e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ________________ to ________________
Commission file number: 001-31775
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
86-1062192 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(IRS employer identification number) |
|
|
|
14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1100
Dallas, Texas
|
|
75254 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(972) 490-9600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share |
|
68,030,940 |
|
|
|
(Class)
|
|
Outstanding at August 5, 2011 |
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
2,983,582 |
|
|
$ |
3,023,736 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
154,221 |
|
|
|
217,690 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
74,257 |
|
|
|
67,666 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $191 and $298, respectively |
|
|
39,758 |
|
|
|
27,493 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
20,870 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
190,824 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
10,032 |
|
|
|
144,511 |
|
Deferred costs, net |
|
|
16,883 |
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
15,134 |
|
|
|
12,727 |
|
Interest rate derivatives |
|
|
72,327 |
|
|
|
106,867 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
7,502 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
2,854 |
|
|
|
2,899 |
|
Due from third-party hotel managers |
|
|
55,248 |
|
|
|
49,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,624,834 |
|
|
$ |
3,716,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indebtedness |
|
$ |
2,445,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,518,164 |
|
Indebtedness of assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,619 |
|
Capital leases payable |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
86,663 |
|
|
|
79,248 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
15,165 |
|
|
|
7,281 |
|
Unfavorable management contract liabilities |
|
|
14,928 |
|
|
|
16,058 |
|
Due to related party |
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Due to third-party hotel managers |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
4,627 |
|
Other liabilities of assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,570,685 |
|
|
|
2,683,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, Series B-1 Cumulative Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock, 7,247,865 shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,986 |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership |
|
|
163,021 |
|
|
|
126,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity of the Company: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock, 1,487,900 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Series D Cumulative Preferred Stock, 8,966,797 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Series E Cumulative Preferred Stock, 3,350,000 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized,
124,896,765 and 122,403,893 shares issued at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010; 61,030,940 and 58,999,324 shares outstanding
at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,654,956 |
|
|
|
1,552,657 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(589,434 |
) |
|
|
(543,788 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 63,865,825 and 64,404,569 shares at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(190,650 |
) |
|
|
(192,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity of the Company |
|
|
875,973 |
|
|
|
816,808 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated joint ventures |
|
|
15,155 |
|
|
|
16,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
891,128 |
|
|
|
833,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
3,624,834 |
|
|
$ |
3,716,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
ASHFORD HOSPITAL ITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms |
|
$ |
177,040 |
|
|
$ |
164,762 |
|
|
$ |
339,789 |
|
|
$ |
315,820 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
41,242 |
|
|
|
40,817 |
|
|
|
79,649 |
|
|
|
76,986 |
|
Rental income from operating leases |
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,253 |
|
|
|
10,122 |
|
|
|
19,599 |
|
|
|
19,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel revenue |
|
|
230,019 |
|
|
|
217,155 |
|
|
|
441,741 |
|
|
|
415,272 |
|
Interest income from notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683 |
|
Asset management fees and other |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
230,099 |
|
|
|
217,639 |
|
|
|
441,889 |
|
|
|
416,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms |
|
|
39,205 |
|
|
|
36,716 |
|
|
|
76,251 |
|
|
|
71,215 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
27,121 |
|
|
|
27,119 |
|
|
|
53,602 |
|
|
|
52,601 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
68,928 |
|
|
|
68,091 |
|
|
|
134,402 |
|
|
|
130,529 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
9,184 |
|
|
|
8,834 |
|
|
|
18,043 |
|
|
|
17,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
|
144,438 |
|
|
|
140,760 |
|
|
|
282,298 |
|
|
|
271,511 |
|
Property taxes, insurance and other |
|
|
11,769 |
|
|
|
12,313 |
|
|
|
22,656 |
|
|
|
25,390 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,027 |
|
|
|
32,906 |
|
|
|
65,804 |
|
|
|
66,749 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
(4,316 |
) |
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
|
|
(4,656 |
) |
|
|
(1,957 |
) |
Gain on insurance settlement |
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transaction acquisition costs |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Corporate general and administrative |
|
|
11,005 |
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
24,888 |
|
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
194,424 |
|
|
|
193,114 |
|
|
|
388,267 |
|
|
|
376,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
35,675 |
|
|
|
24,525 |
|
|
|
53,622 |
|
|
|
39,493 |
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(2,301 |
) |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
25,824 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Other income |
|
|
18,157 |
|
|
|
15,652 |
|
|
|
66,160 |
|
|
|
31,171 |
|
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs |
|
|
(34,808 |
) |
|
|
(35,321 |
) |
|
|
(69,386 |
) |
|
|
(70,385 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives |
|
|
(17,694 |
) |
|
|
16,534 |
|
|
|
(34,511 |
) |
|
|
30,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
22,105 |
|
|
|
41,768 |
|
|
|
32,155 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
(1,329 |
) |
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
21,691 |
|
|
|
40,439 |
|
|
|
31,697 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(6,029 |
) |
|
|
(14,189 |
) |
|
|
(3,819 |
) |
|
|
(18,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(7,262 |
) |
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
36,620 |
|
|
|
12,727 |
|
(Income) loss from consolidated joint ventures attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
|
1,129 |
|
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in operating
partnership |
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
(1,729 |
) |
|
|
(1,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
|
(4,311 |
) |
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
33,522 |
|
|
|
11,935 |
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(24,771 |
) |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
(31,326 |
) |
|
|
(9,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(29,082 |
) |
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
$ |
2,196 |
|
|
$ |
2,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
59,482 |
|
|
|
50,716 |
|
|
|
58,157 |
|
|
|
51,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
59,482 |
|
|
|
72,981 |
|
|
|
58,157 |
|
|
|
59,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to common shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
$ |
18,659 |
|
|
$ |
37,768 |
|
|
$ |
27,871 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(5,280 |
) |
|
|
(11,859 |
) |
|
|
(4,246 |
) |
|
|
(15,936 |
) |
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(24,771 |
) |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
(31,326 |
) |
|
|
(9,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(29,082 |
) |
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
$ |
2,196 |
|
|
$ |
2,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(7,262 |
) |
|
$ |
7,502 |
|
|
$ |
36,620 |
|
|
$ |
12,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on derivatives |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
Reclassification to interest expense |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(7,080 |
) |
|
|
7,582 |
|
|
|
36,996 |
|
|
|
12,748 |
|
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests in consolidated joint
ventures |
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
1,096 |
|
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to
redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating
partnership |
|
|
3,372 |
|
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
(1,766 |
) |
|
|
(1,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(4,187 |
) |
|
$ |
6,846 |
|
|
$ |
33,785 |
|
|
$ |
11,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
ASHFORD
HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
|
Series A |
|
|
Series D |
|
|
Series E |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Joint Ventures |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Partnership |
|
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
8,967 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
123,404 |
|
|
$ |
1,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,552,657 |
|
|
$ |
(543,788 |
) |
|
$ |
(550 |
) |
|
|
(64,404 |
) |
|
$ |
(192,850 |
) |
|
$ |
16,710 |
|
|
$ |
833,518 |
|
|
$ |
126,722 |
|
Reissuance of treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series E preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Series B-1 preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17,349 |
|
|
|
(17,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted shares/units under
equity-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
34,891 |
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
Shareholder short swing profit payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared Common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared Preferred A shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared Preferred B-1 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared Preferred D shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared Preferred E shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Reclassification to interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,786 |
) |
Redemption/conversion of operating
partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
(965 |
) |
Operating partnership units redemption
value adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,732 |
) |
|
|
35,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
8,967 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
124,897 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,654,956 |
|
|
$ |
(589,434 |
) |
|
$ |
(287 |
) |
|
|
(63,866 |
) |
|
$ |
(190,650 |
) |
|
$ |
15,155 |
|
|
$ |
891,128 |
|
|
$ |
163,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,620 |
|
|
$ |
12,727 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
66,196 |
|
|
|
73,478 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
10,111 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
(25,824 |
) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
Gain on insurance settlements |
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
Income from derivatives |
|
|
(36,160 |
) |
|
|
(31,241 |
) |
Amortization of loan costs, write-off of loan costs and exit fees |
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
Gain on disposition of hotel properties |
|
|
(2,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives |
|
|
34,511 |
|
|
|
(30,442 |
) |
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
5,360 |
|
|
|
3,239 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
(6,591 |
) |
|
|
5,336 |
|
Accounts receivable and inventories |
|
|
(12,148 |
) |
|
|
(11,658 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(3,247 |
) |
|
|
(2,783 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
8,844 |
|
|
|
24,018 |
|
Due to/from related parties |
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
400 |
|
Due to/from third-party hotel managers |
|
|
(5,713 |
) |
|
|
2,267 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
60,077 |
|
|
|
56,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of notes receivable |
|
|
22,487 |
|
|
|
21,984 |
|
Proceeds from sale/disposition of properties |
|
|
144,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
(145,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of condominium properties |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Improvements and additions to hotel properties |
|
|
(28,348 |
) |
|
|
(33,491 |
) |
Insurance proceeds |
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(18,786 |
) |
|
|
(11,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on senior credit facility |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of indebtedness and capital leases |
|
|
(150,494 |
) |
|
|
(5,426 |
) |
Payments of deferred loan costs |
|
|
(2,369 |
) |
|
|
(2,465 |
) |
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
80,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interests in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in consolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
Payments of dividends |
|
|
(21,909 |
) |
|
|
(11,133 |
) |
Payments for derivatives |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Cash income from derivatives |
|
|
36,407 |
|
|
|
31,413 |
|
Repurchase of Series B-1 convertible preferred stock |
|
|
(72,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,087 |
) |
Redemption of operating partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,763 |
) |
Issuance of operating partnership units and other |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(104,760 |
) |
|
|
(35,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(63,469 |
) |
|
|
9,684 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
217,690 |
|
|
|
165,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
154,221 |
|
|
$ |
174,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
66,273 |
|
|
$ |
67,147 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
1,551 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest added to principal of indebtedness |
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
Asset contributed to unconsolidated joint venture |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
ASHFORD
HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Description of Business
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (Ashford), is a self-advised
real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on investing in the hospitality industry across all
segments and in all methods including direct real estate, securities, equity, and debt. We
commenced operations in August 2003 with the acquisition of six hotels in connection with our
initial public offering. We own our lodging investments and conduct our business through Ashford
Hospitality Limited Partnership, our operating partnership. Ashford OP General Partner LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Ashford, serves as the sole general partner of our operating
partnership. In this report, the terms the Company, we, us or our mean Ashford Hospitality
Trust, Inc. and all entities included in its consolidated financial statements.
As of June 30, 2011, we owned 92 hotel properties directly, and five hotel properties through
majority-owned investments in joint ventures, which represents 20,774 total rooms, or 20,458 net
rooms excluding those attributable to our joint venture partners. All of these hotel properties are
located in the United States. In March 2011, we acquired 96 units of hotel condominiums at
WorldQuest Resort in Orlando, Florida for $12.0 million. Also in March 2011, with an investment of
$150.0 million, we converted our interest in a joint venture that held a mezzanine loan into a
71.74% common equity interest and a $25.0 million preferred equity interest in a new joint venture
(the PIM Highland JV) that holds 28 high quality full and select service hotel properties with
8,084 total rooms, or 5,800 net rooms excluding those attributable to our joint venture partner.
See Notes 3 and 6. At June 30, 2011, we also wholly owned a mezzanine loan receivable with a
carrying value of $3.0 million.
For federal income tax purposes, we elected to be treated as a REIT, which imposes limitations
related to operating hotels. As of June 30, 2011, 96 of our 97 hotel properties were leased or
owned by our wholly-owned subsidiaries that are treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries for federal
income tax purposes (collectively, these subsidiaries are referred to as Ashford TRS). Ashford
TRS then engages third-party or affiliated hotel management companies to operate the hotels under
management contracts. Hotel operating results related to these properties are included in the
consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2011, one hotel property was leased on a
triple-net lease basis to a third-party tenant who operates the hotel. Rental income from this
operating lease is included in the consolidated results of operations. With respect to our
unconsolidated joint venture, PIM Highland JV, the 28 hotels are leased to its wholly-owned
subsidiary that is treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes.
Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC (Remington Lodging), our primary property manager, is
beneficially wholly owned by Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., our Chairman, and Mr. Monty J. Bennett, our
Chief Executive Officer. As of June 30, 2011, Remington Lodging managed 46 of our 97 legacy hotel
properties, while third-party management companies managed the remaining 51 hotel properties. In addition, Remington Lodging also managed 16 of the 28 PIM Highland JV hotel properties and Remington Parsippany Employers LLC managed one of the 28 PIM Highland JV.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ashford, its
majority-owned subsidiaries and its majority-owned joint ventures in which it has a controlling
interest. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions between consolidated entities
have been eliminated in these consolidated financial statements.
These financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our 2010 Annual Report to
Shareholders on Form 10-K.
8
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following items affect our reporting comparability related to our consolidated financial
statements:
|
|
|
Some of our properties operations have historically been seasonal. This seasonality
pattern causes fluctuations in the operating results. Consequently, operating results for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
Marriott International, Inc. (Marriott) manages 40 of our properties. For these
Marriott-managed hotels, the fiscal year reflects twelve weeks of operations in each of the
first three quarters of the year and sixteen weeks for the fourth quarter of the year.
Therefore, in any given quarterly period, period-over-period results will have different
ending dates. For Marriott-managed hotels, the second quarters of 2011 and 2010 ended June
17 and June 18, respectively. |
Use of Estimates The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Investments in Hotel Properties Hotel properties are generally stated at cost.
However, the remaining four hotel properties contributed upon Ashfords formation in 2003 that are
still owned by Ashford (the Initial Properties) are stated at the predecessors historical cost,
net of impairment charges, if any, plus a noncontrolling interest partial step-up related to the
acquisition of noncontrolling interests from third parties associated with four of the Initial
Properties. For hotel properties owned through our majority-owned joint ventures, the carrying
basis attributable to the joint venture partners minority ownership is recorded at the
predecessors historical cost, net of any impairment charges, while the carrying basis attributable
to our majority ownership is recorded based on the allocated purchase price of our ownership
interests in the joint ventures. All improvements and additions which extend the useful life of the
hotel properties are capitalized.
Impairment of Investment in Hotel Properties Hotel properties are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not
be recoverable. We test impairment by using current or projected cash flows over the estimated
useful life of the asset. In evaluating the impairment of hotel properties, we make many
assumptions and estimates, including projected cash flows, expected holding period and expected
useful life. We may also use fair values of comparable assets. If an asset is deemed to be
impaired, we record an impairment charge for the amount that the propertys net book value exceeds
its estimated fair value. No impairment charges were recorded for investment in hotel properties
included in our continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Notes Receivable We provide mezzanine and first-mortgage financing in the form of
notes receivable. These loans are held for investment and are intended to be held to maturity and
accordingly, are recorded at cost, net of unamortized loan origination costs and fees, loan
purchase discounts and net of the allowance for losses when a loan is deemed to be impaired.
Premiums, discounts, and net origination fees are amortized or accreted as an adjustment to
interest income using the effective interest method over the life of the loan. We discontinue
recording interest and amortizing discounts/premiums when the contractual payment of interest
and/or principal is not received. Payments received on impaired nonaccrual loans are recorded as
adjustments to impairment charges. No interest income was recorded for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011, and $346,000 and $683,000 interest income was recognized for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
Variable interest entities, as defined by authoritative accounting guidance, must be
consolidated by their controlling interest beneficiaries if the variable interest entities do not
effectively disperse risks among the parties involved. Our mezzanine and first-mortgage notes
receivable are each secured by various hotel properties or partnership interests in hotel
properties and are subordinate to the controlling interest in the secured hotel properties. All
such notes receivable are considered to be variable interests in the entities that own the related
hotels. However, we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary of these hotel properties as a result of holding these loans. Therefore, we
do not consolidate the hotels for which we have provided financing. We will evaluate the interests
in entities acquired or created in the future
9
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
to determine whether such entities should be consolidated. In evaluating variable interest
entities, our analysis involves considerable management judgment and assumptions.
