Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

Wolverine World Wide, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
9341 Courtland Drive, N.E.
Rockford, Michigan 49351

March 26, 2019

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

Thank you for your investment in Wolverine Worldwide. We made significant progress in 2018 on our strategic and financial objectives, including:

In addition to overseeing the Company's execution on our Global Growth Agenda and other initiatives during 2018, the Board focused on other matters critical to the Company's long-term success. These included Board and management succession planning, cybersecurity protection and brand stewardship, which we describe in greater detail in this Proxy Statement.

Our impressive 2018 performance reflects the hard work and effort by our team over the last two years to transform the business to succeed in the fast-changing global retail environment. During 2019 the Wolverine team is fully engaged and laser focused on the global growth opportunities that exist for our portfolio of leading performance and lifestyle brands. We expect to continue to invest in a variety of initiatives to continue driving revenue growth and earnings leverage, and the Board will continue to lead the Company with a view toward continued success in 2019 and beyond. We hope to receive your support at this year's annual meeting on May 2, 2019, and encourage you to vote either online, by phone or by mail.

Sincerely,

GRAPHIC

Blake W. Krueger
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

1


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

NOTICE OF 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

10:00 a.m. EDT, May 2, 2019

Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
9341 Courtland Drive, NE
Rockford, MI 49351

March 26, 2019

To Our Shareholders:

We invite you to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") of Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (the "Company", "Wolverine Worldwide" or "Wolverine") at the Company's offices located at 9341 Courtland Drive, NE, Rockford, MI 49351, on May 2, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. EDT. At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote on the following items:

Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 11, 2019 can vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment of the Annual Meeting.

This Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement, proxy or voting instruction card and Annual Report for our fiscal year ended December 29, 2018 are being mailed or made available to shareholders starting on or about March 26, 2019.

Whether or not you plan to attend, you can ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting by promptly voting and submitting your proxy by telephone or through the internet, or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the enclosed envelope.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

GRAPHIC

Kyle L. Hanson
Secretary

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Statement Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 2, 2019.

Wolverine's Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2018, are available at: www.wolverineworldwide.com/2019annualmeeting.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

2


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Letter to Shareholders

  1

Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

  2

Proxy Statement Summary

  4

Our Brand Portfolio

  4

Strategic Focus – Global Growth Agenda

  4

Matters to be Voted Upon

  5

Election of Directors for Terms Expiring in 2022

  5

Board Highlights

  5

Board is Composed of Directors with the Right Mix of Skills and Experiences

  6

Shareholder Engagement

  6

Corporate Governance Highlights

  6

Compensation Best Practices

  7

Corporate Governance

  8

Board of Directors

  8

Board Composition

  8

Board Highlights

  8

Director Nominations

  9

Board Self-Assessment

  9

Risk Oversight

  10

Code of Business Conduct and Accounting and Finance Code of Ethics

  10

Shareholder Communications Policy

  11

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors for Terms Expiring in 2022

  12

Director Nominees with Proposed Terms Expiring in 2022

  13

Directors with Terms Expiring in 2020

  16

Directors with Terms Expiring in 2021

  20

Board Leadership

  23

Director Independence

  23

Board Committees, Meetings and Meeting Attendance

  24

Non-Employee Director Compensation in Fiscal Year 2018

  26

Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

  28

Securities Ownership of Officers and Directors and Certain Beneficial Owners

  29

Five Percent Shareholders

  29

Stock Ownership by Management and Others

  30

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

  31

Summary

  31

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

  31

Compensation Decisions in Context: Key 2018 Accomplishments and Financial Highlights; 2019 Focus

  31

2018 Compensation Program Overview

  32

Pay at Risk

  33

Long-Term Incentive Program Mix

  33

Compensation Best Practices

  33

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

  34

2018 Compensation Program Overview

  34

Setting Targets

  34

Base Salary

  34

Annual Bonus

  35

Performance Bonus

  35

Individual Performance Bonus

  37

Backlog Modifier

  38

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

  40

2016-2018 Performance Shares

  41

2018 Performance Share Awards

  41

Restricted Stock Unit Awards

  42

Benefits

  42

Retirement, Deferred Compensation and Welfare Plans

  42

Perquisites

  43

Post-Employment Compensation

  43

Say on Pay Advisory Vote

  43

Compensation Setting Process

  44

Setting Targets

  44

Competitive Philosophy and Competitive Market Data

  44

Peer Group

  44

CEO Role

  44

Compensation Consultant Role

  45

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

  45

NEO Stock Ownership Guidelines

  45

Stock Hedging and Pledging Policies

  45

Clawback Policy

  46

Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatments on Compensation

  46

Compensation Committee Report

  47

Summary Compensation Table

  48

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2018

  50

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018 Fiscal Year-End

  52

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2018

  56

Pension Plans and 2018 Pension Benefits

  57

Qualified Pension Plans

  57

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

  57

Pension Benefits in Fiscal Year 2018

  58

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

  59

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

  59

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

  60

Benefits Triggered by Termination for Cause or Voluntary Termination

  60

Benefits Triggered by Termination Other Than for Cause or for Good Reason

  60

Benefits Triggered Upon a Change in Control

  60

Benefits Triggered by Retirement, Death or Permanent Disability

  62

Description of Restrictive Covenants that Apply During and After Termination of Employment

  63

Estimated Payments on Termination or Change in Control

  63

CEO Pay Ratio

  65

Proposal 2 – Advisory Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation

  66

Proposal 3 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  67

Audit Committee Report

  68

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  70

Related Party Matters

  71

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

  71

Related Person Transactions Policy

  71

Additional Information

  72

Shareholders List

  72

Director and Officer Indemnification

  72

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

  72

Shareholder Proposals for Inclusion in Next Year's Proxy Statement

  72

Other Shareholder Proposals for Presentation at Next Year's Annual Meeting

  72

Voting Securities

  72

Conduct of Business

  73

Vote Required for Election and Approval

  73

Voting Results of the Annual Meeting

  73

Attending the Annual Meeting

  73

Manner for Voting Proxies

  74

Revocation of Proxies

  74

Solicitation of Proxies

  74

Delivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address

  74

Access to Proxy Statement and Annual Report

  74

Appendix A – Forward-Looking Statements and Non-GAAP Reconciliation Tools

  A-1

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

3


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement Summary

This summary highlights key information that can be found in greater detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that shareholders should consider, and shareholders should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting.

Our Brand Portfolio

Wolverine Worldwide organized its portfolio of brands into three key operating groups for fiscal 2018 as illustrated below:

GRAPHIC

Strategic Focus — Global Growth Agenda

The Company continued to make important investments across its global business during 2018 within all three key elements of its Global Growth Agenda — Powerful Product Creation Engine, Digital-Direct Offense and International Expansion. This growth agenda serves as a robust reinvestment framework to identify and prioritize a variety of strategic initiatives. We made approximately $41 million of investments during the year, with the focus on accelerating sustainable revenue growth.

Powerful Product Creation Engine

The first element of our Global Growth Agenda is focused on a more innovative and faster Powerful Product Creation Engine, and approximately 45% of the incremental investments in 2018 related to this area. Investments were made across a wide variety of initiatives including new creative talent to support implementation of the Brand Growth Model, and systems to streamline the product development process and accelerate speed-to-market.

Digital-Direct Offense

Significant investments were made during 2018 to advance the Digital-Direct Offense, which represented approximately 35% of the spend for the year. Investments were primarily focused on improving social prospecting capabilities, customer retention and developing a more constant flow of compelling new content. The transition to a new West Coast distribution center was also completed to support the growing eCommerce business. These investments directly impacted the Company's owned eCommerce business, which has been the fastest growing channel over the last two years — with growth accelerating to nearly 30% during 2018.

International Expansion

The third element of the Global Growth Agenda is International Expansion, which represented approximately 20% of the investment spend during 2018. The Company focused on directly attacking international opportunities to make its products and brands more relevant in key global markets, and has added strategic and operational resources to regional international teams, especially in China. International grew at a mid-single digit rate during 2018, and this growth is expected to accelerate during 2019 as more direct investment is being targeted in Europe and Asia.

