e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended January 29, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from_______________ to ________________
Commission File No. 1-7819
Analog Devices, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
04-2348234
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One Technology Way, Norwood, MA
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
02062-9106
(Zip Code) |
(781) 329-4700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on it
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer
and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
As of January 29, 2011 there were 299,610,446 shares of common stock of the registrant, $0.16
2/3 par value per share, outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
728,504 |
|
|
|
$ |
602,983 |
|
Cost of sales (1) |
|
|
246,331 |
|
|
|
|
234,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
482,173 |
|
|
|
|
368,476 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development (1) |
|
|
122,745 |
|
|
|
|
114,398 |
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative (1) |
|
|
100,022 |
|
|
|
|
88,481 |
|
Special charge |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
16,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,767 |
|
|
|
|
219,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income from continuing operations |
|
|
259,406 |
|
|
|
|
149,114 |
|
Nonoperating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(2,285 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,180 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
258,820 |
|
|
|
|
148,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
43,214 |
|
|
|
|
28,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
|
215,606 |
|
|
|
|
119,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
222,106 |
|
|
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings per share basic |
|
|
299,218 |
|
|
|
|
295,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings per share diluted |
|
|
308,848 |
|
|
|
|
304,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
|
$0.72 |
|
|
|
|
$0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
$0.74 |
|
|
|
|
$0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
|
$0.70 |
|
|
|
|
$0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
$0.72 |
|
|
|
|
$0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid per share |
|
|
$0.22 |
|
|
|
|
$0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes stock-based compensation
expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
$ 1,748 |
|
|
|
|
$ 1,671 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
$ 5,585 |
|
|
|
|
$ 5,359 |
|
Selling, marketing, general and
administrative |
|
|
$ 5,270 |
|
|
|
|
$ 4,805 |
|
See accompanying notes.
1
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,570,321 |
|
|
$ |
1,070,000 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,390,795 |
|
|
|
1,617,768 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
384,276 |
|
|
|
387,169 |
|
Inventory (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
|
25,419 |
|
|
|
22,008 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
170,950 |
|
|
|
171,390 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
86,611 |
|
|
|
84,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,980 |
|
|
|
277,478 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
69,275 |
|
|
|
74,710 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
39,382 |
|
|
|
51,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,737,029 |
|
|
|
3,478,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
|
404,164 |
|
|
|
401,277 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
1,599,754 |
|
|
|
1,578,493 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
55,290 |
|
|
|
56,449 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
64,223 |
|
|
|
65,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,123,431 |
|
|
|
2,101,545 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,654,890 |
|
|
|
1,628,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
468,541 |
|
|
|
472,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan investments |
|
|
24,836 |
|
|
|
8,690 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
256,243 |
|
|
|
255,580 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
54,582 |
|
|
|
52,765 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
51,470 |
|
|
|
57,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
391,335 |
|
|
|
377,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,596,905 |
|
|
$ |
4,328,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes $2,447 and $2,534 related to stock-based compensation at January 29, 2011 and October
30, 2010, respectively.
See accompanying notes.
2
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
125,876 |
|
|
$ |
133,111 |
|
Deferred income on shipments to distributors, net |
|
|
253,254 |
|
|
|
242,848 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
73,304 |
|
|
|
60,421 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
14,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
141,557 |
|
|
|
207,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
608,491 |
|
|
|
643,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
523,046 |
|
|
|
400,635 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
Deferred compensation plan liability |
|
|
24,852 |
|
|
|
8,690 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
74,492 |
|
|
|
74,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
623,987 |
|
|
|
485,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 471,934 shares authorized,
none outstanding |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock, $0.16 2/3 par value, 1,200,000,000 shares
authorized, 299,610,446 shares issued and outstanding
(298,652,994 on October 30, 2010) |
|
|
49,936 |
|
|
|
49,777 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
297,126 |
|
|
|
286,969 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,052,862 |
|
|
|
2,896,566 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(35,497 |
) |
|
|
(33,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
3,364,427 |
|
|
|
3,199,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,596,905 |
|
|
$ |
4,328,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
222,106 |
|
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
29,493 |
|
|
|
29,281 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
12,603 |
|
|
|
11,835 |
|
Gain on sale of business |
|
|
(6,500 |
) |
|
|
(859 |
) |
Excess tax benefit-stock options |
|
|
(3,607 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,305 |
) |
|
|
5,597 |
|
Non-cash portion of special charge |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
487 |
|
Other non-cash activity |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(35,594 |
) |
|
|
45,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(5,355 |
) |
|
|
93,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
216,751 |
|
|
|
213,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(664,148 |
) |
|
|
(739,309 |
) |
Maturities of short-term available-for-sale investments |
|
|
651,887 |
|
|
|
625,921 |
|
Sales of short-term available-for-sale investments |
|
|
239,419 |
|
|
|
24,977 |
|
Proceeds related to sale of businesses |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
63,036 |
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(25,547 |
) |
|
|
(17,179 |
) |
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(3,475 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
|
208,136 |
|
|
|
(42,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Dividend payments to shareholders |
|
|
(65,810 |
) |
|
|
(58,870 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(113,605 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net proceeds from employee stock plans |
|
|
101,967 |
|
|
|
163,487 |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Excess tax benefit-stock options |
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
75,735 |
|
|
|
104,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
500,321 |
|
|
|
274,539 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,070,000 |
|
|
|
639,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,570,321 |
|
|
$ |
914,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 29, 2011
(all tabular amounts in thousands except per share amounts and percentages)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the information furnished in the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements reflects all normal recurring adjustments that are necessary to
fairly state the results for these interim periods and should be read in conjunction with the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2010 and related notes.
The results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending October 29, 2011 or any
future period.
The Company sold its baseband chipset business and related support operations (Baseband
Chipset Business) to MediaTek Inc. and sold its CPU voltage regulation and PC thermal monitoring
business to certain subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation during the first quarter of fiscal
2008. The Company has reflected the financial results of these businesses as discontinued
operations in the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented.
Certain amounts reported in previous years have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal
2011 presentation. Such reclassified amounts were immaterial. The Company has a 52-53 week fiscal
year that ends on the Saturday closest to the last day in October. Fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 are
52-week fiscal years.
Note 2 Revenue Recognition
Revenue from product sales to customers is generally recognized when title passes, which for
shipments to certain foreign countries is subsequent to product shipment. Title for these shipments
ordinarily passes within a week of shipment. A reserve for sales returns and allowances for
customers is recorded based on historical experience or specific identification of an event
necessitating a reserve.
In all regions of the world, the Company defers revenue and the related cost of sales on
shipments to distributors until the distributors resell the products to their customers. Therefore,
the Companys revenue fully reflects end customer purchases and is not impacted by distributor
inventory levels. Sales to distributors are made under agreements that allow distributors to
receive price adjustment credits, as discussed below, and to return qualifying products for credit,
as determined by the Company, in order to reduce the amounts of slow-moving, discontinued or
obsolete product from their inventory. These agreements limit such returns to a certain percentage
of the value of the Companys shipments to that distributor during the prior quarter. In addition,
distributors are allowed to return unsold products if the Company terminates the relationship with
the distributor.
Distributors are granted price-adjustment credits related to many of their sales to their
customers. Price adjustment credits are granted when the distributors standard cost (i.e., the
Companys sales price to the distributor) does not provide the distributor with an appropriate
margin on its sales to its customers. As distributors negotiate selling prices with their
customers, the final sales price agreed to with the customer will be influenced by many factors,
including the particular product being sold, the quantity ordered, the particular customer, the
geographic location of the distributor and the competitive landscape. As a result, the distributor
may request and receive a price adjustment credit from the Company to allow the distributor to earn
an appropriate margin on the transaction.
Distributors are also granted price adjustment credits in the event of a price decrease
subsequent to the date the product was shipped and billed to the distributor. Generally, the
Company will provide a credit equal to the difference between the price paid by the distributor
(less any prior credits on such products) and the new price for the product multiplied by the
quantity of such product in the distributors inventory at the time of the price decrease.
Given the uncertainties associated with the levels of price adjustment credits to be granted
to distributors, the sales price to the distributor is not fixed or determinable until the
distributor resells the products to their customers. Therefore, the Company defers revenue
recognition from sales to distributors until the distributors have sold the products to their
customers.
Title to the inventory transfers to the distributor at the time of shipment or delivery to the
distributor, and payment from the distributor is due in accordance with the Companys standard
payment terms. These payment terms are not contingent upon the distributors sale of the products
to their customers. Upon title transfer to distributors, inventory is reduced for the cost of
5
goods shipped, the margin (sales less cost of sales) is recorded as deferred income on
shipments to distributors, net and an account receivable is recorded.
The deferred costs of sales to distributors have historically had very little risk of
impairment due to the margins the Company earns on sales of its products and the relatively long
life-cycle of the Companys products. Product returns from distributors that are ultimately
scrapped have historically been immaterial. In addition, price protection and price adjustment
credits granted to distributors historically have not exceeded the margins the Company earns on
sales of its products. The Company continuously monitors the level and nature of product returns
and is in continuous contact with the distributors to ensure reserves are established for all known
material issues.
As
of January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, the Company had
gross deferred revenue of $336.3
million and $327.2 million, respectively, and gross deferred
cost of sales of $83.0 million and
$84.4 million, respectively. Deferred income on shipments to
distributors increased by approximately $10.5
million in the first three months of fiscal 2011 primarily, as a result of the Companys shipments
to its distributors in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 exceeding the distributors sales to their
customers during this same time period.
Shipping costs are charged to cost of sales as incurred.
The Company generally offers a 12-month warranty for its products. The Companys warranty
policy provides for replacement of the defective product. Specific accruals are recorded for known
product warranty issues. Product warranty expenses during either of the three-month periods ended
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 were not material.
Note 3 Stock-Based Compensation
Grant-Date Fair Value The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate
the grant-date fair value of stock option awards. The grant-date fair value of restricted stock
units represents the fair value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant, reduced by the
present value of dividends expected to be paid on the Companys common stock prior to vesting.
Information pertaining to the Companys stock option awards and the related estimated
weighted-average assumptions used to calculate the fair value of stock options granted during the
three-month periods ended January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Options granted (in thousands) |
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price per share |
|
|
$37.53 |
|
|
|
$31.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share |
|
|
$8.64 |
|
|
|
$7.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected volatility |
|
|
29.36% |
|
|
|
31.43% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected term (in years) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.1% |
|
|
|
2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected dividend yield |
|
|
2.3% |
|
|
|
2.5% |
|
Expected volatility The Company is responsible for estimating volatility and has considered
a number of factors, including third-party estimates, when estimating volatility. The Company
currently believes that the exclusive use of implied volatility results in the best estimate of the
grant-date fair value of employee stock options because it reflects the markets current
expectations of future volatility. In evaluating the appropriateness of exclusively relying on
implied volatility, the Company concluded that: (1) options in the Companys common stock are
actively traded with sufficient volume on several exchanges; (2) the market prices of both the
traded options and the underlying shares are measured at a similar point in time to each other and
on a date close to the grant date of the employee share options; (3) the traded options have
exercise prices that are both near-the-money and close to the exercise price of the employee share
options; and (4) the remaining maturities of the traded options used to estimate volatility are at least one
year.
Expected term The Company uses historical employee exercise and option expiration data to
estimate the expected term assumption for the Black-Scholes grant-date valuation. The Company
believes that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of a new
option, and that generally its employees exhibit similar exercise behavior.
Risk-free interest rate The yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that
is commensurate with the expected term assumption is used as the risk-free interest rate.
6
Expected dividend yield Expected dividend yield is calculated by annualizing the cash
dividend declared by the Companys Board of Directors for the current quarter and dividing that
result by the closing stock price on the date of grant. Until such time as the Companys Board of
Directors declares a cash dividend for an amount that is different from the current quarters cash
dividend, the current dividend will be used in deriving this assumption. Cash dividends are not
paid on options, restricted stock or restricted stock units.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the
value of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of
grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. The term forfeitures is distinct from cancellations or expirations and represents
only the unvested portion of the surrendered stock-based award. Based on an analysis of its
historical forfeitures, the Company has applied an annual forfeiture rate of 4.3% to all unvested
stock-based awards as of January 29, 2011. The rate of 4.3% represents the portion that is expected
to be forfeited each year over the vesting period. This analysis will be re-evaluated quarterly and
the forfeiture rate will be adjusted as necessary. Ultimately, the actual expense recognized over
the vesting period will only be for those options that vest.
