Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
9341 Courtland Drive, N.E.
Rockford, Michigan 49351
March 26, 2019
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
Thank you for your investment in Wolverine Worldwide. We made significant progress in 2018 on our strategic and financial objectives, including:
In addition to overseeing the Company's execution on our Global Growth Agenda and other initiatives during 2018, the Board focused on other matters critical to the Company's long-term success. These included Board and management succession planning, cybersecurity protection and brand stewardship, which we describe in greater detail in this Proxy Statement.
Our impressive 2018 performance reflects the hard work and effort by our team over the last two years to transform the business to succeed in the fast-changing global retail environment. During 2019 the Wolverine team is fully engaged and laser focused on the global growth opportunities that exist for our portfolio of leading performance and lifestyle brands. We expect to continue to invest in a variety of initiatives to continue driving revenue growth and earnings leverage, and the Board will continue to lead the Company with a view toward continued success in 2019 and beyond. We hope to receive your support at this year's annual meeting on May 2, 2019, and encourage you to vote either online, by phone or by mail.
Sincerely,
Blake
W. Krueger
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 1 |
NOTICE OF 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
9341 Courtland Drive, NE
Rockford, MI 49351
March 26, 2019
To Our Shareholders:
We invite you to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") of Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (the "Company", "Wolverine Worldwide" or "Wolverine") at the Company's offices located at 9341 Courtland Drive, NE, Rockford, MI 49351, on May 2, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. EDT. At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote on the following items:
Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 11, 2019 can vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment of the Annual Meeting.
This Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement, proxy or voting instruction card and Annual Report for our fiscal year ended December 29, 2018 are being mailed or made available to shareholders starting on or about March 26, 2019.
Whether or not you plan to attend, you can ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting by promptly voting and submitting your proxy by telephone or through the internet, or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the enclosed envelope.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Kyle
L. Hanson
Secretary
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Statement Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 2, 2019.
Wolverine's Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2018, are available at: www.wolverineworldwide.com/2019annualmeeting.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 2 |
Table of Contents |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 3 |
This summary highlights key information that can be found in greater detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that shareholders should consider, and shareholders should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting.
Wolverine Worldwide organized its portfolio of brands into three key operating groups for fiscal 2018 as illustrated below:
Strategic Focus Global Growth Agenda
The Company continued to make important investments across its global business during 2018 within all three key elements of its Global Growth Agenda Powerful Product Creation Engine, Digital-Direct Offense and International Expansion. This growth agenda serves as a robust reinvestment framework to identify and prioritize a variety of strategic initiatives. We made approximately $41 million of investments during the year, with the focus on accelerating sustainable revenue growth.
Powerful Product Creation Engine
The first element of our Global Growth Agenda is focused on a more innovative and faster Powerful Product Creation Engine, and approximately 45% of the incremental investments in 2018 related to this area. Investments were made across a wide variety of initiatives including new creative talent to support implementation of the Brand Growth Model, and systems to streamline the product development process and accelerate speed-to-market.
Digital-Direct Offense
Significant investments were made during 2018 to advance the Digital-Direct Offense, which represented approximately 35% of the spend for the year. Investments were primarily focused on improving social prospecting capabilities, customer retention and developing a more constant flow of compelling new content. The transition to a new West Coast distribution center was also completed to support the growing eCommerce business. These investments directly impacted the Company's owned eCommerce business, which has been the fastest growing channel over the last two years with growth accelerating to nearly 30% during 2018.
International Expansion
The third element of the Global Growth Agenda is International Expansion, which represented approximately 20% of the investment spend during 2018. The Company focused on directly attacking international opportunities to make its products and brands more relevant in key global markets, and has added strategic and operational resources to regional international teams, especially in China. International grew at a mid-single digit rate during 2018, and this growth is expected to accelerate during 2019 as more direct investment is being targeted in Europe and Asia.
The early success associated with the Global Growth Agenda is very encouraging, and the Company is now positioned to complete the final stage of its transformation and expand on the initiatives and concepts that were validated in 2018. During 2019, the focus is to ensure that all brands fully incorporate these new skillsets, tools and processes.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 4 |
Shareholders are being asked to vote on the following matters at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
| | | | | | | | | | |
PROPOSAL |
BOARD VOTE RECOMMENDATION |
PAGE REFERENCE |
| |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 1. | Election of Directors for Terms Expiring in 2022 | FOR each Nominee | 12 | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Resolution Approving NEO Compensation | FOR | 66 | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Auditor for Fiscal Year 2019 | FOR | 67 | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2022
The Company's Board consists of 10 directors. The Company's By-Laws establish three classes of directors with each class being as nearly equal in number as possible and serving three-year terms.
The Board has nominated three directors for election at the Annual Meeting, as outlined in the table below. Each director nominee has been nominated to serve for a three-year term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2022. The Board recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" each of the nominees named below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Age |
Director Since |
Independent |
Other Public Directorships |
Committees |
Proposed Term Expiration |
| ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Jeffery M. Boromisa Retired Executive Vice President of Kellogg International, President of Latin America; Senior Vice President of Kellogg Company |
64 | 2006 | ✓ | None |
Audit Compensation |
2022 | | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Gina R. Boswell President, Customer Development, Unilever U.S.A. |
56 | 2013 | ✓ | ManpowerGroup Inc. |
Compensation Governance |
2022 | | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
David T. Kollat President and Chairman, 22, Inc. |
80 | 1992 | ✓ | L. Brands, Inc. |
Independent Lead Director |
2022 | | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following charts illustrate key characteristics of the Company's Board:
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 5 |
Board is Composed of Directors with the Right Mix of Skills and Experiences
The following chart lists the important experiences and attributes that the Company's Directors possess:
Our Board greatly values the views of our shareholders and has made meaningful changes to our compensation and governance programs over the last several years in response to shareholder feedback. For example, we made significant changes to our executive compensation program in 2017 after discussion with shareholders and other stakeholders. Shareholder response to these changes was overwhelmingly positive, which translated to 98% and 94% support in 2017 and 2018, respectively, for our say on pay proposal. As part of its ongoing shareholder engagement efforts, the Company reached out again in early 2019 to shareholders representing 54% of its outstanding shares and has held or expects to hold telephonic meetings with all shareholders who accepted (representing about 17.4% of outstanding shares). Discussions focused on Company strategy, financial performance, governance and compensation programs.