Impairment of Notes Receivable We review notes receivables for impairment in each
reporting period pursuant to the applicable authoritative accounting guidance. A loan is impaired
when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all
amounts recorded as assets on the balance sheet. We apply normal loan review and underwriting
procedures (as may be implemented or modified from time to time) in making that judgment.
When a loan is impaired, we measure impairment based on the present value of expected cash
flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate against the value of the asset recorded on
the balance sheet. We may also measure impairment based on a loans observable market price or the
fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If a loan is deemed to be impaired,
we record a valuation allowance through a charge to earnings for any shortfall. Our assessment of
impairment is based on considerable judgment and estimates. No impairment charges were recorded
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010. Valuation adjustments of $4.3 million
and $4.7 million on previously impaired notes were credited to impairment charges during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Valuation adjustments credited to impairment
charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were $1.2 million and $2.0 million,
respectively.
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures Investments in joint ventures in which
we have ownership interests ranging from 14.4% to 71.74% are accounted for under the equity method
of accounting by recording the initial investment and our percentage of interest in the joint
ventures net income (loss). We review the investment in our unconsolidated joint ventures for
impairment in each reporting period pursuant to the applicable authoritative accounting guidance.
The investment is impaired when its estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of our
investment. Any impairment is recorded in equity earnings (loss) in unconsolidated joint venture.
No such impairment was recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. We
adopted the equity accounting method for our investment in the PIM Highland JV due to the fact that
we do not control the joint venture. Although we have the majority ownership of 71.74% in the joint
venture, all the major decisions related to the joint venture, including establishment of policies
and operating procedures with respect to business affairs, incurring obligations and expenditures,
are subject to the approval of an executive committee, which is comprised of four persons with us
and our joint venture partner each designating two of those persons. Our investment in PIM Highland
JV had a carrying value of $190.8 million at June 30, 2011, which was based on our share of PIM
Highland JVs equity. As discussed further in Note 6, the PIM Highland JV is in the process of
finalizing their purchase price allocation. Our share of the PIM Highland JVs equity has been
based on the preliminary purchase price allocation.
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations We classify assets as held for
sale when management has obtained a firm commitment from a buyer, and consummation of the sale is
considered probable and expected within one year. In addition, we deconsolidate a property when it
becomes subject to the control of a government, court, administrator or regulator and we
effectively lose control of the property/subsidiary. When deconsolidating a property/subsidiary, we
recognize a gain or loss in net income measured as the difference between the fair value of any
consideration received, the fair value of any retained noncontrolling investment in the former
subsidiary at the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated, and the carrying amount of the former
property/subsidiary. The related operations of assets held for sale are reported as discontinued if
a) such operations and cash flows can be clearly distinguished, both operationally and financially,
from our ongoing operations, b) such operations and cash flows will be eliminated from ongoing
operations once the disposal occurs, and c) we will not have any significant continuing involvement
subsequent to the disposal.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we completed the sale of three hotel properties
that were reclassified as assets held for sale at December 31, 2010, and recorded a net gain of
$3.0 million. In June 2011, we recorded an impairment charge of $6.2 million for a hotel property that was under contract to sell at June 30,
2011. The hotel property has been classified as assets held for sale.
Revenue Recognition Hotel revenues, including room, food, beverage, and ancillary
revenues such as long-distance telephone service, laundry, and space rentals, are recognized when
services have been rendered. Rental income represents income from leasing hotel properties to
third-party tenants on triple-net operating leases. Base rent on the
10
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
triple-net lease is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease terms and variable rent is
recognized when earned. Interest income, representing interest on the mezzanine and first mortgage
loan portfolio (including accretion of discounts on certain loans using the effective interest
method), is recognized when earned. We discontinue recording interest and amortizing
discounts/premiums when the contractual payment of interest and/or principal is not received. Asset
management fees are recognized when services are rendered. Taxes collected from customers and
submitted to taxing authorities are not recorded in revenue. For the hotel leased to a third party,
we report deposits into our escrow accounts for capital expenditure reserves as income.
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedges We primarily use interest rate
derivatives to hedge our risks and to capitalize on the historical correlation between changes in LIBOR (London
Interbank Offered Rate) and RevPAR (Revenue per Available Room). The interest rate derivatives
include swaps, caps, floors, flooridors and corridors. All derivatives are recorded on the
consolidated balance sheets at fair value in accordance with the applicable authoritative
accounting guidance and reported as Interest rate derivatives. Accrued interest on the non-hedge
designated derivatives is included in Accounts receivable, net on the consolidated balance
sheets. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the
fair value is reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (OCI) in
the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. The amount recorded in OCI is reclassified
to interest expense in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects
earnings, while the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is
recognized directly in earnings as Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in the consolidated
statements of operations. For derivatives that are not designated as cash flow hedges, the changes
in the fair value are recognized in earnings as Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in the
consolidated statements of operations. We assess the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by
comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the
changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction. Derivatives
subject to master netting arrangements are reported net in the consolidated balance sheets.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards In December 2010, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued an accounting standard update to require a public entity to
disclose pro forma information for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting
period. The disclosures include pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the
current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred
during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual reporting period. If comparative
financial statements are presented, the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for
the comparable prior reporting period should be reported as though the acquisition date for all
business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the
comparable prior annual reporting period. The new disclosures are effective prospectively for
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The pro forma disclosures related
to our acquisition of the 28-hotel portfolio through the PIM Highland JV in Note 16 are made in
accordance with the new requirements. The adoption did not have an impact on our financial position
and results of operations.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards In May 2011, FASB issued an accounting
guidance for common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The guidance requires
disclosures of (i) quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for
level 3 measurements; (ii) description of the valuation processes surrounding level 3 measurements;
(iii) narrative description of the sensitivity of recurring level 3 measurements to unobservable
inputs; (iv) hierarchy classification for items whose fair value is only disclosed in the
footnotes; and (v) any transfers between level 1 and 2 of fair value hierarchy. The new accounting
guidance is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do
not expect a material impact on our financial position and results of operations from the adoption of this accounting guidance, but will make required
additional disclosures upon adoption.
In June 2011, FASB issued an accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. The
accounting update requires an entity to present each component of net income along with total net
income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive
income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The entity has the option to present the total
of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive
income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but
consecutive statements. The new accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect a material impact
on our financial position
11
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
and results of operations from the adoption of this accounting guidance,
but will make required presentation of net income and comprehensive income upon adoption.
Reclassifications Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010 have been reclassified for discontinued operations. These
reclassifications have no effect on the results of operations or financial position previously
reported.
3. Summary of Significant Transactions
Pending Sale of Hotel Property In June 2011, we entered into an agreement for the
sale of the Hampton Inn hotel property in Jacksonville, Florida. Based on the selling price, we
recorded an impairment charge of $6.2 million. The sale was completed in July 2011. The hotel
property has been reclassified as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet at June
30, 2011, and its operating results, including the impairment charge, for all periods presented
have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations.
Investments in Securities We continually seek new and alternative strategies to
leverage our industry and capital markets knowledge in ways that we believe will be accretive to
our company. We believe that we can utilize the same real-time information we use to manage our
portfolio and capital structure to invest capital in the public markets within the hospitality
industry. To implement this investment strategy, in the three months ended June 2011, our Board of
Directors authorized the formation of an investment subsidiary to invest in public securities of
lodging entities. This investment will be carried at fair market value. The maximum aggregate
investment amount that can be made by this subsidiary is currently $20.0 million.
Preferred Stock Offering and Redemption of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
In April 2011, we completed the offering of 3.35 million shares (including 350,000 shares pursuant
to the underwriters exercise of an over-allotment option) of our 9.00% Series E Cumulative
Preferred Stock at a net price of $24.2125 per share, and we received net proceeds of $80.8 million
after underwriting fees. Of the net proceeds from the offering, $73.0 million was used to redeem
5.9 million shares of the total 7.3 million shares of our Series B-1 convertible preferred stock
outstanding on May 3, 2011. The remaining proceeds were used for other general corporate purposes.
The remaining 1.4 million outstanding Series B-1 convertible preferred shares were converted into
1.4 million shares of our common stock, which was treated as a dividend of $17.4 million paid to
the Series B-1 preferred shareholder in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.
Repayment of a Mezzanine Loan In April 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement
with the borrower of the mezzanine loan which was secured by a 105-hotel property portfolio and
scheduled to mature in April 2011. The borrower paid off the loan for $22.1 million. The difference
between the settlement amount and the carrying value of $17.9 million was recorded as a credit to
impairment charges in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. We used $20.0 million of the
settlement proceeds to pay down our senior credit facility.
Acquisition of Hotel Properties Securing Mezzanine Loans Held in Unconsolidated Joint
Ventures In July 2010, as a strategic complement to our existing joint venture with
Prudential Real Estate Investors (PREI) formed in 2008, we contributed $15.0 million for an
ownership interest in a new joint venture with PREI. The new joint venture
acquired a portion of the tranche 4 mezzanine loan associated with JER Partners 2007 privatization
of the JER/Highland Hospitality portfolio (the Highland Portfolio). The mezzanine loan was
secured by the same 28 hotel properties as our then existing joint venture investment in the
tranche 6 mezzanine loan. Both of these mezzanine loans were in default since August 2010. After
negotiating with the borrowers, senior secured lenders and senior mezzanine lenders for a
restructuring, we, through another new joint venture, the PIM Highland JV, with PRISA III
Investments, LLC (PRISA III) (an affiliate of PREI), invested $150.0 million and PRISA III
invested $50.0 million of new capital to acquire the 28 high quality full and select service hotel
properties comprising the Highland Portfolio on March 10, 2011. We and PRISA III have ownership
interests of 71.74% and 28.26%, respectively, in the new joint venture. In addition to the common
equity splits, we and PRISA III each have a $25.0 million preferred equity interest earning an
accrued but unpaid 15% annual return with priority over common equity distributions. Our investment
in the PIM Highland JV is accounted for using the equity method and the carrying value was $190.8
million at June 30, 2011. The PIM Highland JV recognized a gain of $75.4 million at acquisition, of
which our share was $43.2 million, based on the preliminary assessment of the fair value of the
assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. The purchase price has been
12
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a preliminary basis using estimated
fair value information currently available. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets and
liabilities will be finalized as soon as practicable upon completion of the analysis of the fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which could result in adjustments to the
gain recognized based on the preliminary assessment. See Note 6.
Litigation Settlement In March 2011, we entered into a Consent and Settlement
Agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells) to resolve potential
disputes and claims between us and Wells relating to our purchase of a participation interest in
certain mezzanine loans. Wells denied the allegations in our complaint and further denies any
liability for the claims asserted by us; however, the Settlement Agreement was entered into to
resolve our claims against Wells and to secure Wells consent to our participation in the Highland
Hospitality Portfolio restructuring. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Wells agreed to pay us
$30.0 million over the next five years, or earlier, if certain conditions are satisfied. As part of
the Settlement Agreement, we and Wells have agreed to a mutual release of claims. We received the
settlement payment of $30.0 million and paid legal costs of $6.9 million in June 2011 ($5.5 million
of the legal costs were accrued at March 31, 2011). The settlement amount was recorded as Other
income and the legal costs of $6.9 million were recorded as Corporate general and administrative
expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Acquisition of Condominium Properties In March 2011, we acquired real estate and
certain other rights in connection with the acquisition of the WorldQuest Resort, a condominium
hotel project. More specifically, we acquired 96 condominium units, hotel amenities, land and
improvements, developable raw land, developer rights and Rental Management Agreements (RMAs)
with third party owners of condominium units in the project. Units owned by third parties with
RMAs and 62 of the 96 units we acquired participate in a rental pool program whereby the units are
rented to guests similar to a hotel operation. Under the terms of the RMAs, we share in a
percentage of the guest room revenues and are reimbursed for certain costs. The remaining 34 units
that we own are currently being finished out and will be added to the rental pool when completed.
All of these units are included in Investment in hotel properties, net in the consolidated
balance sheet.
Resumption of Common Dividends In February 2011, the Board of Directors accepted
managements recommendation to resume paying cash dividends on our outstanding shares of common
stock with an annualized target of $0.40 per share for 2011. For the six months ended June 30,
2011, we have declared dividends of $0.20 per share, subsequent payments will be reviewed on a
quarterly basis.
Completion of Sales of Hotel Properties In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we
completed the sale of the three hotel properties which were classified as assets held for sale at
December 31, 2010, the JW Marriott hotel in San Francisco, California, the Hilton hotel in Rye
Town, New York and the Hampton Inn hotel in Houston, Texas. We received net proceeds of $93.9
million (net of repayments of related mortgage debt of $50.2 million). We used the net proceeds to
reduce $70.0 million of the borrowings on our senior credit facility.
Sale of Additional Shares of Our Common Stock In January 2011, an underwriter
purchased 300,000 shares of our common stock through the partial exercise of the underwriters
1.125 million share over-allotment option in connection with the issuance of 7.5 million shares of
common stock completed in December 2010, and we received net proceeds of $2.8 million.
13
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. Investments in Hotel Properties
Investments in hotel properties consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
487,200 |
|
|
$ |
488,901 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
2,770,209 |
|
|
|
2,774,822 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
402,685 |
|
|
|
383,860 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
4,473 |
|
Condominium properties |
|
|
12,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
|
3,674,920 |
|
|
|
3,652,056 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(691,338 |
) |
|
|
(628,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
2,983,582 |
|
|
$ |
3,023,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2011, we acquired real estate and certain other rights in connection with the
acquisition of the WorldQuest Resort, a condominium hotel project. More specifically, we acquired
96 condominium units, hotel amenities, land and improvements, developable raw land, developer
rights and Rental Management Agreements (RMAs) with third party owners of condominium units in
the project. Units owned by third parties with RMAs and 62 of the 96 units we acquired participate
in a rental pool program whereby the units are rented to guests similar to a hotel operation. Under
the terms of the RMAs, we share in a percentage of the guest room revenues and are reimbursed for
certain costs. The remaining 34 units that we own are currently being finished out and will be
added to the rental pool when completed. All of these units are included in Investment in hotel
properties, net in the consolidated balance sheets.
