e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From _____ to _____
Commission File Number 1-12001
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1792394 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1000 Six PPG Place
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15222-5479 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(412) 394-2800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At April 25, 2011, the registrant had outstanding 98,969,856 shares of its Common Stock.
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
SEC FORM 10-Q
Quarter Ended March 31, 2011
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
(Current period unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
816.3 |
|
|
$ |
432.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for
doubtful accounts of $5.6 both
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
694.0 |
|
|
|
545.4 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,231.9 |
|
|
|
1,024.5 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
112.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,787.1 |
|
|
|
2,115.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,999.2 |
|
|
|
1,989.3 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
209.1 |
|
|
|
206.8 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
197.1 |
|
|
|
182.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
5,192.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,493.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
505.2 |
|
|
$ |
394.1 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
270.8 |
|
|
|
249.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Short term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
139.4 |
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
915.4 |
|
|
|
791.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,422.5 |
|
|
|
921.9 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
417.6 |
|
|
|
423.8 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
68.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
2,989.4 |
|
|
|
2,364.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.10: authorized-50,000,000 shares; issued-none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.10: authorized-500,000,000
shares; issued-102,404,256 shares at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010; outstanding-98,943,595 shares at
March 31, 2011 and 98,542,291 shares at December 31,
2010 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
653.6 |
|
|
|
658.9 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,264.4 |
|
|
|
2,224.8 |
|
Treasury stock: 3,460,661 shares at March 31, 2011 and
3,861,965 shares at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(168.7 |
) |
|
|
(188.0 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(649.0 |
) |
|
|
(665.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
2,110.5 |
|
|
|
2,040.8 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
2,203.1 |
|
|
|
2,129.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
5,192.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,493.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
1
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,227.4 |
|
|
$ |
899.4 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
1,022.0 |
|
|
|
778.0 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
74.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, other income
and income taxes |
|
|
116.7 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income attributable to ATI per common share |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income attributable to ATI per common share |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
58.7 |
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
24.8 |
|
Changes in operating asset and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(207.4 |
) |
|
|
(145.6 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(148.6 |
) |
|
|
(80.5 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
111.1 |
|
|
|
88.1 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(50.3 |
) |
|
|
(72.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(42.2 |
) |
|
|
(51.2 |
) |
Asset disposals and other |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
|
|
(50.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of long-term debt |
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
Net borrowings (payments) under credit facilities |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
Taxes on share-based compensation |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Exercises of stock options |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Shares repurchased for income tax withholding on
share-based compensation |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
476.0 |
|
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
384.0 |
|
|
|
(145.3 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
432.3 |
|
|
|
708.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
816.3 |
|
|
$ |
563.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Statements of Changes in Consolidated Equity
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Treasury |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Comprehensive |
|
controlling |
|
Total |
|
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Stock |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Interests |
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
653.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,230.5 |
|
|
$ |
(208.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(673.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
77.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,089.6 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
Foreign currency translation losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
Unrealized gains on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
18.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.18 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
Employee stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
640.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,227.2 |
|
|
$ |
(185.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(673.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
79.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,098.5 |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
658.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,224.8 |
|
|
$ |
(188.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(665.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
88.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,129.4 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Foreign currency translation gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
Unrealized losses on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.18 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
Employee stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
653.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,264.4 |
|
|
$ |
(168.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(649.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,203.1 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unaudited
Note 1. Accounting Policies
The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and its subsidiaries. Unless the context requires otherwise, Allegheny
Technologies, ATI and the Company refer to Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and its
subsidiaries.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and note disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In managements opinion, all adjustments (which include only
normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The results of operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the operating results for any future period. The December 31, 2010 financial information has been
derived from the Companys audited financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
On January 1, 2011, the Company prospectively adopted changes issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to revenue recognition for multiple-deliverable arrangements.
These changes affect the accounting and reporting of revenues related to bundled sales arrangements
with customers to provide multiple products and services at different points in time or over
different time periods. The adoption of these changes had no impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted changes issued by the FASB to disclosure requirements
for disaggregated disclosure of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs,
which are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. These changes had no impact on the
March 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements, but will further enhance the fair value
disclosures within the December 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements.
Note 2. Inventories
Inventories at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
$ |
191.4 |
|
|
$ |
169.3 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
1,064.4 |
|
|
|
892.8 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
143.3 |
|
|
|
126.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories at current cost |
|
|
1,399.1 |
|
|
|
1,188.6 |
|
Less allowances to reduce current cost values to LIFO basis |
|
|
(166.9 |
) |
|
|
(163.0 |
) |
Progress payments |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
1,231.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,024.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out
(FIFO), and average cost methods) or market, less progress payments. Most of the Companys
inventory is valued utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of the Companys non-U.S.
operations is valued using average cost or FIFO methods. The effect of using the LIFO methodology
to value inventory, rather than FIFO, increased cost of sales by $3.9 million for the first three
months of 2011. There was no effect of using the LIFO methodology to value inventory, rather than
FIFO for the first three months of 2010.
5
Note 3. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
667.0 |
|
|
|
638.2 |
|
Equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
2,766.4 |
|
|
|
2,750.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,459.4 |
|
|
|
3,414.8 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,460.2 |
) |
|
|
(1,425.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,999.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,989.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Debt
Debt at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Allegheny Technologies 5.95% Notes due 2021 |
|
$ |
500.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Allegheny Technologies 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2014 |
|
|
402.5 |
|
|
|
402.5 |
|
Allegheny Technologies 9.375% Notes due 2019 |
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
Allegheny Technologies 8.375% Notes due 2011, net (a) |
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
117.3 |
|
Allegheny Ludlum 6.95% debentures due 2025 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
Domestic Bank Group $400 million unsecured credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note for J&L asset acquisition |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Foreign credit facilities |
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
Industrial revenue bonds, due through 2020, and other |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term debt |
|
|
1,561.9 |
|
|
|
1,063.3 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
139.4 |
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,422.5 |
|
|
$ |
921.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fair value adjustments for settled interest rate swap contracts of $0.7
million at March 31, 2011 and $0.9 million at December 31, 2010. |
On January 7, 2011, ATI issued $500 million of 5.95% Senior Notes due January 15, 2021 (2021
Notes). Interest is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year. The 2021 Notes
were issued under ATIs shelf registration statement and are not listed on any national securities
exchange. Net proceeds of $495.0 million from the sale of the 2021 Notes are intended to be used
for the cash portion of the merger consideration to be paid in the planned acquisition of Ladish
Co., Inc. (Ladish), with any additional proceeds used for general corporate purposes. The
underwriting fees, discount, and other third-party expenses for the issuance of the 2021 Notes were
$5.0 million and will be amortized to interest expense over the 10-year term of the 2021 Notes.
The 2021 Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the Company and equally ranked with
all of its existing and future senior unsecured debt. The 2021 Notes restrict the Companys ability
to create certain liens, to enter into sale leaseback transactions, and to consolidate, merge or
transfer all, or substantially all, of its assets. The 2021 Notes contain a special mandatory
redemption feature requiring redemption of 50% of the outstanding principal amount if the proposed
acquisition of Ladish is not consummated on or prior to June 30, 2011. The Company has the option
to redeem the 2021 Notes, as a whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, on at least 30
days prior notice to the holders of the 2021 Notes at a redemption price specified in the 2021
Notes. On or after October 15, 2020, the Company may redeem the 2021 Notes at its option, at any
time in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the 2021 Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 2021 Notes are
subject to repurchase upon the occurrence of a change in control repurchase event (as defined in
the 2021 Notes) at a repurchase price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of
the 2021 Notes repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
6
The Company did not borrow funds under its $400 million senior unsecured domestic credit
facility during the first three months of 2011, although approximately $7 million has been utilized
to support the issuance of letters of credit. The unsecured facility requires the Company to
maintain a leverage ratio (consolidated total indebtedness net of cash on hand in excess of $50
million, divided by consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
and non-cash pension expense) of not greater than 3.25, and maintain an interest coverage ratio
(consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, and non-cash pension expense divided by interest
expense) of not less than 2.0. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2011, the leverage ratio was
1.84, and the interest coverage ratio was 4.35.
