs board of directors or a
committee thereof determines constitutes a superior acquisition
proposal or (ii) in response to a material event,
development, circumstance, occurrence or change in circumstances
or facts not related to a competing acquisition proposal that
was not known to CPIs board of directors or a committee
thereof on the date of the merger agreement (or if known, the
magnitude or material consequences of which were not known or
understood as of that date).
|
Notwithstanding the two bullet points above, the CPI board of
directors or a committee thereof may not change its
recommendation or approve an unsolicited acquisition proposal
unless CPI notifies Comtech of its intention to do so (together
with a copy of the agreement for any proposed acquisition
proposal) at least three business days prior to taking such
action and Comtech does not, within three business days of
receipt of such notice, make an offer that the CPI board of
directors or a committee thereof determines, in good faith,
after consultation with its outside financial and legal
advisors, is at least as favorable to CPI stockholders as the
acquisition proposal (if the intended recommendation change
relates to a acquisition proposal) or that would obviate the
need for the recommendation change (if the intended
recommendation change relates to any other event). Furthermore,
the actions described in the preceding two bullet points may be
taken only if the CPI board of directors or a committee thereof
determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal advisors, that failure to take such action would be
reasonably likely to constitute a violation of its fiduciary
duties under Delaware law. See The Merger
Background of the Merger and The Merger
CPIs Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the CPI
Board of Directors beginning on pages
[l]
and
[l],
respectively, of this proxy statement/prospectus.
CPIs board of directors also may respond to any tender
offer that may be made in order to comply with the requirements
of
Rule 14e-2
or
Rule 14d-9
under the Exchange Act and make any disclosure to its
stockholders if required by law or by the rules and regulations
of the NASDAQ Global Select Market or, if the board of
directors, after consultation with counsel, concludes in good
faith that making such disclosure is required in order for the
board to comply with its fiduciary duties under applicable law.
Comtech has the right to terminate the merger agreement if,
prior to the special meeting, the CPI board of directors or a
committee of the board of directors changes its recommendation
in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner
adverse to Comtech. CPI has the right to terminate the merger
agreement in order to enter
13
into an acquisition that is a superior acquisition proposal. See
The Merger Agreement Termination of the Merger
Agreement beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (See
Page [l])
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time before the
completion of the merger by mutual written consent of Comtech
and CPI.
The merger agreement may also be terminated prior to the
completion of the merger by either Comtech or CPI if:
|
|
|
|
|
a court or other government entity has issued an order enjoining
or has otherwise prohibited the merger and such injunction or
prohibition has become final and non-appealable;
|
|
|
|
CPI stockholder approval is not received at the duly called and
held special meeting of CPI stockholders; or
|
|
|
|
the closing has not occurred on or before December 1, 2010;
provided that either Comtech or CPI may extend such date by
45 days, subject to certain limitations, if the closing has
not occurred because of the failure to obtain a required
approval from one or more regulatory authorities.
|
The merger agreement may also be terminated prior to the
completion of the merger by Comtech (provided that Comtech is
not then in breach of any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements, such that Comtech could not satisfy the
applicable conditions to the closing related to its
representations, warranties and obligations under the merger
agreement) if:
|
|
|
|
|
CPI has breached or failed to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements, such that
CPI could not satisfy the applicable conditions to the closing
related to its representations, warranties, covenants, and
obligations, and such breach or failure to perform is incapable
of being cured by December 1, 2010 (or valid extension of
such date) or has not been cured within 30 days of written
notice from Comtech;
|
|
|
|
the CPI board of directors changes its recommendation in favor
of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner adverse to
Comtech in connection with a superior acquisition proposal (see
The Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements No Solicitation of Transactions by
CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus); or
|
|
|
|
the CPI board of directors changes its recommendation in favor
of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner adverse to
Comtech in response to a material event, development,
circumstance, occurrence or change in circumstances or facts not
related to a competing acquisition proposal that was not known
to CPIs board of directors on the date of the merger
agreement (or if known, the magnitude or material consequences
of which were not known or understood as of that date) (see
The Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements No Solicitation of Transactions by
CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus).
|
The merger agreement may also be terminated prior to the
completion of the merger by CPI (provided that CPI is not then
in breach of any of its representations, warranties, covenants
or agreements, such that CPI could not satisfy the applicable
conditions to the closing related to its representations,
warranties and obligations under the merger agreement):
|
|
|
|
|
if Comtech has breached or failed to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements, such that
Comtech could not satisfy the applicable conditions to the
closing related to its representations, warranties, covenants,
and obligations, and such breach or failure to perform is
incapable of being cured by December 1, 2010 (or valid
extension of such date) or has not been cured within
30 days of written notice from CPI; or
|
|
|
|
in order to enter into a superior acquisition proposal, subject
to its obligations to pay Comtech a termination fee (see
The Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements No Solicitation of Transactions by
CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus).
|
14
Termination
Fee and Liquidated Damages Payable by CPI (See
Page [l])
CPI has agreed to pay a termination fee of $12 million to
Comtech if the merger agreement is terminated under any of the
following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Comtech terminates the merger agreement because the CPI board of
directors changes its recommendation in favor of the adoption of
the merger agreement in a manner adverse to Comtech in
connection with a superior acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
CPI terminates the merger agreement in order to enter into a
superior acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
the CPI board of directors changes its recommendation in favor
of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner adverse to
Comtech, and Comtech or CPI terminates the merger agreement
because CPI stockholder approval is not received at the duly
called and held special meeting of CPI stockholders;
|
|
|
|
(i) an acquisition proposal is made for CPI; (ii) the
CPI board of directors does not change its recommendation in
favor of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner
adverse to Comtech; (iii) Comtech or CPI terminates the
merger agreement because CPI stockholder approval is not
received at the duly called and held special meeting of CPI
stockholders; and (iv) within 12 months, CPI enters
into a definitive agreement or consummates an alternative
transaction (as defined under The Merger
Agreement Termination of the Merger
Agreement Termination Fee Payable by CPI
beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus); or
|
|
|
|
(i) an acquisition proposal is made for CPI;
(ii) Comtech or CPI terminates the merger agreement because
(a) a court or other government entity has issued an order
enjoining or has otherwise prohibited the merger and such
injunction or prohibition has become final and non-appealable or
(b) the closing has not occurred on or before
December 1, 2010 (or as otherwise validly extended); and
(iii) within 12 months, CPI enters into a definitive
agreement or consummates an alternative transaction (as defined
under The Merger Agreement Termination of the
Merger Agreement Termination Fee Payable by
CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus).
|
In addition, CPI has agreed to pay liquidated damages of
$15 million to Comtech if Comtech terminates the merger
agreement because the CPI board of directors or a committee
thereof changes its recommendation in favor of the adoption of
the merger agreement in a manner adverse to Comtech in response
to a material event, development, circumstance, occurrence or
change in circumstances or facts not related to a competing
acquisition proposal that was not known to CPIs board of
directors or a committee thereof on the date of the merger
agreement (or if known, the magnitude or material consequences
of which were not known or understood as of that date).
If the merger agreement is terminated and pursuant to the terms
of the merger agreement, Comtech is entitled receive a
termination fee or liquidated damages, the receipt of the
termination fee or liquidated damages, as applicable, will be
Comtechs exclusive remedy, and Comtech will not be
entitled to any further or other rights, claims or remedies at
law or in equity, all of which further or other rights, claims
and remedies Comtech has irrevocably waived in the merger
agreement.
The CPI board of directors, after consultation with CPIs
legal and financial advisors, believed that, among other things,
the termination fees and liquidated damages payable by CPI in
all the above circumstances, as a percentage of the equity value
of the transaction, were reasonable and would not unduly impede
the ability of a third party to make a superior bid to acquire
CPI if such third party were interested in doing so, and were at
a level consistent with, or favorable to, the fees payable in
customary and comparable merger transactions. See The
Merger CPIs Reasons for the Merger;
Recommendation of the CPI Board of Directors beginning on
page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
The
Voting and Standstill Agreement (See
Page [l])
Pursuant to a voting and standstill agreement entered into
concurrently with the merger agreement, the Cypress Group
stockholders have agreed to vote 49.9% of the outstanding shares
of CPI common stock in favor of the merger. However, if the CPI
board of directors changes its recommendation with respect to
the merger in connection with a superior acquisition proposal
(as such term is described in The Merger
Agreement Covenants and
15
Agreements No Solicitation of Transactions by
CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus), the Cypress Group
stockholders will be obligated to vote only 25% of the
outstanding shares of CPI common stock in favor of the merger
and the remaining shares may be voted at the discretion of the
Cypress Group stockholders. If the CPI board of directors
changes its recommendation for any reason other than in
connection with a superior acquisition proposal, the Cypress
Group stockholders will still be obligated to vote 49.9% of the
outstanding shares of CPI common stock in favor of the merger
unless the
five-day
average closing price of Comtech common stock immediately prior
to the change of recommendation is less than $24.00. In
addition, the voting and standstill agreement includes
restrictions on the ability of the Cypress Group stockholders to
transfer their shares of CPIs common stock before the
merger and on their ability to transfer shares of Comtech common
stock received in the merger following the closing of the
merger. The voting and standstill agreement terminates upon the
earliest of (i) the mutual agreement of the Cypress Group
stockholders and Comtech, (ii) the termination of the
merger agreement or (iii) the second anniversary of the
merger.
Accordingly, the adoption of the merger agreement by CPI
stockholders is substantially assured as long as the voting and
standstill agreement remains in effect and the CPI board of
directors does not change its recommendation (i) in
response to a superior acquisition proposal or (ii) for any
other reason following a decline in the
five-day
average closing price of Comtechs common stock below
$24.00. For a more complete description of the voting and
standstill agreement, see The Voting and Standstill
Agreement beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. The voting and
standstill agreement is also attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex B.
Certain
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (See
Page [l])
The merger generally will be a taxable transaction, and
U.S. holders will generally recognize gain or loss in an
amount equal to the difference, if any, between (i) the sum
of any cash received (including cash received in lieu of a
fractional share of Comtech common stock) and the fair market
value, as of the effective time of the merger, of the shares of
Comtech common stock received by such holder in the exchange and
(ii) such holders tax basis in the shares of CPI
common stock exchanged therefor.
CPI stockholders are urged to consult their tax advisors as to
the specific tax consequences to them of the merger, including
the applicability and effect of U.S. federal, state, local
and foreign income and other tax laws in their particular
circumstances.
Additional information is provided under The
Merger Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Merger beginning on page
[l].
Accounting
Treatment (See
Page [l])
The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition of a
business. Comtech will record net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed from CPI at
their respective fair values at the date of the completion of
the merger. Any excess of the purchase price, which will equal
the market value, at the date of the completion of the merger,
of the Comtech common stock issued as consideration for the
merger, over the net fair value of such assets and liabilities
will be recorded as goodwill.
The financial condition and results of operations of Comtech
after completion of the merger will reflect CPIs balances
and results after completion of the transaction but will not be
restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial
condition or results of operations of CPI. The earnings of
Comtech following the completion of the merger will reflect
acquisition accounting adjustments, including the effect of
changes in the carrying value for assets and liabilities on
depreciation and amortization expense. Intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives and goodwill will not be amortized but
will be tested for impairment at least annually, and all assets
including goodwill will be tested for impairment when certain
indicators are present. If in the future, Comtech determines
that tangible or intangible assets (including goodwill) are
impaired, Comtech would record an impairment charge at that time.
16
Rights of
CPI Stockholders Will Change as a Result of the Merger (See
Page [l])
CPI stockholders will have different rights once they become
Comtech stockholders due to differences between the
organizational documents of Comtech and CPI. These differences
are described in more detail under Comparison of
Stockholder Rights beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Repayment
of Existing CPI Indebtedness (See
Page [l])
Comtech intends to repay in full all existing outstanding
indebtedness of CPI either upon the closing or shortly following
closing, in each case in accordance with the terms of such
indebtedness. Assuming that the appropriate notices required
under the indentures governing CPIs existing floating rate
senior notes and senior subordinated notes outstanding are
provided on the date of closing of the merger, these notes may
be outstanding for up to 75 days following the closing of
the merger.
17
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF COMTECH
The following table presents selected historical consolidated
financial data of Comtech. The data as of, and for, the years
ended July 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are derived
from Comtechs audited consolidated financial statements
for those periods, as adjusted for the retroactive application
of FSP
APB 14-1.
The data as of, and for, the nine months ended April 30,
2010 and 2009 (as adjusted for the retroactive application of
FSP
APB 14-1)
are derived from Comtechs unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements for those periods. Comtechs
management believes that the companys interim unaudited
financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent
with its audited financial statements and include all normal and
recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for each interim period.
The information in the following table is only a summary and is
not indicative of the results of future operations of Comtech.
You should read the following information together with
Comtechs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended July 31, 2009, Comtechs Quarterly
Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly periods ended April 30, 2010,
January 31, 2010 and October 31, 2009, and the other
information that Comtech has filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, which is referred to as the SEC in this
proxy statement/prospectus, and incorporated by reference into
this proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of / for Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended April 30,
|
|
|
As of / for Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(audited)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
521,251
|
|
|
$
|
464,346
|
|
|
$
|
586,372
|
|
|
$
|
531,627
|
|
|
$
|
445,684
|
|
|
$
|
391,511
|
|
|
$
|
307,890
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
47,161
|
|
|
$
|
41,347
|
|
|
$
|
47,525
|
|
|
$
|
73,650
|
|
|
$
|
62,637
|
|
|
$
|
42,884
|
|
|
$
|
34,449
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
3.05
|
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.76
|
|
|
$
|
2.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,013,910
|
|
|
$
|
724,711
|
|
|
$
|
938,671
|
|
|
$
|
652,723
|
|
|
$
|
555,780
|
|
|
$
|
454,542
|
|
|
$
|
381,517
|
|
Long-term obligations
|
|
$
|
202,420
|
|
|
$
|
2,211
|
|
|
$
|
202,283
|
|
|
$
|
91,946
|
|
|
$
|
87,475
|
|
|
$
|
83,359
|
|
|
$
|
79,565
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
18
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF CPI
The following table presents selected historical consolidated
financial data of CPI. The data as of, and for, the years ended
October 2, 2009, October 3, 2008, September 28,
2007, September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005 are
derived from CPIs audited consolidated financial
statements for those periods. The data as of, and for, the six
months ended April 2, 2010 and April 3, 2009 are
derived from CPIs unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements for those periods. CPIs management
believes that the companys interim unaudited financial
statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with its
audited financial statements and include all normal and
recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for each interim period.
The information in the following table is only a summary and is
not indicative of the results of future operations of CPI. You
should read the following information together with CPIs
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended October 2, 2009, CPIs Quarterly
Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly periods ended April 2, 2010 and
January 1, 2010, and the other information that CPI has
filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of / for Six Months Ended
|
|
|
As of / for Year Ended
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(audited)
|
|
|
|
April 2,
|
|
|
April 3,
|
|
|
October 2,
|
|
|
October 3,
|
|
|
September 28,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
171,119
|
|
|
$
|
159,049
|
|
|
$
|
332,876
|
|
|
$
|
370,014
|
|
|
$
|
351,090
|
|
|
$
|
339,717
|
|
|
$
|
320,732
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
8,333
|
|
|
$
|
11,344
|
|
|
$
|
23,466
|
|
|
$
|
20,449
|
|
|
$
|
22,503
|
|
|
$
|
17,219
|
|
|
$
|
13,672
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
470,575
|
|
|
$
|
463,756
|
|
|
$
|
458,254
|
|
|
$
|
466,948
|
|
|
$
|
476,222
|
|
|
$
|
441,759
|
|
|
$
|
454,544
|
|
Long-term obligations
|
|
$
|
197,169
|
|
|
$
|
219,813
|
|
|
$
|
197,149
|
|
|
$
|
226,349
|
|
|
$
|
246,321
|
|
|
$
|
245,108
|
|
|
$
|
284,231
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
5.80
|
|
19
SELECTED
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
The following selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information has been derived from, and should be read
in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and
the related notes of both Comtech and CPI incorporated herein by
reference, together with the more detailed unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial information provided in the section
titled Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements beginning on
page [l].
The following table presents selected unaudited pro forma
condensed combined balance sheet data, as of April 30,
2010, and selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations data for the nine months ended
April 30, 2010 and for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2009, which are based on the historical financial statements of
Comtech and CPI. Because of different fiscal period ends, and in
accordance with the SECs 93-day conformity rule,
information is presented as outlined below:
|
|
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet data as
of April 30, 2010 is presented as if Comtechs
acquisition of CPI had occurred on April 30, 2010, and
combines historical balance sheet data of Comtech as of
April 30, 2010 with historical balance sheet data of CPI as
of April 2, 2010.
|
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations data for the nine months ended April 30, 2010 is
presented as if Comtechs acquisition of CPI had occurred
on August 1, 2009, and combines Comtechs historical
statement of operations data for the nine months ended
April 30, 2010 with CPIs historical statement of
operations data for the nine months ended April 2, 2010.
CPIs historical statement of operations for the nine
months ended April 2, 2010 was derived by taking CPIs
historical results of operations for the six months ended
April 2, 2010, and adding CPIs historical results of
operations for the three months ended October 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations data for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 is
presented as if Comtechs acquisition of CPI had occurred
on August 1, 2008, and combines Comtechs historical
statement of operations data for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2009, as adjusted for the retroactive application
of FASB ASC 470-20, Debt Debt with
Conversion and Other Options, with CPIs historical
statement of operations data for the fiscal year ended
October 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
April 30, 2010
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
782,476
|
|
|
$
|
917,717
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
62,007
|
|
|
$
|
68,854
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,321,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations
|
|
$
|
203,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information set forth
above is based on preliminary estimates of the fair values of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed and is based on the net
book value of CPIs assets and liabilities as of
April 2, 2010. The preliminary estimates are based on
available information, certain assumptions and preliminary
valuation work and may change upon finalization of the fair
values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In addition,
because a portion of the purchase price is to be paid in the
form of Comtech common stock, purchase accounting rules require
that some of the merger and integration related charges and the
value of CPIs intangible assets (including goodwill) be
determined based on the fair value of merger consideration on
the date the acquisition closes.
20
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE DATA
The following table presents, for the nine months ended
April 30, 2010 and the fiscal year ended July 31,
2009, selected historical per share data of Comtech and CPI as
well as similar information, reflecting the combination of
Comtech and CPI as if the transaction had been effective for the
periods presented, which we refer to as pro forma
combined information. The hypothetical CPI equivalent per
share data presented below is calculated by multiplying the pro
forma combined amounts for Comtech by the exchange ratio of
0.2382 of a share of Comtech for each share of CPI.
The ultimate amount of consideration that CPI shareholders will
receive will be equal to a combination of $9.00 in cash plus a
fraction of Comtech common stock equal to $8.10 divided by the
average closing price of Comtech common stock over a specified
period of time prior to closing, provided that the fraction
shall not be greater than 0.2382 nor less than 0.2132. The
hypothetical CPI equivalent per share data does not take into
account the cash portion of the merger consideration.
The pro forma combined information is provided for informational
purposes only and is not necessarily an indication of the
results that would have been achieved had the transaction been
completed as of the dates indicated or that may be achieved in
the future. The July 31, 2009 selected comparative per
share information of Comtech and CPI set forth below was derived
from audited financial statements of Comtech (as adjusted for
the adoption of FASB ASC 470-20, Debt
Debt with Conversion and Other Options) combined with
CPIs historical statement of operations data for the
fiscal year ended October 2, 2009. The April 30, 2010
selected comparative share information of Comtech and CPI set
forth below was derived from unaudited interim financial
statements. In the opinion of Comtech and CPIs management,
respectively, the unaudited interim financial statements have
been prepared on the same basis as their respective audited
financial statements. You should read the information in this
section along with Comtech and CPIs historical
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the
period referred to above included in the documents described
under Where You can Find More Information beginning
on
page [l].
You should also read the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information and accompanying discussion and notes
included in this proxy statement/prospectus beginning on
page [l].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of / for the
|
|
As of / for the
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
April 30, 2010
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comtech Historical
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
CPI Historical
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
Pro Forma Combined
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
CPI Equivalent
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comtech Historical
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
CPI Historical
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
Pro Forma Combined
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
CPI Equivalent
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of / for the
|
|
As of / for the
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
April 30, 2010
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
Dividends Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comtech Historical
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
CPI Historical
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
CPI Equivalent
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comtech Historical
|
|
$
|
20.10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
CPI Historical
|
|
$
|
10.47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined
|
|
$
|
20.96
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
CPI Equivalent
|
|
$
|
4.99
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information set forth
above is based on preliminary estimates of the fair values of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed and is based on the net
book value of CPIs assets and liabilities as of
April 2, 2010. The preliminary estimates are based on
available information, certain assumptions and preliminary
valuation work and may change upon finalization of the fair
values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In addition,
because a portion of the purchase price is to be paid in the
form of Comtech common stock, purchase accounting rules require
that some of the merger and integration related charges and the
value of CPIs intangible assets (including goodwill) be
determined based on the fair value of merger consideration on
the date the acquisition closes.
22
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Market
Prices
The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods
indicated, the
intra-day
high and low sales prices per share for Comtech and CPI common
stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, which is
the principal trading market for both Comtech and CPI common
stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comtech
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (August 1, 2007 to October 31, 2007)
|
|
$
|
58.00
|
|
|
$
|
35.45
|
|
Second Quarter (November 1, 2007 to January 31, 2008)
|
|
|
56.07
|
|
|
|
43.01
|
|
Third Quarter (February 1, 2008 to April 30, 2008)
|
|
|
48.41
|
|
|
|
37.59
|
|
Fourth Quarter (May 1, 2008 to July 31, 2008)
|
|
|
51.21
|
|
|
|
38.63
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (August 1, 2008 to October 31, 2008)
|
|
$
|
50.55
|
|
|
$
|
40.00
|
|
Second Quarter (November 1, 2008 to January 31, 2009)
|
|
|
50.34
|
|
|
|
38.62
|
|
Third Quarter (February 1, 2009 to April 30, 2009)
|
|
|
41.91
|
|
|
|
19.56
|
|
Fourth Quarter (May 1, 2009 to July 31, 2009)
|
|
|
34.24
|
|
|
|
26.40
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (August 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009)
|
|
$
|
36.74
|
|
|
$
|
31.22
|
|
Second Quarter (November 1, 2009 to January 31, 2010)
|
|
|
38.39
|
|
|
|
28.42
|
|
Third Quarter (February 1, 2010 to April 30, 2010)
|
|
|
35.74
|
|
|
|
29.56
|
|
Fourth Quarter (May 1, 2010 through
[l],
2010)
|
|
|
[l]
|
|
|
|
[l]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPI Common Stock
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (September 29, 2007 to December 28, 2007)
|
|
$
|
21.00
|
|
|
$
|
15.81
|
|
Second Quarter (December 29, 2007 to March 28, 2008)
|
|
|
18.09
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
Third Quarter (March 29, 2008 to June 27, 2008)
|
|
|
14.31
|
|
|
|
9.25
|
|
Fourth Quarter (June 28, 2008 to October 3, 2008)
|
|
|
16.02
|
|
|
|
11,42
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (October 4, 2008 to January 2, 2009)
|
|
$
|
12.43
|
|
|
$
|
5.07
|
|
Second Quarter (January 3, 2009 to April 3, 2009)
|
|
|
9.83
|
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
Third Quarter (April 4, 2009 to July 3, 2009)
|
|
|
12.93
|
|
|
|
7.13
|
|
Fourth Quarter (July 4, 2009 to October 2, 2009)
|
|
|
12.22
|
|
|
|
8.37
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (October 3, 2009 to January 1, 2010)
|
|
$
|
14.48
|
|
|
$
|
9.27
|
|
Second Quarter (January 2, 2010 to April 2, 2010)
|
|
|
14.27
|
|
|
|
10.80
|
|
Third Quarter (April 3, 2010 through
[l],
2010)
|
|
|
[l]
|
|
|
|
[l]
|
|
The following table sets forth the closing sale price per share
of Comtech and CPI common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market as of May 7, 2010, the last trading day
before the public announcement of the merger agreement, and as
of
[l],
2010, the most recent practicable trading day prior to the date
of this proxy statement/prospectus. The table also shows the
implied value of the merger consideration proposed for each
share of CPI common stock using only the closing price of CPI
common stock as of the same two dates. The actual value of
23
the merger consideration will be determined by the average
closing price of Comtechs stock over the five consecutive
trading days ending on (and including) the second trading day
prior to closing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Merger
|
|
|
Comtech Common Stock
|
|
CPI Common Stock
|
|
Consideration
|
|
May 7, 2010
|
|
$
|
31.06
|
|
|
$
|
13.05
|
|
|
$
|
16.40
|
|
[l],
2010
|
|
$
|
[l]
|
|
|
$
|
[l]
|
|
|
$
|
[l]
|
|
No assurance can be given concerning the market prices of
Comtech or CPI common stock before the completion of the merger
or Comtech common stock after the completion of the merger.
Dividends
Comtech has never paid cash dividends on its common stock.
Although Comtech currently expects to use earnings and cash on
hand to finance the development and expansion of its business,
Comtechs board of directors reviews its dividend policy
periodically. The payment of dividends in the future will depend
upon Comtechs earnings, capital requirements, financial
condition, compliance with its credit facility, and other
factors considered relevant by Comtechs board of directors.
CPI currently expects to retain future earnings for use in the
operation and expansion of its business and does not anticipate
paying any cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable
future.
24
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information contained or incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, including the
matters addressed in Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus, you should carefully
consider the following risk factors in determining whether to
vote for the adoption of the merger agreement. You should also
read and consider the risk factors associated with each of the
businesses of Comtech and CPI because these risk factors may
affect the operations and financial results of the combined
company. These risk factors may be found under Part I,
Item IA, Risk Factors in Comtechs Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended July 31, 2009 and CPIs Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended October 2, 2009, and Part II,
Item IA, Risk Factors in Comtechs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 30, 2010, and CPIs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 2, 2010, each of which is on
file with the SEC and all of which are incorporated by reference
into this proxy statement/prospectus.
Risks
Related to the Merger
The
conversion ratio for the stock portion of the merger
consideration will not be greater than 0.2382. As a result, the
value of the shares of Comtech common stock that CPI
stockholders will receive in connection with the merger could be
less than the value of those shares today.
In the merger, CPI stockholders will be entitled to receive for
each share of CPI common stock owned by them a combination of
$9.00 in cash and a number of shares of Comtech common stock
equal to the conversion ratio. The conversion ratio is equal to
$8.10 divided by the average closing price of Comtech common
stock for a specified period prior to the closing of the merger,
but not to be less than 0.2132 or more than 0.2382. Accordingly,
so long as the price of Comtech common stock remains below
$34.00, the conversion ratio will be fixed at 0.2382. Comtech
and CPI will not adjust the conversion ratio upward, regardless
of the market price of Comtech common stock at any price below
$34.00 per share. The market price of Comtech common stock will
likely be different, and may be lower, on the date CPI
stockholders receive their shares of Comtech common stock than
the market price of Comtech common stock on the date of this
proxy statement/prospectus. Differences in the market price of
Comtech common stock may be the result of changes in the
business, operations or prospects of Comtech, market reactions
to the proposed merger, regulatory considerations, general
market and economic conditions or other factors.
In addition, because it is possible that the merger will be
completed later than the time of the special meeting, CPI
stockholders may not know the exact value of the Comtech common
stock that will be issued in the merger, and the exact value of
the Comtech common stock issued in the merger may be less than
it would have been had the merger occurred on the date of the
special meeting. There is no minimum closing price of Comtech
common stock on the closing date at which either CPI or Comtech
may unilaterally terminate the merger agreement. CPI and Comtech
encourage you to obtain current market quotations for Comtech
common stock before you vote your shares.
During the twelve-month period ending on
[l],
2010, the closing price of Comtech common stock varied from a
low of
$[l]
to a high of
$[l],
and ended that period at
$[l].
If the average closing price of common stock for the specified
period prior to the closing is equal to
$[l]
(the closing price on
[l],
the most recent practicable trading day prior to the date of
this proxy statement/prospectus), the conversion ratio would be
[l]
(or
$[l]
worth of Comtech common stock per share of CPI common
stock), resulting in total merger consideration value of
$[l]
per share of CPI common stock.
Because
the conversion ratio may be decreased in the event of an
increase in the price of Comtech common stock, CPI stockholders
may not receive the full benefit of that increase.
Because the conversion ratio is subject to adjustment pursuant
to the terms of the merger agreement if the average closing
price of Comtech common stock is between $34.00 and $38.00, CPI
stockholders will not receive the full benefit of any increase
in the average closing price of Comtech common stock between
those price levels.
25
In
order to complete the merger, CPI and Comtech must obtain
certain governmental approvals, and if such approvals are not
granted or are granted with conditions that bind the parties,
the completion of the merger may be jeopardized or the
anticipated benefits of the merger could be
reduced.
Completion of the merger is conditioned upon the receipt of
certain governmental clearances or approvals, including, but not
limited to, the expiration or termination of the applicable
waiting period relating to the merger under the HSR Act and the
expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period, or
receipt of approval, under certain foreign antitrust laws.
Although CPI and Comtech have agreed in the merger agreement to
use their reasonable best efforts to obtain the requisite
governmental approvals, there can be no assurance that these
approvals will be obtained. In addition, the governmental
authorities from which these approvals are required have broad
discretion in administering the governing regulations. As a
condition to approval of the merger, these governmental
authorities may impose requirements, limitations or costs or
require divestitures or place restrictions on the conduct of
Comtechs business after the completion of the merger.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Comtech is generally
not required to take actions (such as divesting or holding
separate assets or entering into settlements or consent decrees
with governmental authorities) if such action would reasonably
be expected to result in the sale of a material asset or in a
material adverse effect on CPI, Comtech or the benefits Comtech
reasonably expects to be realized from the merger. However, if,
notwithstanding the provisions of the merger agreement, either
CPI or Comtech becomes subject to any term, condition,
obligation or restriction (whether because such term, condition,
obligation or restriction does not rise to the specified level
of materiality or Comtech otherwise consents to its imposition),
the imposition of such term, condition, obligation or
restriction could adversely affect Comtechs ability to
integrate CPIs operations into Comtechs operations,
reduce the anticipated benefits of the merger or otherwise
adversely affect the combined companies business and
results of operations after the completion of the merger. See
The Merger Regulatory Approvals Required for
the Merger and The Merger Agreement
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger beginning on
pages
[l]
and
[l],
respectively, of this proxy statement/prospectus.
CPIs
failure to achieve future results in line with Comtechs
expectations could adversely affect the combined businesses and
Comtechs stock price.
The acquisition of CPI may pose certain risks to Comtechs
business. If, in the future, CPI experiences substantially lower
results than Comtech expects, it could have a material adverse
impact on Comtechs business, results of operations and
financial condition. Neither CPI nor Comtech can assure you that
CPI will perform in accordance with Comtechs expectations.
Failure
to achieve expected benefits of the merger and integrate CPI
operations with Comtechs could adversely affect the
combined businesses and Comtechs stock
price.
Although Comtech expects to realize strategic, operational and
financial benefits as a result of the CPI acquisition, Comtech
cannot be certain whether, and to what extent, such benefits
will be achieved in the future. In particular, the success of
the CPI acquisition will depend on achieving efficiencies and
cost savings, and no assurances can be given that Comtech will
be able to do so. In addition, in order to obtain the benefits
of the merger, Comtech must integrate CPIs subsidiaries
and operations, including CPIs international subsidiaries
and operations, and such integration may be complex and the
failure to do so quickly and effectively may negatively affect
earnings.