14
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents certain information related to our hotel properties as of June
30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
Total |
|
|
% |
|
|
Owned |
|
Hotel Property |
|
Location |
|
Type |
|
Rooms |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Rooms |
|
Fee Simple Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Austin, TX |
|
Full |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
150 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Dallas, TX |
|
Full |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
150 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Herndon, VA |
|
Full |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
150 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Las Vegas, NV |
|
Full |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
220 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Syracuse, NY |
|
Full |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
215 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Flagstaff, AZ |
|
Full |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
119 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Houston, TX |
|
Full |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
150 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
West Palm Beach, FL |
|
Full |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
160 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Philadelphia, PA |
|
Full |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
263 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Walnut Creek, CA |
|
Full |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
249 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Arlington, VA |
|
Full |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
267 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Portland, OR |
|
Full |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
276 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Santa Clara, CA |
|
Full |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
257 |
|
Embassy Suites |
|
Orlando, FL |
|
Full |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
174 |
|
Hilton Garden Inn |
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
119 |
|
Hilton |
|
Houston, TX |
|
Full |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
243 |
|
Hilton |
|
St. Petersburg, FL |
|
Full |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
333 |
|
Hilton |
|
Santa Fe, NM |
|
Full |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
157 |
|
Hilton |
|
Bloomington, MN |
|
Full |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
300 |
|
Hilton |
|
Washington DC |
|
Full |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
408 |
|
Hilton |
|
Costa Mesa, CA |
|
Full |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
486 |
|
Hilton |
|
Tucson, AZ |
|
Full |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
428 |
|
Homewood Suites |
|
Mobile, AL |
|
Limited |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
86 |
|
Hampton Inn |
|
Lawrenceville, GA |
|
Limited |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
86 |
|
Hampton Inn |
|
Evansville, IN |
|
Limited |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
141 |
|
Hampton Inn |
|
Terre Haute, IN |
|
Limited |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
112 |
|
Hampton Inn |
|
Buford, GA |
|
Limited |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
92 |
|
Hampton Inn |
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
118 |
|
Marriott |
|
Durham, NC |
|
Full |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
225 |
|
Marriott |
|
Arlington, VA |
|
Full |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
697 |
|
Marriott |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
Full |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
358 |
|
Marriott |
|
Bridgewater, NJ |
|
Full |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
347 |
|
Marriott |
|
Plano, TX |
|
Full |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
404 |
|
Marriott |
|
Dallas, TX |
|
Full |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
266 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
102 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Baltimore, MD |
|
Limited |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
133 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Kennesaw, GA |
|
Limited |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
90 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Buford, GA |
|
Limited |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
96 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Gaithersburg, MD |
|
Limited |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
162 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Centreville, VA |
|
Limited |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
136 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Charlotte, NC |
|
Limited |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
136 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Durham, NC |
|
Limited |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
120 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Orlando, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
400 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Manhattan Beach, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
164 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Plymouth Meeting, PA |
|
Limited |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
199 |
|
SpringHill Suites by Marriott |
|
Glen Allen, VA |
|
Limited |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
136 |
|
Fairfield Inn by Marriott |
|
Kennesaw, GA |
|
Limited |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
87 |
|
Fairfield Inn by Marriott |
|
Orlando, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
388 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Bloomington, IN |
|
Limited |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
117 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Columbus, IN |
|
Limited |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
90 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Louisville, KY |
|
Limited |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
150 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Crystal City, VA |
|
Limited |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
272 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Ft. Lauderdale, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
174 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Overland Park, KS |
|
Limited |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
168 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Palm Desert, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
151 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Foothill Ranch, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
156 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Alpharetta, GA |
|
Limited |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
154 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Philadelphia, PA |
|
Limited |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
443 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
Limited |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
250 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
405 |
|
15
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
Total |
|
|
% |
|
|
Owned |
|
Hotel Property |
|
Location |
|
Type |
|
Rooms |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Rooms |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Orlando, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
312 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Oakland, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
156 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Scottsdale, AZ |
|
Limited |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
180 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Plano, TX |
|
Limited |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
153 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Edison, NJ |
|
Limited |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
146 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Newark, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
181 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Manchester, CT |
|
Limited |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
77 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott |
|
Basking Ridge, NJ |
|
Limited |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
235 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Lake Buena Vista, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
210 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Evansville, IN |
|
Limited |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
78 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Orlando, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
350 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Falls Church, VA |
|
Limited |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
159 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
San Diego, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
150 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Salt Lake City, UT |
|
Limited |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
144 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Palm Desert, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
130 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Las Vegas, NV |
|
Limited |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
256 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
Limited |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
200 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Plano, TX |
|
Limited |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
126 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Newark, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
168 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Manchester CT |
|
Limited |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
82 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn Buckhead |
|
Atlanta, GA |
|
Limited |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
150 |
|
Marriott Residence Inn |
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
Limited |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
120 |
|
TownePlace Suites by Marriott |
|
Manhattan Beach, CA |
|
Limited |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
144 |
|
One Ocean |
|
Atlantic Beach, FL |
|
Full |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
193 |
|
Sheraton Hotel |
|
Langhorne, PA |
|
Full |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
187 |
|
Sheraton Hotel |
|
Minneapolis, MN |
|
Full |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
222 |
|
Sheraton Hotel |
|
Indianapolis, IN |
|
Full |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
371 |
|
Sheraton Hotel |
|
Anchorage, AK |
|
Full |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
370 |
|
Sheraton Hotel |
|
San Diego, CA |
|
Full |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
260 |
|
Hyatt Regency |
|
Coral Gables, FL |
|
Full |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
242 |
|
Crowne Plaza |
|
Beverly Hills, CA |
|
Full |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
260 |
|
Annapolis Historic Inn |
|
Annapolis, MD |
|
Full |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
124 |
|
Air Rights/Ground Lease Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubletree Guest Suites |
|
Columbus, OH |
|
Full |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
194 |
|
Hilton |
|
Ft. Worth, TX |
|
Full |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
294 |
|
Hilton |
|
La Jolla, CA |
|
Full |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
296 |
|
Crowne Plaza |
|
Key West, FL |
|
Full |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
160 |
|
Renaissance |
|
Tampa, FL |
|
Full |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Notes Receivable
We had one mezzanine loan at June 30, 2011 and two mezzanine loans at December 31, 2010. In
April 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement with the borrower of the mezzanine loan which
was secured by a 105-hotel property portfolio and scheduled to mature in April 2011. The borrower
paid off the loan for $22.1 million. The mezzanine loan had a carrying value of $17.9 million at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, after an impairment charge of $7.8 million was recorded at
December 31, 2010. The difference between the settlement amount and the carrying value of $4.2
million was recorded as a credit to impairment charges in accordance with applicable accounting
guidance.
Our remaining mezzanine loan, which is secured by one hotel property, had an original
principal balance of $38.0 million. This loan was restructured in 2010 with a cash payment of $20.2
million and a $4.0 million note receivable which matures in June 2017, with an interest rate of
6.09%. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, this mezzanine loan had a net carrying value of $3.0
million. Payments on this loan have been treated as a reduction of carrying values, and the
valuation allowance adjustments have been recorded as credits to impairment charges in accordance
with applicable accounting guidance.
16
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
As discussed in Note 3, we acquired a 71.74% ownership interest in the PIM Highland JV and a
$25.0 million preferred equity interest earning an accrued but unpaid 15% annual return with
priority over common equity distributions. Although we have the majority ownership interest and can
exercise significant influence over the joint venture, we do not have control of the joint
ventures operations. All the major decisions related to the joint venture, including establishment
of policies and operating procedures with respect to business affairs, incurring obligations and
expenditures, are subject to the approval of an executive committee, which is comprised of four
persons with us and our joint venture partner each designating two of those persons. As a result,
our investment in the joint venture is accounted for using the equity method, which had a carrying
value of $190.8 million at June 30, 2011.
The 28-hotel property portfolio acquired and the indebtedness assumed by the joint venture had
preliminary fair values of approximately $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, at the date
of acquisition based on third-party appraisals (after a paydown of $170.0 million of related debt).
Cash, receivables, other assets acquired and other liabilities assumed had a net value of
approximately $291.1 million at the date of acquisition. The joint venture repaid $170.0 million of
the debt assumed at acquisition. The purchase price was the result of arms-length negotiations. The
PIM Highland JV recognized a gain of $75.4 million at acquisition, of which our share was $43.2
million, based on the preliminary assessment of the fair value of the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed. The purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed on a preliminary basis using estimated fair value information currently available. The
joint venture is in the process of evaluating the values assigned to investments in hotel
properties, ground leases for above/below market rents, management contracts with non-affiliated
managers, other intangibles and property level balances that have been transferred on to the joint
ventures balance sheet. Thus, the balances reflected below are subject to change and could result
in adjustments to the gain recorded on a preliminary basis. Any change in valuation of the PIM
Highland JVs preliminary investments in hotel properties will also impact the depreciation and
amortization expense and the resulting gain included in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint
ventures on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The following tables summarize the preliminary balance sheet as of June 30, 2011 and the
statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and the period from March 10, 2011
through June 30, 2011 of the PIM Highland JV (in thousands):
PIM Highland JV
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Investments in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
1,261,760 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
27,414 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
67,552 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
20,992 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,595 |
|
Deferred costs, net |
|
|
13,046 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
9,530 |
|
Due from third-party hotel managers |
|
|
18,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,420,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and partners capital |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Indebtedness and capital leases |
|
$ |
1,096,110 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
39,273 |
|
Due to affiliates |
|
|
2,991 |
|
Due to third-party hotel managers |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,138,990 |
|
Partners capital |
|
|
281,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital |
|
$ |
1,420,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
Our ownership interest in PIM Highland JV |
|
$ |
190,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
17
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
PIM Highland JV
Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
From |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
March 10 |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
to June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms |
|
$ |
75,963 |
|
|
$ |
92,402 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
27,653 |
|
|
|
33,775 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
5,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
107,995 |
|
|
|
131,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms |
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
19,688 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
17,964 |
|
|
|
21,924 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
31,167 |
|
|
|
37,707 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
4,182 |
|
Property taxes, insurance and other |
|
|
5,819 |
|
|
|
7,124 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17,672 |
|
|
|
23,522 |
|
Transaction acquisition costs |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
18,263 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
93,579 |
|
|
|
133,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
14,416 |
|
|
|
(1,906 |
) |
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs |
|
|
(15,006 |
) |
|
|
(18,874 |
) |
Gain recognized at acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,372 |
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives |
|
|
(1,049 |
) |
|
|
(1,639 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(1,568 |
) |
|
|
(1,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,207 |
) |
|
$ |
51,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our equity in earnings (loss) of the joint venture recorded |
|
$ |
(2,301 |
) |
|
$ |
25,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, as of June 30, 2011, we had a 14.4% subordinated beneficial interest in a
trust that holds the Four Seasons hotel property in Nevis, which had a zero carrying value. The
Sheraton hotel property in Dallas, Texas, held by a joint venture, in which we had an 18%
subordinated ownership interest, was carried at zero value. This hotel was sold in May 2011, but
due to our subordinated status we did not receive any proceeds from the sale, and no gain or loss
was recognized.
7. Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we completed the sales of the JW Marriott San Francisco
in California, the Hilton Rye Town in New York and the Hampton Inn Houston in Texas. As of June 30,
2011, the Hampton Inn hotel property in Jacksonville, Florida was under contract for sale. The
operating results of these hotel properties are reported as discontinued operations for all periods
presented. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, operating results of discontinued
operations also include those of the Hilton Suites Auburn Hills in Michigan that was sold in June
2010, and the Westin OHare in Illinois that was transferred to the lender through a deed-in-lieu
of foreclosure in September 2010.
18
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the operating results of the discontinued hotel properties (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Hotel revenue |
|
$ |
747 |
|
|
$ |
22,980 |
|
|
$ |
10,248 |
|
|
$ |
41,463 |
|
Hotel operating expenses |
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(17,221 |
) |
|
|
(7,910 |
) |
|
|
(32,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
5,759 |
|
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
8,780 |
|
Property taxes, insurance and other |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(1,919 |
) |
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
(3,915 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(3,364 |
) |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
(6,729 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
(6,237 |
) |
|
|
(12,068 |
) |
|
|
(6,237 |
) |
|
|
(12,068 |
) |
Gain on disposal of properties |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,576 |
) |
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
(5,075 |
) |
Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before
income tax expense |
|
|
(6,029 |
) |
|
|
(14,168 |
) |
|
|
(3,734 |
) |
|
|
(19,007 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
attributable to noncontrolling interests in
consolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations attributable
to redeemable noncontrolling interests in
operating partnership |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable
to Company |
|
$ |
(5,280 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,859 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,246 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Indebtedness
Indebtedness of our continuing operations consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Indebtedness |
|
Collateral |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Interest Rate |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
5 hotels |
|
December 2011 |
|
LIBOR(1) + 1.72% |
|
$ |
203,400 |
|
|
$ |
203,400 |
|
Senior credit
facility(2) |
|
Notes receivable |
|
April 2012 |
|
LIBOR(1) + 2.75% to 3.5% |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
10 hotels |
|
May 2012 |
|
LIBOR(1) + 1.65% |
|
|
167,202 |
|
|
|
167,202 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
2 hotels |
|
August 2013 |
|
LIBOR(1) + 2.75% |
|
|
147,533 |
|
|
|
150,383 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
1 hotel |
|
May 2014 |
|
|
8.32% |
|
|
|
5,580 |
|
|
|
5,775 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
1 hotel |
|
December 2014 |
|
Greater of 5.5% or LIBOR(1) + 3.5% |
|
|
19,740 |
|
|
|
19,740 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
8 hotels |
|
December 2014 |
|
|
5.75% |
|
|
|
107,908 |
|
|
|
108,940 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
10 hotels |
|
July 2015 |
|
|
5.22% |
|
|
|
157,676 |
|
|
|
159,001 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
8 hotels |
|
December 2015 |
|
|
5.70% |
|
|
|
99,686 |
|
|
|
100,576 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
5 hotels |
|
December 2015 |
|
|
12.60% |
|
|
|
149,528 |
|
|
|
148,013 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
5 hotels |
|
February 2016 |
|
|
5.53% |
|
|
|
113,718 |
|
|
|
114,629 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
5 hotels |
|
February 2016 |
|
|
5.53% |
|
|
|
94,307 |
|
|
|
95,062 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
5 hotels |
|
February 2016 |
|
|
5.53% |
|
|
|
81,690 |
|
|
|
82,345 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
1 hotel |
|
April 2017 |
|
|
5.91% |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
2 hotels |
|
April 2017 |
|
|
5.95% |
|
|
|
128,251 |
|
|
|
128,251 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
3 hotels |
|
April 2017 |
|
|
5.95% |
|
|
|
260,980 |
|
|
|
260,980 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
5 hotels |
|
April 2017 |
|
|
5.95% |
|
|
|
115,600 |
|
|
|
115,600 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
5 hotels |
|
April 2017 |
|
|
5.95% |
|
|
|
103,906 |
|
|
|
103,906 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
5 hotels |
|
April 2017 |
|
|
5.95% |
|
|
|
158,105 |
|
|
|
158,105 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
7 hotels |
|
April 2017 |
|
|
5.95% |
|
|
|
126,466 |
|
|
|
126,466 |
|
TIF loan |
|
1 hotel |
|
June 2018 |
|
|
12.85% |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
1 hotel |
|
November 2020 |
|
|
6.26% |
|
|
|
104,330 |
|
|
|
104,901 |
|
Mortgage loan |
|
1 hotel |
|
April 2034 |
|
Greater of 6% or Prime + 1% |
|
|
6,720 |
|
|
|
6,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,445,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,518,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
LIBOR rates were 0.19% and 0.26% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
(2) The outstanding balance of the senior credit facility was repaid in full in July 2011. |
In March 2010, we elected to stop making payments on the $5.8 million mortgage note
payable maturing January 2011, secured by a hotel property in Manchester, Connecticut. After
negotiating with the special servicer, in May 2011, we obtained a three-year extension on this loan
to May 2014. We paid $1.0 million at closing including a 1.25%
19
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
extension fee, the principal and
interest through May 1, 2011 to bring the loan current and certain deposits pursuant to the
modification agreement.
We are required to maintain certain financial ratios under various debt and derivative
agreements. If we violate covenants in any debt or derivative agreement, we could be required to
repay all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity at a time when we might be unable to
arrange financing for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. Violations of certain debt
covenants may result in us being unable to borrow unused amounts under a line of credit, even if
repayment of some or all borrowings is not required. The assets of certain of our subsidiaries are
pledged under non-recourse indebtedness and are not available to satisfy the debts and other
obligations of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. or our operating partnership, Ashford Hospitality
Limited Partnership and the liabilities of such subsidiaries do not constitute the obligations of
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. or Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership. Presently, our existing
financial debt covenants primarily relate to maintaining minimum debt coverage ratios, maintaining
an overall minimum net worth, maintaining a maximum loan to value ratio, and maintaining an overall
minimum total assets. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenants or other
requirements set forth in our debt and derivative agreements as amended.
In May 2011, we swapped $1.18 billion of our existing floating-rate debt (including our 71.74%
of the floating rate debt of the PIM Highland JV) to a fixed one-month LIBOR rate of 0.2675%. The
swap was effective from June 13, 2011 and terminates on January 13, 2012. There was no upfront cost
to us for entering into this swap other than customary transaction costs.