Corporate Governance Highlights
Wolverine Worldwide is committed to a governance structure that provides strong shareholder rights and meaningful accountability.
✓ Highly independent Board and Committees ✓ Lead Independent Director with clearly defined role ✓ Majority voting with director resignation policy ✓ No supermajority vote requirements ✓ Shareholder right to act by written consent |
✓ Annual Board and Committee self-evaluations ✓ Robust Board and executive succession planning, including annual written director nominee evaluations ✓ Long-standing commitment toward diversity ✓ Director onboarding orientation program ✓ Active shareholder engagement practices |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 6 |
What we do | What we do not do | |
✓ Vast majority of pay is at risk or variable, i.e., performance based or equity-based or both ✓ Stringent share ownership requirements (6x base salary for CEO) ✓ Broad-based clawback policy ✓ Significant vesting horizon for equity grants ✓ Double trigger equity acceleration (for grants in 2017 and after) ✓ Independent Compensation Committee Consultant ✓ Review executive compensation program to ensure it doesn't promote excessive risk taking ✓ Proactively engage with top shareholders on compensation and governance issues ✓ Conduct annual say-on-pay votes ✓ Balance short-term and long-term incentives |
✗ No dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance shares/units ✗ No repricing or replacing of underwater stock options ✗ No overlapping metrics ✗ No excessive or unnecessary perquisites ✗ No hedging, pledging, or short sales of Company stock ✗ No excise tax gross-ups in change-in-control agreements for new officers (hired after 2008) |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 7 |
Corporate Governance |
Wolverine Worldwide is committed to the highest level of corporate governance, and the Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to strengthen management accountability and promote long-term shareholder interests.
The shareholders elect directors to serve on the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors" or "Board"). The Board oversees the management of the business by the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and senior management. In addition to its general oversight function, the Board's additional responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the following:
The Board prides itself on its ability to recruit and retain directors who have high personal and professional integrity and have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment to effectively serve shareholders' long-term interests. These skills and attributes also link with the Company's most important strategic objectives, such as eCommerce and digital growth, brand building, operational excellence and supply chain management, and international growth. The Board also values diversity, as evidenced by the current makeup of the Board. The Board believes that its directors, including the nominees for election as directors at the Annual Meeting, have these characteristics and valuable skills that provide the Company with the variety and depth of knowledge, judgment and strategic vision necessary to provide effective oversight of the Company.
To help accomplish this, and to assist in succession planning, the Board, at the recommendation of the Governance Committee, has identified specified skills and attributes it desires its members to possess. The below graphic lists these skills and attributes and indicates which of the directors possess each. As shown, these skills and attributes are well represented within the Board.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 8 |
The Governance Committee reviews with the Board on an annual basis the appropriate skills and characteristics desired of Board members in the context of the current makeup of the Board. The Board, with the assistance of the Governance Committee, annually assesses the current composition of the Board across many dimensions. As set forth in the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are posted on its website, this assessment addresses the above referred skills and attributes and the individual performance, experience, age and skills of each director.
The Board's Governance Committee serves as its nominating committee. The Governance Committee, in anticipation of upcoming director elections and other potential or expected Board vacancies, evaluates qualified individuals and recommends candidates to the Board. The Governance Committee may retain a search firm or other external parties to assist it in identifying candidates, and the Governance Committee has the sole authority to approve the search firm's fees and retention terms, and to terminate the firm if necessary.
The Governance Committee considers candidates suggested by directors, senior management or shareholders. Shareholders may recommend individuals as potential director candidates by communicating with the Governance Committee through one of the Board communication mechanisms described under the heading "Shareholder Communications Policy." Shareholders that wish to nominate a director candidate must comply with the procedures set forth in the Company's By-Laws, which are posted on its website. Ultimately, upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, the Board selects the director nominees for election at each annual meeting. In selecting director nominees, the Board considers each candidate's performance as a director (which is assessed through an anonymous written peer evaluation), personal and professional integrity, ability and judgment, and likelihood to be effective, in conjunction with the other nominees and directors, in serving the long-term interests of the shareholders. The Governance Committee also considers candidates' relative skills, attributes, background and characteristics as well as independence under applicable New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") listing standards and the Company's Director Independence Standards, potential to contribute to the composition and culture of the Board, and ability and willingness to actively participate in the Board and committee meetings and to otherwise devote sufficient time to Board duties.
As part of an annual self-assessment, each director evaluates the performance of the Board and any committee on which he or she serves across a number of dimensions. Mr. Kollat, as the Lead Independent Director working with the Governance Committee, reviews the Board self-assessment with directors following the end of each fiscal year, and conducts individual director interviews at the end of each year. Committee Chairpersons review the committee self-assessments with their respective committee members and discuss them with the Board. In addition, the Governance Committee, working with the Lead Independent Director, develops and implements guidelines for evaluating all directors standing for nomination and re-election and oversees the evaluation of such nominees.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 9 |
The Corporate Governance Guidelines (including the Director Independence Standards), the Charter for each Board standing committee (Audit, Compensation and Governance), the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, By-Laws, Code of Business Conduct, and its Accounting and Finance Code of Ethics all are available on the Wolverine Worldwide website at: www.wolverineworldwide.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/
The Board and applicable committees annually review these and other key governance documents.
The Board oversees the Company's risk management and mitigation activities with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic, operational, financial, environmental, cybersecurity, and legal compliance risks. This oversight is conducted through presentations by and discussions with the CEO, Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), General Counsel or Associate General Counsel, Chief Information Officer, brand and department leaders and other members of management. The Vice President of Internal Audit and Risk Compliance coordinates management's day-to-day risk management and mitigation efforts, and reports directly to the Audit Committee.
The Vice President of Internal Audit and Risk Compliance reviews with the Audit Committee regularly, and with the full Board periodically, management's risk assessment and mitigation strategies. In addition to the above processes, the Board has delegated risk management and mitigation oversight responsibilities to its standing committees, which meet regularly to review and discuss specific risk topics that align with their core responsibilities.