In addition, the market price of Comtech common stock may
decline as a result of the merger if the integration of Comtech
and CPI is unsuccessful, takes longer than expected or fails to
achieve financial benefits to the extent anticipated by
financial analysts or investors, or the effect of the merger on
Comtechs financial results is otherwise not consistent
with the expectations of financial analysts or investors.
The
CPI acquisition will significantly expand Comtechs
business, which could have an adverse effect on operating
results.
The CPI acquisition will significantly expand the types of
products that Comtech sells, the number of facilities Comtech
operates and the associated corporate and administrative
operations, including, for example; managing
26
foreign currency fluctuations and hedging international
operations, thereby presenting Comtech with significant
challenges including managing the substantial increase in the
scale of Comtechs operations resulting from the
acquisition. Comtech foresees having to test, and possibly make
changes to and refine, internal controls relating to CPI.
Moreover, Comtech cannot be certain when the appropriate testing
and refinement of controls and procedures will be completed. The
diversion of Comtech managements attention to these
matters and away from other business concerns could have an
adverse effect on Comtechs business and operating results.
Comtech
expects to incur significant non-recurring expenses related to
the merger.
In connection with its plan to integrate the operations of CPI
with its own operations after the merger, Comtech anticipates
that certain non-recurring charges, such as change-in control
related payments made to certain CPI executives, the
acceleration of vesting of certain stock-based awards held by
CPI employees, and professional fees for financial and legal
advisors of both Comtech and CPI will be incurred. Comtech
cannot identify the timing, nature and amount of all such
charges as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus.
However, such charges could affect Comtechs results of
operations in the period in which such charges are recorded.
CPIs
and Comtechs business relationships, including customer
relationships, may be subject to disruption due to uncertainty
associated with the merger.
Parties with which CPI and Comtech do business, including
customers and suppliers, may experience uncertainty associated
with the transaction, including with respect to current or
future business relationships with CPI, Comtech or the combined
business. As a result, CPIs and Comtechs business
relationships may be subject to disruptions if customers,
suppliers and others attempt to negotiate changes in existing
business relationships or consider entering into business
relationships with parties other than CPI, Comtech or the
combined business. These disruptions could have an adverse
effect on the businesses, financial condition, results of
operations or prospects of the combined business. The adverse
effect of such disruptions could be exacerbated by a delay in
the completion of the merger or termination of the merger
agreement.
The
price of Comtech common stock and Comtechs results of
operations may be affected by factors different from those
affecting the price of CPI common stock and CPIs results
of operations.
Holders of CPI common stock will be entitled to receive cash and
Comtech common stock in the merger and will thus become holders
of Comtech common stock. Comtechs business is different in
certain ways from that of CPI, and Comtechs results of
operations, as well as the price of Comtech common stock, may be
affected by factors different from those affecting CPIs
results of operations and the price of CPI common stock. The
price of Comtech common stock may fluctuate significantly
following the merger, including as a result of factors over
which Comtech has no control.
Directors
and executive officers of CPI have interests in the transaction
that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of CPI
stockholders.
CPIs executive officers and directors have financial
interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition
to, their interests as CPI stockholders. Except with respect to
separate agreements with certain CPI executives, unvested stock
options, restricted stock and restricted stock units held by
CPIs executive officers and directors will vest in
connection with the merger and will be cancelled in exchange for
cash payments. As disclosed in the table in the section titled
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger beginning
on page
[l]
and subject to the assumptions referenced in the text
accompanying that table, CPIs executive officers and
directors collectively may receive up to
$[l]
as a result of the merger, which includes (i) an
estimated payment of approximately
$[l]
of merger consideration for shares of CPI common stock that
they own, (ii) an estimated payment of approximately
$[l]
of merger consideration for stock options, restricted stock and
restricted stock units that they hold and (iii) if the
executive officers of CPI are terminated without cause or resign
for good reason in connection with the merger, aggregate
severance payments and benefits of approximately
$[l].
CPIs executive officers and directors will also receive
indemnification and liability insurance benefits in connection
with the merger and certain of CPIs executive officers may
enter into employment agreements with
27
Comtech, although no agreements have been entered into and no
terms, conditions or understandings have been finalized as of
the date of this proxy statement/prospectus.
The
merger agreement limits CPIs ability to pursue
alternatives to the merger.
The merger agreement contains provisions that make it more
difficult for CPI to sell its business to a party other than
Comtech. These provisions include a general prohibition on CPI
soliciting any acquisition proposal or offer for a competing
transaction. Further, there are only limited exceptions to
CPIs agreement that CPIs board of directors or a
committee thereof will not withdraw or modify in a manner
adverse to Comtech the recommendation of the CPI board of
directors in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement, and
Comtech generally has a right to match any competing acquisition
proposals that may be made. Although the CPI board of directors
or a committee thereof may take these actions and, in certain
circumstances, CPI may terminate the merger agreement if the CPI
board of directors or a committee thereof determines in good
faith that failure to do so would be reasonably likely to
constitute a violation of its fiduciary duties to CPIs
stockholders under Delaware law, doing so in specified
situations could entitle Comtech to a termination fee of
$12 million or liquidated damages of $15 million. See
The Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements, The Merger Agreement
Termination of the Merger Agreement and The Voting
and Standstill Agreement No Solicitation
beginning on pages
[l],
[l]
and
[l],
respectively, of this proxy statement/prospectus.
While CPI believes these provisions are reasonable and not
preclusive of other offers, the provisions might discourage a
third party that has an interest in acquiring all or a
significant part of CPI from considering or proposing that
acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay
consideration with a higher per-share value than the currently
proposed merger consideration. Furthermore, the termination fee
may result in a potential competing acquirer proposing to pay a
lower per-share price to acquire CPI than it might otherwise
have proposed to pay because of the added expense of the
termination fee that may become payable in certain circumstances.
The
merger may be dilutive to Comtechs earnings per share,
which may negatively affect the market price of Comtech common
stock. Furthermore, the acquisition of CPI may ultimately not
prove successful, and Comtech may not realize anticipated
benefits from the acquisition.
Because the value of the aggregate merger consideration is
determined in part by the future price per share of Comtech
common stock, it is unclear whether the merger will be accretive
or dilutive to Comtechs earnings per share. In addition,
any accretion or dilution may be affected by future events and
conditions, including adverse changes in market conditions and
additional transaction and integration related costs. Any lack
of accretion to, or any dilution of, Comtechs earnings per
share could cause the price of Comtechs common stock to
decline. As a result of these and other factors, the acquisition
of CPI may ultimately not prove successful, and Comtech may not
realize anticipated benefits from the acquisition.
Comtechs
investments in recorded goodwill and other intangible assets as
a result of the acquisition of CPI and prior acquisitions could
be impaired as a result of future business conditions or if
Comtech changes its reporting unit structure.
Comtech has goodwill and intangible assets of
$199.4 million recorded on Comtechs balance sheet as
of April 30, 2010 and this amount is expected to
significantly increase in connection with the proposed merger
with CPI. For purposes of reviewing impairment and the
recoverability of goodwill, each of Comtechs three
operating segments currently constitutes a reporting unit, and
Comtech must make various assumptions regarding estimated future
cash flows and other factors in determining the fair values of
the reporting unit. The annual impairment test is based on
several factors requiring judgment and is based on how
Comtechs President and Chief Executive Officer manages the
business. If these estimates or their related assumptions change
in the future, or if Comtech changes its future reporting
structure, including any changes as a result of the proposed
merger with CPI, Comtech may be required to record impairment
charges in future periods. Comtech generally performs an annual
impairment review in the first quarter of each fiscal year or
when there are indicators of impairments, such as a significant
adverse change that could impact Comtechs future financial
performance. Although Comtech performed its fiscal 2010
impairment testing on August 1, 2009 and Comtech determined
that there was no impairment of its goodwill, changes in its
future operating performance or business conditions, in general,
could result in an impairment of
28
goodwill in future periods, which could be material to
Comtechs results of operations. In addition, if Comtech is
not successful in maintaining operating efficiencies associated
with its acquisition of CPI, Comtechs goodwill and
intangible assets may become impaired. Any impairment charges
that Comtech may take in the future, could be material to its
results of operations and financial condition.
Failure
to complete the merger could negatively impact the stock price
and the future business and financial results of
CPI.
If the merger is not completed, the ongoing businesses of CPI
may be adversely affected and, without realizing any of the
benefits of having completed the merger, CPI will be subject to
a number of risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
CPI may be required to pay Comtech a termination fee of
$12 million or liquidated damages of $15 million if
the merger is terminated under certain circumstances, as
described in the merger agreement and summarized in this proxy
statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
CPI will be required to pay certain costs relating to the
proposed merger, whether or not the merger is completed;
|
|
|
|
under the merger agreement, CPI is subject to certain
restrictions on the conduct of its business prior to completing
the merger which may affect its ability to execute certain of
its business strategies; and
|
|
|
|
matters relating to the merger (including integration planning)
may require substantial commitments of time and resources by CPI
management, which could otherwise have been devoted to other
opportunities that may have been beneficial to CPI as an
independent company.
|
In addition, CPI could be subject to litigation related to any
failure to complete the merger or related to any enforcement
proceeding commenced against CPI to perform its respective
obligations under the merger agreement. If the merger is not
completed, these risks may materialize and may adversely affect
CPIs business, financial results and stock price.
CPI
stockholders will have reduced ownership and voting interests
after the merger and will exercise less influence over
management of Comtech than currently exercised over management
of CPI.
After the effective time of the merger, CPI stockholders will
own in the aggregate a significantly smaller percentage of
Comtech than their current 100% ownership of CPI. Following
completion of the merger, CPI stockholders are expected to own
less than
[l] percent
of the outstanding shares of Comtech common stock based on the
number of shares of CPI common stock and Comtech common stock
outstanding on the record date and the price of Comtech common
stock on the record date. Consequently, CPI stockholders, as a
general matter, will have less influence over the management and
policies of Comtech than they currently exercise over the
management and policies of CPI.
CPI
stockholders will have substantively different rights with
respect to their holdings following the merger.
Upon consummation of the merger, the CPI stockholders will
become stockholders of Comtech. There are material differences
between the rights of CPI stockholders under the CPI governing
documents and the rights of Comtech stockholders under the
Comtech governing documents. See Comparison of Stockholder
Rights beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Risks
Relating to Comtech and CPI
Comtech and CPI are, and following completion of the merger,
Comtech and CPI will continue to be, subject to the risks
described in Part I, Item IA, Risk Factors
in Comtechs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended July 31, 2009 and CPIs Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended October 2, 2009, and Part II,
Item IA, Risk Factors in Comtechs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 30, 2010, and CPIs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 2, 2010, each of which is on
file with the SEC and all of which are
29
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
See Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Those risks include, but are not limited to, risks associated
with a variety of U.S. federal, state and local, as well as
foreign, environmental, zoning and other land use laws and
regulations. Changes in environmental, zoning and other land use
laws or regulations (or in their enforcement) affecting or
limiting, for example, the use of certain chemicals,
and/or
certain of the manufacturing processes or disposal practices of
Comtech or CPI, could restrict the ability of Comtech and CPI to
operate their businesses as and where they are currently
operating
and/or could
impose material additional costs of operating.
30
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement/prospectus and the documents incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus contain
forward looking statements that are intended to be
covered by the safe harbor provided by the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Representatives of Comtech and
CPI may also make forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are statements that are not historical facts, and are
identified by words such as expect,
believe, predict,
anticipate, contemplate,
will, may, might,
continue, plan, estimate,
objective, intend, project,
budget, forecast, can,
could, should, would,
likely, potential and similar
expressions. These statements include, but are not limited to,
statements about the expected costs and benefits of the merger,
the adoption of the merger agreement by CPI stockholders, the
satisfaction of the closing conditions to the merger, the timing
of the completion of the merger and Comtechs plans,
objectives and expectations after the completion of the merger.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance.
These statements are based upon the current beliefs and
expectations of management of Comtech and CPI and are subject to
numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
outcomes and results, including project completion dates,
production rates, capital expenditures, costs and business
plans, to be materially different from those projected or
anticipated. In addition to the risks described under Risk
Factors beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus and those risks described
in documents that are incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus, the following factors, among others, could
cause such differences:
Merger-Related
Factors
|
|
|
|
|
CPI stockholder approval may not be obtained in a timely manner,
or at all;
|
|
|
|
the regulatory approvals required for the merger may not be
obtained on the proposed terms, on the anticipated schedule, or
at all;
|
|
|
|
the merger may not close due to the failure to satisfy any of
the closing conditions;
|
|
|
|
expected synergies and value creation from the merger may not be
realized, or will not be realized within the anticipated time
period;
|
|
|
|
disruption from the merger may make it more difficult for
Comtech and CPI to maintain business and operational
relationships;
|
|
|
|
key employees of CPI may not be retained;
|
|
|
|
the businesses may not be integrated successfully; and
|
|
|
|
management time may be diverted on merger-related matters;
|
Other
Factors
|
|
|
|
|
risks related to actions taken by either of the companies,
including but not limited to, restructuring or strategic
initiatives (including capital investments or asset acquisitions
or dispositions);
|
|
|
|
diversion of corporate resources and management attention by
future acquisitions and investments, and the failure of such
acquisitions to meet expectations;
|
|
|
|
risks related to the current economic climate, including the
difficulty of forecasting results of operations, the possibility
of additional reductions in telecommunications equipment and
systems spending, the inability of customers to obtain financing
and the difficulty of maintaining affordable credit insurance;
|
|
|
|
the timing of receipt of, and performance on, new or existing
customer orders that can cause significant fluctuations in net
sales and operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant fluctuations in, and likely volatility of, operating
results;
|
|
|
|
potential material adverse effects from changes in government
policy, including changes in U.S. policies relating to Iraq
and Afghanistan;
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
potential material adverse effects from terrorist attacks and
threats, and government responses thereto, and threats of war;
|
|
|
|
ability to maintain current levels of U.S. government
business;
|
|
|
|
the timing and funding of government contracts, including risks
associated with Comtechs U.S. Army Movement Tracking
System (referred to as MTS) and Blue Force Tracking (referred to
as BFT) contracts and next generation MTS and BFT contracts;
|
|
|
|
adjustments to gross profits on long-term contracts;
|
|
|
|
possibility of noncompliance with numerous domestic and
international laws, regulations and restrictions (including
those pertaining to income taxes) which could materially impact
the business, results of operations and financial condition;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with pending or threatened legal proceedings
and other matters;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with Comtechs obligations under its
revolving credit facility;
|
|
|
|
unexpected material increases in costs and compliance expenses
related to the securities laws, related regulations and
financial reporting standards;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with international sales, rapid technological
change, evolving industry standards, frequent new product
announcements and enhancements, changing customer demands, and
changes in prevailing economic and political conditions;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with currency fluctuations and related hedging
operations;
|
|
|
|
natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
risks relating to the recent and anticipated growth, including
loss of key technical or management personnel, inability to
improve processes and systems to keep pace with anticipated
growth and highly competitive markets for communications
products;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with environmental and zoning laws and
regulations and obligations relating to environmental matters;
|
|
|
|
inability to implement business plans;
|
|
|
|
adverse effects on cash flow from debt service
obligations; and
|
|
|
|
volatility of stock price.
|
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements made in this proxy
statement/prospectus or documents incorporated into this proxy
statement/prospectus or by representatives of Comtech or CPI.
These statements speak only as of the date hereof, or, in the
case of statements in any document incorporated by reference, as
of the date of such document, or, in the case of statements made
by representatives of Comtech or CPI, on the date those
statements are made. All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements concerning the merger, the combined
company or any other matter addressed in this proxy
statement/prospectus and attributable to Comtech, CPI or any
person acting on behalf of either company are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained or referred to in this section. Comtech and CPI
expressly disclaim any obligation to update or publish revised
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence
of any unanticipated events.
32
THE
COMPANIES
Comtech
Comtech designs, develops, produces and markets innovative
products, systems and services for advanced communications
solutions. Comtech believes many of its solutions play a vital
role in providing or enhancing communication capabilities when
terrestrial communications infrastructure is unavailable,
inefficient or too expensive. Comtech conducts business through
three complementary segments: telecommunications transmission,
mobile data communications and RF microwave amplifiers. Comtech
sells products to a diverse customer base in the global
commercial and government communications markets. Comtech
believes it is a leader in the market segments that it serves.
The principal trading market for Comtechs common stock
(NASDAQGS: CMTL) is the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
The principal executive offices of Comtech are located at 68
South Service Road, Suite 230 Melville, New York
11747; its telephone number is
(631) 962-7000;
and its web site is www.comtechtel.com.
Angels Acquisition Corp., referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as Merger Sub, is a Delaware corporation
and a wholly owned subsidiary of Comtech. Merger Sub was formed
solely for the purpose of consummating the merger. Merger Sub
has not carried on any activities to date, except for activities
incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in
connection with the merger.
The principal executive offices of Merger Sub are located at 68
South Service Road, Suite 230 Melville, New York
11747, and its telephone number is
(631) 962-7000.
CPI
CPI is a provider of microwave, radio frequency, power and
control products for critical defense, communications, medical,
scientific and other applications. CPI develops, manufactures
and distributes products used to generate, amplify, transmit and
receive high-power/high-frequency microwave and radio frequency
signals
and/or
provide power and control for various applications.
Approximately half of CPIs product sales for fiscal year
2009 were for United States and foreign government and military
end use, particularly for radar, electronic warfare and
communications applications. CPIs products are critical
elements of high-priority U.S. and foreign military
programs and platforms, including numerous planes, ships and
ground-based platforms. Defense applications of CPIs
products include transmitting and receiving radar signals for
locating and tracking threats, weapons guidance and navigation,
as well as transmitting decoy and jamming signals for electronic
warfare and transmitting signals for satellite communications.
The U.S. Government is CPIs only customer that
accounted for more than 10% of its sales in the last three
fiscal years.
In addition, CPI has applied its key technologies to commercial
end markets, including communications, medical, industrial and
scientific applications, which provide it with a diversified
base of sales. Approximately half of CPIs product sales
for fiscal year 2009 were for commercial applications.
CPI estimates that approximately 40% of its total sales for
fiscal year 2009 were generated from recurring sales of
replacements, spares and repairs, including upgraded
replacements for existing products. CPI believes that this
aspect of its business is inherently more stable and
predictable, and that it is less susceptible to dramatic shifts
in market conditions.
33
CPI is incorporated in Delaware. CPIs principal executive
offices are located at CPI International, Inc., 811 Hansen Way,
Palo Alto, California 94303, and its telephone number is
(650) 846-2900.
CPIs web site is www.cpii.com. Information on
CPIs web site is not incorporated into this proxy
statement/prospectus.
The principal trading market for CPIs common stock
(NASDAQGS: CPII) is the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
For a further discussion of CPIs business, we urge you to
read CPIs
Form 10-K,
incorporated by reference herein. See Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
34
SPECIAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF CPI
CPI is providing this proxy statement/prospectus to its
stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies to
be voted at the special meeting of stockholders that CPI has
called for the purpose of holding a vote upon a proposal to
adopt the merger agreement with Comtech and Merger Sub and at
any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy
statement/prospectus constitutes a prospectus for Comtech in
connection with the issuance by Comtech of its common stock in
connection with the merger. This proxy statement/prospectus is
first being mailed to CPI stockholders on or about
[l],
2010 and provides CPI stockholders with the information they
need to know to be able to vote or instruct their vote to be
cast at the special meeting of CPI stockholders.
Date,
Time and Place
The special meeting will be held at
[l]
on
[l],
2010 at 10:00 a.m., local time.
Purpose
At the special meeting, CPI stockholders will be asked to vote
solely on the following proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary,
to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes
to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting.
|
CPI Board
Recommendation
The CPI board of directors has unanimously determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger, are advisable and in the best interests of
CPI and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that you
vote FOR the adoption of the agreement and
FOR the adjournment of the special meeting,
if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of
the special meeting. See The Merger CPIs
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the CPI Board of
Directors beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
CPI stockholders should carefully read this proxy
statement/prospectus in its entirety for more detailed
information concerning the merger agreement and the merger. In
addition, CPI stockholders are urged to read the merger
agreement in its entirety because it is the legal document that
governs the merger. A copy of the merger agreement is attached
as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus.
CPI
Record Date; Outstanding Shares; Shares Entitled to
Vote
The record date for the CPI special meeting is
[l],
2010. Only CPI stockholders of record at the close of business
on
[l],
2010 will be entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
special meeting or any adjournment of the special meeting.
Shares of CPI common stock held by CPI as treasury shares and by
CPIs subsidiaries will not be entitled to vote.
As of the close of business on the record date of
[l],
2010, there were
[l] shares
of CPI common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the
special meeting. Each holder of CPI common stock is entitled to
one vote for each share of CPI common stock owned as of the
record date.
A complete list of CPI stockholders entitled to vote at the CPI
special meeting will be available for inspection at the
principal place of business of CPI during regular business hours
for a period of no less than 10 days before the special
meeting, as well as at the place of the CPI special meeting
during the meeting.
Quorum
A quorum of stockholders is required for CPI stockholders to
adopt the merger agreement at the special meeting, but not to
approve any adjournment of the meeting. The presence at the
special meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a
majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of CPI common
stock entitled to vote on the record date will constitute a
quorum. Proxies received but marked as abstentions, if any, will
be included in the
35
calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at
the meeting for quorum purposes. With respect to broker
non-votes (as defined below), the adoption of the merger
agreement is not considered a routine matter. Therefore, your
broker will not be permitted to vote on the adoption of the
merger agreement without instruction from you as the beneficial
owner of the shares of CPI common stock. Broker non-votes will,
however, be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum
is present at the special meeting.
Required
Vote
To adopt the merger agreement, holders of a majority of the
shares of CPI common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on
the proposal must vote in favor of adoption of the merger
agreement. Because approval is based on the affirmative vote
of a majority of the outstanding shares of CPI common stock, a
CPI stockholders failure to submit a proxy card or to vote
in person at the special meeting or an abstention from voting,
or the failure of a CPI stockholder who holds his or her shares
in street name through a broker or other nominee to
give voting instructions to such broker or other nominee, will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST adoption of
the merger agreement.
If there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement
at the time of the special meeting, a majority of the votes
present in person or by proxy (whether or not a quorum is
present) may adjourn the meeting to another time and place in
order to solicit additional proxies. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adjourn the special meeting.
Shares not in attendance at the special meeting will have no
effect on the outcome of any vote to adjourn the special meeting.
The
Voting and Standstill Agreement
Pursuant to a voting and standstill agreement entered into
concurrently with the merger agreement, the Cypress Group
stockholders have agreed to vote 49.9% of the outstanding shares
of CPI common stock in favor of the merger. However, if the CPI
board of directors changes its recommendation with respect to
the merger in connection with a superior acquisition proposal
(as such term is described in The Merger
Agreement Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus), the Cypress Group
stockholders will be obligated to vote only 25% of the
outstanding shares of CPI common stock in favor of the merger
and the remaining shares may be voted at the discretion of the
Cypress Group stockholders. If the CPI board of directors
changes its recommendation for any reason other than in
connection with a superior acquisition proposal, the Cypress
Group stockholders will still be obligated to vote 49.9% of the
outstanding shares of CPI common stock in favor of the merger
unless the
five-day
average closing price of Comtech common stock immediately prior
to the change of recommendation is less than $24.00. In
addition, the voting and standstill agreement includes
restrictions on the ability of the Cypress Group stockholders to
transfer their shares of CPIs common stock before the
merger and on their ability to transfer shares of Comtech common
stock received in the merger following the closing of the
merger. The voting and standstill agreement terminates upon the
earliest of (i) the mutual agreement of the Cypress Group
stockholders and Comtech, (ii) the termination of the
merger agreement or (iii) the second anniversary of the
merger.
Accordingly, the adoption of the merger agreement by CPI
stockholders is substantially assured as long as the voting and
standstill agreement remains in effect and the CPI board of
directors does not change its recommendation (i) in
response to a superior acquisition proposal or (ii) for any
other reason following a decline in the
five-day
average closing price of Comtechs common stock below
$24.00. For a more complete description of the voting and
standstill agreement, see The Voting and Standstill
Agreement beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus. The voting and
standstill agreement is also attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex B.
Stock
Ownership of and Voting by CPIs Directors and Executive
Officers
As of the record date, directors and executive officers of CPI
as a group beneficially owned and had the right to vote
[l] shares
of CPI common stock, entitling them to collectively cast
approximately
[l]%
of the votes entitled to be cast at the special meeting. This
does not include
[l] shares
of CPI common stock beneficially held by the Cypress Group
stockholders and certain of their affiliates as of the date of
this proxy statement/prospectus of which Mr. Hughes, one of
CPIs directors, may be deemed to have beneficial ownership
by virtue of his position as a
36
managing member of Cypress Associates II LLC. As noted
above, those affiliates have agreed collectively to vote a
portion of those shares (comprising 49.9% of the outstanding
shares of CPI common stock) in favor of the merger, subject to
certain exceptions. See The Voting and Standstill
Agreement beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
These
[l] shares
also include
[l] shares
that are subject to stock options that are or will be
exercisable by the holder within 60 days of the date
hereof, but which are not expected to be exercised prior to the
closing.
Except as described above as to shares held by the Cypress Group
stockholders, none of CPIs directors or officers has
entered into any agreement requiring them to vote for or against
the merger proposal.
Voting of
Shares by Holders of Record
By
Internet or Telephone
If you hold CPI shares directly in your name as a stockholder of
record, you may vote electronically via the Internet at
www.[l],
or telephonically by calling
[l].
Votes submitted telephonically or via the Internet must be
received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time) on
[l],
2010.
If you hold CPI shares in street name through a broker or other
nominee, you may vote electronically via the Internet at
www.[l].
If you wish to vote by telephone you will need to request paper
copies of the materials from your broker or other nominee in
order to obtain a Voting Instruction Form which contains a
specific telephone number for your broker or other nominee.
Votes submitted telephonically or via the Internet must be
received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time) on
[l],
2010.
In
Person
If you hold CPI shares directly in your name as a stockholder of
record, you may vote in person at the special meeting.
Stockholders of record also may be represented by another person
at the special meeting by executing a proper proxy designating
that person.
If you hold CPI shares in street name through a broker or other
nominee, you must obtain a legal proxy from that institution and
present it to the inspector of elections with your ballot to be
able to vote in person at the special meeting. To request a
legal proxy please follow the instructions at
www.[l].
By
Mail
If you hold CPI shares directly in your name as a stockholder of
record, you will need to mark, sign and date your proxy card and
return it using the pre-paid return envelope provided. CPI must
receive your proxy card no later than close of business on
[l],
2010.
If you hold CPI shares in street name through a broker or other
nominee, to vote by mail you must request paper copies of the
proxy materials from your broker or other nominee. Once you
receive your paper copies, you will need to mark, sign and date
the Voting Instruction Form and return it in the pre-paid
return envelope provided. Your Voting Instruction Form must
be received no later than the close of business on
[l],
2010.
When a stockholder submits a proxy by telephone or through the
Internet, his or her proxy is recorded immediately. CPI
encourages its stockholders to submit their proxies using these
methods whenever possible. If you submit a proxy by telephone or
via the Internet, please do not return your proxy card by mail.
If you attend the meeting, you may also submit your vote in
person. Any votes that you previously submitted
whether via the Internet, by telephone or by mail
will be superseded by the vote that you cast at the meeting.
All shares represented by each properly executed and valid proxy
received before the special meeting will be voted in accordance
with the instructions given on the proxy. If a CPI stockholder
executes a proxy card without giving instructions, the shares of
CPI common stock represented by that proxy card will be voted
FOR approval of the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement.
Your vote is important. Accordingly, please submit your proxy by
telephone, through the Internet or by mail, whether or not you
plan to attend the meeting in person.
37
Voting of
Shares Held in Street Name
If your shares are held in an account at a broker or through
another nominee, you must instruct the broker or other nominee
on how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting
instructions to your broker, your shares will not be voted on
any proposal on which your broker does not have discretionary
authority to vote. This is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus and in general as a broker non-vote. In
these cases, the broker or other nominee can register your
shares as being present at the special meeting for purposes of
determining a quorum, but will not be able to vote your shares
on those matters for which specific authorization is required.
Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Therefore, a broker
non-vote will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST
adoption of the merger agreement. A broker non-vote will have
the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal to
adjourn the special meeting.
Revocability
of Proxies; Changing Your Vote
You may revoke your proxy
and/or
change your vote at any time before your shares are voted at the
special meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you can do
this by:
|
|
|
|
|
sending a written notice stating that you revoke your proxy to
CPI International, Inc. at 811 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, California
94303, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The written notice must
bear a date later than the date of the proxy and be received
prior to the special meeting;
|
|
|
|
submitting a valid, later-dated proxy by mail, telephone or
Internet that is received prior to the special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting by ballot in person
(your attendance at the special meeting will not, by itself,
revoke any proxy that you have previously given).
|
If you hold your shares through a broker or other nominee, you
must contact your broker or other nominee to change your vote or
obtain a legal proxy to vote your shares if you wish
to cast your vote in person at the meeting.
Solicitation
of Proxies
This proxy statement/prospectus is furnished in connection with
the solicitation of proxies by the CPI board of directors to be
voted at the CPI special meeting. CPI will bear all costs and
expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies,
including the charges of brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees or fiduciaries for forwarding documents to security
owners. Proxies may also be solicited by certain of CPIs
directors, officers and employees by telephone, electronic mail,
letter, facsimile or in person, but no additional compensation
will be paid to them.
Stockholders should not send stock certificates with their
proxies. A letter of transmittal and instructions for the
surrender of CPI common stock certificates will be mailed to CPI
stockholders shortly after the completion of the merger, if
approved.
Stockholders
Sharing an Address
Consistent with notices sent to stockholders of record sharing a
single address, CPI is sending only one copy of this proxy
statement/prospectus to that address unless CPI received
contrary instructions from any stockholder at that address. This
householding practice reduces the volume of
duplicate information received at your household and helps CPI
reduce costs. Stockholders may request to discontinue
householding, or may request a separate copy of this proxy
statement/prospectus by one of the following methods:
|
|
|
|
|
stockholders of record wishing to discontinue or begin
householding, or any stockholder of record residing at a
household address wanting to request delivery of a copy of this
proxy statement/prospectus should contact CPI International,
Inc., 811 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, California 94303, Attention:
Investor Relations, telephone number
(650) 846-2900; and
|
|
|
|
stockholders owning their shares through a broker or nominee who
wish to either discontinue or begin householding should contact
their record holder.
|
38
No Other
Business
Under CPIs amended and restated bylaws, the business to be
conducted at the special meeting will be limited to the purposes
stated in the notice to CPI stockholders provided with this
proxy statement/prospectus.
Adjournments
Adjournments may be made for the purpose of, among other things,
soliciting additional proxies. Whether or not a quorum is
present, a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy
may adjourn the meeting to another time and place. CPI is not
required to notify stockholders of any adjournment of
30 days or less if the time and place of the adjourned
meeting are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is
taken, unless after the adjournment a new record date is fixed
for the adjourned meeting. At any adjourned meeting, CPI may
transact any business that it might have transacted at the
original meeting, provided that a quorum is present at such
adjourned meeting. Proxies submitted by CPI stockholders for use
at the special meeting will be used at any adjournment or
postponement of the meeting. References to the CPI special
meeting in this proxy statement/prospectus are to such special
meeting as adjourned or postponed.