Stock-Based Compensation Activity
A summary of the activity under the Companys stock option plans as of January 29, 2011 and
changes during the three- month period then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Activity during the Three Months Ended January 29, 2011 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Price Per Share |
|
|
Term in Years |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at October 30, 2010 |
|
|
43,079 |
|
|
$29.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
$37.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(4,020) |
|
|
$25.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(62) |
|
|
$27.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired |
|
|
(1,996) |
|
|
$44.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at January 29, 2011 |
|
|
38,874 |
|
|
$29.96 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
$343,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at January 29, 2011 |
|
|
22,054 |
|
|
$31.32 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
$172,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested or expected to vest at
January 29, 2011 (1) |
|
|
37,733 |
|
|
$29.99 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
$332,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to the vested options, the Company expects a portion of the unvested
options to vest at some point in the future. Options expected to vest is calculated by
applying an estimated forfeiture rate to the unvested options. |
During the three months ended January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, the total intrinsic value
of options exercised (i.e., the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid
by the employee to exercise the options) was $46.7 million and $13.2 million, respectively, and the
total amount of proceeds received by the Company from exercise of these options was $102.0 million and $187.6
million, respectively. Proceeds from stock option exercises pursuant to employee stock plans in the
Companys statement of cash flows during the three months ended January 29, 2011 and January 30,
2010 of $102.0 million and $163.5 million, respectively, are net of the value of shares surrendered
by employees in certain limited circumstances to satisfy the exercise price of options, and to
satisfy employee tax obligations upon vesting of restricted stock units and in connection with the
exercise of stock options granted to the Companys employees under the Companys equity
compensation plans. The withholding amount is based on the Companys minimum statutory withholding
requirement. The total grant-date fair value of stock options that vested during the three months
ended January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, was approximately $25.3 million and $31.4 million,
respectively.
7
A summary of the Companys restricted stock unit award activity as of January 29, 2011 and
changes during the three- month period then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Stock Units |
|
|
Average Grant |
|
Activity during the Three Months Ended January 29, 2011 |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units outstanding at October 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
$28.21 |
|
Units granted |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
$34.92 |
|
Restrictions lapsed |
|
|
(11) |
|
|
|
$29.96 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5) |
|
|
|
$31.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units outstanding at January 29, 2011 |
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
$30.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 29, 2011, there was $128.1 million (before tax consideration) of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards, including stock options,
restricted stock and restricted stock units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
Note 4 Comprehensive Income
Components of comprehensive income include net income and certain transactions that have
generally been reported in the consolidated statement of shareholders equity and consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
|
$ 215,606 |
|
|
$ |
119,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized holding gains (net of taxes of $23 and
$5, respectively) on securities classified as short-term investments |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) (net of taxes of $40
and $9, respectively) on securities classified as other investments |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized losses (net of taxes of $401 and $1,056,
respectively) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges |
|
|
(3,023 |
) |
|
|
(7,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Transition asset |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Net actuarial gain |
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,902 |
) |
|
|
(4,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from continuing operations |
|
|
213,704 |
|
|
|
115,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
$220,204 |
|
|
$ |
115,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at January 29, 2011 and October 30,
2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
$ (1,412 |
) |
|
|
$ (1,391 |
) |
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments |
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
6,133 |
|
Pension plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
Net actuarial loss |
|
|
(37,934 |
) |
|
|
(38,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
$ (35,497 |
) |
|
|
$ (33,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate fair value of investments with unrealized losses as of January 29, 2011 and
October 30, 2010 was $634.9 million and $731.0 million, respectively. These unrealized losses are
primarily related to commercial paper that earns lower interest rates than current market rates.
None of these investments have been in a loss position for more than twelve months.
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities classified as short-term
investments at January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities classified as short-term investments |
|
|
$ 168 |
|
|
|
$ 165 |
|
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities classified as short-term investments |
|
|
(35) |
|
|
|
(217) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities classified as short-term investments |
|
|
$ 133 |
|
|
|
$ (52) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed based only on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of
potential future issuances of common stock relating to stock option programs and other potentially
dilutive securities using the treasury stock method. In calculating diluted earnings per share, the
dilutive effect of stock options is computed using the average market price for the respective
period. In addition, the assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method include the average
unrecognized compensation expense of stock options that are in-the-money and restricted stock units. This results in the
assumed buyback of additional shares, thereby reducing the dilutive impact of stock options.
Potential shares related to certain of the Companys outstanding stock options were excluded
because they were anti-dilutive. Those potential shares, determined based on the weighted average
exercise prices during the respective years, related to the Companys outstanding stock options
could be dilutive in the future.
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
215,606 |
|
|
$ |
119,600 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
222,106 |
|
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
299,218 |
|
|
|
295,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
299,218 |
|
|
|
295,469 |
|
Assumed exercise of common stock equivalents |
|
|
9,630 |
|
|
|
9,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares |
|
|
308,848 |
|
|
|
304,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents related to outstanding stock options |
|
|
8,097 |
|
|
|
19,159 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The sum of the individual per share amounts may not equal the total due to rounding. |
10
Note 6 Special Charges
A summary of the Companys special charges and accruals related to ongoing actions is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of |
|
|
|
|
Closure of Wafer |
|
|
|
|
|
Wafer |
|
|
|
|
Fabrication |
|
Reduction of |
Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
Operating |
Facility |
|
Total Special |
Income Statement |
in Sunnyvale |
|
Costs |
in Cambridge |
|
Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,627 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2008 Charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,627 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,583 |
|
|
|
7,446 |
|
|
|
34,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility closure costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
14,629 |
|
|
|
15,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2009 Charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,333 |
|
|
$ |
22,132 |
|
|
$ |
52,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility closure costs |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,689 |
|
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2010 Charges |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
11,419 |
|
|
$ |
4,689 |
|
|
$ |
16,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wafer |
|
|
|
|
Reduction of |
Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
Operating |
Facility |
Total Special |
Balance Sheet |
Costs |
in Cambridge |
Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
5,546 |
|
|
$ |
1,963 |
|
|
$ |
7,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance payments |
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
(1,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility closure costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency on accrual |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 29, 2011 |
|
$ |
4,236 |
|
|
$ |
946 |
|
|
$ |
5,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of Wafer Fabrication Facility in Sunnyvale
The Company ceased production at its California wafer fabrication facility in November 2006.
The Company paid the related lease obligation costs on a monthly basis over the remaining lease
term, which expired in March 2010. We recorded a one-time settlement charge of $0.4 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 related to the termination of the lease. This action was completed
during fiscal 2010.
Reduction of Operating Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, in order to further reduce its operating cost
structure, the Company recorded a special charge of $1.6 million for severance and fringe benefit
costs in accordance with its ongoing benefit plan or statutory requirements at foreign
locations for 19 engineering, and selling, marketing, general and administrative (SMG&A) employees.
During fiscal 2009, the Company recorded an additional charge of $30.3 million related to this
cost reduction action. Approximately $2.1 million of this charge was for lease obligation costs for
facilities that the Company ceased using during the first quarter of fiscal 2009; approximately
$0.8 million was for the write-off of property, plant and equipment no longer used as a result of
this action; and approximately $0.5 million was for contract termination costs and approximately
$0.3 million was for clean-up and closure costs that were expensed as incurred. The remaining $26.6
million related to the severance and fringe benefit costs recorded in accordance with the Companys
ongoing benefit plan or statutory requirements at foreign locations for 245 manufacturing employees
and 302 engineering and SMG&A employees.
11
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded an additional charge of $11.4
million related to the further reduction of its operating cost structure. Approximately $10.9
million of this charge was for severance and fringe benefit costs recorded in accordance with the
Companys ongoing benefit plan or statutory requirements at foreign locations for 149 engineering
and SMG&A employees. Approximately $0.5 million of the charge relates to the Companys decision to
abandon efforts to develop a particular expertise in power management, resulting in the impairment
of related intellectual property.
The Company terminated the employment of all employees associated with this action and is
paying amounts owed to them as income continuance.
Closure of a Wafer Fabrication Facility in Cambridge
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company recorded a special charge of $22.1
million as a result of its decision to consolidate its Cambridge, Massachusetts wafer fabrication
facility into its existing Wilmington, Massachusetts facility. In connection with the anticipated
closure of this facility, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the facilitys manufacturing
assets and concluded that there was an impairment of approximately $12.9 million based on the
revised period of intended use. The remaining $9.2 million was for severance and fringe benefit
costs recorded in accordance with the Companys ongoing benefit plan for 175 manufacturing
employees and 9 SMG&A employees associated with this action.
The Company finished production in the Cambridge wafer fabrication facility and began clean-up
activities during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the
Company reversed approximately $1.8 million of its severance accrual. The accrual reversal was
required because 51 employees either voluntarily left the Company or found alternative employment
within the Company. In addition, the Company recorded a special charge of approximately $1.7
million for the impairment of manufacturing assets that were originally going to be moved to the
Companys other wafer fabrication facilities but were no longer needed at those facilities and
therefore had no future use. The Company also recorded a special charge of $0.1 million for
clean-up costs as the Company began its cleanup of the Cambridge wafer fabrication facility at the
end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company terminated the employment of all employees
associated with this charge and is paying amounts owed to them as income
continuance.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded an additional charge of $4.7
million related to this cost reduction action. Approximately $3.4 million of the charge related to
lease obligation costs for the Cambridge wafer fabrication facility, which the Company ceased using
in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The remaining $1.3 million of the charge related to clean-up
and closure costs that were expensed as incurred.
Note 7 Segment Information
The Company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment based on the aggregation
of five operating segments. The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range
of integrated circuits. The Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the Chief Operating
Decision Maker.
Revenue Trends by End Market
The categorization of revenue by end market is determined using a variety of data points
including the technical characteristics of the product, the sold to customer information, the
ship to customer information and the end customer product or application into which the Companys
product will be incorporated. As data systems for capturing and tracking this data evolve and
improve, the categorization of products by end market can vary over time. When this occurs, the
Company reclassifies revenue by end market for prior periods. Such reclassifications typically do
not materially change the sizing of, or the underlying trends of results within, each end market.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
Industrial |
|
$ |
336,799 |
|
|
|
46% |
|
|
|
28% |
|
|
$ |
262,786 |
|
|
|
44% |
|
Automotive |
|
|
94,685 |
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
72,826 |
|
|
|
12% |
|
Consumer |
|
|
120,940 |
|
|
|
17% |
|
|
|
-1% |
|
|
|
121,590 |
|
|
|
20% |
|
Communications |
|
|
163,478 |
|
|
|
22% |
|
|
|
22% |
|
|
|
133,471 |
|
|
|
22% |
|
Computer |
|
|
12,602 |
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
12,310 |
|
|
|
2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
728,504 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
$ |
602,983 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Trends by Product Type
|
The following table summarizes revenue by product categories. The categorization of the
Companys products into broad categories is based on the characteristics of the individual
products, the specification of the products and in some cases the specific uses that certain
products have within applications. The categorization of products into categories is therefore
subject to judgment in some cases and can vary over time. In instances where products move between
product categories, the Company reclassifies the amounts in the product categories for all prior
periods. Such reclassifications typically do not materially change the sizing of, or the underlying
trends of results within, each product category. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
Revenue* |
|
Converters |
|
$ |
329,791 |
|
|
|
45% |
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
$ |
291,174 |
|
|
|
48% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amplifiers / Radio frequency |
|
|
195,635 |
|
|
|
27% |
|
|
|
33% |
|
|
|
147,591 |
|
|
|
24% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other analog |
|
|
93,757 |
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
29% |
|
|
|
72,494 |
|
|
|
12% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal analog signal processing |
|
|
619,183 |
|
|
|
85% |
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
511,259 |
|
|
|
85% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power management & reference |
|
|
53,357 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
36% |
|
|
|
39,197 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total analog products |
|
$ |
672,540 |
|
|
|
92% |
|
|
|
22% |
|
|
$ |
550,456 |
|
|
|
91% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital signal processing |
|
|
55,964 |
|
|
|
8% |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
52,527 |
|
|
|
9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
728,504 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
$ |
602,983 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The sum of the individual percentages does not equal the total due to rounding.
Revenue Trends by Geographic Region
Revenue by geographic region, based upon customer location, for the three-month periods ended
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Region |
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
130,397 |
|
|
$ |
116,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of North and South America |
|
|
41,893 |
|
|
|
29,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
191,289 |
|
|
|
142,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
|
|
104,167 |
|
|
|
110,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
|
|
148,121 |
|
|
|
106,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of Asia |
|
|
112,637 |
|
|
|
97,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
728,504 |
|
|
$ |
602,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
In the three-month period ended January 29, 2011, the predominant countries comprising Rest
of North and South America are Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising Europe
are Germany, Sweden, France and the United Kingdom; and the predominant countries comprising Rest
of Asia are Taiwan and South Korea.