The Company has an additional separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit.
As of March 31, 2011, $30 million in letters of credit were outstanding under this facility.
In addition, STAL, the Companys Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, has a 205 million renminbi (approximately $31 million at March 31, 2011 exchange rates)
revolving credit facility with a group of banks. This credit facility is supported solely by
STALs financial capability without any guarantees from the joint venture partners. As of March 31,
2011, there were no borrowings under this credit facility.
Note 5. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging
As part of its risk management strategy, the Company, from time-to-time, utilizes derivative
financial instruments to manage its exposure to changes in raw material prices, energy costs,
foreign currencies, and interest rates. In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the
Company accounts for most of these contracts as hedges. In general, hedge effectiveness is
determined by examining the relationship between offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows
attributable to the item being hedged, and the financial instrument being used for the hedge.
Effectiveness is measured utilizing regression analysis and other techniques to determine whether
the change in the fair market value or cash flows of the derivative exceeds the change in fair
value or cash flow of the hedged item. Calculated ineffectiveness, if any, is immediately
recognized on the statement of income.
The Company sometimes uses futures and swap contracts to manage exposure to changes in prices
for forecasted purchases of raw materials, such as nickel and natural gas. Under these contracts,
which are generally accounted for as cash flow hedges, the price of the item being hedged is fixed
at the time that the contract is entered into and the Company is obligated to make or receive a
payment equal to the net change between this fixed price and the market price at the date the
contract matures.
The majority of ATIs products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index
mechanisms. However, as of March 31, 2011, the Company had entered into financial hedging
arrangements primarily at the request of its customers, related to firm orders, representing
approximately 5% of its annual nickel usage, primarily with settlements in 2011. A minor amount of
nickel hedges extend into 2014.
At March 31, 2011, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge the Companys exposure
to energy cost volatility included natural gas cost hedges for approximately 75% of its annual
forecasted domestic requirements through 2011 and approximately 30% for 2012, and electricity
hedges for Western Pennsylvania operations of approximately 45% of its forecasted on-peak and
off-peak requirements for 2011 and approximately 30% for 2012.
While the majority of the Companys direct export sales are transacted in U.S. dollars,
foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit transactional exposure to
changes in currency exchange rates for those transactions denominated in a non-U.S. currency. The
Company sometimes purchases foreign currency forward contracts that permit it to sell specified
amounts of foreign currencies expected to be received from its export sales for pre-established
U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates. The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign
currencies in which export sales are denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the
variability in cash flows of a portion of the forecasted future export sales transactions which
otherwise would expose the Company to foreign currency risk. The Company may also enter into
foreign currency forward contracts that are not designated as hedges, which are denominated in the
same foreign currency in which export sales are denominated. At March 31, 2011, the outstanding
financial derivatives, including both hedges and undesignated derivatives, that are used to manage
the Companys exposure to foreign currency, primarily euros, represented approximately 15% of its
forecasted total international sales through 2012. In addition, the Company may also designate
cash balances held in foreign currencies as hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions.
7
The Company may enter into derivative interest rate contracts to maintain a reasonable balance
between fixed- and floating-rate debt. There were no unsettled derivative financial instruments
related to debt balances for the periods presented, although previously settled contracts remain a
component of the recorded value of debt. See Note 4. Debt, for further information.
The fair values of the Companys derivative financial instruments are presented below. All
fair values for these derivatives were measured using Level 2 information as defined by the
accounting standard hierarchy, which includes quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are
not active, and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Asset derivatives |
|
Balance sheet location |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
Nickel and other raw material contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Nickel and other raw
material contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Electricity contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
Balance sheet location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
Nickel and other raw material contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Electricity contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Electricity contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
|
For derivative financial instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges, the
effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during
which the hedged item affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing
either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness
are recognized in current period results. The Company did not use fair value or net
investment hedges for the periods presented. The effects of derivative instruments in the
tables below are presented net of related income taxes.
Activity with regard to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows (in millions):
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
on Derivatives (Ineffective |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) (a) |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) (b) |
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Hedging Relationships |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Nickel and other raw
material contracts |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity contracts |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(10.5 |
) |
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income related to the
effective portion of the derivatives are presented in cost of sales. |
|
(b) |
|
The gains recognized in income on derivatives related to the ineffective portion and
the amount excluded from effectiveness testing are presented in selling and administrative
expenses. |
Assuming market prices remain constant with those at March 31, 2011, a loss of $10.7 million
is expected to be recognized over the next 12 months.
The disclosures of gains or losses presented above for nickel and other raw material contracts
and foreign currency contracts do not take into account the anticipated underlying transactions.
Since these derivative contracts represent hedges, the net effect of any gain or loss on results of
operations may be fully or partially offset.
Derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
in Income on Derivatives |
|
In millions |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Derivatives Not Designated |
|
March 31, |
|
as Hedging Instruments |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of foreign exchange contract derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments are recorded in cost of sales.
There are no credit risk-related contingent features in the Companys derivative contracts,
and the contracts contained no provisions under which the Company has posted, or would be required
to post, collateral. The counterparties to the Companys derivative contracts were substantial and
creditworthy commercial banks that are recognized market makers. The Company controls its credit
exposure by diversifying across multiple counterparties and by monitoring credit ratings and credit
default swap spreads of its counterparties. The Company also enters into master netting agreements
with counterparties when possible.
9
Note 6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value of financial instruments at March 31, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Active Markets for |
|
Observable |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
816.3 |
|
|
$ |
816.3 |
|
|
$ |
816.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
Debt (a) |
|
|
1,561.9 |
|
|
|
2,006.5 |
|
|
|
1,964.3 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
The estimated fair value of financial instruments at December 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Active Markets for |
|
Observable |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
432.3 |
|
|
$ |
432.3 |
|
|
$ |
432.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
Debt (a) |
|
|
1,063.3 |
|
|
|
1,328.4 |
|
|
|
1,284.9 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fair value adjustments for settled interest rate swap contracts of $0.7 million at
March 31, 2011, and $0.9 million at December 31, 2010. |
In accordance with accounting standards, fair value is defined as the exchange price that
would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Accounting standards established three levels of a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities
to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three
levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing
models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant
unobservable inputs.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of
its financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: Fair value was determined using Level 1 information.
Derivative financial instruments: Fair values for derivatives were measured using
exchange-traded prices for the hedged items. The fair value was determined using Level 2
information, including consideration of counterparty risk and the Companys credit risk.
Short-term and long-term debt: The fair values of the Companys publicly traded debt were
based on Level 1 information. The fair values of the other short-term and long-term debt were
determined using Level 2 information.
10
Note 7. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company has defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans covering
substantially all employees. Benefits under the defined benefit pension plans are generally based
on years of service and/or final average pay. The Company funds the U.S. pension plans in
accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal
Revenue Code.
The Company also sponsors several postretirement plans covering certain salaried and hourly
employees. The plans provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees. In
most plans, Company contributions towards premiums are capped based on the cost as of a certain
date, thereby creating a defined contribution. For the non-collectively bargained plans, the
Company maintains the right to amend or terminate the plans at its discretion.