The early success associated with the Global Growth Agenda is very encouraging, and the Company is now positioned to complete the final stage of its transformation and expand on the initiatives and concepts that were validated in 2018. During 2019, the focus is to ensure that all brands fully incorporate these new skillsets, tools and processes.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

4


Table of Contents

MATTERS TO BE VOTED UPON

Shareholders are being asked to vote on the following matters at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

                     
    PROPOSAL

BOARD VOTE
RECOMMENDATION


PAGE
REFERENCE


         
    1.   Election of Directors for Terms Expiring in 2022   FOR each Nominee   12  
         
    2.   Advisory Resolution Approving NEO Compensation   FOR   66  
         
    3   Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Auditor for Fiscal Year 2019   FOR   67  
         

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2022

The Company's Board consists of 10 directors. The Company's By-Laws establish three classes of directors with each class being as nearly equal in number as possible and serving three-year terms.

The Board has nominated three directors for election at the Annual Meeting, as outlined in the table below. Each director nominee has been nominated to serve for a three-year term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2022. The Board recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" each of the nominees named below.

                                 
      Age

Director Since

Independent

Other Public Directorships

Committees

Proposed Term
Expiration


               
    Jeffery M. Boromisa
Retired Executive Vice President of Kellogg International, President of Latin America; Senior Vice President of Kellogg Company

 
64   2006     None   Audit
Compensation

 
2022  
               
    Gina R. Boswell
President, Customer Development, Unilever U.S.A.

 
56   2013     ManpowerGroup Inc.   Compensation
Governance

 
2022  
               
    David T. Kollat
President and Chairman, 22, Inc.

 
80   1992     L. Brands, Inc.   Independent
Lead Director

 
2022  
               

Board Highlights

The following charts illustrate key characteristics of the Company's Board:

GRAPHIC

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

5

Table of Contents

Board is Composed of Directors with the Right Mix of Skills and Experiences

The following chart lists the important experiences and attributes that the Company's Directors possess:

GRAPHIC

Shareholder Engagement

Our Board greatly values the views of our shareholders and has made meaningful changes to our compensation and governance programs over the last several years in response to shareholder feedback. For example, we made significant changes to our executive compensation program in 2017 after discussion with shareholders and other stakeholders. Shareholder response to these changes was overwhelmingly positive, which translated to 98% and 94% support in 2017 and 2018, respectively, for our say on pay proposal. As part of its ongoing shareholder engagement efforts, the Company reached out again in early 2019 to shareholders representing 54% of its outstanding shares and has held or expects to hold telephonic meetings with all shareholders who accepted (representing about 17.4% of outstanding shares). Discussions focused on Company strategy, financial performance, governance and compensation programs.

Corporate Governance Highlights

Wolverine Worldwide is committed to a governance structure that provides strong shareholder rights and meaningful accountability.

 

Highly independent Board and Committees

Lead Independent Director with clearly defined role

Majority voting with director resignation policy

No supermajority vote requirements

Shareholder right to act by written consent

 

Annual Board and Committee self-evaluations

Robust Board and executive succession planning, including annual written director nominee evaluations

Long-standing commitment toward diversity

Director onboarding orientation program

Active shareholder engagement practices

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

6


Table of Contents

Compensation Best Practices

What we do   What we do not do

Vast majority of pay is at risk or variable, i.e., performance based or equity-based or both

Stringent share ownership requirements (6x base salary for CEO)

Broad-based clawback policy

Significant vesting horizon for equity grants

Double trigger equity acceleration (for grants in 2017 and after)

Independent Compensation Committee Consultant

Review executive compensation program to ensure it doesn't promote excessive risk taking

Proactively engage with top shareholders on compensation and governance issues

Conduct annual say-on-pay votes

Balance short-term and long-term incentives

 

No dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance shares/units

No repricing or replacing of underwater stock options

No overlapping metrics

No excessive or unnecessary perquisites

No hedging, pledging, or short sales of Company stock

No excise tax gross-ups in change-in-control agreements for new officers (hired after 2008)

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

7

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance

Wolverine Worldwide is committed to the highest level of corporate governance, and the Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to strengthen management accountability and promote long-term shareholder interests.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The shareholders elect directors to serve on the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors" or "Board"). The Board oversees the management of the business by the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and senior management. In addition to its general oversight function, the Board's additional responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the following:

Board Composition

Board Highlights

The Board prides itself on its ability to recruit and retain directors who have high personal and professional integrity and have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment to effectively serve shareholders' long-term interests. These skills and attributes also link with the Company's most important strategic objectives, such as eCommerce and digital growth, brand building, operational excellence and supply chain management, and international growth. The Board also values diversity, as evidenced by the current makeup of the Board. The Board believes that its directors, including the nominees for election as directors at the Annual Meeting, have these characteristics and valuable skills that provide the Company with the variety and depth of knowledge, judgment and strategic vision necessary to provide effective oversight of the Company.

To help accomplish this, and to assist in succession planning, the Board, at the recommendation of the Governance Committee, has identified specified skills and attributes it desires its members to possess. The below graphic lists these skills and attributes and indicates which of the directors possess each. As shown, these skills and attributes are well represented within the Board.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

8


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

The Governance Committee reviews with the Board on an annual basis the appropriate skills and characteristics desired of Board members in the context of the current makeup of the Board. The Board, with the assistance of the Governance Committee, annually assesses the current composition of the Board across many dimensions. As set forth in the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are posted on its website, this assessment addresses the above referred skills and attributes and the individual performance, experience, age and skills of each director.

Director Nominations

The Board's Governance Committee serves as its nominating committee. The Governance Committee, in anticipation of upcoming director elections and other potential or expected Board vacancies, evaluates qualified individuals and recommends candidates to the Board. The Governance Committee may retain a search firm or other external parties to assist it in identifying candidates, and the Governance Committee has the sole authority to approve the search firm's fees and retention terms, and to terminate the firm if necessary.

The Governance Committee considers candidates suggested by directors, senior management or shareholders. Shareholders may recommend individuals as potential director candidates by communicating with the Governance Committee through one of the Board communication mechanisms described under the heading "Shareholder Communications Policy." Shareholders that wish to nominate a director candidate must comply with the procedures set forth in the Company's By-Laws, which are posted on its website. Ultimately, upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, the Board selects the director nominees for election at each annual meeting. In selecting director nominees, the Board considers each candidate's performance as a director (which is assessed through an anonymous written peer evaluation), personal and professional integrity, ability and judgment, and likelihood to be effective, in conjunction with the other nominees and directors, in serving the long-term interests of the shareholders. The Governance Committee also considers candidates' relative skills, attributes, background and characteristics as well as independence under applicable New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") listing standards and the Company's Director Independence Standards, potential to contribute to the composition and culture of the Board, and ability and willingness to actively participate in the Board and committee meetings and to otherwise devote sufficient time to Board duties.

BOARD SELF-ASSESSMENT

As part of an annual self-assessment, each director evaluates the performance of the Board and any committee on which he or she serves across a number of dimensions. Mr. Kollat, as the Lead Independent Director working with the Governance Committee, reviews the Board self-assessment with directors following the end of each fiscal year, and conducts individual director interviews at the end of each year. Committee Chairpersons review the committee self-assessments with their respective committee members and discuss them with the Board. In addition, the Governance Committee, working with the Lead Independent Director, develops and implements guidelines for evaluating all directors standing for nomination and re-election and oversees the evaluation of such nominees.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

9


Table of Contents

The Corporate Governance Guidelines (including the Director Independence Standards), the Charter for each Board standing committee (Audit, Compensation and Governance), the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, By-Laws, Code of Business Conduct, and its Accounting and Finance Code of Ethics all are available on the Wolverine Worldwide website at: www.wolverineworldwide.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/

The Board and applicable committees annually review these and other key governance documents.

RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board oversees the Company's risk management and mitigation activities with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic, operational, financial, environmental, cybersecurity, and legal compliance risks. This oversight is conducted through presentations by and discussions with the CEO, Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), General Counsel or Associate General Counsel, Chief Information Officer, brand and department leaders and other members of management. The Vice President of Internal Audit and Risk Compliance coordinates management's day-to-day risk management and mitigation efforts, and reports directly to the Audit Committee.

The Vice President of Internal Audit and Risk Compliance reviews with the Audit Committee regularly, and with the full Board periodically, management's risk assessment and mitigation strategies. In addition to the above processes, the Board has delegated risk management and mitigation oversight responsibilities to its standing committees, which meet regularly to review and discuss specific risk topics that align with their core responsibilities.