20
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9. Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic income (loss) per common share is calculated using the two-class method, or the treasury
stock method, if more dilutive, by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income/loss
per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts
to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares, whereby such exercise or
conversion would result in lower income per share. The following table reconciles the amounts used
in calculating basic and diluted income per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Income (loss) attributable to common shareholders Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
$ |
18,659 |
|
|
$ |
37,768 |
|
|
$ |
27,871 |
|
Less: Dividends on preferred stocks |
|
|
(24,771 |
) |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
(31,326 |
) |
|
|
(9,661 |
) |
Less: Dividends on common stock |
|
|
(6,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: Dividends on unvested restricted shares |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: Income from continuing operations allocated to unvested shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed income (loss) from continuing operations allocated
to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(29,905 |
) |
|
$ |
13,471 |
|
|
$ |
(5,602 |
) |
|
$ |
17,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(5,280 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,859 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,246 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,936 |
) |
Less: Loss from discontinued operations allocated to unvested shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed loss from discontinued operations allocated to
common shareholders |
|
$ |
(5,280 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,553 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,246 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to common shareholders Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations distributed to common shareholders |
|
$ |
6,009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,840 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Undistributed income (loss) from continuing operations allocated to
common shareholders |
|
|
(29,905 |
) |
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
(5,602 |
) |
|
|
17,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributed and undistributed income (loss) from continuing
operations basic |
|
|
(23,896 |
) |
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
6,238 |
|
|
|
17,802 |
|
Add back: Income allocated to Series B-1 convertible preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
Add back: Income allocated to operating partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations allocated to common
shareholders diluted |
|
$ |
(23,896 |
) |
|
$ |
18,006 |
|
|
$ |
6,238 |
|
|
$ |
19,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed loss from discontinued operations allocated to
common shareholders |
|
$ |
(5,280 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,553 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,246 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,579 |
) |
Add back: Loss from discontinued operations allocated to operating
partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributed and undistributed net loss from discontinued
operations allocated to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(5,280 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,917 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,246 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
59,482 |
|
|
|
50,716 |
|
|
|
58,157 |
|
|
|
51,953 |
|
Effect of assumed conversion of Series B-1 convertible preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,448 |
|
Effect of assumed conversion of operating partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
59,482 |
|
|
|
72,981 |
|
|
|
58,157 |
|
|
|
59,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations allocated to common
shareholders per share |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations allocated to common shareholders
per share |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders per share |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations allocated to common
shareholders per share |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations allocated to common shareholders
per share |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders per share |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Due to the anti-dilutive effect, the computation of diluted income (loss) per diluted share
does not reflect the adjustments for the following items (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations allocated to
common shareholders is not adjusted for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Series B-1 Preferred stock |
|
|
17,713 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
18,737 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income (loss) allocated to unvested restricted shares |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
Income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling
interests in operating partnership units |
|
|
(2,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
5,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,167 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
21,273 |
|
|
$ |
5,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares are not adjusted for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of unvested restricted shares |
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
Effect of assumed conversion of Preferred B-1 preferred stock |
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of assumed conversion of operating partnership units |
|
|
15,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,851 |
|
|
|
14,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
18,954 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
|
|
15,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
We are exposed to risks arising from our business operations, economic conditions and
financial markets. To manage the risks, we primarily use interest rate derivatives to hedge our
debt as a way to potentially improve cash flows. We also use non-hedge derivatives to capitalize on
the historical correlation between changes in LIBOR and RevPAR. To mitigate the nonperformance
risk, we routinely rely on a third partys analysis of the creditworthiness of the counterparties,
which supports our belief that the counterparties nonperformance risk is limited. All derivatives
are recorded at fair value. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market
standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts/payments and the
discounted expected variable cash payments/receipts. The fair values of interest rate caps, floors,
flooridors and corridors are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the
future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates fell below the strike
rates of the floors or rise above the strike rates of the caps. The variable interest rates used in
the calculation of projected receipts and payments on the swaps, caps, and floors are based on an
expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves (LIBOR
forward curves) and volatilities (the Level 2 inputs that are observable at commonly quoted
intervals, other than quoted prices). We also incorporate credit valuation adjustments (the Level
3 inputs that are unobservable and typically based on our own assumptions, as there is little, if
any, related market activity) to appropriately reflect both our own non-performance risk and the
respective counterpartys non-performance risk in the fair value measurements.
We have determined that when a majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the derivative valuations in their entirety are
classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. However, when the valuation adjustments
associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit
spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counter-parties, which we consider
significant (10% or more) to the overall valuation of our derivatives, the derivative valuations in
their entirety are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Transfers of inputs between
levels are determined at the end of each reporting period. In determining the fair values of our
derivatives at June 30, 2011, the LIBOR interest rate forward curve (the Level 2 inputs) assumed an
uptrend from 0.19% to 1.12% for the remaining term of our derivatives. The credit spreads (the
Level 3 inputs) used in determining the fair values of the non-hedge designated derivatives assumed
an uptrend in nonperformance risk for us and most of our counterparties. The credit spreads used in
determining the fair values of the hedge designated derivatives assumed a downtrend in
nonperformance risk for all but one of our counterparties.
22
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis aggregated by the level within which measurements fall in the fair value hierarchy (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-hedge derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
58,604 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58,604 |
|
|
$ |
74,283 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
74,283 |
|
Interest rate flooridor |
|
|
18,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,418 |
|
|
|
37,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,532 |
|
Hedge derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
77,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,022 |
|
|
|
111,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-hedge derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate floor |
|
|
(4,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,602 |
) |
|
|
(4,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
(4,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,695 |
) |
|
|
(4,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
72,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
72,327 |
|
|
$ |
106,867 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
106,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the derivatives that were measured
using Level 3 inputs is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(17,972 |
) |
Total unrealized loss included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,042 |
) |
Total unrealized loss included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss reclassified to interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets transferred into Level 3 still held
at the reporting date(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets transferred out of Level 3 still
held at the reporting
date(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Transferred in/out of Level 3 because the unobservable inputs used to determine the fair
value at end of period were more/less than 10% of the total valuation of these derivatives.
|
23
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of our non-hedge designated interest rate derivatives as of June 30, 2011 and
the effects of these derivatives on the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 were as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Savings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
or (Cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition in Income |
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/ |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Derivative Type |
|
Amount |
|
|
Strike Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
(Liability) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
1,800,000 |
|
|
Pays LIBOR plus 2.638%, receives 5.84% |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
83,151 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
$ |
(11,930 |
) |
|
$ |
13,601 |
|
|
$ |
26,835 |
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
1,475,000 |
|
|
Pays 4.084%, receives LIBOR Plus 2.638% |
|
2013 |
|
|
(23,750 |
) |
|
|
(6,975 |
) |
|
|
(2,828 |
) |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
|
|
(8,968 |
) |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
|
Pays 4.114%, receives LIBOR plus 2.638% |
|
2013 |
|
|
(797 |
) |
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
1,180,000 |
|
|
Pays 0.2675%, receives LIBOR |
|
2012 |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Interest rate floor |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
|
1.25% |
|
2013 |
|
|
(4,602 |
) |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
Interest rate
flooridor |
|
$ |
1,800,000 |
|
|
2.75% 0.50% |
|
2011 |
|
|
18,418 |
|
|
|
(9,917 |
) |
|
|
(19,114 |
) |
|
|
10,238 |
|
|
|
20,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,327 |
(1) |
|
$ |
(17,731 |
)(2) |
|
$ |
(34,537 |
)(2) |
|
$ |
18,157 |
(3) |
|
$ |
36,160 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reported as Interest rate derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
Reported as Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(3) |
|
Reported as Other income in the consolidated statements of operations. |
The fair value of our non-hedge designated interest rate derivatives as of December 31,
2010 and the effects of these derivatives on the consolidated statement of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010 were as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Savings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
or (Cost) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition in Income |
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/ |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Derivative Type |
|
Amount |
|
|
Strike Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
(Liability) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
3.75% |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(247 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
1,800,000 |
|
|
Pays LIBOR plus 2.638%, receives 5.84% |
|
2013 |
|
|
95,081 |
|
|
|
20,495 |
|
|
|
33,355 |
|
|
|
13,215 |
|
|
|
26,579 |
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
1,475,000 |
|
|
Pays 4.084%, receives LIBOR plus 2.638% |
|
2013 |
|
|
(20,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
|
Pays 4.114%, receives LIBOR plus 2.638% |
|
2013 |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate floor(1) |
|
$ |
1,475,000 |
|
|
1.25% |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,071 |
) |
|
|
(5,744 |
) |
|
|
(3,551 |
) |
|
|
(7,304 |
) |
Interest rate floor |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
|
1.25% |
|
2013 |
|
|
(4,951 |
) |
|
|
(897 |
) |
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
(1,609 |
) |
Interest rate flooridor |
|
$ |
3,600,000 |
|
|
1.25% 0.75% |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,367 |
) |
|
|
(6,787 |
) |
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
9,050 |
|
Interest rate flooridor |
|
$ |
1,800,000 |
|
|
1.75% 1.25% |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,245 |
) |
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
Interest rate flooridor |
|
$ |
1,800,000 |
|
|
2.75% 0.50% |
|
2011 |
|
|
37,532 |
|
|
|
7,623 |
|
|
|
15,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
106,864 |
(2) |
|
$ |
16,535 |
(3) |
|
$ |
30,470 |
(3) |
|
$ |
15,707 |
(4) |
|
$ |
31,241 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This interest rate floor was terminated and replaced by the 4.084%, $1,475,000 notional amount interest rate swap. |
|
(1) |
|
Reported as Interest rate derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
Reported as Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(3) |
|
Reported as Other income in the consolidated statements of operations. |
24
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of our hedge-designated interest rate derivatives as of June 30, 2011 and the
effects of these derivatives on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 were as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
in Income for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI |
|
|
into Interest Expense |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Strike |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Derivative Type |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
60,800 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
167,212 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
167,212 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
203,400 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
19,740 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
(1) |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
)(2) |
|
$ |
(12 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in Interest rate derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations. |
The fair value of our hedge-designated interest rate derivatives as of December 31, 2010
and the effects of these derivatives on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010 were as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
in Income for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI |
|
|
into Interest Expense |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Strike |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Derivative Type |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
60,800 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
203,400 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
167,212 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
167,212 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate corridor |
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
|
|
4.6%-6.0 |
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap |
|
$ |
19,740 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
(1) |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
$ |
|
(2) |
|
$ |
(28 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in Interest rate derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations. |
During the next twelve months, we expect $224,000 of the accumulated comprehensive loss
will be reclassified to interest expense.
We have derivative agreements that incorporate the loan covenant provisions of our senior
credit facility requiring us to maintain certain minimum financial covenant ratios on our
indebtedness. Failure to comply with the covenant provisions would result in us being in default on
any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement. At June 30, 2011, we were in
compliance with all the covenants under the senior credit facility and the fair value of
derivatives related to this agreement was an asset of $54.0 million.
11. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the operating partnership represents the limited
partners proportionate share of equity in earnings/losses of the operating partnership, which is
an allocation of net income/loss attributable to the common unit holders based on the weighted
average ownership percentage of these limited partners common units and the units issued under our
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the LTIP units) that are vested throughout the period plus
distributions paid to these limited partners with regard to the Class B units. Class B common units
have a fixed dividend
25
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
rate of 7.2%, and have priority in payment of cash dividends over common units but otherwise
have no preference over common units. Aside from the Class B units, all other outstanding units
represent common units. Beginning one year after issuance, each common unit of limited partnership
interest (including each Class B common unit) may be redeemed for either cash or, at Ashfords sole
discretion, one share of Ashfords common stock. The Class B common units are convertible at the
option of Ashford or the holder, into an equivalent number of common units at any time after July
13, 2016.
Beginning in 2008, we started issuing LTIP units to certain executives and employees as
compensation. These units have vesting periods ranging from three to five years. Upon vesting, each
LTIP unit can be converted by the holder into one common partnership unit of the operating
partnership which then can be redeemed for cash or, at Ashfords election, settled in Ashfords
common stock. Since 2008, we have issued 4.4 million LTIP units. As of June 30, 2011, all but 1.2
million of the LTIP units issued in May 2011 had reached full economic parity with the common units
and are convertible into common partnership units. All the LTIP units issued on or before June 30,
2011 had an aggregate value of $41.4 million at the date of grant which is being amortized over
their vesting periods. Compensation expense of $2.6 million and $3.4 million was recognized for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $864,000 and $1.2 million was
recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The unamortized value of the LTIP
units was $33.1 million at June 30, 2011, which will be amortized over periods from 0.2 year to 4.7
years.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, 100,000 operating partnership units with a fair
value of $1.0 million presented for redemption were converted to common shares at our election.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests, including the LTIP units, in our operating partnership as
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $163.0 million and $126.7 million. The carrying value
of redeemable noncontrolling interests as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 included
adjustments of $107.1 million and $72.3 million, respectively, to reflect the excess of redemption
value over the accumulated historical costs. These redeemable noncontrolling interests were
allocated net loss of $3.4 million and net income of $1.7 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, these
redeemable noncontrolling interests were allocated net income of $1.1 million and $1.9 million,
respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we declared distributions to the
operating partnership units totaling $2.0 million and $3.8 million. This distribution was recorded
as a reduction of redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership. No distributions
were declared for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
12. Equity and Equity-Based Compensation
Preferred Stock Offering and Redemption of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
In April 2011, we completed the offering of 3.35 million shares (including 350,000 shares pursuant
to the underwriters exercise of an over-allotment option) of our 9.00% Series E Cumulative
Preferred Stock at a net price of $24.2125 per share, and we received net proceeds of $80.8 million
after underwriting fees. Of the net proceeds from the offering, $73.0 million was used to redeem
5.9 million shares of the total 7.3 million shares of our Series B-1 convertible preferred stock
outstanding on May 3, 2011. The remaining proceeds were used for other general corporate purposes.
The remaining 1.4 million outstanding Series B-1 convertible preferred shares were converted into
1.4 million shares of our common stock, which was treated as a dividend of $17.4 million paid to
the Series B-1 preferred shareholder in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.
Sale of Additional Shares of Our Common Stock In January 2011, an underwriter
purchased 300,000 shares of our common stock through the partial exercise of the underwriters
1.125 million share over-allotment option in connection with the issuance of 7.5 million shares of
common stock completed in December 2010, and we received net proceeds of $2.8 million.
Resumption of Common Dividends In February 2011, the Board of Directors accepted
managements recommendation to resume paying cash dividends on our outstanding shares of common
stock with an annualized target of $0.40 per share for 2011. The dividends of $0.10 for each of the
first and second quarter of 2011 were paid in April and July, 2011, and subsequent payments will be
reviewed on a quarterly basis.
26
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Equity-Based Compensation During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we
recognized compensation expense of $960,000 and $1.9 million, respectively, related to our
equity-based compensation plan. Compensation expense of $1.2 million and $2.1 million was
recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. As of June 30, 2011, the unamortized amount of the unvested shares of restricted equity was $4.9
million and is being amortized over periods from 0.13 year to 3.8 years.
Preferred Dividends The Board of Directors declared dividends of $0.5344 per share
per quarter for our 8.55% Series A preferred stock, or $795,000 per quarter, and $0.5281 per share
per quarter for our 8.45% Series D preferred stock, or $4.7 million per quarter, for the first two
quarters of 2011 and 2010. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Board of Directors also
declared dividends of $0.45625 per share, or $1.5 million, for our 9% Series E preferred stock.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Joint Ventures Noncontrolling joint
venture partners have ownership interests ranging from 11% to 25% in five hotel properties with a
total carrying value of $15.2 million and $16.7 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively, and are reported in equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Noncontrolling
interests in consolidated joint ventures were allocated income of $438,000 and $1.4 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and loss of $427,000 and $1.1 million for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Restricted Cash Under certain management and debt agreements for our hotel
properties existing at June 30, 2011, escrow payments are required for insurance, real estate
taxes, and debt service. In addition, for certain properties based on the terms of the underlying
debt and management agreements, we escrow 4% to 6% of gross revenues for capital improvements.
Franchise Fees Under franchise agreements for our hotel properties existing at June
30, 2011, we pay franchisor royalty fees between 2.5% and 7.3% of gross room revenue and, in some
cases, food and beverage revenues. Additionally, we pay fees for marketing, reservations, and other
related activities aggregating between 1% and 3.75% of gross room revenue and, in some cases, food
and beverage revenues. These franchise agreements expire on varying
dates between 2013 and 2034.