For the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the components of pension
expense and components of other postretirement benefit expense for the Companys defined benefit
plans included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(45.7 |
) |
|
|
(45.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
$ |
17.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Income Taxes
First quarter 2011 results included a provision for income taxes of $35.1 million,
compared to $13.2 million for the comparable 2010 period. The first quarter 2011 included a
discrete tax charge of $2.7 million primarily related to foreign income taxes. Excluding the tax
charge, the first quarter 2011 effective tax rate was 34.5% of income before tax. The first
quarter 2010 included a non-recurring tax charge of $5.3 million associated with the impact of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The first quarter 2010 tax charge was partially offset
by discrete net tax benefits of $3.7 million associated with the adjustment of taxes paid in prior
years, the settlement of uncertain income tax positions, and other charges.
11
Note 9. Business Segments
Following is certain financial information with respect to the Companys business segments
for the periods indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
433.1 |
|
|
$ |
315.7 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
719.0 |
|
|
|
520.9 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
129.2 |
|
|
|
89.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,281.3 |
|
|
|
926.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
399.4 |
|
|
|
302.3 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
710.6 |
|
|
|
516.6 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
117.4 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,227.4 |
|
|
$ |
899.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
85.6 |
|
|
$ |
55.0 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
63.4 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
|
162.4 |
|
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(25.8 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
Retirement benefit expense |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
93.8 |
|
|
$ |
33.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit expense represents defined benefit plan pension expense, and other
postretirement benefit expense for both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. Operating
profit with respect to the Companys business segments excludes any retirement benefit expense.
Corporate expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $25.8 million, compared to
$12.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in corporate expenses was
primarily related to accelerated recognition of equity-based compensation expenses associated with
previously announced executive retirements, higher incentive compensation expenses associated with
long-term performance plans, costs related to the planned acquisition of Ladish, and
corporate-funded research and development costs.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, primarily includes charges incurred in connection
with closed operations and other non-operating income or expense. These items are presented
primarily in selling and administrative expenses and in other expense in the statement of
operations. These items resulted in net charges of $0.5 million for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and $5.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This decrease was primarily
related to lower expenses at closed operations, and foreign currency remeasurement gains.
12
Note 10. Per Share Information
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share
(in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator for basic net income per common share
Net income attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.25% Convertible Notes due 2014 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income per common share
Net income available to ATI after assumed conversions |
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per
common shareweighted average shares |
|
|
97.6 |
|
|
|
97.4 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
4.25% Convertible Notes due 2014 |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per
common share adjusted weighted average shares
assuming conversions |
|
|
109.0 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income attributable to ATI per common share |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income attributable to ATI per common share |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock that would be issuable upon the assumed conversion of the 2014 Convertible Notes
and other option equivalents and contingently issuable shares were excluded from the computation of
contingently issuable shares, and therefore, from the denominator for diluted earnings per share,
if the effect of inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Excluded shares for the three month
period ended March 31, 2010 were 9.6 million.
Note 11. Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
The payment obligations under the $150 million 6.95% debentures due 2025 issued by Allegheny
Ludlum Corporation (the Subsidiary) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated (the Guarantor Parent). In accordance with positions established by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the following financial information sets forth separately
financial information with respect to the Subsidiary, the non-guarantor subsidiaries and the
Guarantor Parent. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and
certain intercompany balances and transactions. Investments in subsidiaries, which are eliminated
in consolidation, are included in other assets on the balance sheets.
Allegheny Technologies is the plan sponsor for the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan
(the Plan) which covers certain current and former employees of the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries. As a result, the balance sheets presented for the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries do not include any Plan assets or liabilities, or the related deferred
taxes. The Plan assets, liabilities and related deferred taxes and pension income or expense are
recognized by the Guarantor Parent. Management and royalty fees charged to the Subsidiary and to
the non-guarantor subsidiaries by the Guarantor Parent have been excluded solely for purposes of
this presentation.
Cash flows related to intercompany activity between the Guarantor Parent, the Subsidiary, and
the non-guarantor subsidiaries are presented as financing activities on the condensed statements of
cash flows.
13
Note 11. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
278.0 |
|
|
$ |
530.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
816.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
313.7 |
|
|
|
380.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694.0 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
332.9 |
|
|
|
899.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
938.3 |
|
|
|
1,835.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,787.1 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
491.9 |
|
|
|
1,504.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,999.2 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209.1 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries and
other assets |
|
|
4,316.6 |
|
|
|
1,339.0 |
|
|
|
773.7 |
|
|
|
(6,232.2 |
) |
|
|
197.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,333.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,881.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,210.3 |
|
|
$ |
(6,232.2 |
) |
|
$ |
5,192.5 |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
246.5 |
|
|
$ |
254.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
505.2 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
634.3 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
719.9 |
|
|
|
(1,142.7 |
) |
|
|
270.8 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion
of long-term debt |
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
755.7 |
|
|
|
311.1 |
|
|
|
991.3 |
|
|
|
(1,142.7 |
) |
|
|
915.4 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,252.5 |
|
|
|
350.8 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
1,422.5 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
229.7 |
|
|
|
187.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417.6 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.0 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,129.9 |
|
|
|
914.8 |
|
|
|
1,287.4 |
|
|
|
(1,342.7 |
) |
|
|
2,989.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,203.1 |
|
|
|
1,966.6 |
|
|
|
2,922.9 |
|
|
|
(4,889.5 |
) |
|
|
2,203.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
4,333.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,881.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,210.3 |
|
|
$ |
(6,232.2 |
) |
|
$ |
5,192.5 |
|
|
|
|
14
Note 11. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
619.1 |
|
|
$ |
608.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,227.4 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
557.4 |
|
|
|
456.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,022.0 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before interest, other
income and income taxes |
|
|
(51.5 |
) |
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116.7 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
Other income including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
165.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(167.0 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
115.2 |
|
|
|
(167.0 |
) |
|
|
93.8 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
(59.8 |
) |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
(107.2 |
) |
|
|
58.7 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
|
$ |
(104.8 |
) |
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
27.8 |
|
|
$ |
(104.9 |
) |
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
(50.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by
financing activities |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
242.1 |
|
|
|
256.1 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
476.0 |
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
118.9 |
|
|
$ |
259.0 |
|
|
$ |
¯ |
|
|
$ |
384.0 |
|
|
|
|
15
Note 11. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
159.1 |
|
|
$ |
271.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
432.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
233.3 |
|
|
|
312.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545.4 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
232.6 |
|
|
|
791.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024.5 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets |
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
|
644.2 |
|
|
|
1,420.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115.1 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
483.5 |
|
|
|
1,503.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,989.3 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206.8 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries and
other assets |
|
|
4,249.2 |
|
|
|
1,554.2 |
|
|
|
1,001.0 |
|
|
|
(6,622.0 |
) |
|
|
182.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,302.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,794.1 |
|
|
$ |
4,018.9 |
|
|
$ |
(6,622.0 |
) |
|
$ |
4,493.6 |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
173.3 |
|
|
$ |
215.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
394.1 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,179.3 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
704.8 |
|
|
|
(1,697.1 |
) |
|
|
249.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion
of long-term debt |
|
|
117.3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,307.7 |
|
|
|
246.6 |
|
|
|
933.8 |
|
|
|
(1,697.1 |
) |
|
|
791.0 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
752.5 |
|
|
|
350.8 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
921.9 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
236.6 |
|
|
|
187.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423.8 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
68.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,173.2 |
|
|
|
860.2 |
|
|
|
1,227.9 |
|
|
|
(1,897.1 |
) |
|
|
2,364.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,129.4 |
|
|
|
1,933.9 |
|
|
|
2,791.0 |
|
|
|
(4,724.9 |
) |
|
|
2,129.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
4,302.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,794.1 |
|
|
$ |
4,018.9 |
|
|
$ |
(6,622.0 |
) |
|
$ |
4,493.6 |
|
|
|
|
16
Note 11. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
458.8 |
|
|
$ |
440.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
899.4 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
424.5 |
|
|
|
343.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
778.0 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.2 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before interest, other
income and income taxes |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
Other income including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(83.9 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
(83.9 |
) |
|
|
33.0 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
(53.6 |
) |
|
|
19.8 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
(52.0 |
) |
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
$ |
(111.9 |
) |
|
$ |
51.3 |
|
|
$ |
(20.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(72.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in
financing activities |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(154.6 |
) |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(145.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and
regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants and disposal of wastes, and which may require
that it investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites
associated with past and present operations. The Company could incur substantial cleanup costs,
fines, and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims as a
result of violations or liabilities under these laws or noncompliance with environmental permits
required at its facilities. The Company is currently involved in the investigation and remediation
of a number of its current and former sites, as well as third party sites.