The Company reviewed its compensation policies and practices to assess whether they are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. As part of this review, the Company compiled information about the Company's incentive plans, including reviewing the Company's compensation philosophy, evaluating key incentive plan design features and reviewing historic payout levels and pay mix. With assistance from Company management and its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee reviewed the executive compensation program, and managers from the Company's human resources and legal departments reviewed the non-executive compensation programs.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE CODE OF ETHICS
The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct for the Company's directors, officers and employees. The Board also has adopted an Accounting and Finance Code of Ethics ("Accounting and Finance Code") that focuses on the financial reporting process and applies to the Company's CEO, CFO and Corporate Controller.
The Company discloses amendments to or waivers from its Code of Business Conduct affecting directors or executive officers and amendments to or waivers from its Accounting and Finance Code on its website at: www.wolverineworldwide.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 10 |
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS POLICY
Shareholders and other interested parties may send correspondence to the Board, the non-employee directors as a group, a specific Board committee or an individual director (including the Lead Director) in the manner described below.
The General Counsel or Associate General Counsel will provide a summary and copies of all correspondence (other than solicitations for services, products or publications) as applicable at each regularly scheduled meeting.
Communications may be sent via email through various links on our website at:
www.wolverineworldwide.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/
or by regular mail c/o General Counsel, Wolverine World Wide, Inc., 9341 Courtland Drive, N.E., Rockford, MI 49351.
The General Counsel or Associate General Counsel will alert individual directors if an item warrants a prompt response from the individual director prior to the next regularly scheduled meeting. Items warranting a prompt response, but not addressed to a specific director, will be routed to the applicable committee Chairperson.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 11 |
Proposal 1 Election of |
The Company's Board consists of 10 directors. The Company's By-Laws establish three classes of directors, with each class being as nearly equal in number as possible and serving three-year terms. At each annual meeting, the term of one class expires. The Board has nominated three directors for election at the Annual Meeting: Jeffrey M. Boromisa, Gina R. Boswell and David T. Kollat. Each director has been nominated to serve for a three-year term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2022 or until his/her successor, if any, has been elected and is qualified.
All director nominees are independent directors, as determined by the Board under the applicable NYSE listing standards and the Company's Director Independence Standards. Each director nominee currently serves on the Board. The shareholders most recently elected Ms. Boswell and Messrs. Boromisa and Kollat at the Company's 2016 annual meeting.
The Company is not aware of any nominee who will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director. However, if a nominee is unable to serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, the incumbent directors may or may not select a substitute nominee. If the directors select a substitute nominee, the proxy holder will vote the shares represented by all valid proxies for the substitute nominee (unless other instructions are given).
The biographies of the three nominees and the other directors of the Company are below, along with a discussion of the experience and skills of each director.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 12 |
Director Nominees with |
| | | | | | |
JEFFREY M. BOROMISA |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 13 |
| | | | | | |
GINA R. BOSWELL |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 14 |
| | | | | | |
DAVID T. KOLLAT |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
||||||
The Board, which previously waived the age 72 retirement provision with respect to Dr. Kollat, has determined that it is in the best interests of stockholders for Dr. Kollat to continue to serve as a director, and, therefore, determined to
nominate him for an additional three-year term. |
BOARD RECOMMENDATION
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the election of the above nominees for proposed terms expiring in 2022.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 15 |
Directors with Terms |
| | | | | | |
WILLIAM K. GERBER |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 16 |
| | | | | | |
BLAKE W. KRUEGER |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 17 |
| | | | | | |
NICHOLAS T. LONG |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 18 |
| | | | | | |
MICHAEL A. VOLKEMA |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 19 |
Directors with Terms |
| | | | | | |
ROXANE DIVOL |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 20 |
| | | | | | |
JOSEPH R. GROMEK |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 21 |
| | | | | | |
BRENDA J. LAUDERBACK |
||||||
|
| Select Business Experience: |
| Board Committees: |
| Other Public Directorships: |
Career Highlights: |
||||||
Experience and Skills: |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 22 |
The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines give the Board the flexibility to determine the best leadership structure for the Company based upon the Company's evolving needs and opportunities. The Governance Committee periodically reviews the Board's leadership structure, including whether to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO, based upon the Board and Company's then-current circumstances, and recommends changes to the Board as appropriate. Currently, the Company's CEO also serves as the Chairman of the Board. In addition, since 1993, the independent directors have annually elected a lead independent director who functions in many ways similar to an independent Chairman. The Board continues to believe that this leadership structure is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders at this time and provides the Board with effective independent oversight of management. Specifically, the lead independent director has the following enumerated responsibilities:
The Board annually assesses the independence of all directors. To qualify as "independent," the Board must affirmatively determine that the director is independent under the Company's Director Independence Standards, which are modeled after the listing standards of the NYSE. Under NYSE listing standards, the Board has determined that 9 of the Company's 10 directors are independent. Only Mr. Krueger, the Company's CEO, is not independent. All of the Board's committees are comprised entirely of independent directors. The independent directors generally meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled meeting.
The Director Independence Standards define an "Independent Director" as a director who the Board determines otherwise has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company), and who:
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 23 |
BOARD COMMITTEES, MEETINGS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE
The Board has three standing committees: Audit, Compensation, and Governance. Each committee meets periodically throughout the year and reports its recommendations to the Board. The Company expects directors to attend every meeting of the Board and the committees on which they serve and to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. In 2018, all directors then serving on the Board attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and all directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board (5 meetings in 2018) and the committees on which they served. All directors are typically invited to and attend all committee meetings.
Each committee annually evaluates its performance to determine its effectiveness. The Board has determined that all committee members are "independent" as defined by NYSE listing standards. Furthermore, each Audit Committee member satisfies the NYSE "financial literacy" requirement. In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Boromisa and Mr. Gerber are "audit committee financial experts" under Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules. Each committee's charter, with a complete list of the duties and responsibilities is available on the Company's website at www.wolverineworldwide.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/.