When a franchise term expires, the franchisor has no obligation to renew the franchise. A franchise
termination could have a material adverse effect on the operations or the underlying value of the
affected hotel due to loss of associated name recognition, marketing support, and centralized
reservation systems provided by the franchisor. A franchise termination could also have a material
adverse effect on cash available for distribution to shareholders. In addition, if we breach the
franchise agreement and the franchisor terminates a franchise prior to its expiration date, we may
be liable for up to three times the average annual fees incurred for that property.
Our continuing operations incurred franchise fees of $7.4 million and $14.1 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $6.4 million and $12.1 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, which are included in other expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Management Fees Under management agreements for our hotel properties existing at
June 30, 2011, we pay a) monthly property management fees equal to the greater of $10,000 (CPI
adjusted since 2003) or 3% of gross revenues, or in some cases 2% to 7% of gross revenues, as well
as annual incentive management fees, if applicable, b) market service fees on approved capital
improvements, including project management fees of up to 4% of project costs, for certain hotels,
and c) other general fees at current market rates as approved by our independent directors, if
required. These management agreements expire from 2012 through 2044, with renewal options. If we
terminate a management agreement prior to its expiration, we may be liable for estimated management
fees through the remaining term, liquidated damages or, in certain circumstances, we may substitute
a new management agreement.
Taxes We and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the federal jurisdiction
and various states. Tax years 2007 through 2010 remain subject to potential examination by certain
federal and state taxing authorities. In 2009 and 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audited
one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries that leases two of our hotel properties for the tax year ended
December 31, 2007. In September 2010, the IRS issued a notice of proposed adjustment that reduced
the amount of rent we charged to the taxable REIT subsidiary. We own a 75% interest in the
27
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
hotel properties and the taxable REIT subsidiary at issue. We strongly disagreed with the IRS
position and in October 2010, we filed a written protest with the IRS and requested an IRS Appeals
Office conference. In determining amounts payable by our TRS subsidiaries under our leases, we
engaged a third party to prepare a transfer pricing study which concluded that the lease terms were
consistent with arms length terms as required by applicable Treasury regulations. If the IRS had
prevailed in its proposed adjustment, our taxable REIT subsidiary would have owed approximately
$1.1 million additional U.S. federal income taxes plus possible additional state income taxes of
$68,000, net of federal benefit. In June 2011, the IRS granted the Appeals conference and scheduled
it for late September 2011. However, in July 2011, the IRS notified us that in lieu of the September 2010 proposed adjustment, they intend
to impose a 100% federal excise tax on our share of the amount by which the rent was held to be
greater than the arms-length rate. If the IRS proceeds with the excise tax and prevails, our REIT
would owe approximately $5.7 million of U.S. federal excise
taxes. As a result of this recent change in the IRS approach,
the Appeals Office conference has been postponed but no date has been
selected as of yet. We intend to vigorously protest
this potential assessment. We believe the IRS transfer pricing methodologies applied in the audit
contain flaws and that the IRS adjustment to the rent charges is inconsistent with the U.S. federal
tax laws related to REITs and true leases. We believe we will prevail in the eventual settlement of
the audit and that the settlement will not have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations. In May 2011, the IRS commenced an audit of this same TRS for
the tax year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, in June 2011, the IRS notified us of their
intent to examine the federal income tax return of this TRS for the tax year ended December 31,
2009. During 2010, the Canadian taxing authorities selected our TRS subsidiary that leased our one
Canadian hotel for audit for the tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009. The Canadian
hotel was sold in June 2008 and the TRS ceased activity in Canada at that time. We believe that the
results of the completion of this examination will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition.
If we dispose of the four remaining properties contributed in connection with our initial
public offering in 2003 in exchange for units of operating partnership, we may be obligated to
indemnify the contributors, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, each of whom have
substantial ownership interests, against the tax consequences of the sale. In addition, we agreed
to use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain non-recourse mortgage indebtedness of at least
$16.0 million, which allows contributors of the Las Vegas hotel property to defer gain recognition
in connection with their contribution.
Additionally, for certain periods of time, we are prohibited from selling or transferring the
Marriott Crystal Gateway in Arlington, Virginia, if as a result of
such transactions, the entity from which we acquired
the property would recognize gain for federal tax purposes.
Further, in connection with our acquisition of certain properties on March 16, 2005 that were
contributed in exchange for units of our operating partnership, we agreed to certain tax
indemnities with respect to ten of these properties. If we dispose of these properties or reduce
debt on these properties in a transaction that results in a taxable gain to the contributors, we
may be obligated to indemnify the contributors or their specified assignees against the tax
consequences of the transaction.
In general, tax indemnities equal the federal, state, and local income tax liabilities the
contributor or their specified assignee incurs with respect to the gain allocated to the
contributor. The contribution agreements terms generally require us to gross up tax indemnity
payments for the amount of income taxes due as a result of such tax indemnities.
Potential Pension Liabilities Certain employees at one of our hotel properties are
unionized and covered by a multiemployer defined benefit pension plan. At acquisition of the hotel
property in 2006, there were no unfunded pension liabilities. Although those workers are not our
employees, the hotel manager of that hotel property may in the future de-unionize given their work
rules. It is reasonably possible that we may incur additional cost for the unfunded pension
liabilities should a de-unionizing occur. As of June 30, 2011, we have accrued $111,000 for the
potential unfunded liabilities.
Litigation We are currently subject to litigation arising in the normal course of
our business. In the opinion of management, none of these lawsuits or claims against us, either
individually or in the aggregate, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, or financial condition. In addition, management believes we have adequate
insurance in place to cover any such significant litigation.
28
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The authoritative accounting guidance requires disclosures about the fair value of all
financial instruments. Determining estimated fair values of our financial instruments requires
considerable judgment to interpret market data. The use of different market assumptions and/or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts at which these
instruments could be purchased, sold or settled. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of
financial instruments, for periods indicated, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
154,221 |
|
|
$ |
154,221 |
|
|
$ |
217,690 |
|
|
$ |
217,690 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
$ |
74,257 |
|
|
$ |
74,257 |
|
|
$ |
67,666 |
|
|
$ |
67,666 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
39,758 |
|
|
$ |
39,758 |
|
|
$ |
27,493 |
|
|
$ |
27,493 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
$ |
1,805 to $1,996 |
|
|
$ |
20,870 |
|
|
$ |
6,756 to $7,467 |
|
Interest rate derivatives |
|
$ |
72,327 |
|
|
$ |
72,327 |
|
|
$ |
106,867 |
|
|
$ |
106,867 |
|
Due from third-party hotel managers |
|
$ |
55,248 |
|
|
$ |
55,248 |
|
|
$ |
49,135 |
|
|
$ |
49,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indebtedness of continuing operations |
|
$ |
2,445,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,171,052 to $2,399,584 |
|
|
$ |
2,518,164 |
|
|
$ |
2,082,207 to $2,301,387 |
|
Indebtedness of assets held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,619 |
|
|
$ |
44,587 to $49,281 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
86,663 |
|
|
$ |
86,663 |
|
|
$ |
79,248 |
|
|
$ |
79,248 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
$ |
15,165 |
|
|
$ |
15,165 |
|
|
$ |
7,281 |
|
|
$ |
7,281 |
|
Due to related party |
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
Due to third-party hotel managers |
|
$ |
2,270 |
|
|
$ |
2,270 |
|
|
$ |
1,870 |
|
|
$ |
1,870 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. These financial assets bear interest at
market rates and have maturities of less than 90 days. The carrying value approximates fair value
due to the short-term nature.
Accounts receivable, due to/from related party or third-party hotel managers, accounts
payable, accrued expenses, and dividends payable. The carrying values of these financial
instruments approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these financial
instruments.
Notes receivable. Fair value of the notes receivable may be determined by using similar loans
with similar collateral. Since there is very little to no trading activity we had to rely on our
internal analysis of what we believe a willing buyer would pay for these notes. We estimated the
fair value of the notes receivable to be approximately 34% to 41% lower than the carrying value of
$3.0 million at June 30, 2011, and approximately 64% to 68% lower than the carrying value of $20.9
million at December 31, 2010.
Indebtedness. Fair value of the indebtedness is determined using future cash flows discounted
at current replacement rates for these instruments. For variable rate instruments, cash flows are
determined using a forward interest rate yield curve. The current replacement rates are determined
by using the U.S. Treasury yield curve or the index to which these financial instruments are tied,
and adjusted for the credit spreads. Credit spreads take into consideration general market
conditions, maturity and collateral. For the indebtedness valuation, we used estimated future cash
flows discounted at applicable index forward curves adjusted for credit spreads. We estimated the
fair value of the total indebtedness to be approximately 2% to 11% lower than the carrying value of
$2.4 billion at June 30, 2011, and approximately 8% to 17% lower than the carrying value of $2.6
billion at December 31, 2010.
Interest rate derivatives. Fair value of the interest rate derivatives are determined using
the net present value of the expected cash flows of each derivative based on the market-based
interest rate curve and adjusted for credit spreads of Ashford and the counterparties. See Note 10
for a complete description of the methodology and assumptions utilized in determining the fair
values.
15. Segment Reporting
We operate in two business segments within the hotel lodging industry: direct hotel
investments and hotel financing. Direct hotel investments refer to owning hotels through either
acquisition or new development. We report
29
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
operating results of direct hotel investments on an aggregate basis as substantially all of our
hotel investments have similar economic characteristics and exhibit similar long-term financial
performance. Hotel financing refers to owning subordinate hotel-related mortgages through
acquisition or origination. We do not allocate corporate-level accounts to our operating segments,
including corporate general and administrative expenses, non-operating interest income, interest
expense and amortization of loan costs, and income tax expense/benefit. Financial information
related to our reportable segments was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Hotel |
|
|
Hotel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
230,099 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
230,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
|
144,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,438 |
|
Property taxes, insurance and other |
|
|
11,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,769 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,027 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,316 |
) |
Gain on insurance settlement |
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
Transaction acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Corporate general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,005 |
|
|
|
11,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
187,329 |
|
|
|
(4,316 |
) |
|
|
11,411 |
|
|
|
194,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
42,770 |
|
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
(11,411 |
) |
|
|
35,675 |
|
Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint
ventures |
|
|
(2,301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,301 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,157 |
|
|
|
18,157 |
|
Interest expense and amortization of
loan costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,808 |
) |
|
|
(34,808 |
) |
Unrealized loss on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,694 |
) |
|
|
(17,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
40,469 |
|
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
(45,733 |
) |
|
|
(948 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
40,469 |
|
|
$ |
4,316 |
|
|
$ |
(46,018 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,379,843 |
|
|
$ |
3,569 |
|
|
$ |
241,422 |
|
|
$ |
3,624,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
217,293 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
217,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
|
140,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,760 |
|
Property taxes, insurance and other |
|
|
12,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,313 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
32,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,906 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
Corporate general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
185,979 |
|
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
|
|
8,323 |
|
|
|
193,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
31,314 |
|
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
(8,323 |
) |
|
|
24,525 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,652 |
|
|
|
15,652 |
|
Interest expense and amortization of
loan costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,321 |
) |
|
|
(35,321 |
) |
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,534 |
|
|
|
16,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
31,314 |
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
(11,407 |
) |
|
|
22,105 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
31,314 |
|
|
$ |
2,198 |
|
|
$ |
(11,821 |
) |
|
$ |
21,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,496,914 |
|
|
$ |
58,320 |
|
|
$ |
331,897 |
|
|
$ |
3,887,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Hotel |
|
|
Hotel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
441,889 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
441,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
|
282,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,298 |
|
Property taxes, insurance and other |
|
|
22,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,656 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
65,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,804 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,656 |
) |
Gain on insurance settlement |
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
Transaction acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
(818 |
) |
Corporate general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,888 |
|
|
|
24,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
368,853 |
|
|
|
(4,656 |
) |
|
|
24,070 |
|
|
|
388,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
73,036 |
|
|
|
4,656 |
|
|
|
(24,070 |
) |
|
|
53,622 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
joint ventures |
|
|
25,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,824 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
36,160 |
|
|
|
66,160 |
|
Interest expense and amortization of
loan costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,386 |
) |
|
|
(69,386 |
) |
Unrealized loss on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,511 |
) |
|
|
(34,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
98,860 |
|
|
|
34,656 |
|
|
|
(91,748 |
) |
|
|
41,768 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,329 |
) |
|
|
(1,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
98,860 |
|
|
$ |
34,656 |
|
|
$ |
(93,077 |
) |
|
$ |
40,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
415,484 |
|
|
$ |
683 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
416,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
|
271,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,511 |
|
Property taxes, insurance and other |
|
|
25,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,390 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
66,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,749 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,957 |
) |
Corporate general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
363,650 |
|
|
|
(1,957 |
) |
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
|
376,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
51,834 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
(14,981 |
) |
|
|
39,493 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,171 |
|
|
|
31,171 |
|
Interest expense and amortization of
loan costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,385 |
) |
|
|
(70,385 |
) |
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,442 |
|
|
|
30,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
51,834 |
|
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
(23,641 |
) |
|
|
32,155 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
51,834 |
|
|
$ |
3,962 |
|
|
$ |
(24,099 |
) |
|
$ |
31,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Pro Forma Financial Information
As discussed in Notes 3 and 6, on March 10, 2011, we and PREI formed the PIM Highland JV to
take ownership of the Highland Hospitality Portfolio through a debt restructuring and consensual
foreclosure. At closing, we invested $150.0 million and PREI invested $50.0 million to fund capital
expenditures and to reduce debt. We own 71.74% of the joint venture and PREI owns the remaining
28.26%.