Environmental liabilities are recorded when the Companys liability is probable and the costs
are reasonably estimable. In many cases, however, the Company is not able to determine whether it
is liable or, if liability is probable, to reasonably estimate the loss or range of loss. Estimates
of the Companys liability remain subject to additional uncertainties, including the nature and
extent of site contamination, available remediation alternatives, the extent of corrective actions
that may be required, and the number, participation, and financial condition of other
17
potentially responsible parties (PRPs). The Company expects that it will adjust its accruals to
reflect new information as appropriate. Future adjustments could have a material adverse effect on
the Companys results of operations in a given period, but the Company cannot reliably predict the
amounts of such future adjustments.
Based on currently available information, the Company does not believe that there is a
reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding the amount already accrued for any of the sites with
which the Company is currently associated (either individually or in the aggregate) will be an
amount that would be material to a decision to buy or sell the Companys securities. Future
developments, administrative actions or liabilities relating to environmental matters, however,
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
At March 31, 2011, the Companys reserves for environmental remediation obligations totaled
approximately $15 million, of which $6 million was included in other current liabilities. The
reserve includes estimated probable future costs of $6 million for federal Superfund and comparable
state-managed sites; $6 million for formerly owned or operated sites for which the Company has
remediation or indemnification obligations; $2 million for owned or controlled sites at which
Company operations have been discontinued; and $1 million for sites utilized by the Company in its
ongoing operations. The Company continues to evaluate whether it may be able to recover a portion
of future costs for environmental liabilities from third parties.
The timing of expenditures depends on a number of factors that vary by site. The Company
expects that it will expend present accruals over many years and that remediation of all sites with
which it has been identified will be completed within thirty years.
See Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies to the Companys consolidated financial statements
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 for a
discussion of legal proceedings affecting the Company.
A number of other lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the
Company relating to the conduct of its currently and formerly owned businesses, including those
pertaining to product liability, patent infringement, commercial, government contract work,
employment, employee benefits, taxes, environmental, health and safety, occupational disease, and
stockholder matters. While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some
of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to the Company, management
does not believe that the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any
reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations for that period.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Allegheny Technologies is one of the largest and most diversified specialty metals producers in the
world. We use innovative technologies to offer global markets a wide range of specialty metals
solutions. Our products include titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys,
zirconium, hafnium, and niobium, advanced powder alloys, stainless and specialty steel alloys,
grain-oriented electrical steel, tungsten-based materials and cutting tools, carbon alloy
impression die forgings, and large grey and ductile iron castings. Our specialty metals are
produced in a wide range of alloys and product forms and are selected for use in applications that
demand metals having exceptional hardness, toughness, strength, resistance to heat, corrosion or
abrasion, or a combination of these characteristics.
Sales for the first quarter 2011 increased 36% to $1.23 billion, compared to the first quarter
2010, primarily as a result of higher shipments and transactional prices across all our business
segments. Compared to the first quarter 2010, sales increased 32% in the High Performance Metals
segment, 38% in the Flat-Rolled Products segment and 46% in the Engineered Products segment.
Demand from the global aerospace and defense, electrical energy, oil and gas, chemical process
industry, and medical markets accounted for approximately 70% of our sales for the first three
months of 2011. Comparative information on the respective percentages of our overall revenues by
market for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
Market |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Aerospace & Defense |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
Oil & Gas/Chemical Process Industry |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Electrical Energy |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Medical |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Key Markets |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
Construction/Mining |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Food Equipment & Appliances |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Transportation |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Electronics/Computers/Communication |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Machine & Cutting Tools |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Conversion Services & Other |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
For the first three months of 2011, direct international sales were $389.7 million, or 31.8%
of total sales. Sales of our high-value products (titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based
alloys and specialty alloys, exotic alloys, grain-oriented electrical steel, precision and
engineered strip, and tungsten materials) represented 70% of total sales. Titanium product
shipments, including ATI-produced products for our Uniti titanium joint venture, improved to 11.5
million pounds in the first three months of 2011, an increase of 32% compared to the fourth quarter
2010 and an increase of 25% compared to the first quarter of 2010.
Segment operating profit for the first quarter 2011 increased to $162.4 million, or 13.2% of
sales, compared to $88.2 million, or 9.8% of sales, in the first quarter 2010. While operating
profit increased across all three business segments, results for the first quarter 2011 were
negatively impacted by idle facility and start-up costs associated with our titanium sponge
operations of $9.8 million. The start-up costs relate mostly to our Rowley, UT premium-titanium
sponge facility. The facility is now producing sponge at improved volume and yield, so we expect
reduced start-up costs in the second quarter. We expect the Rowley facility to be at a 20 million
pound annualized production rate during the second half of 2011. Idle facility costs relate mostly
to our Albany, OR titanium sponge facility, which is positioned to be back in production when
warranted by market conditions. In addition, the first quarter 2011 included a LIFO inventory
valuation reserve charge of $3.9 million, due primarily to higher titanium and tungsten raw
material costs. There was no change in our LIFO inventory valuation reserve in the first quarter
2010. The first quarter 2011 results included over $26 million in gross cost reductions, before
the effects of inflation.
Segment operating profit as a percentage of sales for the three month periods ended March 31,
2011 and 2010 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
Engineered Products |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Our measure of segment operating profit, which we use to analyze the performance and results
of our business segments, excludes income taxes, corporate expenses, net interest income or
expense, retirement benefit expense, and other costs net of gains on asset sales. We believe
segment operating profit, as defined, provides an appropriate measure of controllable operating
results at the business segment level.
Income before tax for the first quarter 2011 was $93.8 million, or 7.6% of sales, compared to
$33.0 million for the first quarter 2010. Income before tax for the first quarter 2011 benefited
from decreased retirement benefit expenses of $3.2 million due to higher than expected returns on
pension plan assets in 2010 and the benefits
19
resulting from our voluntary pension contributions over the past several years. However,
interest expense, net of interest income, increased by $8.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011, to $23.0 million, primarily due to the January 7, 2011 issuance of $500 million,
5.95% Notes due 2021, and lower interest expense capitalized on strategic projects due to project
completions. Results for 2011 also included a charge of $4.8 million ($3.1 million, net of tax)
related to the accelerated recognition of equity-based compensation expense due to previously
announced executive retirements.
Net income attributable to ATI for the first quarter 2011 was $56.3 million, or $0.54 per
share, compared to $18.2 million, or $0.18 per share for the first quarter 2010. Special charges
for the first quarter 2011 were $5.8 million, or $0.05 per share, due to previously announced
executive retirements and a $2.7 million discrete tax charge primarily related to foreign taxes.
Excluding these charges, net income attributable to ATI for the first quarter 2011 was $62.1
million, or $0.59 per share. Results for the first quarter 2010 included a non-recurring tax
charge of $5.3 million related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Excluding this
tax charge, net income attributable to ATI for the first quarter 2010 was $23.5 million, or $0.24
per share.