Assistance
If you need assistance in completing your proxy card or have
questions regarding the special meeting, please contact CPI
International, Inc., 811 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, California
94303, Attention: Investor Relations.
39
THE
MERGER
General
On May 8, 2010, the CPI board of directors unanimously
approved and adopted the merger agreement that provides for the
acquisition by Comtech of CPI through a merger of Merger Sub
with and into Comtech. After the merger, CPI will be the
surviving entity and will be a wholly owned subsidiary of
Comtech. At the effective time of the merger, each share of CPI
common stock (other than shares owned by CPI, Comtech and Merger
Sub) will be converted into the right to receive a combination
of $9.00 in cash, without interest, and a fraction of a share of
Comtech common stock equal to $8.10 divided by the average
closing price of Comtech common stock over a specified period of
time prior to the effective date of the merger, provided that
the fraction shall not be greater than 0.2382 nor less than
0.2132. For information regarding the treatment of stock options
and restricted stock, see The Merger Agreement
Merger Consideration; Conversion or Cancellation of Shares in
the Merger Treatment of CPI Equity Awards
beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Background
of the Merger
The following is a summary of the meetings, negotiations,
material contacts and discussions between CPI and Comtech and
certain of their representatives and affiliates that preceded
the execution of the merger agreement.
Since CPIs initial public offering in April 2006, the CPI
board of directors and management have regularly focused on the
companys strategic plan and alternatives. As part of this
process, the CPI board of directors and management have assessed
strategic transactions in order to enhance the ability of CPI to
maximize stockholder value. The acquisition of Malibu Research
Associates, Inc. in 2007 resulted from this process.
Comtech and its board of directors continually review strategic
alternatives which include evaluating mergers and strategic
combinations with numerous companies of different sizes and a
variety of business models.
In the period before January 2008, limited discussions took
place between CPI, Comtech and representatives of Cypress
Associates II LLC (the entity which controls the Cypress
Group stockholders and which is referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as Cypress) regarding the potential
acquisition by Comtech of CPI. CPI did not formally engage a
financial advisor in connection with these discussions, and
these discussions, which ceased in January 2008, did not
progress beyond a preliminary stage.
In January 2008, Comtech entered into a confidentiality
agreement with Radyne Corporation. Comtech announced its
agreement to acquire Radyne Corporation on May 12, 2008,
and closed the transaction on August 1, 2008. During the
period between August 2008 and January 2009, Comtech and its
management team integrated the Radyne acquisition.
In January 2009, Comtech inquired with Cypress as to whether
Cypress would be interested in considering the possible
strategic and financial merits of a potential acquisition of CPI
by Comtech.
On February 25, 2009, Comtech management made a
presentation to Cypress at Cypress offices regarding a
possible merger between Comtech and CPI.
On April 15, 2009, CPI and Comtech executed a nondisclosure
agreement.
On April 16, 2009, management of CPI provided a briefing
regarding CPIs business to Comtech management by telephone.
On April 23, 2009, Mr. Jeffrey Hughes and
Mr. Christopher Harned from Cypress received a presentation
from Comtech management at Comtechs head office in Long
Island, New York regarding, in the view of Comtech management,
the benefits to CPI of a combination with Comtech.
During May 2009 and June 2009, CPI provided Comtech with a
variety of information and materials regarding CPIs
business.
40
On July 1, 2009, J.P. Morgan presented an analysis
regarding the potential acquisition of CPI by Comtech to
representatives of CPI.
On August 26, 2009, representatives of Cypress met with
Comtech management at Comtechs offices and received an
updated presentation from Comtech regarding the benefits to CPI
of a merger with Comtech.
On September 19, 2009, the Cypress Group stockholders
executed a nondisclosure agreement with Comtech with respect to
certain Comtech business and financial information to be
provided to Cypress.
On September 29, 2009, J.P. Morgan made a presentation
to representatives of Cypress and Mr. O. Joe Caldarelli, Chief
Executive Officer of CPI and member of the CPI board of
directors at Cypress offices in New York regarding an
analysis of a potential transaction between Comtech and CPI as
well as strategic alternatives.
On October 1, 2009, CPI provided a summary of CPIs
fiscal year 2010 and five-year financial projections to Cypress
to provide to Comtech. Cypress provided these projections to
Comtech on October 15, 2009.
On October 15, 2009, representatives of Cypress met with
Comtech management at Cypress offices and received from
Comtech management a presentation regarding the benefits to
CPIs stockholders of a merger with Comtech.
As part of its strategic planning, CPI from time to time
evaluates potential acquisitions. During the period described in
this section, CPI submitted a bid to acquire another company in
a related industry. That bid was not successful.
In addition, throughout 2009, Comtech management provided
regular updates to the Comtech board of directors regarding the
preliminary discussions with CPI, with the Comtech board of
directors instructing Comtech management to pursue discussions
in order to determine if a transaction would be beneficial to
Comtech.
On January 27, 2010, Mr. Hughes, a managing member of
Cypress and Mr. Fred Kornberg, the Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President of Comtech, had a
telephone conversation regarding a potential acquisition of CPI
by Comtech, including a discussion of a range of pricing and the
composition of the consideration.
On February 2, 2010, Mr. Caldarelli provided updated
CPI financial information to Mr. Harned and Mr. Hughes, which
Cypress in turn provided to Comtech with the authorization of
CPI.
On February 6, 2010, Mr. Caldarelli provided updated
financial CPI information to Mr. Jerome Kapelus,
Comtechs Senior Vice President, Strategy and Business
Development.
On February
16-17, 2010,
certain members of Comtechs management (including
Mr. Kornberg, Mr. Michael Porcelain, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Comtech, and
Mr. Kapelus) visited CPIs Canadian facilities for
presentations regarding two of CPIs operating divisions.
During that visit, Mr. Kornberg inquired whether CPI
management would be interested in continuing to work for CPI if
CPI were to be acquired by Comtech in a merger transaction.
Mr. Caldarelli confirmed that members of CPI management
would generally be interested in continuing employment if such a
transaction were to occur.
On February 23, 2010, the CPI board of directors held a
regularly scheduled meeting. At that meeting, members of CPI
management and Mr. Hughes updated the CPI board members on
the status of their discussions with Comtech. Mr. Hughes
indicated to the CPI board of directors that from the Cypress
Group stockholders perspective, a transaction in which the
stockholders of CPI could receive an interest in Comtech would
be attractive to Cypress. Mr. Hughes also indicated that
the Cypress Group stockholders would be interested in a
potential transaction, in which the consideration to be received
would consist of a combination of approximately $9.00 in cash
and 0.225 shares of Comtech common stock per share of CPI
common stock.
On February 26, 2010, Mr. Porcelain called
Mr. Joel Littman, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary of CPI, and discussed the due diligence which Comtech
would need to complete in connection with a strategic
transaction. Mr. Porcelain discussed potentially setting a
target to sign a definitive agreement by mid-March 2010.
41
On February 26, 2010, the CPI board of directors held a
special telephonic meeting to discuss the status of the
discussions with Comtech. Also in attendance were
representatives of J.P. Morgan, Irell & Manella
LLP (which is referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as
Irell), CPIs legal counsel, and Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell LLP (referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as Morris Nichols), special Delaware
counsel. Representatives of Irell and Morris Nichols reviewed
with the directors certain legal matters regarding the
discussions with Comtech, including the directors
fiduciary obligations. Representatives of J.P. Morgan made
a presentation to the board of directors regarding strategic
alternatives. J.P. Morgan was subsequently engaged by CPI
to act as its financial advisor in connection with a potential
strategic transaction involving CPI.
During the period described in this section, CPI did not
formally solicit offers from potential acquirers other than
Comtech. CPIs financial advisors advised CPI that the
universe of potential strategic buyers was limited and that,
based on informal historical discussions between CPIs
financial advisors and such entities, the potential strategic
buyers other than Comtech were unlikely to make an attractive
offer for CPI. In addition, CPI chose not to solicit offers from
potential financial buyers such as private equity funds because
CPI was advised that financial buyers were unlikely to make an
offer for CPI that would be as attractive as an offer from
Comtech. Based on this advice, CPI did not solicit formal offers
from other parties because the CPI board of directors felt that
the probability that such solicitations would result in a more
attractive offer was low and that soliciting other offers might
jeopardize a potential transaction with Comtech. However,
because no formal solicitation process was conducted prior to
executing the merger agreement, CPI insisted on having the right
to terminate the merger agreement (subject to payment of a
reasonable termination fee) in order to ensure that other
potential acquirers could submit offers for CPI after the merger
agreement was announced.
On March 1, 2010, the CPI board of directors held a special
telephonic meeting to discuss the status of the discussions with
Comtech. Also in attendance were representatives of Irell and
Morris Nichols. The CPI board of directors discussed the
appropriate procedures to be followed in connection with
Comtechs expression of interest. After receiving input
from legal counsel, the CPI board of directors voted to
establish two committees consisting of members of the CPI board
of directors to evaluate Comtechs expression of interest.
The first was the transaction committee, to which the CPI board
of directors appointed Mr. Caldarelli, Mr. Hughes and
Mr. Michael Finley. The role of the transaction committee
was to engage in negotiations and discussions with respect to
Comtechs expression of interest and alternatives thereto.
The second committee established was a special committee
consisting of three non-management directors who were determined
to be independent from the Cypress Group stockholders,
Mr. Finley, Mr. William Rutledge and Mr. Michael
Targoff. The special committee was formed for the purpose of
reviewing, evaluating and, as appropriate, negotiating or
participating in negotiations with respect to Comtechs
expression of interest and alternatives thereto. The CPI board
of directors determined that no transaction could proceed unless
the special committee approved the transaction. The special
committee was also given the power to retain its own legal and
financial advisors. The special committee engaged Morris Nichols
as its legal counsel.
During March 2010, members of CPI management made available to
members of Comtech management and to Comtechs legal,
financial and other advisors due diligence materials relating to
CPI, and members of Comtech management conducted site visits at
certain CPI facilities. During this period, members of CPI
management and its legal and financial advisors also conducted
due diligence and reviewed materials related to Comtech.
Also beginning in March 2010 and continuing through the
execution of the merger agreement, members of Comtech management
provided the Comtech board of directors with detailed briefings
as to the status, proposed terms and outstanding issues of the
potential transaction with CPI. The Comtech board of directors
also had discussions on several occasions with Comtechs
legal counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
LLP (referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as Skadden)
and Proskauer Rose LLP (referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as Proskauer), as well as Comtechs
financial advisor, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (referred to in
this proxy/prospectus as Citigroup). In addition, throughout
this period, the Comtech board of directors received and
reviewed several financial due-diligence reports in connection
with the potential transaction from its accounting advisers,
KPMG LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
42
On March 3, 2010, a telephonic meeting of CPIs
special committee was held, with representatives of Morris
Nichols in attendance. The special committee discussed the
committees role and authority and the potential hiring of
a financial advisor for the special committee.
On March 4, 2010, representatives of Skadden contacted
representatives of Irell and described the broad outlines of
Comtechs views as to the potential structure of a
transaction between Comtech and CPI. Following this discussion,
on March 10, 2010, Comtech sent to CPI a proposed term
sheet for a potential merger transaction as well as a term sheet
relating to the employment of CPI senior executives following
the potential transaction. The merger term sheet did not
indicate a proposed price to be paid by Comtech in connection
with a potential merger. The employment term sheet was included
because Comtech had indicated that the continued commitment of
senior executives was an important factor in Comtechs
interest in pursuing a transaction.
On March 11, 2010, a telephonic meeting of CPIs
special committee was held, with representatives of Morris
Nichols in attendance. The special committee discussed the
engagement of a financial advisor to advise the special
committee as well as the term sheet that had been sent to CPI by
Comtech. The special committee subsequently engaged Moelis to
act as its financial advisor. The special committee determined
that the term sheet raised a number of issues that needed to be
addressed and that members of CPIs management should be
instructed not to engage in discussions on the terms of their
subsequent employment arrangements with Comtech until a later
time.
On March 12, 2010, certain members of CPI management, along
with representatives of J.P. Morgan, Moelis and Cypress,
attended a meeting at Comtechs headquarters where Comtech
executives made a presentation regarding Comtechs
business. Mr. Finley and Mr. Rutledge, members of the
special committee of the CPI board of directors, attended the
meeting by telephone. As part of this meeting CPI
representatives asked due diligence questions regarding
Comtechs business and prospects.
On March 14, 2010, CPIs transaction committee
(Mr. Caldarelli, Mr. Finley and Mr. Hughes),
Mr. Harned of Cypress and representatives of Irell and
Morris Nichols discussed the issues related to the proposed term
sheet and formulated proposed responses.
On March 15, 2010, Mr. Harned and representatives of
J.P. Morgan, at the request of CPIs transaction
committee, discussed the proposed term sheet with
Mr. Kapelus of Comtech.
On March 17 and 19, 2010, representatives of Irell, Morris
Nichols and Skadden, along with representatives of
J.P. Morgan, Moelis and Cypress discussed issues related to
the proposed term sheet.
On March 22, 2010, representatives of J.P. Morgan and
representatives of Citigroup spoke regarding the status of the
proposed transaction. The representatives agreed that the most
important next step was for Comtech to make a more formal
proposal (including price) to CPI.
On March 24, 2010, a telephonic meeting of CPIs
special committee was held, with representatives of Morris
Nichols in attendance. The special committee discussed the
status and terms of Comtechs proposal and Moelis
analysis of the proposal to date.
Following the discussions between representatives of CPI and
Comtech regarding the initial term sheet, on March 25,
2010, representatives of Citigroup and Skadden sent a revised
term sheet regarding the potential transaction to
J.P. Morgan and Irell.
On March 27 and 28, 2010, representatives of J.P. Morgan
and Citigroup discussed the status of the proposed transaction
and the best method for advancing dialogue.
On March 30, 2010, the members of CPIs special
committee held a telephonic meeting, with representatives of
Morris Nichols in attendance, to discuss Comtechs proposed
term sheet and develop a proposed response. In particular, the
members of the special committee expressed their objections to
the provisions (described as force-the-vote
provisions) proposed by Comtech in its term sheet which would
prohibit CPI from terminating the proposed merger agreement in
the event that CPI received a superior proposal after the merger
agreement was signed. The special committee also expressed the
view that the CPI board of directors would need to have the
right to change its recommendation regarding the transaction in
certain circumstances.
43
On March 31, 2010, the members of CPIs transaction
committee (Mr. Caldarelli, Mr. Finley and
Mr. Hughes) and Mr. Harned of Cypress had a
teleconference, with representatives of J.P. Morgan, Irell
and Moelis in attendance, in which they discussed the special
committees proposed response and expressed their agreement
with the proposed response. The next day a revised version of
the term sheet was sent to Skadden reflecting this response.
On April 8, 2010, Comtech sent a letter to the CPI board of
directors setting forth Comtechs non-binding proposal to
acquire all of the outstanding common stock of CPI in a merger
transaction in which the stockholders of CPI would receive
consideration consisting of between $8.00 to $9.00 in cash per
share plus 0.225 shares of Comtech common stock for each
share of CPI common stock. Comtech included a further revised
term sheet with the letter setting forth the principal proposed
legal terms of the proposed transaction. The letter also
indicated that Comtech would be reluctant to continue
negotiations regarding a potential merger without the continuing
commitment of key CPI executives.
On April 9, 2010, the members of CPIs transaction
committee (Mr. Caldarelli, Mr. Finley and
Mr. Hughes), together with representatives of
J.P. Morgan, held a teleconference in which they discussed
the letter from Comtech. Later that day, CPIs entire board
of directors met via telephone, with representatives of
J.P. Morgan, Moelis, Irell and Morris Nichols in
attendance, as well as Mr. Harned of Cypress. The CPI board
of directors discussed the terms of Comtechs letter and
revised term sheet and directed J.P. Morgan to communicate
to Citigroup that the members of the board were disappointed
with the economic and legal terms of Comtechs proposal.
J.P. Morgan communicated this message to Citigroup later
that evening.
That same day, a telephonic meeting of CPIs special
committee was held, with representatives of Morris Nichols and
Moelis in attendance. The special committee discussed the terms
of Comtechs proposal and approved the communications
strategy for discussions with Comtech as agreed upon at the
earlier board meeting. J.P. Morgan communicated to
Citigroup later that evening the response approved by the CPI
board of directors and the special committee.
On April 10, 2010, Mr. Kornberg called
Mr. Caldarelli to discuss whether the parties should
continue their discussions in light of the concerns communicated
by J.P. Morgan to Citigroup. Mr. Caldarelli indicated
that the CPI board of directors was prepared to continue
discussions.
On April 13, 2010, a telephonic meeting of the CPI board of
directors was held. Representatives of J.P. Morgan, Moelis,
Irell and Morris Nichols were also in attendance.
J.P. Morgan made a presentation to the CPI board of
directors regarding J.P. Morgans preliminary views as
to the value of CPI as well as CPIs potential strategic
alternatives.
Later that day, CPIs special committee held a telephonic
meeting, with representatives of Morris Nichols and Moelis in
attendance. The special committee discussed
J.P. Morgans presentation along with Moelis and
Morris Nichols. Members of the special committee expressed their
views as to the terms and price currently offered by Comtech.
On April 14, 2010, the CPI board of directors held a
telephonic meeting, with representatives of J.P. Morgan,
Moelis, Irell and Morris Nichols in attendance. At the board
meeting, Mr. Targoff summarized for the other board members
of CPI the special committees preliminary views on certain
elements of the Comtech proposal. The CPI board of directors
discussed the impact of changes in Comtechs stock price on
the deal value and discussed potential pricing arrangements that
would employ a collar mechanism to address the
effect that changes in the value of the Comtech common stock
between signing and closing would have on the number of shares
of Comtech common stock issued in respect of each share of CPI
common stock. The CPI board of directors asked questions of
legal counsel regarding certain legal implications of the
proposal, including the force-the-vote provision
proposed by Comtech. The CPI board of directors directed
J.P. Morgan to communicate to Citigroup that: (i) the
board wanted Comtechs proposal to reflect a minimum value
of $17.10 per share at the time of signing; (ii) the board
would not be prepared to agree to the force-the-vote
provision requested by Comtech; and (iii) the board would
not agree to breakup fees that were in excess of market levels.
On April 15, 2010, representatives of J.P. Morgan
spoke with Citigroup and communicated the position of the CPI
board of directors with respect to the Comtech proposal.
44
On April 16, 2010, Mr. Caldarelli called
Mr. Kornberg and discussed the status of the parties
discussions. In addition, on April 16, 2010 Comtech sent a
letter to the CPI board of directors containing a modified
nonbinding proposal to acquire CPI. Under this proposal, each
share of CPI common stock would be converted into $9.00 in cash
and 0.225 shares of Comtech common stock. This proposal was
contingent upon CPI agreeing to include a
force-the-vote provision in the final agreement and
agreeing to a breakup fee proposed by Comtech. Since CPI
management, as directed by CPIs special committee, had not
engaged in discussions regarding the terms of their continued
employment with Comtech, the letter also requested that CPI
management engage in immediate discussions with Comtech
regarding their future roles at Comtech.
On April 19, 2010, the CPI board of directors held a
telephonic meeting. The CPI board of directors discussed
Comtechs April 16 letter and the fact that Comtech had not
accepted CPIs positions. The CPI board of directors
instructed J.P. Morgan to reiterate the positions it had
communicated on April 15, 2010. In addition, the CPI board
of directors concluded that it would be desirable to receive a
draft merger agreement rather than continue to exchange term
sheets. The CPI board of directors also concluded, based on the
lack of agreement on key terms, that CPI management should
continue to not engage in discussions with Comtech regarding
their potential future employment by Comtech.
On April 20, 2010, representatives of J.P. Morgan
spoke with Citigroup and Comtech and communicated the positions
of the CPI board of directors. Comtech indicated that it was not
in a position to commit to a minimum value of $17.10 per share
at signing, but that a collar structure might provide a solution
to the gap between the parties on price.
Following these discussions, on April 22, 2010, Skadden
sent to Irell initial drafts of a merger agreement and voting
and standstill agreement as well as draft employment letters for
certain of CPIs executive officers.
On April 24, 2010, representatives of J.P. Morgan
spoke to representatives of Citigroup regarding process-related
matters and potential methods for facilitating resolution of
open issues.
On April 25, 2010, a telephonic meeting of the CPI board of
directors was held. The CPI board of directors discussed the
terms of the draft merger agreement and directed
J.P. Morgan to communicate again the boards positions
regarding the price which the board would expect to apply at
execution, as well as the force-the-vote provisions
in the draft merger agreement, the provisions restricting the
board of directors ability to change its recommendation
under certain circumstances and the provisions limiting
Comtechs obligations to pursue certain regulatory
approvals. The CPI board of directors instructed its legal
advisors to prepare proposed changes to the draft merger
agreement.
On April 26, 2010, representatives of J.P. Morgan
called Citigroup and informed Citigroup that the legal advisors
to CPI would be sending comments on the proposed merger
agreement but that CPI did not want to engage in detailed
negotiations on the contract until the price issues and the
principal contractual issues (i.e., force-the-vote;
ability of the CPI board of directors to change its
recommendation; and regulatory approval conditions) were
resolved. Later that day, the legal advisors to CPI sent to
Skadden comments on the proposed merger agreement.
On April 27, 2010, representatives of J.P. Morgan
spoke with representatives of Citigroup regarding the proposed
merger agreement.
In addition, on April 27, 2010, CPI held a telephonic board
meeting in which J.P. Morgan summarized its recent
communications with Citigroup and Comtech. J.P. Morgan also
made a presentation to the CPI board of directors regarding
potential collar structures. After discussion of the status of
the negotiations between the parties, the CPI board of directors
concluded that it was not willing to concede on its key
negotiating points (i.e., price; force-the-vote;
ability of the CPI board of directors to change its
recommendation; and regulatory approval conditions).
The special committee of the CPI board of directors also met
telephonically that day, with representatives of Morris Nichols
in attendance. The special committee approved the payment by CPI
of attorneys fees in connection with the review of
possible employment agreements between Comtech and members of
CPIs management as well as the voting and standstill
agreement being negotiated between the Cypress funds and Comtech.
45
On April 28, 2010, Mr. Porcelain inquired whether CPI
executives were in a position to begin discussions with Comtech
regarding the proposed employment contracts between Comtech and
the executives. On April 29, 2010, Mr. Littman
informed Mr. Porcelain that, while the executives had begun
analyzing the proposal, they had not yet been authorized by the
CPI board of directors to begin discussions with Comtech on the
topic.
The special committee of the CPI board of directors also met
telephonically that day, with representatives of Morris Nichols
and Moelis in attendance. The special committee received and
discussed a presentation from Moelis as to the value of CPI as
well as CPIs potential strategic alternatives. The special
committee also discussed the status of discussions with Comtech
and the special committees views relating to a collar
structure. After the meeting, the special committee communicated
those views to CPIs transaction committee and
J.P. Morgan.
On April 29, 2010, representatives of Skadden, Comtech,
Cypress and Golenbock, Eiseman, Assor, Bell & Peskoe,
counsel for the Cypress Group stockholders, discussed the
proposed voting and standstill agreement to be entered into
between the Cypress Group stockholders and Comtech.
On April 29, 2010, the CPI board of directors held a
telephonic meeting. Mr. Hughes reported to the CPI board of
directors the discussions with Comtech that representatives of
Cypress had regarding the provisions of the voting and
standstill agreement. The board discussed whether management
should be permitted to commence discussions with Comtech
regarding the proposed terms of their employment by Comtech.
After discussion and advice of counsel, the CPI board of
directors concluded that, in light of its position on certain
key negotiating points, permitting executives to commence
discussions on those agreements would be in the best interest of
CPI and therefore authorized the executives to commence
discussions with Comtech on those matters.
Later on April 29, 2010, Skadden contacted Irell suggesting
that CPI management begin discussions with Comtech on their
proposed employment arrangements and that in-person meetings be
set up to advance the negotiations on the merger agreement.
On April 30, 2010, Mr. Kornberg placed phone calls to
each of the directors of CPI separately. He advised each of the
directors with whom he was able to speak that Comtech continued
to be interested in pursuing a transaction with CPI and that
Comtech would be sending an offer letter containing modified
terms on key points. Shortly after these discussions, Comtech
sent a letter to the CPI board of directors containing what
Comtech described as Comtechs final proposal to the board.
In that letter, Comtech indicated that it was willing to provide
CPI stockholders with consideration equal to $17.10 per share at
the time of signing, consisting of $9.00 in cash and $8.10 worth
of Comtech common stock, subject to a collar mechanism. Under
Comtechs proposed collar mechanism, the amount of stock
received by CPI stockholders when the merger closed would depend
on the Comtech common stock price during a specified period
prior to the closing. If the Comtech common stock price during
the specified period fell within a predetermined range, the
exchange ratio for Comtech common stock would float such that
CPI stockholders would receive $8.10 worth of Comtech common
stock for each share of CPI common stock. If the Comtech common
stock price prior to the closing was outside the predetermined
range, the amount of Comtech common stock payable with respect
to each CPI share would be a fixed ratio, which would vary
depending on whether the stock price was less than or greater
than the range. The range and the fixed ratios would be
determined based on the price of the Comtech common stock at
signing.
In its April 30, 2010 letter, Comtech also indicated that:
(i) Comtech was willing to remove the
force-the-vote provision from the merger agreement;
(ii) Comtech was willing to agree to a termination fee of
$12 million if the merger agreement were terminated due to
a superior proposal; and (iii) while Comtech continued to
expect that members of CPI management would play meaningful
roles in a combined company (and Comtech separately indicated to
the members of CPI management Comtechs continued desire to
enter arrangements for ongoing employment with each executive),
Comtech did not want the logistical difficulties of negotiating
employment agreements to delay arriving at a definitive merger
agreement, and therefore Comtechs proposal was no longer
contingent on CPI management entering into employment
arrangements with Comtech.
On May 2, 2010, the CPI board of directors held a
telephonic board meeting, with representatives of
J.P. Morgan, Moelis, Irell and Morris Nichols in
attendance. The CPI board of directors discussed the collar
structure that had been proposed by Comtech as well as potential
alternatives to the proposed collar structure. After discussion,
the CPI board of directors directed J.P. Morgan to submit a
counterproposal to Comtech. In addition, at
46
the meeting, legal advisors to CPI summarized the open legal
issues on the merger agreement for the CPI board of directors.
The board authorized Mr. Caldarelli to provide guidance to
CPIs financial advisors and legal advisors in connection
with the negotiations over the next few days, subject to the
right of CPIs special committee and board of directors to
approve any transaction presented. In light of this role,
Mr. Caldarelli suspended his discussions and negotiations
regarding his potential employment with Comtech following the
merger.
On May 3, 2010, J.P. Morgan communicated CPIs
counterproposal on pricing to Citigroup. Under the CPI
counterproposal, (i) Comtech would provide consideration to
the CPI stockholders with a value at the date of signing equal
to $17.10 per share, consisting of $9.00 in cash and $8.10 in
Comtech common stock; (ii) if the price of Comtech common
stock at the time of the closing was greater than or equal to
the price at the time of signing but equal to or less than
$36.00 per share, the value of the Comtech common stock to be
provided at closing would remain at $8.10 per share;
(iii) if the price of Comtech common stock at the time of
the closing was less than the price at the time of signing, the
number of shares of Comtech common stock to be received for each
share of CPI common stock would be equal to $8.10 divided by the
price of the Comtech common stock at the time of signing; and
(iv) if the price of Comtech common stock at the time of
the closing was greater than $36.00 per share, Comtech would
provide 0.225 shares of Comtech common stock per share of
CPI common stock.
Between May 3 and May 6, 2010, numerous discussions took
place between Mr. Caldarelli and J.P. Morgan on behalf
of CPI and Citigroup, Mr. Porcelain and Mr. Kapelus on
behalf of Comtech with respect to the price to be paid in the
proposed transaction. Comtech did not accept CPIs most
recent pricing proposal, but indicated that Comtech might be
open to minor adjustments to Comtechs proposed collar
mechanism provided that the collar was centered and symmetrical
around a $36.00 per share Comtech common stock price.
Between May 3 and May 7, 2010, CPIs and Cypress
legal representatives had conference calls with Skadden and
exchanged drafts regarding open issues on the merger agreement
and the voting and standstill agreement.
On May 6, 2010, a telephonic meeting of the Comtech board
of directors was convened and attended by certain members of
Comtechs senior management as well as representatives of
Skadden, Proskauer and Citigroup. Comtechs senior
management updated the Comtech board of directors on discussions
with CPI. Representatives of Citigroup discussed the proposed
collar mechanism and the negotiations regarding the proposed
transaction. Comtechs management discussed with the
Comtech board of directors the rationale for the transaction.
Also at the meeting, the representatives of Skadden provided an
overview of the proposed merger, including the material
transaction terms set forth in the draft merger agreement and
voting and standstill agreement previously provided to the
Comtech board of directors, and reviewed certain legal matters
relating to the board of directors consideration of the
proposed merger. Following discussions regarding the merits of
the proposed merger with CPI, the Comtech board of directors
agreed that management should continue its discussions with CPI
with a view to management presenting a possible transaction for
approval to the Comtech board of directors as early as the next
day.
On May 6, 2010, a telephonic meeting of the special
committee of the CPI board of directors was held, with
representatives of Moelis, Morris Nichols and Irell in
attendance. At the request of the special committee,
Mr. Caldarelli was also invited to attend a portion of the
meeting to report on the progress of the negotiations.
Mr. Caldarelli and CPIs legal representatives updated
the members of the special committee regarding the status of the
negotiations of the merger agreement, described the open legal
points and answered the directors questions regarding the
terms and provisions of the proposed agreement.
Later on May 6, 2010 a conference call took place in which
Mr. Caldarelli updated certain members of the CPI board of
directors on the status of the deal discussions, including
Comtechs rejection of CPIs revised pricing proposal.
Representatives of J.P. Morgan and Irell were also on the
call. Because of where the Comtech common stock price was at
that time (around $32.00 per share) the collar structure in the
form proposed by Comtech at that time was viewed as unattractive
as the Comtech common stock price would have to increase by 25%
(to around $40.00 per share) before the CPI stockholders could
benefit from the increase in the Comtech common stock price. It
was suggested that Mr. Caldarelli explore with Comtech the
possibility of reverting to Comtechs original proposal of
$9.00 in cash plus 0.225 shares of Comtech common stock.
This would not meet the goal of having a value of $17.10 per
share at the time of signing but would provide potentially
greater upside to the CPI stockholders.
47
Following the call with certain members of the CPI board of
directors, Mr. Caldarelli held discussions with
Mr. Kornberg, Mr. Porcelain and Mr. Kapelus of
Comtech to explore structures that would provide greater
potential upside to CPI stockholders in the event that the price
of Comtechs common stock increased.
On May 7, 2010 Mr. Porcelain and Mr. Kapelus told
Mr. Caldarelli that the Comtech board was not willing to
revert to the original proposal of $9.00 per share plus
0.225 shares of Comtech common stock and that the only
price proposal on the table was the April 30, 2010 collar
proposal. Mr. Kornberg also made a call to
Mr. Caldarelli in which he expressed a similar message.
Mr. Caldarelli inquired whether Comtech was open to
adjustments to the collar formula. Mr. Kornberg indicated
that Comtech might be open to a modest, symmetrical (e.g.,
centered around $36.00) adjustment to the collar formula.