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
|||||
| | | | | |
Committee Members |
| Gerber (Chair) Boromisa Divol Lauderback Volkema |
|||
| | | | | |
Number of Meetings in 2018 | | 6 | |||
| | | | | |
Highlighted Responsibilities | | Appoints, evaluates and oversees the work of the independent auditors and oversees the internal audit function Oversees the integrity of the Company's financial statements, financial reporting process and internal controls Oversees the Company's policies and systems regarding risk assessment and management and the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements |
|||
| | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 24 |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
|||||
| | | | | |
Committee Members |
| Long (Chair) Boromisa Boswell Gerber Gromek |
|||
| | | | | |
Number of Meetings in 2018 | | 6 | |||
| | | | | |
Highlighted Responsibilities | | Assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to executive compensation and the Company's compensation and benefit policies and programs Oversees the overall compensation structure, policies and programs, including whether the compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for management and employees Oversees the Company's management of risks relating to management resources, organization structure and succession planning, hiring, development and retention processes, as well as those relating to the Company's compensation structure, policies and programs |
|||
| | | | | |
|
|
|
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE |
|||||
| | | | | |
Committee Members |
| Volkema (Chair) Boswell Divol Gromek Lauderback Long |
|||
| | | | | |
Number of Meetings in 2018 | | 5 | |||
| | | | | |
Highlighted Responsibilities | | Assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities on matters and issues related to the Company's corporate governance practices In conjunction with the Board, establishes qualification standards for membership on the Board and its committees and recommends qualified individuals to become Board members or serve for re-election as directors Develops and recommends to the Board for its approval an annual self-evaluation process for the Board and its committees, and oversees the evaluation process |
|||
| | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 25 |
Non-Employee Director Compensation |
The Company's non-employee director compensation philosophy is to pay compensation that is competitive with the compensation paid by companies of similar size, in similar industries and with whom Wolverine Worldwide competes for director candidates. The Governance Committee, with input from management and from the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, reviewed director compensation and compared it to market data, including a comparison to director compensation for the Company's Peer Group, as defined on page 44, and broader industry market surveys (FW Cook 2016 Director Compensation Report and NACD 2016-2017 Compensation Report). Based on this review, non-employee director compensation for fiscal year 2018 was updated as follows compared to fiscal year 2017 compensation.
These changes were implemented to keep Wolverine director compensation near the median of its peer group. The update in form of equity grant was to align with market grant practices.
The following table provides information regarding the compensation of the Company's non-employee directors for fiscal year 2018. Mr. Krueger receives compensation for his services as the Company's CEO and President, but does not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director or chairman.
|
Fees Paid in Cash |
| |
Cash Amounts Voluntarily Deferred |
| |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Awards2 |
|
Totals |
|||||||||||
Boromisa |
$97,000 |
+ |
- |
= |
$97,000 |
+ |
$130,003 |
= |
$227,003 |
|||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Boswell |
$94,000 | + | - | = | $94,000 | + | $130,003 | = | $224,003 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Divol |
$97,000 | + | - | = | $97,000 | + | $130,003 | = | $227,003 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gerber |
$117,000 | + | - | = | $117,000 | + | $130,003 | = | $247,003 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gromek |
- | + | $101,500 | = | $101,500 | + | $130,003 | = | $231,503 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kollat |
$130,000 | + | - | = | $130,000 | + | $165,022 | = | $295,022 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lauderback |
$72,750 | + | $24,250 | = | $97,000 | + | $130,003 | = | $227,003 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long |
$101,500 | + | - | = | $101,500 | + | $130,003 | = | $231,503 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
O'Donovan |
$50,000 | + | - | = | $50,000 | + | $130,003 | = | $180,003 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Volkema |
$56,000 | + | $56,000 | = | $112,000 | + | $130,003 | = | $242,003 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 26 |
Name |
Option Awards Outstanding at December 29, 2018 (#) |
Restricted Stock Units held at December 29, 2018 (#) |
||||
Boromisa |
71,864 |
4,440 |
||||
| | | | | | |
Boswell |
44,735 | 4,440 | ||||
| | | | | | |
Divol |
40,002 | 4,440 | ||||
| | | | | | |
Gerber |
61,994 | 4,440 | ||||
| | | | | | |
Gromek |
71,864 | 4,440 | ||||
| | | | | | |
Kollat |
84,166 | 5,636 | ||||
| | | | | | |
Lauderback |
61,994 | 4,440 | ||||
| | | | | | |
Long |
60,642 | 4,440 | ||||
| | | | | | |
O'Donovan |
61,994 | - | ||||
| | | | | | |
Volkema |
55,326 | 4,440 | ||||
| | | | | | |
The following table shows the non-employee director compensation program for fiscal year 2018:
| | | Compensation Plan for 2018 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Component | | | Cash | Restricted Stock Units1 | ||||
Annual Director Fee |
|
|
$70,000 |
|
Number of restricted stock units "RSUs" with a grant date value of $130,000. |
|
||
| | | | | | | | |
Audit Committee Annual Fee | | | $15,000 | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Audit Committee Chairperson Annual Fee | | | $25,000 | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Compensation Committee Annual Fee | | | $12,000 | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Compensation Committee Chairperson Annual Fee | | | $20,000 | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Governance Committee Annual Fee | | | $12,000 | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Governance Committee Chairperson Annual Fee | | | $15,000 | | | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Lead Director Annual Fee | | | In lieu of the standard Annual Director Fee, the Lead Director was paid a Cash Retainer of $135,000. | | In lieu of the standard RSU grant, the Lead Director received a number of RSUs with a grant date value of $165,000. | | ||
| | | | | | | | |
The Company also:
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 27 |
2019 Updates. After a review of Wolverine's director compensation program compared to both its peer group and broader industry market surveys (FW Cook 2017 Director Compensation Report and NACD 2017-2018 Compensation Report), the Company modified director compensation as follows for 2019.
These changes were implemented to keep Wolverine's director compensation near the median of its peer group.