At March 31, 2011, we had cash on hand of $816.3 million, representing an increase of $384.0
million from year-end 2010. This increase was primarily due to the January 2011 $500 million,
5.95% Note issuance. Cash flow used in operations for the first quarter 2011 was $50.3 million.
An investment of $245.9 million in managed working capital, due to a significant increase in the
level of business activity and higher raw material costs, offset increased profitability. Net debt
to total capitalization was 26.1% and total debt to total capitalization was 42.5% at March 31,
2011.
High Performance Metals segment backlog at the end of the first quarter 2011 was over $742
million, and is approaching levels reached in early 2007 and 2008. In addition, as the chosen
supplier to several large projects in the oil and gas/chemical process industry, we have a
significant backlog for 2011 in our Flat-Rolled Products segment.
At 23% of ATI sales, our sales to the oil and gas/chemical process industry grew by 51%
compared to the same period last year. ATI is seeing a step up in demand and has won supply
agreements for major projects including CP titanium for the largest desalination plant ever built,
nickel-based alloy plate for the largest sour gas pipeline ever built, and specialty sheet for a
large subsea oil pipeline being built in Brazil.
At 6% of first quarter 2011 sales, Medical was again our fastest growing market. Sales to the
medical market doubled compared to the first quarter 2010. Growth was driven by demand for
titanium products used in biomedical applications, and demand for our products used in
next-generation MRI devices and for expanded MRI sales into developing countries.
We expect to see higher base prices for some of our products going forward. In our
Flat-Rolled Products segment two base-price increases have been announced for our nickel-based
alloy and specialty alloy products and a base-price increase was
announced for certain of our standard
stainless products. Base prices have also been improving for our High Performance Metals segment
titanium alloy and nickel-based alloy and specialty alloys. In addition, base-prices are improving
in our Engineered Products segment, particularly for our tungsten products and for our carbon steel
alloy forgings.
We continue to expect 2011 revenue growth of 15% to 20% compared to 2010, and continue to
expect segment operating profit to be approximately 15% of sales for the year. Strength in our key
markets, improving shipments and improving base prices for most products, and our ongoing focus on
cost reduction and operating execution gives us confidence that these goals can be achieved.
Our outlook does not include any impact from our pending acquisition of Ladish Co., Inc. The
meeting of Ladish shareholders to consider the acquisition is planned for May 6, 2011. Assuming
shareholder approval, the acquisition is expected to close shortly after the meeting. ATI expects
to recognize non-recurring transaction costs of approximately $8 million, pretax, during the second
quarter 2011. In addition, due to acquisition accounting we presently do not expect significant
additional operating profit in the second quarter from sales attributable to Ladish.
Business Segment Results
We operate in three business segments: High Performance Metals, Flat-Rolled Products, and
Engineered Products. These segments represented the following percentages of our total revenues and
segment operating profit for the first three months of 2011 and 2010:
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
Engineered Products |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
High Performance Metals Segment
First quarter 2011 sales increased 32% to $399.4 million compared to first quarter 2010. Shipments
increased 11% for titanium and titanium alloys and 40% for nickel-based and specialty alloys,
primarily due to improved demand from the commercial aerospace market. Shipments of exotic alloys
increased 10% primarily due to improved demand from the medical market and other superconductivity
applications. Average selling prices increased 13% for titanium and titanium alloys and 10% for
nickel-based and specialty alloys due to higher raw material indices and improved base selling
prices. Average selling prices for exotic alloys increased 1%.
Comparative information on the respective percentages of the segments overall revenues from
the segments markets for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
Market |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Aerospace: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jet Engines |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
Airframes |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
Government |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Aerospace |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Oil & Gas/Chemical Process Industry |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Electrical Energy |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Medical |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Other |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Segment operating profit in the 2011 first quarter increased to $85.6 million, or 21.4% of
sales, compared to $55.0 million, or 18.2% of sales, for the first quarter 2010. The increase in
operating profit primarily resulted from higher shipment volumes, improved product pricing, and the
benefits of gross cost reductions. First quarter 2011 operating profit was adversely affected by
approximately $10.2 million of start-up and idle facility costs, mainly involving the titanium
sponge operations. The first quarter 2010 included $9.9 million of idle facility, workforce
reduction, and start-up costs. In addition, segment operating profit included a LIFO inventory
valuation reserve charge of $4.2 million. There was no change in the LIFO inventory valuation
reserve in the first quarter 2010. Results benefitted from $12 million in gross cost reductions in
the first quarter 2011.
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 is provided in the following table:
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
6,753 |
|
|
|
6,098 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
11,824 |
|
|
|
8,444 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
21.25 |
|
|
$ |
18.82 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
14.86 |
|
|
$ |
13.53 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
61.18 |
|
|
$ |
60.81 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Flat-Rolled Products Segment
First quarter 2011 sales increased to $710.6 million, 37.6% higher than the first quarter 2010,
primarily due to higher shipments and raw material surcharges, and improved base-selling prices for
certain products. Shipments of high value products increased 10% and standard stainless products
(sheet and plate) increased 9%. Average transaction prices for all products, which include
surcharges, were 26% higher due to increased raw material surcharges for all products and improved
base prices for most high value products due to strengthening market conditions.
Comparative information on the respective percentages of the segments overall revenues from
the segments markets during the first three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
Market |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Oil & Gas/Chemical Process Industry |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
Electrical Energy |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
Automotive |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Food Equipment & Appliances |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Construction/Mining |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Aerospace & Defense |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Electronics/Computers/Communication |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Medical |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Other |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Segment operating profit improved to $63.4 million, or 8.9% of sales, compared to $31.4, or
6.1% of sales, for the first quarter 2010 due primarily to increased shipments and higher base
prices for certain products plus a better matching of surcharges with raw material costs. First
quarter 2011 also included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $2.5 million. There was no
change in the LIFO inventory valuation reserve in the first quarter 2010. Segment results for the
2011 period benefited from $10.3 million in gross cost reductions.
Comparative information on the segments products for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010 is provided in the following table:
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
122,027 |
|
|
|
110,495 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Standard |
|
|
170,328 |
|
|
|
156,851 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
292,355 |
|
|
|
267,346 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
3.19 |
|
|
$ |
2.59 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Standard |
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
2.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.92 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Engineered Products Segment
Sales for the first quarter of 2011 were $117.4 million, an increase of 45.8% compared to the first
quarter 2010. Demand continued to improve from the oil and gas, cutting tools, transportation,
aerospace, electrical energy, and automotive markets. Comparative information on the respective
percentages of the segments overall revenues from the segments markets during the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
Market |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Oil & Gas/Chemical Process Industry |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
Transportation |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Machine & Cutting Tools |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
Construction/Mining |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Electrical Energy |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Aerospace & Defense |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Automotive |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Medical |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Segment operating profit for the 2011 first quarter was $13.4 million, compared to $1.8 million in
the first quarter 2010. The increase in segment operating profit resulted from improved demand and
higher prices for tungsten-based and carbon alloy forging products, combined with the benefits of
$4 million in gross cost reductions. Results for the 2011 first quarter included a LIFO inventory
valuation reserve charge of $2.2 million. There was no change in our LIFO inventory valuation
reserve in the first quarter 2010.
Corporate Items
Corporate expenses for the first quarter 2011 were $25.8 million, compared to $12.3 million in the
year-ago period. The increase in corporate expenses was primarily related to accelerated
recognition of equity-based compensation expense due to previously announced executive retirements,
higher incentive compensation expenses associated with long-term performance plans, costs related
to the planned acquisition of Ladish, and corporate-funded research and development costs.