The Company reviewed its compensation policies and practices to assess whether they are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. As part of this review, the Company compiled information about the Company's incentive plans, including reviewing the Company's compensation philosophy, evaluating key incentive plan design features and reviewing historic payout levels and pay mix. With assistance from Company management and its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee reviewed the executive compensation program, and managers from the Company's human resources and legal departments reviewed the non-executive compensation programs.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE CODE OF ETHICS

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct for the Company's directors, officers and employees. The Board also has adopted an Accounting and Finance Code of Ethics ("Accounting and Finance Code") that focuses on the financial reporting process and applies to the Company's CEO, CFO and Corporate Controller.

The Company discloses amendments to or waivers from its Code of Business Conduct affecting directors or executive officers and amendments to or waivers from its Accounting and Finance Code on its website at: www.wolverineworldwide.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

10


Table of Contents

SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS POLICY

Shareholders and other interested parties may send correspondence to the Board, the non-employee directors as a group, a specific Board committee or an individual director (including the Lead Director) in the manner described below.

The General Counsel or Associate General Counsel will provide a summary and copies of all correspondence (other than solicitations for services, products or publications) as applicable at each regularly scheduled meeting.

Communications may be sent via email through various links on our website at: www.wolverineworldwide.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/
or by regular mail c/o General Counsel, Wolverine World Wide, Inc., 9341 Courtland Drive, N.E., Rockford, MI 49351.

The General Counsel or Associate General Counsel will alert individual directors if an item warrants a prompt response from the individual director prior to the next regularly scheduled meeting. Items warranting a prompt response, but not addressed to a specific director, will be routed to the applicable committee Chairperson.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

11


Table of Contents

Proposal 1  — Election of
Directors for Terms Expiring
in 2022

The Company's Board consists of 10 directors. The Company's By-Laws establish three classes of directors, with each class being as nearly equal in number as possible and serving three-year terms. At each annual meeting, the term of one class expires. The Board has nominated three directors for election at the Annual Meeting: Jeffrey M. Boromisa, Gina R. Boswell and David T. Kollat. Each director has been nominated to serve for a three-year term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2022 or until his/her successor, if any, has been elected and is qualified.

All director nominees are independent directors, as determined by the Board under the applicable NYSE listing standards and the Company's Director Independence Standards. Each director nominee currently serves on the Board. The shareholders most recently elected Ms. Boswell and Messrs. Boromisa and Kollat at the Company's 2016 annual meeting.

The Company is not aware of any nominee who will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director. However, if a nominee is unable to serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, the incumbent directors may or may not select a substitute nominee. If the directors select a substitute nominee, the proxy holder will vote the shares represented by all valid proxies for the substitute nominee (unless other instructions are given).

The biographies of the three nominees and the other directors of the Company are below, along with a discussion of the experience and skills of each director.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

12

Table of Contents

Director Nominees with
Proposed Terms
Expiring in 2022

JEFFREY M. BOROMISA
Age:
  64
Director since:   2006

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
Retired Executive Vice
President of Kellogg
International, President of Latin
America; Senior Vice President
of Kellogg Company

Board Committees:
Audit
Compensation

Other Public Directorships:
None

Career Highlights:
Mr. Boromisa worked at Kellogg Company, a global food manufacturing company, and its affiliates from 1981 to 2009. From 2008 through his retirement in May 2009, Mr. Boromisa was Executive Vice President of Kellogg International, President of Latin America; and Senior Vice President of Kellogg Company. From 2007 until 2008, Mr. Boromisa served as Executive Vice President of Kellogg International, President of Asia Pacific and Senior Vice President of Kellogg Company. From 2004 through 2006, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kellogg Company. In addition, beginning in 2004 and through his retirement, Mr. Boromisa was a member of Kellogg Company's Global Leadership Team. Prior to 2004, Mr. Boromisa occupied various leadership positions with Kellogg. Mr. Boromisa is also a director and Audit Committee Chair at Haworth International, Inc., a privately held, multinational, office furniture design and manufacturing company.

Experience and Skills:
With nearly 30 years of experience at Kellogg Company, including serving as its chief financial officer and leading various operational business units, Mr. Boromisa has obtained international business, brand building and finance expertise.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

13


Table of Contents

GINA R. BOSWELL
Age:
  56
Director since:   2013

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
President, Customer
Development,
Unilever U.S.A.

Board Committees:
Compensation
Governance

Other Public Directorships:
ManpowerGroup Inc.

Career Highlights:
Since May 2017, Ms. Boswell has been President, Customer Development for Unilever U.S.A., one of the largest markets for Unilever PLC / Unilever N.V., a multinational consumer goods company whose products include Dove, Vaseline, Lipton, and Hellman's. From July 2015 to May 2017, Ms. Boswell served as Executive Vice President and General Manager for Unilever UK & Ireland. From 2011 to July 2015, Ms. Boswell served as Executive Vice President, Personal Care for Unilever PLC / Unilever N.V. From 2008 to 2011, Ms. Boswell served as President, Global Brands, for The Alberto Culver Company, a consumer goods company. Ms. Boswell has held numerous other senior leadership positions with other leading global companies, including Avon Products, Inc., Ford Motor Company, and Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. Ms. Boswell is a member of the board of ManpowerGroup Inc., a publicly traded workforce solutions company.

Experience and Skills:
Through senior leadership roles with leading branded companies, Ms. Boswell has obtained expertise in brand building, international business, marketing, digital/eCommerce and finance, and her service as a director of public companies has given her experience with public company governance and related matters.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

14


Table of Contents

DAVID T. KOLLAT
Age:
  80
Director since:   1992

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
President and Chairman,
22, Inc.

Board Committees:
Independent Lead Director

Other Public Directorships:
L Brands, Inc.

Career Highlights:
Dr. Kollat has been Chairman and President of 22, Inc., a company specializing in research and management consulting for retailers and consumer goods manufacturers, since 1987. In addition to his marketing and management experience as Chairman and President of 22, Inc., Dr. Kollat served for 11 years in senior leadership positions at L Brands, Inc., a publicly traded, multinational apparel and retail company, including as Executive Vice President, Marketing, President of Victoria's Secret Direct, and as a member of its executive committee. Dr. Kollat is Lead Independent Director of Wolverine Worldwide, a position he has held since 2007. Dr. Kollat has been a director of L Brands, Inc. since 1976 and was a director of Sleep Number Corporation, a bed manufacturer and retailer, from 1994-2018.

Experience and Skills:
Dr. Kollat's more than 40 years' experience at L Brands, Inc. and 22, Inc. has provided him with marketing, apparel, international business, brand building, retail and finance expertise. He also has significant experience with company governance and related matters through service on more than twenty boards of directors, including extensive service on public company boards, and service as a lead independent director and chair of nominating, audit and compensation committees.

The Board, which previously waived the age 72 retirement provision with respect to Dr. Kollat, has determined that it is in the best interests of stockholders for Dr. Kollat to continue to serve as a director, and, therefore, determined to nominate him for an additional three-year term.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the election of the above nominees for proposed terms expiring in 2022.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

15

Table of Contents

Directors with Terms
Expiring in 2020

WILLIAM K. GERBER
Age:
  65
Director since:   2008

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
Managing Director of
Cabrillo Point Capital LLC

Board Committees:
Audit (Chair)
Compensation

Other Public Directorships:
AK Steel Holding
Corporation

Career Highlights:
Mr. Gerber is Managing Director of Cabrillo Point Capital LLC, a private investment fund. He has held that position since 2008. From 1998 to 2007, Mr. Gerber was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kelly Services,  Inc., a publicly traded global staffing solutions company with operations in more than 35 countries. Mr. Gerber served in various leadership positions with L Brands, Inc., a multinational apparel and retail company, prior to joining Kelly Services, Inc. Mr. Gerber is a director of AK Steel Holding Corporation, an innovative steel solutions provider. During the preceding five years, Mr. Gerber was, but no longer is, a director of Kaydon Corporation, a publicly traded company that designed and manufactured custom engineered products.

Experience and Skills:
From his 15 years in senior leadership positions with L Brands, Inc. and Kelly Services, Inc., Mr. Gerber has obtained extensive experience in apparel, retail, international business and finance, and his service as a director of various public companies has given him experience with public company governance and related matters.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

16

Table of Contents

BLAKE W. KRUEGER
Age:
  65
Director since:   2006

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President of
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.