Director Deferred Compensation Plan. The Company's Amended and Restated Outside Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Director Deferred Compensation Plan") is a supplemental nonqualified deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors. A separate non-employee director deferred compensation plan applies to benefits accrued under that plan before January 1, 2005. The Director Deferred Compensation Plan permits all non-employee directors to voluntarily defer, at their option, 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of their director fees. The Company establishes a book account for each non-employee director and credits the director's account with a number of stock units equal to the amounts voluntarily deferred, divided by the closing market price of common stock on the payment/deferral date. The Company also credits director accounts with dividend equivalents on amounts previously deferred in the form of additional stock units. The amounts credited to director accounts are treated as if invested in Wolverine Worldwide common stock. The number of stock units held in director accounts is set forth under the "Stock Ownership By Management and Others" table below.
Upon a director's termination of service, or such later date as a director selects, the Company will distribute the stock units in the director's book account in shares of Wolverine Worldwide common stock in either a single, lump sum distribution or annual installment distributions over a period of up to 20 years (10 years under the plan for benefits accrued before January 1, 2005). The Company converts each stock unit to one share of Wolverine Worldwide common stock.
Upon a "change in control," the Company will distribute to the director, in a single, lump sum distribution, Wolverine Worldwide common stock in a number of shares equal to the stock units credited to a director's book account. The Deferred Compensation Plan defines "change in control" as any of the following:
Deferred Compensation Plan. For a description of the non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan under which Directors may also defer cash fees, please see the "Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation" section on page 59.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
Each non-employee director must attain (and maintain) a minimum stock ownership level (including owned shares, the in the money value of stock options, and stock units under the Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan) equal to six times the non-employee director annual cash retainer prior to being able to gift or sell any Company stock. During 2018, all non-employee directors were in compliance with these guidelines.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 28 |
Securities Ownership of Officers and Directors and Certain Beneficial Owners |
The following table sets forth information about those holders known by Wolverine Worldwide to be the beneficial owners of more than five percent of Wolverine Worldwide's outstanding shares of common stock as of March 11, 2019:
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock |
||||||||||||
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
| Sole Voting Power |
| Sole Investment Power |
| Shared Voting Power |
| Shared Investment Power |
| Total Beneficial Ownership |
| Percent of Class3 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
BlackRock, Inc.1 |
| 13,548,359 | | 13,830,159 | | - | | - | | 13,830,159 | | 15.4% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Vanguard Group2 |
| 194,464 | | 9,315,339 | | 12,875 | | 198,019 | | 9,513,358 | | 10.6% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 29 |
STOCK OWNERSHIP BY MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS
The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned as of March 11, 2019, by each of the Company's directors and named executive officers and all of the Company's directors and executive officers as a group:
|
|
| Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock1 | ||||||||||
| |
|
Deferred Stock Units, Sole Voting and/or Investment Power2,3 |
Shared Voting or Investment Power4 |
Stock Options5 |
Total Beneficial Ownership |
Percent of Class6 |
||||||
| Jeffrey M. Boromisa |
| 76,113 | | 34,282 | | 61,994 | | 172,389 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gina R. Boswell |
| 16,038 | | | | 44,735 | | 60,773 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Roxane Divol |
| 21,970 | | | | 40,002 | | 61,972 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| William K. Gerber |
| 43,913 | | | | 55,326 | | 99,239 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Joseph R. Gromek |
| 118,902 | | | | 61,994 | | 180,896 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David T. Kollat |
| 310,234 | | | | 75,296 | | 385,530 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Michael Jeppesen |
| 51,138 | | | | 51,988 | | 103,126 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Blake W. Krueger |
| 780,688 | | 29,889 | | 1,328,392 | | 2,138,969 | | 2.34% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Brenda J. Lauderback |
| 67,599 | | | | 55,326 | | 122,925 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nicholas T. Long |
| 23,349 | | | | 60,642 | | 83,991 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Michael D. Stornant |
| 136,341 | | | | 145,842 | | 282,183 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Michael A. Volkema |
| 68,738 | | | | 55,326 | | 124,064 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Richard J. Woodworth |
| 79,846 | | | | 105,177 | | 185,023 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| James D. Zwiers |
| 71,387 | | 176,158 | | 230,588 | | 478,133 | | * | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| All directors and executive officers as a group (17 people) |
| 1,920,872 | | 240,329 | | 2,395,769 | | 4,556,970 | | 4.93% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
Restricted Units |
Performance Units |
|||
| Krueger |
| 134,806 | | 404,512 | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Jeppesen |
| 25,393 | | 49,015 | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Stornant |
| 30,281 | | 58,454 | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Woodworth |
| 26,819 | | 52,168 | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Zwiers |
| 28,477 | | 55,393 | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 30 |
Compensation Discussion |
The Company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") provides an overview and analysis of the executive compensation program for the Company's named executive officers ("NEOs"). For 2018, the Company's NEOs were: | ||
Blake W. Krueger |
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
Michael Jeppesen |
President, Global Operations Group and Wolverine Heritage Group | |
Michael D. Stornant |
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
Richard J. Woodworth |
President, Wolverine Boston Group | |
James D. Zwiers |
Executive Vice President |
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
The Company's compensation philosophy is to provide executives with a competitive compensation package that is heavily weighted towards performance-based (performance shares and annual bonus opportunity) and variable (restricted stock units) compensation in order to encourage superior business and financial performance over the short and longer term and, by linking compensation with stock price performance, to closely align the interests of the Company's NEOs with those of its shareholders without encouraging excessive risk-taking. The Compensation Committee (the "Committee") oversees the Company's executive compensation program.