Also on May 7, 2010, the CPI board of directors held a
telephonic board meeting, with representatives of
J.P. Morgan, Moelis, Irell and Morris Nichols in
attendance. At the meeting, Mr. Caldarelli updated the
members of the CPI board of directors regarding the open issues
with respect to price, and indicated that Comtech had expressed
a willingness to entertain modest modifications to its original
collar proposal. J.P. Morgan made a presentation to the CPI
board of directors regarding the impact of Comtechs
original collar proposal under various Comtech common stock
price scenarios. A potential counterproposal was discussed which
would narrow the range of the collar, and J.P. Morgan
discussed the impact of that counterproposal under various
Comtech common stock price ranges. Under the counterproposal,
the value of the stock portion of the consideration would be
$8.10 per share as long as Comtechs stock price was
between $34.00 and $38.00 prior to the closing of the merger. If
the Comtech common stock price prior to the closing were $34.00
or lower, the stock portion of the consideration would be based
on 0.2382 shares of Comtech common stock. If the Comtech
common stock price prior to the closing were $38.00 or higher,
the stock portion of the consideration would be based on
0.2132 shares of Comtech common stock. After discussion,
the CPI board of directors decided that even though the
counterproposal could present a lower value at signing than
Comtechs April 30 collar proposal, the counterproposal
could be to the likely benefit of CPIs stockholders
because it permitted greater participation in the upside in the
Comtech common stock, and the CPI board of directors authorized
Mr. Caldarelli and J.P. Morgan to make the proposal to
Comtech. In addition, the board agreed that CPI should propose
to Comtech that the shares of CPI common stock held by the
Cypress Group stockholders would be partially freed up from the
voting agreement in the event of a change in recommendation by
the CPI board of directors if the Comtech common stock price was
less than $24.00 per share at the time of the change in
recommendation. In addition, Mr. Caldarelli and CPIs
legal counsel summarized the status of the other open points on
the draft merger agreement.
Following that meeting J.P. Morgan communicated the revised
collar proposal to Citigroup and Comtech. Comtech later notified
CPI that the proposal was acceptable, subject to approval by the
Comtech board of directors.
In the evening of May 7, 2010, CPIs special committee
held a telephonic meeting, with representatives of Moelis and
Morris Nichols in attendance. Mr. Caldarelli was invited to
attend a portion of the meeting to provide an update as to the
status of negotiations on the merger agreement. In addition,
representatives of Irell were in attendance for a portion of the
meeting. CPIs legal advisors updated the committee members
regarding the status of negotiations on the merger agreement,
and reviewed certain of the provisions of the draft merger
agreement. Mr. Caldarelli and the representatives of Irell
left the meeting and the members of the special committee
discussed the proposed transaction. Moelis delivered to the
special committee its oral opinion, dated May 7, 2010,
subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of that date and
based on and subject to the various factors, assumptions,
limitations and qualifications set forth in such written
opinion, the per share merger consideration to be received by
CPIs stockholders, pursuant to the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, was fair, from
a financial point of view, to CPIs stockholders (other
than the Cypress Group and its affiliates). Following such
opinion, the members of the special committee unanimously
adopted resolutions recommending that the entire CPI board of
directors adopt and approve the proposed transaction.
Following the meeting of the CPI special committee, later on
May 7, 2010, the CPI board of directors held a telephonic
meeting. Representatives of J.P. Morgan, Moelis, Morris
Nichols and Irell were in attendance. Mr. Frederick
Alexander of Morris Nichols informed the CPI board of directors
that the special committee had unanimously approved the proposed
transaction and had recommended that the entire CPI board of
directors adopt and approve the transaction. The CPI board of
directors then discussed the proposed transaction, including the
48
pricing and the progress of the negotiations. J.P. Morgan
presented to the CPI board of directors its financial analysis
of the proposed transaction and described how the proposed
collar mechanism would work. J.P. Morgan delivered its oral
opinion dated May 7, 2010, subsequently confirmed in
writing, that, as of that date and based on and subject to the
various factors, assumptions and limitations set forth in such
written opinion the per share merger consideration to be
received by holders of CPI common stock (other than the Cypress
Group and its affiliates) in the proposed merger was fair, from
a financial point of view, to such holders. The CPI board of
directors engaged in further discussion and then unanimously
approved the proposed merger.
Late in the evening on May 7, 2010, the Comtech board of
directors convened a telephonic meeting to review and consider
the proposed merger. Present at the meeting were members of
Comtechs senior management and representatives of Skadden,
Proskauer and Citigroup. At the meeting, Comtechs senior
management briefed the board of directors on negotiations that
had occurred since their last update and reviewed the merits of
the transaction and recommended in favor of a transaction on the
terms presented. Representatives of Citigroup reviewed with the
Comtech board of directors certain financial aspects of the
proposed merger, and a representative of Skadden discussed with
the board of directors certain material terms of the merger
agreement and the voting and standstill agreement and certain
legal matters relating to the Comtech board of directors
consideration of the proposed merger. Following consideration of
the terms of the proposed merger and discussion among the
directors, senior management and Comtechs legal and
financial advisors, early in the morning of May 8, 2010,
the Comtech board of directors unanimously approved the proposed
merger and authorized management to enter into the merger
agreement and the voting and standstill agreement.
On May 8, 2010, the CPI board of directors approved the
final version of the merger agreement, CPI and Comtech executed
and delivered the merger agreement and Comtech and the Cypress
Group stockholders executed and delivered the voting and
standstill agreement. On May 10, 2010, prior to the
commencement of trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, CPI
and Comtech issued a joint press release announcing the signing
of the merger agreement and the voting and standstill agreement.
CPIs
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the CPI Board of
Directors
The CPI board of directors carefully evaluated the merger
agreement and the merger. The CPI board of directors unanimously
determined that the merger agreement and the merger are
advisable and in the best interests of, CPI and its
stockholders, and unanimously recommended that the stockholders
of CPI vote FOR the adoption of the merger agreement.
In the course of reaching its recommendation, the CPI board of
directors consulted with CPIs senior management, its
financial advisors and outside legal counsel and considered a
number of substantive factors, both positive and negative, and
potential benefits and detriments of the merger to CPI and its
stockholders. The CPI board of directors believed that, taken as
a whole, the following factors supported its decision to approve
the proposed merger:
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration; Historical Market Prices. The
value of the consideration to be received by CPIs
stockholders pursuant to the merger, including that the implied
merger consideration as of the close of trading on May 7,
2010, of $16.40 per share, represented a significant premium
over the market prices at which CPI common stock had previously
recently traded, including a premium of approximately 26.8% over
the closing price of CPI common stock of $12.93 on May 7,
2010, the last trading day prior to the meeting of the board of
directors at which the merger was approved.
|
|
|
|
Sizeable Portion of Merger Consideration in
Cash. The fact that a sizeable portion of the
merger consideration will be paid in cash, giving CPI
stockholders an opportunity to immediately realize value for a
significant portion of their investment and providing certainty
of value.
|
|
|
|
Participation in Potential Upside. The fact
that, since a portion of the merger consideration will be paid
in Comtech common stock, CPI stockholders would have the
opportunity to participate in any future earnings or growth of
the combined company and future appreciation in the value of
Comtech common stock following the merger should they decide to
retain the Comtech common stock payable in the merger.
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Advisors Opinion. The fact
that the CPI board of directors received an oral opinion, dated
May 7, 2010, subsequently confirmed in writing, from
J.P. Morgan that, as of that date, and based on and subject
to the various factors, assumptions and limitations set forth in
such written opinion, the per share merger consideration to be
received by holders of CPI common stock (other than the Cypress
Group and its affiliates) in the proposed merger was fair, from
a financial point of view, to such holders as more fully
described below under the heading Opinion of
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
Financial Advisors Other Advice. The
fact that J.P. Morgan, a qualified and independent
financial advisor, assisted the board of directors in its
process of exploring strategic alternatives.
|
|
|
|
The Special Committee Recommendation. The fact
that a special committee of the board of directors comprised of
independent directors recommended, among other things, that the
full board approve and adopt the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
The Opinion of the Financial Advisor to the Special
Committee. The fact that the special committee
received an oral opinion, dated May 7, 2010, subsequently
confirmed in writing, that, as of that date and based on and
subject to the various factors, assumptions, limitations and
qualifications set forth in such written opinion, the per share
merger consideration to be received by CPIs stockholders,
pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in
the merger agreement, was fair, from a financial point of view,
to CPIs stockholders (other than the Cypress Group and its
affiliates), as more fully described below under the heading
Opinion of Moelis & Company
LLC.
|
|
|
|
Support of Certain CPI Stockholders. The fact
that stockholders representing a majority of the shares of CPI
common stock outstanding as of the date of the merger agreement
expressed support for the proposed merger, as evidenced by their
willingness to enter into the voting and standstill agreement.
|
|
|
|
Lack of Public Float and Perceived
Overhang. The belief that the upside for
CPIs common stock price as an independent company was
limited due to CPIs relatively small market
capitalization, small public float (due to the majority holdings
of the Cypress Group stockholders), low trading volume when
compared to other companies listed on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market, relative lack of research analyst coverage of CPIs
common stock, and the perception by analysts that substantial
sales of CPI common stock by the Cypress Group stockholders
could depress CPIs stock price. Among other things,
CPIs small market capitalization was due to CPIs
inability to grow significantly through acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
Terms of the Merger Agreement and Voting and Standstill
Agreement. The terms and conditions of the merger
agreement and voting and standstill agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The limited closing conditions to Comtechs obligations
under the merger agreement, including the fact that the merger
agreement is not subject to approval by Comtech stockholders or
the receipt of any financing by Comtech;
|
|
|
|
The provisions of the merger agreement that allow, under certain
circumstances more fully described under The Merger
Agreement Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus, CPI to engage in
negotiations with, and provide information to, third parties in
response to an unsolicited competing acquisition proposal from a
third party that the CPI board of directors determines
constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a
proposal that is superior to the merger;
|
|
|
|
The provisions of the merger agreement that allow, under certain
circumstances more fully described under The Merger
Agreement Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus, the CPI board of
directors to change its recommendation that CPI stockholders
adopt the merger agreement in response to certain competing
acquisition proposals and certain intervening events, if the CPI
board of directors determines in good faith that a failure to
make a change in its recommendation would be reasonably likely
to constitute a violation of its fiduciary duties to
stockholders under Delaware law;
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
The provisions of the voting and standstill agreement that
provide for the termination of the voting and standstill
agreement automatically upon termination of the merger
agreement, including upon termination of the merger agreement by
CPI to enter into a definitive, written agreement concerning a
superior acquisition proposal as described under The
Merger Agreement Termination of the Merger
Agreement beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus and The Voting and
Standstill Agreement beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus);
|
|
|
|
The provisions of the voting and standstill agreement that
reduce the amount of shares the Cypress Group stockholders are
required to vote in favor of the adoption of the merger
agreement to 25% of the outstanding shares of CPI common stock
if the CPI board of directors changes its recommendation with
respect to the merger under certain circumstances (see The
Merger Agreement Termination of the Merger
Agreement beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus and The Voting and
Standstill Agreement beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus). In such circumstances
the Cypress Group stockholders could vote their remaining shares
of stock (representing approximately 25% of the outstanding
shares of CPI common stock) against the adoption of the merger
agreement, which would effectively allow the non-Cypress Group
stockholders to determine whether the merger agreement is
adopted; and
|
|
|
|
The ability of CPI to specifically enforce the terms of the
merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability of Appraisal Rights. The fact
that stockholders who do not vote in favor of the adoption of
the merger agreement and who otherwise properly comply with
Delaware law will have the right to demand appraisal of the fair
value of their shares of CPI common stock under Delaware law,
and that there was no condition in the merger agreement relating
to the maximum number of shares of CPI common stock for which
CPI stockholders could demand appraisal.
|
The CPI board of directors also considered certain potentially
negative factors in its deliberations concerning the merger,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Potential for Decline in Value of Stock Portion of Merger
Consideration. The fact that the value of the
Comtech common stock portion of the merger consideration could
decline prior to consummation of the merger, thereby causing the
value of the merger consideration to decline. The CPI board of
directors determined that this structure was appropriate and the
risk acceptable in view of factors such as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CPI board of directors review of the relative
intrinsic values and financial performance of Comtech and CPI
and the relative performance of each companys
stock; and
|
|
|
|
The fact that a substantial portion of the merger consideration
will be paid in a fixed cash amount which reduces the impact of
any decline in the trading price of Comtech common stock on the
value of the merger consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Non-Completion. The possibility that
the merger might not be completed as a result of, among other
reasons, potential objections of regulatory authorities, and the
transaction costs that will be incurred even if the merger is
not consummated, along with the effect the resulting public
announcement of termination of the merger agreement may have on
the trading price of CPI common stock and CPIs operating
results.
|
|
|
|
Possible Deterrence of Competing Offers. The
risk that various provisions of the merger agreement, including
the requirement that CPI must pay to Comtech a
break-up fee
of up to $12 million, if the merger agreement is terminated
under certain circumstances, may discourage other parties
potentially interested in an acquisition of, or combination
with, CPI from pursuing that opportunity. See The Merger
Agreement Termination of the Merger Agreement
beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
Effect of Voting and Standstill Agreement. The
fact that while the approval of the adoption of the merger
agreement by CPIs stockholders is required under Delaware
law, approximately 49.9% of the shares of CPI common stock
entitled to vote at the special meeting have committed to vote
in favor of such adoption pursuant to the voting and standstill
agreement. As a result, the adoption of the merger agreement at
the special meeting is nearly assured merely by the vote of
those CPI stockholders party to the voting and
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
standstill agreement, absent: (i) the termination of the
voting and standstill agreement as a result of, among other
things, CPI terminating the merger agreement in order to enter
into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior
acquisition proposal or (ii) the CPI board of directors
changing its recommendation under certain circumstances, in
which case the percentage of shares that the Cypress Group
stockholders would be required to be vote in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement would be reduced to 25% of the
total outstanding shares of CPI common stock. See The
Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements No Solicitation of Transactions by
CPI and The Voting and Standstill Agreement
beginning on pages
[l]
and
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible Disruption of the Business and Costs and
Expenses. The possible disruption to CPIs
business that may result from the merger, the resulting
distraction of the attention of CPIs management and
potential attrition of CPIs employees, as well as the
costs and expenses associated with completing the merger.
|
|
|
|
Restrictions on Operation of CPIs
Business. The requirement that CPI conduct its
business only in the ordinary course prior to the completion of
the merger and subject to specified restrictions on the conduct
of CPIs business without Comtechs prior consent,
which might delay or prevent CPI from taking advantage of
certain business opportunities that might arise pending
completion of the merger.
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration Taxable. The fact that
the merger is a taxable transaction to CPI stockholders, and the
receipt of Comtech common stock and cash in exchange for CPI
common stock in the merger will generally be taxable to CPI
stockholders. See The Merger Certain Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
Other Risks. The additional risks described in
the section entitled Risk Factors beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
The CPI board of directors concluded that the potential benefits
that it expected CPI stockholders would receive as a result of
the merger outweighed the potentially negative factors
associated with the proposed merger. Accordingly, the CPI board
of directors unanimously determined that the merger agreement
and the merger are advisable to, and in the best interests of,
CPI and its stockholders.
In addition, the CPI board of directors was aware of and
considered the interests that CPIs directors and executive
officers may have with respect to the merger that differ from,
or are in addition to, their interests as stockholders of CPI
generally, as described in Interests of Certain Persons in
the Merger beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the CPI board of directors is not exhaustive. In
view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection
with its evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these
matters, the CPI board of directors did not consider it
practicable to, and did not attempt to, quantify or otherwise
assign relative or specific weight or values to any of these
factors. Rather, the CPI board of directors viewed its position
and recommendation as being based on an overall analysis and on
the totality of the information presented to and factors
considered by it. In addition, in considering the factors
described above, individual directors may have given different
weights to different factors. After considering this
information, the CPI board of directors unanimously approved and
declared the advisability of the merger agreement and the
merger, and recommended that CPI stockholders adopt the merger
agreement.
This explanation of CPIs reasons for the merger and other
information presented in this section is forward-looking in
nature and, therefore, should be read in light of the
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Comtechs
Reasons for the Merger
Comtechs board of directors has unanimously approved and
adopted the merger agreement. In evaluating the merger,
Comtechs board of directors considered, among other
things, the following key strategic benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger allows Comtech to strategically redeploy a
significant portion of its existing cash to enhance earnings per
share and stockholder value;
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
the merger increases the size of Comtechs RF microwave
amplifier segment and Comtech anticipates that this increased
size will enhance its growth prospects and have a positive
impact on Comtechs earnings before interest, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization;
|
|
|
|
Comtech believes the merger will result in Comtech becoming a
leading global supplier of vacuum electron devices (including
klystrons, traveling wave tubes and power grid devices) as
CPIs vacuum electron devices and amplifiers are
incorporated into products that are used in a broad array of
applications and end-markets;
|
|
|
|
Comtech believes the merger will help to further drive
innovation by combining manufacturing, engineering and sales
teams for Comtechs XICOM branded-product group with
CPIs Satcom product group to take advantage of united
resources which are expected to deliver new and advanced
amplifiers and other products to be used in satellite
communications, radar applications and electronic warfare
systems;
|
|
|
|
the complementary nature of CPIs products, including
CPIs extensive portfolio of over 4,500 microwave and power
grid devices, provides diversity to Comtechs product
portfolio and customer base;
|
|
|
|
a material portion of CPIs sales are derived from sales
for replacements, spares and repairs, including upgraded
replacements for existing sole-sourced products, which have
strong related cash flows that Comtech believes will help
provide more stability and predictability to its business and
will assist in partially insulating Comtech from dramatic shifts
in market conditions; and
|
|
|
|
Comtech expects that the merger will allow it to combine its
product offerings with those of CPI to take advantage of some
customers preference for one-stop shopping.
|
In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection
with its evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these
matters, the Comtech board of directors did not find it useful,
and did not attempt, to quantify, rank or otherwise assign any
relative or specific weights to the factors that it considered
in reaching its determination to approve the merger and the
merger agreement. In addition, individual members of the Comtech
board of directors may have given differing weights to different
factors. The Comtech board of directors conducted an overall
analysis of the factors described above, including through
discussions with, and inquiry of, Comtechs management and
outside legal and financial advisors regarding certain of the
matters described above.
Opinion
of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
CPI retained J.P. Morgan as its financial advisor for the
purpose of advising CPI in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement and to evaluate whether the
consideration in the merger was fair, from a financial point of
view, to the holders of common stock of CPI (other than The
Cypress Group and its affiliates). At the meeting of the board
of directors of CPI on May 7, 2010, J.P. Morgan
rendered its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing to
the board of directors of CPI, that, as of such date and on the
basis of and subject to the various factors, assumptions and
limitations set forth in such written opinion, the per share
merger consideration to be received by holders of CPI common
stock (other than The Cypress Group and its affiliates) in the
proposed merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to
such holders. The J.P. Morgan written opinion, dated
May 7, 2010, is sometimes referred to herein as the
J.P. Morgan opinion.
The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan,
dated May 7, 2010, which sets forth, among other things,
the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered
and any limitations on the review undertaken in rendering its
opinion, is attached as Annex D. The summary of
J.P. Morgans opinion set forth in this document is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
opinion. Stockholders should read this opinion carefully and in
its entirety. J.P. Morgans opinion is directed to the
board of directors of CPI, addresses only the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the consideration to be received by
the holders of common stock of CPI (other than The Cypress Group
and its affiliates) in the proposed merger, and does not address
any other aspect of the merger. The issuance of the
J.P. Morgan opinion was approved by a fairness opinion
committee of J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan provided its
advisory services and opinion for the information and assistance
of the board of directors of CPI in connection with its
consideration of the proposed merger. The opinion of
J.P. Morgan does not constitute a recommendation as to how
any stockholder should vote with respect to the proposed merger.
In addition, the J.P. Morgan opinion does
53
not in any manner address the prices at which CPIs or
Comtechs common stock will trade following the date of the
opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft dated May 5, 2010 of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning CPI and Comtech and the industries in
which they operate;
|
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with the
publicly available financial terms of certain transactions
involving companies J.P. Morgan deemed relevant and the
consideration received for such companies;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial and operating performance of CPI and
Comtech with publicly available information concerning certain
other companies J.P. Morgan deemed relevant, and reviewed
the current and historical market prices of CPIs common
stock and Comtechs common stock and certain publicly
traded securities of such other companies;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by or at the direction of the managements of CPI and
Comtech relating to their respective businesses, as well as the
estimated amount and timing of the cost savings and related
expenses and synergies expected to result from the merger,
referred to in this section as the
Synergies; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and
considered such other information as J.P. Morgan deemed
appropriate for the purposes of its opinion.
|
J.P. Morgan also held discussions with certain members of the
management of CPI and Comtech with respect to certain aspects of
the merger, the past and current business operations of CPI and
Comtech, the financial condition and future prospects and
operations of CPI and Comtech, the effects of the merger on the
financial condition and future prospects of CPI and Comtech, and
certain other matters J.P. Morgan believed necessary or
appropriate to its inquiry.
In giving its opinion, J.P. Morgan relied upon and assumed
the accuracy and completeness of all information that was
publicly available or was furnished to or discussed with
J.P. Morgan by CPI and Comtech or otherwise reviewed by or
for J.P. Morgan, and J.P. Morgan did not independently
verify (nor did it assume responsibility or liability for
independently verifying) any such information or its accuracy or
completeness. J.P. Morgan did not conduct and was not
provided with any valuation or appraisal of any assets or
liabilities, nor did J.P. Morgan evaluate the solvency of
CPI and Comtech under any state or federal laws relating to
bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In relying on
financial analyses and forecasts provided to J.P. Morgan or
derived therefrom, including the Synergies, J.P. Morgan
assumed that they were reasonably prepared based on assumptions
reflecting the best then-available estimates and judgments by
management as to the expected future results of operations and
financial condition of CPI and Comtech to which such analyses or
forecasts relate. J.P. Morgan expressed no view as to such
analyses or forecasts (including the Synergies) or the
assumptions on which they were based. J.P. Morgan also
assumed that the merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement would have the tax consequences
described in discussions with, and materials furnished to
J.P. Morgan by, representatives of CPI, and would be
consummated as described in the merger agreement, and that the
definitive merger agreement would not differ in any material
respects from the draft thereof furnished by CPI and reviewed by
J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan also assumed that the
representations and warranties made by CPI, Comtech and Merger
Sub in the merger agreement and the related agreements were and
would be true and correct in all respects material to its
analysis. J.P. Morgan is not a legal, regulatory or tax
expert and relied on the assessments made by CPIs advisors
with respect to such issues. J.P. Morgan further assumed
that all material governmental, regulatory or other consents,
authorizations and approvals necessary for the consummation of
the merger will be obtained without any adverse effect on CPI
and Comtech or on the contemplated benefits of the merger.
The J.P. Morgan opinion is necessarily based on economic,
market, regulatory and other conditions as in effect on, and the
information made available to J.P. Morgan as of, the date
of the J.P. Morgan opinion. Subsequent developments may
affect the J.P. Morgan opinion, and J.P. Morgan does
not have any obligation to update, revise or
54
reaffirm the J.P. Morgan opinion. The J.P. Morgan
opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the consideration to be received by the holders of
CPIs common stock (other than The Cypress Group and its
affiliates) in the proposed merger, and J.P. Morgan has
expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the merger to any
person or entity, or as to the fairness of any consideration to
be received by the holders of any other class of securities,
creditors or other constituencies of CPI or as to the underlying
decision by CPI to engage in the merger. Furthermore,
J.P. Morgan has expressed no opinion with respect to the
amount or nature of any compensation to any officers, directors,
or employees of any party to the merger, or any class of such
persons relative to the consideration to be received by the
holders of CPIs common stock (other than The Cypress Group
and its affiliates) in the merger or with respect to the
fairness of any such compensation. J.P. Morgan has also
expressed no opinion as to the price at which shares of
CPIs and Comtechs common stock will trade at any
future time.
In accordance with customary investment banking practice,
J.P. Morgan employed generally accepted valuation methods
in reaching its opinion. The following is a summary of the
material financial analyses undertaken by J.P. Morgan in
connection with rendering the J.P. Morgan opinion delivered
to the CPI board of directors on May 7, 2010 and contained
in the presentation delivered to the CPI board of directors on
May 7, 2010 in connection with the rendering of such
opinion. Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include
information presented in tabular format. The tables are not
intended to stand alone, and in order to more fully understand
the financial analyses used by J.P. Morgan, the tables must
be read together with the full text of each summary. Considering
the data set forth below without considering the full narrative
description of the financial analyses, including the
methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of
J.P. Morgans financial analyses. For purposes of the
CPI Financial Analyses summarized below, the
per-share merger consideration refers to the $16.40
implied per share value of the per-share merger consideration
based on the $9.00 per-share cash, without interest, portion of
the per-share merger consideration and the implied per-share
value of the Comtech common stock portion of the per-share
merger consideration of $7.40 on May 7, 2010.
Estimates
In performing its analysis of CPI, J.P. Morgan relied upon
estimates provided by the management of CPI prepared in
connection with the proposed merger for the period from
October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2014, plus an
extrapolation of such estimates for the period from
October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2019 reviewed
and approved by the management of CPI, which are referred to in
this document as the CPI Management Estimates. In
performing its analysis as it applies to Comtech,
J.P. Morgan relied upon estimates provided by the
management of Comtech prepared in connection with the proposed
merger for the period from August 1, 2009 through
July 31, 2015 which were reviewed and approved by the
management of CPI, plus an extrapolation of such estimates for
the period from August 1, 2015 through July 31, 2019,
reviewed and approved by the management of CPI.
The forecasts furnished to J.P. Morgan for CPI and Comtech
were prepared by the management of CPI and Comtech,
respectively, in connection with the proposed merger. Neither
CPI nor Comtech publicly discloses internal management forecasts
of the type provided to J.P. Morgan in connection with
J.P. Morgans analysis of the merger, and such
forecasts were prepared in connection with the proposed merger
and were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure.
These forecasts were based on numerous variables and assumptions
that are inherently uncertain and may be beyond the control of
management, including, without limitation, factors related to
general economic and competitive conditions and prevailing
interest rates. Accordingly, actual results could vary
significantly from those set forth in such forecasts.
CPI
Financial Analyses
Historical Share Price Exchange Ratio Analysis; 52-Week
Trading Range;
3-Month
Volume-Weighted Average Price;
6-Month
Volume-Weighted Average Price; Analyst Targets
J.P. Morgan reviewed the per share daily closing market price of
CPIs common stock and Comtechs common stock over the
three-year period ending on May 7, 2010, calculated the
implied historical exchange ratios during such period by
dividing the daily closing price per share of CPIs common
stock by Comtechs common stock and identified the median
of those implied historical exchange ratios for the one-month,
two-month, three-month, six-
55
month, one-year, two-year and three-year periods ending
May 7, 2010 and the high and low of those implied exchange
ratios for the three-year period ending May 7, 2010. The
price implied by the offer was $16.40 per share of CPIs
common stock (based on market data as of May 7, 2010), and
the exchange ratio implied by such offer price, assuming 100%
Comtech common stock consideration and no cash consideration,
was 0.528x based on the closing share price of Comtechs
common stock of $31.06 on May 7, 2010. The results of the
implied exchange ratio analysis, assuming 100% Comtech common
stock consideration and no cash consideration, (rounded to the
nearest thousandth) are set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis Historical
Period
|
|
Implied Exchange Ratio
|
|
Current
|
|
|
0.420
|
x
|
1-month
median
|
|
|
0.413
|
x
|
2-month
median
|
|
|
0.414
|
x
|
3-month
median
|
|
|
0.411
|
x
|
6-month
median
|
|
|
0.380
|
x
|
1-year median
|
|
|
0.341
|
x
|
2-year median
|
|
|
0.306
|
x
|
3-year median
|
|
|
0.316
|
x
|
High
|
|
|
0.498
|
x
|
Low
|
|
|
0.127
|
x
|
J.P. Morgan reviewed the 52-week trading range of CPIs
stock price. Specifically, the reference range was $7.80 to
$14.55 for the 52-week trading range ending May 7, 2010, as
compared to the per share merger consideration of $16.40 (based
on market data as of May 7, 2010). J.P. Morgan also
reviewed the
3-months and
6-months
volume-weighted average price (referred to in this section as
VWAP) of CPIs stock price. Specifically, the reference
VWAPs were $13.02 for the
3-months
trading range ending May 7, 2010 and $12.41 for the
6-months
trading range ending May 7, 2010. Finally, J.P. Morgan
reviewed Wall Street equity research analyst price targets for
CPIs stock price based on which the reference range was
$15.00 to $16.00.
J.P. Morgan noted that all of the foregoing analyses are not
valuation methodologies and that such analyses were presented
merely for reference purposes.
Selected
Publicly Traded Companies
Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan compared
selected financial performance of CPI with publicly available
information of selected publicly traded companies engaged in
businesses which J.P. Morgan deemed relevant to CPIs
business. The companies were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Applied Signal Technology Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Cubic Corporation;
|
|
|
|
EMS Technologies, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Globecomm Systems Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Harris Corporation;
|
|
|
|
Herley Industries, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
L-3 Communications Corporation;
|
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins, Inc.; and
|
|
|
|
ViaSat, Inc.
|
These companies were selected, among other reasons, because they
share similar business characteristics to CPI based on
operational and financial metrics as well as business sector
participation.
56
In all instances, multiples were based on closing stock prices
on May 7, 2010. For each of the following analyses
performed by J.P. Morgan, financial data for selected
companies were based on the selected companies filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and publicly
available Wall Street research analysts estimates.
For each of the selected companies, J.P. Morgan calculated
(i) the companys firm value divided by its estimated
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as EBITDA), for
calendar years 2010 and 2011, which are referred to as Firm
Value/2010E EBITDA Multiple and Firm Value/2011E EBITDA
Multiple, respectively, and (ii) the per share closing
price of such companys price of common stock divided by
the estimated earnings per share (referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as EPS) for calendar years 2010 and 2011,
which are referred to as Price/2010E Earnings Multiple and
Price/2011E Earnings Multiple, respectively. For the purpose of
this analysis, Firm Value of a particular company was calculated
as market value of such companys outstanding common stock
(as of May 7, 2010) plus the value of such
companys indebtedness and minority interests, in-the-money
options and warrants, net of option proceeds, and preferred
stock, minus such companys cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities.