The following unaudited pro forma statements of operations for the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010 are based on our historical consolidated financial statements adjusted to give
effect to the completion of the acquisition of
31
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
the Highland Hospitality Portfolio as if the transaction had occurred at January 1, 2010 and
January 1, 2011. The pro forma financial information is prepared for informational purposes only
and does not purport to be indicative of what would have resulted had the acquisition transaction
occurred on the date indicated or what may result in the future (in thousands, except per
share amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
As |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
Hotel revenue |
|
$ |
441,741 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
441,741 |
|
|
$ |
415,272 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
415,272 |
|
Other revenue |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
441,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441,889 |
|
|
|
416,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel expenses |
|
|
282,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,298 |
|
|
|
271,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,511 |
|
Property taxes, insurance and other |
|
|
22,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,656 |
|
|
|
25,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,390 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
65,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,804 |
|
|
|
66,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,749 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
(4,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,656 |
) |
|
|
(1,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,957 |
) |
Gain on insurance settlement |
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction acquisition costs |
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
1,089 |
(1) |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate general and administrative and other |
|
|
24,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,888 |
|
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
388,267 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
389,356 |
|
|
|
376,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
53,622 |
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
52,533 |
|
|
|
39,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,493 |
|
Equity in
earnings (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
25,824 |
|
|
|
(39,049 |
)(2)(3) |
|
|
(13,225 |
) |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
(12,196 |
)(2) |
|
|
(10,874 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
66,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,219 |
|
|
|
31,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,283 |
|
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs
and write-off of loan costs and exit fees |
|
|
(69,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,386 |
) |
|
|
(70,385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,385 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives |
|
|
(34,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,511 |
) |
|
|
30,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,442 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(1,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,329 |
) |
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
40,439 |
|
|
|
(40,138 |
) |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
31,697 |
|
|
|
(12,196 |
) |
|
|
19,501 |
|
(Income) loss from continuing operating attributable
to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2,670 |
) |
|
|
4,933 |
(4) |
|
|
2,263 |
|
|
|
(3,826 |
) |
|
|
1,910 |
(4) |
|
|
(1,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
attributable to the Company |
|
|
37,769 |
|
|
|
(35,205 |
) |
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
27,871 |
|
|
|
(10,286 |
) |
|
|
17,585 |
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(31,326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,326 |
) |
|
|
(9,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations available
to common shareholders |
|
$ |
6,443 |
|
|
$ |
(35,205 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,762 |
) |
|
$ |
18,210 |
|
|
$ |
(10,286 |
) |
|
$ |
7,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share basic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.50 |
) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.50 |
) |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic |
|
|
58,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,157 |
|
|
|
51,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
58,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,157 |
|
|
|
59,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
To eliminate transaction costs credit recorded in our financial statements. |
|
(2) |
|
To reflect our 71.74% loss in PIM Highland JV that owns the Highland Hospitality
Portfolio, which is calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical net income of Highland Hospitality Portfolio |
|
$ |
51,146 |
|
|
$ |
2,305 |
|
Pro forma adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional hotel operating results for the period from
January 1, 2011 through March 10, 2011 |
|
|
11,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional interest related to assumed debt at higher rates |
|
|
(11,372 |
) |
|
|
(8,531 |
) |
Amortization of loan costs incurred from assuming debt |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
(2,298 |
) |
Additional depreciation expense based on the fair value of
the hotel properties at acquisition and the useful lives
under our accounting policies |
|
|
(11,702 |
) |
|
|
(8,476 |
) |
Additional corporate general and administrative expense
for the period from January 1, 2011 through March 10, 2011 |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Removal of gain recognized at acquisition |
|
|
(75,372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Removal of transaction acquisition costs |
|
|
18,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjusted net loss |
|
|
(18,434 |
) |
|
|
(17,000 |
) |
Our percentage ownership |
|
|
x 71.74 |
% |
|
|
x 71.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our portion of PIM Highland JV net loss |
|
|
(13,225 |
) |
|
|
(12,196 |
) |
Reversal of equity earnings recorded |
|
|
(25,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustments |
|
$ |
(39,049 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The equity loss in unconsolidated joint ventures does not include $18.3 million of
closing costs incurred by PIM Highland JV. |
|
(4) |
|
To reflect our 71.74% loss in PIM Highland JV that is attributable to noncontrolling
interests. |
32
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
17. Subsequent Events
In July 2011, we reissued 7.0 million shares of our treasury stock at a gross price of $12.50
per share and received net proceeds of approximately $83.3 million. The net proceeds were used to
repay our outstanding borrowings under our existing senior credit facility of $50.0 million and the
remaining proceeds for general corporate purposes, including without limitation, financing future
hotel related investments, capital expenditures and working capital or repayment of debt and other
obligations.
In July 2011, we completed the sale of the Hampton Inn hotel property in Jacksonville, Florida
and received net proceeds of $9.6 million.
33
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements
and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. This report contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the Company
or we or our or us) cautions investors that any forward-looking statements presented herein,
or which management may express orally or in writing from time to time, are based on managements
beliefs and assumptions at that time. Throughout this report, words such as anticipate,
believe, expect, intend, may, might, plan, estimate, project, should, will,
result, and other similar expressions, which do not relate solely to historical matters, are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks,
uncertainties, and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected
by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties, and factors beyond our control. Should one or
more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, or projected. We caution
investors that while forward-looking statements reflect our good-faith beliefs at the time such
statements are made, said statements are not guarantees of future performance and are affected by
actual events that occur after such statements are made. We expressly disclaim any responsibility
to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or
otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements,
which were based on results and trends at the time those statements were made, to anticipate future
results or trends.
Some risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements
to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among
others, those discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2011. These risks and uncertainties continue to be
relevant to our performance and financial condition. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and
rapidly changing environment where new risk factors emerge from time to time. It is not possible
for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can management assess the impact of all such
risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may
cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements as indicators of actual results.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
General
Following a recession that lasted over two years, beginning in 2010 the lodging industry
started experiencing improvement in fundamentals, specifically occupancy and this improvement has
continued into 2011. Room rates, measured by the average daily rate, or ADR, which typically lags
occupancy growth in the early stage of a recovery, have continued showing upward growth. We believe
that, provided improvements in the economy occur, there will be a positive impact to the lodging
industry and hotel operating results for 2011. Our business strategy is to take advantage of the
cyclical nature of the hotel industry. We believe that in the current cycle, hotel values and cash
flows, for the most part, peaked in 2007. We expect we will not achieve similar cash flows and
values in the immediate future. Industry experts have suggested that cash flows within our industry
may achieve these previous highs again in 2014 through 2016.
Based on our primary business objectives and forecasted operating conditions, our current key
priorities and financial strategies include, among other things:
|
|
|
acquisition of hotel properties; |
|
|
|
|
disposition of hotel properties; |
|
|
|
|
investing in lodging related securities; |
|
|
|
|
pursuing capital market activities to enhance long-term shareholder value; |
|
|
|
|
preserving capital, enhancing liquidity, and continuing current cost saving measures; |
34
|
|
|
implementing selective capital improvements designed to increase profitability; |
|
|
|
|
implementing effective asset management strategies to minimize operating costs and
increase revenues; |
|
|
|
|
financing or refinancing hotels on competitive terms; |
|
|
|
|
utilizing hedges and derivatives to mitigate risks; and |
|
|
|
|
making other investments or divestitures that our Board of Directors deems appropriate. |
Our investment strategies continue to focus on the upscale and upper-upscale segments within
the lodging industry. We believe that as supply, demand, and capital market cycles change, we will
be able to shift our investment strategies to take advantage of new lodging-related investment
opportunities as they may develop. Our Board of Directors may change our investment strategies at
any time without shareholder approval or notice.
SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Sale of Additional Shares of Our Common Stock in July 2011 In July 2011, we
reissued 7.0 million shares of our treasury stock at a gross price of $12.50 per share and received
net proceeds of approximately $83.3 million. The net proceeds were used to repay our outstanding
borrowings under our existing senior credit facility of $50.0 million and the remaining proceeds
will be used for general corporate purposes, including without limitation, financing future hotel
related investments, capital expenditures and working capital or repayment of debt and other
obligations.
Pending Sale of Hotel Property In June 2011, we entered into an agreement for the
sale of the Hampton Inn hotel property in Jacksonville, Florida. Based on the selling price, we
recorded an impairment charge of $6.2 million. The sale was completed in July 2011. The hotel
property has been reclassified as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet at June
30, 2011, and its operating results, including the impairment charge, for all periods presented
have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations.
Investments in Securities We continually seek new and alternative strategies to
leverage our industry and capital markets knowledge in ways that we believe will be accretive to
our company. We believe that we can utilize the same real-time information we use to manage our
portfolio and capital structure to invest capital in the public markets within the hospitality
industry. To implement this investment strategy, in the three months ended June 2011, our Board of
Directors authorized the formation of an investment subsidiary to invest in public securities of
lodging entities. This investment will be carried at fair market value. The maximum aggregate investment
amount that can be made by this subsidiary is currently $20.0 million.
Preferred Stock Offering and Redemption of Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock
In April 2011, we completed the offering of 3.35 million shares (including 350,000 shares pursuant
to the underwriters exercise of an over-allotment option) of our 9.00% Series E Cumulative
Preferred Stock at a net price of $24.2125 per share, and we received net proceeds of $80.8 million
after underwriting fees. Of the net proceeds from the offering, $73.0 million was used to redeem
5.9 million shares of the total 7.3 million shares of our Series B-1 convertible preferred stock
outstanding on May 3, 2011. The remaining proceeds were used for other general corporate purposes.
The remaining 1.4 million outstanding Series B-1 convertible preferred shares were converted into
1.4 million shares of our common stock.
Repayment of a Mezzanine Loan In April 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement
with the borrower of the mezzanine loan which was secured by a 105-hotel property portfolio and
scheduled to mature in April 2011. The borrower paid off the loan for $22.1 million. The difference
between the settlement amount and the carrying value of $17.9 million was recorded as a credit to
impairment charges in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. We used $20.0 million of the
settlement proceeds to pay down our senior credit facility.
Acquisition of Hotel Properties Securing Mezzanine Loans Held in Unconsolidated Joint
Ventures In July 2010, as a strategic complement to our existing joint venture with
Prudential Real Estate Investors (PREI) formed in 2008, we contributed $15.0 million for an
ownership interest in a new joint venture with PREI. The new joint venture acquired a portion of
the tranche 4 mezzanine loan associated with JER Partners 2007 privatization of the JER/Highland
Hospitality portfolio (the Highland Portfolio). The mezzanine loan was secured by the same 28
hotel properties as our then existing joint venture investment in the tranche 6 mezzanine loan.
Both of these mezzanine loans
35
were in default since August 2010. After negotiating with the
borrowers, senior secured lenders and senior mezzanine lenders for a restructuring, we, through
another new joint venture, the PIM Highland JV, with PRISA III Investments,
LLC (PRISA III) (an affiliate of PREI), invested $150.0 million and PRISA III invested $50.0
million of new capital to acquire the 28 high quality full and select service hotel properties
comprising the Highland Portfolio on March 10, 2011. We and PRISA III have ownership interests of
71.74% and 28.26%, respectively, in the new joint venture. In addition to the common equity splits,
we and PRISA III each have a $25.0 million preferred equity interest earning an accrued but unpaid
15% annual return with priority over common equity distributions. Our investment in the PIM
Highland JV is accounted for using the equity method and the carrying value was $190.8 million at
June 30, 2011. The PIM Highland JV recognized a gain of $75.4 million at acquisition, of which our
share was $43.2 million, based on the preliminary assessment of the fair value of the assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed. The purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed on a preliminary basis using estimated fair value information currently
available. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities will be finalized as
soon as practicable upon completion of the analysis of the fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed, which could result in adjustments to the gain recognized based on the
preliminary assessment. See Note 6.
Litigation Settlement In March 2011, we entered into a Consent and Settlement
Agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells) to resolve potential
disputes and claims between us and Wells relating to our purchase of a participation interest in
certain mezzanine loans. Wells denied the allegations in our complaint and further denies any
liability for the claims asserted by us; however, the Settlement Agreement was entered into to
resolve our claims against Wells and to secure Wells consent to our participation in the Highland
Hospitality Portfolio restructuring. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Wells agreed to pay us
$30.0 million over the next five years, or earlier, if certain conditions are satisfied. As part of
the Settlement Agreement, we and Wells have agreed to a mutual release of claims. We received the
settlement payment of $30.0 million and paid legal costs of $6.9 million in June 2011 ($5.5 million
of the legal costs were accrued at March 31, 2011). The settlement amount was recorded as Other
income and the legal costs of $6.9 million were recorded as Corporate general and administrative
expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Acquisition of Condominium Properties In March 2011, we acquired real estate and
certain other rights in connection with the acquisition of the WorldQuest Resort, a condominium
hotel project. More specifically, we acquired 96 condominium units, hotel amenities, land and
improvements, developable raw land, developer rights and Rental Management Agreements (RMAs)
with third party owners of condominium units in the project. Units owned by third parties with
RMAs and 62 of the 96 units we acquired participate in a rental pool program whereby the units are
rented to guests similar to a hotel operation. Under the terms of the RMAs, we share in a
percentage of the guest room revenues and are reimbursed for certain costs. The remaining 34 units
that we own are currently being finished out and will be added to the rental pool when completed.
All of these units are included in Investment in hotel properties, net in the consolidated
balance sheet.
Resumption of Common Dividends In February 2011, the Board of Directors accepted
managements recommendation to resume paying cash dividends on our outstanding shares of common
stock with an annualized target of $0.40 per share for 2011. For the six months ended we have
declared dividends of $0.20 per share, subsequent payments will be reviewed on a quarterly basis.
Completion of Sales of Hotel Properties In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we
completed the sale of the three hotel properties which were classified as assets held for sale at
December 31, 2010, the JW Marriott hotel in San Francisco, California, the Hilton hotel in Rye
Town, New York and the Hampton Inn hotel in Houston, Texas. We received net proceeds of $93.9
million (net of repayments of related mortgage debt of $50.2 million). We used the net proceeds to
reduce $70.0 million of the borrowings on our senior credit facility.
Sale of Additional Shares of Our Common Stock In January 2011, an underwriter
purchased 300,000 shares of our common stock through the partial exercise of the underwriters
1.125 million share over-allotment option in connection with the issuance of 7.5 million shares of
common stock completed in December 2010, and we received net proceeds of $2.8 million.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our cash position from operations is affected primarily by macro industry movements in
occupancy and rate as well as our ability to control costs. Further, interest rates greatly affect
the cost of our debt service as well as the financial hedges we put in place. We monitor very
closely the industry fundamentals as well as interest rates. The
36
strategy is that if the economy
underperforms (negatively affecting industry fundamentals), some or all of the loss in cash flow
should be offset by our financial hedges due to, what we believe to be, the expectation that the
Federal Reserve will probably keep interest rates relatively low. Alternatively, if the Federal
Reserve raises interest rates
because of inflation, our properties should benefit from the ability to rapidly raise room rates in
an inflationary environment. Capital expenditures above our reserves will affect cash flow as well.
In September 2010, we entered into an at-the-market (ATM) program with an investment banking
firm to offer for sale from time to time up to $50.0 million of our common stock at market prices.
No shares were sold during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Proceeds from the ATM program, to
the extent the program is utilized, are expected to be used for general corporate purposes
including investments and reduction of debt.
In February 2010, we entered into a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (the SEDA) with YA
Global Master SPV Ltd. (YA Global) that terminates in 2013, and is available to provide us
additional liquidity if needed. Pursuant to the SEDA, YA Global has agreed to purchase up to $50.0
million (which may be increased to $65.0 million pursuant to the SEDA) of newly issued shares of
our common stock if notified to do so by us in accordance with the SEDA. No shares were sold during
the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Our principal sources of funds to meet our cash requirements include: positive cash flow from
operations, capital market activities, property refinancing proceeds, asset sales, and net cash
derived from interest rate derivatives. Additionally, our principal uses of funds are expected to
include possible operating shortfalls, owner-funded capital expenditures, new investments and debt
interest and principal payments. Items that impacted our cash flow and liquidity during the periods
indicated are summarized as follows:
Net Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash flows provided by operating
activities, pursuant to our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows which includes the changes in
balance sheet items, were $60.1 million and $56.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The increase in cash flows from operating activities was primarily due to a
net litigation settlement payment of $23.1 million, which is partially offset by the timing of
collecting receivables from hotel guests, paying vendors and settling with hotel managers, and an
increase in restricted cash due to additional cash deposits relating to certain debt services and
capital expenditures.
Net Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, investing
activities used net cash flows of $18.8 million. Cash outlays consisted of $145.8 million for the
acquisition of the 71.74% interest in PIM Highland JV 28-hotel properties, $12.0 million for the
acquisition of investment in hotel condominiums, and $28.3 million for capital improvements made to
various hotel properties. Cash inflows consisted of $144.1 million from the sale of three hotel
properties, $22.5 million from repayment of mezzanine loans and $748,000 of insurance proceeds from
settlement of insurance claims. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, investing activities used
net cash flows of $11.5 million. Principal payments on notes receivable generated total cash of
$22.0 million. Capital improvements made to various hotel properties used $33.5 million of cash.
Net Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, net cash
flows used in financing activities were $104.8 million. Cash outlays consisted of $73.0 million for
the repurchase of our Series B-1 preferred stock, $21.9 million for dividend payments to common and
preferred stockholders and unit holders, $2.4 million payment for loan modification and extension
fees, $150.5 million for repayments of indebtedness and capital leases, and $3.0 million
distribution to noncontrolling interest joint venture partner. These cash outlays were partially
offset by cash inflows of $80.8 million from issuance of Series E preferred stock, $25.0 million
borrowings from our senior credit facility, $2.8 million from issuance of 300,000 shares of common
stock, $36.4 million from the counterparties of our interest rate derivatives, and $970,000 from a
large shareholder (greater than 10% of a class of equity securities) for short swing profit and
buy-in payments from the issuance of operating partnership units. For the six months ended June 30,
2010, net cash flows used in financing activities were $35.6 million. Cash outlays consisted of
$45.1 million for purchases of common stock, $11.1 million for dividend payments to preferred
shareholders and unit holders, $2.5 million payment for loan modification and extension fees, $5.4
million for repayments of indebtedness and capital leases, $3.8 million for the redemption of
operating partnership units, $181,000 distribution to a noncontrolling interest joint venture
partner, and $52,000 for purchasing an interest rate cap agreement. These cash outlays were
partially offset by cash inflows of $31.4 million from the counterparties of our interest rate
derivatives and $1.0 million of contributions from a noncontrolling interest joint venture partner.