In the three-month period ended January 30, 2010, the predominant countries comprising Rest
of North and South America are Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising Europe
are Germany, Sweden, France and Holland; and the predominant countries comprising Rest of Asia
are Taiwan and South Korea.
Note 8 Fair Value
The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The Company applies the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to
measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the
lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement. The
hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level
3 measurements).
Level 1 Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has
a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term
of the asset or liability.
Level 3 Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability in which there is
little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. As of January
29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 the Company held no assets or liabilities valued using Level 3
inputs.
14
The table below sets forth by level the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were
accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010. The
table excludes cash on hand and assets and liabilities that are measured at historical cost or any
basis other than fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Fair Value measurement at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value measurement at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Date using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Date using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional money market funds |
|
$ |
1,126,866 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,126,866 |
|
|
$ |
921,034 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
921,034 |
|
Corporate obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
419,666 |
|
|
|
419,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,959 |
|
|
|
99,959 |
|
Short term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with one year or less to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate obligations (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,343,208 |
|
|
|
1,343,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,520,220 |
|
|
|
1,520,220 |
|
Floating rate notes, issued at par |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Securities with greater than one year to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate notes (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,587 |
|
|
|
17,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,548 |
|
|
|
17,548 |
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,256 |
|
|
|
7,256 |
|
Deferred compensation investments |
|
|
24,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,836 |
|
|
|
8,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,690 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,633 |
|
|
|
18,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,801 |
|
|
|
26,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
1,153,131 |
|
|
$ |
1,803,584 |
|
|
$ |
2,956,715 |
|
|
$ |
931,041 |
|
|
$ |
1,721,784 |
|
|
$ |
2,652,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$375 million aggregate principle debt (3) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
392,546 |
|
|
$ |
392,546 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
400,635 |
|
|
$ |
400,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
392,546 |
|
|
$ |
392,546 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
400,635 |
|
|
$ |
400,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amortized cost of the Companys investments classified as
available-for-sale as of January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was
$1,361.8 million and $1,639.1 million, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company has a master netting arrangement by counterparty with
respect to derivative contracts. As of January 29, 2011 and October
30, 2010, contracts in a liability position of $0.6 million and $0.8
million, respectively were netted against contracts in an asset
position in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(3) |
|
Equal to the accreted notional value of the debt plus the
mark-to-market of the interest rate component of the long-term debt to
fair value. The fair value of the long-term debt as of January 29,
2011 and October 30, 2010 was $404.1 million and $416.3 million,
respectively. |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value
disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash equivalents and short-term investments These investments are adjusted to fair value
based on quoted market prices or are determined using a yield curve model based on current market
rates.
Deferred compensation plan investments and other investments The fair value of these mutual
fund, money market fund and equity investments are based on quoted market prices.
Long-term debt The fair value of long-term debt is based on quotes received from third
party banks.
Interest rate swap agreements The fair value of interest rate swap agreements is based on
quotes received from third party banks. These values represent the estimated amount the Company
would receive or pay to terminate the agreements taking into consideration current interest rates
as well as the creditworthiness of the counterparty.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts The estimated fair value of forward foreign
currency exchange contracts, which includes derivatives that are accounted for as cash flow hedges
and those that are not designated as cash flow hedges, is
15
based on the estimated amount the Company would receive if it sold these agreements at
the reporting date taking into consideration current interest rates as well as the creditworthiness
of the counterparty for assets and the Companys creditworthiness for liabilities.
Financial
Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Company accounts for its equity investments in privately held companies under the cost method. These
investments are subject to periodic impairment review and measured and recorded at fair value when they are
deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The aggregate carrying value of the Companys investments in
privately held companies was approximately $1.9 million and was classified in other investments on the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 29, 2011. The Company did not have any investments in
privately held companies as of October 30, 2010.
Note
9 Derivatives
Foreign Exchange Exposure Management The Company enters into forward foreign currency
exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Such exposures result from the portion of the Companys
operations, assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar,
primarily the Euro; other exposures include the Philippine Peso and the British Pound. These
foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal
course of business, and accordingly, are not speculative in nature. The contracts are for periods
consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions, generally one year or less. Hedges
related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the
respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly. Derivative
instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be
confidently identified and quantified. As the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction
are matched at inception, forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in
fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction, with
the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (OCI) in shareholders equity and reclassified into
earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any residual
change in fair value of the instruments, or ineffectiveness, is recognized immediately in other
(income) expense. Additionally, the Company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that
economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the re-measurement of certain recorded assets
and liabilities in a non-functional currency. Changes in the fair value of these undesignated
hedges are recognized in other (income) expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair
value of the asset or liability being hedged. As of January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, the
total notional amount of these undesignated hedges was $46.1 million and $42.1 million,
respectively. The fair value of these hedging instruments in the Companys condensed consolidated
balance sheets as of January 29, 2011 was $0.7 million. As
of October 30, 2010, the amount was
immaterial.
Interest Rate Exposure Management On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into interest rate
swap transactions related to its outstanding 5.0% senior unsecured notes where the Company swapped
the notional amount of its $375 million of fixed rate debt at 5.0% into floating interest rate debt
through July 1, 2014. Under the terms of the swaps, the Company will (i) receive on the $375
million notional amount a 5.0% annual interest payment that is paid in two installments on the 1st
of every January and July, commencing January 1, 2010 through and ending on the maturity date; and
(ii) pay on the $375 million notional amount an annual three-month LIBOR plus 2.05% (2.35% as of
January 29, 2011) interest payment, payable in four installments on the 1st of every January,
April, July and October, commencing on October 1, 2009 and ending on the maturity date. The
LIBOR-based rate is set quarterly three months prior to the date of the interest payment. The
Company designated these swaps as fair value hedges. The fair value of the swaps at inception was
zero and subsequent changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps were reflected in the
carrying value of the interest rate swaps on the balance sheet. The carrying value of the debt on
the balance sheet was adjusted by an equal and offsetting amount.
The gain or loss on the hedged
item (that is, the fixed-rate borrowings) attributable to the hedged benchmark interest rate risk and
the offsetting gain or loss on the related interest rate swaps for the three-month periods ended
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Classification |
|
Loss on Swaps |
|
Gain on Note |
|
Net Income Effect |
|
Gain on Swaps |
|
Loss on Note |
|
Net Income Effect |
Other income |
|
$ |
(8,168 |
) |
|
$ |
8,168 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,720 |
|
|
$ |
(1,720 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
The amounts earned and owed under the swap agreements are accrued each period and are
reported in interest expense. There was no ineffectiveness recognized in any of the periods
presented.
The market risk associated with the Companys derivative instruments results from currency
exchange rate or interest rate movements that are expected to offset the market risk of the
underlying transactions, assets and liabilities being hedged. The counterparties to the agreements
relating to the Companys derivative instruments consist of a number of major international
financial institutions with high credit ratings. The Company does not believe that there is
significant risk of nonperformance by these counterparties because the Company continually monitors
the credit ratings of such counterparties. Furthermore, none of the Companys derivative
transactions are subject to collateral or other security arrangements and none contain provisions
that are dependent on the Companys credit ratings from any credit rating agency. While the
contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume
of these transactions, they do not represent the amount of the Companys exposure to credit risk.
The amounts potentially subject to credit risk (arising from the possible inability of
16
counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts) are generally limited to the amounts, if any,
by which the counterparties
obligations under the contracts exceed the obligations of the Company to the counterparties.
As a result of the above considerations, the Company does not consider the risk of counterparty
default to be significant.
The Company records the fair value of its derivative financial instruments in the consolidated
financial statements in other current assets, other assets or accrued liabilities, depending on
their net position, regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the derivative contract.
Changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments are either recognized
periodically in earnings or in shareholders equity as a component of OCI. Changes in the fair
value of cash flow hedges are recorded in OCI and reclassified into earnings when the underlying
contract matures. Changes in the fair values of derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting are
reported in earnings as they occur.
The total notional amount of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments as of
January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010 was as follows: $375 million of interest rate swap agreements
accounted for as fair value hedges, and $143.8 million and $128 million, respectively, of cash flow
hedges denominated in Euros, British Pounds and Philippine Pesos. The fair value of these hedging
instruments in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets as of January 29, 2011 and
October 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
October 30, 2010 |
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$ |
18,633 |
|
|
$ |
26,801 |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and
other current assets
|
|
$ |
3,789 |
|
|
$ |
7,542 |
|
The effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the condensed
consolidated statements of income for the three-month periods ended January 29, 2011 and January
30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Loss
recognized in OCI on derivatives (net of tax of $346 in 2011 and $695 in 2010) |
|
$ |
(2,611 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,608 |
) |
Gain reclassified from OCI into income (net of tax of $55 in 2011 and $361 in 2010) |
|
$ |
(412 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,397 |
) |
The amounts reclassified into earnings before tax are recognized in cost of sales and
operating expenses for the three-month periods ended January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
1,393 |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
All derivative gains and losses included in OCI will be reclassified into earnings within the
next 12 months. There was no ineffectiveness in the three-month
periods ended January 29, 2011 or
January 30, 2010.
Note 10 Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The Company annually evaluates goodwill for impairment as well as whenever events or changes
in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company
tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an
operating segment) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter (on or about August 1)
or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. For our latest annual impairment assessment
which occurred on August 1, 2010, the Company identified its reporting units to be its five
operating segments, which
meet the aggregation criteria for one reportable segment. The
performance of the test involves a two-step process. The first step of the impairment test involves
comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values,
including goodwill. The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units using the income
approach methodology of valuation that includes the discounted cash flow method as well as other
generally accepted valuation methodologies. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the
reporting units fair value, the Company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test
to determine the amount of impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test
involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting units goodwill with the
carrying value of that goodwill. No impairment of
goodwill resulted in any of the fiscal years presented. The Companys next annual
17
impairment
assessment will be made on the first day of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 unless indicators arise that would
require the Company
to reevaluate at an earlier date.
The following table presents the changes in goodwill during
the first three months of fiscal 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
255,580 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
256,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
The Company reviews identified intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying value to future undiscounted cash flows
the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which
the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market
price, if any, or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique.
Intangible assets, which will continue to be amortized, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology-based |
|
$ |
6,146 |
|
|
$ |
5,575 |
|
|
$ |
7,166 |
|
|
$ |
6,323 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,949 |
|
|
$ |
8,028 |
|
|
$ |
10,024 |
|
|
$ |
8,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or
on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of
economic use. The remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period
of approximately 0.6 years.
Amortization expense was $0.4 million and $1.8 million for the three-month periods ended
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, respectively.
The Company expects amortization expense for these intangible assets to be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
Amortization |
|
|
Year |
|
Expense |
|
|
Remainder of 2011 |
|
$ |
921 |
|
18
Note 11 Pension Plans
The Company has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain
non-U.S. employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices. The
Companys funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local
requirements of each country. The plans assets consist primarily of U.S. and non-U.S. equity
securities, bonds, property and cash.
Net periodic pension cost of non-U.S. plans is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2,224 |
|
|
$ |
1,507 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2,645 |
) |
|
|
(2,849 |
) |
Amortization of initial net obligation (asset) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Amortization of net loss (gain) |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
2,729 |
|
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension contributions of $3.5 million were made by the Company during the three months ended
January 29, 2011. The Company presently anticipates contributing an additional $5.5 million to
fund its defined benefit pension plans in fiscal year 2011 for a total of $9.0 million.
Note 12 Revolving Credit Facility
As of January 29, 2011, the Company had $2,961.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments, of which $922.4 million was held in the United States. The balance of the
Companys cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments was held outside the United States
in various foreign subsidiaries. As the Company intends to reinvest certain of its foreign earnings
indefinitely, this cash is not available to meet certain of the Companys cash requirements in the
United States, including for cash dividends and common stock repurchases. The Company entered into
a five-year, $165 million unsecured revolving credit facility with certain institutional lenders in
May 2008. To date, the Company has not borrowed under this credit facility but the Company may
borrow in the future and use the proceeds for support of commercial paper issuance, stock
repurchases, dividend payments, acquisitions, capital expenditures, working capital and other
lawful corporate purposes. Any advances under this credit agreement will accrue interest at rates
that are equal to LIBOR plus a margin that is based on the Companys leverage ratio. The terms of
this facility also include financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a minimum
interest coverage ratio and not exceed a maximum leverage ratio. As of January 29, 2011, the
Company was compliant with these covenants. The terms of the facility also impose restrictions on
the Companys ability to undertake certain transactions, to create certain liens on assets and to
incur certain subsidiary indebtedness.