The analysis indicated the following mean and median Firm Value
and stock price multiples:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Value/
|
|
Firm Value/
|
|
Price per Share/
|
|
Price per Share/
|
|
|
2010E EBITDA
|
|
2011E EBITDA
|
|
2010E EPS
|
|
2011E EPS
|
|
Median
|
|
|
6.7
|
x
|
|
|
7.0
|
x
|
|
|
16.4
|
x
|
|
|
12.3
|
x
|
Mean
|
|
|
7.1
|
x
|
|
|
7.2
|
x
|
|
|
15.4
|
x
|
|
|
13.0
|
x
|
Based on the results of this analysis and on other factors
J.P. Morgan considered appropriate, J.P. Morgan
applied (i) a Firm Value/2010E EBITDA ratio range of 6.0x
to 8.0x and a Firm Value/2011E EBITDA ratio range of 5.5x to
7.5x and (ii) a Price/2010E Earnings Multiple range of
11.0x to 15.0x and a Price/2011E Earnings Multiple range of
10.0x to 14.0x to CPIs management projections of
CPIs 2010 and 2011 EBITDA and EPS, respectively, and
derived the following implied per share equity value ranges for
CPIs common stock, as compared to the value of the per
share merger consideration (rounded to the nearest $0.25):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
Per Share Merger
|
Valuation Basis
|
|
Equity Value Ranges
|
|
Consideration
|
|
Firm Value as multiple of 2010E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
10.25 to $16.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Value as multiple of 2011E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
9.75 to $15.75
|
|
|
$
|
16.40
|
(1)
|
Price per Share as multiple of 2010E EPS
|
|
$
|
12.75 to $17.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share as multiple of 2011E EPS
|
|
$
|
12.50 to $17.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on market data as of May 7, 2010 |
No company used in this analysis is identical or directly
comparable to CPI. Accordingly, an evaluation of the results of
this analysis necessarily involves complex considerations and
judgments concerning differences in financial, operating, and
business sector characteristics, and other factors that could
affect the public trading or other values of the companies to
which CPI is compared.
57
Precedent
Transaction Multiples Analysis
Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan examined
the following selected transactions involving companies or
businesses which J.P. Morgan judged to be analogous or
similar to CPIs business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Announcement
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Date
|
|
Crane Co.
|
|
Merrimac Industries, Inc.
|
|
12/23/09
|
Cobham plc
|
|
M/A-Com. Technology Solutions
|
|
05/13/08
|
Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
|
|
Radyne Corporation
|
|
05/12/08
|
Cobham plc
|
|
Surveillance and Attack Business (BAE Systems)
|
|
12/19/07
|
Veritas Capital
|
|
Aeroflex Inc.
|
|
05/25/07
|
Cobham plc
|
|
Remec Defense & Space Unit
|
|
12/21/04
|
Cypress Group
|
|
Communications & Power Industries, Inc.
|
|
12/01/03
|
Crane Co.
|
|
Signal Technology Corporation
|
|
04/16/03
|
For each of the selected transactions, to the extent information
was publicly available, J.P. Morgan calculated the
targets firm value implied by the transaction divided by
its EBITDA for the last twelve month period, which is referred
to in proxy statement/prospectus as LTM, prior to announcement
of the transaction. The analysis indicated the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction Group
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Firm Value/LTM EBITDA
|
|
|
9.1x
|
|
Based on the results of this analysis and other factors that
J.P. Morgan considered appropriate, J.P. Morgan
applied the range of 7.5x to 9.5x LTM EBITDA multiples to
CPIs LTM EBITDA and derived an implied per share equity
value range for CPIs common stock of $13.00 to $18.25.
No company, business or transaction used in this analysis is
identical or directly comparable to CPI or the merger.
Accordingly, an evaluation of the results of this analysis
necessarily involves complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics and other factors that could affect the
acquisition or other values of the companies, business segments
or transactions to which CPI and the merger were compared.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
J.P. Morgan conducted a discounted cash flow analysis for CPI
for the purpose of determining an implied fully diluted equity
value per share for CPIs common stock on a stand-alone
basis (i.e., without Synergies). A discounted cash flow analysis
is a method of evaluating an asset using estimates of the future
unlevered free cash flows generated by assets and taking into
consideration the time value of money with respect to those
future cash flows by calculating their present
value. Present value refers to the current
value of one or more future unlevered free cash flows from the
asset, which J.P. Morgan refers to as that assets
cash flows, and is obtained by discounting those cash flows back
to the present using a discount rate that takes into account
macro-economic assumptions and estimates of risk, the
opportunity cost of capital, capitalized returns and other
appropriate factors. Terminal value refers to the
capitalized value of all cash flows from an asset for periods
beyond the final forecast period.
J.P. Morgan calculated the value of the standalone, unlevered
free cash flows that CPI is expected to generate from
July 1, 2010 through September 30, 2014 based upon CPI
Management Estimates and the value of the unlevered free cash
flows that CPI is expected to generate from October 1, 2014
through September 30, 2019 based upon extrapolations
reviewed and approved by CPIs management, calculated
assuming that the projected unlevered free cash flows for both
periods occur at the middle of each annual period, and then
discounted such cash flows to present value as of June 30,
2010 using a range of discount rates from 11.0% to 12.0%. This
range of discount rates was chosen by J.P. Morgan based
upon an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital of CPI
which included, among other considerations, an analysis of the
cost of equity and cost of debt of CPI using publicly available
information and J.P. Morgans judgment.
J.P. Morgan also calculated a range of Terminal Values for
CPI,
58
as of September 30, 2019, by applying a perpetual revenue
growth rate ranging from 2.0% to 3.0%, which were discounted to
present value as of June 30, 2010 using a range of discount
rates from 11.0% to 12.0%.
The implied per share equity value range of CPIs common
stock that J.P. Morgan derived from such analyses, as
compared to the implied price per share in the proposed merger
is set forth below (rounded to the nearest $0.25):
|
|
|
Implied Per Share Equity Value Range
|
|
Per Share Merger Consideration
|
|
$15.00 to $19.00
|
|
$16.40 (1)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on market data as of May 7, 2010 |
Comtech
Financial Analyses
52-Week
Trading Range;
3-Month
Volume-Weighted Average Price;
6-Month
Volume-Weighted Average Price; Analyst Targets
J.P. Morgan reviewed the 52-week trading range of Comtechs
stock price. Specifically, the reference range was $26.65 to
$38.17 for the 52-week trading range ending May 7, 2010, as
compared to the price per share of $31.06 as of May 7,
2010. J.P. Morgan also reviewed the
3-months and
6-months
VWAP of Comtechs stock price. Specifically, the reference
VWAPs were $31.54 for the
3-months
trading range ending May 7, 2010 and $32.73 for the
6-months
trading range ending May 7, 2010. Finally, J.P. Morgan
reviewed Wall Street equity research analyst price targets for
Comtechs stock price based on which the reference range
was $38.00 to $48.00.
J.P. Morgan noted that all of the foregoing analyses are not
valuation methodologies and that such analyses were presented
merely for reference purposes.
Selected
Publicly Traded Companies
J.P. Morgan compared the financial performance of Comtech with
publicly available information on the same set of selected
publicly traded companies J.P. Morgan considered in the
context of the Selected Publicly Traded Companies analysis
relating to CPI which is described above.
J.P. Morgans determination of the appropriateness of
this set of publicly traded companies in the context of
comparison with Comtech was based on the same reasoning as was
applied in the determination of its use in the context of
comparison with CPI.
Based on the results of its analysis and on other factors
J.P. Morgan considered appropriate, J.P. Morgan
applied (i) a Firm Value/2010E EBITDA ratio range of 6.5x
to 8.5x and a Firm Value/2011E EBITDA ratio range of 6.0x to
8.0x and (ii) a Price/2010E Earnings Multiple range of
15.0x to 20.0x and a Price/2011E Earnings Multiple range of
13.0x to 18.0x to Comtechs management projections of
Comtechs 2010 and 2011 EBITDA and EPS, respectively, which
were reviewed and approved by the management of CPI, and derived
the following implied per share equity value range for
Comtechs common stock, as compared to the value of
Comtechs common stock on May 7, 2010 (rounded to the
nearest $0.25):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comtech per Share
|
|
|
Implied per Share
|
|
Price on May 7,
|
Valuation Basis
|
|
Equity Value Range
|
|
2010
|
|
Firm Value as multiple of 2010E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
39.50 to $46.50
|
|
|
$
|
31.06
|
|
Firm Value as multiple of 2011E EBITDA
|
|
$
|
40.50 to $48.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share as multiple of 2010E EPS
|
|
$
|
30.75 to $41.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Share as multiple of 2011E EPS
|
|
$
|
30.50 to $42.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
No company used in this analysis is identical or directly
comparable to Comtech. Accordingly, an evaluation of the results
of this analysis necessarily involves complex considerations and
judgments concerning differences in financial, operating, and
business sector characteristics, and other factors that could
affect the public trading or other values of the companies to
which Comtech is compared.
59
Discounted
Cash Flow
J.P. Morgan calculated the value of the standalone, unlevered
free cash flows that Comtech is expected to generate from
July 1, 2010 through July 31, 2015 based on the
estimates provided by Comtechs management, which were
reviewed and approved by the management of CPI, and the value of
the unlevered free cash flows that Comtech is expected to
generate for August 1, 2015 through July 31, 2019
based upon extrapolations, which were reviewed and approved by
the management of CPI, calculated assuming that the projected
unlevered free cash flows for both periods occur at the middle
of each annual period, and then discounted such cash flows to
present value as of June 30, 2010 using a range of discount
rates from 10.5% to 11.5%. This range of discount rates was
chosen by J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of the
weighted average cost of capital of Comtech, which included,
among other considerations, an analysis of the cost of equity
and cost of debt of Comtech using publicly available information
and J.P. Morgans judgment. J.P. Morgan also
calculated a range of Terminal Values for Comtech, as of
July 31, 2019, by applying a perpetual revenue growth rate
ranging from 2.0% to 3.0%, which were discounted to present
value as of June 30, 2010 using a range of discount rates
from 11.0% to 12.0%.
The implied per share equity value range of Comtechs
common stock that J.P. Morgan derived from such analyses,
as compared to the per share price of Comtechs common
stock on May 7, 2010 is set forth below (rounded to the
nearest $0.25):
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity Value Range
|
|
Comtech per Share Price on May 7, 2010
|
|
$44.25 to $50.00
|
|
$31.06
|
Value
Creation Analysis
Based on discounted cash flow equity
value: J.P. Morgan conducted a value creation
analysis that compared the implied fully diluted equity value of
CPIs common stock derived from the midpoint of the
discounted cash flow analysis on a stand-alone basis using the
CPI Management Estimates to the implied fully diluted equity
value of CPIs common stock pro forma for the merger
together with the cash portion of the transaction consideration
pursuant to the merger agreement. The pro forma implied fully
diluted equity value was based on CPIs pro forma ownership
(based on a 14%/86% CPI/Comtech ownership split, calculated
assuming Comtechs fully diluted shares and net debt (based
on Comtechs share price of $31.06 as of May 7,
2010) and including the shares to be issued to CPI pursuant
to the merger agreement) of: (1) (a) the midpoint of
Comtechs stand-alone discounted cash flow implied equity
value based on the forecast provided by the management of
Comtech, which was reviewed and approved by the management of
CPI, plus (b) the midpoint of CPIs stand-alone
discounted cash flow implied equity value based on the CPI
Management Estimates, plus (c) the present value of the
Synergies (calculated assuming $10 million of annual
synergies with a 36% tax rate discounted at 11.0% and growing at
2.5% per year in perpetuity), less (d) cash consideration
received by CPI stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement,
less (e) estimated transaction expenses, divided by
(2) Comtechs fully diluted shares outstanding (based
on Comtechs share price of $31.06 as of May 7,
2010) pro forma to include the additional shares to be
issued as consideration pursuant to the merger agreement.
Based on current publicly traded equity
values: J.P. Morgan conducted a value creation
analysis that compared the publicly traded fully diluted equity
value of CPIs common stock to the implied fully diluted
equity value of CPIs common stock pro forma for the merger
together with the cash portion of the transaction consideration
pursuant to the merger agreement. The pro forma implied fully
diluted equity value was based on CPIs pro forma ownership
(based on a 14%/86% CPI/ Comtech ownership split, calculated
assuming Comtechs fully diluted shares and net debt (based
on Comtechs share price of $31.06 as of May 7,
2010) and including the shares to be issued to CPI pursuant
to the merger agreement) of: (1) (a) Comtechs
publicly traded fully diluted equity value as of May 7,
2010 plus (b) CPIs publicly traded fully diluted
equity value as of May 7, 2010, plus (c) the present
value of the Synergies (calculated assuming $10 million of
annual synergies with a 36% tax rate discounted at 11.0% and
growing at 2.5% per year in perpetuity), less (d) cash
consideration received by CPI stockholders pursuant to the
merger agreement, less (e) estimated transaction expenses,
divided by (2) Comtechs fully diluted shares
outstanding (based on Comtechs share price of $31.06 as of
May 7, 2010 ) pro forma to include the additional shares to
be issued as consideration pursuant to the merger agreement.
60
The value creation analyses yielded the following pro forma
implied accretion to CPIs fully diluted equity value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied CPI Equity
|
Valuation Metric
|
|
Value Accretion
|
|
Midpoint of discounted cash flow Equity Value
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
Publicly Traded Equity Value
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
The foregoing summary of the material financial analyses does
not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data
presented or considered by J.P. Morgan. The preparation of
a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily
susceptible to partial analysis or summary description.
J.P. Morgan believes that the foregoing summary and its
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of the foregoing summary and these analyses, without
considering all of its analyses as a whole, could create an
incomplete view of the processes underlying the analyses and its
opinion. As a result, the ranges of valuations resulting from
any particular analysis or combination of analyses described
above were merely utilized to create points of reference for
analytical purposes and should not be taken to be the view of
J.P. Morgan with respect to the actual value of CPI. In
arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan reviewed various
financial and operational metrics for both CPI and Comtech,
including forecasts with respect to CPI and Comtech, which were
made available to J.P. Morgan by or on behalf of CPI and
Comtech. In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan did not
attribute any particular weight to any analyses or factors
considered by it and did not form an opinion as to whether any
individual analysis or factor (positive or negative), considered
in isolation, supported or failed to support its opinion.
Rather, J.P. Morgan considered the totality of the factors
and analyses performed in determining its opinion. Analyses
based upon forecasts of future results are inherently uncertain,
as they are subject to numerous factors or events beyond the
control of the parties and their advisors. Accordingly,
forecasts and analyses used or made by J.P. Morgan are not
necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than suggested by those
analyses. Moreover, J.P. Morgans analyses are not and
do not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the
prices at which businesses actually could be bought or sold. The
consideration and other terms of the merger were determined
through arms-length negotiations between CPI and Comtech.
As a part of its investment banking business, J.P. Morgan
and its affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. J.P. Morgan was
selected on the basis of such experience and its familiarity
with CPI, Comtech and other companies in the industries in which
they operate to advise CPI in connection with a potential
transaction such as the merger and to potentially deliver a
fairness opinion to the board of directors of CPI addressing the
fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration in
such a transaction to the holders of common stock of CPI (other
than The Cypress Group and its affiliates) as of the date of
such opinion.
For services rendered in connection with the merger (including
the delivery of its opinion), CPI has agreed to pay
J.P. Morgan a fee estimated to be approximately
$5.0 million, a substantial portion of which will become
payable only if the proposed merger is consummated. Finally, CPI
has agreed to reimburse J.P. Morgan for certain expenses
incurred in connection with its services, including the fees and
disbursements of counsel, and will indemnify J.P. Morgan
against certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under
the federal securities laws.
During the two years preceding the date of the J.P. Morgan
opinion, neither J.P. Morgan nor any of its affiliates has
had any other significant financial advisory or other
significant commercial or investment banking relationships with
CPI. J.P. Morgan and its affiliates have performed in the
past, and continue to perform, certain commercial or investment
banking services for Comtech and its affiliates, all for
customary compensation or other financial benefits including,
during the last two years, acting as a bookrunner in May 2009
for Comtechs $200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of
3.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2029. In the ordinary
course of its businesses, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates
may actively trade the debt and equity securities of CPI and
Comtech for their own accounts or for the accounts of customers
and, accordingly, they may at any time hold long or short
positions in such securities.
61
Opinion
of Moelis & Company LLC
Pursuant to a letter agreement dated April 7, 2010, CPI
engaged Moelis to act as financial advisor to the special
committee of CPIs board of directors in connection with
the merger or combination of CPI with a third party, or a third
partys acquisition of all or substantially all of
CPIs assets, properties or business. Subsequently, the
special committee asked Moelis to provide it with an opinion as
to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to CPIs
stockholders (other than The Cypress Group and its affiliates,
Comtech, Merger Sub or any other wholly owned subsidiary of
Comtech to the extent any such entities own shares of CPI common
stock, collectively referred to herein as the excluded holders)
of the per share merger consideration to be received by such
stockholders pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the merger agreement.
On May 7, 2010, at a meeting of the special committee held
to evaluate the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, Moelis delivered to the special committee
its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed by delivery of a
written opinion dated May 7, 2010, that, based upon and
subject to the various factors, assumptions, limitations and
qualifications set forth in the opinion, as of the date of the
opinion, the per share merger consideration to be received by
CPIs stockholders, pursuant to the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, is fair, from
a financial point of view, to CPIs stockholders, other
than the excluded holders.
The full text of Moelis opinion is attached as
Annex E to this proxy statement/prospectus and is
incorporated herein by reference. This summary is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. The
full text of the opinion describes the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken by Moelis in connection with such opinion.
Stockholders are encouraged to read the opinion carefully in
its entirety. Moelis opinion is directed to the
special committee of CPIs board of directors and addresses
only the fairness from a financial point of view of the merger
consideration to be received by CPI stockholders (other than the
excluded holders). The special committee has not asked Moelis to
address, and its opinion does not address, the fairness to, or
any other consideration of, the holders of any class of
securities, creditors or other constituencies of CPI, other than
the holders of CPI common stock.
Moelis opinion does not address CPIs underlying
business decision to effect the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement or the relative merits of the merger as
compared to any alternative business strategies or transactions
that might be available to CPI, and it does not constitute a
recommendation to any CPI stockholder as to how such stockholder
should vote with respect to the merger or any other matter.
At the direction of the special committee, Moelis was not
asked to, nor did it, offer any opinion as to the material terms
of the merger agreement or the form of the merger. Moelis
expressed no opinion as to what the value of Comtechs
common stock will be when it is issued pursuant to the merger
agreement or the prices at which Comtechs common stock
will trade in the future.
In addition, Moelis did not express any opinion as to the
fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to be
received by any of CPIs officers, directors or employees,
or any class of such persons, relative to the merger
consideration.
Moelis opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary,
market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information
made available to Moelis as of, the date of Moelis
opinion. Moelis has also assumed, with the consent of the
special committee, that all governmental, regulatory or other
consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the
merger will be obtained without the imposition of any material
delay, limitation, restriction, divestiture or condition that
would have an adverse effect on CPI or Comtech or on the
expected benefits of the merger.
Moelis has also assumed, with the consent of the special
committee, that the final executed form of the merger agreement
does not differ in any material respect from the draft that
Moelis examined, and that Comtech and CPI will comply with all
the material terms of the merger agreement without amendment
thereto and all conditions to the consummation of the merger
will be satisfied without waiver by any party of the conditions
or obligations thereto. Moelis has not been authorized to
solicit, and has not solicited, indications of interest in a
possible transaction with CPI from any party. The opinion was
approved by a Moelis fairness opinion committee.
62
In arriving at the conclusions reached in its opinion, Moelis
has, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to CPI and Comtech that Moelis deemed
relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal information relating to the business,
including financial forecasts, earnings, cash flow, assets,
liabilities and prospects of CPI, furnished to Moelis by CPI;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal information relating to the business,
including financial forecasts, earnings, cash flow, assets,
liabilities and prospects of Comtech, furnished to Moelis by
Comtech;
|
|
|
|
conducted discussions with members of senior management and
representatives of CPI and Comtech concerning the matters
described in the foregoing bullets, as well as their respective
businesses and prospects before and after giving effect to the
merger;
|
|
|
|
reviewed publicly available financial and stock market data,
including valuation multiples, for CPI and Comtech and compared
them with those of certain other companies in lines of business
that Moelis deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with the
financial terms of certain other transactions that Moelis deemed
relevant;
|
|
|
|
considered certain potential pro forma effects of the merger;
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft of the merger agreement, dated May 6, 2010
and a draft of the voting and standstill agreement, dated
May 6, 2010;
|
|
|
|
participated in certain discussions and negotiations among
representatives of CPI and Comtech and their financial and legal
advisors; and
|
|
|
|
conducted such other financial studies and analyses and took
into account such other information as Moelis deemed appropriate.
|
In connection with its review, Moelis did not assume any
responsibility for independent verification of any of the
information supplied to, discussed with, or reviewed by it for
the purpose of its opinion and, with the consent of the special
committee, relied on such information being complete and
accurate in all material respects. In addition, at the direction
of the special committee, Moelis has not made any independent
evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities
(contingent, derivative, off-balance-sheet or otherwise) of CPI
or Comtech, nor has Moelis been furnished with any such
evaluation or appraisal. With respect to the forecasted
financial information referred to above, Moelis assumed, with
the consent of the special committee, that such information was
reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the management of CPI or
Comtech as to the future performance of their respective
companies and that such future financial results will be
achieved at the times and in the amounts projected by
management. Moelis was not requested to, and did not, express
any opinion regarding any legal, tax, accounting or financial
reporting matters, including the tax effect of the merger on CPI
or its stockholders.
Financial
Analyses
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
presented by Moelis to the special committee at its meeting held
on May 7, 2010 in connection with the delivery of the oral
opinion of Moelis at such meeting and its subsequent written
opinion, dated May 7, 2010.
The summary set forth below does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses performed and factors considered by
Moelis in arriving at its opinion. The preparation of a fairness
opinion is a complex process involving various determinations
and subjective judgments as to the most appropriate and relevant
methods of financial analysis and the application of those
methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, such a
process is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or
summary description. With respect to the comparable public
companies analysis and the precedent transactions analysis
summarized below, no company, business or transaction used in
such analyses as a comparison is either identical or directly
comparable to CPI or the merger, nor is an evaluation of
63
such analyses entirely mathematical. These analyses necessarily
involve complex considerations and judgments concerning
financial and operating characteristics and other factors.
Moelis did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with
regard to any one factor or method of analysis for purposes of
its opinion, nor did Moelis attribute any particular weight to
any analysis or factor, but rather arrived at its ultimate
opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it
and assessed as a whole, and believes that the totality of the
factors considered and analyses it performed in connection with
its opinion operated collectively to support its determination
as to the fairness from a financial point of view as of the date
of its opinion of the merger consideration to be received by the
CPI stockholders, other than the excluded holders.
Some of the summaries of the financial analyses below include
information presented in tabular format. In order to fully
understand Moelis analyses, the tables must be read
together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not
constitute a complete description of the analyses performed by
Moelis. Considering the data described below without considering
the full narrative description of the financial analyses,
including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the
analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of
Moelis analyses.
The analyses performed by Moelis include analyses based upon
forecasts of future results, which results might be
significantly more or less favorable than those upon which
Moelis analyses were based. The analyses do not purport to
be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which CPIs or
Comtechs shares of common stock might trade at any time
following the announcement of the merger. Because the analyses
are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous
factors and events, including, without limitation, factors
relating to general economic and competitive conditions beyond
the control of the parties or their respective advisors, neither
Moelis nor any other person assumes responsibility if future
results or actual values are materially different from those
contemplated below.
CPI
Financial Analyses
In its evaluation of the proposed transaction, Moelis selected
three principal valuation methodologies (specifically, a
comparable public companies analysis, a precedent transactions
analysis, and a discounted cash flow analysis), each of which is
summarized on the following pages. Set forth in the table
immediately below are the derived per share valuation ranges
resulting from the application, subject to certain assumptions,
of the three valuation methodologies that Moelis selected. The
implied per share value of the merger consideration is $16.40
per CPI share based on Comtechs closing stock price as of
May 7, 2010 of $31.06 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Methodology
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Comparable public companies analysis
|
|
$
|
11.96 - $15.75
|
|
Precedent transactions analysis
|
|
$
|
11.21 - $16.73
|
|
Discounted cash flow analysis
|
|
$
|
10.82 - $17.61
|
|
Comparable
Public Companies Analysis
Moelis compared certain financial information of the company
with corresponding financial information of similar public
companies.
Moelis selected publicly traded companies that shared similar
characteristics with CPIs business, operations and size,
and for which relevant financial information was publicly
available. The list of selected companies is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Anaren, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Comtech Telecommunications Corp.;
|
|
|
|
e2v Technologies plc;
|
|
|
|
EMS Technologies, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Globecomm Systems Inc.;
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
Herley Industries, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Spectrum Control, Inc.; and
|
|
|
|
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated.
|
As part of its comparable public companies analysis, Moelis
calculated and analyzed each selected companys ratio of
its enterprise value (calculated as fully diluted equity value
based on closing stock prices as of May 7, 2010, including
in-the-money
stock options and
in-the-money
convertible preferred stock or debt, plus debt, minority
interest, preferred stock and
out-of-the
money convertibles, less cash as of each companys most
recently reported quarter end) to EBITDA for the most recent
reported LTM and calendar years 2010 and 2011, each of which is
referred to in this section as CY 2010 and 2011 based on
consensus analyst estimates compiled by Thomson Reuters. In
addition, Moelis calculated and analyzed each selected
companys ratio of its equity value to its earnings for CY
2010 and 2011, also based on such analyst estimates. The
following summarizes the results of these calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/ EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM
|
|
|
7.7x
|
|
|
|
6.8x
|
|
CY2010E
|
|
|
6.0x
|
|
|
|
6.1x
|
|
CY2011E
|
|
|
5.4x
|
|
|
|
5.0x
|
|
Equity Value/ Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CY2010E
|
|
|
14.2x
|
|
|
|
13.9x
|
|
CY2011E
|
|
|
11.8x
|
|
|
|
12.7x
|
|
Moelis selected multiple ranges for each metric based on the
foregoing and in consideration of CPIs business,
operations and size relative to its peers. Moelis used selected
ranges of 7.0x 8.0x, 6.5x 7.5x and
6.0x 7.0x for enterprise value as a multiple of LTM
EBITDA, CY2010E EBITDA and CY2011E EBITDA, respectively. Moelis
used selected ranges of 12.5x 14.5x and
11.0x 13.0x for Equity Value as a multiple CY2010E
Earnings and CY2011E Earnings, respectively. Moelis applied the
selected ranges to the relevant statistics for CPI using
projections for CY2010 and CY2011 prepared by CPI management and
calculated an implied range of CPI common stock prices. This
resulted in a valuation range for CPI of $11.96 to $15.75 per
share. Moelis noted that the merger consideration of $16.40 per
CPI share based on Comtechs closing stock price as of
May 7, 2010 of $31.06 per share exceeded such valuation
range.
Precedent
Transactions Analysis
Moelis compared selected financial and transaction metrics of
CPI and the merger with similar data of relevant transactions in
the defense technologies sectors. The most comparable of these
transactions as determined by business profile and market
environment were Crane Co.s acquisition of Merrimac
Industries, Inc., Cobham plcs acquisition of M/A-Com (a
subsidiary of Tyco), and Cypress Holdings acquisition of
Communications and Power Industries.
For each of the precedent transactions, Moelis calculated
valuation multiples based on information that was publicly
available, focusing on the ratios of enterprise value to EBITDA
and enterprise value to revenue for the identified target
company for the last reported LTM period as of the announcement
date of the transaction.
65
|
|
|
|
|
Date Announced
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
03/30/10
|
|
Microsemi Corporation
|
|
White Electronics Designs Corporation
|
12/23/09
|
|
Crane Co.
|
|
Merrimac Industries, Inc.*
|
04/01/09
|
|
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
|
|
DataPath, Inc.
|
05/13/08
|
|
Cobham plc
|
|
M/A-Com Technology Solutions (Subsidiary of Tyco)*
|
05/10/08
|
|
Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
|
|
Radyne Corporation
|
06/15/07
|
|
AVX Corp.
|
|
American Technological Ceramics Corp.
|
05/22/07
|
|
Veritas Capital
|
|
Aeroflex Inc.
|
03/03/05
|
|
Radyne Corporation
|
|
Xicom Technology, Inc.
|
12/20/04
|
|
Cobham plc
|
|
REMEC Defense & Space
|
07/08/04
|
|
Teledyne
|
|
Celeritek Defense Electronic Business
|
04/24/04
|
|
Smiths Group
|
|
TRAK Communications Inc.
|
11/17/03
|
|
Cypress Holdings
|
|
Communications and Power Industries, Inc.* (Predecessor to CPI)
|
04/16/03
|
|
Crane Co.
|
|
Signal Technology Corporation
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Most relevant precedent transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
All Precedent Transactions:
|
|
Enterprise Value/LTM EBITDA
|
|
Mean**
|
|
|
10.0x
|
|
Median**
|
|
|
10.1x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Relevant Precedent
Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
6.8x
|
|
Median
|
|
|
6.8x
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Excludes Radyne acquisition of Xicom, which was deemed to be an
outlier due to the fact that Xicom did not have material EBITDA. |
Based on the foregoing precedent transactions analysis, Moelis
selected a range of 6.5x 8.5x for enterprise value as a
multiple of LTM EBITDA and derived a valuation range for CPI of
$11.21 to $16.73 per share. Moelis noted that the merger
consideration of $16.40 per CPI share based on Comtechs
closing stock price as of May 7, 2010 of $31.06 per share
was within such valuation range.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Moelis conducted a discounted cash flow, or DCF, analysis of CPI
to calculate a range of implied equity values for CPI. A DCF
analysis is a method of evaluating an asset using estimates of
the future unlevered free cash flows generated by assets and
taking into consideration the time value of money with respect
to those future cash flows by calculating their present
value. Present value refers to the current
value of one or more future cash payments for the asset, which
Moelis refers to as that assets free cash flows, and is
obtained by discounting those free cash flows back to the
present using a discount rate that takes into account
macro-economic assumptions and estimates of risk, the
opportunity costs of capital, capitalized returns and other
appropriate factors. Terminal value refers to the
capitalized value of all free cash flows from an asset for
periods beyond the final forecast period.
Using projections provided by CPI management, Moelis performed a
DCF analysis utilizing the after-tax unlevered free cash flows
for the fiscal years 2011 to 2014, applying the year-end
convention and discount rates ranging from 12.5% to 15.0% based
on relevant metrics for the selected companies referred to above
under Comparable Public Companies
Analysis. Moelis computed a terminal value based on the
perpetuity growth methodology, and selected a perpetuity growth
range of 3.00% to 4.00%.
66
Based on the foregoing, Moelis derived a valuation range of
$10.82 to $17.61 per share. Moelis noted that the merger
consideration of $16.40 per CPI share based on Comtechs
closing stock price as of May 7, 2010 of $31.06 per share
was within such valuation range.
Comtech
Financial Analyses
Comparable
Public Companies Analysis
To assess the fairness of the public stock portion of the merger
consideration offered in connection with the proposed
transaction, Moelis derived a valuation range for Comtech using
a comparable public company analysis.