Board Committees:
None

Other Public Directorships:
None

Career Highlights:
Mr. Krueger is Chairman of Wolverine Worldwide, a position he assumed in January 2010, and Chief Executive Officer and President of Wolverine Worldwide, positions he assumed in April 2007. From October 2005 until April 2007, Mr. Krueger served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Wolverine Worldwide. From 2004 to October 2005, he served as Executive Vice President and Secretary of Wolverine Worldwide and President of its Heritage Brands Group. From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Krueger served as Executive Vice President and Secretary of Wolverine Worldwide and President of the Company's Caterpillar Footwear Group. He also previously served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Wolverine Worldwide with various responsibilities including the human resources, retail, business development, accessory licensing, mergers and acquisitions, and legal areas. Mr. Krueger serves as a director of Bissell Homecare, Inc., a privately held company and leading brand of floor care appliances.

Experience and Skills:
Mr. Krueger's more than 25 years in senior leadership roles with the Company have provided him expertise in footwear and apparel, retail, international business and finance, and his board experience at the Company and Professionals Direct,  Inc., a then publicly traded insurance company, has given him extensive experience with public company governance and related matters.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

17


Table of Contents

NICHOLAS T. LONG
Age:
  60
Director since:   2011

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
Retired Chief Executive Officer of MillerCoors LLC

Board Committees:
Compensation (Chair)
Governance

Other Public Directorships:
Amcor Limited

Career Highlights:
From 2011 until his retirement in 2015, Mr. Long served as Chief Executive Officer of MillerCoors LLC, a joint venture between two publicly traded beverage companies. From 2008 to 2011, Mr. Long served as President and Chief Commercial Officer of MillerCoors. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Long served as Chief Executive Officer of Miller Brewing Company, a beverage company, and he served as Chief Marketing Officer of Miller Brewing Company from 2005 to 2007. Prior to joining Miller Brewing Company, Mr. Long spent 17 years in various senior leadership positions at The Coca Cola Company, a beverage company, including Vice President of Strategic Marketing, Global Brands, Vice President, Strategic Marketing Research and Trends, President of Coca Cola's Great Britain and Ireland Division and President of the Northwest Europe Division. Mr. Long currently serves as a director of Amcor Limited, a packaging solutions company.

Experience and Skills:
Through his more than 20 years in senior positions at category leading, branded companies, Mr. Long has developed significant marketing, international business and brand building expertise.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

18


Table of Contents

MICHAEL A. VOLKEMA
Age:
  63
Director since:   2005

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
Chairman of Herman Miller, Inc.

Board Committees:
Audit
Governance (Chair)

Other Public Directorships:
Herman Miller, Inc.

Career Highlights:
Mr. Volkema has been Chairman of Herman Miller, Inc., a publicly traded multinational furniture manufacturer, since 2000. Mr. Volkema became President and Chief Executive Officer of Herman Miller in 1995 and held those positions until 2003 and 2004, respectively. Mr. Volkema also is a director at Milliken & Company, a privately held, innovation based company serving the textile, chemical, and floor covering markets.

Experience and Skills:
Mr. Volkema has obtained international business and brand building expertise from his more than 20 years in senior leadership positions with Herman Miller, Inc. Mr. Volkema also has public company governance and related experience from his extensive service on public company boards, including 18 years as Chairman of Herman Miller, Inc. and service on compensation and audit committees of boards of publicly traded companies.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

19

Table of Contents

Directors with Terms
Expiring in 2021

ROXANE DIVOL
Age:
  46
Director Since:   October 2014

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
Former Executive Vice President and
General Manager, Website
Security for Symantec
Corporation

Board Committees:
Audit
Governance

Other Public Directorships:
None

Career Highlights:
Since March 2019, Ms. Divol has been Group Chief Operating Officer for Webhelp, a European leader in business process and customer experience outsourcing. From February 2017 until January 2018, Ms. Divol was Executive Vice President and General Manager, Website Security, for Symantec Corporation, a global leader in information security solutions. From 2014 to February 2017, Ms. Divol was Senior Vice President and General Manager, Website Security for Symantec. From 2013 to 2014, Ms. Divol was Senior Vice President of Alliances with Symantec. Ms. Divol joined Symantec from McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm, where she was a partner in its San Francisco office and led the West Coast marketing and sales practice, with a focus on marketing return on investment and marketing transformation.

Experience and Skills:
Ms. Divol's experience with Symantec Corporation and McKinsey & Company provides her with expertise in international business, marketing, digital/eCommerce and information technology. In 2017, Ms. Divol was named one of the 50 most powerful women in technology by the National Diversity Council.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

20


Table of Contents

JOSEPH R. GROMEK
Age:
  72
Director since:   2008

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
Retired President, Chief
Executive Officer
and Director of
The Warnaco Group, Inc.

Board Committees:
Compensation
Governance

Other Public Directorships:
Guess?, Inc.
The Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc.

Career Highlights:
From 2003 until his retirement in 2012, Mr. Gromek served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of The Warnaco Group, Inc., a publicly traded textile and apparel company. Mr. Gromek also served as Chief Executive Officer of Brooks Brothers, Inc., a global clothing retailer, from 1995 until 2002. He served as Chairman of the Board of Tumi, Inc., a global luggage and accessories manufacturer, from 2013 until its acquisition by Samsonite International S.A. in 2016. He currently serves as a director of Guess?, Inc., an apparel wholesaler and retailer, and The Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc., a children's clothing retailer. Mr. Gromek is also a director of Stanley M. Proctor Company, a privately held company that distributes a comprehensive range of process-control automation products and solutions.

Experience and Skills:
Having served for more than 40 years in the retail and apparel industries, including 30 years managing and marketing apparel brands and a collective 15 years as the chief executive officer of two leading, multi-national apparel companies, Mr. Gromek has expertise in apparel, retail and international business. His service as a senior executive and director at various public companies has given him extensive leadership experience in public company governance and related matters.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

21


Table of Contents

BRENDA J. LAUDERBACK
Age:
  69
Director since:   2003

GRAPHIC

Select Business Experience:
Retired President of the
Wholesale and Retail Group
of Nine West Group, Inc.

Board Committees:
Audit
Governance

Other Public Directorships:
Denny's Corporation (Board Chair)
Sleep Number Corporation

Career Highlights:
From 1995 until her retirement in 1998, Ms. Lauderback was President of the Wholesale and Retail Group of Nine West Group, Inc., a footwear wholesaler and distributor. She previously was the President of the Wholesale Division of U.S. Shoe Corporation, a footwear manufacturer and distributor, a position that included responsibility for offices in China, Italy and Spain, and she was a Vice President/General Merchandise Manager of Dayton Hudson Corporation (now Target Corporation), a retail company. From 1998 to 2015, Ms. Lauderback also was a director of Big Lots, Inc., a retail company.

Experience and Skills:
Ms. Lauderback has more than 25 years of experience in the retail industry, with more than 20 years in the footwear, apparel, and accessories industries. These senior leadership positions have provided her with strong footwear, apparel and retail expertise. With her service on publicly traded company boards, including Denny's Corporation, a restaurant company, and Sleep Number Corporation, a bed manufacturer and retailer, and as a director of Wolverine Worldwide, she also has extensive experience with public company governance and related matters. Ms. Lauderback was named to the National Association of Corporate Directors' (NACD) 2017 Directorship 100 list.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

22

Table of Contents

BOARD LEADERSHIP

The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines give the Board the flexibility to determine the best leadership structure for the Company based upon the Company's evolving needs and opportunities. The Governance Committee periodically reviews the Board's leadership structure, including whether to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO, based upon the Board and Company's then-current circumstances, and recommends changes to the Board as appropriate. Currently, the Company's CEO also serves as the Chairman of the Board. In addition, since 1993, the independent directors have annually elected a lead independent director who functions in many ways similar to an independent Chairman. The Board continues to believe that this leadership structure is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders at this time and provides the Board with effective independent oversight of management. Specifically, the lead independent director has the following enumerated responsibilities:

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board annually assesses the independence of all directors. To qualify as "independent," the Board must affirmatively determine that the director is independent under the Company's Director Independence Standards, which are modeled after the listing standards of the NYSE. Under NYSE listing standards, the Board has determined that 9 of the Company's 10 directors are independent. Only Mr. Krueger, the Company's CEO, is not independent. All of the Board's committees are comprised entirely of independent directors. The independent directors generally meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled meeting.