19
Note 13 Debt
On June 30, 2009, the Company issued $375 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% senior
unsecured notes due July 1, 2014 (the Notes) with semi-annual fixed interest payments on January 1
and July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2010. The sale of the Notes was made pursuant to the
terms of an underwriting agreement dated June 25, 2009 between the Company and Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, as representative of the several underwriters named therein. The net proceeds
of the offering were $370.4 million, after issuing at a discount and deducting expenses,
underwriting discounts and commissions, which will be amortized over the term of the Notes. The
indenture governing the Notes contains covenants that may limit the Companys ability to: incur,
create, assume or guarantee any debt for borrowed money secured by a lien upon a principal
property; enter into sale and lease-back transactions with respect to a principal property; and
consolidate with or merge into, or transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets to, any
other party.
On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into interest rate swap transactions where the Company
swapped the notional amount of its $375 million of fixed rate debt at 5.0% into floating interest
rate debt through July 1, 2014. Under the terms of the swaps, the Company will (i) receive on the
$375 million notional amount a 5.0% annual interest payment that is paid in two installments on the
1st business day of every January and July, commencing January 1, 2010 through and ending on the
maturity date; and (ii) pay on the $375 million notional amount an annual three-month LIBOR plus
2.05% (2.35% as of January 29, 2011) interest payment, payable in four installments on the 1st
business day of every January, April, July and October, commencing on October 1, 2009 and ending on
the maturity date. The LIBOR- based rate is set quarterly three months prior to the date of the
interest payment. The Company designated these swaps as fair value hedges. The changes in the fair
value of the interest rate swaps were reflected in the carrying value of the interest rate swaps in
other assets on the balance sheet. The carrying value of the debt on the balance sheet was adjusted
by an equal and offsetting amount.
On December 22, 2010, Analog Devices Holdings B.V. a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into
a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., London Branch as administrative agent. The borrowers
obligations are guaranteed by the Company. The credit agreement provides for a term loan facility of $145 million,
which matures on December 22, 2013. The terms of the agreement provide for a three-year principle amortization schedule with $3.6 million payable quarterly every March, June, September and December with the balance payable
upon the maturity date. The loan will bear interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the annual LIBOR
rate applicable to that interest period plus 1.25% (1.55% as of January 29, 2011). The terms of this facility include
limitations on subsidiary indebtedness and on liens against the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, and also
include financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and not exceed
a maximum leverage ratio. As of January 29, 2011, the Company was compliant with these covenants. As of
January 29, 2011, $14.5 million of this debt was classified as short-term.
Note 14 Common Stock Repurchase
The Companys common stock repurchase program has been in place since August 2004. In the
aggregate, the Board of Directors has authorized the Company to repurchase $5 billion of the
Companys common stock under the program. Under the program, the Company may repurchase outstanding
shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated
transactions. Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Companys Board of Directors, the
repurchase program will expire when the Company has repurchased all shares authorized under the
program. As of January 29, 2011, the Company had repurchased a total of approximately 119.1 million
shares of its common stock for approximately $4,061.8 million under this program. An additional
$938.2 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program. The
repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock. Any future common
stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors including the amount of cash available to
the Company in the United States, and the Companys financial performance, outlook and liquidity.
The Company also from time to time repurchases shares in settlement of employee tax withholding
obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units, or in certain limited circumstances to
satisfy the exercise price of options granted to the Companys employees under the Companys equity
compensation plans.
Note 15 Discontinued Operations
In November 2007, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with certain
subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation to sell the Companys CPU voltage regulation and PC
thermal monitoring business which consisted of core voltage regulator products for the central
processing unit in computing and gaming applications and temperature sensors and fan-speed
controllers for managing the temperature of the central processing unit. In connection with the
purchase and sale agreement, $7.5 million was placed into escrow and was excluded from the gain
calculations. During the third quarter of fiscal 2008, additional proceeds were released from
escrow and an additional pre-tax gain of $6.6 million, or $3.8 million net of tax, was recorded as
a gain on sale of discontinued operations. Additionally, at the time of the sale, the Company
entered into a one-year manufacturing supply agreement with a subsidiary of ON Semiconductor
Corporation for an additional $37 million.
20
The Company has allocated the proceeds from this arrangement based on the fair value of the
two elements of this transaction: (i) the sale of a business and (ii) the obligation to manufacture
product for a one-year period. As a result, $85 million was recorded as a liability related to the
manufacturing supply agreement, all of which has been utilized. The liability was included in
current liabilities of discontinued operations on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. The
Company recorded the revenue associated with this manufacturing supply agreement in discontinued
operations. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, additional proceeds of $1 million were released
from escrow and $0.6 million net of tax was recorded as additional gain from the sale of
discontinued operations. The Company does not expect any additional proceeds from this sale.
In September 2007, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its Baseband
Chipset Business to MediaTek Inc. The decision to sell the Baseband Chipset Business was due to the
Companys decision to focus its resources in areas where its signal processing expertise can
provide unique capabilities and earn superior returns. The cash proceeds received were net of a
refundable withholding tax of $62 million. In connection with the purchase and sale agreement, $10
million was placed into escrow and was excluded from the gain calculations. The Company made
additional cash payments of $1.7 million during fiscal 2009 related to retention payments for
employees who transferred to MediaTek Inc. and for the reimbursement of intellectual property
license fees incurred by MediaTek Inc. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company received
cash proceeds of $62 million as a result of the refund of the withholding tax and also recorded an
additional gain on sale of $0.3 million, or $0.2 million net of tax, due to the settlement of
certain items at less than the amounts accrued. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, additional
proceeds of $10 million were released from escrow and $6.5 million net of tax was recorded as
additional gain from the sale of discontinued operations. The Company does not expect any
additional proceeds from this sale.
The following amounts related to the CPU voltage regulation and PC thermal monitoring and
Baseband Chipset Businesses have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as
discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
January 29, 2011 |
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16 Income Taxes
The Company has provided for potential liabilities due in the various jurisdictions in which
the Company operates. Judgment is required in determining the worldwide income tax expense
provision. In the ordinary course of global business, there are many transactions and calculations
where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Some of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of
cost reimbursement arrangements among related entities. Although the Company believes its estimates
are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be
different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such
differences could have a material impact on the Companys income tax provision and operating
results in the period in which such determination is made.
Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005 IRS Examination
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the IRS completed its field examination of the
Companys fiscal years 2004 and 2005. On January 2, 2008, the IRS issued its report for fiscal 2004
and 2005, which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years. The Company has
recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments. There are four items
with an additional potential total tax liability of $46 million. The Company has concluded, based
on discussions with its tax advisors, that these four items are not likely to result in any
additional tax liability. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any additional tax liability for
these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the
resolution of differences between the IRS and taxpayers. The Companys initial meetings with the
appellate division of the IRS were held during fiscal year 2009. Two of the unresolved matters are
one-time issues and pertain to Section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code related to the beneficial
tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under The American Jobs Creation Act. The
other matters pertain to the computation of research and development (R&D) tax credits and the
profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the United States. These latter two
matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent years.
21
Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007 IRS Examination
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the IRS completed its field examination of the
Companys fiscal years 2006 and 2007. The IRS and the Company have agreed on the treatment of a
number of issues that have been included in an Issue Resolutions Agreement related to the 2006 and
2007 tax returns. However, no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues,
including the same R&D credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal
2004 and 2005, the pricing of intercompany sales (transfer pricing) and the deductibility of
certain stock option compensation expenses. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the IRS issued
its report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007, which included proposed adjustments related to these
two fiscal years. The Company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed
adjustments. There are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $195 million.
The Company concluded, based on discussions with its tax advisors, that these four items are not
likely to result in any additional tax liability. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any
additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the
normal processes for the resolution of differences between the IRS and taxpayers. The Companys
initial meetings with the appellate division of the IRS were held during fiscal year 2010. With the
exception of the proposed adjustment related to the deductibility of certain stock option expenses,
the other three matters could impact taxes payable for fiscal 2006 and 2007 as well as for
subsequent years.
Fiscal Years 2008 and 2009 IRS Examination
The IRS has not started their examination of fiscal year 2008 or fiscal year 2009.
Although the Company believes its estimates of income tax payable are reasonable, no assurance
can be given that the Company will prevail in the matters raised and that the outcome of one or all
of these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax
provisions and accruals. The Company believes such differences would not have a material impact on
the Companys financial condition but could have a material impact on the Companys income tax
provision, operating results and operating cash flows in the period in which such matters are
resolved as well as for subsequent years.
Note 17 New Accounting Pronouncements
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements
In
October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13 Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable
Revenue Arrangements (formerly EITF Issue No. 08-1). This standard modifies the revenue recognition guidance
for arrangements that involve the delivery of multiple elements, such as product, software, services or support, to a
customer at different times as part of a single revenue generating transaction. This standard provides principles and
application guidance to determine whether multiple deliverables exist, how the individual deliverables should be
separated and how to allocate the revenue in the arrangement among those separate deliverables. The standard also
expands the disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU No. 2009-13 is effective
for fiscal years that begin on or after June 15, 2010, which is the Companys fiscal year 2011. The adoption of ASU
2009-13 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial condition and
results of operations.
Business Combinations
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2010-29, Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805) Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma
Information for Business Combinations (ASU No. 2010-29). ASU No. 2010-29 requires a public entity
to disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that
occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the prior year. It also
requires a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring adjustments directly
attributable to the business combination included in the reported revenue and earnings. The new
disclosure will be effective for the Companys first quarter of fiscal year 2012. The adoption of
ASU No. 2010-29 will require additional disclosure in the event of a business combination but will
not have a material impact on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
Intangibles Goodwill and Other
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles- Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic
350). ASU 210-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or
negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of
the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In
determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should
consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist.
ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2010, which is the
Companys fiscal year 2012. The company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that ASU No.
2010-28 may have on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
Note 18 Subsequent Event
On February 14, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.22 per
outstanding share of common stock. The dividend will be paid on March 23, 2011 to all shareholders
of record at the close of business on March 4, 2011.
22
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements and related notes included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2010.
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
including in particular the section entitled Outlook, contains forward-looking statements
regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under
the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act). These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and
projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our
management. Words such as expects, anticipates, targets, goals, projects, intends,
plans, believes, seeks, estimates, continues, may, variations of such words and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements
that refer to projections regarding our future financial performance, particularly in light of the
uncertainty remaining after the recent global credit and financial market crisis; our anticipated
growth and trends in our businesses, our future capital needs and capital expenditures; our future
market position and expected competitive changes in the marketplace for our products; our ability
to innovate new products and technologies; the timing or the effectiveness of our efforts to
refocus our operations and reduce our cost structure and the expected amounts of any cost savings
related to those efforts; our ability to access credit or capital markets; our ability to pay
dividends or repurchase stock; our ability to service our outstanding debt; our expected tax rate;
the future actions of our third-party suppliers; the expected outcomes of intellectual property and
litigation matters; potential acquisitions or divestitures; the expected activities of our key
personnel; the effect of new accounting pronouncements and other characterizations of future events
or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking
statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are
difficult to predict, including those identified in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely
from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or
update any forward-looking statements except to the extent required by law.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we sold our baseband chipset business and related
support operations, or Baseband Chipset Business, to MediaTek Inc. and sold our CPU voltage
regulation and PC thermal monitoring business to certain subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor
Corporation. The financial results of these businesses are presented as discontinued operations in
the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented. Unless otherwise noted, this
Managements Discussion and Analysis relates only to financial results from continuing operations.
Results of Operations
(all tabular amounts in thousands except per share amounts and percentages)
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
728,504 |
|
|
$ |
602,983 |
|
Gross margin % |
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
Income from continuing operations,
net of tax |
|
$ |
215,606 |
|
|
$ |
119,600 |
|
Income from continuing operations,
net of tax,
as a % of revenue |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
Diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
The year-to-year revenue changes by end market and product category are more fully outlined
below under Revenue Trends by End Market and Revenue Trends by Product Type.
23
In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, our revenue increased 21% from the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 and our diluted earnings per share from continuing operations increased from $0.39 to
$0.70. Cash flow from operations in the first three months of fiscal 2011 was $216.8 million, or
30% of revenue. We received proceeds of $145.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2011
relating to a term loan facility we entered into through a wholly owned subsidiary in December 2010
and $102.0 million in net proceeds related to employee stock option exercises. In the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 we also repurchased a total of approximately 3.1 million shares of our
common stock for an aggregate of $113.6 million, distributed $65.8 million to our shareholders in
dividend payments and paid $25.5 million for capital expenditures. These factors contributed to the
net increase in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $273.3 million in the first
three months of fiscal 2011.