Interest expense, net of interest income, in the first quarter 2010 was $23.0 million,
compared to interest expense of $14.6 million in the first quarter 2010. The increase in interest
expense was primarily due to the January 7, 2011 issuance of $500 million of 5.95% Notes due 2021,
and lower capitalized interest on strategic projects due to project completions. Interest expense
benefited from the capitalization of interest costs on strategic capital projects of $2.6 million
in the first three months of 2011 and by $4.0 million in the first three months of 2010.
Other expenses, which include charges incurred in connection with closed operations, and other
non-operating income or expense, for the first quarter 2011 was $0.5 million, compared to $5.8
million for the first quarter 2010.
23
The decrease was primarily related to lower expenses associated with closed operations and foreign
exchange gains. These items are presented primarily in selling and administration expenses, and in
other income in the statement of operations.
Retirement benefit expense, which includes pension expense and other postretirement expense,
decreased to $19.3 million in the first quarter 2011, compared to $22.5 million in the first
quarter 2010. For the first quarter 2011, retirement benefit expense of $13.8 million was included
in cost of sales and $5.5 million was included in selling and administrative expenses. For the
first quarter 2010, the amount of retirement benefit expense included in cost of sales was $15.8
million, and the amount included in selling and administrative expenses was $6.7 million. The
decrease in retirement benefit expense for 2011 was primarily due to higher than expected returns
on pension plan assets in 2010 and the benefits resulting from our voluntary pension contributions
made over the last several years.
Income Taxes
First quarter 2011 results included a provision for income taxes of $35.1 million, or 37.4% of
income before tax, compared to an income tax provision of $13.2 million, or 40.0% of income before
tax for the comparable 2010 period. The first quarter 2011 included discrete tax charges of $2.7
million primarily related to foreign taxes. Excluding these items, the effective tax rate was
34.5%. The first quarter 2010 included a non-recurring tax charge of $5.3 million associated with
the impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The change in law resulted in a
reduction of the value of the Companys deferred tax asset related to the subsidy. This 2010 first
quarter tax charge was partially offset by discrete net tax benefits of $3.7 million associated
with adjustment of taxes paid in prior years and other changes.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
On January 7, 2011, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of $5.95% Senior Notes due
2021. During the second quarter 2011, we are anticipating using approximately $395 million of cash
on hand to fund the cash portion of the merger consideration for the previously announced
acquisition of Ladish and pay related fees and expenses.
We believe that internally generated funds, current cash on hand, and available borrowings
under existing credit lines will be adequate to meet foreseeable liquidity needs, including a
substantial expansion of our production capabilities over the next few years, and scheduled debt
maturities. We did not borrow funds under our domestic senior unsecured credit facility during the
first three months of 2011. However, as of March 31, 2011, approximately $7 million of this
facility was utilized to support letters of credit.
If we needed to obtain additional financing using the credit markets, the cost and the terms
and conditions of such borrowings may be influenced by our credit rating. Changes in our credit
rating do not impact our access to, or the cost of, our existing credit facilities.
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Cash Flow and Working Capital
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, cash flow used in operations for 2011 was $50.3 million.
An investment of $245.9 million in managed working capital, due to a significant increase in the
level of business activity and higher raw material costs, offset increased profitability. Cash
used in investing activities was $41.7 million in the three months of 2011 and consisted primarily
of capital expenditures. Cash provided by in financing activities was $476.0 million in the first
three months of 2011. The first quarter 2011 included $495 million in net proceeds from
the issuance of $500 million of 5.95% Notes due January 2021, and dividend payments of $17.6
million and $2.0 million in net debt retirements. At March 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents on
hand totaled $816.3 million, an increase of $432.3 million from year end 2010.
As part of managing the liquidity of our business, we focus on controlling managed working
capital, which is defined as gross accounts receivable and gross inventories, less accounts
payable. In measuring performance in controlling this managed working capital, we exclude the
effects of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, excess and obsolete inventory reserves, and reserves
for uncollectible accounts receivable which, due to their nature, are managed separately. At March
31, 2011, managed working capital decreased to 32.1% of annualized sales, compared
24
to 34.4% of annualized sales at December 31, 2010. During the first three months of 2011, managed
working capital increased by $245.9 million, to $1.6 billion. The increase in managed working
capital from December 31, 2010 was due to increased accounts receivable of $147.5 million and
increased inventory of $210.6 million, partially offset by increased accounts payable of $112.2
million. While accounts receivable balances increased during 2011, days sales outstanding, which
measures actual collection timing for accounts receivable, improved when compared to year end 2010.
Gross inventory turns, which excludes the effect of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, were
unchanged when compared to year end 2010.
The Components of managed working capital were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
694.0 |
|
|
$ |
545.4 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,231.9 |
|
|
|
1,024.5 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(505.2 |
) |
|
|
(394.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,420.7 |
|
|
|
1,175.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
LIFO reserve |
|
|
166.9 |
|
|
|
163.0 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital |
|
|
1,625.6 |
|
|
|
1,379.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized prior 2 months sales |
|
$ |
5,070.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,007.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital as a % of annualized sales |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
34.4 |
% |
Change in managed working capital from December
31, 2010 |
|
$ |
245.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
We have significantly expanded, and continue to expand, our manufacturing capabilities to meet
expected intermediate and long-term increased demand from the aerospace (engine and airframe) and
defense, chemical process industry, oil and gas, electrical energy, and medical markets, especially
for titanium and titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, specialty alloys, and
exotic alloys. We currently expect capital expenditures for 2011 will be between $300 and $350
million, of which $42.2 million was expended in the first three months of 2011. These self-funded
on-going strategic capital investments include a new advanced specialty metals hot-rolling and
processing facility at our existing Brackenridge, PA site. The project is estimated to cost
approximately $1.1 billion and be completed by the end of 2013. Equipment orders have been placed,
with engineering and site preparation for the facility progressing. Our new advanced hot-rolling
and processing facility is designed to be the most powerful mill in the world for production of
specialty metals. It is designed to produce exceptional quality, thinner, and wider hot-rolled
coils at reduced cost with shorter lead times, and require lower working capital requirements. When
completed, we believe ATIs new advanced specialty metals hot-rolling and processing facility will
provide unsurpassed manufacturing capability and versatility in the production of a wide range of
flat-rolled specialty metals. We expect improved productivity, lower costs, and higher quality for
our diversified product mix of flat-rolled specialty metals, including nickel-based and specialty
alloys, titanium and titanium alloys, zirconium alloys, Precision Rolled Strip® products, and
stainless sheet and coiled plate products. It is designed to roll and process exceptional quality
hot bands of up to 78.62 inches, or 2 meters, wide.
Debt
At March 31, 2011, we had $1,561.9 million in total outstanding debt, compared to $1,063.3 million
at December 31, 2010, an increase of $498.6 million. The increase in debt was primarily due to the
January 2011 issuance of $500 million of 5.95% Senior Notes due in 2021. The 2021 Notes pay
interest semi-annually in arrears at a rate of 5.95% per year and mature on January 15, 2021,
unless earlier repurchased.
In managing our overall capital structure, some of the measures on which we focus are net debt
to total capitalization, which is the percentage of our debt, net of cash that may be available to
reduce borrowings, to our total invested and borrowed capital, and total debt to total
capitalization, which excludes cash balances. Net debt as
25
a percentage of total capitalization was 26.1% at March 31, 2011, compared to 23.6% at
December 31, 2010. The net debt to total capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,561.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,063.3 |
|
Less: Cash |
|
|
(816.3 |
) |
|
|
(432.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
745.6 |
|
|
$ |
631.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
745.6 |
|
|
$ |
631.0 |
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
2,110.5 |
|
|
|
2,040.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net ATI total capital |
|
$ |
2,856.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,671.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt to ATI total capital |
|
|
26.1 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total capitalization increased to 42.5% at March 31, 2011 from 34.3%
December 31, 2010.