The executive compensation program has four primary objectives:
Compensation Decisions in Context: Key 2018 Accomplishments and Financial Highlights; 2019 Focus
2018 was a successful year for the Company as it executed on the Global Growth Agenda, with solid underlying revenue growth achieved across the portfolio including several of the largest brands. Key financial highlights for the Company during 2018 included the following:
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 31 |
2018 Compensation Program Overview
The Company's executive compensation program consists of base salary, annual bonus opportunity, long-term incentive compensation, and benefits. A breakdown of base salary, annual performance bonus, and long-term incentive compensation is illustrated below:
ELEMENT |
|
COMPONENT |
|
METRICS |
|
WHAT THE PAY ELEMENT REWARDS |
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Base
|
Cash
|
Fixed amount based on responsibilities, experience and market data
|
Scope of core responsibilities, years of experience, and potential to affect the Company's overall performance
|
|||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Annual
|
Company/Business Unit Cash Bonus Individual Cash Bonus Backlog Modifier
|
85% revenue and adjusted pretax earnings 15% specific individualized performance targets Total payout adjusted up/down up to plus or minus 25% based on year-end backlog modifier
|
Achieving specific corporate business and/or divisional objectives over which the NEO has reasonable control Achieving specific personal objectives Achieving key financial metric, consistent with communicated objectives
|
|||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term
|
Performance share units Time-vesting restricted stock units
|
Uses the following performance metrics (weighted as indicated) 65% Adjusted earnings per share 35% Adjusted business value-added Relative TSR adjusted total payout up/down up to plus or minus 25% Four-year vesting for time- vested restricted stock units
|
Balances focus on near-term profitability with longer-term shareholder value creation Achieving long-term corporate objectives Driving long-term shareholder value Continued, long-term employment at Wolverine Worldwide Adjusted to increase (or reduce) payout based on relative TSR performance
|
|||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 32 |
Under the Company's compensation program, a significant portion of the compensation awarded to the NEOs generally, and to the CEO in particular, is at risk (contingent upon the attainment of various pre-established short and long-term financial goals) and variable (contingent on the performance of the Company's stock price). NEO compensation that is significantly at risk and variable incentivizes superior business and financial performance and, by linking compensation with stock price performance, aligns the interests of executives with those of shareholders.
The following graphic illustrates the percentage of 2018 NEO target compensation that is at risk:
2018 Target Total Compensation
CEO
Average NEOS
Long-Term Incentive Program Mix
The long-term incentive program is heavily weighted to at-risk compensation, with a mix of 70% performance stock units and 30% time vested restricted stock units for the CEO. For other NEOs, the 2018 mix was 60% performance stock units and 40% time vested restricted stock units.
What we do | What we do not do | |
✓ Vast majority of pay is at risk or variable, i.e. , performance based or equity-based or both ✓ Stringent share ownership requirements (6x base salary for CEO) ✓ Broad-based clawback policy ✓ Significant vesting horizon for equity grants ✓ Double trigger equity acceleration (for grants in 2017 and beyond) ✓ Independent Compensation Committee Consultant ✓ Review executive compensation program to ensure it doesn't promote excessive risk taking ✓ Proactively engage with top shareholders on compensation and governance issues ✓ Conduct annual say-on-pay votes ✓ Balance short-term and long-term incentives |
✗ No dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance shares/units ✗ No repricing or replacing of underwater stock options ✗ No overlapping metrics ✗ No excessive or unnecessary perquisites ✗ No hedging, pledging, or short sales of Company stock ✗ No excise tax gross-ups in change-in-control agreements for new officers (hired after 2008) |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 33 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2018 COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Each February, the Committee recommends (and the independent directors approve) target compensation for the CEO for the upcoming year after considering the latest available information, including the Company's TSR and other business and financial performance, information provided by the Committee's compensation consultant regarding executive compensation trends and compensation paid to other chief executive officers of companies in the compensation peer group (described below), and information provided by management on recent Company performance and the Company's future business and financial outlook. The Committee's goal is to set the CEO's compensation in line with the anticipated market median compensation for that year.
Given the significant weight the Company's executive compensation program places on at risk and variable compensation, the compensation realized by the CEO and NEOs can be significantly affected, both positively and negatively, by performance against the various operational and financial performance metrics pre-established by the Committee and by the performance of the Company's stock. The Board and Committee believe such a compensation program aligns the interests of the CEO and other NEOs with the interests of the shareholders.
The Company's executive compensation program consists of four primary elements: base salary, annual bonus opportunity, long- term incentive compensation and benefits. These elements are described in greater detail below.
As part of approving an NEO's base salary, the Committee considers a variety of factors including individual responsibilities, experience, skills, and potential to affect Wolverine Worldwide's overall performance, as well as market surveys and peer group information. The Committee considers these compensation factors subjectively, and no single factor or combination of factors was determinative in setting base salaries for any NEO for fiscal 2018.
Based on the above factors, the Committee approved the 2018 base salaries for the NEOs as noted in the following table. The Committee held CEO salary flat in 2018 for the fifth year in a row and held it flat again in 2019. The 2-6% base salary increases for Messrs. Jeppesen, Stornant, Woodworth and Zwiers were based on their performance evaluations as well as consideration of peer group and broad-based industry compensation data, as described in detail below.
Name |
2018 Base Salary | 2017 Base Salary | ||
Krueger |
| $1,150,000 | | $1,150,000 |
| | | | |
Jeppesen |
| $607,000 | | $589,000 |
| | | | |
Stornant |
| $600,000 | | $564,000 |
| | | | |
Woodworth |
| $580,000 | | $564,000 |
| | | | |
Zwiers |
| $670,000 | | $658,000 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 34 |
In 2018, each NEO had the opportunity to earn annual cash incentive compensation ("annual bonus"), consisting of a performance bonus and an individual performance bonus, and further subject to a modifier:
Key Factors | 2018 Company Metrics | |||
Performance Bonus | Based on performance measured against Company and/or business unit performance criteria established at the beginning of 2018 Payout determined by comparing performance against four performance levels set for each pre-set criterion: threshold (25% payout), target (100% payout), goal (150% payout) and stretch (200% payout) |
Revenue (45%) Adjusted pretax earnings (55%) |
||
| | | | |
Individual Performance Bonus |
Measured against individual performance criteria Each NEO's payout was determined by comparing individual performance against specific individual criteria set at the beginning of 2018 Payouts can range from 0% to 200% depending on the NEO's performance against individual performance objectives |
Vary by each NEO |
||
| | | | |
Modifier | Total payout based on the above two components adjusted up or down by up to 25% based on year-end backlog |
+/- 25% year-end backlog modifier |
||
| | | | |
A percentage of each NEO's 2018 base salary was set as the annual bonus target percentage (the "Target Bonus Percentage"). The Target Bonus Percentage represents the percentage of each NEO's base salary that could be earned as annual incentive compensation at a "target" performance level (100% payout) for each of the performance bonus and individual performance bonus. Generally, the Committee sets higher Target Bonus Percentages for individuals with greater influence on business strategy, profit or sales. This puts a larger percentage of an NEO's total potential cash compensation at risk, in line with the NEO's ability to influence these factors. For 2018, the NEOs had the following Target Bonus Percentages: Mr. Krueger 125%, Mr. Jeppesen 55%, Mr. Stornant 60%, Mr. Woodworth 55%, Mr. Zwiers 55%.