The year-to-year increase in revenue and profitability for the three months ended January 29,
2011 was primarily the result of the continued resurgence of economic activity and improving global
macro-economic conditions following the general economic downturn resulting from the global credit
and financial crisis. The strategy we employed over the past two years to focus on products and
markets that value innovation and to make fundamental improvements to our cost structure aided in
our growth and profitability. Improving macro-trends in the industrial, communications, automotive
and healthcare markets also helped, and we believe will continue to help, to generate strong growth
opportunities for us in the future. However, these trends remain uncertain and we cannot predict
the sustainability of the current economic conditions or how changes in the market or otherwise may
affect us in the future. Consequently, our reported results for the first quarter of fiscal 2011
may not be indicative of our future results.
Revenue Trends by End Market
The following table summarizes revenue by end market. The categorization of revenue by end
market is determined using a variety of data points including the technical characteristics of the
product, the sold to customer information, the ship to customer information and the end
customer product or application into which our product will be incorporated. As data systems for
capturing and tracking this data evolve and improve, the categorization of products by end market
can vary over time. When this occurs, we reclassify revenue by end market for prior periods. Such
reclassifications typically do not materially change the sizing of, or the underlying trends of
results within, each end market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
% of Revenue |
|
Industrial |
|
$ |
336,799 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
$ |
262,786 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
Automotive |
|
|
94,685 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
72,826 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
120,940 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
121,590 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Communications |
|
|
163,478 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
133,471 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Computer |
|
|
12,602 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
12,310 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
728,504 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
602,983 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial The year-to-year increase in revenue in the three-month period ended January 29,
2011 in industrial end market revenue was primarily the result of a broad-based increase in demand
in this end market, which was most significant for products sold into the instrumentation and
industrial automation sectors.
Automotive The year-to-year increase in revenue in the three-month period ended January 29,
2011 in automotive end market revenue was primarily the result of a general increase in the
electronic content found in vehicles and to a lesser extent inventory replenishment by our
customers.
Consumer The year-to-year decrease in revenue in the three-month period ended January 29,
2011 in consumer end market revenue was primarily the result of a decrease in demand for products
in the home entertainment sector, partially offset by an increase in demand for products used in
other consumer applications in this end market.
Communications The year-to-year increase in revenue in the three-month period ended January
29, 2011 in communications end market revenue was primarily the result of a broad-based increase in
demand in this end market, which was most significant for the base station and infrastructure end
market sectors.
24
Revenue Trends by Product Type
The following table summarizes revenue by product categories. The categorization of our
products into broad categories is based on the characteristics of the individual products, the
specification of the products and in some cases the specific uses that certain products have within
applications. The categorization of products into categories is therefore subject to judgment in
some cases and can vary over time. In instances where products move between product categories, we
reclassify the amounts in the product categories for all prior periods. Such reclassifications
typically do not materially change the sizing of, or the underlying trends of results within, each
product category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
% of Revenue |
|
|
Y/Y% |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
% of Revenue* |
|
Converters |
|
$ |
329,791 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
291,174 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
Amplifiers / Radio frequency |
|
|
195,635 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
147,591 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Other analog |
|
|
93,757 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
72,494 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal analog signal processing |
|
|
619,183 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
511,259 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
Power management & reference |
|
|
53,357 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
39,197 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total analog products |
|
$ |
672,540 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
$ |
550,456 |
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital signal processing |
|
|
55,964 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
52,527 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
728,504 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
602,983 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The sum of the individual percentages does not equal the total due to rounding. |
The year-to-year increase in total revenue in the three-month period ended January 29, 2011
was primarily the result of a broad based increase in sales across all
product categories.
Revenue Trends by Geographic Region
Revenue by geographic region, based upon customer location, for the three-month period ended
January 29, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
130,397 |
|
|
$ |
116,963 |
|
Rest of North and South America |
|
|
41,893 |
|
|
|
29,879 |
|
Europe |
|
|
191,289 |
|
|
|
142,066 |
|
Japan |
|
|
104,167 |
|
|
|
110,350 |
|
China |
|
|
148,121 |
|
|
|
106,522 |
|
Rest of Asia |
|
|
112,637 |
|
|
|
97,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
728,504 |
|
|
$ |
602,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the three-month period ended January 29, 2011, the predominant countries comprising Rest
of North and South America are Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising Europe
are Germany, Sweden, France and the United Kingdom; and the predominant countries comprising Rest
of Asia are Taiwan and South Korea.
In the three-month period ended January 30, 2010, the predominant countries comprising Rest
of North and South America are Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising Europe
are Germany, Sweden, France and Holland; and the predominant countries comprising Rest of Asia
are Taiwan and South Korea.
Sales increased in all geographic regions, except Japan, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011
as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010, with sales in Europe and China experiencing the
largest increases. The decrease in sales in Japan in the first
25
quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was primarily the result of
lower sales activity in the consumer end market sector in this region, partially offset by an
increase in industrial end market sales in this region.
Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Gross margin |
|
$ |
482,173 |
|
|
$ |
368,476 |
|
Gross margin % |
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
Gross margin percentage was higher by 510 basis points in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as
compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily as a result of an increase in sales of
$125.5 million, increased operating levels in our manufacturing facilities and the impact of
efforts to reduce overall manufacturing costs, including the savings realized as a result of wafer
fabrication consolidation actions.
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
R&D expenses |
|
$ |
122,745 |
|
|
$ |
114,398 |
|
R&D expenses as a % of revenue |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
Research and development, or R&D, expenses increased $8.3 million, or 7%, in the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase was primarily the
result of an increase in variable compensation expense, which is a variable expense linked to our
overall profitability and revenue growth, higher employee benefit costs and a general increase in
spending in response to improving business conditions over the past year.
R&D expenses as a percentage of revenue will fluctuate from year-to-year depending on the
amount of revenue and the success of new product development efforts, which we view as critical to
our future growth. At any point in time we have hundreds of R&D projects underway, and we believe
that none of these projects is material on an individual basis. We expect to continue the
development of innovative technologies and processes for new products, and we believe that a
continued commitment to R&D is essential in order to maintain product leadership with our existing
products and to provide innovative new product offerings, and therefore, we expect to continue to
make significant R&D investments in the future.
Selling, Marketing, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
SMG&A expenses |
|
$ |
100,022 |
|
|
$ |
88,481 |
|
SMG&A expenses as a % of revenue |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Selling, marketing, general and administrative, or SMG&A, expenses increased $11.5 million, or
13%, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The
increase was primarily the result of an increase in variable compensation expense, which is a
variable expense linked to our overall profitability and revenue growth, higher employee benefit
costs and a general increase in spending in response to improving business conditions over the past
year. To a lesser extent, the increase in SMG&A expenses was due to higher sales commission
expenses, which are variable expenses linked to our sales.
26
Special Charges
The following is a summary of the restructuring actions we have taken over the last several
years.
Closure of Wafer Fabrication Facility in Sunnyvale
We ceased production at our California wafer fabrication facility in November 2006. We paid
the related lease obligation costs on a monthly basis over the remaining lease term, which expired
in March 2010. We recorded one-time settlement charge of $0.4 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 related to the termination of the lease. This action was completed during fiscal 2010.
Reduction of Operating Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, in order to further reduce our operating cost
structure, we recorded a special charge of $1.6 million for severance and fringe benefit costs in
accordance with our ongoing benefit plan or the statutory requirements at foreign locations for 19
engineering, selling, marketing, general and administrative employees.
During fiscal 2009, we recorded an additional charge of $30.3 million related to this cost
reduction action. Approximately $2.1 million of this charge was for lease obligation costs for
facilities that we ceased using during the first quarter of fiscal 2009; approximately $0.8 million
was for the write-off of property, plant and equipment no longer used as a result of this action;
and approximately $0.5 million was for contract termination costs and approximately $0.3 million
was for clean-up and closure costs that we expensed as incurred. The remaining $26.6 million
related to the severance and fringe benefit costs recorded in accordance with our ongoing benefit
plan or statutory requirements at foreign locations for 245 manufacturing employees and 302
engineering and SMG&A employees. This cost reduction action, which was substantially completed
during the second quarter of fiscal 2009, resulted in annual savings of approximately $36.4
million. These annual savings are being realized as follows: approximately $31.6 million in SMG&A
expenses and approximately $4.8 million in cost of sales.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we recorded an additional charge of $11.4 million
related to the further reduction of our operating cost structure. Approximately $10.9 million of
this charge was for severance and fringe benefit costs recorded in accordance with our ongoing
benefit plan or statutory requirements at foreign locations for 149 engineering and SMG&A
employees. Approximately $0.5 million of the charge related to our decision to abandon efforts to
develop a particular expertise in power management, resulting in the impairment of related
intellectual property. These cost reductions actions, which were fully implemented in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011, resulted in annual savings of approximately $16 million.
We terminated the employment of all employees associated with this action and are paying
amounts owed to them as income continuance.
Closure of a Wafer Fabrication Facility in Cambridge
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded a special charge of $22.1 million as a
result of our decision to consolidate our Cambridge, Massachusetts wafer fabrication facility into
our existing Wilmington, Massachusetts facility. In connection with the anticipated closure of this
facility, we evaluated the recoverability of the facilitys manufacturing assets and concluded that
there was an impairment of approximately $12.9 million based on the revised period of intended use.
The remaining $9.2 million was for severance and fringe benefit costs recorded in accordance with
our ongoing benefit plan for 175 manufacturing employees and 9 SMG&A employees associated with this
action.
We finished production in the Cambridge wafer fabrication facility and began clean-up
activities during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 we
reversed approximately $1.8 million of our severance accrual. The accrual reversal was required
because 51 employees either voluntarily left Analog or found alternative employment within Analog.
In addition, we recorded a special charge of approximately $1.7 million for the impairment of
manufacturing assets that were originally going to be moved to our other wafer fabrication
facilities but were no longer needed at those facilities and therefore had no future use. We also
recorded a special charge of $0.1 million for clean-up costs as we began our clean-up of the
Cambridge wafer fabrication facility at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. We terminated
the employment of all employees associated with this charge and are paying amounts owed to them as
income continuance. We estimate that this action will result in annual cost savings of
approximately $41 million per year, which we began realizing in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
These annual savings are being realized as follows: approximately $40.2 million in cost of sales,
of which approximately $4.0 million relates to non-cash depreciation savings, and approximately
$0.8 million relates to SMG&A expenses.
27
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we recorded an additional charge of $4.7 million
related to this cost reduction action. Approximately $3.4 million of the charge related to lease
obligation costs for the Cambridge wafer fabrication facility, which we ceased using in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010, and the remaining $1.3 million of the charge related to clean-up and
closure costs. These cost reductions resulted in annual savings of approximately $2.4 million,
which we began realizing in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Operating Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
259,406 |
|
|
$ |
149,114 |
|
Operating income from continuing operations as
a % of
revenue |
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
The $110.3 million increase in operating income from continuing operations in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was primarily the result of
an increase in revenue of $125.5 million and a 510 basis point increase in gross margin percentage.
Nonoperating (Income) Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
2,830 |
|
|
$ |
2,538 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(2,285 |
) |
|
|
(2,180 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonoperating expense |
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating expense was lower by $0.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared
to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to a decrease in other nonoperating expense,
partially offset by an increase in interest expense incurred as a result of the term loan facility
we entered into though a wholly owned subsidiary in December 2010.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
43,214 |
|
|
$ |
28,667 |
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
Our effective tax rate reflects the applicable tax rate in effect in the various tax
jurisdictions around the world where our income is earned.
Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was lower by 260 basis points
compared to our effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The tax rate for the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 included the following items which caused a decrease in our tax rate:
the reinstatement of the federal R&D tax credit in December 2010 retroactive to January 1, 2010
resulting in a $6 million income tax savings, a $7 million reduction in the state tax credits
valuation reserve which we believe we can now recover and a $0.5 million tax benefit from the
increase in Irish deferred taxes as a result of the increase in the Irish manufacturing tax rate
from 10% to 12.5%. These items, which had the effect of decreasing the 2011 tax rate, were
partially offset by a change in the mix of our income in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 to
jurisdictions where income is taxed at a higher rate. In addition, the first quarter of fiscal
2010 included special charges, a majority of which provided a tax benefit at the higher U.S. tax
rate.
28
Income from Continuing Operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
215,606 |
|
|
$ |
119,600 |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax, as a % of
Revenue |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
Diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
Net income from continuing operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was higher than in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010 by approximately $96 million primarily as a result of the $110.3
million increase in operating income from continuing operations, offset by a higher provision for
income taxes in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 than in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
Diluted EPS from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
We sold our Baseband Chipset Business to MediaTek Inc. and our CPU voltage regulation and PC
thermal monitoring business to certain subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation during the
first quarter of fiscal 2008. Accordingly, we have presented the results of the operations of
these businesses as discontinued operations within our consolidated financial statements.