The Director Independence Standards define an "Independent Director" as a director who the Board determines otherwise has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company), and who:

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

23

Table of Contents

BOARD COMMITTEES, MEETINGS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE

The Board has three standing committees: Audit, Compensation, and Governance. Each committee meets periodically throughout the year and reports its recommendations to the Board. The Company expects directors to attend every meeting of the Board and the committees on which they serve and to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. In 2018, all directors then serving on the Board attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and all directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board (5 meetings in 2018) and the committees on which they served. All directors are typically invited to and attend all committee meetings.

Each committee annually evaluates its performance to determine its effectiveness. The Board has determined that all committee members are "independent" as defined by NYSE listing standards. Furthermore, each Audit Committee member satisfies the NYSE "financial literacy" requirement. In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Boromisa and Mr. Gerber are "audit committee financial experts" under Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules. Each committee's charter, with a complete list of the duties and responsibilities is available on the Company's website at www.wolverineworldwide.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/.

  AUDIT COMMITTEE
  Committee Members

 

Gerber (Chair)

Boromisa

Divol

Lauderback

Volkema

   
  Number of Meetings in 2018     6
   
  Highlighted Responsibilities    

Appoints, evaluates and oversees the work of the independent auditors and oversees the internal audit function

Oversees the integrity of the Company's financial statements, financial reporting process and internal controls

Oversees the Company's policies and systems regarding risk assessment and management and the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements

    

    

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

24

Table of Contents

 

  COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
  Committee Members

 

Long (Chair)

Boromisa

Boswell

Gerber

Gromek

   
  Number of Meetings in 2018     6
   
  Highlighted Responsibilities    

Assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to executive compensation and the Company's compensation and benefit policies and programs

Oversees the overall compensation structure, policies and programs, including whether the compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for management and employees

Oversees the Company's management of risks relating to management resources, organization structure and succession planning, hiring, development and retention processes, as well as those relating to the Company's compensation structure, policies and programs

    

    

 

  GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
  Committee Members

 

Volkema (Chair)

Boswell

Divol

Gromek

Lauderback

Long

   
  Number of Meetings in 2018     5
   
  Highlighted Responsibilities    

Assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities on matters and issues related to the Company's corporate governance practices

In conjunction with the Board, establishes qualification standards for membership on the Board and its committees and recommends qualified individuals to become Board members or serve for re-election as directors

Develops and recommends to the Board for its approval an annual self-evaluation process for the Board and its committees, and oversees the evaluation process

    

    

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

25

Table of Contents

Non-Employee Director Compensation
in Fiscal Year 2018

The Company's non-employee director compensation philosophy is to pay compensation that is competitive with the compensation paid by companies of similar size, in similar industries and with whom Wolverine Worldwide competes for director candidates. The Governance Committee, with input from management and from the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, reviewed director compensation and compared it to market data, including a comparison to director compensation for the Company's Peer Group, as defined on page 44, and broader industry market surveys (FW Cook 2016 Director Compensation Report and NACD 2016-2017 Compensation Report). Based on this review, non-employee director compensation for fiscal year 2018 was updated as follows compared to fiscal year 2017 compensation.

These changes were implemented to keep Wolverine director compensation near the median of its peer group. The update in form of equity grant was to align with market grant practices.

The following table provides information regarding the compensation of the Company's non-employee directors for fiscal year 2018. Mr. Krueger receives compensation for his services as the Company's CEO and President, but does not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director or chairman.

 

Fees Paid in
Cash




 
Cash Amounts
Voluntarily
Deferred




 

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash1




 

Restricted
Stock Unit
Awards2





 


Totals




 

Boromisa

 

$97,000

   
+
 

-

   
=
 

$97,000

 
+
 

$130,003

 
=
 

$227,003

   

Boswell

  $94,000     +   -     =   $94,000   +   $130,003   =   $224,003    

Divol

  $97,000     +   -     =   $97,000   +   $130,003   =   $227,003    

Gerber

  $117,000     +   -     =   $117,000   +   $130,003   =   $247,003    

Gromek

  -     +   $101,500     =   $101,500   +   $130,003   =   $231,503    

Kollat

  $130,000     +   -     =   $130,000   +   $165,022   =   $295,022    

Lauderback

  $72,750     +   $24,250     =   $97,000   +   $130,003   =   $227,003    

Long

  $101,500     +   -     =   $101,500   +   $130,003   =   $231,503    

O'Donovan

  $50,000     +   -     =   $50,000   +   $130,003   =   $180,003    

Volkema

  $56,000     +   $56,000     =   $112,000   +   $130,003   =   $242,003    
1
Represents cash payments received or deferred by directors for fiscal year 2018. Directors may defer fees pursuant to the Director Deferred Compensation Plan or Deferred Compensation Plan (each as defined below). The table shows the Fees Earned or Paid in Cash separated into Fees Paid in Cash and Cash Amounts Voluntarily Deferred.
2
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted to non-employee directors in fiscal year 2018, calculated in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification units ("ASC") Topic 718, without regard to estimated forfeitures. The chart below lists the aggregate outstanding option awards (granted prior to 2018) and restricted stock units held by non-employee directors at the end of fiscal year 2018. For valuation assumptions, see the Stock Based Compensation footnote to Wolverine Worldwide's Consolidated Financial Statements for fiscal year 2018 included in its Form 10-K for this year.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

26


Table of Contents

Name


Option Awards Outstanding at
December 29, 2018
(#)



Restricted Stock Units held at
December 29, 2018
(#)



 

Boromisa

 

71,864

 

4,440

   

Boswell

  44,735   4,440    

Divol

  40,002   4,440    

Gerber

  61,994   4,440    

Gromek

  71,864   4,440    

Kollat

  84,166   5,636    

Lauderback

  61,994   4,440    

Long

  60,642   4,440    

O'Donovan

  61,994   -    

Volkema

  55,326   4,440    

The following table shows the non-employee director compensation program for fiscal year 2018:

  Compensation Plan for 2018
 
Component
Cash
Restricted Stock Units1
 

Annual Director Fee


 


$70,000                        


Number of restricted stock units "RSUs" with a grant date value of $130,000.


 
Audit Committee Annual Fee   $15,000                            
Audit Committee Chairperson Annual Fee   $25,000                            
Compensation Committee Annual Fee   $12,000                            
Compensation Committee Chairperson Annual Fee   $20,000                            
Governance Committee Annual Fee   $12,000                            
Governance Committee Chairperson Annual Fee   $15,000                            
Lead Director Annual Fee   In lieu of the standard Annual Director Fee, the Lead Director was paid a Cash Retainer of $135,000. In lieu of the standard RSU grant, the Lead Director received a number of RSUs with a grant date value of $165,000.  
1
For fiscal year 2018, Messrs. Boromisa, Gerber, Gromek, Long and Volkema and Mses. Boswell, Divol and Lauderback each received 4,440 restricted stock units (5,636 for Dr. Kollat) granted in May 2018 under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2016, as amended. RSUs vest one year from the date of grant.

The Company also:

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

27


Table of Contents

2019 Updates.    After a review of Wolverine's director compensation program compared to both its peer group and broader industry market surveys (FW Cook 2017 Director Compensation Report and NACD 2017-2018 Compensation Report), the Company modified director compensation as follows for 2019.

These changes were implemented to keep Wolverine's director compensation near the median of its peer group.

Director Deferred Compensation Plan.    The Company's Amended and Restated Outside Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Director Deferred Compensation Plan") is a supplemental nonqualified deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors. A separate non-employee director deferred compensation plan applies to benefits accrued under that plan before January 1, 2005. The Director Deferred Compensation Plan permits all non-employee directors to voluntarily defer, at their option, 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of their director fees. The Company establishes a book account for each non-employee director and credits the director's account with a number of stock units equal to the amounts voluntarily deferred, divided by the closing market price of common stock on the payment/deferral date. The Company also credits director accounts with dividend equivalents on amounts previously deferred in the form of additional stock units. The amounts credited to director accounts are treated as if invested in Wolverine Worldwide common stock. The number of stock units held in director accounts is set forth under the "Stock Ownership By Management and Others" table below.