Moelis selected publicly traded companies that shared similar
characteristics with Comtechs business, operations and
size, and for which relevant financial information was publicly
available. The list of selected companies is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
ADC Telecommunications, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Cobham plc;
|
|
|
|
EMS Technologies, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Elbit Systems Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
Harris Corp.;
|
|
|
|
L-3 Communications; and
|
|
|
|
ViaSat, Inc.
|
As part of its comparable public companies analysis, Moelis
calculated and analyzed each selected companys ratio of
its enterprise value to EBITDA for the LTM and CY 2010 and 2011
based on consensus analyst estimates compiled by Thomson
Reuters. In addition, Moelis calculated and analyzed each
selected companys ratio of its equity value to its
earnings for CY 2010 and 2011, also based on such analyst
estimates. The following summarizes the results of these
calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/ EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM(1)
|
|
|
7.0x
|
|
|
|
7.3x
|
|
CY2010E
|
|
|
7.0x
|
|
|
|
6.7x
|
|
CY2011E
|
|
|
6.4x
|
|
|
|
6.4x
|
|
Equity Value/Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CY2010E
|
|
|
13.5x
|
|
|
|
12.2x
|
|
CY2011E
|
|
|
12.3x
|
|
|
|
10.8x
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
LTM EBITDA multiple median and mean excludes ViaSat, Inc. which
was deemed to be an outlier |
Moelis selected multiple ranges for each metric based on the
foregoing and in consideration of Comtechs business,
operations and size relative to its peers. Moelis used selected
ranges of 7.5x - 8.5x, 6.5x - 7.5x and 5.5x -
7.0x for enterprise value as a multiple of LTM EBITDA, CY2010E
EBITDA and CY2011E EBITDA, respectively. Moelis used selected
ranges of 15.0x - 17.0x and 13.0x - 15.0x for Equity
Value as a multiple CY2010E Earnings and CY2011E Earnings,
respectively. Moelis applied the selected ranges to the relevant
statistics for Comtech using projections for CY2010 and CY2011
prepared by Comtech management and calculated an implied range
of Comtech common stock prices. This resulted in a valuation
range for Comtech of $35.00 to $51.16 per share. In connection
with its analysis, Moelis noted that the closing price of
Comtechs stock on May 7, 2010 was $31.06 per share.
67
Combination
Analysis
Moelis analyzed the pro forma impact of the merger on
Comtechs earnings per share utilizing projections and
financial information provided by management of each of CPI and
Comtech. This analysis is important given the form of
consideration being offered by Comtech to CPI stockholders.
Moelis assumed, among other things, that (i) CPIs
existing debt would be refinanced and (ii) the
consideration to be received by holders of shares of CPI common
stock pursuant to the merger was $9.00 per share in cash and an
estimated $7.40 per share in Comtech common stock, based on an
conversion ratio of 0.2382 shares of Comtech common stock
per share of CPI common stock and the May 7, 2010 closing
price of Comtech common stock of $31.06 per share. See The
Merger Agreement Merger Consideration; Conversion or
Cancellation of Shares in the Merger Merger
Consideration for a description of the conversion ratio
contemplated by the merger agreement.
Based on this analysis, Moelis observed that the merger would
result in earnings per share accretion for Comtech stockholders
in 2010. For 2011, Moelis observed that the merger would result
in earnings per share accretion as well. In each case, the
analysis excluded one-time charges associated with the
transaction. This accretion, which was determined on a
pre-synergy basis, implies that Comtech would realize an
increase in earnings that could result in an increase in the
price of Comtechs stock and indicates that CPI
stockholders who will become stockholders of Comtech may also
realize the benefits of the transaction after the consummation
of the merger.
Other
Information
The consideration to be paid pursuant to the merger agreement
was determined through arms-length negotiations between
CPI and Comtech and was approved by each companys board of
directors. Moelis provided advice to the special committee of
the CPI board of directors during these negotiations, however,
Moelis did not recommend any specific consideration to the
special committee or suggest that any specific consideration
constituted the only appropriate consideration for a transaction.
The merger consideration was determined through negotiations
among CPI and its representatives, on the one hand, and Comtech
and its representatives, on the other hand, and the decision by
the CPI board of directors and the special committee to approve,
adopt and authorize the merger agreement was solely that of each
of the CPI board of directors and the special committee. The
Moelis opinion and financial analyses, taken together,
represented only one of many factors considered by each of the
CPI board of directors and the special committee in its
evaluation of the merger and was not determinative of the views
of the CPI board of directors, the special committee or CPI
management with respect to the merger, the merger consideration
or whether the CPI board of directors or special committee would
have been willing to agree to different merger consideration.
Pursuant to the terms of Moelis engagement as financial
advisor to the special committee, CPI agreed to pay Moelis a
retainer fee of up to $250,000, which would be offset on a
one-time basis against the opinion fee of $800,000, which became
payable upon the delivery of the Moelis opinion described above,
regardless of the conclusion reached in such opinion. In the
event Moelis renders more than one opinion, CPI has agreed to
pay an opinion fee of $400,000 for each such subsequent opinion
promptly upon Moelis having completed the customary work that is
appropriate to render each such opinion, regardless of the
conclusion reached in such opinion, and any such subsequent
opinion fee would be credited against the subsequent transaction
fee referenced below. In addition, CPI has agreed to pay Moelis
a nonrefundable post-signing retainer fee of $150,000, payable
promptly upon CPIs decision to solicit alternative
proposals to the merger agreement during the term of its
engagement with Moelis. Any payment made in connection with such
post-signing retainer fee would be credited against the
subsequent transaction fee described below.
If during the term of CPIs engagement with Moelis, CPI
enters into an agreement, other than the merger agreement with
Comtech, (i) to merge or otherwise combine CPI with a third
party or (ii) that provides for the acquisition by a third
party of all or substantially all of the assets, properties or
business of CPI, CPI has agreed to pay Moelis a subsequent
transaction fee payable at the closing of such transaction equal
to 2.0% of the excess (if any) of the transaction value of such
closed transaction over the transaction value determined with
respect to the merger agreement.
68
In addition, CPI has agreed to indemnify Moelis for certain
liabilities arising out of and reimburse Moelis for certain
expenses in connection with its engagement.
The special committee retained Moelis based upon Moelis
experience and knowledge. Moelis is an investment banking
enterprise with substantial experience in transactions similar
to the merger. Moelis, as part of its investment banking
business, is continually engaged in the valuation of businesses
and securities in connection with business combinations and
acquisitions and for other purposes.
Certain
Illustrative Financial Projections Provided by Comtech
During the course of the negotiations between Comtech and CPI,
Comtech supplied CPI, its financial advisors and the Cypress
Group stockholders with certain business and financial
information that was not publicly available, including certain
illustrative financial projections on a standalone basis.
The illustrative financial projections presented below have been
prepared by, and are the responsibility of, the management of
Comtech. The illustrative financial projections were not
prepared in connection with a detailed analysis of the
fundamentals of Comtechs business and assets nor were they
prepared on a basis consistent with the historical accounting
policies included in the section titled Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operations contained in Comtechs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended July 31, 2009, which is incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. For more
information, see the section titled Where you Can Find
More Information beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
The summary of the illustrative financial projections is
included in this proxy statement/prospectus only because this
information was exchanged between Comtech and CPI, their
financial advisors and the Cypress Group stockholders in
connection with the proposed merger. The inclusion of the
summary of illustrative financial projections should not be
regarded as an indication that either Comtech or CPI considered
the illustrative financial projections to be material, and the
summary is not being included in this proxy statement/prospectus
for the purpose of influencing your decision whether to vote for
the adoption of the merger agreement. Such illustrative
financial projections were neither prepared with a view to
public disclosure, nor were such illustrative financial
projections prepared in compliance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles or with published guidelines of
the SEC or the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants regarding financial projections. Comtechs
independent public registered accounting firm has not examined
or compiled any of the illustrative financial projections,
expressed any conclusion or provided any form of assurance with
respect to the illustrative financial projections and,
accordingly, assumes no responsibility for them.
Comtech cautions you that the illustrative financial projections
are speculative in nature and based upon subjective decisions
and assumptions. The illustrative financial projections were
prepared as of March 12, 2010 and do not reflect actual
results through Comtechs most recent quarter ended
April 30, 2010, nor were they updated to reflect
Comtechs publicly issued guidance on June 3, 2010.
The illustrative financial projections were not prepared with a
view toward public disclosure and are inherently subject to
uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors and events beyond
the control of the parties and their respective advisors, and
the inclusion of this information should not be regarded as
an indication that any of Comtech, CPI or any recipient of this
information considered, or now considers, it to be necessarily
predictive of actual future results.
While presented with numerical specificity, the illustrative
financial projections are necessarily speculative given the time
periods involved and are intended to show the impact of a given
revenue and EBITDA growth rate for illustrative purposes. No
specific estimates and assumptions were utilized relating to
industry performance and competition, general business,
economic, market and financial conditions, or any additional
matters specific to Comtechs businesses, all of which are
difficult to predict and many of which are beyond Comtechs
control. These illustrative assumptions are likely to be
different than actual results for any number of reasons,
including general economic conditions, competition and the risks
discussed in this proxy statement/prospectus under the section
titled Risk Factors beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus and the risk factors
found under Part I, Item IA, Risk Factors
in Comtechs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended July 31, 2009.
Since the illustrative financial projections cover multiple
years, such information by its nature becomes less meaningful
and reliable with each successive year. The illustrative
financial projections also do not take into
69
account any circumstances or events occurring after the date on
which they were prepared and do not give effect to the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
merger. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the results
reflected in the illustrative financial projections will be
realized, and actual results may vary materially from those
reflected in such illustrative financial projections. You should
read the section entitled Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus for additional
information regarding the risks inherent in forward-looking
information such as the illustrative financial projections.
The following projected financial data for Comtech on a
standalone basis was provided by Comtech management to CPI
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY2010E
|
|
|
FY2011E
|
|
|
FY2012E
|
|
|
FY2013E
|
|
|
FY2014E
|
|
|
FY2015E
|
|
|
Total Sales
|
|
$
|
750,001
|
|
|
$
|
685,388
|
|
|
$
|
726,200
|
|
|
$
|
769,499
|
|
|
$
|
815,795
|
|
|
$
|
864,925
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
100,760
|
|
|
|
121,603
|
|
|
|
134,021
|
|
|
|
146,517
|
|
|
|
160,098
|
|
|
|
174,459
|
|
EBITDA*
|
|
|
127,888
|
|
|
|
148,926
|
|
|
|
161,824
|
|
|
|
175,637
|
|
|
|
190,467
|
|
|
|
205,893
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(both amortization of intangible assets and stock-based
compensation). |
Readers of this proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned not to
place any reliance on the summary of the illustrative financial
projections set forth above. No representation is made by
Comtech, CPI or any other person to any stockholder of Comtech
or any stockholder of CPI regarding the ultimate performance of
Comtech compared to the information included in the above
summary of the illustrative financial projections. The inclusion
of the summary of the illustrative financial projections in this
proxy statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an
indication that such illustrative financial projections will be
an accurate prediction of future events nor construed as
financial guidance, and they should not be relied on as such.
Comtech has made no representation to CPI or any other person
concerning the projected financial data.
COMTECH DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE
ILLUSTRATIVE FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES
EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE
OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE
ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH ILLUSTRATIVE FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
ARE NO LONGER APPROPRIATE.
Certain
Illustrative Financial Projections Provided by CPI
During the course of the negotiations between Comtech and CPI,
CPI supplied its financial advisors and Comtech with certain
business and financial information that was not publicly
available, including certain illustrative financial projections
on a standalone basis.
The illustrative financial projections presented below have been
prepared by, and are the responsibility of, the management of
CPI. The illustrative financial projections were not prepared in
connection with a detailed analysis of the fundamentals of
CPIs business and assets. For more information, see the
section titled Where you Can Find More Information
beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
The summary of the illustrative financial projections is
included in this proxy statement/prospectus only because this
information was exchanged between CPI and its financial advisors
in connection with the proposed merger and Comtech was provided
similar information in connection with the proposed merger. The
inclusion of the summary of illustrative financial projections
should not be regarded as an indication that either CPI or
Comtech considered the illustrative financial projections to be
material and the summary is not being included in this proxy
statement/prospectus for the purpose of influencing your
decision whether to vote for the adoption of the merger
agreement. Such illustrative financial projections were neither
prepared with a view to public disclosure, nor were such
illustrative financial projections prepared in compliance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles or with
published guidelines of the SEC or the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants regarding financial projections.
CPIs independent public registered accounting firm has not
examined or compiled
70
any of the illustrative financial projections, expressed any
conclusion or provided any form of assurance with respect to the
illustrative financial projections and, accordingly, assumes no
responsibility for them.
CPI cautions you that the illustrative financial projections are
speculative in nature and based upon subjective decisions and
assumptions. The illustrative financial projections were
prepared as of April 15, 2010 and do not reflect actual
results through CPIs recent quarter ended April 2,
2010. The illustrative financial projections were not prepared
with a view toward public disclosure and are inherently subject
to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors and events
beyond the control of the parties and their respective advisors,
and the inclusion of this information should not be regarded
as an indication that any of CPI or Comtech or any recipient of
this information considered, or now considers, it to be
necessarily predictive of actual future results.
While presented with numerical specificity, the illustrative
financial projections are necessarily speculative given the time
periods involved and are intended to show the impact of a given
revenue and EBITDA growth rate for illustrative purposes. Except
as noted below with respect to currency conversion rates, no
specific estimates and assumptions were utilized relating to
industry performance and competition, general business,
economic, market and financial conditions, or any additional
matters specific to CPIs businesses, all of which are
difficult to predict and many of which are beyond CPIs
control. These illustrative assumptions are likely to be
different than actual results for any number of reasons,
including general economic conditions, competition and the risks
discussed in this proxy statement/prospectus under the section
titled Risk Factors beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus and the risk factors
found under Part I, Item IA, Risk Factors
in CPIs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended October 2, 2009, and Part II,
Item IA, Risk Factors in CPIs Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 2, 2010.
Since the illustrative financial projections cover multiple
years, such information by its nature becomes less meaningful
and reliable with each successive year. The illustrative
financial projections also do not take into account any
circumstances or events occurring after the date they were
prepared and do not give effect to the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement, including the merger. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the results reflected in the
illustrative financial projections will be realized, and actual
results may vary materially from those reflected in such
illustrative financial projections. You should read the section
entitled Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus for additional
information regarding the risks inherent in forward-looking
information such as the illustrative financial projections.
The following projected financial data for CPI on a standalone
basis was provided by CPI management to CPIs financial
advisors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY2010E
|
|
FY2011E
|
|
FY2012E
|
|
FY2013E
|
|
FY2014E
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
365.0
|
|
|
$
|
386.0
|
|
|
$
|
420.5
|
|
|
$
|
458.6
|
|
|
$
|
499.2
|
|
EBITDA*
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
68.0
|
|
|
|
76.5
|
|
|
|
85.8
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
Also excludes charges related to the extinguishment of debt. |
The illustrative financial projections were based on similar
financial projections prepared by CPI in September 2009 and
provided to Comtech at that time. The financial projections
summarized in the table above differ from those provided to
Comtech due to different assumptions regarding exchange rates
between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar for fiscal
years 2011 through 2014. As a result of the change in exchange
rate assumptions, the projected EBITDA figures provided to
Comtech for each of the fiscal years 2011 through 2014 were
approximately 9% to 11% greater than the corresponding values
set forth above.
Readers of this proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned not to
place any reliance on the summary of the illustrative financial
projections set forth above. No representation is made by CPI,
Comtech or any other person to any stockholder of CPI or any
stockholder of Comtech regarding the ultimate performance of CPI
compared to the information included in the above summary of the
illustrative financial projections. The inclusion of the summary
of the illustrative financial projections in this proxy
statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an indication
that such illustrative financial projections will be an accurate
prediction of future events nor construed as financial
71
guidance, and they should not be relied on as such. CPI has made
no representation to its financial advisors, Comtech or any
other person concerning the projected financial data.
CPI DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE
ILLUSTRATIVE FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES
EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE
OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE
ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH ILLUSTRATIVE FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
ARE NO LONGER APPROPRIATE.
Regulatory
Approvals Required for the Merger
General
Each of Comtechs, CPIs and Merger Subs
obligation to effect the merger is conditioned upon, among other
things, the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting
period under the HSR Act. See The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Department
of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and Other U.S. Antitrust
Authorities
Under the HSR Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder, certain transactions, including the merger, may not
be consummated unless certain waiting period requirements have
expired or been terminated. The HSR Act provides that each party
(and, as applicable, its ultimate parent entities) must file a
pre-merger notification with the Federal Trade Commission, or
the FTC, and the Antitrust Division of the Department of
Justice, or the DOJ. A transaction notifiable under the HSR Act
may not be completed until the expiration of a 30-calendar-day
waiting period following the parties filing of their
respective HSR Act notification forms or the early termination
of that waiting period. If the DOJ or the FTC issues a Request
for Additional Information and Documentary Material prior to the
expiration of the initial waiting period, the parties must
observe a second
30-day
waiting period, which would begin to run only after both parties
have substantially complied with the request for additional
information, unless the waiting period is terminated earlier.
CPI and Comtech have filed their required HSR notification and
regulatory forms in other jurisdictions with respect to the
merger and various governmental reviews are underway.
Notwithstanding such expiration, at any time before or after the
merger is completed, either the DOJ or the FTC could take action
under the antitrust laws in opposition to the merger, including
seeking to enjoin completion of the merger, condition approval
of the merger upon the divestiture of assets of Comtech, CPI or
their subsidiaries or impose restrictions on Comtechs
post-merger operations. In addition, U.S. state attorneys
general could take action under the antitrust laws as they deem
necessary or desirable in the public interest including without
limitation seeking to enjoin the completion of the merger or
permitting completion subject to regulatory concessions or
conditions. Private parties may also seek to take legal action
under the antitrust laws under some circumstances.
Non-U.S.
Antitrust Approvals
Comtech and CPI have filed a notification with respect to the
merger to the Brazilian competition authority, CADE (the
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica, or
Administrative Council for Economic Defense), under the
applicable Brazilian antitrust merger control laws (i.e.,
Federal Law #8,884/94, article 54) on
May 28, 2010. The review of the merger by CADE will not
prevent Comtech and CPI from completing the merger.
The merger review process in Brazil involves three different
agencies, and the review period is divided into three phases.
Initially, the SEAE (the Secretaria de Acompanhamento
Econômico or Secretariat of Economic Monitoring) has
30 days from its receipt of the notification to issue its
(non-binding) opinion on the transaction. Upon expiration of
this 30-day
period, the file is transmitted to the SDE (the Secretaria de
Direito Econômico or Secretariat of Economic Law). From
the date of its receipt of the file from the SEAE, the SDE has
30 days to issue its (non-binding) opinion to CADE.
Finally, CADE has 60 days (from the date it receives the
file from SDE) to issue a final decision. If CADE does not issue
a decision within the statutory period, the transaction is
deemed approved.
72
The review period may be significantly extended if any of the
three agencies request additional documents or information from
the parties involved in the transaction.
Challenges
by Governmental and Other Entities
Notwithstanding the expiration of the initial waiting period
under the HSR Act, there can be no assurance that any of the
governmental or other entities described above, including the
DOJ, the FTC, foreign competition law authorities,
U.S. state attorneys general and private parties, will not
challenge the merger on antitrust or competition grounds and, if
such a challenge is made, there can be no assurance as to its
result.
Other
Governmental Approvals
A division of CPI utilizes radioactive materials in
manufacturing certain products, and such division currently
holds both U.S. federal and state licenses for the use of
these radioactive materials. In connection with the merger,
control of these licenses is deemed to be transferred from CPI
to Comtech. CPI is required to file and obtain approval from the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the State of Massachusetts
Radiation Control Program for the transfer of control of these
licenses.
Appraisal
Rights
In connection with the merger, record holders of CPI common
stock who comply with Section 262 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (which is referred to
in this proxy statement/prospectus as
Section 262) will be entitled to appraisal rights if
the merger is completed. Under Section 262, as a result of
completion of the merger, holders of shares of CPI common stock,
with respect to which appraisal rights are properly demanded and
perfected and not withdrawn or lost, are entitled, in lieu of
receiving the merger consideration, to have the fair
value of their shares at the completion of the merger
(exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger) judicially
determined and paid to them in cash by complying with the
provisions of Section 262. CPI is required to send a notice
to that effect to each stockholder not less than 20 days
prior to the special meeting. This proxy statement/prospectus
constitutes that notice to you.
The following is a brief summary of Section 262, which sets
forth the procedures for exercising statutory appraisal rights.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to
Section 262, a copy of the text of which is attached to
this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C. This discussion
and Annex C should be reviewed carefully by any holder who
wishes to exercise statutory appraisal rights or who wishes to
preserve the right to do so, as failure to comply with the
procedures set forth herein or therein will result in the loss
of appraisal rights. The following summary does not constitute
any legal or other advice nor does it constitute a
recommendation that stockholders exercise their appraisal rights
under Section 262.
Stockholders of record who desire to exercise their appraisal
rights must satisfy all of the following conditions. All
references in this summary of appraisal rights to a
stockholder or holder of shares of CPI
common stock are to the record holder or holders of shares of
CPI common stock.
A stockholder who desires to exercise appraisal rights must
(i) not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger
agreement, (ii) deliver in the manner set forth below a
written demand for appraisal of the stockholders shares to
the Corporate Secretary of CPI before the vote on the adoption
of the merger agreement at the special meeting at which the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement will be submitted to CPI
stockholders, (iii) continuously hold the shares of record
from the date of making the demand through the effective time of
the merger because appraisal rights will be lost if the shares
are transferred prior to the effective time of the merger, and
(iv) otherwise comply with the requirements of
Section 262.
Only a holder of record of CPI common stock is entitled to
demand an appraisal of the shares registered in that
holders name. A demand for appraisal must be executed by
or for the stockholder of record, fully and correctly, and must
reasonably inform CPI of the identity of the stockholder and
that such stockholder intends thereby to demand appraisal of the
CPI stock. If shares are owned of record in a fiduciary
capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, such
demand must be executed by the fiduciary. If shares are owned of
record by more than one person,
73
as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common, the demand must be
executed by all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an
agent of two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for
appraisal for a stockholder of record; however, the agent must
identify the record owner and expressly disclose that, in
exercising the demand, the agent is acting as agent for the
record owner. If a stockholder holds shares of CPI common stock
through a broker who in turn holds the shares through a central
securities depository nominee such as Cede & Co., a
demand for appraisal of such shares must be made by or on behalf
of the depository nominee and must identify the depository
nominee as record holder.
A record owner, such as a broker or depository, who holds shares
as a nominee for others may exercise appraisal rights with
respect to the shares held for all or less than all beneficial
owners of shares for which the holder is the record owner. In
that case, the written demand must set forth the number of
shares covered by the demand. Where the number of shares is not
expressly stated, the demand will be presumed to cover all
shares outstanding in the name of the record owner.
Beneficial owners who are not record owners and who intend to
exercise appraisal rights should instruct the record owner to
comply strictly with the statutory requirements with respect to
the exercise of appraisal rights before the vote on the adoption
of the merger agreement at the special meeting. A holder of
shares held in street name who desires appraisal
rights with respect to those shares must take such actions as
may be necessary to ensure that a timely and proper demand for
appraisal is made by the record owner of the shares. Shares held
through brokerage firms, banks and other financial institutions
are frequently deposited with and held of record in the name of
a nominee of a central security depositary, such as
Cede & Co., The Depository Trust Companys
nominee. Any holder of shares desiring appraisal rights with
respect to such shares who held such shares through a brokerage
firm, bank or other financial institution is responsible for
ensuring that the demand for appraisal is made by the record
holder. The stockholder should instruct such firm, bank or
institution that the demand for appraisal must be made by the
record holder of the shares, which might be the nominee of a
central security depositary if the shares have been so deposited.
Stockholders of record who elect to demand appraisal of their
shares must mail or deliver their written demand to: CPI, 811
Hansen Way, Palo Alto, California 94303, Attention: Corporate
Secretary. The written demand for appraisal should specify the
stockholders name and mailing address, the number of
shares owned and that the stockholder is demanding appraisal of
his, her or its shares. The written demand must be received by
CPI prior to the special meeting. Neither voting (in person or
by proxy) against, abstaining from voting on or failing to vote
on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will alone suffice
to constitute a written demand for appraisal within the meaning
of Section 262. In addition, the stockholder must not vote
its shares of common stock in favor of adoption of the merger
agreement. Because a proxy that does not contain voting
instructions will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of adoption
of the merger agreement, it will constitute a waiver of the
stockholders right of appraisal and will nullify any
previously delivered written demand for appraisal. Therefore, a
stockholder who votes by proxy and who wishes to exercise
appraisal rights must vote against the adoption of the merger
agreement or abstain from voting on the adoption of the merger
agreement.
Within 120 days after the effective time of the merger, but
not thereafter, either the surviving corporation in the merger
or any stockholder who has timely and properly demanded
appraisal of such stockholders shares and who has complied
with the requirements of Section 262 and is otherwise
entitled to appraisal rights, or any beneficial owner for which
a demand for appraisal has been properly made by the record
holder, may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a
petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a
determination of the fair value of the shares of all
stockholders who have properly demanded appraisal, with a copy
served on the surviving corporation in the case of a petition
filed by a stockholder.
There is no present intent on the part of the surviving
corporation to file an appraisal petition and stockholders
seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that the
surviving corporation will file such a petition or that the
surviving corporation will initiate any negotiations with
respect to the fair value of such shares. Accordingly,
stockholders who desire to have their shares appraised should
initiate any petitions necessary for the perfection of their
appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner
prescribed in Section 262. Within 120 days after the
effective time, any stockholder who has theretofore complied
with the applicable provisions of Section 262 will be
entitled, upon written request, to receive from the surviving
corporation a statement setting forth the aggregate
74
number of shares of common stock not voting in favor of the
merger and with respect to which demands for appraisal were
received by the surviving corporation and the number of holders
of such shares. A person who is the beneficial owner of shares
held in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person
may, in such persons own name, file a petition or request
from the corporation the statement described in the previous
sentence. Such statement must be mailed within 10 days
after the written request therefor has been received by the
surviving corporation.
If a petition for an appraisal is timely filed, at the hearing
on such petition, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine
which stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights. The
Delaware Court of Chancery may require the stockholders who have
demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock
represented by certificates to submit their certificates of
stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the
pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder
fails to comply with such direction, the Delaware Court of
Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.
Where proceedings are not dismissed, the appraisal proceeding
shall be conducted, as to the shares of common stock owned by
such stockholders, in accordance with the rules of the Delaware
Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing
appraisal proceedings.
After a hearing on such petition, the Delaware Court of Chancery
will determine which stockholders are entitled to appraisal
rights and thereafter will appraise the shares owned by those
stockholders, determining the fair value of the shares exclusive
of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or
expectation of the merger, together with interest to be paid, if
any, upon the amount determined to be the fair value. Unless the
Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines
otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date
of the merger through the date of payment of the judgment shall
be compounded quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal
Reserve discount rate (including any surcharges) as established
from time to time during the period between the effective date
of the merger and the date of payment of the judgment. In
determining fair value, the Delaware Court of Chancery is to
take into account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v.
UOP, Inc., et al., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the
factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an
appraisal proceeding, stating that proof of value by any
techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable
in the financial community and otherwise admissible in
court should be considered and that [f]air price
obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors
involving the value of a company. The Delaware Supreme
Court stated that in making this determination of fair value the
court must consider market value, asset value, dividends,
earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other
facts which were known or which could be ascertained as of the
date of merger which throw any light on future prospects of the
merged corporation. The Delaware Supreme Court construed
Section 262 to mean that elements of future value,
including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or
susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the
product of speculation, may be considered. However, the
Delaware Supreme Court noted that Section 262 provides that
fair value is to be determined exclusive of any element of
value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the
merger.
Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should bear in mind
that the fair value of their shares determined under
Section 262 could be more than, the same as, or less than
the merger consideration they are entitled to receive pursuant
to the merger agreement if they do not seek appraisal of their
shares, and that opinions of investment banking firms as to the
fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration
payable in a transaction are not opinions as to, and do not
address, fair value under Section 262. Neither Comtech nor
CPI anticipates offering more than the applicable merger
consideration to any CPI stockholder exercising appraisal
rights, and they reserve the right to assert, in any appraisal
proceeding, that for purposes of Section 262, the
fair value of a share of CPI common stock is less
than the applicable merger consideration.
The cost of the appraisal proceeding may be determined by the
Delaware Court of Chancery and charged upon the parties as the
Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable in the circumstances.
However, costs do not include attorneys and expert witness
fees. Each dissenting holder is responsible for his or her
attorneys and expert witness fees, although upon
application of a stockholder seeking appraisal rights, the
Delaware Court of Chancery may order that all or a portion of
the expenses incurred by such stockholder in connection with the
appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys fees and the fees and expenses of experts, be
charged pro rata against the value of all shares entitled to
appraisal. In the absence of such a determination of assessment,
each party bears its own expenses.
75
Any stockholder who has duly demanded appraisal in compliance
with Section 262 will not, after the effective time, be
entitled to vote for any purpose any shares subject to such
demand or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions
on such shares, except for dividends or distributions payable to
stockholders of record at a date prior to the effective time.
Except as explained in the last sentence of this paragraph, at
any time within 60 days after the effective time of the
merger, any stockholder who has demanded appraisal and who has
not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding
as a named party shall have the right to withdraw such
stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept the cash
and Comtech common stock to which the stockholder is entitled
pursuant to the merger by delivering to the surviving
corporation a written withdrawal of his or her demand for
appraisal and acceptance of the merger consideration. After this
period, the stockholder may withdraw such stockholders
demand for appraisal only with the consent of the surviving
corporation. If no petition for appraisal is filed with the
Delaware Court of Chancery within 120 days after the
effective time of the merger, stockholders rights to
appraisal shall cease and all stockholders shall be entitled
only to receive the merger consideration as provided for in the
merger agreement. Inasmuch as the parties to the merger
agreement have no obligation to file such a petition, and have
no present intention to do so, any stockholder who desires that
such petition be filed is advised to file it on a timely basis.
No petition timely filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery
demanding appraisal shall be dismissed as to any stockholders
without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and that
approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware
Court of Chancery deems just. However, the preceding sentence
will not affect the right of any stockholder who has not
commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined the proceeding as a
named party to withdraw such stockholders demand for
appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger within
60 days.
The foregoing is a brief summary of Section 262 that sets
forth the procedures for exercising statutory appraisal rights.
This summary, however, is not a complete statement of all
applicable requirements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to Section 262, a copy of the text of which is
attached as Annex C to this proxy statement/prospectus.
Failure to strictly comply with all the procedures set forth
in Section 262 will result in the loss of a
stockholders statutory appraisal rights. Consequently, if
you wish to exercise your appraisal rights, you are strongly
urged to consult a legal advisor before attempting to exercise
your appraisal rights.
Certain
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
The following summarizes certain material U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the merger. The following summary is
not binding on the Internal Revenue Service. It is based upon
the Internal Revenue Code, referred to in this proxy
statement/prospectus as the Code, and the regulations, rulings,
and decisions thereunder in effect as of the date of this
document, all of which are subject to change, possibly with
retroactive effect, and to differing interpretations. This
summary addresses only those stockholders who hold their shares
of CPI common stock as a capital asset within the meaning of
Section 1221 of the Code, and does not address all of the
U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant
to particular CPI stockholders in light of their individual
circumstances, or to CPI stockholders who are subject to special
rules, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
mutual funds, regulated investment companies or real estate
investment trusts;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currencies;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities who elect to apply a
market-to-market
method of accounting;
|
|
|
|
foreign holders (i.e., persons other than U.S. holders, as
defined below);
|
|
|
|
persons who actually or constructively own 5% or more of the
outstanding shares of CPI stock;
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
persons who hold shares of CPI stock as a hedge against currency
risk or as part of a straddle, constructive sale or conversion
transaction; or
|
|
|
|
holders who acquired their shares of CPI stock upon the exercise
of warrants or employee stock options or otherwise as
compensation or through a tax-qualified plan.
|
In addition, tax consequences under state, local and foreign
laws and U.S. federal laws other than U.S. federal
income tax laws are not addressed.