Total debt to total capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,561.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,063.3 |
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
2,110.5 |
|
|
|
2,040.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI capital |
|
$ |
3,672.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,104.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total ATI capital |
|
|
42.5 |
% |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We did not borrow funds under our $400 million senior unsecured domestic credit facility
during the first three months of 2011, although approximately $7 million has been utilized to
support the issuance of letters of credit. The unsecured facility requires us to maintain a
leverage ratio (consolidated total indebtedness net of cash on hand in excess of $50 million,
divided by consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and
non-cash pension expense) of not greater than 3.25, and maintain an interest coverage ratio
(consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, and non-cash pension expense divided by interest
expense) of not less than 2.0. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2011, our leverage ratio was
1.84, and our interest coverage ratio was 4.35.
We have an additional, separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit. As of
March 31, 2011, $30 million in letters of credit was outstanding under this facility.
In addition, STAL, the Companys Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, has a 205 million renminbi (approximately $31 million at March 31, 2011 exchange rates)
revolving credit facility with a group of banks. This credit facility is supported solely by
STALs financial capability without any guarantees from the joint venture partners. As of March 31,
2011, there were no borrowings under this credit facility.
Retirement Benefits
At December 31, 2010, the measurement date for ERISA funding, our U.S. qualified pension
defined benefit pension plan was essentially fully-funded. Based upon current regulations and
actuarial studies, we are not required to make a cash contribution for 2011. However, we may
elect, depending upon investment performance of the pension plan assets and other factors, to make
additional voluntary cash contributions to this plan in the future.
Dividends
A regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock was declared on February 26,
2011, and paid on March 29, 2011 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 11,
2011. In addition, a regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock was declared
on April 29, 2011, payable on June 17, 2011 to stockholders of record at the close of business on
May 26, 2011. The payment of dividends and the amount of such dividends depends upon matters deemed
relevant by our Board of Directors, such as our results of operations,
26
financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects, any limitations imposed by law, credit
agreements or senior securities, and other factors deemed relevant and appropriate.
Critical Accounting Policies
Inventory
At March 31, 2011, we had net inventory of $1,231.9 million. Inventories are stated at the lower of
cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods) or market,
less progress payments. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable manufacturing
and engineering overhead, and other direct costs. Most of our inventory is valued utilizing the
LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of our non-U.S. operations is valued using average cost or FIFO
methods. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw materials and
production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even though these
material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due to the length
of time of our production cycle. The prices for many of the raw materials we use have been
extremely volatile during the past four years. Since we value most of our inventory utilizing the
LIFO inventory costing methodology, a rise in raw material costs has a negative effect on our
operating results, while, conversely, a fall in material costs results in a benefit to operating
results. For example, in 2010, the effect of rising raw material costs on our LIFO inventory
valuation method resulted in cost of sales which were $60.2 million higher than would have been
recognized had we utilized the FIFO methodology to value our inventory. However, in 2009 and 2008,
the effect of falling raw material costs on our LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in cost of
sales which were $102.8 million and $169.0 million lower than would have been recognized had we
utilized the FIFO methodology to value our inventory. In a period of rising prices, cost of sales
expense recognized under LIFO is generally higher than the cash costs incurred to acquire the
inventory sold. Conversely, in a period of declining raw material prices, cost of sales recognized
under LIFO is generally lower than cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold.
Since the LIFO inventory valuation methodology is designed for annual determination, interim
estimates of the annual LIFO valuation are required. We recognize the effects of the LIFO
inventory valuation method on an interim basis by projecting the expected annual LIFO cost and
allocating that projection to the interim quarters equally. These projections of annual LIFO
inventory valuation reserve changes are updated quarterly and are evaluated based upon material,
labor and overhead costs and projections for such costs at the end of the year plus projections
regarding year-end inventory levels. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2011
included LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $3.9 million primarily as a result higher
titanium and tungsten raw material costs.
The LIFO inventory valuation methodology is not utilized by many of the companies with which
we compete, including foreign competitors. As such, our results of operations may not be comparable
to those of our competitors during periods of volatile material costs due, in part, to the
differences between the LIFO inventory valuation method and other acceptable inventory valuation
methods.
We evaluate product lines on a quarterly basis to identify inventory values that exceed
estimated net realizable value. The calculation of a resulting reserve, if any, is recognized as an
expense in the period that the need for the reserve is identified. At March 31, 2011, no
significant reserves were required. It is our general policy to write-down to scrap value any
inventory that is identified as obsolete and any inventory that has aged or has not moved in more
than twelve months. In some instances this criterion is up to twenty-four months due to the longer
manufacturing and distribution process for such products.
Other Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of other significant accounting policies is discussed in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010.
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding
uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Significant areas of
uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for
derivatives, retirement plans, income taxes, environmental and other contingencies as well as asset
impairment, inventory valuation and collectability of accounts receivable. We use historical and
other information that we consider to be relevant to make these judgments and estimates. However,
actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare our
financial statements.
27
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
On January 1, 2011, we prospectively adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) to revenue recognition for multiple-deliverable arrangements. These changes
affect the accounting and reporting of revenues related to bundled sale arrangements with customers
to provide multiple products and services at different points in time or over different time
periods. The adoption of these changes had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2011, we adopted changes issued by the FASB to disclosure requirements for
disaggregated disclosure of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, which
are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. These changes had no impact on the March
31, 2011 consolidated financial statement or footnotes, but will further enhance the fair value
disclosures within the December 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements.
Forward-Looking and Other Statements
From time to time, we have made and may continue to make forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements in this report
relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as anticipates, believes,
estimates, expects, would, should, will, will likely result, forecast, outlook,
projects, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on managements current
expectations and include known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which we
are unable to predict or control, that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to
materially differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements include: (a) material adverse changes in economic or industry conditions generally, and
global supply and demand conditions and prices for our specialty metals; (b) material adverse
changes in the markets we serve, including the aerospace and defense, electrical energy, chemical
process industry, oil and gas, medical, automotive, construction and mining, and other markets; (c)
our inability to achieve the level of cost savings, productivity improvements, synergies, growth or
other benefits anticipated by management, including those anticipated from our proposed Ladish
acquisition and other strategic investments and the integration of acquired businesses, whether due
to significant increases in energy, raw materials or employee benefits costs, the possibility of
project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, or other factors; (d) volatility of
prices and availability of supply of the raw materials that are critical to the manufacture of our
products; (e) declines in the value of our defined benefit pension plan assets or unfavorable
changes in laws or regulations that govern pension plan funding; (f) significant legal proceedings
or investigations adverse to us; and (g) other risk factors summarized in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and in other reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. We assume no duty to update our forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As part of our risk management strategy, we utilize derivative financial instruments, from
time to time, to hedge our exposure to changes in raw material prices, energy prices, foreign
currencies, and interest rates. We monitor the third-party financial institutions which are our
counterparty to these financial instruments on a daily basis and diversify our transactions among
counterparties to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. Fair values for derivatives were
measured using exchange-traded prices for the hedged items including consideration of counterparty
risk and the Companys credit risk.
Interest Rate Risk. We attempt to maintain a reasonable balance between fixed- and floating-rate
debt to keep financing costs as low as possible. At March 31, 2011, we had approximately $35
million of floating rate debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of approximately
1.3%. Approximately $5 million of this floating rate debt is capped at a 6% maximum interest rate.
Since the interest rate on floating rate debt changes with the short-term market rate of interest,
we are exposed to the risk that these interest rates may increase, raising our interest expense in
situations where the interest rate is not capped. For example, a hypothetical 1% increase in the
rate of interest on the $30 million of our outstanding floating rate debt not subjected to a cap
would result in increased annual financing costs of approximately $0.3 million.