Outlook
The following statements are based on current expectations. These statements are
forward-looking and actual results may differ materially. Unless specifically mentioned, these
statements do not give effect to the potential impact of any mergers, acquisitions, divestitures,
or business combinations that may be announced or closed after the date of filing this report.
These statements supersede all prior statements regarding our business outlook made by us.
We expect revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to be in the range of $730 million to
$760 million. Our plan is for gross margin for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to be
approximately 66.5% and for operating expenses to increase by approximately 2% to 3% primarily as a
result of the annual salary increase which took effect at the beginning of the second quarter. As
a result, we expect diluted earnings per share from continuing operations to be in the range of
$0.65 to $0.69 in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
Net cash provided by operations |
|
$ |
216,751 |
|
|
$ |
213,773 |
|
Net cash provided by operations as
a % of revenue |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
35.5 |
% |
At January 29, 2011, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $2,961.1
million. The primary sources of funds for the first three months of fiscal 2011 were net cash
generated from operating activities of $216.8 million, proceeds of $145.0 million relating to a
term loan facility we entered into though a wholly owned subsidiary in December 2010 and $102.0
million in net proceeds from employee stock option exercises. The principal uses of funds for the
first three months of fiscal 2011 were the repurchase of approximately 3.1 million shares of our
common stock for an aggregate of $113.6 million, dividend payments of $65.8 million from a
quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share and capital expenditures of $25.5 million.
29
These factors contributed to the net increase in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
of $273.3 million in the first three months of fiscal 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2011 |
|
October 30, 2010 |
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
384,276 |
|
|
$ |
387,169 |
|
Days sales outstanding |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
282,980 |
|
|
$ |
277,478 |
|
Days cost of sales in inventory |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Accounts receivable at January 29, 2011 decreased $2.9 million, or 1%, from the end of the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The decrease in receivables was primarily the result of lower
revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010,
partially offset by higher product shipments in the final month of the first quarter of fiscal 2011
as compared to the final month of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. Days sales outstanding
increased by 2 days as a result of higher product shipments in the final month of the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 as compared to the final month of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
Inventory at January 29, 2011 increased by $5.5 million, or 2%, from the end of the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in inventory relates primarily to an increase in
manufacturing production to support anticipated higher sales demand. Days cost of sales in
inventory increased 5 days primarily as a result of a decrease in sales activity in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
Current liabilities decreased to $608.5 million at January 29, 2011, a decrease of $35
million, or 5%, from $643.5 million at the end of fiscal 2010. This decrease was primarily due to a
decrease in accrued liabilities relating to variable compensation expense, partially offset by an
increase in the current portion of our long-term debt in relation to the term loan facility entered
into in December 2010 which requires quarterly loan repayments of $3.6 million.
As of January 29, 2011 and October 30, 2010, gross deferred revenue was $336.3 million and
$327.2 million, respectively, and gross deferred cost of sales was $83.0 million and $84.4 million,
respectively. Deferred income on shipments to distributors increased by approximately $10.5 million
in the first three months of fiscal 2011 primarily as a result of our shipments to our distributors
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 exceeding the distributors sales to their customers during
this same time period. Sales to distributors are made under agreements that allow distributors to
receive price adjustment credits and to return qualifying products for credit, as determined by us,
in order to reduce the amounts of slow-moving, discontinued or obsolete product from their
inventory. Given the uncertainties associated with the levels of price adjustment credits to be
granted to distributors, the sales price to the distributors is not fixed or determinable until the
distributors resell the products to their customers. Therefore, we defer revenue recognition from
sales to distributors until the distributors have sold the products to their customers. The amount
of price adjustments is dependent on future overall market conditions, and therefore the levels of
these adjustments could fluctuate significantly from period to period. To the extent that we
experience a significant increase in the amount of credits we issue to our distributors, there
could be a material impact on the ultimate revenue and gross margin recognized relating to these
transactions.
Net additions to property, plant and equipment were $25.5 million in the first three months of
fiscal 2011 and were funded with a combination of cash on hand and cash generated from operations.
We expect capital expenditures to be in the range of $115 million to $135 million in fiscal 2011.
On February 14, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.22 per outstanding
share of common stock. The dividend will be paid on March 23, 2011 to all shareholders of record
at the close of business on March 4, 2011 and is expected to total approximately $66 million. We
currently expect quarterly dividends to continue at $0.22 per share, although they remain subject
to declaration by our Board of Directors. The payment of future dividends, if any, will be based
on several factors including our financial performance, outlook and liquidity.
Our common stock repurchase program has been in place since August 2004. On November 19, 2010,
our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase by us of an additional $1 billion of our common
stock, increasing the total amount of our common stock we are authorized to repurchase under the
program to $5 billion. Under the program, we may repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock
from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions. Unless
terminated earlier by resolution of our Board of Directors, the repurchase program will expire when
we have repurchased all shares authorized under the program. As of January 29, 2011, we had
repurchased a total of approximately
30
119.1 million shares of our common stock for approximately $4,061.8 million under this
program. As of January 29, 2011, an additional $938.2 million worth of shares remains available for
repurchase under the current authorized program. The repurchased shares are held as authorized but
unissued shares of common stock. Any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several
factors including the amount of cash available to us in the United States, and our financial
performance, outlook and liquidity. We also from time to time repurchase shares in settlement of
employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise
of stock options, or in certain limited circumstances to satisfy the exercise price of options
granted to our employees under our equity compensation plans.
On June 30, 2009, we issued $375 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% senior unsecured
notes due July 1, 2014 (the Notes) with annual interest payments of 5.0% paid in two installments
on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2010. The net proceeds of the offering
were $370.4 million, after issuing at a discount and deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and
commissions, which will be amortized over the term of the Notes. We swapped the fixed interest
portion of these Notes for a variable interest rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 2.05%
(2.35% as of January 29, 2011). The variable interest payments based on the variable annual rate
are payable quarterly. The LIBOR based rate is set quarterly three months prior to the date of the
interest payment. The indenture governing the Notes contains covenants that may limit our ability
to: incur, create, assume or guarantee any debt for borrowed money secured by a lien upon a
principal property; enter into sale and lease-back transactions with respect to a principal
property; and consolidate with or merge into, or transfer or lease all or substantially all of our
assets to any other party. On December 22, 2010, Analog Devices Holdings B.V. a wholly owned
subsidiary of ours, entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., London Branch as
administrative agent. The borrowers obligations are guaranteed by us. The credit agreement
provides for a term loan facility of $145 million, which matures on December 22, 2013. The terms
of the agreement provide for a three-year principle amortization schedule with $3.6 million payable
quarterly every March, June, September and December with the balance payable upon the maturity
date. The loan will bear interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the annual LIBOR
rate applicable to that interest period plus 1.25% (1.55% as of January 29, 2011). The terms of
this facility include limitations on subsidiary indebtedness and on liens against our assets and
the assets of our subsidiaries, and also include financial covenants that require us to maintain a
minimum interest coverage ratio and not exceed a maximum leverage ratio. The proceeds of this loan
are being used to restructure our captive finance subsidiaries. In addition, we have a five-year
$165 million unsecured revolving credit facility that expires in May 2013. To date, we have not
borrowed under this credit facility but we may borrow in the future and use the proceeds for
support of commercial paper issuance, stock repurchases, dividend payments, acquisitions, capital
expenditures, working capital and other lawful corporate purposes.
At January 29, 2011, our principal source of liquidity was $2,961.1 million of cash and cash
equivalents and short-term investments of which approximately $922.4 million was held in the United
States. The balance of our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments was held outside
the United States in various foreign subsidiaries. As we intend to reinvest certain of our foreign
earnings indefinitely, this cash held outside the United States is not available to meet certain of
our cash requirements in the United States, including for cash dividends and common stock
repurchases.
We believe that our existing sources of liquidity and cash expected to be generated from
future operations, together with existing and anticipated available long-term financing, will be
sufficient to fund operations, capital expenditures, research and development efforts, dividend
payments (if any) and repurchases of our stock (if any) under our stock repurchase program in the
immediate future and for at least the next twelve months.
Contractual Obligations
On December 22, 2010, Analog Devices Holdings B.V. a wholly owned subsidiary of ours, entered
into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., London Branch as administrative agent. The
borrowers obligations are guaranteed by us. The credit agreement provides for a term loan facility
of $145 million, which matures on December 22, 2013. The terms of the agreement provide for a
three-year principle amortization schedule with $3.6 million payable quarterly every March, June,
September and December with the balance payable upon the maturity date. The loan will bear
interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the annual LIBOR rate applicable to that
interest period plus 1.25% (1.55% as of January 29, 2011). The terms of this facility include
limitations on subsidiary indebtedness and on liens against our assets and the assets of our
subsidiaries, and also include financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum interest
coverage ratio and not exceed a maximum leverage ratio. As of January 29, 2011, we were compliant
with these covenants. As of January 29, 2011, $14.5 million of this debt was classified as
short-term.
Assuming the current three-month LIBOR remains the same for the duration of the agreement and
assuming the debt obligations are held to maturity, the following amounts will be due under the
credit agreement and were not previously reflected in the contractual obligations table contained
in the section entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of
31
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended October 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
Payment due by period |
|
|
More than |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
145,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,500 |
|
|
$ |
130,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest payments associated with long-term debt obligations |
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
3,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
150,925 |
|
|
$ |
16,710 |
|
|
$ |
134,215 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There have not been any other material changes during the first three months of fiscal 2011 to
the amounts presented in the table summarizing our contractual obligations included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2010.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13 Revenue Recognition (Topic 605):
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (formerly EITF Issue No. 08-1). This standard modifies
the revenue recognition guidance for arrangements that involve the delivery of multiple elements,
such as product, software, services or support, to a customer at different times as part of a
single revenue generating transaction. This standard provides principles and application guidance
to determine whether multiple deliverables exist, how the individual deliverables should be
separated and how to allocate the revenue in the arrangement among those separate deliverables. The
standard also expands the disclosure requirements for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements.
ASU No. 2009-13 is effective for fiscal years that begin on or after June 15, 2010, which is our
fiscal year 2011. The adoption of ASU No. 2009-13 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 did not have
a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Business Combinations
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2010-29, Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805) Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma
Information for Business Combinations (ASU No. 2010-29). ASU No. 2010-29 requires a public entity
to disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that
occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the prior year. It also
requires a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring adjustments directly
attributable to the business combination included in the reported revenue and earnings. The new
disclosure will be effective for our first quarter of fiscal year 2012. The adoption of ASU No.
2010-29 will require additional disclosure in the event of a business combination but will not have
a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Intangibles Goodwill and Other
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles- Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic
350). ASU No. 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with
zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step
2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists.
In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity
should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may
exist. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2010, which is our
fiscal year 2012. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that ASU No. 2010-28 may have on
our financial condition and results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There were no material changes in the first three months of fiscal 2011 to the information
provided under the heading Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2010.
32
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Exposure
On December 22, 2010, Analog Devices Holdings B.V. a wholly owned subsidiary of
ours, entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., London Branch as administrative
agent. The borrowers obligations are guaranteed by us. The credit agreement provides for a term
loan facility of $145 million, which matures on December 22, 2013. The loan will bear interest at
a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the annual LIBOR rate applicable to that interest
period plus 1.25% (1.55% as of January 29, 2011). If LIBOR changes by 100 basis points, our annual
interest expense would change by approximately an additional $1.0 million from the amount set forth
in the information provided under Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 30, 2010.
There have been no other material changes in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 in the
information provided under Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 30, 2010.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of Analogs
disclosure controls and procedures as of January 29, 2011. The term disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on
the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of January 29, 2011, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. No change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred
during the quarter ended January 29, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
33
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Set forth below and elsewhere in this report and in other documents we file with the SEC are
descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this
report. The description below includes any material changes to and supersedes the description of
the risk factors affecting our business previously discussed in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2010.
Disruptions in global credit and financial markets could materially and adversely affect our
business and results of operations.
Global credit and financial markets appear to be recovering from extreme disruptions
experienced over the past two years. However, uncertainty about continuing economic stability
remains. These economic uncertainties affect businesses such as ours in a number of ways, making it
difficult to accurately forecast and plan our future business activities. High unemployment rates,
continued weakness in commercial and residential real estate markets and the tightening of credit
by financial institutions may lead consumers and businesses to continue to postpone spending, which
may cause our customers to cancel, decrease or delay their existing and future orders with us. In
addition, financial difficulties experienced by our suppliers or distributors could result in
product delays, increased accounts receivable defaults and inventory challenges. Financial turmoil
may cause financial institutions to consolidate or go out of business, which increases the risk
that the actual amounts realized in the future on our financial instruments could differ
significantly from the fair value assigned to them. During the global financial crisis, many
governments adopted stimulus or spending programs designed to ease the economic impact of the
crisis. Some of our businesses benefited from these stimulus programs and as these programs
conclude, those businesses could be negatively impacted. The recent debt crisis in certain European
countries could cause the value of the Euro to deteriorate, thus reducing the purchasing power of
our European customers. In addition, the recent European debt crisis and related financial
restructuring efforts has contributed to the instability in global credit markets. We are unable to
predict the impact of these events on the apparent economic recovery, and if economic conditions
deteriorate again, we may record additional charges relating to restructuring costs or the
impairment of assets and our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
Our future revenue, gross margins, operating results and net income are difficult to predict and
may materially fluctuate.