CPI stockholders are urged to consult their tax advisors as
to the specific tax consequences to them of the merger,
including the applicability and effect of U.S. federal,
state, local and foreign income and other tax laws in their
particular circumstances.
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. holder means a
beneficial owner of CPI stock who is:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in
the United States or under the laws of the United States or any
State or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is includible in gross income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its
source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if (i) a court within the United States is able to
exercise primary supervision over the administration of the
trust and one or more United States persons have the authority
to control all substantial decisions of the trust or
(ii) the trust has a valid election in effect under the
applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
If a business entity classified as a partnership for
U.S. federal tax purposes (a partnership) holds
CPI stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend
upon the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. Partners of partnerships holding CPI stock should
consult their own tax advisers.
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences to CPI
Stockholders
Each U.S. holder of CPI common stock will recognize gain or
loss with respect to each share of CPI common stock that it
exchanges in the merger equal to the difference, if any, between
(i) the sum of any cash received (including cash received
in lieu of a fractional share of Comtech common stock) and the
fair market value, as of the effective time of the merger, of
the shares of Comtech common stock received by such holder in
the exchange and (ii) such holders tax basis in the
shares of CPI common stock exchanged therefor. Gain or loss, as
well as the holding period, will be determined separately for
each block of shares (i.e., shares acquired at the same cost in
a single transaction) surrendered pursuant to the merger. Such
gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss, provided
that a stockholders holding period for such shares is more
than one year at the time of the consummation of the merger.
Long-term capital gains of individuals are generally eligible
for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital
losses is subject to certain limitations.
CPI
Stockholders Exercising Appraisal Rights
A U.S. holder who exercises appraisal rights under Delaware
law and receives cash in exchange for its CPI common stock will
generally recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference
between the cash received by such holder (other than any cash
received that is treated as actual or imputed interest, which
will be taxable as ordinary income) and such holders tax
basis in the CPI common stock exchanged therefor.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
A U.S. holder may be subject to information reporting and
backup withholding, currently at a rate of 28%, unless the
holder provides proof of an applicable exemption, furnishes its
taxpayer identification number (in the case of individuals,
their social security number) and otherwise complies with all
applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Any
amounts withheld from payments to a U.S. holder under the
backup withholding
77
rules are not additional tax and will be allowed as a refund or
credit against the U.S. holders U.S. federal
income tax liability, provided the required information is
timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
The summary of material U.S. federal income tax
consequences set forth above is not intended to be a complete
analysis or description of all potential United States federal
income tax consequences of the merger. Moreover, the summary set
forth above does not address tax consequences that may vary
with, or are contingent upon, individual circumstances. In
addition, the summary set forth above does not address any
non-income tax or any foreign, state or local tax consequences
of the merger and does not address the tax consequences of any
transaction other than the merger.
Accounting
Treatment
The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition of a
business. Comtech will record net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed from CPI at
their respective fair values at the date of the completion of
the merger. Any excess of the purchase price, which will equal
the market value, at the date of the completion of the merger,
of the Comtech common stock issued as consideration for the
merger, over the net fair value of such assets and liabilities
will be recorded as goodwill.
The financial condition and results of operations of Comtech
after completion of the merger will reflect CPIs balances
and results after completion of the transaction but will not be
restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial
condition or results of operations of CPI. The earnings of
Comtech following the completion of the merger will reflect
acquisition accounting adjustments, including the effect of
changes in the carrying value for assets and liabilities on
depreciation and amortization expense. Intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives and goodwill will not be amortized but
will be tested for impairment at least annually, and all assets
including goodwill will be tested for impairment when certain
indicators are present. If in the future, Comtech determines
that tangible or intangible assets (including goodwill) are
impaired, Comtech would record an impairment charge at that time.
Listing
of Comtech Common Stock and Delisting and Deregistration of CPI
Common Stock
Application will be made to have the shares of Comtech common
stock to be issued in the merger approved for listing on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market, where Comtech common stock is
currently traded. If the merger is completed, CPI common stock
will no longer be listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and
will be deregistered under the Exchange Act.
Repayment
of Existing CPI Indebtedness
Comtech intends to repay in full all existing outstanding
indebtedness of CPI either upon the closing or shortly following
closing, in each case in accordance with the terms of such
indebtedness. Assuming that the appropriate notices required
under the indentures governing CPIs existing floating rate
senior notes and senior subordinated notes outstanding are
provided on the date of closing of the merger, these notes may
be outstanding for up to 75 days following the closing of
the merger.
78
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms and conditions
of the merger agreement. This summary may not contain all the
information about the merger agreement that is important to you.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
merger agreement attached as Annex A to, and incorporated
by reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus. You are
encouraged to read the merger agreement in its entirety because
it is the legal document that governs the merger.
Explanatory
Note Regarding the Merger Agreement and the Summary of the
Merger Agreement: Representations, Warranties and Covenants in
the Merger Agreement Are Not Intended to Function or Be Relied
on as Public Disclosures
The merger agreement and the summary of its terms in this proxy
statement/prospectus have been included to provide information
about the terms and conditions of the merger agreement. The
terms and information in the merger agreement are not intended
to provide any other public disclosure of factual information
about Comtech, CPI or any of their respective subsidiaries or
affiliates. The representations, warranties and covenants
contained in the merger agreement are made by Comtech, CPI and
Merger Sub only for the purposes of the merger agreement and
were qualified and subject to certain limitations and exceptions
agreed to by Comtech, CPI and Merger Sub in connection with
negotiating the terms of the merger agreement. In particular, in
your review of the representations and warranties contained in
the merger agreement and described in this summary, it is
important to bear in mind that the representations and
warranties were made solely for the benefit of the parties to
the merger agreement and were negotiated for the purpose of
allocating contractual risk among the parties to the merger
agreement rather than to establish matters as facts. The
representations and warranties may also be subject to a
contractual standard of materiality or material adverse effect
different from those generally applicable to stockholders and
reports and documents filed with the SEC, and, in some cases,
they may be qualified by disclosures made by one party to the
other, which are not necessarily reflected in the merger
agreement. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter
of the representations and warranties, which do not purport to
be accurate as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus,
may have changed since the date of the merger agreement, and
subsequent developments or new information qualifying a
representation or warranty may have been included in or
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
For the foregoing reasons, the representations, warranties and
covenants or any descriptions of those provisions should not be
read alone or relied upon as characterizations of the actual
state of facts or condition of Comtech, CPI or any of their
respective subsidiaries or affiliates. Instead, such provisions
or descriptions should be read only in conjunction with the
other information provided elsewhere in this document or
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
See Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Form,
Effective Time and Closing of the Merger
The merger agreement provides for a transaction in which Merger
Sub will merge with and into CPI. CPI will be the surviving
corporation in the merger and, following completion of the
merger, will be a wholly owned subsidiary of Comtech.
The merger will become effective upon the filing of a
certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware. Unless another date and time are agreed by Comtech
and CPI, the closing will occur no later than the second
business day following satisfaction or, to the extent permitted
under applicable law, waiver, of the conditions to completion of
the merger. See Conditions to the Completion
of the Merger beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
There can be no assurances as to when, or if, the merger will
occur. If the merger is not completed on or before
December 1, 2010, either Comtech or CPI may terminate the
merger agreement, unless the failure to comply in any material
respect with any provision of the merger agreement by the party
seeking to terminate the merger agreement was the direct cause
of the failure of the merger to be completed by that date. The
termination date of December 1, 2010 may be extended
by 45 days by either party, subject to certain limitations,
if the closing has not occurred because of the failure to obtain
a required approval from one or more regulatory authorities. See
Conditions to
79
the Completion of the Merger and
Termination of the Merger Agreement
beginning on pages
[l]
and
[l],
respectively, of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Certificate
of Incorporation, Bylaws, Directors and Officers of the
Surviving Corporation
After completion of the merger, the certificate of incorporation
of the surviving corporation will be amended so as to read in
the form of an exhibit to the merger agreement, and the bylaws
of Merger Sub in effect as of the effective time of the merger
will be the bylaws of the surviving corporation, in each case
until amended in accordance with applicable law. After
completion of the merger, the directors of Merger Sub and the
officers of CPI will be the directors and officers of the
surviving corporation until their successors are duly elected or
appointed and qualified in accordance with the certificate of
incorporation and bylaws of the surviving corporation and
applicable law.
Merger
Consideration; Conversion or Cancellation of Shares in the
Merger
Merger
Consideration
If the merger is completed, each share of CPI common stock
(other than treasury stock or CPI common stock held by Comtech
or its subsidiaries or CPI common stock with respect to which
appraisal rights have been properly exercised and perfected
under Delaware law) will be cancelled and converted
automatically into the right to receive $9.00 in cash and
between 0.2132 and 0.2382 shares of Comtech common stock
(and dividends, if any, on Comtech common stock with a record
date after the date of the merger agreement and before the
effective time of the merger). The exact number of shares of
Comtech common stock to be received in the merger will be
determined based on a conversion ratio (rounded to four decimal
places) equal to $8.10 divided by the average closing price of
Comtechs stock over the five consecutive trading days
ending on (and including) the second trading day prior to
closing, provided that if such average closing price of Comtech
common stock is greater than $38.00, then the conversion ratio
will equal 0.2132, and if such average closing sale price is
less than $34.00, then the conversion ratio will equal 0.2382.
CPI stockholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional
shares of Comtech common stock as described immediately below.
No interest will be paid or accrue on the cash portion of the
merger consideration.
No
Fractional Shares
Comtech will not issue any fractional shares of its common stock
in the merger. Instead, the total number of shares of Comtech
common stock that each CPI stockholder will receive in the
merger will be rounded down to the nearest whole number, and
each CPI stockholder will receive cash, without interest, for
any fractional shares of Comtech common stock that such
stockholder would otherwise receive in the merger. The amount of
cash for fractional shares received by a CPI stockholder will be
their proportionate interest in proceeds from the sale by
Comtechs exchange agent of the aggregate of the fractional
shares of Comtech common stock that otherwise would be issued in
the merger at the prevailing prices at which Comtech common
stock may be sold (net of any related fees) on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market as soon as practicable after the effective time of
the merger.
Procedures
for Surrendering CPI Stock Certificates
The conversion of CPI common stock into the right to receive the
merger consideration will occur automatically at the effective
time of the merger. Prior to completion of the merger, Comtech
will appoint an exchange agent reasonably acceptable to CPI to
handle the exchange of CPI stock certificates in the merger for
Comtech common stock and the payment of cash (including cash in
lieu of fractional shares of Comtech common stock). Prior to the
effective time of the merger, Comtech will deliver to the
exchange agent the merger consideration payable in respect of
CPI common stock. As promptly as practicable after the effective
time, but in no event later than five business days thereafter,
the exchange agent will send a letter of transmittal to each
person who is a record holder of CPI common stock at the
effective time of the merger for use in the exchange, as well as
instructions explaining how to surrender CPI stock certificates
to the exchange agent.
Each CPI stockholder who surrenders their stock certificate to
the exchange agent or, in the case of CPI stock held in
book-entry form surrenders such stock (evidenced by receipt of
an agents message by the exchange agent), in
either case, together with a duly completed letter of
transmittal (and such other documents as may
80
reasonably be required by the exchange agent), will receive
(i) certificates (or electronic equivalents) representing
the number of shares of Comtech common stock into which such CPI
shares will have been converted, and (ii) a bank check for
an amount equal to the cash portion of the merger consideration
due to such stockholder (including cash in lieu of fractional
shares). In any event, after the effective time of the merger,
each certificate that previously represented shares of CPI
common stock will only represent the right to receive the merger
consideration into which those shares of CPI common stock have
been converted.
Neither Comtech nor CPI will be responsible for transfer or
other similar taxes and fees incurred by any holder of CPI
common stock in connection with the merger, and thus, such taxes
and fees, if any, will be the sole responsibility of such
holder. In addition, if any merger consideration is to be issued
in the name of a person other than the person in whose name a
surrendered CPI certificate is registered, the surrendered
certificate must be endorsed or must otherwise be in proper form
for transfer, and the person requesting such exchange must
either pay to the exchange agent any transfer or other taxes
required or otherwise satisfy the exchange agent that any such
transfer or other taxes have been paid or that no payment of
such taxes is necessary.
Treatment
of CPI Equity Awards
Except with respect to separate agreements that may be entered
into with certain CPI executives, each option to purchase shares
of CPI common stock granted under CPIs equity compensation
plans outstanding immediately prior to the closing, whether or
not exercisable or vested, will be canceled at the closing in
exchange for cash, equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the
sum of (A) $9.00 and (B) the average per-share closing
prices of Comtech common stock for the 10 consecutive trading
days immediately preceding the date that is two days before the
closing, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market,
multiplied by the conversion ratio, reduced by (ii) the
per-share exercise price of such option.
Except with respect to separate agreements that may be entered
into with certain CPI executives, each restricted stock award
and restricted stock unit granted under CPIs equity
compensation plans that are outstanding immediately prior to the
closing will be canceled at the closing in exchange for a
payment, in cash, equal to the sum of (i) $9.00 and
(ii) the cash value of the average per-share closing prices
of Comtech common stock for the 10 consecutive trading days
immediately preceding the date that is two days before the
closing, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market,
multiplied by the conversion ratio.
Withholding
All payments under the merger agreement are subject to
applicable withholding requirements.
Representations
and Warranties
The merger agreement contains a number of representations and
warranties made by CPI on the one hand and Comtech and Merger
Sub on the other hand. The representations and warranties were
made by the parties as of the date of the merger agreement and
expire at the effective time of the merger. The representations
and warranties are subject, in some cases, to exceptions and
qualifications (including knowledge qualifiers and exceptions
that do not result in, and would not reasonably be expected to
have, a material adverse effect). See also
Definition of Material Adverse
Effect beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Representations
and Warranties of CPI, and Comtech and Merger Sub
Both CPI and Comtech made representations and warranties in the
merger agreement relating to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate organization, valid existence, good standing and
qualification to conduct business;
|
|
|
|
capitalization;
|
|
|
|
due authorization, execution, delivery and validity of the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
absence of any conflict with organizational documents, absence
of any violation, breach or default of certain agreements and
the absence of any violation of laws or orders;
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
governmental and third-party consents necessary to complete the
merger;
|
|
|
|
SEC filings, the absence of material misstatements or omissions
from such filings and compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain changes through the date of the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
disclosure documents to be filed with the SEC in connection with
the merger;
|
|
|
|
fees payable to financial advisors in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
litigation; and
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws and orders.
|
Representations
and Warranties of CPI
In addition, CPI made representations and warranties in the
merger agreement relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
taxes;
|
|
|
|
employee benefit plans;
|
|
|
|
labor matters including matters related to labor unions and
layoffs;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters, including matters concerning hazardous
materials, environmental liabilities, compliance with
environmental laws, required environmental permits,
environmental reports, studies and other data, and
indemnification for environmental liability;
|
|
|
|
property and assets;
|
|
|
|
absence of undisclosed liabilities;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
the existence, validity and enforceability of certain contracts
meeting certain financial, legal and other thresholds, including
contracts with, or subcontracts relating to contracts with,
governmental entities;
|
|
|
|
permits and other approvals from governmental entities required
by CPI and its subsidiaries to own, lease or operate their
assets and carry on their businesses;
|
|
|
|
insurance;
|
|
|
|
transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
receipt of the opinions of J.P. Morgan and Moelis;
|
|
|
|
absence of any stockholder rights plan;
|
|
|
|
absence of beneficial ownership of any capital stock of
Comtech; and
|
|
|
|
inapplicability of Delaware anti-takeover laws.
|
Representations
and Warranties of Comtech and Merger Sub
In addition, Comtech and Merger Sub made representations and
warranties in the merger agreement relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
availability of sufficient cash resources to consummate the
merger and repay the indebtedness of CPI;
|
|
|
|
absence of any business activities or operations of Merger
Sub; and
|
|
|
|
beneficial ownership of capital stock of CPI.
|
The representations and warranties in the merger agreement do
not survive after the effective time of the merger.
82
See Explanatory Note Regarding the Merger
Agreement and the Summary of the Merger Agreement:
Representations, Warranties and Covenants in the Merger
Agreement Are Not Intended to Function or Be Relied on as Public
Disclosures on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Definition
of Material Adverse Effect
Many of the representations and warranties are qualified as to
materiality or material adverse effect. For the
purposes of the merger agreement, material adverse
effect means any adverse event, development or change in
condition of Comtech or CPI, as the case may be, or any
subsidiary thereof which is material to such party and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole; provided, however, that none of
the following, and no change, event or development to the extent
resulting from any of the following, will be taken into account
in determining the occurrence of a material adverse effect:
|
|
|
|
|
general changes in economic, market, financial or capital
market, regulatory or political conditions in the United States
or elsewhere in the world;
|
|
|
|
terrorism, war, the outbreak of hostilities or natural disaster
in the United States or elsewhere in the world;
|
|
|
|
changes generally applicable to the industries in which the
party and its subsidiaries are involved;
|
|
|
|
changes in law or accounting regulations or principles or
interpretations thereof;
|
|
|
|
changes in such partys stock price or trading volume, or
any failure, in and of itself, by the party to meet any
projections or any change in any analyst recommendation
concerning the party (it being understood that the facts or
occurrences giving rise or contributing to such change may be
deemed to constitute, or be taken into account, in determining
whether a material adverse effect has occurred);
|
|
|
|
the downgrade in rating of any debt or debt securities of a
party or any of its subsidiaries (it being understood that the
facts or occurrences giving rise or contributing to such change
may be deemed to constitute, or be taken into account, in
determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred);
|
|
|
|
the failure to take any action as a result of any restrictions
or prohibitions set forth in the merger agreement with respect
to which the other party failed, after being requested, to
provide a waiver or to do so in a reasonably timely manner;
|
|
|
|
changes as a result of any amendment, cancellation, termination
or other adverse event related to any existing contract of the
party or any of its subsidiaries, or the failure by the party or
any of its subsidiaries to enter into, or be awarded the right
to enter into or receive funding under, any contract or any
extension thereof;
|
|
|
|
changes as a result of any action consented to in writing by the
other party;
|
|
|
|
the taking of any action expressly contemplated or required by
the merger agreement, or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
any actions, claims, suits or proceedings arising out of or
related to the merger agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
except to the extent, in the case of the first four bullet
points above, that such changes would reasonably be expected to
have a materially disproportionate impact on the condition
(financial or otherwise), business, properties or results of
operations of the party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
relative to other participants in the industries in which the
party and its subsidiaries are involved (in which event the
extent of such material adverse change may be taken into account
in determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred).
Covenants
and Agreements
Conduct
of Business of CPI Pending the Merger
CPI has agreed to certain restrictions on it and its
subsidiaries until the effective time of the merger. In general,
except with Comtechs prior written approval or as
otherwise expressly contemplated or permitted by the merger
83
agreement, CPI has agreed that until the effective time of the
merger, it will, and will cause its subsidiaries to, conduct its
operations in the ordinary and usual course of business
consistent with past practice and, to the extent consistent
therewith, to use its reasonable best efforts to preserve intact
its present business organizations, to keep available the
services of its current officers and employees, and preserve its
relationships with customers, suppliers and others having
business dealings with it to the end that goodwill and ongoing
businesses will not be impaired in any material respect at the
effective time of the merger. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, CPI has also agreed, except with Comtechs
prior written approval or as otherwise expressly contemplated or
permitted by the merger agreement that, until the effective time
of the merger it will not and its subsidiaries will not, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
issue, deliver, sell, dispose of, pledge or otherwise encumber
its capital stock, or any securities or rights convertible into
or exchangeable for any such shares or ownership interests or
permit or authorize any of the above other than the issuance of
shares in connection with the exercise of options under any CPI
equity compensation plan;
|
|
|
|
redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire, or propose to redeem,
purchase or otherwise acquire, its capital stock;
|
|
|
|
split, combine, subdivide or reclassify any of its capital stock;
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside for payment or pay any dividend in respect of
any shares of its capital stock, other than dividends paid by
one of its subsidiaries to another subsidiary or to CPI;
|
|
|
|
adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution,
merger, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other
reorganization of it or any of its subsidiaries or alter through
merger, liquidation, reorganization or restructuring the
corporate structure of any of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation or
amended and restated bylaws or the organizational documents of
any subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
exempt any third party from any state anti-takeover law or adopt
any shareholder rights plan;
|
|
|
|
enter into, adopt, amend, renew or extend any employee benefit
plan or any other compensatory program, policy or arrangement;
|
|
|
|
increase the compensation of, or provide any benefit to, any
current or former employee, officer, director or other
consultant except as required by applicable law or the terms of
any employee benefit plan in effect on the date of the merger
agreement or except as in the ordinary course of business in
accordance with past practice;
|
|
|
|
hire any employee, officer, director or other consultant
entitled to receive annual compensation in excess of $200,000;
|
|
|
|
terminate (other than for cause consistent with past practice)
the employment or service of any officer or director of CPI or
any of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
enter into or make any loans to any of its officers, directors,
employees, affiliates, agents or consultants (other than
business expense advances in the ordinary course consistent with
past practice) or make any change in existing borrowing or
lending arrangements except as required by any equity or benefit
plan maintained by CPI as of the date of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
make any material change in financial accounting methods,
principles or practices, except as required by a change in GAAP,
the rules or policies of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board or law;
|
|
|
|
directly or indirectly acquire or agree to acquire any equity
interest in, or business of, any entity;
|
|
|
|
other than purchases and sales of inventory and supplies in the
ordinary course of business, consistent with past practice,
acquire, sell, lease (as lessor), license, or otherwise dispose
of any tangible properties or assets in excess of $1,000,000, or
sell, lease, license, mortgage, sell and leaseback or otherwise
dispose of any real properties or any interests therein;
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
encumber any tangible properties or assets or any interests
therein except as permitted by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
make or change any material tax election or settle or compromise
any material tax liability, change its fiscal year, change any
accounting method for tax purposes and file any amended tax
return, except, in each case, as required by law;
|
|
|
|
other than in the ordinary course consistent with past practice
and other than as between CPI and its subsidiaries, grant or
acquire, or dispose of or permit to lapse, any rights to any
material intellectual property or disclose any trade secret to
any person other than the representatives of Comtech;
|
|
|
|
incur any indebtedness (subject to certain thresholds and
ordinary course exceptions), except for (i) indebtedness
incurred in the ordinary course of business under CPIs
existing credit agreement, provided that such indebtedness may
not exceed the amount outstanding as of the date of the merger
agreement; (ii) guarantees by CPI or its subsidiaries of
the indebtedness of CPI or any of its subsidiaries; or
(iii) indebtedness among CPI and its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
make, or agree or commit to make, any capital expenditure in
excess of $1,000,000 or capital expenditures which in the
aggregate exceed $3,000,000 for each six-month period beginning
on the date of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
enter into or amend any contract or take any other action if
such contract, amendment or action would reasonably be expected
to prevent or materially impede, interfere with, hinder or delay
the consummation of the merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
enter into or amend any contract (including any exclusivity
agreement) materially restricting the right of CPI to conduct
its business as it is presently conducted or which could require
the disposition of any material assets or line of business of
CPI;
|
|
|
|
enter into or amend any material contract to the extent that
consummation of the merger would reasonably be expected to
conflict with, or have certain other adverse consequences with
respect to obligations or assets of CPI, or enter into certain
contracts not in the ordinary course of business which are not
terminable without penalty on notice of 90 days or less;
|
|
|
|
voluntarily contribute or commit cash or funds to any pension
plans or any administrator thereof for purposes of funding
shortfalls in any pension plan other than as required by law;
|
|
|
|
enter into a new line of business or engage in the conduct of
any business other than the current lines of business of CPI and
its subsidiaries and products and services reasonably ancillary
thereto, or enter into a contract which limits or restricts CPI
and its subsidiaries or Comtech and its affiliates from engaging
or competing in any material line of business or in any material
geographic area;
|
|
|
|
file for any permit or approval outside of the ordinary course
of business, the receipt of which would reasonably be likely to
prevent or materially impair or delay the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
settle, compromise, dismiss, discharge or otherwise dispose of
litigation or proceedings other than those that (i) do not
involve payment of damages in excess of $50,000 individually or
$100,000 in the aggregate, plus applicable reserves and
insurance coverage, and do not involve material injunctive or
other non-monetary relief or impose material restrictions on the
business or operations of CPI or its subsidiaries and
(ii) provide a complete release of CPI and its subsidiaries
for all claims; provided, however, that CPI may settle,
compromise, dismiss, discharge or otherwise dispose of
litigation or proceedings based on the merger which involve
payment of damages not in excess of $1,000,000 in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would reasonably be expected to materially
restrict or impede the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement or cause any of the
conditions to the closing of the merger as set forth in the
merger agreement to fail to be satisfied as of the closing date;
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
except as described below under Covenants and
Agreements No Solicitation of Transactions by
CPI, approve or authorize any action to be submitted to
the stockholders of CPI for approval that is intended, or would
reasonably be expected, to prevent, impede, interfere with,
delay, postpone or adversely affect the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
enter into any settlement or commitment with any person (whether
oral or in writing), including, without limitation, the City of
Palo Alto, that may adversely affect any of the operations
currently conducted at 607, 811 and 3120 Hansen Way, Palo Alto,
California; or
|
|
|
|
authorize any of, or commit, resolve or agree to take any of the
foregoing actions.
|
No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI
CPI will not nor will it permit any of its subsidiaries to, nor
will it authorize or knowingly permit any of its or any of its
subsidiaries officers, directors, employees or
representatives to (i) solicit, initiate or otherwise
knowingly facilitate or encourage the submission of any
acquisition proposal (as defined below), (ii) participate
in any discussions or negotiations regarding any acquisition
proposal or furnish to any person any non-public information
with respect to or access to the properties of CPI in connection
with an acquisition proposal, (iii) enter into any
agreement or other understanding with respect to any acquisition
proposal or enter into any agreement requiring CPI to terminate
or otherwise fail to consummate the merger or (iv) fail to
make, or withdraw or modify in a manner adverse to Comtech, the
recommendation of the CPI board of directors in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement. Notwithstanding these
restrictions, however, the merger agreement provides that, under
specified circumstances at any time prior to the adoption of the
merger agreement by CPI stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
CPI may, in response to an unsolicited acquisition proposal from
a third party that the CPI board of directors or a committee
thereof determines constitutes, or would reasonably be expected
to lead to, a superior acquisition proposal (as defined below),
directly or through its representatives, participate in
negotiations or discussions with such party and furnish
non-public information to such third party pursuant to a
customary confidentiality agreement (provided that all such
information is or has been provided or made available to
Comtech).
|
|
|
|
The CPI board of directors or any committee thereof may fail to
make, or withdraw or modify in a manner adverse to Comtech, its
recommendation in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement
or may approve, recommend or endorse an unsolicited acquisition
proposal, in each case either (i) following receipt of an
unsolicited acquisition proposal made after the date of the
merger agreement that CPIs board of directors or a
committee thereof determines constitutes a superior acquisition
proposal or (ii) in response to a material event,
development, circumstance, occurrence or change in circumstances
or facts not related to a competing acquisition proposal that
was not known to CPIs board of directors or a committee
thereof on the date of the merger agreement (or if known, the
magnitude or material consequences of which were not known or
understood as of that date).
|
Notwithstanding the two bullet points above, the CPI board of
directors or a committee thereof may not change its
recommendation or approve an unsolicited acquisition proposal
unless CPI notifies Comtech of its intention to do so (together
with a copy of the agreement for any proposed acquisition
proposal) at least three business days prior to taking such
action and Comtech does not, within three business days of
receipt of such notice, make an offer that the CPI board of
directors or a committee thereof determines, in good faith,
after consultation with its outside financial and legal
advisors, is at least as favorable to CPI stockholders as the
acquisition proposal (if the intended recommendation change
relates to an acquisition proposal) or that would obviate the
need for the recommendation change (if the intended
recommendation change relates to any other event). Furthermore,
the actions described in the preceding two bullet points may be
taken only if the CPI board of directors or a committee thereof
determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal advisors, that failure to take such action would be
reasonably likely to constitute a violation of its fiduciary
duties under Delaware law.
CPIs board of directors also may respond to any tender
offer that may be made in order to comply with the requirements
of
Rule 14e-2
or
Rule 14d-9
under the Exchange Act and make any disclosure to its
stockholders if required by law or by the rules and regulations
of the NASDAQ Global Select Market or, if the board of
directors,
86
after consultation with counsel, concludes in good faith that
making such disclosure is required in order for the board to
comply with its fiduciary duties under applicable law.
Comtech has the right to terminate the merger agreement if,
prior to the special meeting, the CPI board of directors or a
committee of the board of directors changes its recommendation
in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner
adverse to Comtech. CPI has the right to terminate the merger
agreement in order to enter into an acquisition that is a
superior acquisition proposal. See Termination
of the Merger Agreement beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
For the purposes of the merger agreement, acquisition
proposal means any proposal or offer, whether in writing
or otherwise, from any third party (other than Comtech, Merger
Sub or their affiliates) to acquire beneficial ownership (as
determined under
Rule 13d-3
of the Exchange Act) of all or more than 15% of the assets of
CPI and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or 15% or more of
any class of equity securities of CPI pursuant to a merger,
consolidation or other business combination, sale of shares of
stock, sale of assets, tender offer, exchange offer or similar
transaction or series of related transactions, which is
structured to permit such third party to acquire beneficial
ownership of more than 15% of the assets of CPI and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or 15% or more of any class of
equity securities of CPI.
For the purposes of the merger agreement, superior
acquisition proposal means any bona fide written
acquisition proposal not solicited or initiated in violation of
CPIs non-solicitation obligations that (i) relates to
an acquisition by a person or group acting in concert of either
(A) more than 50% of CPIs capital stock pursuant to a
tender offer, merger or otherwise or (B) more than 50% of
the assets used in the conduct of the business of CPI and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (ii) the CPI board
determines in its good faith judgment (after consultation with
outside legal counsel and the CPI boards independent
financial advisors) would, if consummated, result in a
transaction (A) that offers for each share of CPI capital
stock an amount in consideration greater than the merger
consideration as of the date of determination and (B) that
is, in light of the other terms of such proposal, more favorable
to CPI stockholders than the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, or in any other proposal made by Comtech after
Comtechs receipt of notice of CPIs proposed board
recommendation change in response to the superior acquisition
proposal, and (iii) CPIs board determines in good
faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and its
outside legal counsel) is reasonably capable of being
consummated on the terms proposed, in each case taking into
account all legal, financial, regulatory, fiduciary and other
aspects of the proposal, and for which financing, if a cash
transaction (whether in whole or in part), is then fully
committed or reasonably determined to be available by CPIs
board.
CPIs
Proxy Statement, Recommendation and Stockholders Meeting;
Comtechs Registration Statement and Listing of Shares on
NASDAQ
CPI, acting through its board, has agreed to use its reasonable
best efforts to promptly (and, in any event, within 45 days
after the date of the merger agreement) prepare and file a proxy
statement in connection with the merger, respond promptly to any
comments thereto by the Securities and Exchange Commission and
undertake to obtain the necessary approvals by its stockholders.
CPI further agreed to include its recommendation in the proxy
statement and to convene a special meeting of its stockholders,
within 45 days of the effective date of the proxy
statement, to approve and adopt the merger agreement and the
merger; provided that CPI may postpone the stockholders meeting
for a maximum of 10 business days in order to amend the proxy
statement as required by law or performance of the fiduciary
duties of CPIs board and provided further that CPIs
board may fail to make, withdraw or modify such recommendation
in certain circumstances (as described in
Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI, above).