Upon a director's termination of service, or such later date as a director selects, the Company will distribute the stock units in the director's book account in shares of Wolverine Worldwide common stock in either a single, lump sum distribution or annual installment distributions over a period of up to 20 years (10 years under the plan for benefits accrued before January 1, 2005). The Company converts each stock unit to one share of Wolverine Worldwide common stock.

Upon a "change in control," the Company will distribute to the director, in a single, lump sum distribution, Wolverine Worldwide common stock in a number of shares equal to the stock units credited to a director's book account. The Deferred Compensation Plan defines "change in control" as any of the following:

Deferred Compensation Plan.    For a description of the non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan under which Directors may also defer cash fees, please see the "Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation" section on page 59.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Each non-employee director must attain (and maintain) a minimum stock ownership level (including owned shares, the in the money value of stock options, and stock units under the Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan) equal to six times the non-employee director annual cash retainer prior to being able to gift or sell any Company stock. During 2018, all non-employee directors were in compliance with these guidelines.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

28

Table of Contents

Securities Ownership of Officers and Directors and Certain Beneficial Owners

FIVE PERCENT SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information about those holders known by Wolverine Worldwide to be the beneficial owners of more than five percent of Wolverine Worldwide's outstanding shares of common stock as of March 11, 2019:

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Sole Voting
Power
Sole
Investment
Power
Shared Voting
Power
Shared
Investment
Power
Total
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent
of Class3

BlackRock, Inc.1
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055

13,548,359 13,830,159 - - 13,830,159 15.4%

The Vanguard Group2
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355

194,464 9,315,339 12,875 198,019 9,513,358 10.6%
1
Based solely on information set forth in a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 31, 2019.
2
Based solely on information set forth in a Schedule 13G/A filed on March 11, 2019.
3
Based on 90,006,408 shares outstanding as of March 11, 2019.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

29

Table of Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP BY MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS

The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned as of March 11, 2019, by each of the Company's directors and named executive officers and all of the Company's directors and executive officers as a group:

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock1

Deferred
Stock Units,
Sole Voting
and/or
Investment
Power2,3






Shared Voting or
Investment
Power4



Stock
Options5


Total
Beneficial
Ownership



Percent
of Class6


 

Jeffrey M. Boromisa

76,113 34,282 61,994 172,389 *  

Gina R. Boswell

16,038 44,735 60,773 *  

Roxane Divol

21,970 40,002 61,972 *  

William K. Gerber

43,913 55,326 99,239 *  

Joseph R. Gromek

118,902 61,994 180,896 *  

David T. Kollat

310,234 75,296 385,530 *  

Michael Jeppesen

51,138 51,988 103,126 *  

Blake W. Krueger

780,688 29,889 1,328,392 2,138,969 2.34%  

Brenda J. Lauderback

67,599 55,326 122,925 *  

Nicholas T. Long

23,349 60,642 83,991 *  

Michael D. Stornant

136,341 145,842 282,183 *  

Michael A. Volkema

68,738 55,326 124,064 *  

Richard J. Woodworth

79,846 105,177 185,023 *  

James D. Zwiers

71,387 176,158 230,588 478,133 *  

All directors and executive officers as a group (17 people)

1,920,872 240,329 2,395,769 4,556,970 4.93%  

Restricted
Units


Performance
Units


 

Krueger

134,806 404,512  

Jeppesen

25,393 49,015  

Stornant

30,281 58,454  

Woodworth

26,819 52,168  

Zwiers

28,477 55,393  

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

30


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion
and Analysis

SUMMARY

The Company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") provides an overview and analysis of the executive compensation program for the Company's named executive officers ("NEOs"). For 2018, the Company's NEOs were:

Blake W. Krueger

 

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

Michael Jeppesen

  President, Global Operations Group and Wolverine Heritage Group

Michael D. Stornant

  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Richard J. Woodworth

  President, Wolverine Boston Group

James D. Zwiers

  Executive Vice President

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES

The Company's compensation philosophy is to provide executives with a competitive compensation package that is heavily weighted towards performance-based (performance shares and annual bonus opportunity) and variable (restricted stock units) compensation in order to encourage superior business and financial performance over the short and longer term and, by linking compensation with stock price performance, to closely align the interests of the Company's NEOs with those of its shareholders without encouraging excessive risk-taking. The Compensation Committee (the "Committee") oversees the Company's executive compensation program.

The executive compensation program has four primary objectives:

Compensation Decisions in Context: Key 2018 Accomplishments and Financial Highlights; 2019 Focus

2018 was a successful year for the Company as it executed on the Global Growth Agenda, with solid underlying revenue growth achieved across the portfolio including several of the largest brands. Key financial highlights for the Company during 2018 included the following:

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

31


Table of Contents

2018 Compensation Program Overview

The Company's executive compensation program consists of base salary, annual bonus opportunity, long-term incentive compensation, and benefits. A breakdown of base salary, annual performance bonus, and long-term incentive compensation is illustrated below:

ELEMENT
   
  COMPONENT
   
  METRICS
   
  WHAT THE PAY ELEMENT REWARDS
   
                                

    

Base
Salary

    


 
   

    

Cash

    

     

    

Fixed amount based on responsibilities, experience and market data

    

     

    

Scope of core responsibilities, years of experience, and potential to affect the Company's overall performance

    

   
             
                                

    

Annual
Performance
Bonus

    



 
   

    

Company/Business Unit Cash Bonus

Individual Cash Bonus

Backlog Modifier

    

     

    

85% revenue and adjusted pretax earnings

15% specific individualized performance targets

Total payout adjusted up/down up to plus or minus 25% based on year-end backlog modifier

    

     

    

Achieving specific corporate business and/or divisional objectives over which the NEO has reasonable control

Achieving specific personal objectives

Achieving key financial metric, consistent with communicated objectives

    


 
 
             
                                

    

Long-Term
Incentive Compensation

    


 
   

    

Performance share units

Time-vesting restricted stock units

    

     

    

Uses the following performance metrics (weighted as indicated)

65% Adjusted earnings per share

35% Adjusted business value-added

Relative TSR adjusted total payout up/down up to plus or minus 25%

Four-year vesting for time- vested restricted stock units

    

     

    

Balances focus on near-term profitability with longer-term shareholder value creation

Achieving long-term corporate objectives

Driving long-term shareholder value

Continued, long-term employment at Wolverine Worldwide

Adjusted to increase (or reduce) payout based on relative TSR performance

    

   
             

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

32


Table of Contents

Pay at Risk

Under the Company's compensation program, a significant portion of the compensation awarded to the NEOs generally, and to the CEO in particular, is at risk (contingent upon the attainment of various pre-established short and long-term financial goals) and variable (contingent on the performance of the Company's stock price). NEO compensation that is significantly at risk and variable incentivizes superior business and financial performance and, by linking compensation with stock price performance, aligns the interests of executives with those of shareholders.

The following graphic illustrates the percentage of 2018 NEO target compensation that is at risk:

2018 Target Total Compensation

CEO

GRAPHIC

Average NEOS

GRAPHIC

Long-Term Incentive Program Mix

The long-term incentive program is heavily weighted to at-risk compensation, with a mix of 70% performance stock units and 30% time vested restricted stock units for the CEO. For other NEOs, the 2018 mix was 60% performance stock units and 40% time vested restricted stock units.

Compensation Best Practices

What we do   What we do not do

Vast majority of pay is at risk or variable, i.e. , performance based or equity-based or both

Stringent share ownership requirements (6x base salary for CEO)

Broad-based clawback policy

Significant vesting horizon for equity grants

Double trigger equity acceleration (for grants in 2017 and beyond)

Independent Compensation Committee Consultant

Review executive compensation program to ensure it doesn't promote excessive risk taking

Proactively engage with top shareholders on compensation and governance issues

Conduct annual say-on-pay votes

Balance short-term and long-term incentives

 

No dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance shares/units

No repricing or replacing of underwater stock options

No overlapping metrics

No excessive or unnecessary perquisites

No hedging, pledging, or short sales of Company stock

No excise tax gross-ups in change-in-control agreements for new officers (hired after 2008)

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

33

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2018 COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Setting Targets

Each February, the Committee recommends (and the independent directors approve) target compensation for the CEO for the upcoming year after considering the latest available information, including the Company's TSR and other business and financial performance, information provided by the Committee's compensation consultant regarding executive compensation trends and compensation paid to other chief executive officers of companies in the compensation peer group (described below), and information provided by management on recent Company performance and the Company's future business and financial outlook. The Committee's goal is to set the CEO's compensation in line with the anticipated market median compensation for that year.