Our future revenue, gross margins, operating results and net income are difficult to predict
and may be materially affected by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
the effects of adverse economic conditions in the United States and international
markets; |
|
|
|
changes in customer demand for our products and for end products that incorporate our
products; |
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our efforts to refocus our operations, including our ability to
reduce our cost structure in both the short term and over a longer duration; |
|
|
|
the timing of new product announcements or introductions by us, our customers or our
competitors; |
|
|
|
competitive pricing pressures; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in manufacturing yields, adequate availability of wafers and other raw
materials, and manufacturing, assembly and test capacity; |
|
|
|
the ability of our third party suppliers, subcontractors and manufacturers to supply us
with sufficient quantities of products or components; |
|
|
|
any significant decline in our backlog; |
|
|
|
the timing, delay or cancellation of significant customer orders and our ability to
manage inventory; |
|
|
|
our ability to hire, retain and motivate adequate numbers of engineers and other
qualified employees to meet the demands of our customers; |
34
|
|
|
changes in geographic, product or customer mix; |
|
|
|
our ability to utilize our manufacturing facilities at efficient levels; |
|
|
|
potential significant litigation-related costs; |
|
|
|
the difficulties inherent in forecasting future operating expense levels, including with
respect to costs associated with labor, utilities, transportation and raw materials; |
|
|
|
the costs related to compliance with increasing worldwide environmental regulations; |
|
|
|
changes in our effective tax rates in the United States, Ireland or worldwide; and |
|
|
|
the effects of public health emergencies, natural disasters, widespread travel
disruptions, security risks, terrorist activities, international conflicts and other events
beyond our control. |
In addition, the semiconductor market has historically been cyclical and subject to
significant economic upturns and downturns. Our business is subject to rapid technological changes
and there can be no assurance, depending on the mix of future business, that products stocked in
our inventory will not be rendered obsolete before we ship them. As a result of these and other
factors, there can be no assurance that we will not experience material fluctuations in future
revenue, gross margins, operating results and net income on a quarterly or annual basis. In
addition, if our revenue, gross margins, operating results and net income do not meet the
expectations of securities analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock may decline.
Changes
in our effective tax rate may impact our results of
operations.
A number of factors may increase our future effective tax rate, including: increases in tax
rates in various jurisdictions; the jurisdictions in which profits are earned and taxed; the
resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; changes in the valuation
of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; adjustments to income taxes upon finalization of
various tax returns; increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of
acquired in-process research and development and impairments of goodwill in connection with
acquisitions; changes in available tax credits; and changes in tax laws or the interpretation of
such tax laws. Any significant increase in our future effective tax rates could adversely impact
our net income for future periods.
Long-term contracts are not typical for us and reductions, cancellations or delays in orders for
our products could adversely affect our operating results.
We typically do not have long-term sales contracts with our customers. In certain markets
where end-user demand may be particularly volatile and difficult to predict, some customers place
orders that require us to manufacture product and have it available for shipment, even though the
customer is unwilling to make a binding commitment to purchase all, or even any, of the product. In
other instances, we manufacture product based on forecasts of customer demands. As a result, we may
incur inventory and manufacturing costs in advance of anticipated sales and are subject to the risk
of cancellations of orders, leading to a sharp reduction of sales and backlog. Further, orders or
forecasts may be for products that meet the customers unique requirements so that those cancelled
or unrealized orders would, in addition, result in an inventory of unsaleable products, causing
potential inventory write-offs. As a result of lengthy manufacturing cycles for certain of the
products that are subject to these uncertainties, the amount of unsaleable product could be
substantial. Incorrect forecasts, or reductions, cancellations or delays in orders for our products
could adversely affect our operating results.
Our future success depends upon our ability to continue to innovate, improve our products, develop
and market new products, and identify and enter new markets.
Our success significantly depends on our continued ability to improve our products and develop
and market innovative new products. Product development, innovation and enhancement is often a
complex, time-consuming and costly process involving significant investment in research and
development, with no assurance of return on investment. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to develop and introduce new and improved products in a timely or efficient manner or that new
and improved products, if developed, will achieve market acceptance. Our products generally must
conform to various evolving and sometimes competing industry standards, which may adversely affect
our ability to compete in certain markets or require us to incur significant costs. In addition,
our customers generally impose very high quality and reliability standards on our products, which
often change and may be difficult or costly to satisfy. Any inability to satisfy customer quality
standards or comply with industry standards and technical requirements may adversely affect demand
for our products and our results of operations. In
35
addition, our growth is dependent on our continued
ability to identify and penetrate new markets where we have limited experience and competition is
intense. Also, some of our customers in these markets are less established, which could subject us
to increased credit risk. There can be no assurance that the markets we serve will grow in the
future, that our existing and new products will meet the requirements of these markets, that our
products will achieve customer acceptance in these markets, that competitors will not force price
reductions or take market share from us, or that we can achieve or maintain adequate gross margins
or profits in these markets. Furthermore, a decline in demand in one or several of our end-user
markets could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products and our results of
operations.
We may not be able to compete successfully in markets within the semiconductor industry in the
future.
We face intense technological and pricing competition in the semiconductor industry, and we
expect this competition to increase in the future, including from companies located outside the
United States. Many other companies offer products that compete with our products. Some have
greater financial, manufacturing, technical, sales and marketing resources than we have. Some of
our competitors may have more advantageous supply or development relationships with our current and
potential customers or suppliers. Our competitors also include emerging companies selling
specialized products in markets we serve. Competition is generally based on design and quality of
products, product performance, features and functionality, and product pricing, availability and
capacity, with the relative importance of these factors varying among products, markets and
customers. Existing or new competitors may develop products or technologies that more effectively
address the demands of our customers and markets with enhanced performance, features and
functionality, lower power requirements, greater levels of integration or lower cost. Increased
competition in certain markets has resulted in and may continue to result in declining average
selling prices, reduced gross margins and loss of market share in those markets. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the future against existing or new
competitors, or that our operating results will not be adversely affected by increased competition.
We rely on third-party suppliers, subcontractors and manufacturers for some industry-standard
wafers, manufacturing processes and assembly and test services, and generally cannot control their
availability or conditions of supply.
We rely, and plan to continue to rely, on suppliers, assembly and test subcontractors, and
third-party wafer fabricators to supply most of our wafers that can be manufactured using
industry-standard submicron processes. This reliance involves several risks, including reduced
control over availability, capacity utilization, delivery schedules, manufacturing yields, and
costs. Additionally, we utilize a limited number of third-party wafer fabricators, primarily Taiwan
Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC. In addition, these suppliers often provide
manufacturing services to our competitors and therefore periods of increased industry demand may
result in capacity constraints. In certain instances, the third party supplier is the sole source
of highly specialized processing services. If our suppliers are unable or unwilling to manufacture
and deliver components to us on the time schedule and of the quality or quantity that we require or
provide us with required manufacturing processes, we may be forced to seek to engage additional or
replacement suppliers, which could result in additional expenses and delays in product development
or shipment of product to our customers. If replacement suppliers or manufacturing processes are
not available, we may also experience delays in product development or shipment which could, in
turn, result in the temporary or permanent loss of customers. A significant portion of our revenue
for the first three months of fiscal 2011 was from products fabricated at third-party
wafer-fabrication facilities, primarily TSMC.
The markets for semiconductor products are cyclical, and increased production may lead to
overcapacity and lower prices, and conversely, we may not be able to satisfy unexpected demand for
our products.
The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry has resulted in periods when demand for our
products has increased or decreased rapidly. If we expand our operations and workforce too rapidly
or procure excessive resources in anticipation of increased demand for our products, and that
demand does not materialize at the pace at which we expect or declines, or if we overbuild
inventory in a period of decreased demand, our operating results may be adversely affected as a
result of increased operating expenses, reduced margins, underutilization of capacity or asset
impairment charges. These capacity expansions by us and other semiconductor manufacturers could
also lead to overcapacity in our target markets which could lead to price erosion that would
adversely impact our operating results. Conversely, during periods of rapid increases in demand,
our available capacity may not be sufficient to satisfy the demand. In addition, we may not be able
to expand our workforce and operations in a sufficiently timely manner, procure adequate resources,
or locate suitable third-party suppliers, to respond effectively to changes in demand for our
existing products or to the demand for new products requested by our customers, and our current or
future business could be materially and adversely affected.
Our semiconductor products are complex and we may be subject to product warranty and indemnity
claims, which could result in significant costs and damage to our reputation and adversely affect
the market acceptance of our products.
Semiconductor products are highly complex and may contain defects when they are first
introduced or as new versions are developed. We generally warrant our products to our customers for
one year from the date title passes from us. We invest
36
significant resources in the testing of our
products; however, if any of our products contain defects, we may be required to incur additional
development and remediation costs, pursuant to warranty and indemnification provisions in our
customer contracts and purchase orders. These problems may divert our technical and other resources
from other product development efforts and could result in claims against us by our customers or
others, including liability for costs associated with product recalls, which may adversely impact
our operating results. We may also be subject to customer indemnity claims. Our customers have on
occasion been sued, and may in the future be sued, by third parties with respect to infringement or
other product matters, and those customers may seek indemnification from us under the terms and
conditions of our sales contracts with them. In certain cases, our potential indemnification
liability may be significant. If any of our products contains defects, or has reliability, quality
or compatibility problems, our reputation may be damaged, which could make it more difficult for us
to sell our products to existing and prospective customers and could adversely affect our operating
results.
We have manufacturing processes that utilize a substantial amount of technology as the
fabrication of integrated circuits is a highly complex and precise process. Minute impurities,
contaminants in the manufacturing environment, difficulties in the fabrication process, defects in
the masks used in the wafer manufacturing process, manufacturing equipment failures, wafer breakage
or other factors can cause a substantial percentage of wafers to be rejected or numerous dice on
each wafer to be nonfunctional. While we have significant expertise in semiconductor manufacturing,
it is possible that some processes could become unstable. This instability could result in
manufacturing delays and product shortages, which could have a material adverse effect on our
operating results.
We are involved in frequent litigation, including regarding intellectual property rights, which
could be costly to bring or defend and could require us to redesign products or pay significant
royalties.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent claims and litigation involving patent
and other intellectual property rights, including claims arising under our contractual obligations
to indemnify our customers. Other companies or individuals have obtained patents covering a variety
of semiconductor designs and processes, and we might be required to obtain licenses under some of
these patents or be precluded from making and selling infringing products, if those patents are
found to be valid. From time to time, we receive claims from third parties asserting that our
products or processes infringe their patents or other intellectual property rights. In the event a
third party makes a valid intellectual property claim against us and a license is not available to
us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we could be forced either to redesign or to stop
production of products incorporating that intellectual property, and our operating results could be
materially and adversely affected. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our patents or other of
our intellectual property rights or to defend us against claims of infringement, and this
litigation could be costly and divert the attention of our key personnel. We could be subject to
warranty or product liability claims that could lead to significant costs and expenses as we defend
those claims or pay damage awards. There can be no assurance that we are adequately insured to
protect against all claims and potential liabilities. We may incur costs and expenses relating to a
recall of our customers products due to an alleged failure of components we supply. An adverse
outcome in litigation could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or on our
operating results or cash flows in the period in which the litigation is resolved.
We may be unable to adequately protect our proprietary rights, which may limit our ability to
compete effectively.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property. We
primarily rely on patent, mask work, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as
nondisclosure agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary technologies and processes.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary technologies and processes, it is possible that
competitors or other unauthorized third parties may obtain, copy, use or disclose our technologies,
products and processes. Moreover, the laws of foreign countries in which we design, manufacture,
market and sell our products may afford little or no effective protection of our proprietary
technology.
There can be no assurance that the claims allowed in our issued patents will be sufficiently
broad to protect our technology. In addition, any of our existing or future patents may be
challenged, invalidated or circumvented. As such, any rights granted under these patents may not
provide us with meaningful protection. We may not have foreign patents or pending applications
corresponding to our U.S. patents and applications. Even if foreign patents are granted, effective
enforcement in foreign countries may not be available. If our patents and mask works do not
adequately protect our technology, our competitors may be able to offer products similar to ours.