Comtech has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to
promptly (and, in any event, within 45 days after the date
of the merger agreement) prepare and file a registration
statement on
Form S-4
and to respond promptly to any comments thereto by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Both CPI and Comtech have agreed to cause their representatives
to fully cooperate with the other in the preparation of the
proxy statement or the registration statement on
Form S-4,
as the case may be, and neither CPI nor Comtech may amend the
proxy statement or the registration statement on
Form S-4,
as the case may be, without the approval of the other party,
which may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
87
Comtech will use its reasonable best efforts to cause the shares
of Comtech common stock to be issued in connection with the
merger and approved for listing on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market (where Comtech common stock is currently listed), subject
to official notice of issuance, and CPI has agreed to reasonably
cooperate with respect to such listing. Approval for listing on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market of such shares of Comtech common
stock is a condition to the obligations of Comtech and CPI to
complete the merger. See Conditions to the
Completion of the Merger Mutual Closing
Conditions beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Efforts
to Complete Transactions
Both Comtech and CPI will use their reasonable best efforts to
take all actions, and do all things necessary, proper or
advisable under applicable laws to consummate and make effective
the merger, including, without limitation, obtaining all
necessary or appropriate permits, consents, approvals,
authorizations, qualifications and orders of governmental
entities and parties to contracts with Comtech and CPI.
Comtech and CPI have agreed to use their reasonable best efforts
to resist any action or proceeding and to contest any injunction
or other order that prevents or otherwise restricts consummation
of the merger unless either Comtech or CPI determines, in its
reasonable discretion after consulting with the other party,
that litigation is not in its best interests.
Although Comtech and CPI have agreed to use their reasonable
best efforts to obtain all regulatory approvals required to
consummate the merger, Comtech will not be required to take any
action that would result in a burdensome condition, which means
that Comtech will not be required to license, sell or dispose of
any assets or impose any limitation on the conduct of the
business of Comtech or CPI that, in either case, arise out of
this merger and would be reasonably expected after the closing
to result in the divestiture of a material asset of Comtech or
CPI or have a material adverse effect on Comtech, CPI or the
benefits which Comtech reasonably expects to be realized from
the merger. Comtech and CPI have agreed that any business or
assets acquired or to be acquired by Comtech after May 8,
2010 will not be deemed material for purposes of the previous
sentence.
Until 90 days after the date of the merger agreement,
Comtech will not, and will not permit its subsidiaries to, make
any acquisition of any entity for consideration in excess of
$150,000,000.
Comtech and CPI have agreed to cooperate in taking all actions
necessary to have CPI common stock delisted from the NASDAQ
Global Select Market and deregistered under the Exchange Act,
which will become effective upon completion of the merger.
Access
to Information
The merger agreement requires CPI to provide Comtech, upon
reasonable notice, reasonable access to its officers, employees,
accountants, consultants, representatives, plants, properties,
contracts, commitments, books and records and to reasonably
promptly furnish to Comtech all information regarding its
business, properties and personnel as reasonably requested by
Comtech. Any such access will be conducted under supervision and
may not materially interfere with CPIs operations. Other
than information provided to Comtechs counsel in
connection with HSR filings, CPI will not be required to make
available competitively sensitive pricing or customer
information.
Any such information received by either party will be treated in
accordance with a confidentiality agreement executed between
Comtech and CPI.
Publicity
Comtech and CPI agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to
consult with each other and mutually agree upon any press
release or public announcement pertaining to the merger in
advance of such announcement.
88
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers; Insurance
Under the terms of the merger agreement, for a period of six
years following the merger, the certificate of incorporation and
the bylaws of the surviving corporation will contain provisions
relating to exculpation, indemnification and advancement of
expenses that are no less favorable than the amended and
restated certificate of incorporation of CPI or the amended and
restated bylaws of CPI to the directors, officers, employees,
fiduciaries or other agents of CPI. The merger agreement further
requires that, for six years following the effective time of the
merger, subject to certain exceptions, Comtech and the surviving
corporation indemnify each present and former director, officer,
employee, fiduciary and agent of CPI and its subsidiaries
against losses arising out of their capacity as such. Finally,
subject to certain limitations, the surviving corporation will
maintain coverage under CPIs existing directors and
officers liability insurance policies with a scope and in
an amount not less favorable than coverage existing as of the
date of the merger agreement, provided that the surviving
corporation may not be required to pay more than 200% of the
annual premiums of such insurance policies as of the date of the
merger agreement.
Employee
Matters
Immediately following the closing, Comtech will provide
continuing CPI employees with benefits pursuant to currently
existing CPI benefit plans or the benefits plans of Comtech and
its subsidiaries.
Comtech will provide, and will use its reasonable best efforts
to cause its third-party insurers to provide, full credit to
CPIs continuing employees for their service to CPI as of
the closing date in determining eligibility to participate in,
and vesting with respect to any, employee benefit
plan, as defined in Section 3(3) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act (but not for purposes of benefit
accrual under any defined benefit pension plans, special or
early retirement programs, window separation programs, or
similar plans which may be in effect from time to time).
Comtech will generally use its reasonable best efforts
(i) to provide continuing employees of CPI with welfare
benefit plans having pre-existing condition limitations,
exclusions, actively-at-work requirements and waiting periods no
less favorable than those maintained by CPI and (ii) to the
extent such continuing employees participate in any health
benefit plan of Comtech or its subsidiaries, to cause such
health benefit plan to recognize the dollar amount of all
co-payments, deductibles and similar expenses incurred by such
continuing employees (and his or her eligible dependents) during
such calendar year.
Comtech and CPI agreed that nothing in the merger agreement will
be treated as an amendment to any employee benefit plan,
prohibit Comtech from amending or terminating any employee
benefit plan, limit the ability to terminate the employment or
service of any individual or confer any rights on any person
other than the parties to the merger agreement.
Notwithstanding any provision of the merger agreement, Comtech
may negotiate and enter into employment agreements, effective as
of the closing, with certain executive officers of CPI.
Termination
of Certain Arrangements
CPI has agreed not to commence any new offer periods under its
employee stock purchase plan after the date of the merger
agreement. CPI will terminate the employee stock purchase plan
as of the closing date.
Conduct
of Comtechs Business
Comtech has agreed that, until the effective time of the merger,
except (i) with CPIs prior written approval (which
may not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed),
(ii) as otherwise expressly contemplated or permitted by
the merger agreement or (iii) for transactions between or
among Comtech and its subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
Comtech will not, and will not permit any of its subsidiaries
to, take or omit to take any action that would reasonably be
expected to, individually or in the aggregate, result in any of
the conditions to the merger set forth in the merger agreement
not being satisfied or satisfaction of those conditions being
delayed; and
|
|
|
|
Comtech will not adopt or propose to adopt any amendments to its
restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated
by-laws which would reasonably be expected to prevent or delay
the consummation of
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
the merger or disproportionately adversely affect a holder of
shares of CPI common stock relative to a holder of Comtech
common stock.
|
Conditions
to the Completion of the Merger
Mutual
Closing Conditions
The obligation of each of Comtech, CPI and Merger Sub to
complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction, at or prior
to the effective time of the merger, of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of CPI common stock in accordance with
applicable law and the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation of CPI and the amended and restated bylaws of CPI;
|
|
|
|
absence of any law, injunction or other order of a court or
governmental entity of competent jurisdiction preventing
completion of the merger;
|
|
|
|
(i) expiration or termination of any applicable waiting
period (or extensions thereof) relating to the merger under the
HSR Act and (ii) all consents required under any other
applicable competition law are obtained or any applicable
waiting periods relating to the merger have expired or been
terminated;
|
|
|
|
approval for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of the
shares of Comtech common stock to be issued in the merger,
subject to official notice of issuance; and
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of, and the absence of any stop order (or
proceedings for that purpose) with respect to, the registration
statement on
Form S-4
of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part.
|
Additional
Closing Conditions for CPIs Benefit
The obligation of CPI to complete the merger is subject to the
satisfaction, at or prior to the effective time, of the
following additional conditions (any of which may be waived by
CPI, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the effective
time):
|
|
|
|
|
the accuracy in all material respects as of the date of the
merger agreement and as of the effective time of the merger (or,
in the case of representations and warranties that by their
terms address matters only as of another specified time, as of
that time) of certain representations and warranties made in the
merger agreement by Comtech regarding, among other matters,
Comtechs capital structure and Comtechs corporate
authority relative to the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of all other representations and warranties made in
the merger agreement by Comtech (disregarding any materiality or
material adverse effect qualifications contained in such
representations and warranties) as of the effective time of the
merger (or, in the case of representations and warranties that
by their terms address matters only as of another specified
time, as of that time), except for any such inaccuracies that
have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on
Comtech;
|
|
|
|
performance and compliance in all material respects by Comtech
of the obligations required to be performed by it or complied
with at or prior to the effective time of the merger;
|
|
|
|
absence of a material adverse effect on Comtech since the date
of the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
except as previously disclosed to CPI, the absence of any
pending litigation or proceeding of any kind which would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on
Comtech.
|
90
Additional
Closing Conditions for Comtechs and Merger Subs
Benefit
The obligation of Comtech and Merger Sub to complete the merger
is subject to the satisfaction, at or prior to the effective
time, of the following additional conditions (any of which may
be waived by Comtech and Merger Sub, in whole or in part, at any
time prior to the effective time):
|
|
|
|
|
the accuracy in all material respects as of the date of the
merger agreement and as of the effective time of the merger (or,
in the case of representations and warranties that by their
terms address matters only as of another specified time, as of
that time) of certain representations and warranties made in the
merger agreement by CPI regarding, among other matters,
CPIs capital structure, CPIs corporate authority
relative to the merger agreement, conformity of the merger with
the organizational documents of CPI and its subsidiaries, lack
of a material adverse effect with respect to CPI and receipt by
CPI of fairness opinions from each of J.P. Morgan and
Moelis;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of all other representations and warranties made in
the merger agreement by CPI (disregarding any materiality or
material adverse effect qualifications contained in such
representations and warranties) as of the effective time of the
merger (or, in the case of representations and warranties that
by their terms address matters only as of another specified
time, as of that time), except for any such inaccuracies that
have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on
CPI;
|
|
|
|
performance and compliance in all material respects by CPI of
the obligations required to be performed by it or complied with
at or prior to the effective time of the merger;
|
|
|
|
absence of a material adverse effect on CPI since the date of
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
except as previously disclosed to Comtech, the absence of any
pending litigation or proceeding of any kind which would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on CPI;
and
|
|
|
|
absence of any pending action or proceeding of any kind by any
governmental entity that (i) challenges or seeks to make
illegal, delay materially or otherwise directly or indirectly
prohibit the completion of the merger, (ii) seeks to
prohibit Comtechs or Merger Subs ability to exercise
effectively full rights of ownership of CPIs common stock
following the completion of the merger or (iii) seeks to
compel Comtech, CPI or any of their respective subsidiaries to
take any burdensome action described under
Covenants and Agreements Efforts
to Complete Transactions beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
Termination
by Mutual Consent
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time before the
completion of the merger by mutual written consent of Comtech
and CPI.
Termination
by Either Comtech or CPI
The merger agreement may also be terminated prior to the
completion of the merger by either Comtech or CPI if:
|
|
|
|
|
a court or other government entity has issued an order enjoining
or has otherwise prohibited the merger and such injunction or
prohibition has become final and non-appealable;
|
|
|
|
CPI stockholder approval is not received at the duly called and
held special meeting of CPI stockholders; or
|
|
|
|
the closing has not occurred on or before December 1, 2010;
provided that either Comtech or CPI may extend such date by
45 days, subject to certain limitations, if the closing has
not occurred because of the failure to obtain a required
approval from one or more regulatory authorities.
|
91
Termination
by Comtech
The merger agreement may also be terminated prior to the
completion of the merger by Comtech (provided that Comtech is
not then in breach of any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements, such that Comtech could not satisfy the
applicable conditions to the closing related to its
representations, warranties and obligations under the merger
agreement) if:
|
|
|
|
|
CPI has breached or failed to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements, such that
CPI could not satisfy the applicable conditions to the closing
related to its representations, warranties, covenants, and
obligations, and such breach or failure to perform is incapable
of being cured by December 1, 2010 (or valid extension of
such date) or has not been cured within 30 days of written
notice from Comtech;
|
|
|
|
the CPI board of directors changes its recommendation in favor
of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner adverse to
Comtech in connection with a superior acquisition proposal (see
Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus); or
|
|
|
|
the CPI board of directors changes its recommendation in favor
of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner adverse to
Comtech in response to a material event, development,
circumstance, occurrence or change in circumstances or facts not
related to a competing acquisition proposal that was not known
to CPIs board of directors on the date of the merger
agreement (or if known, the magnitude or material consequences
of which were not known or understood as of that date) (see
Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus).
|
Termination
by CPI
The merger agreement may also be terminated prior to the
completion of the merger by CPI (provided that CPI is not then
in breach of any of its representations, warranties, covenants
or agreements, such that CPI could not satisfy the applicable
conditions to the closing related to its representations,
warranties and obligations under the merger agreement):
|
|
|
|
|
if Comtech has breached or failed to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements, such that
Comtech could not satisfy the applicable conditions to the
closing related to its representations, warranties, covenants,
and obligations, and such breach or failure to perform is
incapable of being cured by December 1, 2010 (or valid
extension of such date) or has not been cured within
30 days of written notice from CPI; or
|
|
|
|
in order to enter into a superior acquisition proposal subject
to its obligations to pay Comtech a termination fee (see
Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus).
|
Termination
Fee and Liquidated Damages Payable by CPI
CPI has agreed to pay a termination fee of $12 million to
Comtech if the merger agreement is terminated under any of the
following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Comtech terminates the merger agreement because the CPI board of
directors changes its recommendation in favor of the adoption of
the merger agreement in a manner adverse to Comtech in
connection with a superior acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
CPI terminates the merger agreement in order to enter into a
superior acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
the CPI board of directors changes its recommendation in favor
of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner adverse to
Comtech, and Comtech or CPI terminates the merger agreement
because CPI stockholder approval is not received at the duly
called and held special meeting of CPI stockholders;
|
|
|
|
(i) an acquisition proposal is made for CPI; (ii) the
CPI board of directors does not change its recommendation in
favor of the adoption of the merger agreement in a manner
adverse to Comtech; (iii) Comtech or CPI terminates the
merger agreement because CPI stockholder approval is not
received at the duly called and
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
held special meeting of CPI stockholders; and (iv) within
12 months, CPI enters into a definitive agreement or
consummates an alternative transaction; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) an acquisition proposal is made for CPI;
(ii) Comtech or CPI terminates the merger agreement because
(a) a court or other government entity has issued an order
enjoining or has otherwise prohibited the merger and such
injunction or prohibition has become final and non-appealable or
(b) the closing has not occurred on or before
December 1, 2010 (or as otherwise validly extended); and
(iii) within 12 months, CPI enters into a definitive
agreement or consummates an alternative transaction.
|
In addition, CPI has agreed to pay liquidated damages of
$15 million to Comtech if Comtech terminates the merger
agreement because the CPI board of directors or a committee
thereof changes its recommendation in favor of the adoption of
the merger agreement in a manner adverse to Comtech in response
to a material event, development, circumstance, occurrence or
change in circumstances or facts not related to a competing
acquisition proposal that was not known to CPIs board of
directors or a committee thereof on the date of the merger
agreement (or if known, the magnitude or material consequences
of which were not known or understood as of that date).
If the merger agreement is terminated and pursuant to the terms
of the merger agreement, Comtech is entitled to receive a
termination fee or liquidated damages, the receipt of the
termination fee or liquidated damages, as applicable, will be
Comtechs exclusive remedy, and Comtech will not be
entitled to any further or other rights, claims or remedies at
law or in equity, all of which further or other rights, claims
and remedies Comtech has irrevocably waived in the merger
agreement.
For the purposes of the merger agreement, alternative
transaction means a transaction of a type described in the
definition of acquisition proposal under
Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus except that the
references to 15% in such definition of acquisition
proposal are deemed to be references to 50%.
Payment
of Expenses; Specific Performance; Modification or Amendment;
and Waiver of Conditions
Payment
of Expenses
Other than as described above under
Termination of the Merger
Agreement Termination Fee Payable by CPI the
merger agreement provides that each party will pay its own fees
and expenses in connection with the merger agreement.
Specific
Performance
The parties to the merger agreement are entitled to injunctions
to prevent breaches of the merger agreement and to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions of the merger agreement in
addition to any and all other remedies at law or in equity.
Modification
or Amendment
The parties to the merger agreement may modify or amend the
merger agreement by written agreement executed and delivered by
their duly authorized officers, provided that, after approval of
the merger agreement by CPI stockholders, no amendment may be
made which by law requires further approval by CPI stockholders,
without the approval of such stockholders.
Waiver
Comtech or CPI may waive, in whole or in part, compliance with
any of the conditions to its obligation to consummate the merger
to the extent permitted by law.
93
THE
VOTING AND STANDSTILL AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms and conditions
of the voting and standstill agreement. This summary may not
contain all the information about the voting and standstill
agreement that is important to you. This summary is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the voting and standstill
agreement, which is attached as Annex B to, and
incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus.
You are encouraged to read the voting and standstill agreement
in its entirety.
Concurrently with the execution and delivery of the merger
agreement, on May 8, 2010, Cypress Merchant Banking
Partners II L.P., Cypress Merchant B II C.V. and
55th Street Partners II L.P., which are referred to as
the Cypress Group stockholders in this proxy
statement/prospectus, entered into a voting and standstill
agreement with Comtech. As of
[l],
2010, the Cypress Group stockholders collectively held
[l] shares
of CPI common stock, or approximately
[l]%
of the outstanding.
Agreement
to Vote
The voting and standstill agreement obligates the Cypress Group
stockholders to vote 49.9% of the outstanding shares of CPI
common stock at any meeting of CPI stockholders (or any
adjournment or postponement thereof) as follows (provided, that
the Cypress Group stockholders remain free to vote any shares of
CPI common stock which they own in excess of 49.9% of the
outstanding shares in any manner they deem appropriate):
|
|
|
|
|
in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement,
the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
against any action, proposal, transaction or agreement that
would reasonably be expected to result in a breach of a
covenant, representation or warranty in the merger agreement or
the voting and standstill agreement; and
|
|
|
|
against any alternative acquisition proposal, any change in the
members of the CPI board of directors, any material change in
the capitalization of CPI or an amendment to its amended and
restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated
bylaws, any material change in CPIs corporate structure or
business or any other action or proposal reasonably expected to
prevent, impede, interfere with, delay, postpone or adversely
affect the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
|
However, if the CPI board of directors makes a board
recommendation change (see The Merger
Agreement Covenants and Agreements No
Solicitation of Transactions by CPI beginning on page
[l]
of this proxy statement/prospectus) related to a superior
acquisition proposal, the Cypress Group stockholders will only
be required to vote 25% of the outstanding shares of CPI common
stock in the manner described in the paragraph above. In such
case, each Cypress Group stockholders remaining shares may
be voted in a manner deemed appropriate by such Cypress Group
stockholder in its sole discretion. In addition, if the CPI
board of directors makes a board recommendation change for any
reason other than in connection with a superior acquisition
proposal and the
five-day
average closing price of Comtech common stock immediately prior
to the change of recommendation is less than $24.00, the Cypress
Group stockholders will again only be required to vote 25% of
the outstanding shares of CPI common stock in the manner
described in the paragraph above. As above, each Cypress Group
stockholders remaining shares may be voted in a manner
deemed appropriate by such Cypress Group stockholder in its sole
discretion.
Transfer
and Other Restrictions
In addition, the Cypress Group stockholders have agreed to
certain restrictions on the transfer of the shares of CPI common
stock owned by them until the earlier of the effective time of
the merger or the termination of the merger agreement. During
this period, the Cypress Group stockholders may not, among other
things, (i) sell, transfer, tender, pledge, encumber or
assign or otherwise dispose of their shares of CPI common stock,
(ii) solicit any proxies for the voting of CPI common stock
(other than to recommend that stockholders vote in favor of the
merger and the merger agreement), (iii) make any public
announcement with respect to, or submit a proposal for, or offer
of any extraordinary transaction involving CPI, or
(iv) take any actions which could reasonably be expected to
prevent, impede, interfere with or adversely affect the
completion of the merger.
94
For a period of two years following the completion of the
merger, the Cypress Group stockholders have agreed to not, among
other things, (i) sell, transfer, tender, pledge, encumber
or assign or otherwise dispose of their shares of Comtech common
stock received in the merger other than as contemplated by the
voting and standstill agreement (as described below),
(ii) acquire any additional shares of Comtech common stock,
(iii) solicit any proxies for the voting of Comtech common
stock, or (iv) make any public announcement with respect
to, or submit a proposal for, or offer any extraordinary
transaction involving Comtech.
The Cypress Group stockholders have agreed not to transfer or
sell any shares of Comtech common stock for six months following
the completion of the merger. Following such six-month period,
the Cypress Group stockholders will be permitted to sell the
shares of Comtech common stock they hold to certain permitted
transferees in one or more block trades or through a
broker-dealer on a national securities exchange, provided that
with respect to trades through a broker-dealer, during any
three-month period, the Cypress Group stockholders are limited
to selling the greater of 2.5% of the total outstanding shares
of Comtech or an amount equal to the average weekly trading
volume for the four weeks prior to the proposed sale. With
respect to block trades, the Cypress Group stockholders are
prohibited from selling shares of Comtech common stock to any
person that (i) would, to the actual knowledge of the
Cypress Group stockholder (without any duty of inquiry with
respect to an exchange transaction other than review of filings
on the web site of the Securities and Exchange Commission), own
more than 5% of the number of outstanding Comtech common stock
following such sale, (ii) has submitted a stockholder
proposal to Comtech, (iii) solicited proxies to vote shares
of Comtech common stock, or (iv) has made a public
announcement regarding any extraordinary transaction involving
Comtech. Following the six-month period referred to above, the
Cypress Group stockholders are permitted to tender their shares
in a tender offer for Comtechs common stock after
providing Comtech with a right of first refusal on such shares
at the tender offer price (payable in cash).
No
Solicitation
The Cypress Group stockholders have also agreed not to knowingly
(subject to certain exceptions) solicit or initiate any
acquisition proposal for CPI, participate in any discussions or
negotiations regarding any acquisition proposals for CPI, or
enter into any agreement with respect to an acquisition proposal
for CPI, or an agreement requiring such Cypress Group
stockholder to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the
merger.
Termination
The voting and standstill agreement terminates upon the earliest
of (i) the mutual agreement of the stockholders and
Comtech, (ii) the termination of the merger agreement or
(iii) the second anniversary of the merger.
95
INTERESTS
OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger
In considering the recommendation of the CPI board of directors
that stockholders adopt the merger agreement, stockholders
should be aware that CPIs directors and executive officers
have financial interests in the merger, in addition to their
interests as stockholders of CPI entitled to receive the merger
consideration (set forth below), that may be different from, or
in addition to, the interests of CPI stockholders generally. The
CPI board of directors was aware of these interests, and
considered these interests, among other matters, in evaluating
and negotiating the merger agreement and in recommending to CPI
stockholders that the merger agreement be adopted.
CPI
Non-Employee Directors
CPI
Common Stock Ownership
CPIs non-employee directors hold shares of CPI common
stock that are not subject to any vesting restrictions or other
restrictions, and, if they still hold such shares at the
effective time of the merger, will receive the merger
consideration for such shares upon completion of the merger.
The following table sets forth the number of shares of CPI
common stock (excluding shares of restricted stock that remain
subject to vesting restrictions) held by CPIs non-employee
directors as of June 4, 2010.
Non-Employee
Director CPI Common Stock Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
of CPI Common Stock
|
|
|
Held as of
|
|
|
June 4, 2010(1)
|
|
Michael Targoff
|
|
|
74,528
|
|
Michael F. Finley
|
|
|
31,716
|
|
Stephen R. Larson
|
|
|
7,153
|
|
Jeffrey P. Hughes(2)
|
|
|
8,264
|
|
William P. Rutledge
|
|
|
14,008
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes shares subject to continuing vesting restrictions under
applicable incentive plans. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes shares held directly by Mr. Hughes. Does not
include shares owned by the Cypress Group stockholders as to
which Mr. Hughes may be deemed to have beneficial ownership. |
CPI
Option and Restricted Stock Treatment
As part of their overall compensation for services on the CPI
board of directors, each of CPIs non-employee directors
has received certain equity grants in the form of options to
purchase CPI common stock
and/or
grants of shares of CPI restricted common stock.
The merger agreement provides that each stock option granted to
CPIs non-employee directors under CPIs equity
compensation plans and outstanding immediately prior to
completion of the merger will be cancelled upon completion of
the merger and exchanged for an amount, in cash, equal to the
excess, if any, of (i) the sum of (A) $9.00 and
(B) the cash value of the per share closing prices of
Comtech common stock for the 10 consecutive trading days
immediately preceding the date that is two days before closing
of the merger, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market,
multiplied by the conversion ratio, reduced by (ii) the
per-share exercise price of such option.
The following table sets forth the number of outstanding
unvested and vested in-the-money stock options, including the
weighted average exercise price for each, to acquire CPI common
stock held by CPIs non-employee directors as of
June 4, 2010, and the estimated cash consideration that
each of them will receive upon cancellation of such options upon
completion of the merger. The actual cash amount payable upon
completion of the merger may vary, depending on the trading
value of Comtech common stock prior to completion of the merger.
The table is
96
based upon the assumption of a trailing 10-trading day average
for the closing trading price of Comtech common stock of $30.00
per share on the date that is two days prior to completion of
the merger (resulting in aggregate cash merger consideration of
$16.15 per share of CPI common stock subject to each option).
Cash
Consideration to be Received by Non-Employee Directors upon
Vesting and Cancellation of All Outstanding CPI Stock Options at
Closing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares
|
|
Exercise
|
|
No. of Shares
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Price
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
of Unvested
|
|
Vested
|
|
of Vested
|
|
|
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
Total Estimated
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Resulting Cash-Out
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Payment ($)(1)
|
|
Michael Targoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,157
|
|
|
|
4.32
|
|
|
|
289,938
|
|
Michael F. Finley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen R. Larson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey P. Hughes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William P. Rutledge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Actual cash payment received will depend upon the trailing
10-day
average closing trading price of Comtech common stock for the
period ending two days before completion of the merger. |
The merger agreement provides that each restricted stock award
that was granted to CPIs non-employee directors under
CPIs equity compensation plans and that is outstanding
immediately prior to the closing will be canceled at the closing
in exchange for a payment, in cash, equal to the sum of
(A) $9.00 and (B) the trailing
10-day
average closing trading price of Comtech common stock for the
period ending two days before completion of the merger, as
reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, multiplied by the
conversion ratio.
The following table sets forth the number of CPI restricted
shares held by CPIs non-employee directors as of
June 4, 2010, and the estimated cash consideration that
each of them will receive upon cancellation of such shares upon
completion of the merger. The actual cash amount payable upon
completion of the merger may vary, depending on the trading
value of Comtech common stock prior to completion of the merger.
The table is based upon the assumption of a trailing 10-trading
day average for the closing trading price of Comtech common
stock of $30.00 per share on the date that is two days prior to
completion of the merger (resulting in an aggregate cash merger
consideration of $16.15 per share of restricted stock).
Cash
Consideration to be Received by Non-Employee Directors upon
Vesting and Cash-Out of all Outstanding CPI Restricted
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
|
|
CPI
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Total Estimated Resulting
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
Cashout Payment ($)(1)
|
|
Michael Targoff
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
|
|
58,804
|
|
Michael F. Finley
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
51,909
|
|
Stephen R. Larson
|
|
|
9,646
|
|
|
|
155,744
|
|
Jeffrey P. Hughes
|
|
|
9,646
|
|
|
|
155,744
|
|
William P. Rutledge
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
|
|
58,804
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Actual cash payment received will depend upon the trailing
10-day
average closing trading price of Comtech common stock for the
period ending two days before completion of the merger. |
97
Fees
Paid to Members of the Special Committee of CPIs board of
directors
The board of directors of CPI established a special committee
consisting of Mr. Finley, Mr. Rutledge and
Mr. Targoff for the purpose of reviewing, evaluating and,
as appropriate, negotiating or participating in negotiations
with respect to Comtechs expression of interest and
alternatives thereto. Mr. Finley was appointed as the
chairman of the committee. As compensation for their service as
members of the special committee, each of the members of the
committee received a one-time fee of $10,000 ($15,000 for the
chairman). In addition, each member of the special committee is
entitled to receive $1,500 for each meeting of the special
committee attended having a duration of not less than 30 minutes
but less than three hours and $3,000 for each meeting of the
special committee attended having a duration of three hours or
more.
The following table sets forth the aggregate amount of cash fees
that CPI expects to pay to each member of the special committee
in respect of their service through the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus.
Aggregate
Cash Fees Paid or Payable to Members of CPIs Special
Committee
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Total Fees Payable ($)
|
|
Michael Targoff
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
Michael F. Finley
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
William P. Rutledge
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Interests
of Mr. Hughes arising out of his affiliation with Cypress
Associates
Mr. Hughes is a managing member of Cypress Associates. CPI
has agreed to reimburse Cypress Associates for certain legal
fees and other expenses incurred and to be incurred by Cypress
Associates in connection with the negotiation and execution of
the voting and standstill agreement with Comtech and other items
relating to the Merger. The aggregate amount of such fees is not
expected to exceed
$[l].
CPI
Executive Officers
The executive officers of CPI are expected to continue in
employment with the surviving company or its subsidiaries in
their current capacities immediately following the merger,
unless they voluntarily terminate their employment or are
terminated by Comtech. Comtech is presently in negotiations with
CPIs executive officers regarding the terms of their
continued employment and treatment of their equity awards, and,
if no such agreement is reached, some or all of the executive
officers might not continue with the surviving company or its
subsidiaries in their current capacity or otherwise.
Severance
Arrangements
Each of CPIs executive officers has entered into
agreements with CPI that provide for certain severance benefits
upon a qualifying termination of such executives
employment. For certain of the executive officers, these
benefits are enhanced for qualifying terminations following a
change-of-control event, which includes the merger. For
comparative purposes, the following describes the benefits that
would be provided to the officers in the case of a qualifying
termination of employment, both prior to and following a
change-of-control event.
Messrs. Caldarelli,
Fickett and Littman
If the employment of any of these executive officers is
terminated by the employer without cause or by the executive
officer for good reason (each as defined in the applicable
agreement) before the occurrence of a change-of-control event,
then the executive officer will be entitled to receive severance
payments equal to a multiple of the sum of the executive
officers base salary and the average value of bonuses
under CPIs management incentive plan and other performance
bonuses received by the executive officer for the three fiscal
years preceding the termination date. The applicable multiples
for Messrs. Caldarelli, Fickett and Littman are 2.0, 1.5
and 1.5, respectively. If the qualifying termination occurs more
than six months after the beginning of a fiscal year, then the
executive officer will be eligible to receive a prorated bonus
for the year of termination. Messrs. Caldarelli, Fickett
and Littman will
98
also be eligible to continue receiving certain benefits for
24 months, 18 months and 18 months, respectively,
following termination.
In the case of a termination of any of these executive officers
by the employer without cause or by the executive officer for
good reason within the two-year period following a
change-of-control event, the severance payments will be equal to
a specified multiple of the sum of the executive officers
base salary an