We are required to maintain certain financial ratios under various debt and derivative
agreements. If we violate covenants in any debt or derivative agreement, we could be required to
repay all or a portion of our indebtedness before
37
maturity at a time when we might be unable to
arrange financing for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. Violations of certain debt
covenants may result in us being unable to borrow unused amounts under a line of credit, even if
repayment of some or all borrowings is not required. In any event, financial covenants under our
current or future debt obligations could impair our planned business strategies by limiting our
ability to borrow (i) beyond certain
amounts or (ii) for certain purposes. Presently, our existing financial debt covenants primarily
relate to maintaining minimum debt coverage ratios, maintaining an overall minimum net worth,
maintaining a maximum loan to value ratio, and maintaining an overall minimum total assets. At June
30, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in our debt and
derivative agreements as amended.
Virtually, our only recourse obligation is our $250 million senior credit facility held by
nine banks, which expires in April 2012. The outstanding balance on this credit facility at June
30, 2011 was $50.0 million and was subsequently repaid in full in July 2011. The main covenants in
this senior credit facility include (i) the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined, of
1.35x through expiration (ours was 1.74x at June 30, 2011); and (ii) the maximum leverage ratio, as
defined, of 65% (ours was 59.9% at June 30, 2011). The current balance under this credit facility
is zero. In the event we borrow on this credit facility, we may be unable to refinance a portion or
all of this senior credit facility before maturity, and if it becomes necessary to pay down the
principal balance, if any, at maturity, we believe we will be able to accomplish that with cash on
hand, cash flows from operations, equity raises or, to the extent necessary, and asset sales.
Based upon the current level of operations, management believes that our cash flow from
operations along with our cash balances and the amount available under our senior credit facility
($200.0 million at June 30, 2011) will be adequate to meet upcoming anticipated requirements for
interest, working capital, and capital expenditures for the next 12 months. With respect to
upcoming maturities, we will continue to proactively address our upcoming 2011 maturities. No
assurances can be given that we will obtain additional financings or, if we do, what the amount and
terms will be. Our failure to obtain future financing under favorable terms could adversely impact
our ability to execute our business strategy. In addition, we may selectively pursue debt financing
on individual properties and our debt investments.
We are committed to an investment strategy where we will opportunistically pursue
hotel-related investments as suitable situations arise. Funds for future hotel-related investments
are expected to be derived, in whole or in part, from future borrowings under a credit facility or
other loans, or from proceeds from additional issuances of common stock, preferred stock, or other
securities, asset sales, and joint ventures. However, we have no formal commitment or understanding
to invest in additional assets, and there can be no assurance that we will successfully make
additional investments. We are encouraged by the incremental improvement in both the capital and
debt markets over the last quarter and may, when conditions are suitable, look at capital raising
options.
Our existing hotels are mostly located in developed areas that contain competing hotel
properties. The future occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR of any individual hotel could be materially and
adversely affected by an increase in the number or quality of the competitive hotel properties in
its market area. Competition could also affect the quality and quantity of future investment
opportunities.
Dividend Policy. In February 2011, the Board of Directors accepted managements recommendation
to resume paying cash dividends on our common stock with an annualized target of $0.40 per share
for 2011. The dividend of $0.10 per share per quarter for the first and second quarter of 2011 was
paid, and subsequent payments will be reviewed on a quarterly basis. We may incur indebtedness to
meet distribution requirements imposed on REITs under the Internal Revenue Code to the extent that
working capital and cash flow from our investments are insufficient to fund required distributions.
Or, we may elect to pay dividends on our common stock in cash or a combination of cash and shares
of securities as permitted under federal income tax laws governing REIT distribution requirements.
38
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes the changes in key line items from our consolidated statements
of operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
230,099 |
|
|
$ |
217,639 |
|
|
$ |
12,460 |
|
|
$ |
441,889 |
|
|
$ |
416,167 |
|
|
$ |
25,722 |
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
$ |
(144,438 |
) |
|
$ |
(140,760 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,678 |
) |
|
$ |
(282,298 |
) |
|
$ |
(271,511 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,787 |
) |
Property taxes, insurance and other |
|
$ |
(11,769 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,313 |
) |
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
(22,656 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,390 |
) |
|
$ |
2,734 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
(33,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,906 |
) |
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,804 |
) |
|
$ |
(66,749 |
) |
|
$ |
945 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
4,316 |
|
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
3,128 |
|
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,957 |
|
|
$ |
2,699 |
|
Gain on insurance settlement |
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
|
$ |
¯ |
|
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
|
$ |
¯ |
|
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
Transaction acquisition costs |
|
$ |
(406 |
) |
|
$ |
¯ |
|
|
$ |
(406 |
) |
|
$ |
818 |
|
|
$ |
¯ |
|
|
$ |
818 |
|
Corporate general and administrative |
|
$ |
(11,005 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,323 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,682 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,888 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,981 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,907 |
) |
Operating income |
|
$ |
35,675 |
|
|
$ |
24,525 |
|
|
$ |
11,150 |
|
|
$ |
53,622 |
|
|
$ |
39,493 |
|
|
$ |
14,129 |
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated
joint ventures |
|
$ |
(2,301 |
) |
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
(2,965 |
) |
|
$ |
25,824 |
|
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
|
$ |
24,502 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
Other income |
|
$ |
18,157 |
|
|
$ |
15,652 |
|
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
|
$ |
66,160 |
|
|
$ |
31,171 |
|
|
$ |
34,989 |
|
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs |
|
$ |
(34,808 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,321 |
) |
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
(69,386 |
) |
|
$ |
(70,385 |
) |
|
$ |
999 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives |
|
$ |
(17,694 |
) |
|
$ |
16,534 |
|
|
$ |
(34,228 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,511 |
) |
|
$ |
30,442 |
|
|
$ |
(64,953 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
(285 |
) |
|
$ |
(414 |
) |
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
(1,329 |
) |
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
|
$ |
(871 |
) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1,233 |
) |
|
$ |
21,691 |
|
|
$ |
(22,924 |
) |
|
$ |
40,439 |
|
|
$ |
31,697 |
|
|
$ |
8,742 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(6,029 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,189 |
) |
|
$ |
8,160 |
|
|
$ |
(3,819 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,970 |
) |
|
$ |
15,151 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(7,262 |
) |
|
$ |
7,502 |
|
|
$ |
(14,764 |
) |
|
$ |
36,620 |
|
|
$ |
12,727 |
|
|
$ |
23,893 |
|
(Income) loss from consolidated joint ventures
attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
(438 |
) |
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
$ |
(865 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,369 |
) |
|
$ |
1,129 |
|
|
$ |
(2,498 |
) |
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable
noncontrolling interests in operating
partnership |
|
$ |
3,389 |
|
|
$ |
(1,129 |
) |
|
$ |
4,518 |
|
|
$ |
(1,729 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,921 |
) |
|
$ |
192 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
$ |
(4,311 |
) |
|
$ |
6,800 |
|
|
$ |
(11,111 |
) |
|
$ |
33,522 |
|
|
$ |
11,935 |
|
|
$ |
21,587 |
|
Income from continuing operations represents the operating results of 96 hotel properties
included in continuing operations that we have owned throughout the entirety of the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The following table illustrates the key performance indicators
of these hotels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total hotel revenue (in thousands) |
|
$ |
230,019 |
|
|
$ |
217,155 |
|
|
$ |
441,741 |
|
|
$ |
415,272 |
|
Room revenue (in thousands) |
|
$ |
177,040 |
|
|
$ |
164,762 |
|
|
$ |
339,789 |
|
|
$ |
315,820 |
|
RevPAR (revenue per available room) |
|
$ |
98.96 |
|
|
$ |
92.97 |
|
|
$ |
95.61 |
|
|
$ |
89.39 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
76.20 |
% |
|
|
74.13 |
% |
|
|
73.08 |
% |
|
|
71.00 |
% |
ADR (average daily rate) |
|
$ |
129.87 |
|
|
$ |
125.42 |
|
|
$ |
130.83 |
|
|
$ |
125.90 |
|
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 with Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Room revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011 (the 2011 quarter) increased $12.3
million, or 7.5%, to $177.0 million from $164.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010
(the 2010 quarter). The increase in room revenue was primarily due to the continued improvements
in occupancy coupled with the increase in average daily rate. During the 2011 quarter, we
experienced a 207 basis points increase in occupancy and a 3.5% increase in room rates as the
economy continues to improve. Food and beverage experienced a similar increase of $425,000, or
1.0%, due to improved occupancy. Rental income from the triple-net operating lease remained at $1.5
million for both the 2011 quarter and 2010 quarter. Other revenue, which consists mainly of
telecommunication, parking, spa and golf fees, experienced a slight increase of $131,000.
No interest income from notes receivable has been recorded for the 2011 quarter as the
remaining two mezzanine loans in our loan portfolio as of March 31, 2011 were impaired in the
previous two years. As a result, the cash received from the remaining notes is recorded as credits
to impairment charges in accordance with applicable authoritative accounting guidance. We recorded
a credit to impairment charges of $4.3 million and $1.2 million for the 2011 quarter and the 2010
quarter, respectively. In April 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement with the borrower of
the mezzanine loan which was secured by a 105-hotel property portfolio and scheduled to mature in
April 2011. The
39
borrower repaid the loan for $22.1 million. The mezzanine loan had a carrying value
of $17.9 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, after an impairment charge of $7.8
million was recorded at December 31, 2010. The difference between the settlement amount and the
carrying value of $4.2 million was recorded as a credit to impairment charges in accordance with
applicable accounting guidance.
Asset management fees and other were $80,000 and $138,000 for the 2011 quarter and the 2010
quarter, respectively.
Hotel Operating Expenses. Hotel operating expenses consist of direct expenses from departments
associated with revenue streams and indirect expenses associated with support departments and
management fees. We experienced increases of $2.4 million in direct expenses and $1.3 million in
indirect expenses and management fees in the 2011 quarter. The increase in these expenses is
primarily attributable to higher occupancy and higher management fees resulting from increased
hotel revenues, and higher sales and marketing expenses. The direct expenses were 31.5% of total
hotel revenue for the 2011 quarter and 32.3% for the 2010 quarter.
Property Taxes, Insurance and Other. Property taxes, insurance and other decreased $544,000
for the 2011 quarter to $11.8 million. The decrease is primarily due to a $566,000 reduction in
property taxes resulting from our continued successful appeals as we secured reductions in the
assessed value related to certain of our hotel properties.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $121,000 for the 2011
quarter compared to the 2010.
Impairment Charges. We recorded a credit to impairment charges of $4.3 million and $1.2
million for the 2011 quarter and the 2010 quarter, respectively, for the cash received and the
valuation adjustments on previously impaired mezzanine loans.
Transaction Acquisition Costs. We incurred transaction acquisition costs of $406,000 relating
to certain costs for the acquisition of the 71.74% interest in PIM Highland JV and the acquisition
of real estate and other rights in the WorldQuest Resort condominium project.
Corporate General and Administrative. Corporate general and administrative expenses increased
to $11.0 million for the 2011 quarter compared to $8.3 million for the 2010 quarter. The non-cash
equity-based compensation expense increased $1.5 million, primarily due to the higher expense
recognized on the restricted equity-based awards granted in 2010 and 2011 at a higher cost per
share. Other corporate general and administrative expenses increased $1.2 million during the 2011
quarter primarily attributable to additional legal costs of $1.4 million incurred in connection
with a litigation settlement. The 2011 quarter also included a credit of $774,000 reimbursements
from PIM Highland JV.
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. We recorded an equity loss in our
unconsolidated joint ventures of $2.3 million for the 2011 quarter and an equity income of $664,000
for the 2010 quarter, respectively.
Interest Income. Interest income was $23,000 and $51,000 for the 2011 quarter and the 2010
quarter, respectively.
Other Income. Other income recorded on our interest rate derivatives was $18.2 million and
$15.7 million for the 2011 quarter and the 2010 quarter, respectively, representing the income
recognized on our interest rate derivatives.
Interest Expense and Amortization of Loan Costs. Interest expense and amortization of loan
costs decreased $513,000 to $34.8 million for the 2011 quarter from $35.3 million for the 2010
quarter. The decrease is primarily attributable to the interest savings from the repayment of $200
million on our senior credit facility since June 30, 2010, which was partially offset by an
increase in interest expense resulting from certain mortgage loans refinanced at higher rates.
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives. Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives represents
primarily the changes in fair value of the interest rate swap, floor, flooridor and cap
transactions we entered into since March 2008 which were not designated as cash flow hedges. We
recorded an unrealized loss of $17.7 million for the 2011 quarter and an unrealized gain of $16.5
million for the 2010 quarter on these derivatives. The fair value of these derivatives decreased
during the 2011 quarter primarily due to the movements in the LIBOR forward curve used in
determining the fair value and the passage of time.
40
Income Tax Expense. We recorded an income tax expense from continuing operations of $285,000
for the 2011 quarter and $414,000 for the 2010 quarter. The decrease in tax expense in the 2011
quarter is primarily due to the reversal of federal alternative minimum taxes and certain state
income taxes accrued in the first quarter of 2011 for our largest TRS subsidiary. This TRS owned a
hotel in Michigan which was placed in receivership in December of 2009. In May 2011, the receiver
sold the hotel to a third party, allowing us to recognize a loss on sale for tax purposes. Due to
the magnitude of the loss, we are projecting a net operating loss for this TRS for the tax year
ending December 31, 2011.
Loss from Discontinued Operations. Discontinued operations reported loss from operations of
$6.0 million for the 2011 quarter and $14.2 million for the 2010 quarter. We recorded an impairment
charge of $6.2 million for the Hampton Inn hotel property in Jacksonville, Florida during the 2011
quarter as the hotel property is currently under contract for sale. In addition, we recorded a net
gain of $158,000 from the adjustments at final settlements of the three hotel properties sold in
the first quarter of 2011. Discontinued operations for the 2010 quarter also included the operating
results of the Hilton Suites in Auburn Hills, Michigan that was sold in September 2010 and the
Westin OHare, Illinois that was deconsolidated at the closing of the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure
in September 2010.
(Income) Loss from Consolidated Joint Ventures Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. The
noncontrolling interest partners in consolidated joint ventures were allocated income of $438,000
and loss of $427,000 during the 2011 quarter and the 2010 quarter, respectively. The increase is
primarily due to the improved operating results of the hotel properties held in the joint ventures.
Net (Income) Loss Attributable to Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Operating
Partnership. The noncontrolling interests in the operating partnership were allocated net loss of
$3.4 million in the 2011 quarter and net income of $1.1 million in the 2010 quarter. The redeemable
noncontrolling interests represented ownership interests of 21.1% and 22.2% in the operating
partnership at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the net
increase in common stock outstanding resulting from the issuance of additional shares of our common
stock and the grants equity-based compensation, net of the effect of the units redeemed and
converted since June 30, 2010.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 with Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenue. Room revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (the 2011 period) increased
$24.0 million, or 7.6%, to $339.8 million from $315.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010 (the 2010 period). The increase in room revenue was primarily due to the continued
improvements in occupancy coupled with the increase in average daily rate. During the 2011 period,
we experienced a 208 basis points increase in occupancy and a 3.9% increase in room rates as the
economy continues to improve. Food and beverage experienced a similar increase of $2.7 million, or
3.5%, due to improved occupancy. Other revenue, which consists mainly of telecommunication,
parking, spa and golf fees, experienced a slight decline of $324,000. Rental income from the
triple-net operating lease increased $161,000 primarily due to higher hotel revenues related to
that property during the 2011 period resulting from improved ADR and the effect of higher
occupancy.