Our competitors may also be able to develop similar technology independently or design around our
patents.
We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and
strategic partners. We also try to control access to and distribution of our technologies,
documentation and other proprietary information. Despite these efforts, internal or external
parties may attempt to copy, disclose, obtain or use our products or technology without our
authorization.
37
Also, former employees may seek employment with our business partners, customers or
competitors, and there can be no assurance that the confidential nature of our proprietary
information will be maintained in the course of such future employment.
If we do not retain our key personnel, our ability to execute our business strategy will be
adversely affected.
Our continued success depends to a significant extent upon the recruitment, retention and
effective succession of our executive officers and key management and technical personnel,
particularly our experienced engineers. The competition for these employees is intense. The loss of
the services of one or more of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our
operating results. In addition, there could be a material adverse effect on our business should the
turnover rates for engineers and other key personnel increase significantly or if we are unable to
continue to attract qualified personnel. We do not maintain any key person life insurance policy on
any of our officers or employees.
To remain competitive, we may need to acquire other companies, purchase or license technology from
third parties, or enter into other strategic transactions in order to introduce new products or
enhance our existing products.
An element of our business strategy involves expansion through the acquisitions of businesses,
assets, products or technologies that allow us to complement our existing product offerings, expand
our market coverage, increase our engineering workforce or enhance our technological capabilities.
We may not be able to find businesses that have the technology or resources we need and, if we find
such businesses, we may not be able to purchase or license the technology or resources on
commercially favorable terms or at all. Acquisitions and technology licenses are difficult to
identify and complete for a number of reasons, including the cost of potential transactions,
competition among prospective buyers and licensees, the need for regulatory approvals, and
difficulties related to integration efforts. Both in the U.S. and abroad, governmental regulation
of acquisitions has become more complex, increasing the costs and risks of undertaking significant
acquisitions. In order to finance a potential transaction, we may need to raise additional funds by
issuing securities or borrowing money. We may not be able to find financing on favorable terms, and
the sale of our stock may result in the dilution of our existing shareholders or the issuance of
securities with rights that are superior to the rights of our common shareholders.
Acquisitions also involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulty integrating acquired technologies, operations and personnel with our existing
businesses; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of management attention in connection with both negotiating the acquisitions
and integrating the assets; |
|
|
|
|
strain on managerial and operational resources as management tries to oversee larger
operations; |
|
|
|
|
the future funding requirements for acquired companies, which may be significant; |
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies; and |
|
|
|
|
increased risk of costly and time-consuming litigation. |
If we are unable to successfully address these risks, we may not realize some or all of the
expected benefits of the acquisition, which may have an adverse effect on our business plans and
operating results.
We rely on manufacturing capacity located in geologically unstable areas, which could affect the
availability of supplies and services.
We, like many companies in the semiconductor industry, rely on internal manufacturing
capacity, wafer fabrication foundries and other sub-contractors in geologically unstable locations
around the world. This reliance involves risks associated with the impact of earthquakes on us and
the semiconductor industry, including temporary loss of capacity, availability and cost of key raw
materials, utilities and equipment and availability of key services, including transport of our
products worldwide. Any prolonged inability to utilize one of our manufacturing facilities, or
those of our subcontractors or third-party wafer fabrication foundries, as a result of fire,
natural disaster, unavailability of utilities or otherwise, could result in a temporary or
permanent loss of customers for affected products, which could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and financial condition.
38
We are exposed to business, economic, political, legal and other risks through our significant
worldwide operations.
We have significant operations and manufacturing facilities outside the United States,
including in Ireland and the Philippines. During the first three months of fiscal 2011, we derived
approximately 82% of our revenue from customers in international markets. Although we engage in
hedging transactions to reduce our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations, there can be no
assurance that our competitive position will not be adversely affected by changes in the exchange
rate of the United States dollar against other currencies. Potential interest rate increases, as
well as high energy costs, could have an adverse impact on industrial and consumer spending
patterns and could adversely impact demand for our products. While a majority of our cash is
generated outside the United States, we require a substantial amount of cash in the United States
for operating requirements, stock repurchases, cash dividends and acquisitions. If we are unable to
address our U.S. cash requirements through operations, through borrowings under our current credit
facility or from other sources of cash obtained at an acceptable cost, our business strategies and
operating results could be adversely affected.
In addition to being exposed to the ongoing economic cycles in the semiconductor industry, we
are also subject to the economic, political and legal risks inherent in international operations,
including the risks associated with the recent crisis in global credit and financial markets,
ongoing uncertainties and political and economic instability in many countries around the world, as
well as economic disruption from acts of terrorism and the response to them by the United States
and its allies. Other business risks associated with global operations include increased managerial
complexities, air transportation disruptions, expropriation, currency controls, currency exchange
rate movement, additional costs related to foreign taxes, tariffs and freight rate increases,
exposure to different business practices and legal standards, particularly with respect to price
protection, competition practices, intellectual property, anti- corruption and environmental
compliance, trade and travel restrictions, pandemics, import and export license requirements and
restrictions, difficulties in staffing and managing worldwide operations, and accounts receivable
collections.
We expect to continue to expand our business and operations in China. Our success in the
Chinese markets may be adversely affected by Chinas continuously evolving laws and regulations,
including those relating to taxation, import and export tariffs, currency controls, environmental
regulations, anti-corruption, and intellectual property rights and enforcement of those rights.
Enforcement of existing laws or agreements may be inconsistent. In addition, changes in the
political environment, governmental policies or U.S.-China relations could result in revisions to
laws or regulations or their interpretation and enforcement, increased taxation, restrictions on
imports, import duties or currency revaluations, which could have an adverse effect on our business
plans and operating results.
Our operating results are dependent on the performance of independent distributors.
A significant portion of our sales are through independent distributors that are not under our
control. These independent distributors generally represent product lines offered by several
companies and thus could reduce their sales efforts applied to our products or they could terminate
their representation of us. We generally do not require letters of credit from our distributors and
are not protected against accounts receivable default or bankruptcy by these distributors. Our
inability to collect open accounts receivable could adversely affect our operating results.
Termination of a significant distributor, whether at our initiative or the distributors
initiative, could disrupt our current business, and if we are unable to find suitable replacements,
our operating results could be adversely affected.
We are subject to increasingly strict environmental health and safety (EHS) regulations, which
could increase our expenses and affect our operating results.
Our industry is subject to increasingly strict EHS requirements, particularly those
environmental requirements that control and restrict the use, transportation, emission, discharge,
storage and disposal of certain chemicals used or produced in the semiconductor manufacturing
process. Public attention to environmental concerns continues to increase, and our customers
routinely include stringent environmental standards in their contracts with us. Changes in
environmental laws or regulations may require us to invest in costly equipment or alter the way our
products are made. In addition, we use hazardous and other regulated materials that subject us to
risks of strict liability for damages caused by potential or actual releases of such materials. Any
failure to control such materials adequately or to comply with statutory or regulatory standards or
contractual obligations could result in liability for damages, penalties, and civil and criminal
fines, and might damage our reputation, increase our expenses, and adversely affect our operating
results.
New climate change laws and regulations could require us to change our manufacturing processes
or obtain substitute materials that may cost more or be less available for our manufacturing
operations. In addition, new restrictions on emissions of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases
could result in significant costs for us. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has
adopted greenhouse gas regulations, and the U.S. Congress may pass federal greenhouse gas
legislation in the future. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued greenhouse gas
reporting regulations that may apply to certain of our operations. EPA is developing other climate
change-based regulations, as are certain states, that also may increase our expenses
39
and adversely
affect our operating results. We expect increased worldwide regulatory activity relating to climate
change in the future. Compliance with these laws and regulations has not had a material impact on
our capital expenditures, earnings, financial condition or competitive position. There is no
assurance that the cost to comply with current or future EHS laws and regulations will not exceed
our estimates or adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. Additionally,
any failure by us to comply with applicable EHS requirements or contractual obligations could
result in penalties, civil and criminal fines, suspension of or changes to production, legal
liability and damage to our reputation.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow, we may not be able to service our debt
obligations, including making payments on our $375 million senior unsecured notes or our $145
million term loan facility.
In fiscal 2009, we issued in a public offering $375 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0%
senior unsecured notes due July 1, 2014. In December 2010, we entered into a $145 million term loan
facility which matures on December 22, 2013. Our ability to make payments of principal and
interest on our indebtedness when due depends upon our future performance, which will be subject to
general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial, business and other factors affecting
our consolidated operations, many of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to generate
sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt, we may be required to,
among other things:
|
|
|
seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets; |
|
|
|
|
refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the notes; |
|
|
|
|
sell selected assets; |
|
|
|
|
reduce or delay planned capital expenditures; or |
|
|
|
|
reduce or delay planned operating expenditures. |
Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt, including the notes or
our term loan facility, which could negatively impact our financial results. In addition, any such
financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms.
Restrictions in our credit facility and outstanding debt instruments may limit our activities.
Our current credit and term loan facilities and our 5.0% senior unsecured notes impose, and
future debt instruments to which we may become subject may impose, restrictions that limit our
ability to engage in activities that could otherwise benefit our company, including to undertake
certain transactions, to create certain liens on our assets and to incur certain subsidiary
indebtedness. Our ability to comply with these financial restrictions and covenants is dependent on
our future performance, which is subject to prevailing economic conditions and other factors,
including factors that are beyond our control such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates,
changes in technology and changes in the level of competition. In addition, our credit and term
loan facilities require us to maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. If we breach any
of the covenants under our credit or term loan facilities or the indenture governing our
outstanding notes and do not obtain appropriate waivers, then, subject to applicable cure periods,
our outstanding indebtedness thereunder could be declared immediately due and payable.
Our stock price may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock has been volatile in the past and may be volatile in the
future, as it may be significantly affected by the following factors:
|
|
|
crises in global credit, debt and financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our revenue and operating results; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts or our failure to perform in line
with those estimates or our published guidance; |
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of other semiconductor companies; |
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant new products, technical
innovations, acquisitions or dispositions, litigation or capital commitments; |
|
|
|
|
departures of key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
actual or perceived noncompliance with corporate responsibility or ethics standards by us
or any of our employees, officers or directors; and |
|
|
|
|
negative media publicity targeting us or our competitors. |
40
The stock market has historically experienced volatility, especially within the semiconductor
industry, that often has been unrelated to the performance of particular companies. These market
fluctuations may cause our stock price to fall regardless of our operating results.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Value of Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
(a) |
|
|
Paid Per Share (b) |
|
|
Programs (c) |
|
|
Programs |
|
October 31, 2010
through
November 27, 2010 |
|
|
900,688 |
|
|
$ |
34.65 |
|
|
|
899,915 |
|
|
$ |
1,020,584,324 |
|
November 28,
2010 through
December 25, 2010 |
|
|
1,240,860 |
|
|
$ |
37.31 |
|
|
|
1,240,225 |
|
|
$ |
974,316,579 |
|
December 26, 2010
through
January 29, 2011 |
|
|
940,694 |
|
|
$ |
38.44 |
|
|
|
940,478 |
|
|
$ |
938,161,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,082,242 |
|
|
$ |
36.88 |
|
|
|
3,080,618 |
|
|
$ |
938,161,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes 1,624 shares shares paid to us by employees to satisfy employee tax
obligations upon vesting of restricted stock units granted to our employees under our
equity compensation plans. |
|
(b) |
|
The average price paid per share of stock repurchased under the stock repurchase
program includes the commissions paid to the brokers. |
|
(c) |
|
Shares repurchased pursuant to the stock repurchase program publicly announced on
August 12, 2004. On November 19, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase by
us of an additional $1 billion of our common stock, increasing the total amount of our
common stock we are authorized to repurchase under the program to $5 billion. Under the
repurchase program, we may repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock from time to
time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions. Unless terminated
earlier by resolution of our Board of Directors, the repurchase program will expire when we
have repurchased all shares authorized for repurchase under the repurchase program. |
ITEM 6. Exhibits
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
|
|
Date: February 15, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Jerald G. Fishman
|
|
|
|
Jerald G. Fishman |
|
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 15, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ David A. Zinsner
|
|
|
|
David A. Zinsner |
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
42
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
2011 Executive Performance Incentive Plan, described in the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819) on November 4, 2010 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Global Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for use under the
Companys 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, filed as exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819) on December 3,
2010 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Form of Global Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for use under the Companys
2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, filed as exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819) on December 3, 2010
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Chief Executive Officer). |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Chief Financial Officer). |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Schema Document. |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. |
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29,
2011 and October 30, 2010, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three
months ended January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus
for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
43