Given the significant weight the Company's executive compensation program places on at risk and variable compensation, the compensation realized by the CEO and NEOs can be significantly affected, both positively and negatively, by performance against the various operational and financial performance metrics pre-established by the Committee and by the performance of the Company's stock. The Board and Committee believe such a compensation program aligns the interests of the CEO and other NEOs with the interests of the shareholders.

The Company's executive compensation program consists of four primary elements: base salary, annual bonus opportunity, long- term incentive compensation and benefits. These elements are described in greater detail below.

Base Salary

As part of approving an NEO's base salary, the Committee considers a variety of factors including individual responsibilities, experience, skills, and potential to affect Wolverine Worldwide's overall performance, as well as market surveys and peer group information. The Committee considers these compensation factors subjectively, and no single factor or combination of factors was determinative in setting base salaries for any NEO for fiscal 2018.

Based on the above factors, the Committee approved the 2018 base salaries for the NEOs as noted in the following table. The Committee held CEO salary flat in 2018 for the fifth year in a row and held it flat again in 2019. The 2-6% base salary increases for Messrs. Jeppesen, Stornant, Woodworth and Zwiers were based on their performance evaluations as well as consideration of peer group and broad-based industry compensation data, as described in detail below.

Name


2018 Base Salary
2017 Base Salary

Krueger

$1,150,000 $1,150,000

Jeppesen

$607,000 $589,000

Stornant

$600,000 $564,000

Woodworth

$580,000 $564,000

Zwiers

$670,000 $658,000

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

34

Table of Contents

Annual Bonus

In 2018, each NEO had the opportunity to earn annual cash incentive compensation ("annual bonus"), consisting of a performance bonus and an individual performance bonus, and further subject to a modifier:


Key Factors
2018 Company Metrics
Performance Bonus  

Based on performance measured against Company and/or business unit performance criteria established at the beginning of 2018

Payout determined by comparing performance against four performance levels set for each pre-set criterion: threshold (25% payout), target (100% payout), goal (150% payout) and stretch (200% payout)

 

Revenue (45%)

Adjusted pretax earnings (55%)

Individual
Performance Bonus
 

Measured against individual performance criteria

Each NEO's payout was determined by comparing individual performance against specific individual criteria set at the beginning of 2018

Payouts can range from 0% to 200% depending on the NEO's performance against individual performance objectives

 

Vary by each NEO

Modifier  

Total payout based on the above two components adjusted up or down by up to 25% based on year-end backlog

 

+/- 25% year-end backlog modifier

A percentage of each NEO's 2018 base salary was set as the annual bonus target percentage (the "Target Bonus Percentage"). The Target Bonus Percentage represents the percentage of each NEO's base salary that could be earned as annual incentive compensation at a "target" performance level (100% payout) for each of the performance bonus and individual performance bonus. Generally, the Committee sets higher Target Bonus Percentages for individuals with greater influence on business strategy, profit or sales. This puts a larger percentage of an NEO's total potential cash compensation at risk, in line with the NEO's ability to influence these factors. For 2018, the NEOs had the following Target Bonus Percentages: Mr. Krueger 125%, Mr. Jeppesen 55%, Mr. Stornant 60%, Mr. Woodworth 55%, Mr. Zwiers 55%.

The Committee selected fiscal year 2018 revenue and adjusted pretax earnings as metrics for the performance bonus because it believes a strong correlation exists between performance on these financial measures and increases in shareholder value. The Committee also added a year-end backlog modifier for 2018 to more directly align with the Company's focus on go-forward revenue growth. The change from the adjusted operating margin modifier used in 2017 to the backlog modifier used in 2018 and the increased revenue weighting in 2018 compared to 2017 reflects the Company's shift in focus from its Wolverine Way Forward operational transformation to its revenue-focused Global Growth Agenda.

Performance Bonus

Messrs. Krueger and Stornant had significant influence on the Company's overall business performance and, accordingly, their respective performance bonus opportunity (85% of their total annual bonus opportunity) is based on the Company performance criteria only. Messrs. Jeppesen, Woodworth and Zwiers were directly responsible for specific business units and exert a significant influence on those business units in particular, in addition to influencing Company performance. Accordingly, for each of these NEOs, a larger percentage of their overall annual bonus opportunity was based on business unit performance, with a smaller percentage based on the Company's performance, as reflected in the table on page 39.

As shown in the table below, the Committee also set four performance levels for each criterion: threshold (25% payout), target (100% payout), goal (150% payout) and stretch (200% payout). The Committee set the revenue and pretax earnings goals for these performance levels following a review of the Company's operating plan, historical performance, and industry and macroeconomic conditions. The revenue performance targets, though slightly lower than 2017 targets, were set aggressively in light of the difficult industry and macroeconomic conditions. Revenue performance at target (100%) was set above the mid-point of the Company's initial 2018 guidance, and goal performance (150%) was set above the top end of the guidance. Despite the planned decrease in revenue, the Committee set adjusted pretax earnings targets 13% higher than 2017, reflecting the expectation of improved adjusted profitability driven by the 2017 Wolverine Way Forward transformation.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

35

Table of Contents

Company
Performance Level


in millions
(% of Target Payout)1
Revenue2
Adjusted Pretax Earnings2,3
Threshold (25%) $2,145 $211.8
Target (100%) $2,290 $239.7
Goal (150%) $2,358 $256.5
Stretch (200%) $2,448 $273.3
1
The maximum payout (before the effect of the modifier) an NEO can receive is 200% of his Target Bonus Percentage, even if performance is above stretch, and an NEO would receive 0% of his Target Bonus Percentage if performance is below threshold. With the addition of the modifier, an NEO could earn up to an additional 25% of his overall payout before the modifier.
2
2018 corporate revenue performance fell between threshold and target, resulting in a 65% payout on this measure. 2018 corporate pretax earnings performance was between target and goal, resulting in a 116% payout on this measure.
3
Adjusted pretax earnings are earnings before income taxes, excluding the effect of acquisitions, divestitures, accounting changes, restructuring, or other special charges or extraordinary items excluded by the Compensation Committee. Pretax earnings for 2018 exclude the impact of environmental and related costs, pension settlement costs and other costs.

For each business unit, the Committee sets the revenue and adjusted pretax earnings goals at substantially similar levels of difficulty as the goals for the Company and with a similar degree of difficulty as in prior years. The below table shows historical weighted performance levels achieved by the business units using these performance criteria for the years for which a meaningful comparison can be made.

    Historical Group Performance1
    2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Wolverine Boston Group   Between threshold and target   Between threshold and target   Between threshold and target   Below threshold   Below threshold
Wolverine Heritage Group   Between threshold and target   Between threshold and target   Between threshold and target   Below threshold   Between target and goal
International Group   Between target and goal   Between target and goal   Between target and goal   Between target and goal   Between goal and stretch
eCommerce   Between threshold and target   Between target and goal   Between threshold and target   N/A   N/A
Stores   Between threshold and target   Between threshold and target   N/A   N/A   N/A
1
The brand groups were changed in 2016. The performance information above is for the historical group closest in makeup to the 2018 groups.

In February 2019, the Committee certified actual 2018 performance compared to the performance levels for the Company and business unit criteria. The Company's fiscal year 2018 revenue was approximately $2.239 billion, which was between threshold and target level. The Company's adjusted pretax earnings for fiscal year 2018 were $245.1 million, which was between target and goal level. The weighted average results for the applicable performance criterion are shown in the below table:

    2018 Performance
Overall Weighted Payout by Group
Wolverine Boston Group   Between threshold and target   80%
Wolverine Heritage Group   Between threshold and target   69%
Wolverine Worldwide   Between threshold and target   93%
International Group   Between target and goal   101%
eCommerce   Between threshold and target   50%
Stores   Between threshold and target   51%

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

36

Table of Contents

For 2018, the Company paid the NEOs the following amounts relating to the performance bonus.