The Committee selected fiscal year 2018 revenue and adjusted pretax earnings as metrics for the performance bonus because it believes a strong correlation exists between performance on these financial measures and increases in shareholder value. The Committee also added a year-end backlog modifier for 2018 to more directly align with the Company's focus on go-forward revenue growth. The change from the adjusted operating margin modifier used in 2017 to the backlog modifier used in 2018 and the increased revenue weighting in 2018 compared to 2017 reflects the Company's shift in focus from its Wolverine Way Forward operational transformation to its revenue-focused Global Growth Agenda.
Messrs. Krueger and Stornant had significant influence on the Company's overall business performance and, accordingly, their respective performance bonus opportunity (85% of their total annual bonus opportunity) is based on the Company performance criteria only. Messrs. Jeppesen, Woodworth and Zwiers were directly responsible for specific business units and exert a significant influence on those business units in particular, in addition to influencing Company performance. Accordingly, for each of these NEOs, a larger percentage of their overall annual bonus opportunity was based on business unit performance, with a smaller percentage based on the Company's performance, as reflected in the table on page 39.
As shown in the table below, the Committee also set four performance levels for each criterion: threshold (25% payout), target (100% payout), goal (150% payout) and stretch (200% payout). The Committee set the revenue and pretax earnings goals for these performance levels following a review of the Company's operating plan, historical performance, and industry and macroeconomic conditions. The revenue performance targets, though slightly lower than 2017 targets, were set aggressively in light of the difficult industry and macroeconomic conditions. Revenue performance at target (100%) was set above the mid-point of the Company's initial 2018 guidance, and goal performance (150%) was set above the top end of the guidance. Despite the planned decrease in revenue, the Committee set adjusted pretax earnings targets 13% higher than 2017, reflecting the expectation of improved adjusted profitability driven by the 2017 Wolverine Way Forward transformation.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 35 |
Company Performance Level |
in millions | ||||
| | | | | |
(% of Target Payout)1 | Revenue2 | Adjusted Pretax Earnings2,3 | |||
Threshold (25%) | | $2,145 | | $211.8 | |
| | | | | |
Target (100%) | | $2,290 | | $239.7 | |
| | | | | |
Goal (150%) | | $2,358 | | $256.5 | |
| | | | | |
Stretch (200%) | | $2,448 | | $273.3 | |
| | | | | |
For each business unit, the Committee sets the revenue and adjusted pretax earnings goals at substantially similar levels of difficulty as the goals for the Company and with a similar degree of difficulty as in prior years. The below table shows historical weighted performance levels achieved by the business units using these performance criteria for the years for which a meaningful comparison can be made.
Historical Group Performance1 | ||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
Wolverine Boston Group | Between threshold and target | Between threshold and target | Between threshold and target | Below threshold | Below threshold | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Wolverine Heritage Group | Between threshold and target | Between threshold and target | Between threshold and target | Below threshold | Between target and goal | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
International Group | Between target and goal | Between target and goal | Between target and goal | Between target and goal | Between goal and stretch | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
eCommerce | Between threshold and target | Between target and goal | Between threshold and target | N/A | N/A | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Stores | Between threshold and target | Between threshold and target | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
In February 2019, the Committee certified actual 2018 performance compared to the performance levels for the Company and business unit criteria. The Company's fiscal year 2018 revenue was approximately $2.239 billion, which was between threshold and target level. The Company's adjusted pretax earnings for fiscal year 2018 were $245.1 million, which was between target and goal level. The weighted average results for the applicable performance criterion are shown in the below table:
2018 Performance | Overall Weighted Payout by Group | |||
Wolverine Boston Group | Between threshold and target | 80% | ||
| | | | |
Wolverine Heritage Group | Between threshold and target | 69% | ||
| | | | |
Wolverine Worldwide | Between threshold and target | 93% | ||
| | | | |
International Group | Between target and goal | 101% | ||
| | | | |
eCommerce | Between threshold and target | 50% | ||
| | | | |
Stores | Between threshold and target | 51% | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 36 |
For 2018, the Company paid the NEOs the following amounts relating to the performance bonus.
Name |
Performance Bonus (as a % of Total Annual Bonus Opportunity)1 |
Performance Bonus Opportunity (as a % of an NEO's Target Percentage)1 |
Performance Bonus Percentage Earned1,2,3 |
Performance Bonus Paid1,2,3 | |||||
Krueger | 85% | 0 - 200% | 94% | $1,143,485 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | |
Jeppesen | 85% | 0 - 200% | 78% | $220,432 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | |
Stornant | 85% | 0 - 200% | 94% | $283,064 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | |
Woodworth | 85% | 0 - 200% | 85% | $228,897 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | |
Zwiers | 85% | 0 - 200% | 77% | $241,795 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | |
At the same time Target Bonus Percentages are set, the CEO approves measurable personal objectives for each NEO's individual bonus, other than for himself. The CEO submits, and the Committee reviews and approves, with such changes as it considers appropriate, the CEO's personal objectives. Such measurable personal objectives may include goals such as executing strategies supporting the Company's vision, developing employees, growing new business initiatives and driving operational excellence. Performance is evaluated by the CEO (or, in the case of the CEO, by the Committee and the other independent directors) based on qualitative and quantitative factors. Summaries of the specific personal objectives for each NEO are outlined in the table below:
NEO | 2018 Personal Objectives | |
Krueger | transformation scorecard, organic growth, cash flow | |
| | |
Jeppesen | transformation scorecard, backlog, successful implementation of PLM and PDM, senior leadership development | |
| | |
Stornant | transformation scorecard, organic growth, protect company investments and market share | |
| | |
Woodworth | transformation scorecard, backlog, senior leadership development | |
| | |
Zwiers | transformation scorecard, revenue growth, individual development plan achievement | |
| | |
Each personal objective is given a rating from "does not achieve" to "exceptional," with weighted performance ratings and payouts consistent with the following table:
Personal Objectives Rating | 2018 Payout Level | |||||
Exceptional | | | 200% | | | |
| | | | |||
Far Exceeds | | | 175% | | | |
| | | | |||
Exceeds | | | 150% | | | |
| | | | |||
Achieves | | | 100% | | | |
| | | | |||
Achieves Some But Not All | | | 50% | | | |
| | | | |||
Does Not Achieve | | | 0% | | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 37 |
The CEO recommended, and the Committee approved, the 2018 cumulative weighted personal objectives scores and payout levels for each of the NEOs other than himself. The Committee and the other independent directors of the Board met with the CEO at the end of the year to evaluate his performance against his personal objectives. The Committee determined the cumulative weighted personal objectives score for the CEO and recommended to the independent directors of the Board the CEO's payout level.