Volatility of Energy Prices. Energy resources markets are subject to conditions that create
uncertainty in the prices and availability of energy resources. The prices for and availability of
electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions.
These market conditions often are affected by political and
28
economic factors beyond our control. Increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to
energy costs paid by competitors, have and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To
the extent that these uncertainties cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive,
increased energy prices may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition. We use approximately 8 to 10 million MMBtus of natural gas annually, depending upon
business conditions, in the manufacture of our products. These purchases of natural gas expose us
to risk of higher gas prices. For example, a hypothetical $1.00 per MMBtu increase in the price of
natural gas would result in increased annual energy costs of approximately $8 to $10 million. We
use several approaches to minimize any material adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations from volatile energy prices. These approaches include incorporating an energy
surcharge on many of our products and using financial derivatives to reduce exposure to energy
price volatility.
At March 31, 2011, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our exposure to energy cost
volatility included both natural gas and electricity hedges. For natural gas, approximately 75% of
our forecasted domestic requirements are hedged through 2011, and about 30% of our domestic
requirements are hedged for 2012. The net mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding natural
gas hedges at March 31, 2011 was an unrealized pre-tax loss of $12.8 million, comprised of $0.1
million included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, $0.1 million in other assets, $12.3
million in accrued liabilities, and $0.7 million in other long-term liabilities on the balance
sheet. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the effects of natural gas hedging activity increased
cost of sales by $3.0 million. For electricity usage in our Western Pennsylvania operations, we
have hedged approximately 45% of our on-peak and off-peak forecasted requirements for 2011 and
approximately 30% for 2012. The net mark-to-market valuation of the electricity hedges was an
unrealized pre-tax loss of $0.7 million, comprised of $0.2 million included in prepaid expenses and
other current assets, $0.2 million in other long-term assets, $0.8 million in accrued liabilities,
and $0.3 million in other long-term liabilities on the balance sheet. The effects of the hedging
activity will be recognized in income over the designated hedge periods.
Volatility of Raw Material Prices. We use raw materials surcharge and index mechanisms to offset
the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors in the marketplace can
limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay between the increase in
the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such mechanisms. For example, in
2010 we used approximately 95 million pounds of nickel; therefore a
hypothetical change of $1.00 per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of
approximately $95 million. In addition, in 2010 we also used approximately 780 million pounds of
ferrous scrap in the production of our flat-rolled products and a hypothetical change of $0.01 per
pound would result in increased costs of approximately $8 million. While we enter into raw
materials futures contracts from time-to-time to hedge exposure to price fluctuations, such as for
nickel, we cannot be certain that our hedge position adequately reduces exposure. We believe that
we have adequate controls to monitor these contracts, but we may not be able to accurately assess
exposure to price volatility in the markets for critical raw materials.
The majority of our products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index mechanisms.
However as of March 31, 2011, we had entered into financial hedging arrangements primarily at the
request of our customers related to firm orders for approximately 5% of our total annual nickel
requirements, primarily with settlements in 2011. A minor amount of nickel hedges extend into
2014. Any gain or loss associated with these hedging arrangements is included in cost of sales.
At March 31, 2011, the net mark-to-market valuation of our outstanding raw material hedges was an
unrealized pre-tax gain of $1.8 million, comprised of $2.2 million included in prepaid expenses and
other current assets, $0.8 million in other long-term assets, and $1.2 million in accrued
liabilities on the balance sheet.
Foreign Currency Risk. Foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit
transactional exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. We sometimes purchase foreign
currency forward contracts that permit us to sell specified amounts of foreign currencies expected
to be received from our export sales for pre-established U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates.
The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign currencies in which export sales are
denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows of a portion
of the forecasted future export sales transactions which otherwise would expose the Company to
foreign currency risk. We may also enter into foreign currency forward contracts that are not
designated as hedges, which are denominated in the same foreign currency in which export sales are
denominated. At March 31, 2011, the outstanding financial derivatives, including both hedges and
undesignated derivatives, that are used to manage our exposure to foreign currency, primarily
euros, represented approximately 15% of our forecasted total international sales through 2011. In
addition, we may also designate cash balances held in foreign currencies as hedges of forecasted
foreign currency transactions. At March 31, 2011, the net mark-to-market valuation of the
outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was a net liability of $8.9 million, of which $1.9
million is included in prepaid
29
expenses and other current assets, $7.1 million in accrued liabilities, and $3.7 million in other
long-term liabilities on the balance sheet.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of March 31, 2011, and they concluded that these disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection
with the evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of March
31, 2011, conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, that occurred
during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A number of lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the Company
relating to the conduct of its business, including those pertaining to product liability, patent
infringement, commercial, government contract work, employment, employee benefits, taxes,
environmental, health and safety, occupational disease, and stockholder matters. Certain of such
lawsuits, claims and proceedings are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010, and addressed in Note 12 to the unaudited interim financial statements included
herein. While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these
lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not
believe that the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting
period of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations for that period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
ATIs Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500 million on November 1,
2007. Repurchases of Company common stock are made in the open market or in unsolicited or
privately negotiated transactions. Share repurchases are funded from internal cash flow and cash on
hand. The number of shares purchased, and the timing of the purchases, are based on several
factors, including other investment opportunities, the level of cash balances, and general business
conditions. No shares of common stock were purchased during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
As of March 31, 2011, 6,837,000 shares of common stock had been purchased under this program at a
cost of $339.5 million.
Set forth below is information regarding the Companys stock repurchases during the period
covered by this report, comprising shares repurchased by ATI from employees to satisfy
employee-owed taxes on share-based compensation.
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Purchased as Part |
|
Value) of Shares (or |
|
|
of Shares (or |
|
Price Paid |
|
of Publicly |
|
Units) that May Yet Be |
|
|
Units) |
|
per Share (or |
|
Announced Plans |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Unit) |
|
or Programs |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
January 1-31, 2011 |
|
|
20,905 |
|
|
$ |
64.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160,505,939 |
|
February 1-28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939 |
|
March 1-31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
20,905 |
|
|
$ |
64.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160,505,939 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
2011 Annual Incentive Plan (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Performance/Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 24, 2011
(filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Form of Total Shareholder Return Incentive Compensation Program Award
Agreement effective as of January 1, 2011 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Key Executive Performance Plan Agreement dated February 24,
2011, including Key Executive Performance Plan, as amended February 24, 2011 (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Third Amendment to Credit
Agreement, dated March 11, 2011, by and among
ATI Funding Corporation, TDY Holdings, LLC, the guarantors party thereto, the
lenders party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent
for the lenders (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Consulting and Noncompetition Agreement between Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and L. Patrick Hassey, dated as of May 1, 2011 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Consulting and Noncompetition Agreement between Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and Jon D. Walton, dated as of May 1, 2011 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 5, 2011 |
By |
/s/ Dale G. Reid
|
|
|
|
Dale G. Reid |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 5, 2011 |
By |
/s/ Karl D. Schwartz
|
|
|
|
Karl D. Schwartz |
|
|
|
Controller and
Principal Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
32
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
2011 Annual Incentive Plan (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Performance/Restricted Stock Agreement dated February 24, 2011
(filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Form of Total Shareholder Return Incentive Compensation Program Award
Agreement effective as of January 1, 2011 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Key Executive Performance Plan Agreement dated February 24,
2011, including Key Executive Performance Plan, as amended February 24, 2011 (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Third Amendment to Credit
Agreement, dated March 11, 2011, by and among
ATI Funding Corporation, TDY Holdings, LLC, the guarantors party thereto, the
lenders party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent
for the lenders (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Consulting and Noncompetition Agreement between Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and L. Patrick Hassey, dated as of May 1, 2011 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Consulting and Noncompetition Agreement between Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and Jon D. Walton, dated as of May 1, 2011 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
33