No interest income from notes receivable has been recorded for the 2011 period as the
remaining two mezzanine loans in our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2010 were impaired in the
previous two years. As a result, the cash received from the two remaining notes is recorded as
credits to impairment charges in accordance with applicable authoritative accounting guidance. We
recorded a credit to impairment charges of $4.7 million and $2.0 million for the 2011 period and
the 2010 period, respectively. In April 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement with the
borrower of the mezzanine loan which was secured by a 105-hotel property portfolio and scheduled to
mature in April 2011. The borrower repaid the loan for $22.1 million. The mezzanine loan had a
carrying value of $17.9 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, after an impairment charge
of $7.8 million was recorded at December 31, 2010. The difference of $4.2 million between the
settlement amount and the carrying value was recorded as a credit to impairment charges in
accordance with applicable accounting guidance.
Asset management fees and other were $148,000 and $212,000 for the 2011 period and the 2010
period, respectively.
Hotel Operating Expenses. We experienced increases of $6.0 million in direct expenses and $4.8
million in indirect expenses and management fees in the 2011 period. The increase in these expenses
is primarily attributable to higher occupancy and higher management fees resulting from increased
hotel revenues, and higher sales and marketing expenses. The direct expenses were 32.0% of total
hotel revenue for the 2011 period and 32.6% for the 2010 period.
41
Property Taxes, Insurance and Other. Property taxes, insurance and other decreased $2.7
million for the 2011 period to $22.7 million. The decrease is primarily due to a $2.1 million
reduction in property taxes resulting from our continued successful appeals as we secured
significant reductions in the assessed value related to certain of our hotel properties. Insurance
expense and other decreased $431,000 resulting from lower premiums for insurance policies renewed
since June 30, 2010 and lower uninsured losses incurred. The decrease in these expenses also
reflects a gain of $244,000 recognized on an insurance claim in the 2011 period.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased $945,000 for the 2011
period compared to the 2010 period, primarily due to certain assets that had been fully depreciated
since June 30, 2010, which is partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense resulting
from capital improvements made at certain hotel properties since June 30, 2010.
Impairment Charges. We recorded a credit to impairment charges of $4.7 million and $2.0
million for cash received and valuation adjustments on the previously impaired mezzanine loans.
Transaction Acquisition Costs. We recorded a net credit to transaction acquisition costs of
$818,000 for the 2011 period. We were reimbursed $1.2 million by the joint venture relating to
certain costs for the acquisition of the 71.74% interest in PIM Highland JV and incurred an
additional $135,000 for the acquisition. In addition, we incurred $271,000 for the acquisition of
real estate and other rights in the WorldQuest Resort condominium project.
Corporate General and Administrative. Corporate general and administrative expenses increased
to $24.9 million for the 2011 period compared to $15.0 million for the 2010 period. The non-cash
stock/unit-based compensation expense increased $2.1 million, primarily due to the higher expense
recognized on the restricted stock/unit-based awards granted in 2010 and 2011 at a higher cost per
share. For the 2011 period, corporate general and administrative expenses also included $6.9
million in legal costs associated with a litigation settlement. Other corporate general and
administrative expenses increased $911,000 during the 2011 period primarily attributable to an
increase in target incentives for certain executives. The 2011 period also included a credit of
$947,000 reimbursements from PIM Highland JV.
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. We recorded equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures of $25.8 million and $1.3 million for the 2011 period and the 2010
period, respectively. Included in the 2011 period was a gain of $75.4 million recognized by the PIM
Highland JV at acquisition, of which our share was $43.2 million, and $18.3 million of transaction
costs recorded for the acquisition. Excluding the gain and the transaction costs, our equity loss
would be $4.3 million for the 2011 period.
Interest Income. Interest income was $59,000 and $112,000 for the 2011 period and the 2010
period, respectively.
Other Income. Other income was $66.2 million and $31.2 million for the 2011 period and the
2010 period, respectively. Income from the non-hedge interest rate swap, floor and flooridors
accounted for $36.1 million and $31.2 million for the 2011 period and the 2010 period,
respectively. For the 2011 period, other income included a gain of $30.0 million recognized from a
litigation settlement.
Interest Expense and Amortization of Loan Costs. Interest expense and amortization of loan
costs decreased $999,000 to $69.4 million for the 2011 period from $70.4 million for the 2010
period. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decline in interest expense resulting from the
principal repaid on our senior credit facility and other indebtedness since June 30, 2010, and
decreased amortization of loan costs resulting from certain loan costs that were fully amortized at
their initial maturity dates, net of the increase in interest from loans refinanced at higher
interest rates since June 30, 2010.
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives. We recorded an unrealized loss of $34.5 million for
the 2011 period and an unrealized gain of $30.4 million for the 2010 period on these derivatives.
The fair value of these derivatives decreased during the 2011 period primarily due to the movements
in the LIBOR forward curve used in determining the fair value and the passage of time.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded an income tax expense from continuing operations of $1.3
million for the 2011 period and $458,000 for the 2010 period. The increase in tax expense in the
2011 period is primarily due to increased profitability in certain of our TRS subsidiaries.
42
Loss from Discontinued Operations. Discontinued operations reported loss from operations of
$3.8 million for the 2011 period and loss of $19.0 million for the 2010 period. During the 2011
period, we completed the sale of the JW Marriott hotel in San Francisco, CA, the Hilton hotel in
Rye Town, NY and the Hampton Inn hotel in Houston, TX. We recorded a net gain of $3.0 million
mainly from the sale of the Hampton Inn hotel in Houston, Texas and the adjustments at final
settlements. During the 2011 period, an impairment of $6.2 million was recorded for the Hampton Inn
hotel property in Jacksonville, Florida. Discontinued operations for the 2010 period also include
the operating
results of the Hilton Suites in Auburn Hills, Michigan that was sold in September 2010 and the
Westin OHare, Illinois that was deconsolidated at the closing of the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure
in September 2010.
(Income) Loss from Consolidated Joint Ventures Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. The
noncontrolling interest partners in consolidated joint ventures were allocated income of $1.4
million during the 2011 period and a loss of $1.1 million during the 2010 period. In the 2011
period, we recorded a gain of $2.1 million from the sale of the Hampton Inn hotel property in
Houston, Texas that was held by a joint venture.
Net (Income) Loss Attributable to Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Operating
Partnership. The noncontrolling interests were allocated net income of $1.7 million and $1.9
million in the 2011 period and the 2010 period, respectively.
SEASONALITY
Our properties operations historically have been seasonal as certain properties maintain
higher occupancy rates during the summer months and some during the winter months. This seasonality
pattern can cause fluctuations in our quarterly lease revenue under our percentage leases. We
anticipate that our cash flows from the operations of our properties will be sufficient to enable
us to make quarterly distributions to maintain our REIT status. To the extent that cash flows from
operations are insufficient during any quarter due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in lease
revenue, we expect to utilize other cash on hand or borrowings to fund required distributions.
However, we cannot make any assurances that we will make distributions in the future.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
There have been no material changes since December 31, 2010, outside of the ordinary course of
business, to the contractual obligations specified in the table of contractual obligations included
in the section Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included in our 2010 Form 10-K.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In December 2010, FASB issued an accounting standard update to require a public entity to
disclose pro forma information for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting
period. The disclosures include pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the
current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred
during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual reporting period. If comparative
financial statements are presented, the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for
the comparable prior reporting period should be reported as though the acquisition date for all
business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the
comparable prior annual reporting period. The new disclosures are effective prospectively for
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The pro forma disclosures related
to our acquisition of the 28-hotel portfolio through the PIM Highland JV in Note 16 are made in
accordance with the new requirements. The adoption did not have an impact on our financial position
and results of operations.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In May 2011, FASB issued an accounting guidance for common fair value measurement and
disclosure requirements. The guidance requires disclosures of (i) quantitative information about
the significant unobservable inputs used for level 3 measurements; (ii) description of the
valuation processes surrounding level 3 measurements; (iii) narrative description of the
sensitivity of recurring level 3 measurements to unobservable inputs; (iv) hierarchy classification
for items whose fair value is only disclosed in the footnotes; and (v) any transfers between level
1 and 2 of fair value hierarchy. The new accounting guidance is effective during interim and annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect a material impact on our financial
position and results of operations from the adoption of this accounting guidance, but will make
required additional disclosures upon adoption.
43
In June 2011, FASB issued an accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. The
accounting update requires an entity to present each component of net income along with total net
income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive
income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The entity has the option to present the total
of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive
income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but
consecutive statements. The new accounting guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect a material impact
on our financial position
and results of operations from the adoption of this accounting guidance, but will make required
presentation of net income and comprehensive income upon adoption.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The following non-GAAP presentations of EBITDA and FFO are made to help our investors in
evaluating our operating performance. EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) attributable to the
Company before interest expense, interest income other than interest income from mezzanine loans,
income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and noncontrolling interests in the operating
partnership. We present EBITDA because we believe it provides useful information to investors as it
is an indicator of our ability to meet our future debt payment requirements, working capital
requirements and it provides an overall evaluation of our financial condition. EBITDA as calculated
by us may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other companies that do not define EBITDA exactly
as we define the term. EBITDA does not represent cash generated from operating activities
determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and should not be
considered as an alternative to operating income or net income determined in accordance with GAAP
as an indicator of performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as
determined by GAAP as a indicator of liquidity. The following table reconciles net income (loss) to
EBITDA (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(7,262 |
) |
|
$ |
7,502 |
|
|
$ |
36,620 |
|
|
$ |
12,727 |
|
(Income) loss from consolidated joint ventures
attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
|
1,129 |
|
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable
noncontrolling interests in operating
partnership |
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
(1,729 |
) |
|
|
(1,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
|
(4,311 |
) |
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
33,522 |
|
|
|
11,935 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
32,402 |
|
|
|
35,322 |
|
|
|
64,563 |
|
|
|
71,640 |
|
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs |
|
|
34,346 |
|
|
|
37,436 |
|
|
|
69,162 |
|
|
|
74,541 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable
noncontrolling interests in operating
partnership |
|
|
(3,389 |
) |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
1,921 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(1) |
|
$ |
59,311 |
|
|
$ |
81,072 |
|
|
$ |
170,332 |
|
|
$ |
160,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBITDA is not adjusted for income received from interest rate derivatives because the
related derivatives are not designated as hedges under the applicable authoritative
accounting guidance and therefore, this income is reported as other income instead of a
reduction of interest expense in accordance with GAAP. |
The White Paper on Funds From Operations (FFO) approved by the Board of Governors of
the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) in April 2002 defines FFO as
net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses on sales of
properties and extraordinary items as defined by GAAP, plus depreciation and amortization of real
estate assets, and net of adjustments for the portion of these items attributable to noncontrolling
interests in the operating partnership. NAREIT developed FFO as a relative measure of performance
of an equity REIT to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated
on the basis determined by GAAP. We compute FFO in accordance with our interpretation of standards
established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that either do
not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or interpret the NAREIT
definition differently than us. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities as
determined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to a) GAAP net income or loss as
an indication of our financial performance or b) GAAP cash flows from operating activities as a
measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to satisfy our cash needs,
including our ability to make cash distributions. However, to facilitate a clear understanding of
our historical operating results, we believe that FFO should be considered along with our net
income or loss and cash flows reported in the consolidated financial statements.
44
The following table reconciles net income (loss) to FFO (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(7,262 |
) |
|
$ |
7,502 |
|
|
$ |
36,620 |
|
|
$ |
12,727 |
|
(Income) loss from consolidated joint ventures
attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
|
1,129 |
|
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable
noncontrolling interests in operating partnership |
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
(1,729 |
) |
|
|
(1,921 |
) |
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(24,771 |
) |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
(31,326 |
) |
|
|
(9,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders. |
|
|
(29,082 |
) |
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of real estate |
|
|
32,340 |
|
|
|
35,255 |
|
|
|
64,439 |
|
|
|
71,505 |
|
Gain on sale/disposition of properties |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noncash gain on insurance settlements |
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable
noncontrolling interests in operating partnership |
|
|
(3,389 |
) |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(1,446 |
) |
|
$ |
38,353 |
|
|
$ |
64,246 |
|
|
$ |
75,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary market risk exposure consists of changes in interest rates on borrowings under our
debt instruments, our derivatives portfolio and notes receivable that bear interest at variable
rates that fluctuate with market interest rates. The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the
market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market interest rates.
At June 30, 2011, the total indebtedness of $2.4 billion of our continuing operations included
$594.6 million of variable-rate debt. The impact on the results of operations of a 25-basis point
change in interest rate on the outstanding balance of variable-rate debt at June 30, 2011 would be
approximately $1.4 million per year. Interest rate changes will have no impact on the remaining
$1.9 billion of fixed rate debt.
The above amounts were determined based on the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our
borrowings and assume no changes in our capital structure. As the information presented above
includes only those exposures that existed at June 30, 2011, it does not consider exposures or
positions that could arise after that date. Accordingly, the information presented herein has
limited predictive value. As a result, the ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest
rate fluctuations will depend on exposures that arise during the period, the hedging strategies at
the time, and the related interest rates.
We primarily use interest rate derivatives in order to capitalize on the historical
correlation between changes in LIBOR and RevPAR. Beginning in March 2008, we entered into various
interest rate swap, cap, floor, and flooridor transactions that were not designated as hedges. The
changes in the fair market values of these transactions are noncash items and recorded in earnings.
The interest rate derivatives we entered into since 2008 have resulted in total income of
approximately $161.7 million through June 30, 2011. Based on the LIBOR rates in effect on June 30,
2011, these derivatives are expected to result in income of approximately $34.7 million for the
remainder of 2011.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of the our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, our management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2011 (Evaluation Date). Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the
Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective (i) to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities
and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and (ii) to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
45
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most
recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are currently subject to litigation arising in the normal course of our business. In the
opinion of management, none of these lawsuits or claims against us, either individually or in the
aggregate, is likely to have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. In addition, we believe we
have adequate insurance in place to cover such litigation.
See Part I, Item 2 regarding the litigation settlement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors
contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which describe various risks and uncertainties
to which we are or may become subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect
our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a
material and adverse manner. At June 30, 2011, there have been no material changes to the risk
factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(c) The following table provides the information with respect to repurchases we made of shares
of our common stock and units of our operating partnership during each month of the second quarter
of 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Maximum Dollar |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Value of Shares That |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
May Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Plan(1) |
|
|
Under the Plan |
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1 to April 30 |
|
|
10,914 |
(2) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,449,000 |
|
May 1 to May 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,449,000 |
|
June 1 to June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,449,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,914 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In November 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a $50 million common stock
repurchase plan, which was announced on November 21, 2007. The repurchase plan was increased
by $75 million in September 2008, and the program was subsequently amended to include both
common and preferred stock. In January 2009, the Board of Directors authorized an additional
$200 million for the repurchase plan and expanded the plan to include the prepayment of our
outstanding debt obligations. In February 2010, the Board of Directors expanded the repurchase
program further to also include the potential repurchase of units of our operating
partnership. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents shares forfeited to the Company to satisfy employees federal income tax
obligations in connection with vesting of equity grants issued under our equity-based compensation
plan. |
46
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form S-11/A, filed on July 31, 2003) |
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 8-K, filed November 12, 2010) |
|
31.1* |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and
Rule 15d-14(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
|
31.2* |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and
Rule 15d-14(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
|
32.1* |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2* |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
The following materials from the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated
Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 and December 31; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements Comprehensive
Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010; (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 (v) Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (vi) Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text. In accordance with Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part
of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
|
|
|
101 XBRL |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
Submitted electronically with this report. |
|
|
|
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
Submitted electronically with this report. |
|
|
|
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
Submitted electronically with this report. |
|
|
|
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
Submitted electronically with this report. |
|
|
|
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
Submitted electronically with this report. |
|
|
|
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
Submitted electronically with this report. |
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ MONTY J. BENNETT
|
|
|
|
Monty J. Bennett |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ DAVID J. KIMICHIK
|
|
|
|
David J. Kimichik |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
48