Name |
Individual Performance Bonus (as a % of Total Annual Bonus Opportunity) |
2018 Individual Bonus Opportunity (as a % of an NEO's Target Percentage) |
2018 Individual Bonus Percentage Achieved |
2018 Individual Bonus Paid |
| |||||
Krueger |
| 15% | | 0 - 200% | | 108% | | $232,659 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Jeppesen |
| 15% | | 0 - 200% | | 100% | | $49,792 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Stornant |
| 15% | | 0 - 200% | | 100% | | $53,377 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Woodworth |
| 15% | | 0 - 200% | | 113% | | $53,546 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Zwiers |
| 15% | | 0 - 200% | | 94% | | $51,642 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The Committee added a backlog modifier for 2018 to align with the Company's shift in focus to go-forward revenue growth upon completion of its Wolverine Way Forward operational transformation. The Committee set the following backlog modifier for 2018.
Company Backlog1,2 |
||
Achieved Backlog Growth |
| +2x |
| | |
Maintained Backlog Growth |
| No Adjustment |
| | |
Did Not Achieve Backlog Growth |
| 2x |
| | |
Brand/Group Backlog1,2 |
||
Exceeded Backlog Growth Threshold |
| +3x |
| | |
Achieved Backlog Target Growth Threshold |
| No Adjustment |
| | |
Did Not Achieve Backlog Growth Threshold |
| 2x |
| | |
At the Company level, a 2x modification was applied to each percentage increase (positive modification) or decrease (negative modification), capped at +/ 25%, based on average backlog at the end of the last three weeks of the 2018 fiscal year compared to the same periods during the 2017 fiscal year. At the brand/group level, a 3x positive modification was applied to each percent increase above a target backlog growth threshold and a 2x negative modification was applied to each percent below the target growth threshold, measured at the same time and with the same 25% cap as the Company calculation. The resulting modifications are reflected in the table below in the "Backlog Multiplier" column.
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 38 |
Each NEO's total annual bonus opportunity for 2018 ranged from 0% to 200% of the Target Bonus Percentage before applying the backlog modifier. The accompanying table shows the aggregate annual incentive compensation payout earned by each NEO for 2018, as well as the portion of that aggregate number that is attributable to the performance bonus and individual performance bonus and the effect of the backlog modifier.
|
Overall NEO annual bonus paid out at near target levels, including for the CEO, in a year when the Company's TSR performance was at the 61st percentile of its peer group. Further, the following graph shows the CEO's target bonus opportunity compared to his actual annual bonus earned over the last three years, which demonstrates the Company's pay for performance philosophy in action. There is clear directional alignment between the Company's TSR performance and the CEO's annual bonus achievement over this period, during which the
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 39 |
Company's TSR performance was at the 96th percentile of its peer group. The CEO's target annual bonus opportunity was not increased over this timeframe.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
In 2018, each NEO had the opportunity to earn long-term incentive compensation comprised of a mix of performance share units and time-based restricted stock unit awards.
Key Factors | Performance Share Metrics1 | |||
Performance Share Units | Performance share units are based on performance criteria covering three-year periods Awards balance focus on near term profitability with longer term shareholder value creation |
Fully diluted adjusted EPS (65%) Adjusted Business Value Added ("BVA")2 (35%) |
||
| | | | |
Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards | Encourages employee retention and rewards increases in stock price |
|||
| | | | |
The Committee believes EPS is a key metric that plays an important role in driving shareholder value and that it further aligns the interests of the NEOs with other shareholders. The Committee believes that BVA is useful for determining incentive compensation because it ties the income statement (profit delivery) to the balance sheet (effective asset utilization) and does not focus on one to the exclusion of the other. The Committee further believes that focusing NEOs' interests on increasing BVA aligns their interests more closely with shareholder interests. The use of both EPS and BVA balances the NEOs' focus on near term profitability with longer term shareholder value. Shareholders gave positive feedback on these measures during the Committee's shareholder outreach. The Committee weighted EPS 65%
| | | | |
2019 PROXY STATEMENT | 40 |
and BVA 35% when determining the overall performance level. For the 2018-2020 performance period, the Committee added a relative TSR modifier that provides a 25% positive adjustment to total payout for TSR performance in the top quartile of the Company's peer group and a 25% negative adjustment to total payout for performance in the bottom quartile of the peer group.
The Committee has chosen to provide long-term incentives in these forms because they incentivize and motivate different behaviors. Performance share units reward the achievement of key business criteria. Time-based restricted stock units encourage employee retention by providing some level of value to executives who remain employed during the vesting period. The use of restricted stock units also supports an ownership culture and thereby encourages executives to take actions that are best for the Company's long-term success. Both forms of long-term incentive compensation reward increased Company stock price.
The following table lists the performance levels set by the Committee for performance share awards granted for the 2016-2018 performance period, the vesting of which occurred on February 6, 2019 following the Committee's certification of 2016-2018 financial results.
Performance Level |
Cumulative EPS for the 2016-2018 period1 |
Cumulative BVA for the 2016-2018 period1 (in millions) |
||
Threshold (50%) |