Name
Performance Bonus
(as a % of Total Annual Bonus
Opportunity)1



Performance Bonus Opportunity
(as a % of an NEO's Target
Percentage)1



Performance Bonus
Percentage Earned1,2,3


Performance Bonus Paid1,2,3  
Krueger   85%   0 - 200%   94%   $1,143,485  
Jeppesen   85%   0 - 200%   78%   $220,432  
Stornant   85%   0 - 200%   94%   $283,064  
Woodworth   85%   0 - 200%   85%   $228,897  
Zwiers   85%   0 - 200%   77%   $241,795  
1
Not including any positive or negative adjustment based on the modifier described below.
2
Percentages earned and bonuses paid vary due to the relative performance of various business units versus overall corporate performance.
3
Not including Individual Performance Bonus.

Individual Performance Bonus

At the same time Target Bonus Percentages are set, the CEO approves measurable personal objectives for each NEO's individual bonus, other than for himself. The CEO submits, and the Committee reviews and approves, with such changes as it considers appropriate, the CEO's personal objectives. Such measurable personal objectives may include goals such as executing strategies supporting the Company's vision, developing employees, growing new business initiatives and driving operational excellence. Performance is evaluated by the CEO (or, in the case of the CEO, by the Committee and the other independent directors) based on qualitative and quantitative factors. Summaries of the specific personal objectives for each NEO are outlined in the table below:

NEO
2018 Personal Objectives
Krueger   transformation scorecard, organic growth, cash flow
Jeppesen   transformation scorecard, backlog, successful implementation of PLM and PDM, senior leadership development
Stornant   transformation scorecard, organic growth, protect company investments and market share
Woodworth   transformation scorecard, backlog, senior leadership development
Zwiers   transformation scorecard, revenue growth, individual development plan achievement

Each personal objective is given a rating from "does not achieve" to "exceptional," with weighted performance ratings and payouts consistent with the following table:

Personal Objectives Rating
2018 Payout Level
Exceptional 200%
Far Exceeds 175%
Exceeds 150%
Achieves 100%
Achieves Some But Not All 50%
Does Not Achieve 0%

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

37

Table of Contents

The CEO recommended, and the Committee approved, the 2018 cumulative weighted personal objectives scores and payout levels for each of the NEOs other than himself. The Committee and the other independent directors of the Board met with the CEO at the end of the year to evaluate his performance against his personal objectives. The Committee determined the cumulative weighted personal objectives score for the CEO and recommended to the independent directors of the Board the CEO's payout level.

Name


Individual
Performance Bonus
(as a % of Total Annual Bonus
Opportunity)




2018 Individual Bonus
Opportunity
(as a % of an NEO's Target
Percentage)




2018
Individual Bonus
Percentage Achieved



2018
Individual
Bonus Paid

Krueger

15% 0 - 200% 108% $232,659

Jeppesen

15% 0 - 200% 100% $49,792

Stornant

15% 0 - 200% 100% $53,377

Woodworth

15% 0 - 200% 113% $53,546

Zwiers

15% 0 - 200% 94% $51,642

Backlog Modifier

The Committee added a backlog modifier for 2018 to align with the Company's shift in focus to go-forward revenue growth upon completion of its Wolverine Way Forward operational transformation. The Committee set the following backlog modifier for 2018.

Company Backlog1,2


 

Achieved Backlog Growth

+2x

Maintained Backlog Growth

No Adjustment

Did Not Achieve Backlog Growth

–2x

Brand/Group Backlog1,2


 

Exceeded Backlog Growth Threshold

+3x

Achieved Backlog Target Growth Threshold

No Adjustment

Did Not Achieve Backlog Growth Threshold

–2x
1
Times the % increase or decrease in backlog
2
Modifier adjustments will not fall below –25% or exceed 25%

At the Company level, a 2x modification was applied to each percentage increase (positive modification) or decrease (negative modification), capped at +/– 25%, based on average backlog at the end of the last three weeks of the 2018 fiscal year compared to the same periods during the 2017 fiscal year. At the brand/group level, a 3x positive modification was applied to each percent increase above a target backlog growth threshold and a 2x negative modification was applied to each percent below the target growth threshold, measured at the same time and with the same 25% cap as the Company calculation. The resulting modifications are reflected in the table below in the "Backlog Multiplier" column.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

38


Table of Contents

Each NEO's total annual bonus opportunity for 2018 ranged from 0% to 200% of the Target Bonus Percentage before applying the backlog modifier. The accompanying table shows the aggregate annual incentive compensation payout earned by each NEO for 2018, as well as the portion of that aggregate number that is attributable to the performance bonus and individual performance bonus and the effect of the backlog modifier.

GRAPHIC

1
Based on revenue and pretax earnings performance criteria for the Company, as described above under "Annual Bonus — Performance Bonus."
2
Based on revenue and pretax earnings as the performance criteria for the Wolverine Heritage Group.
3
Based on revenue and pretax earnings as the performance criteria for the Wolverine Boston Group.
4
Based on revenue and pretax earnings as the performance criteria for: Stores (10%), eCommerce (25%), and International (20%).

Overall NEO annual bonus paid out at near target levels, including for the CEO, in a year when the Company's TSR performance was at the 61st percentile of its peer group. Further, the following graph shows the CEO's target bonus opportunity compared to his actual annual bonus earned over the last three years, which demonstrates the Company's pay for performance philosophy in action. There is clear directional alignment between the Company's TSR performance and the CEO's annual bonus achievement over this period, during which the

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

39


Table of Contents

Company's TSR performance was at the 96th percentile of its peer group. The CEO's target annual bonus opportunity was not increased over this timeframe.

GRAPHIC

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

In 2018, each NEO had the opportunity to earn long-term incentive compensation comprised of a mix of performance share units and time-based restricted stock unit awards.


Key Factors
Performance Share Metrics1
Performance Share Units  

Performance share units are based on performance criteria covering three-year periods

Awards balance focus on near term profitability with longer term shareholder value creation

 

Fully diluted adjusted EPS (65%)

Adjusted Business Value Added ("BVA")2 (35%)

Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards  

Encourages employee retention and rewards increases in stock price

   
1
EPS is calculated on a fully diluted basis and EPS and BVA are each adjusted to account for and exclude the effects of acquisitions, divestitures, accounting changes, restructuring, or other similar special charges or extraordinary items excluded by the Committee, including foreign exchange.
2
BVA is calculated by starting with operating income determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), and then reducing operating income by (1) an amount for income taxes where the effective tax rate used to calculate the income tax amount is determined in accordance with GAAP (adjusted consistent with EPS adjustments, as described above), and (2) a capital charge equal to a 14 point average of "net operating assets" during the fiscal year (with "net operating assets" defined as the net of trade receivables (net of reserves), inventory (net of reserves), other current assets, property, plant and equipment, trade payables and accrued liabilities) multiplied by 10%.

The Committee believes EPS is a key metric that plays an important role in driving shareholder value and that it further aligns the interests of the NEOs with other shareholders. The Committee believes that BVA is useful for determining incentive compensation because it ties the income statement (profit delivery) to the balance sheet (effective asset utilization) and does not focus on one to the exclusion of the other. The Committee further believes that focusing NEOs' interests on increasing BVA aligns their interests more closely with shareholder interests. The use of both EPS and BVA balances the NEOs' focus on near term profitability with longer term shareholder value. Shareholders gave positive feedback on these measures during the Committee's shareholder outreach. The Committee weighted EPS 65%

2019 PROXY STATEMENT

 

GRAPHIC

 

40

Table of Contents

and BVA 35% when determining the overall performance level. For the 2018-2020 performance period, the Committee added a relative TSR modifier that provides a 25% positive adjustment to total payout for TSR performance in the top quartile of the Company's peer group and a 25% negative adjustment to total payout for performance in the bottom quartile of the peer group.

The Committee has chosen to provide long-term incentives in these forms because they incentivize and motivate different behaviors. Performance share units reward the achievement of key business criteria. Time-based restricted stock units encourage employee retention by providing some level of value to executives who remain employed during the vesting period. The use of restricted stock units also supports an ownership culture and thereby encourages executives to take actions that are best for the Company's long-term success. Both forms of long-term incentive compensation reward increased Company stock price.

2016-2018 Performance Shares

The following table lists the performance levels set by the Committee for performance share awards granted for the 2016-2018 performance period, the vesting of which occurred on February 6, 2019 following the Committee's certification of 2016-2018 financial results.

Performance Level
(Percentage of Target Payout)



Cumulative EPS for the 2016-2018 period1
Cumulative BVA for the 2016-2018 period1
(in millions)

Threshold (50%)